Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Instead of impeachment, Dems are using Article II challenges to impede Trump this time

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Democrats tenaciously working to thwart the second Trump administration seemingly have thrown out their playbook from the president’s first administration — abandoning repeated attempts to impeach President Donald Trump in favor of broadening their focus on leveraging Article II of the Constitution to impede MAGA policies. 

Advertisement

Democrats, since the early days of Trump’s second presidency, have accused him of taking steps that amount to a «gross overreach of presidential authority» or launching «illegal power grabs,» most notably in response to some of the more than 200 executive orders the president has signed this term. Lawsuits challenging the administration also have focused language on claims Trump is exceeding his executive authority, sparking some policies to get tied up in the courts. 

Article II of the Constitution lays out the foundation for the balance of power between the office of the president and other branches of the government, including establishing the executive branch. Section II of Article II details the duties and powers of a president. 

WHITE HOUSE REBUKES ‘EGREGIOUS’ COURT ORDER BLOCKING TROOP DEPLOYMENTS AMID PORTLAND UNREST

Advertisement

Political foes have turned to Article II in their legal battles against President Donald Trump.  (Alex Brandon/The Associated Press)

Political foes have turned to Article II in their legal battles against Trump, repeatedly claiming he has exceeded his authority. But the White House says that’s not true. 

«Trump Derangement Syndrome takes on many forms — despite the Democrats’ failure to stop President Trump’s incredibly popular agenda in his first term, they’re trying a new strategy this time and failing again,» White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told Fox News Digital Thursday when asked about the increase in claims and cases claiming Trump is overstepping his presidential bounds. 

Advertisement

«The Trump Administration’s policies have been consistently upheld by the Supreme Court as lawful despite an unprecedented number of legal challenges and unlawful lower court rulings from far-left liberal activist judges,» she continued. «The president will continue implementing the policy agenda that the American people voted for in November and will continue to be vindicated by higher courts when liberal activist judges attempt to intervene.» 

First term impeachment efforts 

Trump’s first administration was underscored by two impeachment efforts, which landed Trump as the first president in U.S. history to be impeached twice. Trump was acquitted by the Senate both times. 

The first impeachment effort in 2019 accused Trump of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress related to allegedly seeking foreign interference from Ukraine to boost his re-election efforts in 2020. 

Advertisement

The focus of that impeachment focused on a July 2019 phone call in which Trump pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to launch investigations into the Biden family’s business dealings in Ukraine, including Hunter Biden’s business dealings with Burisma holdings company. Biden was under federal investigation at the time. 

NEWSOM WARNS AMERICANS ‘YOU WILL LOSE YOUR COUNTRY’ UNDER TRUMP AT CALIFORNIA SUMMIT

The House impeached Trump on both articles of impeachment in December 2019, with the Senate voting to acquit Trump on both articles of impeachment in February 2020. 

Advertisement

Months later, Democrats teed up another Trump impeachment after the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. 

Trump notched another first, when the Senate tried a former president after the House voted to impeach him just a week before Joe Biden was inaugurated as the nation’s 46th president. The Senate ultimately acquitted Trump in the case. 

The second impeachment focused on the breach of the U.S. Capitol by throngs of Trump supporters when the Senate and House convened to certify Biden’s 2020 election win. Trump was accused of working to overturn the results of the election and that he incited an insurrection with rhetoric regarding the election ahead of the Capitol breach. 

Advertisement

«I will never forgive the people who stormed the Capitol for the trauma that they caused in our young people, our members of the press who were covering that day, our staffers, the maintenance crew, the people who keep the Capitol neat and clean,» then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said in an interview on MSNBC in 2022.  

«This was a disgrace. And the president instigated an insurrection, refused to stop it and as those films show, would not, in a timely fashion, allow the National Guard to come in and stop it. And that is sinful,» she continued.

The Senate acquitted Trump of the impeachment charge of inciting an insurrection in February 2021. 

Advertisement

The impeachment efforts followed Democrats threatening and vowing to impeach Trump at various points throughout his first administration. 

Jan 6 violent insurrection

In this Jan. 6, 2021, file photo, rioters, loyal to President Donald Trump, storm the Capitol in Washington.  (John Minchillo, File/The Associated Press)

«I rise today, Mr. Speaker, to call for the impeachment of the President of the United States of America for obstruction of justice. I do not do this for political purposes, Mr. Speaker. I do this because I believe in the great ideals that this country stands for — liberty and justice for all, the notion that we should have government of the people, by the people, for the people,» Texas Democratic Rep. Al Green declared in May 2017 in regard to former FBI Director James Comey’s investigation into former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.

TRUMP HAS NOW BEEN IN OFFICE FOR SIX MONTHS, FOR THE SECOND TIME. HERE ARE THE HIGHLIGHTS

Advertisement

«The time has come to make clear to the American people and to this president that his train of injuries to our Constitution must be brought to an end through impeachment,» Tennessee Democrat Rep. Steve Cohen said in November 2017 over claims Trump obstructed justice when he fired Comey in May 2017. 

Out of office court battles

Trump’s four years after his first administration were riddled with a handful of civil and criminal cases, including standing trial in New York when he was found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records in May 2024. 

District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office worked to prove that Trump falsified the business records to conceal a $130,000 payment to former porn star Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 election to quiet her claims of an alleged 2006 affair with Trump. Trump has maintained his innocence in the case, and was sentenced after his election win to an unconditional discharge, meaning he faced no prison time or fines. 

Advertisement

Trump also was indicted in Georgia on racketeering charges over claims he attempted to overturn the state’s 2020 election results, which the president denied. That case was put on hold after District Attorney Fani Willis was disqualified from prosecuting it. 

Trump in NY Court

Then-former President Trump appears in Manhattan Criminal Court for his hush money trial in New York City.  (Steven Hirsch-Pool/Getty Images)

A pair of federal criminal cases were dismissed, including one that alleged Trump mishandled sensitive government documents at his Florida Mar-a-Lago home after his first presidency, as well as another claiming Trump attempted to overturn the 2020 election results. Special counsel Jack Smith oversaw both cases. 

Trump also faced civil cases, including New York Attorney General Letitia James accusing Trump and the Trump Organization of inflating asset values. In another case, E. Jean Carroll, a former columnist who alleges Trump raped her in a New York City department store dressing room in the 1990s, accused Trump of defamation in a 2022 case. 

Advertisement

Trump railed against the accusations and cases as examples of lawfare to prevent him from winning a second presidency, taking a victory lap upon his 2024 win that the efforts failed. 

«These cases, like all of the other cases I have been forced to go through, are empty and lawless, and should never have been brought,» Trump wrote on Truth Social in November 2024, when Smith announced he would drop the felony cases. 

TRUMP IS ‘UNIQUELY POSITIONED TO AVOID’ FATE OF MOST TWO-TERM PRESIDENTS, WASHINGTON POST EDITORIAL EXPLAINS

Advertisement

«It was a political hijacking, and a low point in the History of our Country that such a thing could have happened, and yet, I persevered, against all odds, and WON. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!» Trump added.

Second term Article II allegations 

 Trump’s second administration has faced more than 400 lawsuits, according to Just Security’s tracker, with many challenging his executive orders to reduce the size of the federal government, eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion programs, protect girls’ sports by barring biological male participation, and remove millions of illegal immigrants who have entered the U.S. in recent years.

Trump and his administration are in the midst of cleaning up U.S. cities that historically have been rocked by crime, including working to remove illegal immigrants residing in the cities. Most recently, Trump ordered the National Guard to Portland, Oregon, in response to «radical left terrorism» in the city, specifically members of the recently-designated domestic terrorism organization, Antifa. 

Advertisement
Federal agents outside an ICE facility in Portland, Oregon

Federal agents, including members of the Department of Homeland Security, the Border Patrol, and police officers, attempt to keep protesters back outside a downtown U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility on Oct. 6, 2025, in Portland, Oregon.  (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

«The Radical Left’s reign of terror in Portland ends now, with President Donald J. Trump mobilizing federal resources to stop Antifa-led hellfire in its tracks. While Democrat politicians deny reality, it’s obvious what’s happening in Portland isn’t protest; it’s premeditated anarchy that has scarred the city for years — leaving officers battered, citizens terrorized, and property defaced,» the White House said in an announcement that Trump was deploying federal resources to Portland on Sept. 30. 

WHITE HOUSE SAYS ‘THE REAL CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS IS TAKING PLACE WITHIN OUR JUDICIAL BRANCH’

«What President Trump is trying to do is an abuse of power,» Democratic Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek said in September of Trump’s order to deploy the troops to Portland. «And it is a threat to our democracy. Governors should be in command of their National Guards, our citizens soldiers who sign up to stand up in an emergency to deal with real problems.»

Advertisement

Oregon sued the Trump administration over the order, claiming Trump lacked the authority to deploy the National Guard. 

U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut issued a temporary restraining order halting Trump’s plan to deploy 200 Oregon National Guard troops, then again on Sunday expanded the order to bar the administration from deploying any National Guard units from any state to Oregon pending further proceedings. Immergut determined Trump’s order likely exceeded his presidential authority. 

The White House has hit back that Trump is within his presidential limits. 

Advertisement

«I think her opinion is untethered in reality and in the law,» Leavitt told reporters at a White House press briefing. «The president is using his authority as commander in chief, U.S. code 12 406, which clearly states that the president has the right to call up the National Guard and in cases where he deems it’s appropriate. … The ICE facility has been really under siege. And, by these anarchists outside, they have been, disrespecting law enforcement. They’ve been inciting violence.»

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals lifted Immergut’s ruling that blocked the Oregon National Guard troops from deploying to Portland, but the other ruling barring any National Guard troops from deploying to Portland remains in effect. 

Advertisement

white house,donald trump,federal courts,law

INTERNACIONAL

La ONU denunció el secuestro del jefe de UNICEF en Yemen junto a otros 19 empleados tras una redada de los rebeldes hutíes

Published

on


El máximo responsable de UNICEF en Yemen, Peter Hawkins (Fuente)

Los rebeldes hutíes de Yemen secuestraron a 20 empleados de las Naciones Unidas en Saná, entre los que se encuentra el máximo responsable de UNICEF en dicho territorio, Peter Hawkins, tras allanar sin autorización el complejo del organismo internacional.

Un funcionario de la ONU indicó a la AFP que Hawkins “es uno de los 15 empleados internacionales detenidos en el complejo” asaltado el sábado por los hutíes, además de cinco trabajadores nacionales.

Advertisement

Jean Alam, portavoz del coordinador residente de la ONU en el país, precisó que once empleados locales fueron liberados después de ser interrogados en operativos previos. El grupo capturado sigue bajo custodia rebelde, en el marco de una serie de allanamientos y detenciones que han afectado al personal de agencias internacionales en las zonas controladas por los hutíes en los últimos meses.

Durante el operativo, fuerzas hutíes confiscaron dispositivos electrónicos de los empleados y ocuparon el recinto. Los rebeldes justificaron los arrestos argumentando que algunos trabajadores, incluidos los de UNICEF y el Programa Mundial de Alimentos, estarían involucrados en actividades de espionaje en favor de Estados Unidos e Israel. El líder rebelde Abdelmalek al Huthi aseguró que se “desmanteló una célula de espionaje” utilizando la cobertura de organizaciones humanitarias.

Partidarios de los rebeldes hutíes
Partidarios de los rebeldes hutíes corean consignas durante una protesta semanal contra Estados Unidos e Israel en Saná, Yemen (AP Foto/Osamah Abdulrahman)

La Organización de las Naciones Unidas rechazó estas acusaciones y reclamó la liberación inmediata de sus trabajadores.

El secretario general rechaza categóricamente todas estas acusaciones”, declaró Stéphane Dujarric, portavoz de António Guterres, al subrayar que “ponen en grave peligro la seguridad del personal de la ONU y los trabajadores humanitarios y socavan las operaciones que salvan vidas”. El sábado, Dujarric insistió que los señalamientos de espionaje son “peligrosos e inaceptables”.

Advertisement

La ONU informó que mantiene gestiones ante los hutíes, el gobierno yemení y Estados miembros para lograr la liberación del personal y restablecer el control sobre sus instalaciones en Saná. “La ONU está en contacto con los hutíes, los Estados miembros involucrados y el gobierno yemení para resolver esta grave situación lo antes posible”, declaró Alam.

La cancillería hutí defendió en un comunicado el proceder rebelde y reiteró que no hay inmunidad para quienes consideren “espías y saboteadores”.

Ratificó su postura de actuar “con firmeza y decisión” ante lo que consideren amenazas a la seguridad nacional, mientras que rechazó las demandas de liberación inmediata por parte de Naciones Unidas.

Advertisement
El líder rebelde Abdelmalek al
El líder rebelde Abdelmalek al Huthi aseguró que se “desmanteló una célula de espionaje” utilizando la cobertura de organizaciones humanitarias (AP foto/Osamah Abdulrahman)

Las detenciones se producen en un contexto de amplia preocupación humanitaria para Yemen, país envuelto en una guerra civil desde hace una década y considerado por la ONU como escenario de una de las peores crisis de este tipo en el mundo. Desde 2021, al menos 53 empleados y socios de la organización han sido arrestados en regiones bajo poder hutí.

Fuentes cercanas a la operación detallaron que en la última incursión los hutíes interrogaron al personal y reforzaron el control del recinto, mientras la ONU y varios gobiernos mantienen conversaciones diplomáticas para conseguir la liberación de todos los detenidos y la devolución del material incautado.

Agencias como UNICEF y el Programa Mundial de Alimentos lideran en Yemen los programas de nutrición, acceso al agua potable y protección a la infancia, que prestan ayuda diaria a millones de personas. La detención de su principal representante, Peter Hawkins, junto al resto de los funcionarios, compromete de forma crítica la continuidad de operaciones humanitarias esenciales.

Los hutíes acusan a personal
Los hutíes acusan a personal de la ONU en Yemen de ayudar a Israel en sus ataques contra altos cargos

El conflicto en Yemen, con una década de hostilidades y bloqueo, encara ahora un nuevo desafío: la protección y la libertad de acción del personal internacional en medio de restricciones y crecientes amenazas para quienes proporcionan ayuda humanitaria en una de las regiones más vulnerables del planeta.

(Con información de EFE y AFP)

Advertisement

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

‘Untold damage’: Global assisted suicide movement targets children

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

In the spring of 2022, Canadian teenager Markus Schouten’s dying wish was that no child should be forced to choose between life and death.

Advertisement

Markus had just learned he was about to die. His oncologist broke the news to him and his family on the eighth floor cancer ward at British Columbia Children’s Hospital in Vancouver, Canada. They held each other, weeping.

Weeks later, lying on his family’s living room sofa, Markus dictated a letter to the Canadian Parliament’s Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying, established to set guidelines on a federal law that allowed «assisted suicide» in Canada in 2016.

Markus opposed lobbying efforts to expand the law to children under the age of 18.

Advertisement

‘LOVE YOU FOREVER’ AUTHOR MAY SOON DIE BY ASSISTED SUICIDE, PRO-LIFE GROUPS CALL DECISION ‘HEARTBREAKING’

Markus Schouten with his nephew, Mateo, around August 2021 in Chilliwack, British Columbia. (Schouten family)

«That’s because life is worth living and we should always work to alleviate suffering without eliminating the sufferer,» read the final letter, which was signed by his parents.

Advertisement

The letter closed, «Life is worth living, even when we are dying.» 

A month later, Markus died, surrounded by his family and friends, telling them, «See you in paradise.» 

Three years later, his parents, Mike and Jennifer Schouten, are carrying the torch for Markus in a mission to block efforts to allow «mature minors» the right to choose to die through assisted suicide. They now work alongside a global network of like-minded advocates, including disability rights groups, who argue the assisted-suicide industry targets vulnerable people who would benefit from assisted living services. Already, in Canada, the law is expected to expand to patients with severe psychiatric disorders, as early as 2027.

Advertisement

But they are up against a powerful, well-funded machine. A Fox Digital investigation reveals the Schoutens and other opponents of euthanasia face a multimillion-dollar global lobby that could be called Assisted Suicide Inc., a sprawling network changing laws worldwide, developing euthanasia services for funeral parlors, selling «suicide pods,» promoting «suicide tourism» and even training «doulas for death.»

«As we continue to expand the euthanasia regime, all the safeguards and windows have gone out the window,» said Mike Schouten. «And it becomes open season for anyone to choose death, including children.»

AUSTRALIAN MOTHER CALLS FOR SOCIAL MEDIA AGE RESTRICTIONS AFTER DAUGHTER’S SUICIDE

Advertisement
Markus Schouten, seated in a hospital bed, is surrounded by a group of friends and family in a sunlit room.

Markus Schouten with his family at Canuck Place Hospice in Vancouver on May 28, 2022. (Schouten family)

What began as a limited effort to provide adults with terminal illnesses the ability to end pain and suffering has now grown into an international industry. According to a database compiled by the Pearl Project, a nonprofit journalism initiative, at least 96 organizations worldwide are now part of this movement. 

The global lobby cloaks assisted suicide in the language of civil rights and human rights, using euphemisms in their names, such as «assisted dying,» «medical assistance in dying,» «dying with dignity,» «choice,» «end of life,» «completed life,» «final exit,» «free exit» and the «right to die.»

These groups have a presence on every continent, but are predominately found in the West, which also faces alarmingly low birth rates. There are 41 groups in Europe; 31 groups in North America, with 25 of them in the United States, four in Canada and two in Mexico; 13 in Oceania, with most in Australia and one in New Zealand; and only five in Asia, two in Africa, and three in South America.

Advertisement

While most of their work has focused on adults, with Robert Munsch, the Canadian author of the best-selling children’s book, «Love You Forever,» the latest high-profile person to recently announce he was approved for assisted suicide after being diagnosed with dementia. «Hello, Doc — come kill me!» he joked, sharing the news.

The boundaries are shifting. Behind the push to extend these laws to children lies a legal Trojan horse: the «mature minor doctrine.»

This concept, first established in a 1967 Washington Supreme Court case, Smith v. Seiblyonce allowed limited medical discretion for minors. But over decades, it has metastasized into a sweeping jurisdiction for granting children autonomy – and secrecy – over their medical decisions. Today, it lets minors make choices without parental involvement on gender pronouns, gender transitions, contraception and abortion. In 13 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, minors can even obtain abortions without parental knowledge.

Advertisement

FEDERAL COURT REJECTS CHALLENGE TO OKLAHOMA LAW BANNING GENDER TRANSITION TREATMENT FOR MINORS

Markus Schouten poses outdoors in a snowy landscape with three other men, all wearing winter clothing and smiling for the camera.

(Left to Right) Brothers Kayden Schouten, Markus Schouten, Micah Schouten and Aaron Schouten in December 2021. (Schouten family)

Now, advocates are leveraging that same doctrine to argue that children should have the «medical autonomy» to choose death. The «National Youth Rights Association,» a 501(c)(3) nonprofit based in Hyattsville, Md., uses the «mature minors» to die by physician-assisted suicide.

Euthanasia is already legal for adults in Australia, Belgium, Colombia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain and 11 U.S. states. But three countries – the Netherlands, Belgium and Colombia – have gone further, allowing «mature minors» to die by physician-assisted suicide.

Advertisement

In February 2023, despite the pleas of Marcus and his parents, Canada’s Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying recommended extending the right to some youth, declaring that parents should be «consulted» but that the «will of a minor» with decision-making capacity «ultimately takes priority.»

The same debate has now reached the United Kingdom, where a bill to allow adult euthanasia is moving through the British Parliament. Earlier this year, the British House of Commons narrowly voted 259 to 216 to bar physicians from discussing assisted suicide with youth, meaning nearly half of lawmakers supported discussing assisted suicide for youth.

Katharine Birbalsingh, a British educator known as «Britain’s Strictest Headmistress,» believes it’s only a matter of time before youth are included.

Advertisement

«Assisted suicide will spread, full stop,» she told Fox Digital. «And the people allowed to do assisted suicide will grow, making it younger and younger.»

Birbalsingh argues that Western societies have fallen for the dangerous illusion that «the child must lead,» leading to thinking such as «Oh, he wants to change his gender, or he wants to commit suicide.»

«Once upon a time,» she said, «adults used to say, ‘No, the child is not capable of leading, because he is a child.‘ In the West, we have forgotten that we’re meant to be in charge as adults.»

Advertisement

«There ‘s just a million reasons why young people would want to choose death,» said Birbalsingh, the founder of the Michaela Community School in London. «You know, young people are compulsive, they make whimsical decisions. They make irresponsible decisions. They’re young. That’s sort of the definition of a child.»

«That’s why they need looking after,» Birbalsingh added. «That’s why we need to look after them as adults. That’s our job. It’s our role in life, to keep and protect them, sometimes from themselves. The people making these decisions just don’t understand young people.» Lawmakers there was a «very real risk» that proposed assisted suicide legislation, called the «Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill,» would be expanded to include children if they didn’t vote for her amendment.

ITALIAN LAW WOULD REGULATE GENDER TRANSITION TREATMENT FOR MINORS

Advertisement
Markus Schouten lies on a gray sectional couch under a blue-and-white blanket near two women

Markus Schouten, with sister Kaitlyn Jongs, on May 16, 2022, in Royston, British Columbia. (Schouten family)

British Labour Party MP Meg Hillier voiced similar concerns during parliamentary debate, warning that teen brains make them particularly «susceptible to being influenced, including into dangerous and risky behavior.»

She said, «In a number of countries, assisted dying laws have been expanded to allow children and young people to end their lives. We need to be alert to that very real risk.»

Another MP, Sorcha Eastwood, cited social media’s toll on youth brain health, saying, «If we throw this into the mix, it has the potential to do untold damage.»

Advertisement

So far, pro-euthanasia groups in the U.S. have remained quiet about extending assisted suicide to minors, but critics fear it’s only a matter of time.

The British Children’s Commissioner, Dame Rachel de Souza, warned that the proposed changes would allow doctors to discuss assisted dying with 17-year-olds «deemed competent,» preparing them for the choice upon turning 18. In a May report, she said that she had convened a panel of youth to discuss the issue.

In Canada, the euphemism «MAID,» or «Medical Assistance In Dying,» has softened the conversation. But the statistics are stark. In 2023, about 15,000 Canadians died through «MAID,» about one in every 20 deaths nationwide, a 16% increase from 2022, making assisted suicide the fifth leading cause of death. 

Advertisement

The movement is also big business. Dying with Dignity Canada, based in Toronto, reported $3 billion in expenses in 2024, including $803,555 for advertising and promotions. It publicly argues that «mature minors should be allowed the right to choose MAID,» calling it «unfair» to deny a 17-year-old what a 70-year-old is granted.

The British Columbia Humanist Association, the Canada chapter of Humanists International Inc., a 501(c)(3) nonprofit based in New York City, likewise demands MAID access for «mature minors» and «those whose sole underlying condition is a mental illness,» It insisting there is «no moral or ethical distinction between a mature minor and a young adult.» It argues: «Ensure Dignity in Death.» The «high priestess» of euthanisia, Dr. Ellen Wiebe, also supports extending assisted suicide to children. 

The Netherlands offers a preview of what comes next. Legal since 2002, Dutch euthanasia laws permit doctors to end lives of children as young as one, including newborns «suffering unbearably with no prospects of improvement.» 

Advertisement

By 2024, euthanasia accounted for 9,958 deaths in 2024, or 5.8% of the country’s deaths.

DEMOCRATIC STATES SUE TRUMP ADMIN OVER ENDING SEX CHANGE SURGERIES FOR MINORS

A recent study published in the International Journal of Psychiatry found that among Dutch euthanasia applicants, 73% were young women with psychiatric diagnoses including major depression, autism, eating disorder, trauma-related disorders and a «history of suicidality.» The researchers acknowledged there is an «urgent need» to study «persistent death wishes» in this «high-risk group.»

Advertisement

In one chilling case, a boy with autism, aged 16 to 18, ended his life after describing it as «joyless» and «lonely,» according to the 2024 annual report of the Regional Euthanasia Review Committees, which approves medical-assisted suicides. His doctor «had no doubt about his decisional competence.»

Last year, 14 Dutch psychiatrists urged prosecutors to investigate a case involving a 17-year-old girl, Milou, who died by euthanasia after years of depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation, following childhood sexual abuse. They warned against the «widespread promotion of euthanasia» leading to «unnecessary deaths.» The Royal Dutch Medical Association scolded the psychiatrists, and prosecutors declined to act.

In 2014, Belgium became the second country in the world to allow child euthanasia, requiring parental consent.The Belgian Federal Euthanasia Review and Evaluation Committee says that six youth have requested euthanasia between 2014 and 2024. Last year, one young person made the request. 

Advertisement

The industry has faced allegedly criminal revelations. In Australia, one alleged «euthanasia ring kingpin,» Brett Daniel Taylor, faces prison for selling vulnerable people lethal veterinary drugs nicknamed «the Green Dream.»

Back in Canada, Mike and Jennifer Schouten remain committed to fulfilling their son’s wish. 

Michael remembers Markus lying on the sofa, dictating the words that became his son’s final message to lawmakers.

Advertisement

One day, in his final days, Markus said to his parents, «I can see what you are doing with your work is connected to what we’re going through. If we can share our story, we should.»

Now, Michael says, «I feel he is blessing our work.»

This story discusses suicide. If you or someone you know is having thoughts of suicide, please contact the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or 1-800-273-TALK (8255).

Advertisement



world,canada,politics,lobbying,health care,health care healthy living

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Boston eyes city-run groceries to fight food insecurity, but skeptics remain doubtful

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Boston officials are weighing whether the city should open government-owned grocery stores to make fresh, affordable food more accessible — an idea that’s gaining traction in New York City.

Advertisement

After holding a hearing earlier this month, city councilors agreed to study how other cities have implemented municipal markets to close gaps in food access.

Councilors Ruthzee Louijeune and Liz Breadon, who called for the hearing, did not respond to multiple requests for comment from Fox News Digital.

ATLANTA’S CITY-RUN GROCERY SEES EARLY SUCCESS, SPARKING DEBATE OVER GOVERNMENT’S ROLE

Advertisement

While Boston leaders are still exploring the idea, Atlanta has already put the concept into practice, opening its first city-run grocery store earlier this year.

Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens told Fox News Digital that Azalea Fresh Market has served more than 20,000 customers since opening its doors on Aug. 28.

Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens said Azalea Fresh Market has served more than 20,000 shoppers since opening on Aug. 28. (Paras Griffin/Getty Images)

Advertisement

«In its first month, fresh produce made up 11.6% of total sales, exceeding the national average of 10% and highlighting a community demand for healthier food options,» Dickens said, adding that the turnout shows how strong the need was in a neighborhood «long underserved by grocers.»

«Azalea Fresh Market is proof that when we work together as a city, we can deliver real solutions that change lives,» he added.

The early success in Atlanta comes as similar ideas gain momentum elsewhere, including in New York City, where Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani has championed city-owned grocery stores as part of his controversial campaign platform.

Advertisement

Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist upstart, has placed affordability at the center of his agenda to lead America’s largest city. He has campaigned on free buses, rent freezes for tenants in rent-stabilized apartments and city-owned grocery stores.

MAMDANI’S PUBLIC GROCERY STORES MAY HAVE DEVASTATING EFFECTS ON CITY’S FOOD SUPPLY

Zohran Mamdani

New York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani has placed affordability at the center of his campaign to lead America’s largest city. (Deirdre Heavey/Fox News Digital)

But not everyone is convinced city-run grocery stores are the right solution.

Advertisement

Ryan Bourne, a top economist at the libertarian-leaning Cato Institute think tank, told Fox News Digital that «Boston’s flirtation with city-run supermarkets is a bad idea.»

«Government doesn’t become Costco by proclamation,» he said. «Private stores have specialized knowledge about their sector and a profit incentive that encourages them to be efficient. Without those things, a public grocer would likely run things badly, it would only ‘work’ to deliver low-priced food through extensive permanent subsidies.»

Bourne warned that taxpayer-backed subsidies or tax breaks could turn a public grocery into «a badly targeted, in-kind welfare scheme,» adding that heavier subsidies to cut prices could lead to «in-store queues, empty shelves from shortages, and products being resold on black markets.»

Advertisement

TREASURY’S BESSENT WARNS NYC: NO BAILOUT UNDER MAMDANI – ‘DROP DEAD’

A Kroger supermarket in Atlanta, Georgia

Some critics say that community-based organizations, not governments, are better equipped to help low-income families with their groceries. (Elijah Nouvelage/AFP/Getty Images)

Judge Glock, director of research and a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, told Fox News Digital that «city-run grocery stores, like most city-run businesses, tend to do poorly.» He pointed to a government-backed store in Kansas City that shut down despite a nearly $20 million investment.

«There is little justification for the government competing with for-profit grocery stores,» Glock said, noting that supermarkets already operate on some of the slimmest profit margins of any major business. «Further eroding those profits through subsidized competition would only make it harder for regular grocery stores to provide food for their customers.»

Advertisement

John Peluso, a research associate at the Heritage Foundation’s Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies, told Fox News Digital that government-run grocery stores are «ineffective at reducing the overall price of groceries.»

KELLY LOEFFLER: MAMDANI’S SOCIALIST PLANS THREATEN NYC’S BUSINESS CORE

Milk options at a grocery store

Food prices across the nation are rising due to several factors, including labor shortages and tariffs. (Charly Triballeau/AFP/Getty Images)

«They require taxpayer subsidization to operate at low margins in areas of low profitability — and those costs are ultimately passed on to the taxpayer,» he said.

Advertisement

He added that if cities truly want to improve food access, they could achieve more by easing taxes and regulations for all grocers. «If municipalities reduced or eliminated taxation and regulations for everyone, free-market entrepreneurs would flood into cities like Boston, eliminating the issue at its source,» Peluso added.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Peluso also argued that community-based organizations, not governments, are better equipped to help low-income families.

Advertisement

«Government grocery stores are much less efficient at helping the poor than food pantries or other local nonprofits,» he said, calling the city-run model «a kind of Soviet-style market meddling.»

boston,zohran mamdani,new york city,inflation

Continue Reading

Tendencias