Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Ilhan Omar demands impeachment of Noem amid DHS funding battle: ‘We must abolish ICE’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., held a press conference alongside her fellow «Squad» lawmaker Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., during which she continued to demand retribution against federal law enforcement in the wake of two agitators in Minneapolis being fatally shot by federal immigration officials.

Advertisement

The press conference was held one day after Omar was sprayed with an unknown substance at a town hall event she held Tuesday evening, garnering widespread news attention. 

In addition to calling for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to be impeached and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to be abolished, Omar also demanded the federal immigration agents involved in the recent Minneapolis shootings be prosecuted and Democrats «vote no» on a bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security and ICE.

ILHAN OMAR HIT WITH UNKNOWN SPRAY AND OTHER KEY MOMENTS FROM CHAOTIC MINNEAPOLIS TOWN HALL

Advertisement

A man got up during a press conference with Ilhan Omar and sprayed her with an unknown substance on Tuesday, Jan. 27th, 2026.  (Fox News)

«Voting no on the funding bill is the bare minimum. Backing the resolution to impeach Kristi Noem is the bare minimum. Holding law-breaking ICE agents legally accountable is the bare minimum,» Omar told those in attendance at her presser held outside Karmel Mall in Minneapolis, where there are several Somali-owned businesses. «We must abolish ICE. This moment demands it.»

Omar’s signal that she is digging in on the DHS funding bill, illustrates a broader coalition of Democrats who are largely unified in their opposition to the legislation in the wake of the federal officer-involved shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti. 

Advertisement

If an agreement is not made by Saturday at midnight, a lapse in appropriations would incur, but because the date falls on a weekend, Congress will have some time to rectify any differences before the major impact of the appropriations lapse is truly felt. 

The White House invited Senate Democrats to discuss the various government funding options, Fox News learned, but instead of taking them up on the offer, Senate Democrat leadership unveiled a list of demands to rein in ICE agents in exchange for their votes to avert a shutdown.

SENATE REPUBLICANS TEE UP KEY SHUTDOWN TEST VOTE AS DEMOCRATS DIG IN ON DHS FUNDING  

Advertisement
The United States Capitol building surrounded by falling money

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

During Omar’s Wednesday press conference, the progressive lawmaker described the federal government’s deportation enforcement as a «federal occupation» and «state-sanctioned violence and political retribution.»

«We know this is not about public safety or immigration enforcement. It is state-sanctioned violence and political retribution,» Omar said to a crowd of supporters. «What is unfolding in our state is not accidental. It is part of a coordinated effort to target black and brown immigrant and Muslim communities through fear, racial profiling and intimidation from this administration’s immigration agenda is not about law enforcement.»

During the press conference, Pressley praised Omar for her «steadfast leadership» and echoed some of Omar’s phrasing.

Advertisement
Rep. Ayanna Pressley

Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., listens to testimony from Minnesota lawmakers about fraud investigations in their home state during a hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 7, 2026, in Washington, D.C.  (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«We have an occupant in the Oval Office who traffics in hate, is hellbent on inflicting hurt and harm and trauma on everyone who calls this country home with a laser focus on our most vulnerable,» Pressley said when given the microphone at the press conference. «He has governed with malice and used Ice agents to terrorize our cities for families apart, operating with impunity. Rogue masked agents who violate people’s rights in the name of so-called law and order. Yet they detain, deport and kill our neighbors in cold blood without due process.»

Fox News Digital’s Alex Miler contributed to this report.

Advertisement

ilhan omar,homeland security,kristi noem,immigration,minnesota,minneapolis st paul,the squad

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Democrats buck party leaders to defend Trump’s ‘decisive action’ on Iran

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump’s joint strikes on Iran are exposing a divide in both parties, as several Democrats come to the president’s defense while a handful of Republicans question his constitutional authority.

Advertisement

Trump announced U.S. and Israeli forces targeted Iranian leadership and military sites in the early hours of Saturday morning, catching millions of Americans — and the majority of lawmakers in Congress — by surprise. 

A handful of House Democrats are justifying the operation, bucking most of their party, who are calling the operation a reckless and illegal action. On the other hand, at least three Republican lawmakers are signaling that the news gave them some pause as of Saturday morning.

Rep. Greg Landsman, D-Ohio, said that the strikes «are targeting military infrastructure —- with warnings to Iranian civilians to take shelter away from these military targets.»

Advertisement

Democrats like Rep. Josh Gottheimer are breaking from their party to justify President Donald Trump’s joint operation with Israel. (Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

«I want a lasting peace for everyone in the region — from the Iranian people to the Lebanese, Palestinians, Syrians, Iraqis, Jordanians, and Israelis. I hope these targeted strikes on the Iranian regime’s military assets ends the regime’s mayhem and bloodshed and makes way for this lasting peace in the region,» Landsman said.

«Thank you to our brave service members who are leading this effort, and I pray their work will finally free the people of Iran and those in the region from more violence or war.»

Advertisement

Reps. Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y., and Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., similarly put the onus on Iran, as did Sens. Jacky Rosen, D-Nev., and John Fetterman, D-Pa.

ISRAEL LAUNCHES PREEMPTIVE STRIKE AGAINST IRAN, DEFENSE MINISTER SAYS

On the Republican side, Reps. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., are concerned about how actions against Iran could run afoul of Congress’ own constitutional authority.

Advertisement

«We need a government small enough to fit within the Constitution. We need a government effective enough to solve problems and serve its own people. Or, we need a new Constitution,» Davidson posted on X. 

When another user asked if he supported Trump’s actions against Iran, Davidson replied, «No. War requires congressional authorization.»

Representative Thomas Massie questions US Attorney General Pam Bondi

Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., questions Attorney General Pam Bondi before a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Feb. 11, 2026. (Robert Schmidt/AFP via Getty)

ISRAEL TARGETS IRAN’S SUPREME LEADER IN SWEEPING STRIKES AS US JOINS ‘OPERATION EPIC FURY’

Advertisement

Massie, a longtime critic of foreign intervention, went so far as to introduce a resolution alongside Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., to rein in Trump’s war powers. House Democrats are demanding a vote on that resolution as soon as next week.

Landsman told NOTUS that he would vote against such a measure if it came to the House floor.

Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., while similarly praising the military’s moves, refused to tell Fox News Digital if he would support the resolution via a spokesperson.

Advertisement

«Today, the United States, with our key democratic ally Israel, took decisive action to defend our national security, fight terror, protect our allies, and stand with the Iranian people who have been massacred in the streets for demanding freedom from the murderous Iranian regime,» Gottheimer said in a statement.

«I applaud the extraordinary bravery and professionalism of our servicemembers and pray for their safety as Iran and its terrorist proxies retaliate against American bases and our partners in the region.»

He, like Suozzi and Rosen, called for a classified briefing on the operation’s details.

Advertisement

GULF STATES CONDEMN IRANIAN RETALIATORY STRIKES ON THEIR TERRITORIES FOLLOWING US-ISRAELI OPERATION

«I agree with the President’s objectives that Iran can never be allowed to obtain nuclear capabilities. The President must now clearly define the national security objective and articulate his plan to avoid another costly, prolonged war in the Middle East,» Suozzi said in his own statement.

Fetterman, meanwhile, has been among the Democrats most full-throated in his support.

Advertisement

«President Trump has been willing to do what’s right and necessary to produce real peace in the region. God bless the United States, our great military, and Israel,» he posted on X early Saturday morning, among the first lawmakers to sound off.

Iranian demonstrators protest against the U.S.

A person holds an image of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as Iranian demonstrators protest against the U.S.-Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, Feb. 28, 2026.  (Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters)

He said of the war powers vote, «I’m a hard no. My vote is Operation Epic Fury.»

It’s a stark contrast to the majority of Democratic lawmakers who have lambasted Trump for not getting authorization from Congress before the strikes.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., accused Trump of moving to «abandon diplomacy and launch a massive military attack has left American troops vulnerable to Iran’s retaliatory actions.»

In the Senate, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said, «Confronting Iran’s malign regional activities, nuclear ambitions, and harsh oppression of the Iranian people demands American strength, resolve, regional coordination, and strategic clarity. Unfortunately, President Trump’s fitful cycles of lashing out and risking wider conflict are not a viable strategy.»

Advertisement

Related Article

JONATHAN TURLEY: Trump strikes Iran — precedent and history are on his side

congress,war with iran,house of representatives politics,foreign policy senate,donald trump,politics

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Did they get him? Khamenei’s fate remains unknown after Israel strike levels his compound

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

As the smoke was still clearing over Tehran, one question dominated the region and Washington alike: Did they get him?

Advertisement

In the immediate aftermath of the Israel-U.S. strikes, with the Israeli Air Force targeting senior Iranian leadership infrastructure, rumors swirled that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s 86-year-old supreme leader, had been killed.

Satellite images showed heavy damage to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s fortified compound, including buildings believed to house his residence and the so-called House of Leadership. Parts of the complex appeared reduced to rubble.

Regional reports indicated a high-level meeting of Khamenei’s top lieutenants may have been underway when the strike hit. Iranian semi-official media also reported missiles struck near the presidential palace and other leadership sites north of the capital.

Advertisement

Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei makes first public appearance in weeks with fresh U.S. threats. (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader Credit/ASSOCIATED PRESS)

Addressing the nation on Saturday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in Hebrew, «There are more and more signs indicating Khamenei is gone.»

Israeli officials told Fox News Digital they were still assessing the results and said it was too early to confirm the fate of the 86-year-old supreme leader. They did not rule out the possibility that he was killed.

Advertisement

Iranian officials, however, insisted the country’s leadership — including Khamenei and President Masoud Pezeshkian — remained safe, according to The Guardian, despite what they described as an assassination attempt. Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs told the BBC that he was not in a position to confirm whether Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had been eliminated.

IRAN FIRES MISSILES AT US BASES ACROSS MIDDLE EAST AFTER AMERICAN STRIKES ON NUCLEAR, IRGC SITES

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

In this picture released by an official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei stands as army air force staff salute at the start of their meeting in Tehran, Iran, Friday, Feb. 8, 2019. Khamenei is defending «Death to America» chants that are standard fare at anti-U.S. rallies across Iran but says the chanting is aimed at America’s leaders and not its people.  (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP)

The long-serving cleric has survived decades of internal unrest, assassination plots and foreign pressure. He rarely appears in public without layers of security and is believed to operate through a tightly controlled network of loyalists embedded across Iran’s military, intelligence and political institutions.

Advertisement

In an exclusive Fox News Digital report earlier this week, researchers described how Khamenei runs what amounts to a parallel state within Iran’s formal government structure.

«The Bayt is the hidden nerve center of the regime in Iran… it operates as a state within a state,» Kasra Aarabi, director of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) research at United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI), told Fox News Digital.

IRAN COULD ‘ACTIVATE’ HEZBOLLAH IF US TARGETS REGIME, TRUMP’S INNER CIRCLE TO DECIDE: EXPERT

Advertisement
Explosion in Tehran

Smoke rises on the skyline after an explosion in Tehran, Iran, Saturday, Feb. 28, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)

Even if Khamenei himself were removed, Aarabi warned, the institutional machinery he built — involving roughly 4,000 core staff and a broader network of tens of thousands — could continue functioning.

«Even if he is eliminated, the Bayt as an institution enables the Supreme Leader to function,» Aarabi said. «Think of the Supreme Leader as an institution rather than just a single individual.»

That reality complicates the picture.

Advertisement

For decades, Khamenei has positioned himself not merely as a political leader but as the apex of a system designed to survive shocks — whether from protests at home or military pressure abroad.

The 86-year-old cleric has faced repeated waves of unrest, including mass protests in 2009, 2022 and again in early 2026. Each time, his regime cracked down forcefully, consolidating control rather than fracturing.

He has also weathered years of covert operations, cyber campaigns and targeted strikes against key Iranian figures across the region.

Advertisement

Still, the scale of the latest strike appears unprecedented.

If confirmed dead, Khamenei’s killing would mark the most significant decapitation of Iranian leadership since the 1979 revolution. It would also raise immediate questions about succession inside a system he carefully engineered to avoid sudden collapse.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement
Iranian demonstrators protest against the U.S.

A person holds an image of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as Iranian demonstrators protest against the U.S.-Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, Feb. 28, 2026.  (Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters)

If he survived, it would reinforce his reputation for resilience — and underscore how difficult it is to eliminate the core of Iran’s power structure.

For now, officials say assessments are ongoing, and the question may be answered in the very near future.

Advertisement

Related Article

Historic US-Israel strikes on Iran underway as Tehran faces regime survival test



ali khamenei,war with iran,iran,israel,bombings

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Irán afirma que cerró el estratégico estrecho de Ormuz, en un paso audaz que incendia aún más la región

Published

on


En medio de la creciente tensión por los ataques estadounidenses, el régimen de Teherán habría cerrado el paso en el crucial estrecho de Ormuz, un punto de importancia estratégica mundial que separa las costas de Irán y Omán, se encuentra entre el Golfo Pérsico y el Golfo de Omán y por sus aguas se transporta alrededor del 20 por ciento de la producción mundial de petróleo y también de gas.

Irán dice que el estrecho de Ormuz es «inseguro» y está «de facto cerrado», según informaron diferentes medios locales. Pero el Organismo Británico de Comercio Marítimo (UKMTO) negó la información.

Advertisement

«Los Guardianes de la Revolución advirtieron a varios barcos de la inseguridad en torno al estrecho debido a la agresión militar de Estados Unidos e Israel y a la respuesta de Irán, y que no es seguro pasar por el estrecho en este momento», indicó la agencia de prensa Tasnim. «Con el cese del paso de los barcos y petroleros por el estrecho de Ormuz, el estrecho quedó de facto cerrado», agregó.

La misión naval de la Unión Europea en el mar Rojo, Aspides, confirmó a la AFP esta información. Según el teniente coronel Sócrates Ravanos, los buques recibieron mensajes de radio de alta frecuencia en los que el ejército ideológico de Irán afirma que «ningún barco tiene permitido pasar por el estrecho de Ormuz».

El Organismo Británico de Comercio Marítimo, reconoció que ha habido numerosos barcos que transitan por el Golfo Pérsico y que este sábado han enviado señales de radiofrecuencia VHF asegurando que ese estrecho (que separa Irán por el norte y Emiratos Árabes Unidos por el sur ) estaba cerrado. Pero aclaró que esa información no estaba confirmada.

Advertisement

«Esos informes no han podido ser confirmados independientemente», dijo el UKMTO, que añadió que los mensajes que se envían por canales VHF «no son legalmente vinculantes y no constituyen ninguna restricción de navegación según la ley internacional».

El gobierno estadounidense instó el sábado a los barcos comerciales a evitar la región de Oriente Medio tras los ataques aéreos de Estados Unidos e Israel contra Irán, y las represalias de Teherán en distintos puntos de la región.

El estrecho de Ormuz, el golfo Pérsico, el golfo de Omán y el mar Arábigo están sujetos a «actividad militar significativa» y «se recomienda que los buques se mantengan alejados de esta zona», afirmó la Administración Marítima del Departamento de Transporte de Estados Unidos en un comunicado.

Advertisement

Los buques con bandera estadounidense, de propiedad estadounidense o tripulados por estadounidenses también deben mantenerse a 30 millas náuticas de cualquier buque militar de su país para evitar ser confundidos con una amenaza, añadió.

Golpe al mercado petrolero

Advertisement

El ataque de Israel y EE. UU. contra Irán puede impactar en el mercado petrolero ante una posible caída de suministros desde un país que tiene una producción importante y que además podría cerrar al tráfico marítimo el estrecho de Ormuz.

Por este estrecho, que en su punto más angosto mide 54 kilómetros, transitan cada día un promedio de 144 buques, de los que un 37 % son petroleros; 17% buques portacontenedores y 13% graneleros, según datos del informe Revisión del Transporte Marítimo 2025, de ONU Comercio y Desarrollo (UNCTAD).

La Administración de Información Energética de Estados Unidos (EIA) apunta a que en 2024 y el primer trimestre de 2025, esta vía canalizó una parte significativa del comercio marítimo total de petróleo.

Advertisement


La EIA también indica que alrededor de un 20 por ciento del comercio mundial de gas natural licuado fluye por allí, principalmente desde Catar y Emiratos Árabes Unidos hacia mercados de Asia.


Durante años, las autoridades persas ha amenazado en varias ocasiones, tanto a Israel como a Estados Unidos, con bloquear el tránsito marítimo, sobre todo a este último, en respuesta a las sanciones impuestas por Washington por su programa nuclear.


En el escenario de crisis prebélica con Estados Unidos, en febrero de 2026 Irán informó del cierre puntual de ciertas áreas de la zona por la celebración de las maniobras navales Control Inteligente del estrecho de Ormuz.

Advertisement


Con anterioridad, el 21 de junio de 2025 el Parlamento iraní aprobó su cierre después de que la nueva administración estadounidense de Donald Trump ordenara el bombardeó de Irán en el marco del conflicto entre Israel y el país persa.


Por su enclave geográfico, el Golfo Pérsico ha sido escenario de numerosos incidentes en los últimos años, incluidos ataques y confiscaciones de petroleros y cargueros, en medio las tensiones entre Irán y Estados Unidos por las sanciones impuestas por este último a la venta de petróleo iraní.


Un ejemplo fue cuando, en 2018, EE.UU decidió retirarse del acuerdo nuclear firmado entre Irán y las potencias en 2015 al considerar que Teherán mintió sobre su programa atómico al seguir enriqueciendo uranio por encima de los límites permitidos.

Advertisement


En abril de 2019, la situación se agravó después de que EE.UU endureciera las sanciones a la exportación de petróleo por parte de Irán y, como consecuencia, las autoridades iraníes amenazaron con bloquear el estrecho.


En 2021, y debido a que en los últimos años la zona fue escenario de ataques a petroleros, Irán inauguró una estratégica terminal de exportación de petróleo en el mar de Omán, lo que evitó, por primera vez a los cargueros tener que cruzar el estrecho de Ormuz.


El crudo llegaría a la instalación, situada en la ciudad costera de Jask, en la provincia sureña de Hormozgan, a través de un oleoducto que tiene su origen en el campo petrolífero de Goreh, en la región de Bushehr.

Advertisement


Este megaproyecto contó con una tubería que se extiende por 1.000 kilómetros y tiene una capacidad de transferencia de 300.000 barriles de petróleo por día de Goreh a Jask en esta primera fase y, en el futuro, podría alcanzar el millón.

A lo largo de los años, continuaron las tensiones como en abril de 2024, tras el ataque contra el consulado iraní en Damasco en el que murieron siete guardias revolucionarios, y del que Teherán acusó a Tel Aviv y que estuvo a punto de provocar el cierre de este estrecho.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias