INTERNACIONAL
Hegseth announces Pentagon probe into deadly strike on Iranian school
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The Pentagon said Friday it has opened a formal command investigation into the Feb. 28 strike in Minab, Iran, where Iranian regime officials claim dozens of children were killed in a strike at a school beside a military compound.
Questions continue to mount about possible U.S. involvement in the strike, the intelligence used before it and whether Iran placed military assets near civilians to shield them or weaponize potential casualties.
War Secretary Pete Hegseth said at a Pentagon briefing that U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) has appointed a senior officer from outside the command to lead the review.
«CENTCOM has designated an investigating officer to complete a command investigation,» Hegseth said, noting that the investigator is a general officer from outside the command. «The command investigation will take as long as necessary to address all the matters surrounding this incident.»
CENTCOM ISSUES SAFETY WARNING TO IRANIAN CIVILIANS AS REGIME USES ‘HEAVILY POPULATED’ AREAS FOR LAUNCHES
«There’s only one entity in this conflict, between us and Iran, that never targets civilians, literally never target civilians,» he said, defending U.S. targeting procedures while the investigation unfolds. «We will investigate. We’ll get to the truth and we’ll share it when we have it.»
The strike has drawn scrutiny as the investigation continues without answers.
If U.S. forces carried out the attack, it would raise questions about how American military planners assess civilian risk in densely populated areas and whether safeguards designed to prevent unintended casualties functioned as intended in the opening phase of a high-intensity conflict.
A view of debris at a school in Hormozgan province, Iran, on March 5, 2026. Local authorities reported casualties after strikes in the area from a girls primary school in the city of Minab. The building sustained significant structural damage following two reported air strikes approximately 40 minutes apart. The Pentagon is investigating the strike. (Stringer/Anadolu via Getty Image)
CENTCOM, the military department tasked with overseeing the U.S. operation in Iran and all Middle East operations, has declined to confirm whether American forces launched the missile, saying only that «it would be inappropriate to comment given the incident is under investigation.»
Iranian-American journalist Banafsheh Zand, who has been following the reporting in Iran, pointed to the school that has been there for more than a decade, reported affiliation with Iran’s military.
«The school itself was for the children of the (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) Navy, and it speaks volumes to where the place was and how they use civilian shields,» she said.
The use of human shields is against international humanitarian law.
While the regime claims between 168 fatalities and 180 fatalities, mostly girls between the ages of 7 and 12, along with teachers and parents from the school, Zand told Fox News Digital that there has been no independent confirmation of the reported casualty figures.
«There is no confirmation on the number of people, from anyone other than regime sources,» she said. «Some people in the area said it was 65 boys. Sixty-five boys? What are 65 boys doing in a girls’ school at 10:30 on a Saturday morning?»
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a joint press conference with Admiral Charles Bradford «Brad» Cooper II, Commander of US Central Command, at US Central Command (CENTCOM) headquarters at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Florida, on March 5, 2026. (Octavio JONES / AFP via Getty Images)
Addressing satellite images that appear to show newly dug graves, Zand added: «The number of graves are not in keeping with the number of people that they claim is dead. It doesn’t match up.»
The U.S. government has not confirmed the death toll.
Preliminary findings from U.S. officials suggest the strike was likely carried out by American forces, The New York Times reported Wednesday, though the investigation remains ongoing.
In response to the Times’ reporting, Central Command reiterated to Fox News Digital that the investigation is ongoing.
IRAN UNREST ESCALATES AS GUNFIRE, TEAR GAS HIT UNIVERSITIES AMID LOOMING US STRIKE
Retired Vice Adm. Kevin Donegan, who previously commanded U.S. Naval Forces Central Command and the U.S. 5th Fleet, cautioned against getting ahead of the full review and said U.S. targeting doctrine is designed to prevent civilian tragedies, including legal review and collateral damage assessments before a strike is approved.
A demonstrator holds a picture of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during a rally in Tehran in solidarity with the government against Israel’s attacks and to mark Eid al-Ghadir. (Atta Kenare/Getty Images) (Atta Kenare/Getty Images)
«We actually have judge advocates that sit there and help us through the process of targeting,» Donegan told Fox News Digital.
But even precision-guided weapons do not eliminate uncertainty.
«War isn’t precise,» Donegan said. «Mistakes can be made, and they can happen anywhere in the chain of events.»
Raytheon, the manufacturer of the Tomahawk missile, could not be reached for comment.
Wes Bryant, the Pentagon’s former chief of civilian harm assessments, said his office, the Civilian Protection Center of Excellence, was tasked with advising commanders on targeting and ways to mitigate civilian harm but had been severely curtailed over the past year.
Image shows a girls’ school struck in Minab, Iran. (Stringer/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Bryant said that taken together, the available evidence strongly suggests U.S. involvement.
«All evidence, at this point, points to a U.S. strike,» Bryant told Fox News Digital.
If U.S. forces conducted the strike, Bryant said the more plausible explanation would involve a failure in target identification or civilian risk assessment.
«These munitions have a very small circular probable,» Bryant said. «If it missed, it would have been within a few meters.»
This picture obtained from Iran’s ISNA news agency shows the site of a strike on a girls’ school in Minab, in Iran’s southern Hormozgan province, on Feb. 28, 2026. (Ali Najafi/ISNA/AFP via Getty Images)
Satellite imagery and reporting from Iranian officials indicate the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school sat roughly 600 meters from the adjacent Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps naval facility in Minab, Iran, underscoring how closely civilian and military infrastructure were positioned.
«I’m leaning more toward that this is complete misidentification,» from the U.S., he said, arguing that the likely issue would be a failure to properly vet or update targeting information rather than a random malfunction.
White House spokesperson Anna Kelly told Fox News Digital, «This investigation is ongoing. As we have said, unlike the terrorist Iranian regime, the United States does not target civilians.»
IRAN LOCKS NATION INTO ‘DARKER’ DIGITAL BLACKOUT, VIEWING INTERNET AS AN ‘EXISTENTIAL THREAT’
Possible Tomahawk missile and strike location
Open-source video analysis and reported missile remnants have fueled speculation that the munition resembled a U.S. Tomahawk cruise missile — a weapon Iran does not operate.
The Tomahawk is fielded by the U.S. and a limited number of close allies, including the United Kingdom and Australia, neither of which have been firing missiles in the conflict.
The Tomahawk is a long-range, precision-guided cruise missile capable of striking targets hundreds of miles away and typically carrying a high-explosive warhead.
Independent open-source investigators, including Bellingcat, a Netherlands-based investigative journalism group specializing in open-source analysis, have examined video and satellite imagery from the area and reported that multiple strikes hit the compound within a short time window.
However, commentators on social media have their own theories.
«The wing-to-body ratio of the munition in question matches an Iranian Kh-55–derived Land Attack Cruise Missile,» said podcast host and veteran Matt Tardio on X. «So what could have caused this? Simply put, GPS jamming of an Iranian KH-55. The USA and Israel were, and continue to actively jam the Iranian airspace.»
IRAN WAR, 11 DAYS IN: US CONTROLS SKIES, OIL SURGES AND THE REGION BRACES FOR WHAT’S NEXT
An aerial view shows funerals underway at a graveyard in Minab, Iran, March 3, 2026, for students and staff from a girls school who authorities said were killed in a Feb. 28 strike. (Handout/Getty Images)
Former National Security Council official Javed Ali, now a professor at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, told Fox News Digital the central question is the quality of intelligence that informed the strike decision.
«How solid was the intelligence picture on that facility?» Ali said. «How good was the intelligence that went into what’s called a target package?»
OPERATION EPIC FURY DESTROYS IRAN’S NAVY AND CUTS MISSILE ATTACKS BY 90% IN ONGOING CAMPAIGN
Ali, who previously worked on targeting analysis at the Defense Intelligence Agency, said military strikes are typically built from multiple streams of intelligence — human, technical, geospatial and open source — designed to provide high confidence that a structure is a legitimate military objective.
«Clearly something went wrong,» Ali said.
Civilian proximity raises targeting questions
Bryant said the Pentagon’s Civilian Protection Center of Excellence and broader civilian harm mitigation enterprise were scaled back in 2025, reducing the number of personnel available to conduct investigations into civilian harm.
The center was established by Congress to help the military minimize harm to civilians in conflict, but reporting shows its dedicated staff were folded into broader bureaucratic units or removed as part of a departmental reorganization.
Its teams were designed to work with commanders on target planning to make sure targets were active military sites and advise on the potential for civilian harm, according to Bryant.
A general view of Tehran with smoke visible in the distance after explosions were reported in the city, on March 02, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. (Contributor/Getty Images)
The Pentagon has not publicly detailed the current status or staffing of the office, nor confirmed whether the office is involved in the ongoing Minab, Iran, school investigation.
IRAN OPERATING SECRET ‘BLACK BOX’ SITES HOLDING THOUSANDS IN DETENTION: REPORTS
An open source intelligence expert and former intel official, who requested anonymity, told Fox News Digital the structure resembles the other military buildings that were targeted in the strike, which could help explain how an intelligence misreading might occur and lead analysts to believe the site was another military facility within the compound.
Analysts say when civilian casualties occur during precision strikes, the explanations generally fall into three categories: intelligence failure, technical malfunction or human error.
Mourners attend the funeral of children killed in a reported strike on a primary school in Minab, Hormozgan province, Iran, on March 3, 2026. (Amirhossein Khorgooei/ISNA/AFP via Getty Images)
Amos Yadlin, a former head of Israeli military intelligence, told Fox News Digital incorrect or outdated intelligence could lead to misidentification, while a GPS-guided munition could malfunction or be disrupted. Human error — such as incorrect coordinate entry — is another possibility.
If an investigation ultimately finds negligence or a breakdown in targeting procedures, the U.S. military has a precedent for imposing consequences.
Bryant pointed to the 2015 U.S. strike on a hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan, that killed dozens of patients and medical staff at a facility operated by Doctors Without Borders, the international humanitarian medical charity which a U.S. army investigation later concluded was «a tragic and avoidable accident.»
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
A U.S. military investigation later concluded that airstrike was «a tragic and avoidable accident» caused primarily by human error and procedural failures, with the medical facility mistakenly identified as a combat target.
«In that case, a couple of different commanders were removed,» Bryant said, noting that accountability can range from administrative measures to the revocation of certifications, depending on findings.
war with iran,iran,conflicts defense,pentagon,pete hegseth
Panamá y Ucrania dieron un nuevo paso en su relación bilateral con la firma de una hoja de ruta para el periodo 2026-2029 y un memorando de cooperación académica, durante la primera visita oficial al país de un ministro de Asuntos Exteriores ucraniano.
En paralelo, el gobierno panameño reiteró su posición de respaldo a la soberanía de Ucrania y su rechazo al uso de la fuerza contra otro Estado. El conflicto entre Ucrania y Rusia se remonta al 24 de febrero de 2022, cuando Moscú lanzó una invasión a gran escala sobre territorio ucraniano, desencadenando la mayor guerra en Europa desde la Segunda Guerra Mundial.
Desde entonces han transcurrido más de cuatro años de combates que han dejado decenas de miles de muertos entre fuerzas militares de ambos bandos y miles de víctimas civiles.
La agenda del canciller ucraniano Andrii Sybiha incluyó una reunión con el ministro de Relaciones Exteriores de Panamá, Javier Martínez-Acha Vásquez, en el Palacio Bolívar, sede de la Cancillería.
Allí ambos funcionarios sostuvieron primero un encuentro privado y luego un diálogo ampliado con sus respectivas delegaciones, en el que abordaron temas bilaterales, regionales y multilaterales, además de asuntos vinculados con la seguridad internacional y la cooperación entre ambos países.
Un antecedente relevante de este acercamiento bilateral fue la reunión que sostuvieron en septiembre de 2024, en Nueva York, el presidente panameño José Raúl Mulino y su homólogo ucraniano, Volodímir Zelenski, en el marco de la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas.
En ese encuentro, ambos mandatarios abordaron oportunidades de cooperación y comercio, mientras Ucrania adelantó su intención de abrir una embajada en Panamá, una decisión que ahora se concreta. Panamá, además, reiteró entonces su respaldo a los esfuerzos orientados a alcanzar la paz.
Durante las conversaciones, los ministros subrayaron la importancia del respeto a los principios contenidos en la Carta de las Naciones Unidas, en especial la soberanía, la integridad territorial de los Estados y la primacía del derecho internacional. Panamá también expresó su preocupación por el deterioro de la paz y la seguridad internacionales desde el inicio de la guerra en 2022 y por las consecuencias humanitarias que ese conflicto ha tenido sobre la población civil.
En ese contexto, el gobierno panameño reiteró su rechazo a cualquier violación de la soberanía, la independencia política y la integridad territorial de Ucrania.
También reafirmó su condena al uso de la fuerza de un Estado contra otro, en línea con la posición que ha sostenido en distintos foros internacionales desde el inicio de la invasión rusa. Uno de los principales resultados de la visita fue la firma de la Hoja de Ruta para el Desarrollo de las Relaciones entre la República de Panamá y Ucrania para el periodo 2026-2029.
El documento servirá como marco para profundizar la relación bilateral y promover una mayor cooperación en distintas áreas, entre ellas el intercambio político, la coordinación diplomática y el desarrollo de iniciativas conjuntas.
A ello se sumó la suscripción de un Memorando de Entendimiento sobre Cooperación Académica entre el Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de Ucrania y el Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Panamá.
El acuerdo prevé una colaboración activa entre la Academia Diplomática de Ucrania “Hennadii Udovenko” y la Academia Diplomática y Consular “Ernesto Castillero Pimentel”, con miras a impulsar programas de formación, intercambio de experiencias y fortalecimiento profesional.
Las delegaciones también expresaron interés en ampliar la cooperación en educación, ciencia e innovación tecnológica. Según lo planteado durante el encuentro, ambos países ven espacio para promover proyectos científicos conjuntos, compartir conocimientos y fortalecer los vínculos entre sus instituciones académicas y técnicas.
La visita del canciller ucraniano también incluyó una reunión en la Asamblea Nacional con la presidenta de la Comisión de Relaciones Exteriores, la diputada Walkiria Chandler, y otros legisladores.
En ese encuentro se abordaron temas relacionados con la cooperación parlamentaria y con el fortalecimiento de los vínculos políticos entre Panamá y Ucrania. Otro de los momentos relevantes de la jornada fue la inauguración de la nueva sede diplomática de Ucrania en Panamá, una decisión que refleja el interés de Kiev en reforzar su presencia en América Latina.
El acto fue acompañado por el canciller panameño y por miembros de la delegación oficial ucraniana. Sybiha llegó a Panamá acompañado por una delegación integrada por su esposa, Tetiana Sybiha; la directora para América Latina y el Caribe del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de Ucrania, Oksana Dramaretska; el portavoz de la Cancillería, Heorhii Tykhyi; la consejera de la Dirección de Seguridad Internacional y Defensa, Karyna Rohuila; y el encargado de Negocios de la Embajada de Ucrania en Panamá, Oleksandr Rummo.
La visita tiene un peso diplomático particular porque es la primera vez que un ministro de Asuntos Exteriores de Ucrania realiza una visita oficial a Panamá desde que ambos países establecieron relaciones diplomáticas en 1993.
En más de tres décadas, Panamá y Ucrania han firmado siete acuerdos bilaterales y mantienen otros seis en negociación en áreas como comercio, cooperación técnica, intercambio de información tributaria y combate al tráfico de estupefacientes. Con esta visita, ambos gobiernos buscaron dar una señal de continuidad al diálogo político y abrir nuevas áreas de cooperación.
Tanto Panamá como Ucrania coincidieron en que existe espacio para seguir profundizando los vínculos en ámbitos diplomáticos, académicos, comerciales y tecnológicos en los próximos años.
corresponsal:Desde Panamá
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Iran is deploying explosive-laden drone boats disguised as wooden fishing vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, a defense expert has warned — a move that signals a new phase of hybrid maritime warfare in one of the world’s most critical shipping lanes.
Cameron Chell, CEO of drone technology firm Draganfly, spoke after the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) confirmed that a Marshall Islands–flagged oil tanker was struck March 1 by an Iranian unmanned surface vehicle north of Muscat, Oman.
«UKMTO has received confirmation that the vessel was attacked by an uncrewed surface vehicle (USV), and that the crew has been evacuated to shore,» UKMTO said in a threat assessment.
Reports also indicated that two additional oil tankers were hit March 11 by remote-controlled explosive boats in the Gulf, as Iran intensified attacks on foreign vessels following the start of the U.S. Operation Epic Fury against the regime on Feb. 28.
FIRES RAGE AT IRAN’S BANDAR ABBAS NAVAL HEADQUARTERS, STRAIT OF HORMUZ TRAFFIC STALLED
Persian Gulf shipping dips as Trump positions military against Iran. ( Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
The use of so-called «suicide skiffs» represents a growing asymmetric threat in the narrow, 21-mile-wide Strait, Chell warned, while highlighting the technological capabilities behind these attacks.
«The Iranians probably have use of radio remote control, line of sight, frequency hopping, or encrypted radio communication between the skiffs and the Hormuz shoreline,» Chell told Fox News Digital.
«These can be jammed and tracked, but when there’s 50 of these boats, it’s hard to try to find them all along this shoreline or to find a 20-foot wooden fishing boat that is laden with explosives.
«They can have one person controlling a swarm of 10 boats,» he said before describing how there «could also be autonomous swarming where they might have 10 boats that can act with a large level of independence, because they’re pre-programmed.»
«The boats would be used to ram into targets and explode,» Chell clarified.
EX-NAVY SEAL WARNS WITHDRAWING FROM IRAN NOW WOULD HAND ‘VICTORY’ TO REGIME
Naval units from Iran and Russia simulate the rescue of a hijacked vessel during joint drills at the Port of Bandar Abbas in Hormozgan, Iran, on Feb. 19, 2026. (Iranian Army/Handout/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Chell’s comments followed a March 12 Reuters report stating that six vessels had been attacked in the Gulf and Strait of Hormuz.
Sources said that Iran had also deployed about a dozen mines, complicating efforts to maintain any traffic through the critical waterway.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Sky News Thursday that the U.S. Navy, potentially alongside an international coalition, would escort ships when militarily feasible.
U.K. Defense Secretary John Healey also said discussions were underway with European counterparts stressing the global economic stakes tied to the strait. Chell, however, questioned current defensive readiness.
«The drone defense fleets that the U.S. Navy would not have been set up to take these suicide skiffs out,» Chell said.
«The U.S. would be using manned aircraft in order to take them out, which are fantastic at taking out a large target, but inefficient in taking out 50 boats at one time that are an average of 25 or 30 feet in size, laden with explosives.
IRAN’S DRONE SWARMS CHALLENGE US AIR DEFENSES AS TROOPS IN MIDDLE EAST FACE RISING THREATS
A screenshot of a marine traffic terminal showing vessels in the Strait of Hormuz on March 4, 2026. (Kpler/Marine Traffic)
«Given the Strait’s geography, it would require patrolling by many aircraft and would require pervasive surveillance over the area, a rapid response to any activity that’s happening,» he said.
As Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei vowed to keep the Strait closed as leverage against the U.S. and Israel, oil prices continue to surge, with Chell also highlighting the geographic advantage Iran holds.
«The geographic layout of the Strait lends itself very well to relatively unsophisticated suicide skiffs, unmanned surface vehicles or USVs,» he warned before describing how the area «lends itself to this low-cost, automatic, asymmetric warfare.»
«The Iranians can disguise them as fishing boats and can be anywhere from 12 to 30 feet, and a boat could be of any description,» Chell said.
«These skiffs are equipped with basic remote control capabilities that may or may not be using GPS waypoints or manual remote control.»
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
«The skiffs are not autonomous, because the distance across the Strait is so short, and it’s very flat across this waterway, the communication signal could be carried for quite some time via a line of sight,» he added.
«They could literally have hundreds out there at a time, because they’re also so inexpensive to defend against,» Chell said.
war with iran,iran,mojtaba khamenei,us navy,military,wars
La Justicia dictó prisión preventiva para el hombre que le pegó un cabezazo al diputado libertario en Tucumán
El blooper de Sofía Gonet en una autopista de Miami: “¿Por qué todo nos sale mal siempre?»
Detectaron operaciones sospechosas minutos antes conocerse la inflación: ¿se filtró el dato?
Ucrania inaugura su embajada en Panamá y firma compromisos de cooperación
El viaje especial de Diego Milito para gestionar con el Inter la situación de Valentín Carboni en Racing
Milei propuso a Crexell como embajadora ante Canadá tras el escándalo por su aval a la ley Bases
Muni Seligmann respondió las críticas tras el accidente de su bebé y su viaje a Miami: “Hay que contarlo y naturalizarlo”
El ex novio de Luana de Gran Hermano reveló información sensible sobre su relación: “El bolso tenía plata”
Juan Carlos Schmid deja la conducción de Dragado y Balizamiento después de 33 años
Manuel Adorni explicó por qué viajó con su esposa en el avión presidencial a la gira del Gobierno en Nueva York
CHIMENTOS3 días agoMuni Seligmann respondió las críticas tras el accidente de su bebé y su viaje a Miami: “Hay que contarlo y naturalizarlo”
- CHIMENTOS1 día ago
El ex novio de Luana de Gran Hermano reveló información sensible sobre su relación: “El bolso tenía plata”
- POLITICA3 días ago
Manuel Adorni explicó por qué viajó con su esposa en el avión presidencial a la gira del Gobierno en Nueva York
