Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Is the alleged MS-13 gang member going to be returning to the US?

Published

on


A Maryland federal judge on Friday told the Trump administration to comply with a Supreme Court order «in good faith» regarding the ordered return of an alleged MS-13 gang member erroneously deported to El Salvador. 

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national and Maryland resident, was deported to El Salvador last month for being an alleged MS-13 gang member. His attorneys have maintained that he does not have any ties to the violent gang. 

Advertisement

In a Friday hearing, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis ordered the government to provide daily updates as they comply with Thursday’s Supreme Court order upholding her previous order to return Abrego Garcia to U.S. soil. 

FEDERAL JUDGE HAMMERS DOJ ON WHEREABOUTS OF ALLEGED MS-13 GANG MEMBER FOLLOWING SCOTUS ORDER

«I hope you will, in good faith, comply and we’ll take it from there,» Xinis said Friday. «I want daily updates until this matter is resolved.»

Advertisement

Deputy Assistant Attorney General Drew Ensign and Xinis made clear during the hearing that they did not agree on their understanding of the high court’s order. 

On Thursday, the Supreme Court wrote that Xinis’ order «properly requires the government to ‘facilitate’ Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador.»

A Maryland federal judge on Friday told the Trump administration to comply with a Supreme Court order «in good faith» regarding the ordered return of an alleged MS-13 gang member, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, erroneously deported to El Salvador.  (Fox News)

Advertisement

The high court also said the «intended scope of the term ‘effectuate’» in Xinis’ order is «unclear, and may exceed the District Court’s authority.»

«For its part, the Government should be prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps,» the Court wrote. 

«It’s going to be very difficult for the parties and for the trial court to understand what the scope is of the Supreme Court’s order once the trial court takes the issue back up,» defense attorney Phil Holloway told Fox News Digital. 

Advertisement

MARYLAND IMMIGRANT WRONGLY DEPORTED TO EL SALVADOR MUST RETURN TO US, SUPREME COURT RULES

Holloway said that the ambiguity in the high court’s order could lead to the case ending up in the justices’ hands again for further clarification. 

«The government is going to say that they are operating in good faith to comply with an order from the Supreme Court that is murky, and they’re trying their best to comply with it,» he said. «At the same time, the president’s trying to exercise his executive authority under Article II, which also the Supreme Court said the lower court must recognize.»

Advertisement
Jennifer Vasquez Sura speaking

Jennifer Vasquez Sura, the wife of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, speaks during a news conference at CASA’s Multicultural Center in Hyattsville, Maryland, on April 4. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Holloway said the government can take various routes as it moves forward, including seeking a reprieve from Xinis’ order and arguing that it is «unduly burdensome, and it hinders the president’s executive authority.»

«I think they may wind up trying to get him out of that prison and sending him to a different location,» Holloway said. «But I think they’re going to fight pretty hard on whether they actually have to bring him back to U.S. soil.»

DOJ ASKS TO DISMISS VIRGINIA CASE AGAINST SALVADORAN ACCUSED MS-13 LEADER SET TO BE DEPORTED

Advertisement

Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University and a Fox News contributor, said that the extent of the district court’s power to order the government to comply with the Supreme Court’s order is also in question. 

«It’s entirely unclear what, if anything, the court can do beyond other than nudge the administration in this direction,» he said. 

Kilmar Abrego Garcia being handled by guards in El Salvador

In a Friday hearing, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis ordered the government to provide daily updates as they comply with a Supreme Court order upholding her previous order to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia to U.S. soil. (U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland via AP)

Heritage Foundation Legal Fellow Hans von Spakovsky specifically pointed to the Supreme Court noting that the district court must give «[d]ue regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs.» 

Advertisement

«So while the government has to act in good faith to use diplomatic efforts to negotiate Garcia’s return and keep the district court informed of its efforts, the district court cannot give the government direct orders on how to accomplish this foreign policy task or penalize the government if it is not successful,» von Spakovsky said.

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«The assumption is that if the court determines that the administration is acting in bad faith, it could take some other action,» Turley noted. «The question is, how do you make that determination?» 

Advertisement

Turley said the district court could hold the government in contempt if it determines the administration acted in bad faith. However, enforcement may be challenging, given Abrego Garcia is overseas and the president’s Article II authority over foreign affairs.

Immigration,Politics,Law,Justice Department

INTERNACIONAL

Trump and Putin’s relationship turns sour as president pushes for resolution with Ukraine

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

While President Donald Trump previously refrained from speaking ill of Russian President Vladimir Putin, those days are over. 

Advertisement

The ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine has changed the nature of their dynamic. Although the two appeared to get along, at least publicly, during Trump’s first administration, their relationship has unraveled as the more recent conflict persists. 

In recent weeks, Trump has refused to mince his words when asked about Putin. Trump said during a Cabinet meeting July 8 he was fed up with Putin and said he was eyeing potentially imposing new sanctions on Russia. 

«We get a lot of bulls— thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,» Trump said. «He’s very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.» 

Advertisement

TRUMP MOVES NUCLEAR SUBMARINES WEEKS AFTER PRAISING SUB’S POWER IN IRAN STRIKES

While President Donald Trump previously refrained from speaking ill of Russian President Vladimir Putin, those days are over.  (Kremlin Press Office / Handout/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images)

John Hardie, Russia program deputy director at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said Russia started to attract ire from Trump dating back to March after Ukraine agreed to a 30-day ceasefire. But Russia has failed to get on board with a ceasefire. 

Advertisement

«Really, since then, I think Trump has come to view the Russians as the main impediment to a deal,» Hardie told Fox News Digital Thursday. 

Additionally, Hardie said that Trump has also grown frustrated that Russia will launch drone and missile attacks against Ukraine, even after directly speaking with Putin. 

«What he’s sort of latched on to are these Russian drone and missile barrages,» Hardie said. «That really seems to resonate with him.»  

Advertisement

Tensions only have continued to escalate between the U.S. and Russia since the July Cabinet meeting. 

Trump announced July 14 that he would sign off on «severe tariffs» against Russia if Moscow failed to agree to a peace deal within 50 days. He then dramatically reduced the deadline to only 10–12 days — which ends Friday. 

The decision to reduce the timeline prompted former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev to caution that «each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war.» 

Advertisement

TRUMP LIFTS VEIL ON US SUBMARINES IN WARNING SHOT TO KREMLIN IN ‘CLEVER’ REPOSITIONING MOVE

Dmitry Medvedev

The decision to reduce the timeline prompted former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev to caution that «each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war.»  (Sputnik/Yekaterina Shtukina/Pool via Reuters/File Photo)

In addition to economic sanctions, Trump responded to Medvedev and issued a rare statement disclosing that two U.S. Navy submarines would be moved in response to escalating threats from Russia. 

«I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that,» Trump said Aug. 1. 

Advertisement

Trump’s disclosure of the submarine presence puts additional pressure on Russia to come to the negotiating table, according to Bryan Clark, a retired submarine officer and director of the Hudson Institute think tank’s Center for Defense Concepts and Technology.

«We have used very sparingly submarines to try to influence adversary behavior before, but this is pretty unusual, to do it against a nuclear-powered adversary like Russia in response to a nuclear threat by Russia,» Clark told Fox News Digital Monday. «So I think this is trying to essentially push back on Russia’s frequent and long-standing threats to use nuclear weapons in part of the Ukraine conflict.»

President Donald Trump's disclosure of the submarine presence puts additional pressure on Russia to come to the negotiating table, according to Bryan Clark, a retired submarine officer. 

President Donald Trump’s disclosure of the submarine presence puts additional pressure on Russia to come to the negotiating table, according to Bryan Clark, a retired submarine officer. 

Momentum is picking up on negotiations though, and U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff met with Putin Wednesday. 

Advertisement

Trump said in a post on Truth Social afterward that «great progress» was made during the meeting. And now, Trump and Putin are expected to meet face to face imminently in an attempt to finally advance negotiations to end the war between Russia and Ukraine. 

Still, Hardie said he is skeptical that the meeting between Putin and Trump will result in meaningful progress. 

«I don’t expect a summit to produce much,» Hardie said. «And I think Putin could try to use the summit to placate Trump and kind of buy more time continues assault on Ukraine, but I think his goal is he’d love to be able to enlist Trump in his effort to impose these harsh terms on Ukraine.» 

Advertisement

Russia has pushed for concessions in a peace deal that include barring Ukraine from joining NATO, preventing foreign peacekeeper troops from deploying to Ukraine after the conflict, and adjusting some of the borders that previously were Ukraine’s.

U.S. President Donald Trump and Russia's President Vladimir Putin talk during the family photo session at the APEC Summit in Danang, Vietnam November 11, 2017. REUTERS/Jorge Silva - RC1B1EDB0E40

It’s unclear if Trump plans to announce any additional economic burdens upon Russia Aug. 8, 2025, in accordance with the deadline that he imposed demanding that Russia signal willingness to end the conflict.  (Jorge Silva/Reuters)

It’s unclear if Trump plans to announce any additional economic burdens upon Russia Friday in accordance with the deadline that he imposed demanding that Russia signal willingness to end the conflict. But according to Trump, the ball is in Putin’s court. 

«It’s going to be up to him,» Trump told reporters Thursday. «We’re going to see what he has to say. It’s going to be up to him. Very disappointed.»

Advertisement

The White House did not disclose any details regarding potential Friday sanctions, but said that Trump wants to meet with Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Putin to resolve the conflict. 

«The Russians expressed their desire to meet with President Trump, and the President is open to this meeting,» White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to Fox News Digital. «President Trump would like to meet with both President Putin and President Zelensky because he wants this brutal war to end. The White House is working through the details of these potential meetings and details will be provided at the appropriate time.»

Advertisement

white house,russia,ukraine,donald trump,vladimir putin

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump to host Armenia, Azerbaijan leaders ahead of peace pledge as White House eyes Nobel Peace Prize

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump will host the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan on Friday as he looks to secure one more peace deal under his belt following fighting that reignited in 2020. 

Advertisement

«I look forward to hosting the President of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev, and the Prime Minister of Armenia, Nikol Pashinyan, at the White House tomorrow for a Historic Peace Summit,» Trump said in a Thursday night social media post.

«President Aliyev AND Prime Minister Pashinyan will join me at the White House for an official Peace Signing Ceremony,» he added. «The United States will also sign Bilateral Agreements with both Countries to pursue Economic opportunities together, so we can fully unlock the potential of the South Caucasus Region.»

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, right, and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan meet in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates, on July 10, 2025. (Azerbaijani Presidency/Handout/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Advertisement

ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN MOVE TOWARD NORMALIZED RELATIONS AS THE FIRST BORDER MARKER IS PLACED

Despite the president’s comments, experts familiar with the ongoing negotiations have told Fox News Digital that the leaders are not expected to sign a formalized peace agreement, but rather a letter of intent following more than a year of negotiations.

However, even as an official peace agreement is not expected to be signed, the meeting is still viewed as a major win for not only regional stability, but for Trump as well. 

Advertisement

«I believe they’ve had a significant position in this whole process,» Matias Perttula, director of Save Armenia, told Fox News Digital. «We just returned from Armenia over the last week [where] we had several government meetings, including with the national security advisor, the president of Armenia and a couple other ministries, and from what we can tell the engagement from the Trump administration has been a lot more robust than the Biden administration.»

An Azeri serviceman stands near trenches at a former Armenian separatists military position in the village of Mukhtar (Muxtar) retaken recently by Azeri troops, during an Azeri government-organized media trip, in Azerbaijan's controlled region of Nagorno-Karabakh, on Oct. 3, 2023.

An Azeri serviceman stands near trenches at a former Armenian separatists military position in the village of Mukhtar (Muxtar) retaken recently by Azeri troops, during an Azeri government-organized media trip, in Azerbaijan’s controlled region of Nagorno-Karabakh, on Oct. 3, 2023. ( EMMANUEL DUNAND/AFP via Getty Images)

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan are each expected to meet with Trump prior to signing a pledge for peace between the two nations, which have been embroiled in, at times, brutal conflict since the late 1980s.

The conflict largely centered around the status of the Nagorno-Karabakh region, a mountainous area in Azerbaijan with a majority-Armenian population, but which declared independence in 1991. 

Advertisement

While Armenia, along with the international community, never formally recognized the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic as an independent state, it became its chief financial and military backer.

The territory assumed a de facto role in Armenia until Azerbaijani forces overwhelmed the republic in a swift campaign in September 2023, prompting mass evacuations of ethnic Armenians before it was then dissolved on Jan. 1, 2024.

This region is expected to remain a major issue in the ongoing negotiations.

Advertisement
Armenian and Azerbaijani conflict remembered

A protester wearing the Armenian national flag stands in front of Russian peacekeepers blocking the road outside Stepanakert, capital of the self-proclaimed Nagorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan, on Dec. 24, 2022. (Photo by DAVIT GHAHRAMANYAN/AFP via Getty Images)

ARMENIA’S PRIME MINISTER URGES SWIFT BORDER AGREEMENT TO AVOID CONFLICT WITH AZERBAIJAN

Though both nations announced in March that they had reached a consensus on finalizing a peace deal, several factors surrounding the mountainous area have prevented a finalized agreement from being reached, as witnessed in the July meeting between the leaders when they met in the UAE but failed to find a resolution.

Chief among Azerbaijan’s demands is that Armenia should amend its constitution and remove all references to the Nagorno-Karabakh territory. Though this demand is not a simple request that just Pashinyan can agree to as it would require a national referendum.

Advertisement

«There’s no legal consequence whatsoever,» Perttula told Fox News Digital, explaining that both Armenian and American legal experts have refuted the demand as inconsequential, and therefore should not serve as a precursor to reaching a formalized peace deal.

«There needs to be a real consideration for the right of return for the 120,000 Armenian Christians that were forced off the lands of Nagorno-Karabakh that has been their ancestral homeland for centuries,» Perttula added. «I think that needs to be a key point in terms of formalizing this whole peace agreement.»

«We want peace at the end of the day,» he added. «We want peace and normalization.»

Advertisement
Memorial of Armenia and Azerbaijan conflict.

Citizens visit their loved ones at Yerablur Military Cemetery who were killed recently during September in Nagorno-Karabakh. (ANTHONY PIZZOFERRATO/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

NETANYAHU SURPRISES TRUMP WITH FORMAL NOBEL PEACE PRIZE NOMINATION DURING HISTORIC WHITE HOUSE MEETING

Trump, while on the campaign trail, highlighted the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict and accused then-Vice President Kamala Harris of doing «NOTHING as 120,000 Armenian Christians were horrifically persecuted and forcibly displaced.» 

Trump said he would «work to stop the violence and ethnic cleansing, and we will restore PEACE between Armenia and Azerbaijan.»

Advertisement

Trump has repeatedly championed his push to end conflict across the globe and in June celebrated a peace agreement that the U.S. helped broker between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda with an Oval Office signing. 

«In a few short months, we’ve now achieved peace between India and Pakistan, India and Iran, and the DRC and Rwanda, and a couple of others, also,» Trump said during the event. 

Trump DR Congo Rwanda Peace Agreement

President Donald Trump holds up a signed document to present to Congo’s Foreign Minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner, right, as Rwanda’s Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe, from left, Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio watch on Friday, June 27, 2025 in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

The president – who has been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as well as leaders from Pakistan and Cambodia – has on several occasions argued his credentials should be recognized under the international award that has been granted to four other U.S. presidents. 

In a February meeting with Netanyahu, Trump said, «They will never give me a Nobel Peace Prize. It’s too bad. I deserve it, but they will never give it to me.» 

The White House last week lobbied for the president to win the award come December when White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, «It’s well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.»

Advertisement



donald trump,asia world regions,world,conflicts

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Alemania suspende la venta de armas a Israel: fuerte condena internacional al plan israelí de tomar ciudad de Gaza

Published

on


Alemania anunció este viernes la suspensión de las exportaciones militares a Israel en respuesta al plan de Benjamin Netanyahu de tomar el control de la ciudad de Gaza.

El gabinete de seguridad israelí aprobó el plan en la madrugada del viernes, lo que suscitó críticas de líderes internacionales, incluyendo a Alemania, aliado de Israel desde hace mucho tiempo y uno de sus mayores proveedores de armas.

Advertisement

Tomar el control de la ciudad de Gaza probablemente sea la primera fase de una toma total del territorio, consideran los analistas y los gazatíes temen el inicio de una etapa de más destrucción y desplazamientos. Ciudad de Gaza es la urbe más grande del territorio.

El canciller alemán, Friedrich Merz, anunció Alemania suspenderá todas las exportaciones de equipamiento militar que pudiera ser utilizado en la Franja de Gaza.

Advertisement

En su intervención ante la cumbre de la OTAN de junio, el canciller Friedrich Merz había dicho que «Nuestra razón de ser es la defensa de la existencia de Israel». Por lo tanto, la decisión ahora de detener las exportaciones de armas militares que podrían utilizarse en Gaza constituye un gran paso.

Alemania es el segundo mayor exportador de armas a Israel, después de Estados Unidos.

El canciller alemán Friedrich Merz anunció la suspensión de venta de armas a Israel. Foto: Reuters

Según Sipri, el Instituto Internacional de Investigación para la Paz de Estocolmo, entre 2020 y 2024 Alemania suministró el 33 % de las importaciones de armas de Israel (después de Estados Unidos, con el 66 %). Se trataba principalmente de equipo naval (fragatas y torpedos), pero también de camiones blindados, armas antitanque y municiones.

Advertisement

Merz también urgió al gobierno israelí a «abstenerse de dar nuevos pasos para anexionar Cisjordania».

Video

Hambre y muerte en Gaza: la vida a cambio de harina «empapada de sangre»

Merz también manifestó una profunda preocupación por la situación humanitaria en Gaza, enfatizando que, con su actual ofensiva, Israel tiene más responsabilidad que nunca de garantizar las necesidades de los civiles del enclave. Pidió a Israel permitir el ingreso total de ayuda, incluidos suministros de Naciones Unidas y otras organizaciones no gubernamentales.

Advertisement

«Siguiendo los pasos positivos adoptados en los últimos días, Israel debe continuar mejorando la situación humanitaria en Gaza de manera integral y sostenible», exhortó Merz.

Ursula Von der Leyen: «Israel debe reconsiderar la medida»

La presidenta de la Comisión Europea, Ursula von der Leyen, pidió este viernes al gobierno israelí que «reconsidere» el plan militar para ocupar la ciudad de Gaza e insistió en la liberación de todos los rehenes y el «acceso inmediato y sin obstáculos» de ayuda humanitaria.

Advertisement
Ursula von der Leyen pidió al gobierno israelí que "reconsidere" el plan militar . Foto: EFEUrsula von der Leyen pidió al gobierno israelí que «reconsidere» el plan militar . Foto: EFE

«La decisión del Gobierno israelí de ampliar aún más su operación militar en Gaza debe reconsiderarse. Al mismo tiempo, deben liberarse a todos los rehenes, que se encuentran retenidos en condiciones inhumanas», dijo la mandataria europea a través de redes sociales.

Condena de Turquía

Turquía ha condenado este viernes «de la forma más enérgica posible» el anunciado plan del gobierno israelí para ocupar enteramente la ciudad de Gaza, en el norte de la Franja, y ha pedido al Consejo de Seguridad de Naciones Unidas una «resolución vinculante» para detener a Israel.

«Condenamos de la forma más enérgica la ampliación de la operación militar en Gaza, que representa una nueva fase de la política israelí expansionista y genocida«, señala un comunicado del Ministerio de Exteriores turco.

Advertisement

El texto pide al Consejo de Seguridad de Naciones Unidas que adopte una «resolución vinculante para prevenir acciones de Israel que vulneren la ley internacional y los valores humanos».

Ciudad de Gaza, en ruinas. Foto: ReuterCiudad de Gaza, en ruinas. Foto: Reuter

También hace un llamamiento a «la responsabilidad de la comunidad internacional» en impedir que se lleve a cabo esta «decisión israelí, cuyo objetivo es expulsar por la fuerza a los palestinos de su tierra y convertir Gaza en un lugar inhabitable».

El comunicado acusa al primer ministro israelí, Benjamin Netanyahu, de llevar a cabo un «genocidio contra los palestinos» y pide un inmediato alto el fuego para iniciar negociaciones que desemboquen en la solución de los dos Estados, es decir un Estado palestino en las fronteras de 1967, vecino a Israel.

El gabinete de seguridad del Gobierno israelí dio luz verde en la madrugada de este viernes a un plan militar para ocupar la ciudad de Gaza, urbe de un millón de habitantes en el norte de la Franja.

Advertisement

En declaraciones a la cadena Fox anteriores a la reunión del gabinete, Netanyahu afirmó que su objetivo era ocupar toda Gaza, pero que no pretende quedársela ni gobernarla, sino mantener un «perímetro de seguridad» y entregarla a «fuerzas árabes que la gobiernen» sin amenazar a Israel y sin Hamas.

Numerosos organismos internacionales, pero también la propia oposición israelí, han condenado este plan.

La ofensiva de Israel sobre Gaza se desató luego de que el 7 de octubre de 2023 Hamas llevo a cabo un brutal ataque a comunidades israelíes, capturando a decenas de rehenes y matando a más de 1000 israelíes.

Advertisement

La guerra en Gaza ya dejó más de 60 mil palestinos muertos, en su mayoría mujeres y niños, y arrastró a la población hacia la hambruna.

Más reacciones: China pide una alto el fuego

El ministro de Asuntos Exteriores neerlandés, Caspar Veldkamp, calificó los planes del gobierno israelí como una medida errónea, afirmando que no contribuirá al regreso de los rehenes.

Advertisement

El Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores chino afirmó que «Gaza pertenece al pueblo palestino y es parte inseparable del territorio palestino» y exigió un alto el fuego inmediato.

«Este es el único medio para allanar el camino para poner fin al conflicto y mantener la seguridad en la región», sostuvo el portavoz del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, Guo Jiakun.

China está dispuesta a trabajar con el resto de la comunidad internacional para detener los combates en Gaza lo antes posible, aliviar el desastre humanitario, implementar la solución de dos Estados y, en última instancia, lograr una solución completa, justa y duradera de la cuestión palestina, manifestó Guo.

Advertisement

Dinamarca afirmó, a su turno, que la decisión de Israel de intensificar su operación militar en Gaza debe revocarse.

Franja de Gaza,Israel

Advertisement
Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias