Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Federal judge limits Trump’s ability to deport Abrego Garcia after lengthy court battle

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A federal judge in Maryland issued an emergency ruling Wednesday blocking the Trump administration from immediately taking Salvadorian migrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia into ICE custody for 72 hours after he is released from criminal custody in Nashville, Tennessee — attempting to slow, if only temporarily, a case at the center of a legal and political maelstrom.

Advertisement

U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis said in her order that the government must refrain from immediately taking Abrego into ICE custody pending release from criminal custody in Tennessee, and ordered he be returned to the ICE Order of Supervision at the Baltimore Field Office— the closest ICE facility near the district of Maryland where Abrego was arrested earlier this year. 

Xinis said at an evidentiary hearing this month that she would take action soon, in anticipation of a looming detention hearing for Abrego Garcia in his criminal case. She said she planned to issue the order with sufficient time to block the Trump administration’s stated plans to immediately begin the process of deporting Abrego Garcia again upon release — this time to a third country such as Mexico or South Sudan.

Xinis’s order said the additional time will ensure Abrego can raise any credible fears of removal to a third country, and via «the appropriate channels in the immigration process.» She also ordered the government to provide Abrego and his attorneys with «immediate written notice» of plans to transport him to a third country, again with the 72-hour notice period, «so that Abrego Garcia may assert claims of credible fear or seek any other relief available to him under the law and the Constitution.»

Advertisement

TRUMP HAS CUSTODY OVER JAILED CECOT MIGRANTS, EL SALVADOR SAYS, COMPLICATING COURT FIGHTS

Demonstrators gather outside the U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, Maryland, to protest the Trump administration’s deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was sent to El Salvador in March in what administration officials said was an administrative error, on July 7, 2025.  (Breanne Deppisch/Fox News Digital)

Xinis said in her order Wednesday that the 72-hour notice period is necessary «to prevent a repeat of Abrego Garcia’s unlawful deportation to El Salvador by way of third-country removal.»

Advertisement

«Defendants have taken no concrete steps to ensure that any prospective third country would not summarily return Abrego Garcia to El Salvador in an end-run around the very withholding order that offers him uncontroverted protection,» she said.

The order from Xinis, who presided over Abrego Garcia’s civil case, was ultimately handed down on Wednesday just two minutes after a federal judge in Nashville — U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw — issued a separate order, upholding a lower judge’s decision that Abrego should be released from criminal custody pending trial in January.

Crenshaw said in his order that the government failed to provide «any evidence that there is something in Abrego’s history at warrants detention.» 

Advertisement

The plans, which Xinis ascertained over the course of a multi-day evidentiary hearing earlier this month, capped an exhausting, 19-week legal saga in the case of Abrego Garcia that spanned two continents, multiple federal courts, including the Supreme Court, and inspired countless hours of news coverage.

Still, it ultimately yielded little in the way of new answers, and Xinis likened the process to «nailing Jell-O to a wall,» and «beating a frustrated and dead horse,» among other things.

«We operate as government of laws,» she scolded lawyers for the Trump administration in one of many terse exchanges. «We don’t operate as a government of ’take my word for it.’» 

Advertisement

FEDERAL JUDGE EXTENDS ARGUMENTS IN ABREGO GARCIA CASE, SLAMS ICE WITNESS WHO ‘KNEW NOTHING’

A person holds up a sign referencing the Centre for Terrorism Confinement (CECOT) prison in El Salvador during a May Day demonstration against US President Donald Trump and his immigration policies in Houston, Texas, on May 1, 2025. (Photo by RONALDO SCHEMIDT / AFP)

A person holds up a sign referencing the the CECOT prison in El Salvador during demonstration against President Donald Trump and his immigration policies in Houston, Texas, on May 1, 2025. (Photo: AFP va Getty Images) (AFP via Getty)

Xinis had repeatedly floated the notion of a temporary restraining order, or TRO, to ensure certain safeguards were in place to keep Abrego Garcia in ICE custody, and appeared to agree with his attorneys that such an order is likely needed to prevent their client from being removed again, without access to counsel or without a chance to appeal his country of removal.

«I’m just trying to understand what you’re trying to do,» Xinis said on more than one occasion, growing visibly frustrated. 

Advertisement

«I’m deeply concerned that if there’s no restraint on you, Abrego will be on another plane to another country,» she told the Justice Department, noting pointedly that «that’s what you’ve done in other cases.»

Those concerns were echoed repeatedly by Abrego Garcia’s attorneys in a court filing earlier this month.

They noted the number of times that the Trump administration has appeared to have undercut or misrepresented its position before the court in months past, as Xinis attempted to ascertain the status of Abrego Garcia in El Salvador, and what efforts, if any, the Trump administration was making to comply with a court order to facilitate his return.

Advertisement

The Trump administration, who reiterated their belief that the case is no longer in her jurisdiction, will almost certainly move to immediately appeal the restraining order to a higher court.

TRUMP HAS CUSTODY OVER JAILED CECOT MIGRANTS, EL SALVADOR SAYS, COMPLICATING COURT FIGHTS

Demonstrators gather on Boston Common, cheering and chanting slogans, during the nationwide "Hands Off!" protest against US President Donald Trump and his advisor, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, in Boston, Massachusetts on April 5, 2025. (Photo by Joseph Prezioso / AFP) (Photo by JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images)

Demonstrators gather cheering and chanting slogans, during the nationwide «Hands Off!» protest against Trump in Boston, Massachusetts on April 5, 2025.  (Joseph Prezioso / AFP via Getty)

The order comes two weeks after an extraordinary, multi-day evidentiary hearing in Greenbelt, Maryland, where Xinis sparred with Trump administration officials as she attempted to make sense of their remarks and ascertain their next steps as they look to deport Abrego Garcia to a third country.

Advertisement

She said she planned to issue the order before the date that Abrego could possibly be released from federal custody— a request made by lawyers for Abrego Garcia, who asked the court for more time in criminal custody, citing the many countries he might suffer persecution in — and concerns about what legal status he would have in the third country of removal. 

Without legal status in Mexico, Xinis said, it would likely be a «quick road» to being deported by the country’s government to El Salvador, in violation of the withholding of removal order. 

And in South Sudan, another country DHS is apparently considering, lawyers for Abrego noted the State Department currently has a Level 4 advisory in place discouraging U.S. travel due to violence and armed conflict. 

Advertisement

Americans who do travel there should «draft a will» beforehand and designate insurance beneficiaries, according to official guidance on the site.

 FEDERAL PROSECUTORS TELL JUDGE THEY WILL DEPORT KILMAR ABREGO GARCIA TO A THIRD COUNTRY AFTER DETENTION

Abrego Garcia's attorneys speak to reporters outside the U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, Maryland, in July. (Breanne Deppisch/Fox News Digital)

Abrego Garcia’s attorneys speak to reporters outside the U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, Maryland, in July. (Breanne Deppisch/Fox News Digital) (Breanne Deppisch/Fox News Digital)

In court, both in July and in earlier hearings, Xinis struggled to keep her own frustration and her incredulity at bay after months of back-and-forth with Justice Department attorneys.

Advertisement

Xinis has presided over Abrego Garcia’s civil case since March, when he was deported to El Salvador in violation of an existing court order in what Trump administration officials described as an «administrative error.»

She spent hours pressing Justice Department officials, over the course of three separate hearings, for details on the government’s plans for removing Abrego Garcia to a third country — a process she likened to «trying to nail Jell-O to a wall.» 

Xinis chastised the Justice Department this month for presenting a DHS witness to testify under oath about ICE’s plans to deport Abrego Garcia, fuming that the official, Thomas Giles, «knew nothing» about his case, and made no effort to ascertain answers — despite his rank as ICE’s third-highest enforcement official. 

Advertisement

The four hours of testimony he provided was «fairly stunning,» and «insulting to her intelligence,» Xinis said. 

Ultimately, the court would not allow the «unfettered release» of Abrego Garcia pending release from federal custody in Tennessee without «full-throated assurances» from the Trump administration that it will keep Abrego Garcia in ICE custody for a set period of time and locally, Xinis said, to ensure immigration officials do not «spirit him away to Nome, Alaska.»

During the July hearing, Judge Xinis notably declined to weigh in on the request for sanctions filed by lawyers for Abrego Garcia, but alluded to it in her ruling Wednesday.

Advertisement

«Defendants’ defiance and foot- dragging are, to be sure, the subject of a separate sanctions motion,» she said in the ruling— indicating further steps could be taken as she attempts to square months of differing statements from Trump officials. 

«The Court will not recount this troubling history in detail, other than to note Defendants’ persistent lack of transparency with the tribunal adds to why further injunctive relief is warranted,» she said. 

TRUMP’S REMARKS COULD COME BACK TO BITE HIM IN ABREGO GARCIA DEPORTATION BATTLE

Advertisement
Paula Xinis testifies before Senate

This still from video from July 22, 2015 show Paula Xinis from US Senate Judiciary Committee (US Senate Judiciary Committee)

The Justice Department, after a short recess, declined to agree, prompting Xinis to proceed with her plans for the TRO.

Xinis told the court that ultimately, «much delta» remains between where they ended things in court, and what she is comfortable with, given the government’s actions in the past.

This was apparent on multiple occasions Friday, when Xinis told lawyers for the Trump administration that she «isn’t buying» their arguments or doesn’t «have faith» in the statements they made — reflecting an erosion of trust that could prove damaging in the longer-term.

Advertisement

The hearings this week capped months of back-and-forth between Xinis and the Trump administration, as she tried, over the course of 19 weeks, to track the status of a single migrant deported erroneously by the Trump administration to El Salvador—and to trace what attempts, if any, they had made facilitate his return to the U.S.

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Xinis previously took aim at what she deemed to be the lack of information submitted to the court as part of an expedited discovery process she ordered this year, describing the government’s submissions as «vague, evasive and incomplete»— and which she said demonstrated «willful and bad faith refusal to comply with discovery obligations.»

Advertisement

On Friday, she echoed this view. «You have taken the presumption of regularity and you’ve destroyed it, in my view,» Xinis said. 

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Backlash grows after Clinton-appointed judge frees migrants over ICE agent masking

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A Bill Clinton-appointed federal judge is among several drawing criticism for continuing to order the release of some of the 650 illegal immigrants arrested by ICE in Operation Country Roads.

Advertisement

In one case that drew public attention, Judge Joseph Goodwin of the Southern District of West Virginia granted the release of Salvadoran national Anderson Jesus Urquilla-Ramos, a decision the man’s attorney told Bloomberg Law «reinforces that immigration enforcement must operate within constitutional limits.»

In his order, Goodwin lashed out at ICE agents’ masks and warrant-free arrests, saying «antiseptic judicial rhetoric cannot do justice to what is happening.»

Goodwin characterized DHS’ behavior as an «assault on the constitutional order [and] what the Fourth Amendment was written to prevent,» according to WVMetroNews, and he permitted habeas corpus, a detained defendant’s ability to challenge his confinement.

Advertisement

ICE and DHS agents make an arrest.  (Mostafa Bassim/Getty Images)

In Goodwin’s order releasing Yuri Aroca and Arley Valenzuela, he lambasted their detention after a traffic stop along the West Virginia Turnpike near Pax, West Virginia.

«I am not blind to the practical demands of immigration enforcement, including cooperation between state and federal authorities, but the Constitution presupposed restraint as the default of lawful authority,» he wrote in his ruling.

Advertisement

Rep. Carol Miller, R-W.V., who represents the southern half of the state, did not hold back in her response to the situation.

«If Judge Goodwin experienced even 1% of the threats and harassment that ICE officers receive, he might have had the courage to make a ruling based on the law and not his personal political agenda,» Miller said.

«Thankfully, he, his family and his home are free from the fear of doxxing and danger coming from the radical leftists — our ICE agents are not as fortunate.»

Advertisement

Miller said masking protects ICE agents from those who want to harm them and keeps their families out of the «crosshairs of the mobs that continue to terrorize our cities.»

FEDERAL JUDGE STRIKES DOWN LARGE PARTS OF TRUMP MASS DETENTION POLICIES FOR MIGRANTS

carol-smith

Rep. Carol Miller, R-W.V.   (Bill Clark)

Operation Country Roads netted hundreds of illegal immigrants from Charles Town in the north to Beckley in the south, and many of the cases fall within the Charleston-based Southern District of West Virginia.

Advertisement

Moore Capito, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of West Virginia, defended the state’s partnership with federal law enforcement in comments to Fox News Digital.

«We in the Southern District of West Virginia have the most committed and cooperative law enforcement partners that you will find,» Capito said.

«Day after day, they are on the front lines working to keep our communities safe. Our officers take precautions to protect themselves and their families from retaliation, the same way members of the judiciary rely on institutional protections every day.»

Advertisement

Capito said his office will continue to support law enforcement while responding to several petitions, adding that the cases involving the now-released individuals are ripe for appeal.

In one of his orders, Goodwin wrote that «no specific danger has been identified that required these agents to be masked for this arrest,» a statement the White House took particular exception to.

«ICE officers are facing a 1,300% increase in assaults against them because of dangerous, untrue smears from elected Democrats,» spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

«ICE officers wear masks to protect themselves and their families from being doxxed. ICE officers act heroically to enforce the law and protect American communities with the utmost professionalism. Anyone pointing the finger at law enforcement officers instead of the criminals is simply doing the bidding of criminal illegal aliens.»

An Obama-appointed judge, Irene Berger, who also recently blunted a key tenet of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s «MAHA» agenda, ordered the similarly reasoned release of a noncitizen big rig driver detained at the Ghent Toll Plaza on the turnpike.

Rep. Riley Moore, R-W.V., who represents the northern half of the state, including Jefferson County, where local law enforcement collaborated with ICE to quickly remove suspects from the streets, agreed with Miller that judges should understand the dangers faced by agents.

Advertisement

«ICE agents are being doxxed, and their families are being attacked by radical leftists just for doing their jobs,» Moore told Fox News Digital.

«We’ve seen time and again what violent leftists are capable of, and our ICE agents should never be subjected to this terrible treatment.»

FEDERAL JUDGE RELEASES FOUR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS CONVICTED OF MURDER, SEX CRIMES FROM ICE CUSTODY

Advertisement

Moore called Goodwin’s ruling «shameful» and said it puts ideology above protecting American families.

«I am grateful to the brave ICE agents who are doing their duty to defend America,» he said. Gov. Patrick Morrisey shared the sentiment.

«We stand with President Trump, the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and we are confident that as these cases move through the justice system, the court will find that the protection and safety of federal agents is constitutional,» Morrisey told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

«We also stand firmly with ICE. The safety of law enforcement officers is paramount.»

Morrisey said that threats of doxxing, targeted harassment and violence are «very real.»

«There is a clear need to protect those who serve,» he said, disagreeing with the tact from the bench.

Advertisement

«These men and women put themselves in harm’s way to enforce the law, and we will always stand alongside our fellow officers.»

Some released individuals named President Donald Trump as a defendant, signaling the federal government would be the party to appeal. Others listed West Virginia corrections official Christopher Mason, ICE Director Todd Lyons and Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Asked about the cases and what next steps might be, a Justice Department spokesperson told Fox News Digital that concerns over agents’ tactics and masking have been «reaffirmed» through a recent California court case.

Advertisement

«Laws banning federal agents from wearing protective masks are unconstitutional,» the spokesperson said.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«This Department of Justice is focused on law and order, public safety, and will not tolerate any violence directed toward law enforcement officials working tirelessly to keep Americans safe, despite the best efforts of activist judges who’d rather see violent illegal criminals walk free.»  

Advertisement

Fox News Digital reached out to the rest of West Virginia’s delegation — Sens. Jim Justice II and Shelley Moore Capito — for comment.

Related Article

Federal judge’s ‘unhinged’ order in migrant case ignites Republican fury, impeachment demand

police and law enforcement,immigration,federal judges,illegal immigrants,justice department,in court

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Tras décadas oculto en el Museo de Historia Natural de Chile, identifican una nueva especie de pulpo

Published

on


Un ejemplar de Pulpo Graneledone sellanesi, de tonalidad rojiza y piel granulada, se observa en el lecho marino arenoso con puntos láser para medición. (Foto: cortesía Javier Sellanes)

Un equipo de científicos chilenos identificó una nueva especie de pulpo de aguas profundas en el Pacífico suroriental. El anuncio, realizado en Santiago de Chile, involucra a académicos del Departamento de Ecología y Biodiversidad de la Universidad Andrés Bello. El hallazgo responde a la pregunta sobre qué nuevas formas de vida habitan las profundidades del océano en esa región.

La investigación, publicada en la Revista de Ciencias Marinas e Ingeniería, señala que los ejemplares fueron encontrados entre los años 1980 y 2007 y permanecieron sin identificar en colecciones biológicas internacionales y chilenas. La nueva especie pertenece al género Graneledone y recibió el nombre de Graneledone Sellanesi.

Advertisement

El descubrimiento destaca la riqueza oculta de la fauna marina y sugiere la existencia de especies aún no documentadas en la zona.

Los investigadores María Cecilia Pardo y Christian Ibáñez lideraron el trabajo y eligieron el nombre en homenaje a Javier Sellanes, académico de la Universidad Católica del Norte de Chile y referente en la investigación oceánica nacional. Según los investigadores, este hallazgo representa la primera identificación de una nueva especie de Graneledone en 25 años. El género ahora suma once especies reconocidas a nivel mundial, lo que reafirma la importancia del Pacífico suroriental como un reservorio clave de biodiversidad marina.

Equipo de investigación chileno responsable
Equipo de investigación chileno responsable del descubrimiento, junto a colecciones biológicas históricas. (Foto: cortesía Javier Sellanes)

El avance científico fue posible gracias al análisis de ejemplares conservados en museos de Alemania, Estados Unidos, Nueva Zelanda y Chile. Siete de estos ejemplares, recolectados por el Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Santiago, permanecieron décadas sin identificar. Un ejemplar adicional apareció en 2007 durante una captura de bacalao y nunca se clasificó oficialmente. El estudio sistemático de estos especímenes permitió confirmar la existencia de una especie única. El equipo analizó rasgos fenotípicos, como las verrugas que cubren la piel, cuyo número y disposición resultaron determinantes para distinguir al nuevo pulpo de otras especies del género descubierto.

El hallazgo pone en valor el trabajo de los museos y la importancia de revisar ejemplares históricos.

Advertisement

Las colecciones biológicas internacionales y chilenas guardaban ejemplares desde hace décadas. Muchos de estos pulpos permanecieron sin clasificar, esperando una revisión exhaustiva. Los registros más antiguos corresponden a capturas realizadas entre 1980 y 1997 en el sur de Chile. El análisis de los ejemplares observaciones morfológicas detalladas, que permitieron identificar características únicas de la nueva especie.

Además, la colaboración internacional resultó clave para reunir información suficiente y confirmar la singularidad del Graneledone Sellanesi. Según los investigadores, la revisión de especímenes conservados contribuye a esclarecer la diversidad marina del Pacífico suroriental y puede inspirar nuevas investigaciones en la región.

El ejemplar fue hallado en
El ejemplar fue hallado en el océano pacífico. (Unsplash)

El hallazgo de ejemplares en capturas accidentales, como el caso de 2007 durante una pesca de bacalao, demuestra que la biodiversidad marina aún oculta sorpresas. El trabajo meticuloso de los científicos permitió rescatar información valiosa de especímenes que, de otro modo, habrían permanecido en el anonimato.

La especie presenta rasgos morfológicos únicos, especialmente en la disposición de las verrugas de su piel.

Advertisement

Los investigadores destacan la importancia de los rasgos fenotípicos en la identificación del nuevo pulpo. Las verrugas que cubren la piel varían en número y disposición respecto a otras especies del género. Esta característica se suma a diferencias genéticas que confirman su condición de especie única. Las observaciones morfológicas resultaron determinantes para comprender el valor del hallazgo.

De acuerdo con el estudio de las verrugas y otros rasgos visibles, se pudo concluir que era un ser único en el ecosistema marino. La aparición de una nueva especie de pulpo en el oceáno confirma el potencial inexplorado de la región. El estudio de la especie sienta bases para investigar la evolución y adaptación en ambientes extremos.

La comunidad científica valora el aporte de este descubrimiento para la conservación y el manejo sustentable de los ecosistemas marinos. Los investigadores instan a fortalecer la exploración de aguas profundas y la protección de la biodiversidad en el Pacífico suroriental, una de las regiones más ricas y menos exploradas del planeta.

Advertisement



Pulpo Graneledone sellanesi,pulpo,vida marina,océano,bentónico,cefalópodo,especie marina,fondo marino,Graneledone,sellanesi

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

US positions F-22 stealth fighters in Israel, puts ‘almost any target in Iran at risk’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

As the Trump administration weighs its next move on Iran, one of the most advanced aircraft in the U.S. arsenal has taken up position closer to Tehran.

Advertisement

Eleven U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor stealth fighters have arrived at Israel’s Ovda Air Base in the country’s south, Fox News reported, marking the first-ever operational deployment of American combat aircraft to Israel. The move comes amid a broader U.S. military buildup in the region not seen at this scale in years and as concerns grow over Iran’s nuclear program and missile capabilities.

For American decision-makers, the significance is straightforward: The F-22 changes the military equation.

«The F-22 is indeed the most air-to-air capable fighter in the world; nothing comes close to it in the air-to-air role,» said retired Lt. Gen. Joseph Guastella, former deputy chief of staff for operations at U.S. Air Force headquarters. During a May 26 webinar hosted by the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA), he described its presence as «a very clear deterrent signal» that allows the United States to «negotiate with strength.»

Advertisement

An F-22 Raptor flies in this undated image provided by Lockheed Martin. (Lockheed Martin via Getty Images)

Designed to establish and maintain air superiority, the F-22 can operate in heavily defended airspace and suppress enemy air defenses. In any potential strike scenario against Iran, that capability would be critical. Before bombers or strike aircraft can reach hardened nuclear or missile targets, someone has to clear the skies. That is the F-22’s core mission, former generals explained in the webinar.

Guastella underscored what forward positioning means in practical terms. «The advantage of the large force that’s there is that it can hold almost any target in Iran at risk … if that’s what the president wants to do,» he said.

Advertisement

Retired Lt. Gen. Charles Moore, former deputy commander of U.S. Cyber Command, said in the webinar that the deployment is about expanding presidential options rather than signaling a predetermined strike.

TRUMP ISSUES STERN IRAN WARNING AS TEHRAN ANGRILY REACTS TO SPEECH AMID MUTED WORLD REACTION

Two U.S. F-22 Raptor fighters fly over European airspace during a flight to Britain from Mihail Kogalniceanu air base in Romania April 25, 2016. REUTERS/Toby Melville - RTX2BM2B

Two U.S. F-22 Raptor fighters fly over European airspace during a flight to Britain from Mihail Kogalniceanu air base in Romania April 25, 2016. (Reuters)

«There is a lot of combat capability that’s been moved into the region … the more capability, the more assets we put, the more options that the President has. We don’t box him in,» Moore said.

Advertisement

He added that the posture allows the United States «to be prepared for a long-term type of deployment and sustainment of combat capability if that’s what the President decides he wants us to do.»

Trump signaled Friday that diplomacy remains his preference but did not rule out force. Speaking to reporters as he departed the White House for a trip to Texas, he said he was not happy with Iran and wants to make a deal with Tehran, but warned that «sometimes you have to» use military force. He added that Iran remains unwilling to forswear nuclear weapons as demanded by the United States.

The choice of Israel as the deployment site also matters. Unlike some Gulf bases, where operational restrictions can apply, Israel offers fewer political constraints, they explained. That gives U.S. planners additional freedom of action in a fast-moving crisis.

Advertisement

THE ONLY MAP YOU NEED TO SEE TO UNDERSTAND HOW SERIOUS TRUMP IS ABOUT IRAN

F22 Raptor fighter

A U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor fighter jet climbs after taking off from the former Roosevelt Roads naval base in Puerto Rico, Jan. 4, 2026.  (Ricardo Arduengo/Reuters)

JINSA’s fellow for American Strategy, Jonathan Ruhe, said the move follows a JINSA recommendation to expand U.S. basing options in Israel, outlined in a report the organization published last fall.

That report argued that forward basing in Israel would enhance U.S. flexibility and deterrence in the region. The organization has for months pushed the idea that Israel could function as a land-based platform for American airpower in the Middle East.

Advertisement

Former Israeli Air Force commander Maj. Gen. (ret.) Amikam Norkin said deploying such high-end aircraft to the region is not routine and framed the move as both operational and strategic. «It presents the American commitment to Israeli security once you are landing with your best airplane in Israel,» he said, adding that regional actors «understand the very strong commitment of the American government, American military, American President, to the national security of Israel.»

At the same time, he rejected the idea that the deployment represents a shift toward American «boots on the ground» in Israel.

«Well, it’s not the first time that America is on the ground. As you remember the 12-Day War, the American Air Defense System supported us. So it’s already been done,» Norkin said.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Map of US assets in Middle East

Map shows where the U.S. is building up military forces near Iran. (Fox News )

More broadly, he emphasized that Iran is not solely an Israeli problem. «The Iranian threat, it’s not just an Israeli threat, it’s a regional threat, and the American forces support the region, not just Israel.»

Adm. Brad Cooper, head of U.S. Central Command briefed President Donald Trump at the White House on Thursday on potential military options targeting Iran, a source familiar with the meeting confirmed to Fox News. The president’s top military adviser, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dan Caine, also attended the briefing.

Advertisement

For now, officials describe the move as part of preparedness rather than a prelude to immediate conflict. But the arrival of America’s premier air-dominance fighter on Israeli soil signals a new phase in U.S.-Israel military coordination and a clear message to Tehran: If the president chooses to strike, the tools are already in place.

Related Article

Trump 'not happy' with Iran talks, hasn't made 'final decision' on US strikes



iran,military,national security,israel,wars,nuclear terror,donald trump

Continue Reading

Tendencias