Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Fierce Israel critic launches Senate bid in Michigan high-stakes 2026 midterm race

Published

on


A former Michigan public health official and Democratic candidate for governor entered the race for the state’s open U.S. Senate seat on Thursday in what could be one of the most watched races in the 2026 midterm elections.

Abdul El-Sayed, 40, is the second Democrat to put his name in the running to replace Democratic Sen. Gary Peters, who is not seeking reelection. 

Advertisement

El-Sayed, a prominent figure in a movement that was highly critical of support for Israel in the 2024 election cycle, aims to set himself apart from the other Democratic candidates in the race to replace Peters, state Sen. Mallory McMorrow. 

McMorrow has said she would vote against Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., retaining his leadership position should she prevail in the primary and general election to represent the battleground state in the upper chamber of Congress. 

However, El-Sayed held back criticism of Schumer.

Advertisement

«Anybody who tells you that they’re going to unilaterally oppose one potential candidate without knowing who the alternative is, is either unnuanced or unsophisticated,» El-Sayed told Politico. «So I want to know who is available, who is actively seeking the leadership. I’ll make a decision from there.»

GRETCHEN WHITMER RIBBED ONLINE FOR SEEMING TO HIDE FACE IN OVAL OFFICE

Michigan Democratic then-gubernatorial candidate Abdul El-Sayed campaigns with support from New York Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez at a rally on the campus of Wayne State University on July 28, 2018, in Detroit. (Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)

Advertisement

«What we need right now is somebody who’s willing to take the fight directly to Trump and Musk, but then also knows how to rebuild a version of our federal government that better serves working people after the carnage that Musk and Trump are going to leave behind, and I think I offer that,» he told Politico. 

Other Democrats considering a run to replace Peters include U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens and Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel.

El-Sayed was active in the «uncommited movement,» a group of anti-Israel, traditionally Democratic voters in Michigan, a critical swing state, who threatened to withhold support from then-President Joe Biden, and then then-Vice President Kamala Harris, over the administration’s stance on Gaza. He did say he would back whoever was the eventual Democratic choice for the presidential ticket to oppose now-President Donald Trump, according to Politico.

Advertisement

The Israel-Hamas war exposed deep divisions within the Democratic Party last election cycle, and there is concern the conflict could again make for a messy Senate Democratic primary in Michigan if the American Israel Public Affairs Committee intervenes. The powerful pro-Israel lobby group financially backed Stevens in 2022, when redistricting forced a competitive primary run against fellow Democrat, Rep. Andy Levin.

«Everybody is unified around leadership that reminds the Democratic Party that we ought to be the party of peace and justice, that we ought not to be the party sending bombs and money to foreign militaries to drop bombs on other people’s kids in their schools and their hospitals, when our kids need more, our hospitals and schools need more, and we should be spending that money here at home,» El-Sayed  told Politico. 

Dr. Abdul El-Sayed participates in 2020 pandemic roundtable in Michigan

Abdul El-Sayed speaks during a coronavirus public health roundtable with presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday, March 9, 2020. (Erin Kirkland/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

FIRST ON FOX: REPUBLICAN LAUNCHES SECOND STRAIGHT BID TO FLIP DEMOCRAT-HELD SENATE SEAT IN KEY BATTLEGROUND

Advertisement

El-Sayed ran for governor in 2018 as a progressive Democrat and was endorsed by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. 

He came in second in the Democratic primary, losing to Gretchen Whitmer by more than 20 points and beating now-U.S. Rep. Shri Thanedar by more than 12 points. Whitmer went on to win the general election and is in the midst of a second term. She cannot run again because of term limits.

A resident of Ann Arbor, El-Sayed recently served as director of the Department of Health, Human and Veterans Services in Wayne County, home to Detroit. Before that, he was the public health director of the city after it declared bankruptcy in 2013.

Advertisement

El-Sayed cautioned Democrats against learning the «wrong lessons» from their defeats. 

Bernie Sanders with Dr. Abdul El-Sayed at 2020 roundtable

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders participates in a coronavirus public health roundtable with healthcare professionals, including Abdul El-Sayed, left, as he campaigns on March 9, 2020, in Detroit. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

«If you cut corners and trim your message, and you triangulate to the least common denominator, you can find something that’s perfectly inoffensive to everyone, and the problem with that is that you’re not actually saying anything,» he told Politico. 

El-Sayed said he met with the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee on Tuesday. He told Politico that it was his «understanding» that the Senate Democrats’ campaign arm would not get involved in the primary. If that happens, that deviates from how the DSCC previously acted to clear the field of potential primary candidates to make for an easier primary victory for then-Rep. Elissa Slotkin. Now-Sen. Slotkin, D-Mich., easily won the primary over Hill Harper, and then won the general election.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

El-Sayed is also the second candidate this week to launch a campaign to replace Peters. On the Republican side, former U.S. Rep. Mike Rogers launched his bid on Monday after losing the Senate race last year by 19,000 votes to Democrat Slotkin.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Michigan,Senate,Senate Democrats,Bernie Sanders,Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Georgia attorney general sues GOP opponent in governor’s race over campaign financing

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, one of the leading Republican contenders for governor, has filed a lawsuit against Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, challenging the legality of his GOP rival’s campaign funding.

Advertisement

Carr asked a federal judge to permanently block Jones’ ability to spend money from his leadership committee, a fundraising tool that allows the state’s governor, lieutenant governor and legislative leaders to raise unlimited funds. 

Both men are leading Republican candidates to succeed term-limited GOP Gov. Brian Kemp after next year’s election.

Carr argues that Jones’ leadership committee violates the attorney general’s First Amendment right to free speech and his 14th Amendment right to equal protection by setting up a campaign finance structure that boosts Jones and limits how much Carr can spend on his campaign. A 2021 state law that created leadership committees does not allow Carr or other declared candidates to have access to the fundraising vehicle. 

Advertisement

Carr’s regular campaign committee is limited to raising $8,400 from each donor for his primary campaign and $4,200 for a potential primary runoff.

FORMER GEORGIA LT. GOV. GEOFF DUNCAN ABANDONS GOP TO JOIN DEMOCRATIC PARTY

Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, pictured here, sued Lt. Gov. Burt Jones over the legality of the lieutenant governor’s campaign funding. (Megan Varner/Getty Images)

Advertisement

Carr campaign spokeswoman Julia Mazzone said in a statement that Jones «is using his position to sidestep contribution limits, raise six-figure checks during legislative sessions and funnel unlimited money into a competitive primary through a structure only he can access.»

«Republicans cannot ignore the cloud of unethical, illegal and corrupt behavior that surrounds Burt Jones,» Mazzone said.

«Leadership committees were never intended to be unregulated campaign machines,» the statement added. «The court has ruled on this before, and the Constitution prohibits exactly what’s happening here. We’re taking action to uphold transparency and accountability standards.»

Advertisement

A Jones campaign spokesperson, meanwhile, has accused Carr of being hypocritical since his office previously defended the same law that he is now challenging in court. Carr has argued that the attorney general must defend challenged laws even if he personally disagrees with them.

«Georgia’s lackluster Attorney General defended this law two years ago,» Kendyl Parker, Jones’ spokeswoman said. «Now, he’s running for governor and wants to challenge the same law he once defended. If hypocrisy were an Olympic sport, he’d take gold.»

Carr launched his gubernatorial bid last year, saying he needed more time to raise money because he is not personally wealthy. His campaign has expressed concerns for months that Jones will use his leadership committee and family wealth to support his primary campaign.

Advertisement

REPUBLICAN DOOLEY JUMPS INTO GEORGIA’S SENATE RACE WHILE TOUTING SUPPORT FOR TRUMP AND TAKING AIM AT OSSOFF

Attorney General Chris Carr at podium

Georgia AG Chris Carr asked a federal judge to permanently block Lt. Gov. Burt Jones’ ability to spend money from the lieutenant governor’s leadership committee. (Nathan Posner/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

The Carr campaign has sought to have the state Ethics Commission probe the source of a $10 million loan Jones made to his leadership committee, although the commission declined to launch an investigation, noting that Carr failed to allege a legal violation.

The attorney general’s campaign pointed to U.S. District Judge Mark Cohen’s 2022 ruling that a leadership committee for Kemp could not use money for Kemp’s re-election campaign during that year’s Republican primary. Cohen found that the «unequal campaign finance scheme» violated GOP primary challenger and former U.S. Sen. David Perdue’s First Amendment right to free speech.

Advertisement

Cohen ruled that Kemp could continue raising money for the leadership committee but said the governor could not spend it against Perdue in the primary.

«Despite full knowledge of this history, Mr. Jones and his leadership committee, WBJ Leadership Committee, Inc., are ignoring this Court’s prior rulings and using a leadership committee—that has no contribution or coordinated spending limits—in a primary election against a candidate without one,» Carr’s lawsuit reads.

Carr is seeking additional restrictions on Jones’ leadership committee than in Cohen’s ruling. The attorney general is asking a judge to cut off both fundraising and spending from the lieutenant governor’s leadership committee until the primary race is over.

Advertisement

He is also requesting that a federal magistrate judge be appointed to oversee all spending by the leadership committee and that Jones’ regular campaign committee repay any money already spent by the leadership committee to support Jones’ gubernatorial run.

«The loan and its amount are significant because Mr. Jones is also able to raise unlimited funds into the leadership committee, then repay the loan from funds raised that then can be applied directly to his campaign account, effectively removing the contribution limits from those dollars,» the lawsuit says.

Republican Georgia Lt. Gov. Burt Jones

Lt. Gov. Burt Jones’ campaign criticized Georgia AG Chris Carr as a hypocrite since his office defended the same law in 2022 that he is now challenging in court. (Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images)

Carr asks that the court block Jones from giving any cash to dark money groups or making any loans to his regular campaign committee during the primary. He also wants the magistrate judge to probe where Jones’ $10 million loan came from, citing a 2022 financial disclosure showing that Jones did not have enough liquid assets for a loan of that quantity.

Advertisement

The attorney general’s campaign continues to express concern that Jones could raise unlimited money to repay his loan and then give the repaid money to his candidate committee for the primary, arguing that this would wreck campaign contribution restrictions.

«Mr. Jones is raising and spending unlimited amounts of money in the primary—and Mr. Carr is limited in what he can raise by Georgia’s existing campaign contribution limits,» the lawsuit reads. «This Court should level this uneven playing field by preventing Mr. Jones from using his leadership committee during the primary election.»

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Carr’s campaign has also called on the Ethics Commission for an advisory legal opinion on whether Jones’ fundraising activity is legal.

The Republican primary will be held in May, and the general election next year in the purple state is expected to be one of the most expensive governor’s races in the country.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement

georgia,us,politics,republicans elections,elections,elections state and local

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump-Putin summit could happen as soon as next week

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Trump could be happening as soon as next week. 

Advertisement

Fox News can report that officials are tentatively planning for a Trump-Putin summit at the end of next week, according to a source familiar with the planning. The location is still up in the air but Hungary, Switzerland, Rome and the United Arab Emirates are in the mix, Fox News is told.

ZELENSKYY TELLS PUTIN TO ‘BE BRAVE’ AND FINALLY AGREE TO TRILATERAL MEETING WITH TRUMP

President Donald Trump is expected to meet in person with Russia’s Vladimir Putin, possibly next week.  (Getty Images)

Advertisement

TRUMP-PUTIN MEETING AGREED UPON ‘IN PRINCIPLE,’ KREMLIN AIDE INDICATES

The summit could still ultimately fall apart as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy informed officials of the terms of the Ukrainian Constitution which mandate a national referendum for any territorial concessions.

U.S. President Donald Trump (C) and Vice President JD Vance meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office at the White House on February 28, 2025 in Washington, DC. 

U.S. President Donald Trump (C) and Vice President JD Vance meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office at the White House on February 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.  (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

A meeting between Putin and Trump would be their first since Trump returned to office this year. It would be a significant milestone in the 3-year-old war, though there’s no promise such a meeting would lead to the end of the fighting since Russia and Ukraine remain far apart on their demands.

Advertisement

Trump, appearing before reporters later at the White House, didn’t answer questions about a potential location for a meeting but when asked about a summit with Putin and Zelenskyy, said «there’s a very good prospect that they will» meet.

vladimir putin

In this pool photograph distributed by the Russian state agency Sputnik, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin chairs a Security Council meeting via videoconference at the Kremlin in Moscow on March 28, 2025. (SERGEI ILYIN/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The president declined to predict how close he was to reaching a deal to end the fighting, saying, «I’ve been disappointed before with this one.»

Advertisement

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 



donald trump,vladimir putin,russia,ukraine,world

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Para Putin, la cumbre con Trump es clave para asegurar los objetivos de Ucrania

Published

on


BERLÍN — El presidente de Rusia, Vladimir Putin, ha dicho durante mucho tiempo que quiere sentarse con el presidente Donald Trump.

cree que una reunión de este tipo, y no sólo un avance en el campo de batalla, es su mejor oportunidad para asegurar una victoria en su guerra contra Ucrania.

Advertisement

Los analistas que estudian a Putin, así como la gente que lo conoce, han dicho desde los primeros días de la guerra que el objetivo principal del líder ruso es principalmente asegurar un acuerdo de paz que logre sus objetivos geopolíticos, y no necesariamente conquistar una cierta cantidad de territorio en el campo de batalla.

Y es el presidente estadounidense, dicen, quien está mejor posicionado para cumplir esos objetivos, que incluyen mantener a Ucrania fuera de la OTAN e impedir la futura expansión de la alianza.

Esto ayuda a explicar por qué Putin se ha mostrado tan centrado en apaciguar a Trump y evitar una ruptura con Washington, incluso cuando Trump ha mostrado una creciente impaciencia ante la negativa de Putin a aceptar un alto el fuego.

Advertisement
Personas protestan contra la redistribución de distritos electorales frente a la Mansión del Gobernador de Texas en Austin, Texas, el 4 de agosto de 2025. El presidente Donald Trump intensifica su campaña de presión sobre los estados de mayoría republicana para que rediseñen los mapas del Congreso a su favor, con el objetivo de mejorar las posibilidades de su partido de mantener el control del Congreso en las elecciones intermedias del próximo año. (Ilana Panich-Linsman/The New York Times)

“Putin quiere mantener a Trump como recurso para una posible transición hacia la paz”, dijo Sergei Markov, analista político pro-Kremlin en Moscú.

“Trump es necesario para lograr las condiciones de Rusia”.

Es probable que esa sea la razón por la que Putin lleva meses diciendo que quiere celebrar una cumbre.

Advertisement

“Probablemente sea mejor para nosotros reunirnos”, dijo Putin sobre Trump en enero, “y, en base a las realidades actuales, hablar con calma sobre todas las áreas que son de interés tanto para Estados Unidos como para Rusia”.

Un día después de que el enviado especial de Trump, Steve Witkoff, se reuniera con Putin en Moscú, el Kremlin confirmó el jueves por la mañana que Putin y Trump planeaban reunirse en los próximos días, pero no fijó una fecha exacta para la cumbre.

Funcionarios rusos y estadounidenses afirmaron que podría tener lugar la próxima semana.

Advertisement

Trump había comunicado a los líderes europeos su intención de reunirse con Putin y, poco después, reunirse con Putin y el presidente ucraniano, Volodímir Zelensky.

Sin embargo, un asesor del Kremlin declaró el jueves que Moscú no había acordado una reunión tripartita.

«Esa opción simplemente fue mencionada por el representante estadounidense durante la conversación en el Kremlin», declaró a la prensa Yuri Ushakov, asesor de política exterior de Putin.

Advertisement

Añadió que Moscú no había hecho comentarios sobre la idea de una cumbre tripartita y que no se había discutido concretamente con Witkoff.

Horas después, Putin dijo que no se oponía a reunirse con Zelensky —una posibilidad que el líder de Ucrania ha solicitado repetidamente— pero reiteró que deben cumplirse “ciertas condiciones” antes de que tal reunión pueda tener lugar.

“Lamentablemente, en estos momentos estamos muy lejos de esas condiciones”, afirmó Putin.

Advertisement
Bomberos en un hospital para tuberculosos tras el impacto de una bomba rusa en el techo en Járkov, Ucrania, el viernes 25 de julio de 2025. El presidente ruso, Vladímir Putin, lleva tiempo afirmando su deseo de reunirse con el presidente Trump. La razón: cree que dicha reunión, más que un simple avance en el campo de batalla, es su mejor oportunidad para asegurar la victoria en su guerra contra Ucrania. (David Guttenfelder/The New York Times)Bomberos en un hospital para tuberculosos tras el impacto de una bomba rusa en el techo en Járkov, Ucrania, el viernes 25 de julio de 2025. El presidente ruso, Vladímir Putin, lleva tiempo afirmando su deseo de reunirse con el presidente Trump. La razón: cree que dicha reunión, más que un simple avance en el campo de batalla, es su mejor oportunidad para asegurar la victoria en su guerra contra Ucrania. (David Guttenfelder/The New York Times)

Trump, presionado por un periodista en la Oficina Oval sobre si Putin tuvo que reunirse con Zelensky en una reunión trilateral con Trump para que Trump se reuniera con Putin, Trump dijo:

«No, no lo necesita», según un informe del grupo.

Zelensky, en una declaración en la plataforma social X, dijo que se habían propuesto varios formatos de reunión.

“Ucrania no teme a las reuniones y espera la misma valentía del lado ruso”, dijo.

Advertisement

“Es hora de que pongamos fin a la guerra. Gracias a todos los que están ayudando”.

Giro

Desde que inició un acercamiento con el Kremlin en enero, la administración Trump había estado resistiéndose a aceptar una cumbre con Putin, esperando una señal del Kremlin de que el líder ruso realmente hablaba en serio sobre un verdadero cese del fuego en el campo de batalla.

Advertisement

El repentino compromiso de la Casa Blanca de celebrar una cumbre ha suscitado preguntas sobre qué acordó Putin, si acaso acordó algo, el miércoles durante sus conversaciones en Moscú con Witkoff.

No está claro qué discutieron exactamente los dos hombres.

Ushakov declaró a la prensa el miércoles que Putin había transmitido ciertas «señales» a Witkoff sobre Ucrania, pero el asesor del Kremlin no entró en detalles.

Advertisement

Una posibilidad es que Putin haya mostrado mayor flexibilidad en la cuestión de cómo se podría dividir o intercambiar la tierra en cualquier acuerdo entre Rusia y Ucrania.

Durante meses, los enviados rusos han insistido en conversaciones con sus homólogos estadounidenses en que Moscú reciba la totalidad de las cuatro regiones que el Kremlin afirmó haber «anexado» de Ucrania a finales de 2022, a pesar de que amplias extensiones del territorio permanecían bajo control ucraniano.

Los negociadores estadounidenses consideraron esta postura irrazonable y la interpretaron como una señal de que Moscú no se tomaba en serio negociar el fin de la guerra.

Advertisement

Algunos analistas sugirieron que Putin había pedido a sus enviados durante las conversaciones de este año que se mantuvieran únicamente en la línea más dura para forzar una reunión con Trump.

Los funcionarios rusos podrían estar esperando que una cumbre individual le dé a Putin la oportunidad de convencer a Trump, quien desde hace tiempo simpatiza con Rusia, para que vuelva a apoyar las opiniones del líder ruso sobre lo que él llama «las causas profundas del conflicto».

Personas cercanas al Kremlin, así como analistas políticos, dicen que las demandas de Putin —excluir a Ucrania de la OTAN, limitar las capacidades militares ucranianas y sentar las bases para un gobierno más amigable con Moscú en Ucrania— son más cruciales para él que los detalles de qué territorio controla Rusia en última instancia.

Advertisement

“Lo más importante para Putin es la OTAN y estas garantías férreas de que Ucrania no estará en la OTAN y de que los países de la OTAN no desarrollarán una presencia militar en Ucrania, además de una serie de exigencias políticas para la propia Ucrania”, declaró Tatiana Stanovaya, investigadora principal del Centro Carnegie de Eurasia de Moscú.

Otras exigencias, añadió, podrían ser negociables.

Moscú no ha demarcado formalmente las fronteras de las cuatro regiones «anexadas», lo que, según Stanovaya, sugiere que siempre ha habido cierta flexibilidad en la cuestión territorial.

Advertisement

No descartó la posibilidad de que Rusia esté dispuesta a intercambiar ciertos territorios.

Algunos analistas creen que lo más probable es que se ofrezcan a cambio en negociaciones territorios controlados por Rusia en regiones de Ucrania que Moscú no ha «anexado».

Rusia posee 1.719 kilómetros cuadrados (unas 660 millas cuadradas) de territorio ucraniano en las regiones de Járkov y Sumy, ninguna de las cuales ha sido «anexada» por Rusia, según DeepState, un grupo ucraniano que mapea el conflicto utilizando imágenes de combate.

Advertisement

Pero Putin «no tiene un plan predefinido», dijo Stanovaya.

«Vive el presente. Sabe lo que quiere conseguir al final».

En este caso, dijo, lo que el líder ruso quiere es que Ucrania deje de ser lo que él ve como un “proyecto antirruso” y regrese a la esfera de influencia de Moscú.

Advertisement

“Entonces, o lo logra mediante las garantías de la OTAN, es decir, las garantías de Occidente, o mediante el control político dentro de Ucrania”, dijo Stanovaya.

“Una u otra, o ambas. Luego, veremos cómo evoluciona. El territorio es muy secundario”.

Riesgos

Advertisement

Hay pocos indicios de que, a pesar de las crecientes amenazas de la Casa Blanca, Putin haya abandonado sus objetivos de línea dura.

Las fuerzas rusas tienen ventaja en el campo de batalla, por lo que la decisión de Putin de colonizar Ucrania en lugar de intentar conquistarla debería ser vista como una concesión en sí misma, dijo Feodor Voitolovsky, director del Instituto de Economía Mundial y Relaciones Internacionales, un grupo de investigación financiado por el gobierno ruso.

“Podríamos luchar un poco más, esperar unos meses más y lograr resultados aún mayores y más serios en el campo de batalla”, dijo Voitolovsky, quien forma parte de los consejos asesores del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y del Consejo de Seguridad de Rusia.

Advertisement

Pero aunque las fuerzas rusas han estado avanzando en Ucrania desde que lanzaron una ofensiva de verano, han sufrido pérdidas significativas y están lejos de apoderarse de la totalidad de las cuatro regiones “anexadas”.

Stanovaya afirmó que Putin preferiría la capitulación de Zelensky, bajo presión de Trump, para que las fuerzas rusas pudieran cesar los combates.

Pero la lógica del líder ruso, afirmó, es «conseguiremos lo que queremos a cualquier precio», sin importar las consecuencias económicas o sociales.

Advertisement

«Están dispuestos a luchar durante años si es necesario», añadió.

«Claro que preferirían no hacerlo».

c.2025 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias