Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Ex-Pentagon aide urges Trump to fire Hegseth, citing ‘full-blown meltdown’ and ‘total chaos’

Published

on


A recently departed top Pentagon aide goaded President Donald Trump to remove Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth from his Cabinet, describing «total chaos» and «dysfunction» within the top brass of the military. 

«The dysfunction is now a major distraction for the president – who deserves better from his senior leadership,» John Ullyot, a former senior communications official for the Pentagon, wrote in an op-ed for Politico published on Sunday. 

Advertisement

«Trump has a strong record of holding his top officials to account. Given that, it’s hard to see Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth remaining in his role for much longer.»

Ullyot departed the Pentagon’s public affairs office last week because he did not want to be second-in-command to chief spokesperson Sean Parnell. 

AXED PENTAGON AIDES CLAIM THEIR CHARACTER WAS ‘SLANDERED,’ LITTLE DETAILS WERE SHARED ABOUT LEAK INVESTIGATION

Advertisement

Top Pentagon aide John Ullyot goaded President Donald Trump to remove Sec. Pete Hegseth from his Cabinet, describing «total chaos» and «dysfunction» within the top brass of the military (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

On Friday, the Pentagon fired three Hegseth aides – Dan Caldwell, Colin Carroll and Darin Selnick – three of the secretary’s «most loyal» advisers, according to Ullyot. He called the purge «strange» and «baffling.»

Following them out the door is chief of staff Joe Kasper, who the three men frequently found themselves at odds with, three defense officials confirmed to Fox News Digital. 

Advertisement

«In short, the building is in disarray under Hegseth’s leadership.»

He called himself a «strong backer» of Hegseth, but admitted: «The last month has been a full-blown meltdown at the Pentagon – and it’s becoming a real problem for the administration.»

The shake-ups came just as reports broke about a second Signal chat where Hegseth discussed plans to strike Houthis in Yemen, this one allegedly including his wife, brother and personal lawyer.

Advertisement

That chat reportedly discussed flight schedules for the F/A-18 Hornets targeting the Houthis in Yemen – similar information to that shared in the chat of Trump Cabinet members where national security advisor Mike Waltz unintentionally added The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg. 

«Another day, another old story,» Parnell said in a statement after the latest Signal chat reporting. «There was no classified information in any Signal chat, no matter how many ways they try to write the story.»

PENTAGON’S WEEK OF POWER STRUGGLES: LEAK FALLOUT AND SHOUTING MATCHES HIT HEGSETH’S INNER CIRCLE

Advertisement
3 Hegseth aides placed on administrative leave

Dan Caldwell, Darin Selnick and Colin Carroll, pictured left to right. (Concerned Vets/USMC/DOD)

«Unfortunately, after a terrible month, the Pentagon focus is no longer on warfighting, but on endless drama,» Ullyot wrote. 

«The president deserves better than the current mishegoss at the Pentagon. Given his record of holding prior Cabinet leaders accountable, many in the secretary’s own inner circle will applaud quietly if Trump chooses to do the same in short order at the top of the Defense Department.»

Trump allies eviscerated Ullyot on social media after the op-ed was published. 

Advertisement

«This guy is not America First,» Donald Trump Jr. wrote on X. «I’ve been hearing for years that he works his ass off to subvert my father’s agenda. That ends today. He’s officially exiled from our movement.»

«If you’re echoing Democrat talking points, you no longer support President Trump or his administration. There’s no gray area here,» added Trump advisor Jason Miller. 

The White House, meanwhile, «stands strongly» behind Hegseth, press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News on Monday. 

Advertisement

«The President stands strongly behind Secretary Hegseth, who is doing a phenomenal job leading the Pentagon,» she said. This is what happens when the entire Pentagon is working against you and working against the monumental change that you are trying to implement.»

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

Hegseth brushed off the reporting on the Signal chat Monday, blaming it on «disgruntled employees» and «anonymous smears.» (AP/Mark Schiefelbein)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Hegseth also brushed off the reporting on the Signal chat Monday, blaming it on «disgruntled employees» and «anonymous smears.»

Advertisement

«This is why we’re fighting the fake news media,» he said when pressed on the chat by reporters at the White House Easter Egg roll. «This group right here is full of hoaxsters.»

Pentagon,Defense Spending & Budget News,U.S. Defense & Military Politics,White House,Politics,Media

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Lo que muestran las imágenes satelitales sobre los esfuerzos para destruir los misiles balísticos de Irán

Published

on


Desde que Estados Unidos e Israel comenzaron a atacar conjuntamente a Irán el sábado, destruir las capacidades de misiles balísticos de Irán se ha convertido en un objetivo principal para el presidente Donald Trump, a pesar de la improbabilidad de que pueda lograrse sin tropas terrestres.

Sin una fuerza aérea moderna, Irán ha recurrido durante mucho tiempo a los misiles balísticos para proyectar su poder fuera de sus fronteras.

Advertisement

Su misil balístico más potente es el Shahab-3, capaz de alcanzar objetivos a más de 1900 kilómetros de distancia.

Se cree que la mayoría de estos misiles, así como las instalaciones que los producen, son subterráneos.

Un análisis de imágenes satelitales realizado por The New York Times muestra cómo estos sitios han sido atacados desde que comenzó el sábado la más reciente campaña aérea del Pentágono contra Irán.

Advertisement

A continuación, un vistazo a algunos de los sitios clave que han sido atacados y lo que esto dice sobre la estrategia de Estados Unidos e Israel:

Las instalaciones subterráneas son un objetivo prioritario y difícil de destruir.

El Comando Central de EE. UU. anunció el domingo en redes sociales que había utilizado bombarderos furtivos B-2 para atacar instalaciones de misiles balísticos reforzados con bombas penetradoras de 900 kilos.

Advertisement

El general Dan Caine, jefe del Estado Mayor Conjunto, reconoció el lunes que se necesitaba dicho armamento especializado, ya que las instalaciones eran subterráneas.

Esas bombas probablemente se basaban en la BLU-109, una ojiva de carcasa gruesa diseñada para atravesar roca u hormigón armado antes de detonar.

Están equipadas con un sistema de guiado GPS o láser, según la precisión requerida para la misión.

Advertisement

A diferencia de un ataque aéreo sobre un objetivo sobre el suelo, donde el poder explosivo de una bomba puede transmitirse a través del aire circundante y crear daños a distancia, colocar una munición en el objetivo con la mayor precisión posible es aún más importante cuando se atacan sitios subterráneos, ya que la roca circundante absorberá más poder de la bomba.

Estas bombas penetradoras de una tonelada, citadas por Caine, se utilizarían en instalaciones subterráneas más cercanas a la superficie que los dos emplazamientos nucleares de Fordo y Natanz, profundamente enterrados, que Estados Unidos atacó en junio pasado.

Las instalaciones fueron atacadas con bombas penetradoras especiales de 13.600 kilos, que solo pueden ser lanzadas por bombarderos furtivos B-2.

Advertisement

El uso del BLU-109 o de una ojiva penetradora similar de 2.000 libras para atacar sitios más cercanos a la superficie amplía enormemente los tipos de aeronaves que pueden transportar y emplear esas municiones.

El ejército estadounidense ha señalado que la superficie de Irán es ligeramente mayor que la de Alaska, lo que hace que la ya difícil tarea de localizar las entradas a las instalaciones subterráneas sea aún más complicada.

La destrucción en algunas instalaciones de misiles balísticos sobre la superficie es extensa.

Advertisement

El análisis del Times encontró evidencia de daños en algunas de las instalaciones de misiles balísticos sobre la superficie de Irán, y en unas pocas instalaciones el daño fue extenso.

Por ejemplo, en una instalación de misiles cerca de Kermanshah, varios edificios fueron destruidos.

Y en una instalación de misiles en Garmdareh, en las afueras de Teherán, las imágenes satelitales muestran que al menos nueve edificios fueron alcanzados en dos ataques separados desde el sábado.

Advertisement

Hasta el momento, el Times no ha podido verificar las imágenes satelitales que muestran el ataque a las plantas de producción de misiles. Sam Lair, investigador asociado del Centro James Martin para Estudios de No Proliferación en Monterey, California, sugirió que esto podría ser una maniobra estratégica de Estados Unidos e Israel.

«Podría ocurrir en una etapa posterior del conflicto, una vez que se hayan suprimido las bases de misiles», declaró Lair.

Los emplazamientos de misiles atacados el año pasado vuelven a ser objetivos.

Advertisement

El pasado junio, el complejo nuclear de Isfahán fue intensamente bombardeado con misiles de crucero, pero se salvó de los cuatro días de bombardeos estadounidenses e israelíes.

Sin embargo, las instalaciones de misiles cercanas a la ciudad han sido blanco de ataques, incluyendo algunas que han sido reconstruidas tras los ataques estadounidenses e israelíes de junio.

En el caso de la instalación de misiles balísticos de Isfahán, que fue reconstruida tras el ataque estadounidense de junio pasado, imágenes satelitales recientes muestran que ha sufrido graves daños desde el 28 de febrero.

Advertisement

Hasta el martes, el Comando Central de Estados Unidos, que supervisa todas las operaciones militares estadounidenses en la región, reconoció haber atacado más de 1.700 objetivos dentro de Irán.

c.2026 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

$4.2M US torpedo detonates under Iranian warship in historic ‘No Mercy’ strike

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A multi-million-dollar U.S. Navy torpedo detonated underneath an Iranian warship in a nighttime submarine strike off Sri Lanka’s southern coast — an attack, War Secretary Pete Hegseth said Wednesday in a Pentagon update, was the first of its kind since World War II.

Advertisement

The weapon, identified as a Mark 48 Advanced Capability (ADCAP) torpedo, underscored the scale of force used, and signaled to Tehran that «the gloves really are off,» according to a former U.S. submarine commander.

«The Mark 48 is one of the most lethal anti-ship weapons in the U.S. inventory,» Thomas Shugart, an adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, told Fox News Digital.

The torpedo carries a 650-pound warhead and is designed not to strike a ship directly, Shugart said, but to detonate beneath it, creating a massive vapor bubble that breaks the vessel’s back and splits it in half.

Advertisement

A U.S. submarine sunk an Iranian warship in international waters in the Indian Ocean, War Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed Wednesday. (@DeptofWar / X)

«This torpedo detonated underneath the stern of the Iranian ship and lifted it up out of the water, and so it sank in a matter of minutes,» he added.

The torpedo costs approximately $4.2 million per unit, according to recent data, with Shugart likening the strike to rare submarine attacks in modern naval history.

Advertisement

In addition to World War II, he pointed to the 1982 Falklands War as one example of a submarine-launched torpedo sinking a major surface combatant.

«This was the second time ever that a nuclear-powered submarine has fired a torpedo and sunk a ship,» Shugart said.

«The only other time that happened was a British submarine called HMS Conqueror, which similarly sank an Argentine cruiser, the General Belgrano, during the Falklands War in 1982,» he added.

Advertisement

TRUMP SAYS US MISSION IN IRAN IS ‘AHEAD OF SCHEDULE,’ VOWS TO ‘EASILY PREVAIL’ OVER REGIME

Pete Hegseth

Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to be Defense secretary, at the completion of his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2025. (AP Photo/Ben Curtis) (AP Photo/Ben Curtis)

The naval submarine operation, he said, would have involved increased surveillance, forward naval deployments and targeted actions designed to demonstrate U.S. maritime dominance.

«It definitely seems to me like a message that the gloves really are off,» Shugart added.

Advertisement

«An American submarine sank an Iranian warship that thought it was safe in international waters,» Hegseth told reporters at the Wednesday briefing.

FORMER TOPGUN PILOT DECLARES IRAN MILITARY ‘OVER WITH’ AMID US AIR SUPERIORITY, BUT WARNS OF ANOTHER DANGER

US Submarine

In this photo provided by U.S. Navy, the Los Angeles-class fast attack submarine USS Oklahoma City (SSN 723) returns to U.S. Naval Base in Guam, Aug. 19, 2021. (Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Naomi Johnson/U.S. Navy via AP)

Hesgeth described the strike as «a quiet death,» adding that it marked the first sinking of an enemy ship by torpedo since World War II.

Advertisement

«The U.S. Navy submarines are very highly mobile, very, very quiet, and our crews are extremely well-trained,» Shugart explained. «This was not a challenge for a U.S. Navy submarine to fire a torpedo.»

«To hunt down and sink an Iranian ship like that is not — that’s not a challenging task for a U.S. nuclear-powered submarine,» he said.

The targeted vessel, identified as the IRIS Dena, was the newest frigate in Iran’s naval fleet and was equipped with surface-to-air missiles, anti-ship missiles, torpedo launchers and other heavy weaponry.

Advertisement

According to Sri Lanka’s Foreign Affairs Minister Vijitha Herath, the country’s coast guard received a distress call at 5:08 a.m. local time Wednesday from the Iranian vessel reporting an explosion.

EX-CENTCOM CHIEF DETAILS ‘EXQUISITE INTELLIGENCE’ BEHIND IRAN STRIKES, SAYS NEXT STEPS HINGE ON ‘MISSILE MATH’

Healthcare workers unloading bodies

Healthcare workers unload the bodies of Iranian sailors from a vehicle who died when their IRIS Dena warship sank outside Sri Lanka’s territorial waters, in Galle, Sri Lanka, Wednesday, March 4, 2026. (AP Photo/Eranga Jayawardena)

«I’m not sure Iran has any operational submarines anymore, but if they were operational, their biggest submarines would be at least 20 or 30 years old,» Shugart said.

Advertisement

«They would be ex-Russian diesel-electric submarines, so they’re not nuclear-powered like the U.S. ones, with satellite communications and unlimited mobility.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«The U.S. submarines can operate at high speed for as long as they want with unlimited endurance, other than the food on board. They carry the most advanced weapons, the most advanced sensors.»

Advertisement

«This strike sent a message that if there are any Iranian warships left or any Iranian government-owned ships, they should expect no mercy,» he added.

Related Article

US unleashes Operation Epic Fury, strikes 1,700 Iran targets in 72 hours



war with iran,iran,middle east,us navy,wars

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

DHS defends McLaughlin against allegations husband’s company profited millions from ad contracts: ‘Baseless’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

EXCLUSIVE: Newly obtained financial statements shed light on claims that former Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin’s husband’s company made millions from a DHS advertising campaign.

Advertisement

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem faced intense questioning during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Tuesday, and Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., specifically called out the agency for contracting a public relations firm headed by McLaughlin’s husband, Benjamin Yoho.

«I have personally reviewed the allegations against Ms. McLaughlin, and I find them to be baseless,» DHS General Counsel James Percival told Fox News Digital. «Nothing illegal or unethical occurred with respect to these contracts. Ms. McLaughlin was not involved in selecting any subcontractors.

«She is, however, a superstar in the public affairs world, so I am not surprised that she married a successful businessman whose services were attractive to these outside firms.»

Advertisement

Newly obtained financial statements address allegations that former Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin’s husband’s firm improperly profited from a multimillion-dollar DHS ad campaign. Lawmakers pressed Secretary Kristi Noem over the contracts during a heated Senate hearing. (Jack Gruber/USA Today)

Kennedy alleged that Yoho’s firm, The Strategy Group, «got most of the money» out of what the Louisiana Republican senator says was $220 million in «television advertisements that feature [Noem] prominently.»

«I’m sorry,» Kennedy said. «Safe America Media was a company formed 11 days before you picked them. And that the Strategy Group got most of the money. And the head of that is married to your former spokesperson.»

Advertisement

«It’s just hard for me to believe knowing the president as I do, that you said, ‘Mr. President, here’s some ads I’ve cut, and I’m going to spend $220 million running them,’ that he would have agreed to that,» Kennedy explained. «I don’t think Russ Vought at OMB [Office of Management and Budget] would have agreed to that.»

‘YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED!’: PROTESTER DRAGGED FROM KRISTI NOEM’S SENATE HEARING

Louisiana Sen. John Kennedy speaks to reporters

Senate scrutiny intensified over a DHS advertising campaign after Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., questioned whether a firm linked to McLaughlin’s husband benefited unfairly. DHS officials and the company deny any wrongdoing or multimillion-dollar profits. (Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

The Strategy Group is a conservative advertising agency for which Yoho serves as CEO.

Advertisement

Figures obtained by Fox News Digital show a slightly lesser total advertising expenditure of approximately $185 million, with a total of roughly $146.5 million going to a campaign called «Save America.»

However, of the total that went to «Save America,» roughly $348,000 went to production costs, while the remaining $142 million went to «media buys.»

Sources at DHS say that media buys are the cost of actually buying the ads themselves, whether purchased from social media or for a TV ad.

Advertisement

Kennedy also alleged that the bidding process for the contracts never took place and that Safe America Media’s recent founding was a cause for concern and collusion between McLaughlin and her husband’s business. 

WATCH THE MOST VIRAL MOMENTS AS KRISTI NOEM’S HEARING GOES OFF THE RAILS

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem speaking before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Debate over DHS’ «Save America» ad campaign intensified as senators challenged its costs and contractor ties, even as agency officials touted the initiative as a historic success in promoting self-deportation. (Graeme Sloan/Getty Images)

«Yes they did,» Noem responded during the hearing. «They went out to a competitive bid, and career officials at the department chose who would do those advertising commercials.»

Advertisement

The Strategy Group posted to X Tuesday that it never had a contract with the department. While it did receive several hundred thousand dollars for production costs associated with the advertising campaigns, The Strategy Group never made millions.

«The Strategy Group has never had a contract with DHS,» the post said. «We had a subcontract with Safe America [Media] for limited production services. Safe America paid us $226,137.17 total for 5 film shoots, 45 produced video advertisements and 6 produced radio advertisements.

DHS SPOKESWOMAN TRICIA MCLAUGHLIN TO LEAVE TRUMP ADMIN, SOURCE CONFIRMS

Advertisement
DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin gestures during press conference

Critics raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest in a high-dollar DHS advertising effort, but department representatives say McLaughlin recused herself and that subcontracting decisions were made independently. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)

«If you’re going to try to question our integrity, bring actual evidence — we did,» the post concluded.

Because these ads were purchased using public funds, all contract totals are publicly available. 

Lauren Bis, who took up the role of assistant secretary once McLaughlin left office, told Fox News Digital Tuesday that scrutiny from Republicans and Democrats over the advertising spending was unjustified because the campaigns resulted in «the most successful ad campaign in U.S. history.»

Advertisement

«Sanctuary politicians are attacking this ad campaign because it has been successful in CLOSING our borders and getting more than 2.2 million illegal aliens to LEAVE the U.S.,» Bis said. 

«The DHS domestic and international ad campaign was the most successful ad campaign in U.S. history. The results speak for themselves: 2.2 million illegal aliens self-deported, and we now have the most secure border in American history.»

KRISTI NOEM TO FACE SENATE GRILLING OVER MINNEAPOLIS SHOOTINGS AS DHS SHUTDOWN HITS WEEK 3

Advertisement
Arrest during ICE raid in Texas

The Trump administration reaffirmed that all illegal immigrants are eligible for deportations as they focus on arresting violent criminals first.  (Raquel Natalicchio/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images)

Bis also compared the cost of arresting and deporting an illegal migrant to that of the minimal cost of an illegal migrant self-deporting. The department says the advertising campaign played a key role in marketing self-deportation.

A spokesperson at DHS also told Fox News Digital that contractors decide who they hire, fulfilling the terms of a contract, not the department itself. 

«By law, DHS cannot and does not determine, control or weigh in on who contractors hire or use to fulfill the terms of the contract,» a DHS spokesperson told Fox. «Those decisions are made by the contractor alone. We have only become aware of these companies because of this inquiry and did not hire those companies.»

Advertisement

The spokesperson also noted that McLaughlin «recused herself» from interactions with subcontractors to avoid «any perceived appearance of impropriety.»

«Upon hearing who the subcontractors were for production of the ad, Ms. McLaughlin recused herself from any interaction or engagement with any subcontractors to avoid any perceived appearance of impropriety,» the spokesperson continued. «DHS Office of Public Affairs is the program officer. Ms. McLaughlin oversees the DHS Office of Public Affairs, which is simply the vehicle for this contract.»

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem takes her seat as she arrives to testify during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Tuesday on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images)

McLaughlin told Fox News Digital the criticism of her and her family by senators at the hearing is a matter of public manipulation.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«This is yet another example of politicians intentionally trying to dupe and manipulate the public to try to manufacture division and anger,» McLaughlin told Fox News Digital. «The ad spend and contracts are a matter of public record, and the process was done by the book.

«These politicians would rather smear private citizens and American small businesses than do any basic research.»

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Alexandra Koch contributed to this report.

Related Article

DHS defends ad blitz amid Senate scrutiny, says campaign drove 2.2M self-deportations and saved taxpayers $39B

kristi noem,hearings,congress,illegal immigrants,advertisements,homeland security

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias