INTERNACIONAL
«Hay que entenderlo»: un juez causó indignación al absolver a un hombre que le dio una brutal golpiza a su esposa
Un fallo judicial en Italia desató una ola de indignación y repudio. El juez Paolo Gallo, del tribunal de Turín, absolvió a un hombre acusado de atacar a su exesposa, Lucia Regna, a pesar de que le dio una paliza y le destrozó el rostro. El magistrado sostuvo que “hay que entender” al agresor “ y que su reacción fue “un desahogo humano” por la separación.
El episodio ocurrió el 28 de julio de 2022. Durante siete minutos, el hombre golpeó a Lucia Regna, de 44 años, hasta dejarla con el rostro desfigurado, 21 placas de titanio en la cara y un nervio ocular dañado de forma permanente.
Leé también: El caso Thomas Sanders que estremeció a Luisiana: el hombre que fingió su muerte y cayó por un doble crimen
“Me tomó por el pelo, me dio una trompada, y me golpeó la cabeza contra la pared mientras me decía que debía morir y gritaba´te mato’”, recordó la mujer en una entrevista con Mediaset.
Sin embargo, el juez consideró que no hubo “maltrato”, sino solo “lesiones personales”, y lo condenó a un año y medio de prisión, con atenuantes y en libertad condicional.
El fallo que minimizó la violencia y culpó a la víctima
En los fundamentos de la sentencia, el juez Gallo argumentó que el ataque no fue “un exceso de ira inmotivado”, sino “un desahogo comprensible dentro de la lógica de las relaciones humanas”. Según el magistrado, la víctima “destruyó un matrimonio de veinte años” al comunicar la separación “de manera brutal”.
El fallo también relativizó los insultos y amenazas que el hombre le gritó a Lucia Regna delante de sus hijos, como “no valés un c…”, o “te voy a matar”. Para el juez, esas frases deben “entenderse en el contexto de la disolución de la familia” y resultan “humanamente comprensibles”. Lucía Regna sufrió graves heridas. (Foto: gentileza La Stampa).
En varios pasajes, el magistrado insistió en que el agresor había sufrido una injusticia. Incluso lo describió como “sincero y persuasivo”. Así, el hombre quedó en libertad, mientras que la fiscal Barbara Badellino había pedido una condena de cuatro años y medio de cárcel por la brutal agresión machista.
Qué dijo la víctima sobre la sentencia
“La sentencia es otra bofetada”, dijo la víctima a Mediaset. “Haber justificado con esta sentencia que mi exmarido me haya masacrado creó un precedente para todos aquellos que hagan algo así”, agregó.
“Prácticamente, más que víctima me hizo sentir culpable”dijo.
“Lloré cuando la leí, volvemos a los crímenes de honor”, comentó Regna a La Stampa.
Repudio social y reclamo de justicia
La decisión judicial generó una reacción inmediata. La abogada de la víctima, Annalisa Baratto, denunció: “La sentencia disecciona y mortifica a la víctima, mientras es indulgente con el hombre que le destrozó la cara”.
Leé también: Máxima tensión: un influencer transmitió el terremoto de 6,9 grados que sacudió a Filipinas
Los dos hijos de Lucia Regna, también víctimas del caso, lanzaron una campaña contra la violencia de género. El 25 de noviembre pasado, pegaron en su escuela la foto del rostro golpeado de su madre con la frase: “Mujeres, denuncien de inmediato”.
Por su parte, el abogado defensor Giulio Pellegrino defendió el fallo y lo calificó como “un caso ejemplar de atención y rigor en el análisis de los hechos y las pruebas”.
El Congreso italiano pide explicaciones y advierte sobre el mensaje social
La presidenta de la Comisión parlamentaria de investigación sobre femicidios, Martina Semenzato, pidió los expedientes del caso y cuestionó duramente la sentencia: “En algunos tribunales, el delito de maltrato familiar solo se reconoce ante violencia física habitual, sin considerar que la Corte de Casación equipara la violencia psicológica y económica”.
Semenzato advirtió: “Ninguna ‘comprensión humana’ ni la ‘ amargura por la la disolución de la comunidad doméstica’ puede justificar las humillaciones a la pareja. Una sentencia puede ser correcta en derecho, pero social, cultural y humanamente inaceptable. El derecho no puede reducirse a puro tecnicismo, sobre todo en casos que pueden sentar precedentes”.
La diputada anunció que llevará el caso al Congreso y pedirá la comparecencia del juez que firmó el fallo.
Mientras, la Fiscalía de Turín apeló la sentencia de primera instancia. “Hemos apelado la sentencia y luego un juez decidirá”, explicó Cesare Parodi, presidente de la Asociación Nacional de Magistrados y fiscal adjunto de Turín.
Italia, Violencia machista
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The Democrats are taking a big gamble by going along with a government shutdown, one that they will probably lose.
The most important reason is that President Trump has a giant megaphone. Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer simply can’t compete in drawing media attention.
What’s more, while some Americans may blame both sides – can’t they act like adults and work out these budget fights? – the Republicans are blaming the «Democrat Party» for triggering the shutdown.
At yesterday’s White House briefing, itself a key advantage, JD Vance and Karoline Leavitt kept repeating, like a mantra, that the Democrats support «healthcare for illegal aliens.» That is bunk. They aren’t eligible. It’s already against the law, except in emergency situations. But Trump is pounding that message home through sheer repetition.
VANCE BLAMES SCHUMER’S FEAR OF AOC PRIMARY CHALLENGE AS SHUTDOWN CAUSE
Democratic leadership sits at a sizable disadvantage when it comes to government shutdown-related messaging. (J. Scott Applewhite, file/AP Photo)
A Washington Post editorial yesterday says «Democrats just marched into a shutdown trap … Progressives embraced the same disastrous mentality that led the House Freedom Caucus to believe it could come out ahead in previous government funding standoffs: They wrongly assumed their political leverage would withstand the ensuing fallout.»
A few minutes after the briefing, Hakeem Jeffries stepped before the microphones to declare that Republicans don’t want to provide healthcare «to working-class Americans.»
The minority leader said the administration is trying to «jam their extreme right-wing agenda down the throats of the American people … The Republican healthcare crisis is immoral.»
Frankly, it just didn’t sound as forceful or have the same impact.
Vice President JD Vance suggested Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., is pivoting left for fear of a primary challenge by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. (Alex Brandon, Pool/AP Photo)
Whatever the immediate toll of the shutdown – military people and hundreds of thousands of civilians not getting paid, food stamps on hold – Vance and Leavitt blamed it on Democratic intransigence. (Those laid off will get back pay once the shutdown ends.)
The vice president said Schumer is moving left because he’s terrified of a primary challenge by AOC. She says her only goal is to «stop this madness.»
The president has been more candid, telling reporters: «We can do things during the shutdown that are irreversible, that are bad for them and irreversible by them. Like cutting vast numbers of people out, cutting things that they like, cutting programs that they like.» Now that’s transparency.
The Dems don’t hold the moral high ground when it comes to kick-the-can votes to delay a shutdown, having frequently used the tactic when they were in charge. While Vance says they’d be happy to talk about healthcare during a seven-week delay, the other party feels they would lose whatever leverage they have, and it would be politically humiliating.
The Democrats are making a more complicated argument about healthcare, and that’s a tougher sell for the many millions who don’t follow the news closely.
KFF, which is Kaiser, says those on Obamacare would get socked if tax credits are allowed to expire at year’s end. Average premiums next year would be $888, but without the tax credits, would jump to $1,593 – a 114 percent increase.
That would really cripple the Affordable Care Act and knock millions off the rolls.
SOCIAL SECURITY, AIRPORTS, FOOD STAMPS: HOW ARE YOU AFFECTED DURING A GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
The Dems’ other objection is to deep cuts in Medicaid, despite Trump’s promise to protect the program. But that’s why we have elections. Having lost the House, Senate and White House, the party can’t expect the GOP to make sweeping changes to its preferred budget.
It just so happens – a coincidence, I’m sure – that the administration yesterday halted $18 billion in funding for two major transportation projects in New York City, expansion of the Second Avenue subway and new train tunnels under the Hudson River.
A shot at Schumer’s hometown? Vance says this is a question of «triage,» saving money on such projects to preserve essential services.
But it’s really a case of Trump going after Democratic priorities, as he said he would, since he preserved funding for one of his pet projects, the mission of returning to the moon, which seems less than vital at the moment.
SUBSCRIBE TO HOWIE’S MEDIA BUZZMETER PODCAST, A RIFF ON THE DAY’S HOTTEST STORIES
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., appeared outraged by an AI image of him shared online by the president. (Nathan Posner/Anadolu/Getty Images)
What really got Jeffries mad after Monday’s unsuccessful White House meeting was a fake AI image posted by the president. It depicted him as having a handlebar mustache and wearing a huge sombrero, with mariachi music in the background.
Jeffries called the parody «racist» and demanded that the president «say it to my face.»
The bottom line, given the atmosphere of mutual distrust, is that this government closure could drag on for awhile. That would gradually boost the pain level, and the Democrats are already at a disadvantage.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
At this point the opposition party is trying to show the public that it can fight, and that, beyond the healthcare battle, may be its main message.
media buzz,donald trump,chuck schumer,congress,white house,government shutdown
INTERNACIONAL
La misteriosa muerte del embajador de Sudáfrica en Francia al caer desde un piso 22: ¿Suicidio o asesinato?
Había sido denunciado por corrupción
La denuncia
Interferencias en investigación
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
EXCLUSIVE: Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., is accusing Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., of refusing to vote to end the government shutdown to kowtow to his left-wing base.
Johnson told Fox News Digital in a sit-down interview that Democrats’ refusal to budge on their current position came up in an hour-long call with President Donald Trump Wednesday afternoon.
«[Trump is] very bothered by that, that Chuck Schumer would do this, Democrats would do this, because we haven’t,» the top House Republican said.
He noted that Democrats had voted on a similar measure to what Republicans are offering on 13 different occasions under former President Joe Biden.
SOCIAL SECURITY, AIRPORTS, FOOD STAMPS: HOW ARE YOU AFFECTED DURING A GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
House Speaker Mike Johnson, right, is criticizing Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s, left, for refusing to agree to a GOP-led plan to avert a government shutdown. (Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)
«And even when the Republicans were in the minority, we did the right thing to keep the government open. And we fully expected that Schumer would do that again, as he always has, but not this time,» Johnson said.
«This is a selfish political calculation he’s made, that he’s got to prove to the far left that he’s going to fight Trump or something. So, we talked about our frustration with that.»
He said Trump appeared «happy» that Republicans remain unified in their federal funding stance but was concerned about the effects of a prolonged shutdown on everyday Americans.
REPUBLICANS ERUPT OVER SHUTDOWN CHAOS, ACCUSE DEMS OF HOLDING GOVERNMENT ‘HOSTAGE’
«But the reason we’re happy about that is because we know we’re doing the right thing for the American people,» Johnson said. «And Chuck Schumer and the Democrats are demonstrating that they are willing to inflict this pain upon the people for their own political purposes. And I think that is a tough thing for them to get over.»
He said of a meeting between congressional leaders and Trump that occurred Monday: «I tried my best in the White House, and he just is in no mood to have a real discussion about these issues. So, we are where we are.»
President Donald Trump, right, salutes Air Force Col. Christopher M. Robinson, commander, 89th Airlift Wing, before boarding Marine One upon his arrival at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, Friday, Sept. 26, 2025. (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez)
Senate Democrats have now rejected a GOP-led plan to fund federal agencies through Nov. 21 three times.
The measure is called a continuing resolution (CR) and is aimed at buying House and Senate negotiators more time to reach a deal on fiscal year 2026 federal funding priorities.
The CR would keep current federal funding levels roughly flat while adding an extra $88 million in security spending for lawmakers, the White House and the judicial branch.
Democrats, furious at being largely sidelined in funding discussions, have signaled they would not accept any bill that does not also extend Obamacare tax subsidies that were enhanced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Those enhanced subsidies are due to expire at the end of this year.
But Johnson, who called the Obamacare subsidies an «end-of-year issue,» argued that the bill was a simple extension of federal funding, leaving Republicans with no realistic path for concessions.
Sen. Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., speaks with reporters near his office on Capitol Hill Sept. 18, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
«If it was not clean and simple, if I had loaded it up with a bunch of Republican partisan priorities, then there would be something for us to negotiate. I could take those things off and offer it again. I sent it over with nothing attached at all,» he said.
«It quite literally is just buying us time to finish the appropriations process, which was being done in a bipartisan manner. So, I don’t have anything to give, there’s nothing I can give. And Chuck Schumer has made such outrageous counter-demands and proposals that he’s the one that has to come to his senses.»
He was referring to Democrats’ counter-proposal for a CR, which would have repealed the Medicaid reforms made in Republicans’ One Big, Beautiful Bill, while restoring funding for NPR and PBS that was cut by the Trump administration earlier this year.
Fox News Digital reached out to Schumer’s office for a response but did not hear back by press time.
house of representatives politics,politics,senate,government shutdown
El fin de “los legales” en la publicidad: ya no habrá mensajes acelerados en los anuncios de radio y TV
El Gobierno se puso en “modo resistencia” ante la ofensiva opositora y los errores propios
Conocé la historia de Luismel Morris, un futbolista cubano que desertó del seleccionado de fútbol para cambiar su vida
Si tú también quieres ver el Spider-Man 4 de Sam Raimi, felicidades, hay alguien trabajando en ello en Hollywood
Democrats at a big disadvantage in shutdown as Trump starts slashing their programs
Axel Kicillof pide deuda por US$1045 millones y pone a prueba la cohesión del PJ en la Legislatura
Emilia Orozco: “Si vuelve el kirchnerismo, todo el esfuerzo que hicieron los argentinos se va a tirar a la basura”
Kicillof habló del triple femicidio y le pidió a Milei que convoque a los gobernadores: “El narcotráfico afecta a toda la Argentina”
Cristina Kirchner chicaneó a Javier Milei: “La Recesión Avanza y los dólares se te siguen yendo”
El desolador llanto de Thiago Medina por sus hijas tras despertar del coma, a 17 días del accidente: “Se largó a llorar cuando le hablaron de las nenas”
POLITICA3 días agoKicillof habló del triple femicidio y le pidió a Milei que convoque a los gobernadores: “El narcotráfico afecta a toda la Argentina”
- POLITICA11 horas ago
Cristina Kirchner chicaneó a Javier Milei: “La Recesión Avanza y los dólares se te siguen yendo”
- CHIMENTOS2 días ago
El desolador llanto de Thiago Medina por sus hijas tras despertar del coma, a 17 días del accidente: “Se largó a llorar cuando le hablaron de las nenas”
