Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Hegseth ending military education ties with Harvard amid Trump feud: ‘We train warriors, not wokesters’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Department of War said Friday that it will end all professional military education, fellowships and certificate programs with Harvard University.

Advertisement

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth slammed the university in a video announcement posted on X, saying the department would be cutting ties with Harvard for active-duty service members beginning in the 2026–27 school year — a move he said was «long overdue.»

«Harvard is woke; The War Department is not,» Hegseth stated.

While Hegseth, who has a master’s degree from Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, said the U.S. military has had a «rich tradition» with the Ivy League school, he argued that Harvard has become one of the «red-hot centers of Hate America activism.»

Advertisement

HARVARD KENNEDY SCHOOL ANNOUNCES LAYOFFS AFTER TRUMP CUTS BILLIONS IN FUNDING

War Secretary Pete Hegseth arrives at the U.S. Capitol for a briefing with House and Senate members on Venezuela, in Washington, on Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2026. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

«Too many faculty members openly loathe our military. They cast our armed forces in a negative light and squelch anyone who challenges their leftist political leanings, all while charging enormous tuition. It’s not worth it,» he said.
»They’ve replaced open inquiry and honest debate with rigid orthodoxy.»

Advertisement

The announcement comes amid the Trump administration’s ongoing feud with the Ivy League school.

President Donald Trump said Monday he is seeking $1 billion in damages from Harvard University, which the Trump administration has made a primary target in its effort to leverage federal funding to crack down on antisemitism and «woke» ideology.

40-YEAR HARVARD PROFESSOR PENS SCATHING PIECE ON SCHOOL’S ‘EXCLUSION OF WHITE MALES,’ ANTI-WESTERN TRENDS

Advertisement

Lawyers for the Trump administration have appealed a judge’s order requiring the restoration of $2.7 billion in frozen federal research funding to Harvard. The university sued the administration in April over the funding freeze, arguing in court that the move amounted to an unconstitutional «pressure campaign» aimed at influencing and exerting control over elite academic institutions.

Hegseth also criticized Harvard’s campus environment, alleging that research programs have partnered with the Chinese Communist Party and that university leadership has encouraged an atmosphere that celebrates Hamas, allows attacks on Jews, and prioritizes Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives.

«Why should the War Department support an environment that’s destructive to our nation and the principles that the vast majority of Americans hold dear?» Hegseth said.
»The answer to that question is that we should not, and we will not.»

Advertisement

HARVARD DEAN REMOVED AFTER ANTI-WHITE, ANTI-POLICE SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS RESURFACED

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is pictured at a NATO meeting.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced that military education programs with Harvard University will end in the 2026-27 academic year. (Omar Havana/Getty Images)

«For too long, this department has sent our best and brightest officers to Harvard, hoping the university would better understand and appreciate our warrior class,» he continued. «Instead, too many of our officers came back looking too much like Harvard — heads full of globalist and radical ideologies that do not improve our fighting ranks.»

In addition to Harvard, Hegseth took aim at much of the Ivy League, saying the schools have a «pervasive institutional bias» and a lack of viewpoint diversity, including the «coddling of toxic ideologies,» that he said undercuts the military’s mission.

Advertisement

He said that in the coming weeks, all departments at the Pentagon will evaluate existing graduate programs for active-duty service members at Ivy League schools and other civilian universities.

UNIVERSITIES SLASH 9,000+ POSITIONS IN 2025 AS TRUMP TARGETS FEDERAL FUNDING AND FOREIGN STUDENTS: REPORT

Harvard students walking through gate surrounded by brick wall and building

War Secretary Pete Hegseth described Harvard as one of the «red-hot centers of Hate America activism.» (Associated Press)

«The goal is to determine whether or not they actually deliver cost effective strategic education for future senior leaders, when compared to, say, public universities and our military graduate programs,» he said. «At the War Department, we will strive to maximize taxpayer value in building lethality to establish deterrence. It’s that simple. That no longer includes spending millions of dollars on expensive universities that actively undercut our mission and undercut our country.»

Advertisement

Hegseth concluded his message, saying, «We train warriors, not wokesters. Harvard, good riddance.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Harvard University did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Brian Flood contributed to this report.

pete hegseth,harvard crimson,military,pentagon,college

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Did they get him? Khamenei’s fate remains unknown after Israel strike levels his compound

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

As the smoke was still clearing over Tehran, one question dominated the region and Washington alike: Did they get him?

Advertisement

In the immediate aftermath of the Israel-U.S. strikes, with the Israeli Air Force targeting senior Iranian leadership infrastructure, rumors swirled that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s 86-year-old supreme leader, had been killed.

Satellite images showed heavy damage to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s fortified compound, including buildings believed to house his residence and the so-called House of Leadership. Parts of the complex appeared reduced to rubble.

Regional reports indicated a high-level meeting of Khamenei’s top lieutenants may have been underway when the strike hit. Iranian semi-official media also reported missiles struck near the presidential palace and other leadership sites north of the capital.

Advertisement

Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei makes first public appearance in weeks with fresh U.S. threats. (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader Credit/ASSOCIATED PRESS)

Addressing the nation on Saturday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in Hebrew, «There are more and more signs indicating Khamenei is gone.»

Israeli officials told Fox News Digital they were still assessing the results and said it was too early to confirm the fate of the 86-year-old supreme leader. They did not rule out the possibility that he was killed.

Advertisement

Iranian officials, however, insisted the country’s leadership — including Khamenei and President Masoud Pezeshkian — remained safe, according to The Guardian, despite what they described as an assassination attempt. Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs told the BBC that he was not in a position to confirm whether Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had been eliminated.

IRAN FIRES MISSILES AT US BASES ACROSS MIDDLE EAST AFTER AMERICAN STRIKES ON NUCLEAR, IRGC SITES

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

In this picture released by an official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei stands as army air force staff salute at the start of their meeting in Tehran, Iran, Friday, Feb. 8, 2019. Khamenei is defending «Death to America» chants that are standard fare at anti-U.S. rallies across Iran but says the chanting is aimed at America’s leaders and not its people.  (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP)

The long-serving cleric has survived decades of internal unrest, assassination plots and foreign pressure. He rarely appears in public without layers of security and is believed to operate through a tightly controlled network of loyalists embedded across Iran’s military, intelligence and political institutions.

Advertisement

In an exclusive Fox News Digital report earlier this week, researchers described how Khamenei runs what amounts to a parallel state within Iran’s formal government structure.

«The Bayt is the hidden nerve center of the regime in Iran… it operates as a state within a state,» Kasra Aarabi, director of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) research at United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI), told Fox News Digital.

IRAN COULD ‘ACTIVATE’ HEZBOLLAH IF US TARGETS REGIME, TRUMP’S INNER CIRCLE TO DECIDE: EXPERT

Advertisement
Explosion in Tehran

Smoke rises on the skyline after an explosion in Tehran, Iran, Saturday, Feb. 28, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)

Even if Khamenei himself were removed, Aarabi warned, the institutional machinery he built — involving roughly 4,000 core staff and a broader network of tens of thousands — could continue functioning.

«Even if he is eliminated, the Bayt as an institution enables the Supreme Leader to function,» Aarabi said. «Think of the Supreme Leader as an institution rather than just a single individual.»

That reality complicates the picture.

Advertisement

For decades, Khamenei has positioned himself not merely as a political leader but as the apex of a system designed to survive shocks — whether from protests at home or military pressure abroad.

The 86-year-old cleric has faced repeated waves of unrest, including mass protests in 2009, 2022 and again in early 2026. Each time, his regime cracked down forcefully, consolidating control rather than fracturing.

He has also weathered years of covert operations, cyber campaigns and targeted strikes against key Iranian figures across the region.

Advertisement

Still, the scale of the latest strike appears unprecedented.

If confirmed dead, Khamenei’s killing would mark the most significant decapitation of Iranian leadership since the 1979 revolution. It would also raise immediate questions about succession inside a system he carefully engineered to avoid sudden collapse.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement
Iranian demonstrators protest against the U.S.

A person holds an image of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as Iranian demonstrators protest against the U.S.-Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, Feb. 28, 2026.  (Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters)

If he survived, it would reinforce his reputation for resilience — and underscore how difficult it is to eliminate the core of Iran’s power structure.

For now, officials say assessments are ongoing, and the question may be answered in the very near future.

Advertisement

Related Article

Historic US-Israel strikes on Iran underway as Tehran faces regime survival test



ali khamenei,war with iran,iran,israel,bombings

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Irán afirma que cerró el estratégico estrecho de Ormuz, en un paso audaz que incendia aún más la región

Published

on


En medio de la creciente tensión por los ataques estadounidenses, el régimen de Teherán habría cerrado el paso en el crucial estrecho de Ormuz, un punto de importancia estratégica mundial que separa las costas de Irán y Omán, se encuentra entre el Golfo Pérsico y el Golfo de Omán y por sus aguas se transporta alrededor del 20 por ciento de la producción mundial de petróleo y también de gas.

Irán dice que el estrecho de Ormuz es «inseguro» y está «de facto cerrado», según informaron diferentes medios locales. Pero el Organismo Británico de Comercio Marítimo (UKMTO) negó la información.

Advertisement

«Los Guardianes de la Revolución advirtieron a varios barcos de la inseguridad en torno al estrecho debido a la agresión militar de Estados Unidos e Israel y a la respuesta de Irán, y que no es seguro pasar por el estrecho en este momento», indicó la agencia de prensa Tasnim. «Con el cese del paso de los barcos y petroleros por el estrecho de Ormuz, el estrecho quedó de facto cerrado», agregó.

La misión naval de la Unión Europea en el mar Rojo, Aspides, confirmó a la AFP esta información. Según el teniente coronel Sócrates Ravanos, los buques recibieron mensajes de radio de alta frecuencia en los que el ejército ideológico de Irán afirma que «ningún barco tiene permitido pasar por el estrecho de Ormuz».

El Organismo Británico de Comercio Marítimo, reconoció que ha habido numerosos barcos que transitan por el Golfo Pérsico y que este sábado han enviado señales de radiofrecuencia VHF asegurando que ese estrecho (que separa Irán por el norte y Emiratos Árabes Unidos por el sur ) estaba cerrado. Pero aclaró que esa información no estaba confirmada.

Advertisement

«Esos informes no han podido ser confirmados independientemente», dijo el UKMTO, que añadió que los mensajes que se envían por canales VHF «no son legalmente vinculantes y no constituyen ninguna restricción de navegación según la ley internacional».

El gobierno estadounidense instó el sábado a los barcos comerciales a evitar la región de Oriente Medio tras los ataques aéreos de Estados Unidos e Israel contra Irán, y las represalias de Teherán en distintos puntos de la región.

El estrecho de Ormuz, el golfo Pérsico, el golfo de Omán y el mar Arábigo están sujetos a «actividad militar significativa» y «se recomienda que los buques se mantengan alejados de esta zona», afirmó la Administración Marítima del Departamento de Transporte de Estados Unidos en un comunicado.

Advertisement

Los buques con bandera estadounidense, de propiedad estadounidense o tripulados por estadounidenses también deben mantenerse a 30 millas náuticas de cualquier buque militar de su país para evitar ser confundidos con una amenaza, añadió.

Golpe al mercado petrolero

Advertisement

El ataque de Israel y EE. UU. contra Irán puede impactar en el mercado petrolero ante una posible caída de suministros desde un país que tiene una producción importante y que además podría cerrar al tráfico marítimo el estrecho de Ormuz.

Por este estrecho, que en su punto más angosto mide 54 kilómetros, transitan cada día un promedio de 144 buques, de los que un 37 % son petroleros; 17% buques portacontenedores y 13% graneleros, según datos del informe Revisión del Transporte Marítimo 2025, de ONU Comercio y Desarrollo (UNCTAD).

La Administración de Información Energética de Estados Unidos (EIA) apunta a que en 2024 y el primer trimestre de 2025, esta vía canalizó una parte significativa del comercio marítimo total de petróleo.

Advertisement


La EIA también indica que alrededor de un 20 por ciento del comercio mundial de gas natural licuado fluye por allí, principalmente desde Catar y Emiratos Árabes Unidos hacia mercados de Asia.


Durante años, las autoridades persas ha amenazado en varias ocasiones, tanto a Israel como a Estados Unidos, con bloquear el tránsito marítimo, sobre todo a este último, en respuesta a las sanciones impuestas por Washington por su programa nuclear.


En el escenario de crisis prebélica con Estados Unidos, en febrero de 2026 Irán informó del cierre puntual de ciertas áreas de la zona por la celebración de las maniobras navales Control Inteligente del estrecho de Ormuz.

Advertisement


Con anterioridad, el 21 de junio de 2025 el Parlamento iraní aprobó su cierre después de que la nueva administración estadounidense de Donald Trump ordenara el bombardeó de Irán en el marco del conflicto entre Israel y el país persa.


Por su enclave geográfico, el Golfo Pérsico ha sido escenario de numerosos incidentes en los últimos años, incluidos ataques y confiscaciones de petroleros y cargueros, en medio las tensiones entre Irán y Estados Unidos por las sanciones impuestas por este último a la venta de petróleo iraní.


Un ejemplo fue cuando, en 2018, EE.UU decidió retirarse del acuerdo nuclear firmado entre Irán y las potencias en 2015 al considerar que Teherán mintió sobre su programa atómico al seguir enriqueciendo uranio por encima de los límites permitidos.

Advertisement


En abril de 2019, la situación se agravó después de que EE.UU endureciera las sanciones a la exportación de petróleo por parte de Irán y, como consecuencia, las autoridades iraníes amenazaron con bloquear el estrecho.


En 2021, y debido a que en los últimos años la zona fue escenario de ataques a petroleros, Irán inauguró una estratégica terminal de exportación de petróleo en el mar de Omán, lo que evitó, por primera vez a los cargueros tener que cruzar el estrecho de Ormuz.


El crudo llegaría a la instalación, situada en la ciudad costera de Jask, en la provincia sureña de Hormozgan, a través de un oleoducto que tiene su origen en el campo petrolífero de Goreh, en la región de Bushehr.

Advertisement


Este megaproyecto contó con una tubería que se extiende por 1.000 kilómetros y tiene una capacidad de transferencia de 300.000 barriles de petróleo por día de Goreh a Jask en esta primera fase y, en el futuro, podría alcanzar el millón.

A lo largo de los años, continuaron las tensiones como en abril de 2024, tras el ataque contra el consulado iraní en Damasco en el que murieron siete guardias revolucionarios, y del que Teherán acusó a Tel Aviv y que estuvo a punto de provocar el cierre de este estrecho.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Omar, Squad lash out at Trump in response to Iran strike: ‘Illegal regime change war’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Democratic Reps. Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, both progressive «Squad» members, lashed out at President Donald Trump on Saturday in response to his decision to strike Iran. 

Advertisement

«Trump has launched an illegal regime change war,» Omar posted on X. «As someone who has survived the horrors of war, I know military strikes will not make us safer; they will inflame tensions and push the region further into chaos.»

Omar, who fled Somalia as a refugee as a young child, added, «When we abandon diplomacy, we choose destruction.»

Tlaib reacted on social media to a clip of Trump acknowledging that there may be American casualties in this attack. 

Advertisement

Rep. Ilhan Omar, with Rep. Rashida Tlaib at her side, speaks at a press conference. (Renee Jones Schneider/Star Tribune via Getty Images)

«He doesn’t care about our loved ones in the military,» Tlaib posted on X in a message that was reposted by Omar. «He doesn’t care about the fact that Americans don’t want this war.»

«He doesn’t care about the Iranian people. He is corrupted. Don’t fall for the lies.»

Advertisement

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York also slammed President Donald Trump for abandoning diplomacy in favor of launching an attack against Iran, predicting the outcome will be «catastrophic.»

«The American people are once again dragged into a war they did not want by a president who does not care about the long-term consequences of his actions. This war is unlawful. It is unnecessary. And it will be catastrophic,» Ocasio-Cortez said.

«Just this week, Iran and the United States were negotiating key measures that could have staved off war. The President walked away from these discussions and chose war instead. President Trump flippantly acknowledged the possibility of American casualties, stating ‘that often happens in war,’» she continued. «Mr. President: this was not an inevitability. This is a deliberate choice of aggression when diplomacy and security were within reach. Stop lying to the American people.

Advertisement

Democratic Rep. Greg Casar, another progressive House member associated with the informal «Squad» group, called Trump’s actions an «illegal war» in a post on X.

«Yet again, an American president is sending other people’s kids to risk their lives in a senseless regime change war,» Casar said. 

The U.S. and Israel launched the joint attack just after 9 a.m. local time in what the Pentagon has dubbed «Operation Epic Fury.»

Advertisement

IF KHAMENEI FALLS, WHO TAKES IRAN? STRIKES WILL EXPOSE POWER VACUUM — AND THE IRGC’S GRIP

In video remarks posted to Truth Social, Trump addressed the Iranian people directly and told them to «seize control of [their] destiny.»

«The hour of your freedom is at hand. Stay sheltered. Don’t leave your home. It’s very dangerous outside. Bombs will be dropping everywhere. When we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take,» Trump said. «This will be, probably, your only chance for generations. For many years, you have asked for America’s help, but you never got it. No President was willing to do what I am willing to do tonight. Now you have a President who is giving you what you want.»

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

AOC during a news conference

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

While Trump focused some of his message on empowering the people of Iran, he stated that the intent of the operation is to «defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime,» which he described as «vicious» and «very hard, terrible people.»

Trump also said that while there may be American casualties as a result, the mission is «noble» as it is aimed at stopping a «wicked, radical dictatorship» from threatening American national security interests and destabilizing the Middle East.

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Michael Sinkewicz and Alex Nitzberg contributed to this report

Related Article

Fetterman praises Operation Epic Fury: Trump is 'willing to do what's right'

politics,iran,ilhan omar,rashida tlaib

Continue Reading

Tendencias