Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

FBI launches criminal investigations of John Brennan, James Comey: DOJ sources

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

EXCLUSIVE: Former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey are under criminal investigation for potential wrongdoing related to the Trump–Russia probe, including allegedly making false statements to Congress, Justice Department sources told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

CIA Director John Ratcliffe referred evidence of wrongdoing by Brennan to FBI Director Kash Patel for potential prosecution, DOJ sources told Fox News Digital.

The sources said that the referral was received and told Fox News Digital that a criminal investigation into Brennan was opened and is underway. DOJ sources declined to provide further details. It is unclear, at this point, if the investigation spans beyond his alleged false statements to Congress.

As for Comey, DOJ sources told Fox News Digital that an investigation into the former director is underway, but could not share details of what specifically is being probed.

Advertisement

EX-OBAMA INTEL BOSS WANTED ANTI-TRUMP DOSSIER INCLUDED IN ‘ATYPICAL’ 2016 ASSESSMENT DESPITE PUSHBACK

The Department of Justice has opened criminal investigations into former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey for potential wrongdoing related to the Trump-Russia probe, Fox News Digital has learned.  (Getty; Reuters)

The full scope of the criminal investigations into Brennan and Comey is unclear, but two sources described the FBI’s view of the duo’s interactions as a «conspiracy,» which could open up a wide range of potential prosecutorial options. 

Advertisement

The FBI and CIA declined to comment.

Neither Brennan nor Comey immediately responded to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

The Brennan investigation comes after Ratcliffe last week declassified a «lessons learned» review of the creation of the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA). The 2017 ICA alleged Russia sought to influence the 2016 presidential election to help then-candidate Donald Trump. But the review found that the process of the ICA’s creation was rushed with «procedural anomalies,» and that officials diverted from intelligence standards. 

Advertisement

WHITE HOUSE WANTS OBAMA INTEL OFFICIALS ‘HELD ACCOUNTABLE’ FOR ROLE PEDDLING 2016 RUSSIA HOAX

Kash Patel speaking

FBI Director Kash Patel during his confirmation hearing in January 2025. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

It also determined that the «decision by agency heads to include the Steele Dossier in the ICA ran counter to fundamental tradecraft principles and ultimately undermined the credibility of a key judgment.» 

The dossier — an anti-Trump document filled with unverified and wholly inaccurate claims that was commissioned by Fusion GPS and paid for by Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the DNC — has been widely discredited. Last week’s review marks the first time career CIA officials have acknowledged politicization of the process by which the ICA was written, particularly by Obama-era political appointees. 

Advertisement

Records declassified as part of that review further revealed that Brennan did, in fact, push for the dossier to be included in the 2017 ICA.

Brennan testified to the House Judiciary Committee in May 2023, however, that he did not believe the dossier should be included in that intelligence product.

COMEY SAYS MCCABE LIED, CONFIRMS HE KICK-STARTED PROBE THAT LED TO HIS FIRING

Advertisement
Senate Confirmation Held To Consider John Ratcliffe To Be CIA Director

CIA Director John Ratcliffe during his confirmation hearing at the Senate Intelligence Committee on January 15, 2025, in Washington.  (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Ratcliffe was not surprised by the review’s findings, a source familiar told Fox News Digital, given the director’s long history of criticizing Brennan’s politicization of intelligence. But Ratcliffe was compelled to refer aspects of Brennan’s involvement to the FBI for review of possible criminality, the source said.

The source was unable to share the sensitive details of Ratcliffe’s criminal referral to the FBI with Fox News Digital, but said that Brennan «violated the public’s trust and should be held accountable for it.»

The false statements portion of the probe stems from a newly declassified email sent to Brennan by the former deputy CIA director in December 2016. That message said that including the dossier in the ICA in any capacity jeopardized «the credibility of the entire paper.»

Advertisement

FISA REPORT DROPS: 7 TAKEAWAYS FROM DOJ WATCHDOG’S REVIEW OF RUSSIA PROBE

John Brennan

Former CIA Director John Brennan arrives to meet with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., about the situation in Iran, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, May 21, 2019.  (J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo)

«Despite these objections, Brennan showed a preference for narrative consistency over analytical soundness,» the new CIA review states. «When confronted with specific flaws in the Dossier by the two mission center leaders – one with extensive operational experience and the other with a strong analytic background – he appeared more swayed by the Dossier’s general conformity with existing theories than by legitimate tradecraft concerns.»

The review added: «Brennan ultimately formalized his position in writing, stating that ‘my bottomline is that I believe that the information warrants inclusion in the report.’»

Advertisement

But Brennan testified the opposite in front of Congress in May 2023.

«The CIA was very much opposed to having any reference or inclusion of the Steele dossier in the Intelligence Community Assessment,» Brennan testified before the House committee, according to the transcript of his deposition reviewed by Fox News Digital. «And so they sent over a copy of the dossier to say that this was going to be separate from the rest of that assessment.»

FLASHBACK: NEWLY DECLASSIFIED INTEL DOCUMENT NOTED STEELE DOSSIER CLAIMS HAD ‘LIMITED CORROBORATION’

Advertisement
John Brennan

Former Director of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) John Brennan testifies before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on Capitol Hill, May 23, 2017 in Washington, DC.  (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

CIA officials at the time of its creation pushed back against the FBI, which sought to include the dossier, arguing that the dossier should not be included in the assessment, and casting it as simply «internet rumor.» 

Ultimately, Steele’s reporting was not included in the body of the final ICA prepared for then-President Barack Obama, but instead detailed in this footnote, «largely at the insistence of FBI’s senior leadership,» according to a review by the Justice Department inspector general, and later, the Senate Intelligence Committee.

But back in June 2020, Ratcliffe, while serving as director of national intelligence, declassified a footnote of the 2017 ICA, which revealed that the reporting of Trump dossier author Christopher Steele had only «limited corroboration» regarding whether then-President-elect Trump «knowingly worked with Russian officials to bolster his chances of beating» Hillary Clinton and other claims.

Advertisement

FLASHBACK: DNI DECLASSIFIES BRENNAN NOTES, CIA MEMO ON HILLARY CLINTON ‘STIRRING UP’ SCANDAL BETWEEN TRUMP, RUSSIA

The footnote, also known as «Annex A» of the 2017 ICA, exclusively obtained by Fox News Digital in June 2020, spanned less than two pages and detailed reporting by Steele, the former British spy who authored the unverified anti-Trump dossier — a document that helped serve as the basis for controversial Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants obtained against former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

Steele’s reporting, at the time, was commissioned by opposition research firm Fusion GPS and funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) through law firm Perkins Coie.

Advertisement

The footnote made clear the internal concerns officials had over that document.

Christopher Steele walking

Ex-British spy Christopher Steele. ( Tolga Akmen/AFP via Getty Images)

«An FBI source (Steele) using both identified and unidentified subsources, volunteered highly politically sensitive information from the summer to the fall of 2016 on Russian influence efforts aimed at the US presidential election,» the annex read. «We have only limited corroboration of the source’s reporting in this case and did not use it to reach the analytic conclusions of the CIA/FBI/NSA assessment.»

«The source collected this information on behalf of private clients and was not compensated for it by the FBI,» it continued.

Advertisement

But the annex notes that Steele’s reporting was «not developed by the layered subsource network.»

«The FBI source caveated that, although similar to previously provided reporting in terms of content, the source was unable to vouch for the additional information’s sourcing and accuracy,» the annex states. «Hence this information is not included in this product.»

FBI IGNORED ‘CLEAR WARNING SIGN’ OF CLINTON-LED EFFORT TO ‘MANIPULATE’ BUREAU FOR ‘POLITICAL PURPOSES’

Advertisement

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz also reviewed the inclusion of Steele’s reporting in the ICA during his review of alleged misconduct related to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA.

His report, released in late 2019, found that there were «significant inaccuracies and omissions» in FISA warrants for former Trump campaign aide Page. Those warrants relied heavily on Steele’s reporting, despite the FBI not having had specific information corroborating allegations against Page that were included in Steele’s reporting.

Meanwhile, Fox News Digital exclusively reported in October 2020 that Brennan briefed former President Obama and administration officials on intelligence that then-Democrat nominee former Secretary of State Clinton was stirring up a plan to tie Trump to Russia.

Advertisement

Ratcliffe, as director of national intelligence, declassified Brennan’s handwritten notes memorializing that meeting, which were exclusively obtained by Fox News Digital in October 2020.

Hillary-Clinton-Donald-Trump

Then-Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks as then-Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump listens during the town hall debate at Washington University on October 9, 2016 in St Louis, Missouri. (Rick Wilking-Pool/Getty Images)

On July 28, 2016, Brennan briefed Obama on a plan from one of Clinton’s campaign foreign policy advisors «to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service.» 

Comey, then-Vice President Joe Biden, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper were in the Brennan-Obama briefing.

Advertisement

FLASHBACK: DECLASSIFIED TRUMP-RUSSIA PROBE DOCS TO DATE: WHAT TO KNOW 

After that briefing, the CIA properly forwarded that information through a Counterintelligence Operational Lead (CIOL) to Comey and then-Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Peter Strzok, with the subject line: «Crossfire Hurricane.»

Fox News Digital exclusively obtained and reported on the CIOL in October 2020, which stated: «The following information is provided for the exclusive use of your bureau for background investigative action or lead purposes as appropriate.»

Advertisement

«Per FBI verbal request, CIA provides the below examples of information the CROSSFIRE HURRICANE fusion cell has gleaned to date,» the memo continued. «An exchange (REDACTED) discussing US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s approval of a plan concerning US presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering US elections as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.»

The FBI on July 31, 2016, opened a counterintelligence investigation into whether candidate Trump and members of his campaign were colluding or coordinating with Russia to influence the 2016 campaign. That investigation was referred to inside the bureau as «Crossfire Hurricane.»

Robert Mueller

In this May 29, 2019, file photo, Special counsel Robert Mueller speaks at the Department of Justice in Washington, about the Russia investigation. (Carolyn Kaster/AP Photo)

Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller was appointed to take over the FBI’s original «Crossfire Hurricane» investigation. After nearly two years, Mueller’s investigation, which concluded in March 2019, yielded no evidence of criminal conspiracy or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russian officials during the 2016 presidential election.

Advertisement

Shortly after, John Durham was appointed as special counsel to investigate the origins of the «Crossfire Hurricane» probe.

Durham found that the FBI «failed to act» on a «clear warning sign» that the bureau was the «target» of a Clinton-led effort to «manipulate or influence the law enforcement process for political purposes» ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

«The aforementioned facts reflect a rather startling and inexplicable failure to adequately consider and incorporate the Clinton Plan intelligence into the FBI’s investigative decision-making in the Crossfire Hurricane investigation,» Durham’s report states.

Advertisement
John Durham

Special Counsel John Durham indicated the Department of Justice and FBI «failed to uphold their mission of strict fidelity to the law» when it launched the Trump-Russia investigation. (Ron Sachs/Consolidated News Pictures/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«Indeed, had the FBI opened the Crossfire Hurricane investigation as an assessment and, in turn, gathered and analyzed data in concert with the information from the Clinton Plan intelligence, it is likely that the information received would have been examined, at a minimum, with a more critical eye,» the report continued.

Durham, in his report, said the FBI «failed to act on what should have been—when combined with other incontrovertible facts— a clear warning sign that the FBI might then be the target of an effort to manipulate or influence the law enforcement process for political purposes during the 2016 presidential election.»

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the White House wants the Obama-era intelligence officials to be held accountable. 

«President Trump was right — again,» White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to Fox News Digital. «Those who engaged in this political scandal must be held accountable for the fraud they committed against President Trump and the lies they told to the American people.»

Advertisement
Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Astronautas de la Crew-10 de SpaceX completaron su misión y regresaron a la Tierra tras cinco meses en la Estación Espacial Internacional

Published

on


En esta imagen proporcionada por la NASA, la cápsula SpaceX con cuatro astronautas a bordo ameriza en paracaídas en el océano Pacífico, frente a la costa sur de California, este sábado 9 de agosto de 2025 (Keegan Barber/NASA vía AP)

Cuatro astronautas regresaron este sábado a la Tierra tras casi cinco meses en la Estación Espacial Internacional (EEI), según informó el Centro Espacial Kennedy de la NASA. La tripulación, conformada por Anne McClain y Nichole Ayers de la NASA, Takuya Onishi de la Agencia de Exploración Aeroespacial de Japón (JAXA) y Kirill Peskov de Roscosmos, amerizó a las 8:33 horas del Pacífico estadounidense (15:33 GMT) frente a la costa de California, después de desacoplarse de la estación el viernes.

La cápsula Dragon, desarrollada por SpaceX, descendió en el océano Pacífico guiada por paracaídas, completando así la expedición tras 148 días en el laboratorio orbital. El amerizaje marcó la primera vez en casi 50 años que astronautas de NASA retornaron al Pacífico, la última ocasión había sido durante la histórica misión Apollo-Soyuz en 1975, cuando astronautas estadounidenses y soviéticos se encontraron en órbita.

Advertisement

Además, es la primera vez que una misión del programa de vuelos tripulados comerciales aterriza frente a las costas de California, desde que SpaceX decidió cambiar el punto de retorno de Florida a la costa oeste del país para reducir el riesgo de caída de escombros sobre áreas pobladas.

Durante su estancia en la EEI, la tripulación de la Crew-10 realizó una serie de investigaciones científicas destinadas a facilitar futuras misiones fuera de la órbita baja terrestre, según informó la NASA. Parte de esos experimentos estuvo compuesto por estudios biomédicos y tecnológicos, así como investigaciones sensibles al tiempo, tantas de ellas transportadas de regreso a la Tierra para su análisis inmediato.

Esta imagen proporcionada por la
Esta imagen proporcionada por la NASA muestra, de izquierda a derecha, a los miembros de la tripulación SpaceX Crew-10 de la NASA: el astronauta Takuya Onishi de la JAXA (Agencia de Exploración Aeroespacial de Japón), las astronautas de la NASA Anne McClain y Nichole Ayers, y el cosmonauta Kirill Peskov de Roscosmos, posando para una foto dentro de la nave espacial SpaceX Dragon que los llevó a la Estación Espacial Internacional y los trajo de vuelta a la Tierra (NASA vía AP)

La misión Crew-10 tiene una relevancia especial debido a su papel en la rotación de tripulaciones en la EEI. Según la fuente, los astronautas llegaron a la estación espacial el pasado 16 de marzo tras despegar desde el Centro Espacial Kennedy en Florida, con el objetivo de reemplazar a los tripulantes asignados previamente al fallido vuelo de demostración de la cápsula Starliner de Boeing. El prolongado fallo en el sistema del nuevo vehículo mantuvo a los astronautas Butch Wilmore y Suni Williams en la estación espacial más de nueve meses, muy por encima de la semana originalmente planeada, lo que llevó a NASA a ordenar el regreso del Starliner vacío y cambiar a la pareja a un vuelo de SpaceX.

Durante su retorno, McClain hizo referencia a “tiempos tumultuosos en la Tierra”, subrayando el valor de la cooperación internacional en la exploración espacial y la capacidad de la humanidad de trabajar unida ante desafíos globales. La comandante señaló que, tras el regreso, esperaba descansar unos días en Houston, mientras que el resto de la tripulación expresó entusiasmo por disfrutar de comodidades como duchas calientes y hamburguesas frescas, tras varios meses en el ambiente cerrado de la EEI.

Advertisement
La cápsula SpaceX amerizó frente
La cápsula SpaceX amerizó frente a la costa sur de California este sábado (Keegan Barber/NASA vía AP)

Este décimo viaje operativo de SpaceX a la EEI destaca por el uso continuado de la cápsula Dragon como medio seguro de traslado entre la órbita y la superficie terrestre. La elección del Pacífico como zona de amerizaje responde a criterios de seguridad, asegurando tanto la integridad de la tripulación como la protección de las muestras científicas, muchas de ellas sumamente sensibles al tiempo y requeridas para experimentos en la Tierra apenas horas después del aterrizaje.

A esta tripulación la ha reemplazado ya la misión Crew-11, que permanecerá durante los próximos meses a bordo del laboratorio orbital, continuando con el programa de investigación de la NASA y sus socios internacionales.

(Con información de AP y EFE)



calif.,commercial crew program,crew dragon,crew-10,crew-10 landing,expedition 73,expedition 73 landing,jaxa (japan aerospace exploration agency),roscosmos,san diego,spacex

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Volodimir Zelenski rechaza ceder territorio ucraniano y exige que Kiev participe en las negociaciones para el fin de la guerra

Published

on


El presidente de Ucrania, Volodimir Zelenski, rechazó el sábado la idea de que su país ceda territorio para poner fin a la guerra con Rusia después de que el presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, sugirió que un acuerdo de paz podría incluir «algún intercambio de territorios».

Zelenski aseguró que Ucrania «no dará a Rusia ningún premio por lo que ha hecho» y que “los ucranianos no entregarán su tierra al ocupante”.

Advertisement

La dura reacción llegó después de que Trump dijo el viernes que se reuniría con Vladimir Putin incluso si el líder ruso no hablaba con Zelenski. El encuentro entre Trump y Putin, previsto para el próximo viernes en Alaska, se considera un posible avance en la guerra que dura ya más de tres años.

El líder ucraniano desestimó la cumbre prevista, y advirtió que cualquier negociación para poner fin al mayor conflicto en Europa desde la Segunda Guerra Mundial debe incluir a Kiev.

“Cualquier solución sin Ucrania, es al mismo tiempo una solución contra la paz. No aportará nada. Son soluciones muertas, nunca funcionarán”, afirmó.

Advertisement
Donald Trump y Vladimir Putin, durante una cumbre en Vietnam, en noviembre de 2017. Foto: REUTERS

En un comunicado publicado en Telegram, Zelenski afirmó que la integridad territorial de Ucrania, consagrada en su Constitución, debe ser innegociable e hizo hincapié en que una paz duradera debe incluir la voz de Ucrania en la mesa de negociación.

Funcionarios ucranianos habían dicho antes en privado a The Associated Press que Kiev estaría dispuesto a aceptar un acuerdo de paz que reconozca de facto la incapacidad del país para recuperar los territorios perdidos militarmente.

La cumbre entre Putin y Trump

Advertisement

La reunión entre Trump y Putin podría resultar crucial en una guerra que comenzó cuando Rusia invadió a su vecino occidental, en febrero de 2022, y ha causado decenas de miles de muertes, aunque no hay garantías de que frene los combates, puesto que Moscú y Kiev siguen muy alejadas en sus exigencias para la paz.

«Parece completamente lógico que nuestra delegación simplemente cruce el estrecho de Bering, y que una cumbre tan importante y esperada entre los líderes de los dos países se celebre en Alaska», apuntó el asesor de Asuntos Exteriores de Putin, Yuri Ushakov, el sábado en un comunicado publicado en el canal de noticias del Kremlin.

En declaraciones a reporteros en la Casa Blanca el viernes, Trump no ofreció detalles sobre el «intercambio de territorios». Analistas, incluyendo algunos próximos al Kremlin, han sugerido que Moscú podría ofrecer ceder territorios que controla fuera de las cuatro provincias ucranianas que afirma haber anexado.

Advertisement

Trump señaló que su reunión con Putin se celebrará antes de cualquier discusión con Zelenski. El anuncio de que planeaba recibir a uno de los principales adversarios de Washington en suelo estadounidense rompió con las expectativas de que se reunieran en un tercer país. El gesto valida a Putin después de que la Casa Blanca y sus aliados hayan buscado durante mucho tiempo convertirlo en un paria por su guerra contra Ucrania.

Nigel Gould-Davies, investigador asociado de Chatham House, dijo a The Associated Press que la «simbología» de celebrar la cumbre en Alaska era clara y que la ubicación «naturalmente favorece a Rusia».

«Es fácil imaginar a Putin argumentando ‘en su día tuvimos este territorio y se lo dimos a ustedes, por lo tanto, Ucrania tenía este territorio y ahora debería dárnoslo’», afirmó refiriéndose a la transacción de 1867 conocida como la Compra de Alaska, cuando Rusia vendió el territorio a Estados Unidos por 7,2 millones de dólares.

Advertisement
Fuego y humo tras un ataque de Rusia en la región de Donetsk, en Ucrania, este sábado. Foto. REUTERS Fuego y humo tras un ataque de Rusia en la región de Donetsk, en Ucrania, este sábado. Foto. REUTERS

Reacciones en Ucrania

En las calles de Kiev, las reacciones a la idea de que Ucrania ceda territorio a Rusia variaron desde el escepticismo hasta la resignación silenciosa.

“No puede ser una capitulación, pero sería una pérdida”, dijo Ihor Usatenko, un pensionista de 67 años, quien consideraría ceder territorio “con la condición de recibir compensación y, posiblemente, algunas reparaciones”.

Anastasia Yemelianova, de 31 años, dijo que estaba dividida: “Honestamente, tengo dos respuestas a esa pregunta. La primera es como persona que ama a su país. No quiero comprometerme dentro de mí misma”, dijo a la AP. “Pero al ver todas estas muertes y sabiendo que mi madre ahora vive en Nikopol bajo bombardeos y mi padre está luchando, quiero que todo esto termine lo antes posible”.

Advertisement

Otros, como Svitlana Dobrynska, cuyo hijo murió luchando, rechazaron de plano las concesiones pero apoyaron detener el combate para salvar vidas.

“No tenemos la oportunidad de lanzar una ofensiva para recuperar nuestros territorios”, dijo la pensionista de 57 años, “pero para evitar que la gente muera, podemos simplemente detener las operaciones militares, firmar algún tipo de acuerdo, pero no ceder nuestros territorios”.

Ultimátum y sanciones

Advertisement

Exasperado porque Putin no atendió sus llamados para frenar los bombardeos contra ciudades ucranianas, Trump adelantó su ultimátum para imponer sanciones adicionales a Rusia y aranceles secundarios a países que compran petróleo ruso si el Kremlin no avanzaba hacia un acuerdo.

El plazo finalizaba el viernes. Pero la Casa Blanca no respondió esa noche a preguntas sobre el estado de las posibles sanciones después de que Trump anunció los detalles de su próxima reunión con Putin.

Un vehículo militar de Ucrania patrulla una zona de combate, cerca de la localidad de Chasiv Yar, en la región de Donetsk. Foto: REUTERS Un vehículo militar de Ucrania patrulla una zona de combate, cerca de la localidad de Chasiv Yar, en la región de Donetsk. Foto: REUTERS

Antes del anuncio de la cumbre, los esfuerzos de Trump para presionar a Rusia para frenar los combates no habían dado resultados. El ejército ruso, que es más grande que el ucraniano, se adentra lentamente en suelo rival a un gran costo en cuanto tropas y armamento, mientras bombardea de forma implacable las ciudades del país.

Más ataques con drones

Advertisement

Dos personas murieron y otras 16 resultaron heridas el sábado por el impacto de un avión no tripulado ruso en un minibús en los suburbios de la ciudad ucraniana de Jerson, dijo el gobernador de la región, Oleksandr Prokudin. Otras dos personas fallecieron después de que un dron ruso alcanzara su auto en la provincia de Zaporiyia, indicó el gobernador, Ivan Fedorov.

La fuerza aérea de Ucrania dijo el sábado que interceptó 16 de los 47 drones rusos lanzados durante la noche, mientras que los otros 31 alcanzaron objetivos en 15 ubicaciones diferentes. También afirmó haber derribado uno de los dos misiles desplegados por las tropas del Kremlin.

Por su parte, el Ministerio de Defensa ruso dijo que sus defensas antiaéreas derribaron 97 aviones no tripulados ucranianos sobre territorio ruso y el mar Negro durante la noche del sábado, y 21 más el sábado por la mañana.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Democratic strategist says party lacks ‘moral authority’ on Texas redistricting fight

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Democrats are fighting tooth and nail to stop Texas lawmakers’ plan to redraw the state’s congressional map, but critics, including one prominent member of their own party, say they don’t exactly hold the moral high ground.

Advertisement

Democrat legislators have fled the state to avoid votes on redistricting, which is expected to add more Republican seats to Congress for the Lone Star State. They’re getting the rock-star treatment as they visit blue states, where several governors have vowed to gerrymander Republicans out of their own Congressional delegations in retaliation for the Texas effort.

CALIFORNIA LAUNCHES REDISTRICTING FIGHT TO ‘NULLIFY’ TEXAS GOP PLAN, WITH DEMS POISED TO GAIN 5 SEATS

Texas state lawmakers board a bus following a press conference at the DuPage County Democratic Party headquarters on August 03, 2025 in Carol Stream, Illinois. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Advertisement

However, Democratic strategist Julian Epstein told «Fox News Live» on Saturday that his party is not immune from criticism, as many blue states have already gerrymandered in a way that limits Republican congressional representation.

«No, I think they don’t have the moral authority, and there’s a lot of pearl-clutching going on,» he said.

Several blue states, including Massachusetts, Connecticut and New Mexico, have no Republicans in their House delegations. And many feature oddly-drawn districts, seemingly crafted to limit GOP representation.

Advertisement

«The Democrats don’t have clean hands here. You look at states like Massachusetts, New Jersey[…] Illinois, California, and Democrats have effectively gerrymandered Republicans out of existence,» Epstein added.

NETWORKS POUNCE ON REPUBLICAN REDISTRICTING. THEY DIDN’T CARE WHEN DEMOCRATS DID IT

Texas Dems flee to Chicago, New York and Boston

J.B. Pritzker, governor of Illinois, left, and State Representative Gene Wu, a Democrat from Texas, during a news conference at the Democratic Party of DuPage County office in Carol Stream, Illinois, US, on Sunday, Aug. 3, 2025. 

Epstein cautioned that the nationwide redistricting battle could create a «race to the bottom,» and that leaving Republicans and Democrats in states led by the opposite parties could lead to people feeling left out of the democratic process. Epstein cited New Jersey, in which Trump garnered 46% of the vote in 2024, but Republicans only have three out of the 12 congressional seats.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Texas state Rep. Brian Harrison, a Republican, told Fox News Digital on Saturday that Democrats are guilty of «total hypocrisy and faux outrage.»

«The dirty little secret is Democrats have no problem whatsoever with states redrawing their congressional maps to maximize partisan political advantage. They’re just furious that Republican states are starting to redraw their maps,» Harrison said.

TEXAS DEMOCRATS FLEE STATE TO BLOCK TRUMP-BACKED REDISTRICTING VOTE IN DRAMATIC LEGISLATIVE MOVE

Advertisement
California Governor Gavin Newsom at an event

California Gov. Gavin Newsom attends a press conference, July 2, 2025 in Burbank, California. (Carlin Stiehl / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

«It’s because Democrat state after Democrat state, for a decade, has been gerrymandering the hell out of their congressional maps,» he said.

«Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont, Rhode Island, Delaware, all of these states have zero. If you’re a Republican in those Democrat states, you don’t have any voice in Congress,» he added. «And [there are] many, many more that have given you just one seat, Oregon, I think Maine and Maryland.»

In California, a special election is likely to occur in November to counteract the Texas redistricting plan.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«We are talking about emergency measures to respond to what’s happening in Texas, and we will nullify what happens in Texas,» California Gov. Gavin Newsom said on Friday with some Texas state lawmakers.

«We’ll pick up five seats with the consent of the people. And that’s the difference between the approach we’re taking and the approach they’re taking,» Newsom added. «We’re doing it on a temporary basis. We’re doing it in a fully transparent way and we’re doing it by asking the people of the state of California for their consent and support.»

Advertisement

Harrison explained that Texas’s redistricting push has numerous reasons behind it, including the population growth in the Lone Star state since the last census. 

texas,california,congress,illinois

Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias