Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Fox News Poll: Voters view legal immigration as helpful, favor deporting those who are here illegally

Published

on



NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Two weeks after federal raids in Los Angeles spurred nationwide protests on immigration policy, the latest Fox News national survey finds many voters think legal immigrants help the country – while also favoring deporting those who are here illegally.

Advertisement

Seventy percent think legal immigrants help the U.S. rather than hurt it (22%). That’s up 15 points from two years ago when 55% said they help.

The increase is mostly driven by a sharp increase in the number of Republicans who think legal immigrants help the country (61% vs. 35% in 2023).

FOX NEWS POLL: VOTERS THINK IRAN POSES A REAL THREAT TO US SECURITY, BUT SPLIT ON ISRAEL’S STRIKES

Advertisement

At the same time, a 56% majority favors deporting those who are in the U.S. illegally. That’s down from 63% since March and a high of 67% in October 2024 and December 2023.

Most Republicans (87%) and more than half of Independents (54%) favor deporting those here illegally, while two-thirds of Democrats oppose it (67%).

More Hispanic voters believe legal immigrants help (68%) than hurt (24%), but they are split on deporting illegal immigrants (49% favor, 48% oppose).

Advertisement

On June 6, federal agents carried out immigration enforcement raids in Los Angeles that prompted nationwide protests aimed at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency, or ICE, and President Donald Trump’s immigration policies. In response, Trump mobilized the National Guard and U.S. military to assist federal agents and local law enforcement – to which state and local officials, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom, objected.

Nearly half of voters (46%) approve of the job ICE is doing, and disapproval has increased from 41% in 2018 to 49% in 2019 to 52% today. Attitudes toward ICE are driven by partisanship, as more than 8 in 10 Democrats disapprove, while an equal number of Republicans approve. Almost two-thirds of Independents disapprove.

«Trump is on sure footing when he tries to remove people who are in the country illegally,» says Republican pollster Daron Shaw, who conducts the Fox News Poll with Democratic counterpart Chris Anderson. «But Democrats and some independents are susceptible to the claim that the ICE raids are heavy-handed and cast the net too broadly.»

Advertisement

By a 6-point margin, more voters favor local governments cooperating with ICE in enforcing federal immigration policies than support allowing them to have full control over immigration enforcement in their communities (51% vs. 45%).

Divisions are stark as men, White voters, voters ages 65 and over, and Republicans prefer local governments cooperating with immigration enforcement, while nonwhite voters, voters under age 30, and Democrats favor local leaders having full control. Views among women are split.

When it comes to protesting ICE and federal immigration enforcement, voters split: 49% say it is appropriate, and the same number say inappropriate.

Advertisement

FOX NEWS POLL: ECONOMIC PESSIMISM ABATES SLIGHTLY AS VOTERS REFLECT ON THE ECONOMY

On Trump’s response to the protests, by a 5-point margin, more say sending in the National Guard and U.S. military was inappropriate (52%) versus appropriate (47%).

Those most likely to say the protests are appropriate while also saying that sending the armed forces is inappropriate are Democratic men, Hispanic voters, women with a college degree, and voters under 30. Those most likely to disapprove of the protests while also supporting military involvement are Republican women, conservatives, White evangelical Christians, and Whites without a college degree. Independents think both actions are inappropriate.

Advertisement

Overall, more than half (52%) say sending the National Guard made things worse compared to one-third thinking it made things better (34%).

A slim majority of voters say the Trump administration’s enforcement of immigration policies have gone too far (53%). That’s more than twice as many who think they haven’t gone far enough (21%). One quarter feel they are about right (26%). Even so, voters are split on whether these policies make the U.S. safer (39% safe, 39% less safe, 22% make no difference).

In general, about two-thirds are concerned about illegal immigration (67% extremely or very), domestic use of U.S. military troops (66%), and protests in U.S. cities (63%), but these issues draw the least concern of eight issues tested in the poll.

Advertisement

The future of the U.S. (85% extremely or very concerned), inflation (84%), government spending (80%), Iran getting a nuclear bomb (78%), and antisemitism (69%) are more worrisome to voters.

More Democrats (87%) and Independents (71%) express concern about the deployment of federal troops in cities in response to anti-ICE protests than Republicans (42%). Conversely, more Republicans (84%) worry about illegal immigration than Independents (68%) and Democrats (49%).

Trump’s best job rating is on border security as 53% approve (46% disapprove). Immigration is his next highest, but he’s still underwater here (46% approve, 53% disapprove).

Advertisement

It helps that Democrats give him double-digit approval on both (19% approve on border security, 11% immigration).

Overall, 46% approve of Trump’s job performance, while 54% disapprove.

Trump’s personal favorable rating stands at 45% favorable, 55% unfavorable – similar to last month. Newsom’s favorable rating sits lower than the president’s, at 39% favorable (45% unfavorable) – still, that’s a 4-point improvement from last July. Some 16% are unable to rate Newsom.

Advertisement

One more thing…

Earlier this month, Trump signed an executive order barring citizens from 12 African and Middle Eastern countries from traveling to the U.S.

Voters split on the action, with 48% approving it, while the same number disapproves.

Eight years ago, when Trump ordered a similar ban, voters were more decisive. At that time, 43% approved and 54% disapproved of banning citizens from six countries in the same regions.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE FOR CROSSTABS AND TOPLINE

Conducted June 13-16, 2025, under the direction of Beacon Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R), this Fox News survey includes interviews with a sample of 1,003 registered voters randomly selected from a national voter file. Respondents spoke with live interviewers on landlines (149) and cellphones (566) or completed the survey online after receiving a text (288). Results based on the full sample have a margin of sampling error of ±3 percentage points. Sampling error for results among subgroups is higher. In addition to sampling error, question wording and order can influence results. Weights are generally applied to age, race, education, and area variables to ensure the demographics are representative of the registered voter population. Sources for developing weight targets include the American Community Survey, Fox News Voter Analysis, and voter file data.

Advertisement
Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Estas son las cinco condiciones aprobadas por Israel para poner fin a la guerra en Gaza

Published

on


Estos son los cinco principios que Israel fijó como condición para poner fin a la guerra en la Franja de Gaza (REUTERS)

Israel dio un nuevo paso en su estrategia militar y política en la Franja de Gaza al definir los términos que, según su gobierno, permitirían poner fin al actual conflicto con el grupo terrorista Hamas. En una sesión clave celebrada este viernes, el Gabinete de Seguridad aprobó una serie de principios que establecen las condiciones mínimas para un eventual alto el fuego, así como un nuevo plan de acción militar centrado en la ocupación de la Ciudad de Gaza, uno de los últimos bastiones del grupo islamista.

Las decisiones se producen en un momento en que el conflicto ha alcanzado un punto crítico tanto en el frente militar como en el terreno diplomático. Las autoridades israelíes sostienen que la derrota total de Hamas y la recuperación de los rehenes son objetivos innegociables. A la vez, se intensifican los debates internos sobre la viabilidad y el impacto humanitario de una ocupación más amplia del enclave palestino.

Advertisement
El Gabinete de Seguridad aprobó
El Gabinete de Seguridad aprobó una serie de principios que establecen las condiciones mínimas para un eventual alto el fuego (REUTERS/Amir Cohen)

Los principios, informados por la Oficina del Primer Ministro, son:

  1. El desarme de Hamas.
  2. El regreso de todos los rehenes, vivos y muertos.
  3. La desmilitarización de Gaza.
  4. Control de seguridad israelí en Gaza.
  5. El establecimiento de una administración civil que no sea ni Hamas ni la Autoridad Palestina.

Según el comunicado oficial, “una mayoría decisiva de ministros del Gabinete de Seguridad creía que el plan alternativo que se había presentado al Gabinete de Seguridad no lograría la derrota de Hamas ni el regreso de los rehenes”.

Horas antes de la aprobación de la misión, el primer ministro Benjamin Netanyahu declaró que Israel no quiere gobernar Gaza. “Queremos entregársela a fuerzas árabes que la gobiernen adecuadamente sin amenazarnos y garantizando una vida digna para los gazatíes; eso no es posible con Hamas”, afirmó.

En la misma sesión, el gabinete también aprobó un plan militar presentado por Netanyahu para que las Fuerzas de Defensa de Israel (FDI) ocupen la Ciudad de Gaza, situada en el norte del enclave palestino. La decisión fue comunicada oficialmente por la Oficina del Primer Ministro y confirmada por medios locales.

Antes de la reunión del
Antes de la reunión del Gabinete de Seguridad, el primer ministro Benjamin Netanyahu declaró que Israel no quiere gobernar Gaza (REUTERS)

Según el comunicado, las FDI se prepararán para avanzar sobre la ciudad y se comprometerán a garantizar la provisión de ayuda humanitaria a la población civil ubicada fuera de las zonas de combate. La oficina del primer ministro señaló que el gabinete respaldó la “propuesta de Netanyahu para derrotar a Hamas” y que Israel “proporcionará ayuda humanitaria a la población civil fuera de las zonas de combate”.

Indicó, además, que de los 50 rehenes que Israel contabiliza como aún cautivos de Hamas, se cree que 20 continúan con vida. El regreso de estas personas, junto con la eliminación de la capacidad militar del grupo, forman parte central de los principios aprobados.

Advertisement

Medios israelíes señalaron que el plan alternativo rechazado sería el impulsado por el jefe del Estado Mayor de las FDI, Eyal Zamir, quien expresó su oposición a la ocupación total de la franja, argumentando que podría derivar en un desastre humanitario y poner en riesgo la vida de los cautivos.

El comunicado del gobierno se refiere únicamente a la Ciudad de Gaza y no menciona la ocupación de toda la Franja, aunque el jueves Netanyahu había declarado que su objetivo era tomar el control total del enclave. La ciudad representa aproximadamente el 25% del territorio que las FDI todavía no controlan, junto con varios campos de refugiados en el centro de Gaza.

Medios israelíes señalaron que el
Medios israelíes señalaron que el plan alternativo rechazado sería el impulsado por el jefe del Estado Mayor de las FDI, Eyal Zamir, quien expresó su oposición a la ocupación total de la franja, argumentando que podría derivar en un desastre humanitario y poner en riesgo la vida de los cautivos (REUTERS)

No está claro si las otras áreas no conquistadas serán incluidas en etapas posteriores del plan aprobado. El énfasis en la Ciudad de Gaza indica que la toma de control militar se iniciará de manera gradual.

La ciudad, donde viven cerca de 800.000 residentes, es uno de los últimos bastiones bajo control de Hamas y concentra una alta densidad de población civil. Su eventual ocupación reduciría aún más el territorio habitable para los 2 millones de habitantes de Gaza y anticipa complejidades operativas y humanitarias en las próximas semanas.

Advertisement

(Con información de EFE)



Middle East,Military Conflicts,ISRAEL-GAZA BORDER

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

President Trump increases federal law enforcement presence in DC following violent crime surge

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump has directed federal law enforcement to increase its presence throughout Washington, D.C., following a concerning surge in violent crime, including an incident in which a former DOGE worker nicknamed «Big Balls» was brutally beaten in the streets this week.

Advertisement

Trump signed an executive order in March establishing the «Making DC Safe and Beautiful Task Force.» Now the administration is taking a whole-of-government approach by deploying additional law enforcement to increase presence and improve overall public safety in the nation’s capital city, according to a source familiar with the plans.

The operation, which will use both local and federal law enforcement agencies, including Homeland Security Investigations, the FBI, DEA and others, begins at midnight on Thursday and will initially last for seven days with the option to extend «as needed.»

Law enforcement will focus on improving safety in high-traffic tourist areas and other known hotspots.

Advertisement

TRUMP WHITE HOUSE CELEBRATES LATEST CHAPTER OF WINS AT 200-DAY MARK

Following a former DOGE worker nicknamed «Big Balls» being brutally beaten by gang members in the streets of Washington, D.C., President Donald Trump indicated he is strongly considering taking control of the district to stamp out the rampant crime and violence plaguing the nation’s capital city. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images and AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

In a statement to Fox News, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announced «there will be no safe harbor for violent criminals in D.C.» beginning on Thursday night.

Advertisement

«Washington, DC is an amazing city, but it has been plagued by violent crime for far too long,» Leavitt said. «President Trump has directed an increased presence of federal law enforcement to protect innocent citizens. Starting tonight, there will be no safe harbor for violent criminals in D.C.»

She added, «President Trump is committed to making our Nation’s capital safer for its residents, lawmakers, and visitors from all around the world.»

The source familiar with the plans noted that stamping out the «out-of-control violent crime plaguing DC» has been an «ongoing priority» for the president and that the move is him delivering on his campaign promise to restore the capital city.

Advertisement

TRUMP THREATENS TO FEDERALIZE DC AFTER EX-DOGE EMPLOYEE ‘BIG BALLS’ VIOLENTLY BEATEN

The White House

A view of the White House at night in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 23, 2022.  (Roy Rochlin/Getty Images)

Among the priorities laid out in Trump’s executive order, he directed the task force to deploy a more robust federal law enforcement presence and coordinate with local law enforcement in the District of Columbia, including the National Mall and Memorial Parks, museums, monuments, Lafayette Park, Union Station, Rock Creek Park, Anacostia Park, the George Washington Memorial Parkway, the Suitland Parkway, and the Baltimore-Washington Parkway.

The order also instructs the task force to review and, if needed, revise federal prosecutorial policies on pretrial detention of criminal defendants to ensure individuals who pose a threat to public safety are detained to the maximum extent permitted by law.

Advertisement

Additionally, the order instructs the task force to direct maximum enforcement of federal immigration law, redirecting federal, state or local law enforcement resources to apprehend and deport illegals throughout the area.

WATCH: TRUMP HINTS HE WILL FEDERALIZE DC SOON, BRING IN NATIONAL GUARD AFTER ‘BIG BALLS’ ATTACK

Donald Trump with his fist up

President Donald Trump gestures to the crowd at the Conservative Political Action Conference, CPAC, at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center, Saturday, Feb. 22, 2025, in Oxon Hill, Md.  (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

The source said the additional law enforcement will be devoted to protecting D.C. residents and visitors from the «scourge of violent crime plaguing» the city.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«President Trump promised to Make DC Safe Again on the campaign trail – this is another promise kept,» they said.

Advertisement

donald trump,executive policy,washington dc,crime world,police and law enforcement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Zoo’s request for donations of pets to be fed to predatory animals draws PETA blowback

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A zoo in Europe is inviting the public to turn unwanted pets into prey, calling for donations of fluffy rabbits and family guinea pigs to be euthanized and fed to its predator residents.

Advertisement

The Aalborg Zoo in Denmark announced the program in a Facebook post, sparking public uproar, including the ire of the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).

«If you have an animal that, for various reasons, needs to be rehomed, you are welcome to donate it to us. The animals are humanely euthanized by trained staff and then used as feed,» the zoo wrote in the social media post. «In this way, nothing goes to waste — and we ensure natural behavior, proper nutrition, and well-being for our predators.»

The zoo said private individuals and businesses can donate chickens, rabbits and guinea pigs, which organizers said make up an important part of predators’ diets.

Advertisement

The zoo is accepting small animals such as guinea pigs and larger animals for prey donations. (iStock)

PETA CALLS MAINE LOBSTER FESTIVAL ‘EGREGIOUSLY CRUEL’ IN NEW LAWSUIT AGAINST CITY

Specifically, the zoo said the Eurasian lynx requires «whole» prey animals that resemble what it would naturally hunt in the wild.

Advertisement

«In zoos, we have a responsibility to replicate the animals’ natural food chain — for the sake of both animal welfare and professional integrity,» employees wrote in the post.

The zoo is also accepting horses, noting owners «can join us all the way if you wish.»

Close-up of concealed Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) looking for prey from behind tree trunk in forest.

A Eurasian lynx stalks prey in a forest. (Philippe Clement/Arterra/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

HUNDREDS OF ANIMALS FLEE CARTEL CHAOS, VIOLENCE AFTER WILDLIFE REFUGE FACED WITH THREATS

Advertisement

PETA weighed in on the controversial initiative, saying there is nothing «natural» about the donation request.

«It’s not ‘natural behaviour’ for predators from Asia, who roam and hunt for their meals, to be fed companion animals who originated in South America,» PETA wrote in an online news release. «Companion animals are never needed to ‘imitate the natural food chain of the [zoo’s] animals’ (as an Aalborg Zoo spokesperson described the program).»

horses grazing

Horses can also be donated for prey, according to the zoo. (Melina Mara/The Washington Post)

BEARS ESCAPE WILDLIFE PARK ENCLOSURE AND FEAST ON WEEK’S WORTH OF HONEY

Advertisement

PETA added if the Aalborg Zoo «truly cares about animals,» it should focus on protecting species in their natural habitats.

The zoo later turned off the comments on its Facebook post detailing the program, citing «significant international interest.»

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«We understand that the post evokes emotions and interest, but hateful and malicious rhetoric is unnecessary — and we encourage keeping a respectful tone,» leadership wrote. «We’re happy to elaborate and answer questions via private messages or email.»

The Aalborg Zoo and PETA did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

Advertisement



europe,world,pets,lifestyle

Advertisement
Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias