Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Iran pushes for fast trials and executions of suspects detained in protests despite Trump’s warning: report

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Despite President Donald Trump’s warnings, Iran’s chief justice called for fast trials and executions of suspects detained in the ongoing anti-government demonstrations, a report said Wednesday. 

Advertisement

The remarks from Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei come as the death toll in the protests has risen to at least 2,571, the U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency said. Other reports say the death toll is more than 3,000, with the real number likely to be even higher. 

«If we want to do a job, we should do it now. If we want to do something, we have to do it quickly,» Mohseni-Ejei said in a video shared by Iranian state television, according to The Associated Press. «If it becomes late, two months, three months later, it doesn’t have the same effect. If we want to do something, we have to do that fast.» 

Trump warned Iran about executions in an interview with CBS News that aired on Tuesday.

Advertisement

SOME US MILITARY PERSONNEL TOLD TO LEAVE MIDDLE EAST BASES, US OFFICIAL CONFIRMS

President Donald Trump, left, and Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei, the chief justice of Iran, right. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images; Mohammadali Najib/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

«We will take very strong action,» Trump said. «If they do such a thing, we will take very strong action.» 

Advertisement

«We don’t want to see what’s happening in Iran happen. And you know, if they want to have protests, that’s one thing, when they start killing thousands of people, and now you’re telling me about hanging — we’ll see how that works out for them. It’s not going to work out good,» the president added. 

IRANIAN REGIME TARGETING STARLINK USERS IN BID TO SQUASH LEAKING PROTEST FOOTAGE

Iranians attend an anti-government protest in Tehran, Iran, on Jan. 9, 2026.

Iranians attend an anti-government protest in Tehran, Iran, on Jan. 9, 2026. (UGC via AP)

Trump also vowed on Tuesday that those responsible for killing anti-regime demonstrators will «pay a big price.» 

Advertisement

«Iranian Patriots, KEEP PROTESTING — TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS!» Trump wrote on Truth Social. «Save the names of the killers and abusers. They will pay a big price.»

Protesters in Iran

People gather on Jan. 8, 2026, in Tehran, Iran.  (Anonymous/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

«I have canceled all meetings with Iranian Officials until the senseless killing of protesters STOPS. HELP IS ON ITS WAY,» he added. 

Advertisement

Fox News’ Anders Hagstrom and The Associated Press contributed to this report. 



iran,donald trump,conflicts,middle east,world protests,politics,world

INTERNACIONAL

Poll position: Where Trump stands among Americans as he faces the nation in primetime

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump goes before the nation in prime time on Wednesday evening to deliver what the White House says is «an important update» on the war with Iran.

Advertisement

The president’s address comes amid the month-long attacks by the U.S. and Israel on Iran, which polls indicate are unpopular with many Americans, and a surge in gas prices as a direct result of the fighting have triggered a further slide in Trump’s standing in public opinion surveys.

The political implications are clear: The strikes on Iran and the erosion of the president’s approval ratings are warning signs for the GOP as Republicans ramp up to defend their slim House and Senate majorities in this autumn’s midterm elections.

Trump stood at 41% approval and 59% disapproval in the latest Fox News national poll, which was conducted March 20–23. The president’s negative 18-point margin was up from 14 points in the previous Fox News poll, which was conducted Feb. 28–March 2, as the strikes against Iran began.

Advertisement

FOX NEWS LIVE UPDATES ON THE U.S. WAR WITH IRAN

The president’s approval ratings stood in the upper 30s, with his disapproval in the upper 50s to low 60s, in the most recent national surveys from Reuters/Ipsos, AP/NORC, and Quinnipiac University. A CNN poll conducted March 26–30 and released Wednesday indicated Trump had a 35%-64% approval/disapproval rating.

An average of the most recent national surveys gauging the president’s standing puts Trump just above 40%, with his disapproval in the upper 50s.

Advertisement

WHAT THE LATEST FOX NEWS POLL SHOWS ON THE WAR WITH IRAN

While Trump’s base remains extremely supportive of the president and the war, much of the slippage is coming from within the GOP, specifically those who are considered non-MAGA Republicans.

«I do see in the last couple of surveys an edging down…close to a double-digit movement,» veteran Republican pollster Daron Shaw, who helps run the Fox News Poll with Democrat Chris Anderson, said, pointing to declining support for Trump among non-MAGA Republicans.

Advertisement

A screen grab from a video released on U.S. President Donald Trump’s Truth Social account shows Donald Trump making statements regarding combat operations on Iran on Feb. 28, 2026, in Palm Beach, Florida. (US President Trump Via Truth Social/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Fueling Trump’s decline appears to be the surge in gas prices.

The average price of gasoline in the U.S. topped $4 per gallon on Tuesday, according to national averages from AAA and GasBuddy, for the first time in four years.

Advertisement

FOX BUSINESS: GAS PRICES TOP $4 PER GALLON

The military attacks by the U.S. and Israel have resulted in the deaths of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other top officials, and the decimation of the country’s military.

In response, Iran has targeted energy facilities with missile and drone attacks in a number of Persian Gulf nations. It has also made the Strait of Hormuz nearly impassable to commercial shipping, bringing roughly 20% of the world’s oil supply to a halt and sending global fuel prices sharply higher.

Advertisement
Rising gas prices at the pumps

A gas station displays a sign for $3.999 for regular gasoline, in Cleveland, Monday, March 30, 2026.  (Sue Ogrocki/AP Photo)

That has only exacerbated Trump’s polling woes when it comes to his performance on the economy, amid public dissatisfaction with high prices and the cost of living.

A spotlight on inflation helped fuel sweeping victories by Trump and Republicans in the 2024 elections, when they won back the White House and Senate and successfully defended their slim House majority.

DEMOCRATS TARGET TRUMP, GOP, OVER SURING GAS PRICES 

Advertisement

But a laser focus on affordability by Democrats, amid persistent inflation, has fueled a slew of victories and overperformances in 2025’s off-year elections and in special elections in the more than 14 months since Trump returned to the White House.

According to the Fox News poll, 80% of respondents said they were concerned about gas prices, and 86% concerned about inflation and high prices. And the CNN survey spotlighted that the president’s approval rating for handling the economy sank to 31%, Trump’s lowest level ever in their polling.

The White House says the surge in prices is temporary.

Advertisement

«When Operation Epic Fury is complete, gas prices will plummet back to the multiyear lows American drivers enjoyed before these short-term disruptions,» White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement on Tuesday.

Leavitt emphasized that «President Trump remains committed to fully unleashing American energy dominance, lowering costs, and putting more money back in the pockets of hardworking American families.»

OIL HAS SURGED SINCE THE IRAN CONFLICT BEGAN, BUT GAS PRICES MAY NOT BE DONE RISING

Advertisement

The gas price surge is giving Democrats more political ammunition to target the GOP.

«BREAKING: National Gas Prices Skyrocket to $4 Per Gallon,» read the headline from an email Tuesday morning from the Democratic National Committee.

The House Democrats’ campaign committee last week launched digital ads showing prices at the pump rising and an image saying «D.C. Republicans Did That!» Sources say to expect another round of ads on gas prices in the coming weeks.

Advertisement

But Democrats have their own polling problems, as the party’s brand image has cratered to historic lows in a slew of polls over the past year.

Shaw, pointing to the so-called double-haters, voters who disapprove of both Trump and the Democrats, said that group hasn’t «really swung dramatically to the Democrats» as the midterms approach.

Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas emphasized in a recent Fox News Digital interview that, in his opinion, Trump’s «decision to launch this military action is the most consequential decision» of his presidency.

Advertisement

Such perceptions only increase what’s at stake when Trump addresses the nation in prime time.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«The American people want to hear what the off-ramp for the war is and when it will end,» Dan Eberhart, an oil drilling chief executive officer and prominent Republican donor told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

Eberhart, who is supportive of the president, said: «Trump’s base is with him, but many ordinary Americans feel the war is unnecessary. Tonight is Trump’s opportunity to explain why this war matters to everyday Americans.»

donald trump, war with iran, iran, polls, midterm elections, inflation, politics

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Ciudadanía por nacimiento: Trump asiste a la Corte para defender su decreto, pero se encuentra con un tribunal en duda

Published

on


La Corte Suprema puso en duda este miércoles las restricciones del presidente Donald Trump a la ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento en un caso trascendental que cobró mayor relevancia por la presencia sin precedentes de Trump en la sala.

Trump llegó este miércoles, en un hecho inédito, a la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, donde asistió a la audiencia sobre la ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento (que él prohibió con un decreto) convirtiéndose así en el primer presidente en ejercicio en presenciar los argumentos orales ante el máximo tribunal del país.

Advertisement

Los magistrados, tanto conservadores como liberales, cuestionaron si el decreto de Trump, que declara que los hijos nacidos de padres que se encuentran en Estados Unidos de forma ilegal o temporal no son ciudadanos estadounidenses, se ajusta a la Constitución o a la ley federal.

Trump permaneció poco más de una hora en la sala para escuchar los argumentos del principal abogado de la administración republicana ante la Corte Suprema, el procurador general D. John Sauer. El presidente se retiró poco después de que la abogada Cecillia Wang comenzara su presentación en defensa de la ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento en su totalidad.

La agenda oficial del presidente republicano, publicada por la Casa Blanca, incluía desde temprano la visita a la Corte Suprema, donde los magistrados escucharán la apelación de Trump contra el fallo de un tribunal inferior que anuló su orden ejecutiva que limitaba la ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento.

Advertisement

La orden, firmada por Trump el primer día de su segundo mandato, declaraba que los hijos nacidos de padres que se encuentran en Estados Unidos de forma ilegal o temporal no son ciudadanos estadounidenses.

Esto representa un giro radical respecto a la postura tradicional de que la Decimocuarta Enmienda de la Constitución y la legislación federal desde 1940 otorgan la ciudadanía a toda persona nacida en territorio estadounidense, con contadas excepciones.

La orden de ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento, firmada por Trump el 20 de enero de 2025, forma parte de la amplia campaña de represión migratoria de su administración republicana.

Advertisement

Todos los tribunales inferiores que han examinado el asunto han declarado ilegal la orden y han impedido su entrada en vigor. Se espera un fallo definitivo del Tribunal Supremo a principios del verano (boreal).

En un posteo en redes sociales Trump protestó: «La ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento tiene que ver con los hijos de esclavos, no con multimillonarios chinos que tienen 56 hijos, todos los cuales se convierten en ciudadanos estadounidenses. ¡Una de las muchas grandes estafas de nuestro tiempo!».

Trump opina sobre la ciudadanía por nacimiento. Foto: @realDonaldTrump

«Voy a ir»

No es la primera vez que Trump considera asistir a una audiencia ante la Corte Suprema. El año pasado, Trump expresó su gran interés en asistir a una audiencia sobre si había excedido la ley federal con sus aranceles generalizados, pero finalmente desistió, argumentando que habría sido una distracción.

Advertisement
Un manifestante protesta frente a la Corte este miércoles. Foto: Reuters

“Voy a ir”, dijo Trump cuando se mencionaron los próximos argumentos en el caso de la ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento. Ante una pregunta posterior para aclarar si planeaba asistir en persona, Trump respondió: “Creo que sí, lo creo”.

Trump acudió a la Corte Suprema durante su primer mandato para la ceremonia de juramento del primer juez que nombró, Neil Gorsuch. Otros dos jueces que nombró —Brett Kavanaugh y Amy Coney Barrett— también forman parte de la Corte.

Otros presidentes han tratado directamente con la Corte, pero no parecen haberlo hecho durante su mandato. Richard Nixon argumentó un caso entre su vicepresidencia y su presidencia, y William Howard Taft fue presidente de la Corte Suprema tras su presidencia.

Claves: ¿Qué está en juego?

Advertisement

El caso: la primera frase de la 14.ª Enmienda, la Cláusula de Ciudadanía, otorga la ciudadanía a “todas las personas nacidas o naturalizadas en los Estados Unidos y sujetas a su jurisdicción”, lo que, según la interpretación tradicional, incluye a los hijos de madres que se encuentran ilegalmente en el país. El caso gira en torno al significado de la última frase sobre la jurisdicción.

Manifestantes a favor y en contra del decreto de Trump. Foto: AP

El argumento: la postura de Trump, respaldada por algunos juristas conservadores, es que las personas que se encuentran ilegalmente o temporalmente en el país no están “sujetas a la jurisdicción” de los Estados Unidos y, por lo tanto, sus hijos nacidos en EE.UU. no tienen derecho a la ciudadanía.

Las implicaciones: más de 250 000 bebés nacidos cada año en EE.UU. se verían afectados por la orden ejecutiva. Esto concuerda con otras políticas antiinmigratorias de la administración Trump: el aumento de las deportaciones, la drástica reducción del número de refugiados admitidos en EE.UU. y la suspensión del asilo en la frontera.

Las restricciones al derecho de nacimiento también se aplicarían a las personas que se encuentran legalmente en EE.UU., incluidos estudiantes y solicitantes de residencia permanente.

Advertisement

Un poco de historia: el caso de Wong Kim Ark

La decisión de la Coarte era un desafío a toda la jurisprudencia en vigor desde finales del siglo XIX, cuando un hombre llamado Wong Kim Ark, nacido en San Francisco en 1873, hijo de padres que habían llegado a Estados Unidos procedentes de China, quiso volver al país tras un viaje a la tierra de sus padres, en 1895.

Su entrada fue denegada por la policía fronteriza en virtud de un Ley de Exclusión China, para frenar la inmigración de ese país.

Advertisement
Un manifestante a favor de la 14° Enmienda de la Constitución. Foto: Reuters

Wong Kim Ark apeló a la 14ª enmienda de la Constitución estadounidense.

La Corte Suprema le dio la razón y recordó que esa enmienda, aprobada tras la traumática Guerra Civil de 1861-65, sirvió para confirmar que los millones de esclavos de origen africano liberados, así como sus descendientes, tenían derecho a la ciudadanía.

Durante más de un siglo, Estados Unidos ha aplicado esta regla de manera amplia, a todos los nacidos en su suelo o en territorios bajo su jurisdicción.

Pero el flujo constante de inmigrantes indocumentados en las últimas décadas ha llevado a algunos juristas conservadores a exigir una revisión de ese derecho.

Advertisement

Los hijos de diplomáticos por ejemplo no tienen derecho automático a la ciudadanía estadounidense, ni tampoco los miembros de tribus nativas soberanas.

Con información de Associated Press y AFP

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Iran’s ceasefire push may be a ‘cycle of deception,’ analysts warn as shadowy figure gains power

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump suggested Wednesday that Iran may be seeking a ceasefire, but analysts say real power lies with hardline figures inside the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, including newly prominent commander Ahmad Vahidi.

Advertisement

Trump did not name the Iranian figure he was referring to, but his comment likely pointed to President Masoud Pezeshkian, writing: «Iran’s New Regime President, much less Radicalized and far more intelligent than his predecessors, has just asked the United States of America for a CEASEFIRE! We will consider when Hormuz Strait is open, free, and clear. Until then, we are blasting Iran into oblivion or, as they say, back to the Stone Ages!!!»

Experts caution, however, that Iran’s president does not control decisions of war and peace.  

«He clearly does not have the authority to turn on or turn off a major military conflict with the United States,» Behnam Ben Taleblu, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

TRUMP’S IRAN STRATEGY SHOWCASES ‘DOCTRINE OF UNPREDICTABILITY’ AMID STRIKE THREATS AND SUDDEN PAUSE

Iranian Interior Minister Ahmad Vahidi speaks during a press conference after the parliamentary elections in Tehran, Iran, March 4, 2024.  (Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters)

Instead, analysts say real power lies with senior figures tied to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, including Vahidi, parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, and security official Mohammad Zolghadr, all of whom operate within overlapping centers of influence.

Advertisement

Attention is turning to the new terror chief seen as an extremist pulling strings, Vahidi — a longtime Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander whose reemergence highlights a broader shift underway inside Iran’s leadership.

Beni Sabti, an Iran expert at the Israeli Institute for National Security Studies, warned that even when Iran signals interest in a «ceasefire,» it may not reflect a Western understanding of the term. 

He pointed to the concept of «hudna,» describing it as «a ceasefire with deception — they stop when they are weak, rebuild their strength, and then attack again, whether against Israel or the United States.» 

Advertisement

Sabti added that such pauses can become «a cycle of violence that does not end,» driven by ideological motivations, and should not be interpreted as a genuine end to hostilities.

Ahmad Vahidi, commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard

Ahmad Vahidi, commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds Force, Esmail Qaani, and Iraj Masjedi, Deputy Coordinator of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Quds Force, participate in a ceremony to mark the memory of former IRGC commander, Hossein Salami, who is killed in Israeli attacks, at a mosque in an IRGC organizational house complex in Tehran, Iran, on July 25, 2025.  (Morteza Nikoubazl/Nur Photo via Getty Images)

From covert operations to global attacks

At the center of that uncertainty is Ahmad Vahidi, the new Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commander. 

«He is a very violent man and belongs to a generation that fought in guerrilla warfare,» Sabti told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

Sabti described Vahidi as part of an early cadre of Iranian operatives who built ties with militant groups in Lebanon before and after the 1979 revolution, relationships that later became central to Iran’s regional strategy. Some accounts suggest Vahidi trained in camps linked to Palestinian and Lebanese factions in southern Lebanon, helping lay the groundwork for Iran’s long-standing alliance with Lebanon-based terror group Hezbollah. 

DESTROY THE REGIME’S POWER WITHOUT OCCUPYING IRAN: A SMARTER WAR PLAN

Ghalibaf and IRGC

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf looks on as parliament members chant in support of the IRGC while wearing military uniforms in Tehran, Iran, Feb 1, 2026.  (Hamed Malekpour/Islamic consultative assembly news agency/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via Reuters)

Vahidi rose through the ranks of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and went on to serve as commander of its elite Quds Force in the 1990s, a unit responsible for overseas operations.

Advertisement

He has been linked to some of the deadliest attacks attributed to Iranian-backed networks abroad, including the 1992 bombing of the Israeli Embassy in Argentina and the 1994 bombing of the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires.

Sabti said Vahidi was also accused of maintaining connections with al Qaeda figures following the Sept. 11 attacks, reflecting what he described as Iran’s willingness to cooperate with groups targeting Western and Israeli interests.

Despite later holding positions that appeared political or bureaucratic, Sabti said Vahidi never truly stepped away from the Revolutionary Guards, Iran’s powerful military and intelligence arm, meaning his role remained closely tied to the regime’s security and operational apparatus.

Advertisement

«He always remained part of the Revolutionary Guards — even wearing uniform,» he said. «That’s common in Iran. Even when they move into politics, they stay within the force.»

Sabti also pointed to Vahidi’s alleged role in suppressing Kurdish uprisings in northwestern Iran in the aftermath of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, underscoring his longstanding involvement in internal security operations. 

HEGSETH REVEALS COVERT VISIT TO TROOPS FIGHTING IN OPERATION EPIC FURY

Advertisement
Composite showing Iranian leaders named in $10 million U.S. reward program tied to IRGC

A composite image shows several Iranian leaders named in the State Department’s Rewards for Justice program offering up to $10 million for information on key figures tied to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), including Mojtaba Khamenei, top left. (State Department / Rewards for Justice; Khoshiran / Middle East Images / AFP via Getty Images)

A system driven by power, not position

Vahidi’s renewed prominence comes as Iran’s internal structure appears increasingly fragmented, with authority concentrated in overlapping and sometimes competing networks.

«It’s not clear how coordinated either the military or political actions of the government of the Islamic Republic is today,» Ben Taleblu said.

He described Iran as «a system of men, not a system of laws,» where personal ties and informal influence often outweigh formal titles.

Advertisement

That dynamic has intensified as the war continues. 

«We are seeing the IRGC ascendancy… across a host of Iranian political and security institutions,» he said.

«This IRGC ascendancy will mean a more crass Islamic Republic, but it comes at a time when this regime is militarily less capable than ever before,» he added.

Advertisement

More power, less restraint

Sabti said Vahidi may now be more influential than other prominent figures in Tehran, including parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s son, Mojtaba Khamenei.

«In my view, he is more dominant right now, even if they are coordinated. This is not a time for internal competition,» Sabti said.

He warned that Vahidi’s rise could further harden Iran’s posture.

Advertisement

«He brings even more radicalization into the system and may not want to stop the war, because it serves the interests of the Revolutionary Guards to continue,» Sabti said.

«They could become masters of the region if the United States folds — and that is very much in his interest.»

Trump’s suggestion that Iran is seeking a ceasefire has raised hopes of a potential diplomatic opening, but experts caution that such signals may not reflect a unified position inside Iran. 

Advertisement

«The question is what was shared with President Trump genuine, or is it wheeling and dealing of just one ambitious person?» Ben Taleblu said.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian

Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a press conference in Tehran, Iran, Sep. 16, 2024.  (WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Majid Asgaripour via Reuters)

«Pezeshkian clearly does not have the authority to turn on or turn off a major military conflict with the United States,» Ben Taleblu said.

Advertisement

That leaves open the possibility that any outreach could be tactical, fragmented, or even contradictory.

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment but did not receive a response in time for publication.

Advertisement



war with iran, donald trump, mojtaba khamenei, terrorism

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias