Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

NATO allies clash after Russian jets breach airspace, testing alliance resolve

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

EXCLUSIVE: Recent Russian incursions into NATO airspace have sharpened divisions inside the alliance over how to respond, exposing both the strength and the limits of collective defense.

Advertisement

Secretary General Mark Rutte clashed with Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal last week after Estonia invoked NATO’s Article 4 clause, which triggers consultations when a member feels its security is threatened.

According to three European officials granted anonymity to speak freely, Rutte argued that repeated invocations risked diluting the treaty’s force. One source said he even raised his voice at Michal, warning that NATO must be cautious about how often it signals alarm.

Rutte argued that if Article 4 were invoked every time Russia violated sovereignty — through drone incursions, fighter jets, cyberattacks and more — it would quickly lose impact, according to the officials.  

Advertisement

DENMARK CONSIDERS TRIGGERING NATO ARTICLE 4 AFTER DRONES FLY OVER AIRPORTS

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in front of NATO and Ukraine flags  (Thomas Peter/Reuters)

A NATO spokesperson confirmed Rutte and Michal spoke Friday and said the secretary general «has supported Estonia throughout the process.»

Advertisement

Rasmus Ruuda, director of the Government Communication Office of Estonia, told Fox News Digital Rutte «expressed support for Estonia and the Prime Minister thanked NATO for its actions.»

«Article 4 is just a signal that we’re taking note of what happened,»  said Giedrimas Jeglinskas, a Lithuanian member of parliament and former NATO assistant secretary general. «We can be invoking Article 4 every week, and I think that only weakens us, because we’re unable to truly respond to that aggression that Russia is sort of throwing at us.»

The tension comes after a series of provocative moves by Moscow. Last month, missile-carrying Russian MiG-29s flew into Estonian territory, following an earlier breach of Polish airspace by 19 drones and repeated incursions over Romania. In Poland, jets scrambled to intercept the drones, shooting some of them down. It marked the first time since World War II that Polish armed forces mobilized to engage an airborne threat over their homeland.

Advertisement

The Russian jets in Estonia were eventually escorted out of its territory by Italian F-35s. Estonia’s Article 4 request followed Poland’s own invocation days earlier, prompting another round of consultations in Brussels.

MIg-29 fighter jet

MiG-29 jet fighters perform during a Victory Day parade in Red Square in Moscow on June 24, 2020. (Sefa Karacan/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

Since its creation in 1949, Article 4 has been triggered only nine times. NATO’s warning to Russia after the Estonian request was blunt: any further breaches would be met with «all means» of defense. Estonia’s defense minister said his nation was prepared to shoot down Russian planes violating airspace «if there is a need.» 

But Jeglinskas said signaling without consequence risks leaving the alliance trapped.

Advertisement

«We’re happy to do Article 4 every other day, but so what? What’s next?» he said. «The real question is what happens when the jets actually enter our airspace.»

The debate cuts to a deeper question: what constitutes a «need» to shoot down Russian jets? How can Russia be deterred without stumbling into direct war?

«The last thing we want is to have NATO get drawn into a war with Russia,» a senior State Department official told Fox News Digital. «God knows how that ends.»

Advertisement

«Almost all wars … they don’t necessarily start with a big bang,» the official went on. «They start with an escalation, and then somebody feels they need to respond to this, and then you just get in a toxic spiral.»

‘PUTIN IS PUSHING THE LIMITS’: EASTERN ALLIES WARN TRUMP NOT TO PULL US TROOPS

The United States has promised to defend «every inch» of NATO while pressing Europe to bear more of its own defense burden. Washington’s mixed signals have only complicated matters.

Advertisement

Trump administration officials long favored reducing the U.S. troop presence in Europe. But President Donald Trump recently delivered one of the starkest warnings to Moscow, declaring that NATO states should shoot Russian aircraft down if they incur on their territory.

Jeglinskas said the statement resonated across the Baltic States. «What was really helpful was that President Trump was very clear,» he said. «That gives us confidence we’re on the right track, and we really appreciate the support.»

Still, allies remain divided on whether to escalate. Some warn that Eastern Europe cannot credibly threaten retaliation without an American security guarantee. Others argue that deterrence depends on showing Russia its incursions carry a cost.

Advertisement

«If we really want to send a proper message of deterrence to Russia, we need to be prepared to use kinetic force,» Jeglinskas said. «That means neutralizing those jets — shooting them down or finding other ways to impose consequences — so Russia actually feels the cost of its incursions. That hasn’t happened yet, and it leaves us vulnerable.»

Estonia's Prime Minister Kristen Michal walks by flags in Denmark

Estonia’s Prime Minister Kristen Michal led his country in invoking Article 4 after Russian jet incursions. (Piroschka van de Wouw/Reuters)

The airspace disputes now extend beyond fighter jets. European Union members are meeting in Copenhagen this week to discuss shoring up air defenses after a wave of drone sightings. Denmark briefly shut down its airspace following mysterious drone activity, while Lithuania’s Vilnius airport and Norway’s Oslo airport also reported disruptions. Drones have even been spotted over Germany’s northern state of Schleswig-Holstein.

«We are not at war, but we are no longer at peace either. We must do much more for our own security,» German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said in Düsseldorf.

Advertisement

NATO jets scrambled to intercept drones over Poland, but the response underscored a growing mismatch: deploying multi-million dollar fighters to counter small, unmanned aircraft is neither efficient nor sustainable.

RUSSIA SHIFTS FROM TALK TO ACTION, TARGETING NATO HOMELAND AMID FEARS OF GLOBAL WAR

«NATO remains the most crucial element of our security equation,» Jeglinskas said. «It’s the backbone through which our security is viewed. There’s really no doubt about NATO’s political will and its capability to defend its territory, but warfare is changing — and the question now is, has NATO adapted to the new way of war that is seeping through the borders of Ukraine?»

Advertisement

Jeglinskas warned that neither NATO nor the Baltic States have done enough. «The Polish incursion signified that NATO is not fully ready to counter these threats,» he said. «Scrambling jets is a tremendous economic mismatch. If these kinds of attacks become swarms, it’s not sustainable.»

A French Rafale fighter jet on runway

A French Rafale fighter jet is seen after landing following a joint mission with Polish F16s at an air base in Minsk Mazowiecki on September 17, 2025, as part of the Eastern Sentry mission (THIBAUD MORITZ/AFP via Getty Images)

To address mounting threats, NATO last month launched Operation Eastern Sentry, reinforcing its presence on Europe’s eastern flank. Jeglinskas welcomed the move but said gaps remain.

«Jets are very important, but more jets don’t mean we’re more secure from low-altitude drones,» he said. «The question is: do we have sensors that can detect what’s happening from the ground up to a kilometer into our airspace? We don’t see that. It’s like a dead space.»

Advertisement

Jeglinskas called for stronger short- and medium-range radar, as well as layered defenses akin to Israel’s Iron Dome, capable of intercepting drones with both kinetic and electronic means.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«NATO’s response is commendable,» he said, «but it’s not enough. You need technical know-how, the right capabilities, and systems that are truly integrated if you want to make this work.»

Advertisement

For now, NATO remains caught between signaling resolve and acting on it. As Russia continues to test the alliance’s borders, Jeglinskas and other Eastern European officials warn that credibility is at stake. The next incursion, they argue, may demand more than words.

nato,russia,the european union,conflicts defense,vladimir putin,world,politics

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Democrats at a big disadvantage in shutdown as Trump starts slashing their programs

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Democrats are taking a big gamble by going along with a government shutdown, one that they will probably lose.

Advertisement

The most important reason is that President Trump has a giant megaphone. Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer simply can’t compete in drawing media attention.

What’s more, while some Americans may blame both sides – can’t they act like adults and work out these budget fights? – the Republicans are blaming the «Democrat Party» for triggering the shutdown.

At yesterday’s White House briefing, itself a key advantage, JD Vance and Karoline Leavitt kept repeating, like a mantra, that the Democrats support «healthcare for illegal aliens.» That is bunk. They aren’t eligible. It’s already against the law, except in emergency situations. But Trump is pounding that message home through sheer repetition.

Advertisement

VANCE BLAMES SCHUMER’S FEAR OF AOC PRIMARY CHALLENGE AS SHUTDOWN CAUSE

Democratic leadership sits at a sizable disadvantage when it comes to government shutdown-related messaging. (J. Scott Applewhite, file/AP Photo)

A Washington Post editorial yesterday says «Democrats just marched into a shutdown trap … Progressives embraced the same disastrous mentality that led the House Freedom Caucus to believe it could come out ahead in previous government funding standoffs: They wrongly assumed their political leverage would withstand the ensuing fallout.»

Advertisement

A few minutes after the briefing, Hakeem Jeffries stepped before the microphones to declare that Republicans don’t want to provide healthcare «to working-class Americans.»

The minority leader said the administration is trying to «jam their extreme right-wing agenda down the throats of the American people … The Republican healthcare crisis is immoral.»

Frankly, it just didn’t sound as forceful or have the same impact.

Advertisement
Vice President JD Vance in dark suit and red tie speaking

Vice President JD Vance suggested Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., is pivoting left for fear of a primary challenge by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. (Alex Brandon, Pool/AP Photo)

Whatever the immediate toll of the shutdown – military people and hundreds of thousands of civilians not getting paid, food stamps on hold – Vance and Leavitt blamed it on Democratic intransigence. (Those laid off will get back pay once the shutdown ends.)

The vice president said Schumer is moving left because he’s terrified of a primary challenge by AOC. She says her only goal is to «stop this madness.»

The president has been more candid, telling reporters: «We can do things during the shutdown that are irreversible, that are bad for them and irreversible by them. Like cutting vast numbers of people out, cutting things that they like, cutting programs that they like.» Now that’s transparency.

Advertisement

The Dems don’t hold the moral high ground when it comes to kick-the-can votes to delay a shutdown, having frequently used the tactic when they were in charge. While Vance says they’d be happy to talk about healthcare during a seven-week delay, the other party feels they would lose whatever leverage they have, and it would be politically humiliating.

The Democrats are making a more complicated argument about healthcare, and that’s a tougher sell for the many millions who don’t follow the news closely.

KFF, which is Kaiser, says those on Obamacare would get socked if tax credits are allowed to expire at year’s end. Average premiums next year would be $888, but without the tax credits, would jump to $1,593 – a 114 percent increase.

Advertisement

That would really cripple the Affordable Care Act and knock millions off the rolls.

SOCIAL SECURITY, AIRPORTS, FOOD STAMPS: HOW ARE YOU AFFECTED DURING A GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?

The Dems’ other objection is to deep cuts in Medicaid, despite Trump’s promise to protect the program. But that’s why we have elections. Having lost the House, Senate and White House, the party can’t expect the GOP to make sweeping changes to its preferred budget.

Advertisement

It just so happens – a coincidence, I’m sure – that the administration yesterday halted $18 billion in funding for two major transportation projects in New York City, expansion of the Second Avenue subway and new train tunnels under the Hudson River.

A shot at Schumer’s hometown? Vance says this is a question of «triage,» saving money on such projects to preserve essential services.

But it’s really a case of Trump going after Democratic priorities, as he said he would, since he preserved funding for one of his pet projects, the mission of returning to the moon, which seems less than vital at the moment.

Advertisement

SUBSCRIBE TO HOWIE’S MEDIA BUZZMETER PODCAST, A RIFF ON THE DAY’S HOTTEST STORIES

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries at a press conference

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., appeared outraged by an AI image of him shared online by the president. (Nathan Posner/Anadolu/Getty Images)

What really got Jeffries mad after Monday’s unsuccessful White House meeting was a fake AI image posted by the president. It depicted him as having a handlebar mustache and wearing a huge sombrero, with mariachi music in the background.

Jeffries called the parody «racist» and demanded that the president «say it to my face.»

Advertisement

The bottom line, given the atmosphere of mutual distrust, is that this government closure could drag on for awhile. That would gradually boost the pain level, and the Democrats are already at a disadvantage.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

At this point the opposition party is trying to show the public that it can fight, and that, beyond the healthcare battle, may be its main message.

Advertisement

media buzz,donald trump,chuck schumer,congress,white house,government shutdown

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

La misteriosa muerte del embajador de Sudáfrica en Francia al caer desde un piso 22: ¿Suicidio o asesinato?

Published

on


El embajador sudafricano en Francia murió ayer al caer de la ventana del piso 22 del Hotel Hyatt Regency, en Porte Maillot, en París. Se cree que Nkosinathi Emmanuel Mthethwa, cuya embajada está frente a la de Argentina en la rue Ciomarosa, aparentemente se suicidó tras forzar la seguridad de la ventana.

Fue encontrado el martes, después de que su esposa llamara a la policía el lunes, tras haber recibido un inquietante mensaje de su marido, quien se había despedido de ella diciendo que iba a un cóctel.

Advertisement

El diplomático de 58 años, ex ministro de Policía y destacado político, al parecer saltó del piso 22 del hotel Hyatt Regency en Porte Maillot, al oeste de la capital, según la fiscalía.

Mthethwa era Embajador de Sudáfrica en Francia, Mónaco y Delegado Permanente ante la UNESCO desde febrero de 2024.

Investigadores policiales informaron a medios franceses que el embajador sufría de depresión y se creía que se había quitado la vida. Había reservado una habitación y una de las ventanas de seguridad fue forzada, según informaron. Las herramientas usadas estaban sobre el piso.

Advertisement

La última conexión telefónica del diplomático fue en la zona del Bois de Boulogne, según informó la policía. La policía con perros registró el distrito por la noche, después de que la esposa de Mthethwa les comunicara que temía que él se autolesionara, según informaron medios franceses.

El cuerpo de Mthethwa fue encontrado el martes por la mañana, tras una búsqueda policial que comenzó después de que su esposa les avisara el lunes por la noche de que había recibido un mensaje preocupante de su esposo. El personal de la embajada informó a la policía que el embajador había estado ausente desde las 3 de la tarde del lunes.

Había sido denunciado por corrupción

Advertisement

El gobierno de Pretoria confirmó la muerte del embajador. En un comunicado, anunció “con profundo pesar el prematuro fallecimiento” de Mthethwa, describiéndolo como “un distinguido servidor de la nación”, que había ocupado diversos cargos ministeriales.

El embajador sudafricano en Francia murió ayer al caer de la ventana del piso 22 del Hotel Hyatt Regency, en Porte Maillot, en París. Foto Reuters

“Las circunstancias de su prematura muerte están siendo investigadas por las autoridades francesas”, añadió el comunicado.

La fiscalía francesa ha abierto una investigación. Un juez de instrucción se dirigió al hotel de 34 pisos, el más alto de París. La torre forma parte del complejo del Palacio de Congresos, en la esquina noreste del Bois de Boulogne, una zona verde colindante con los distritos 16 y 17, donde están las embajadas y consulados.

Advertisement

Mthethwa había sido implicado recientemente en irregularidades, en una investigación judicial sobre presuntos vínculos entre altos cargos políticos y el crimen organizado.

La denuncia

Un jefe de policía regional declaró en la audiencia que en 2011, cuando Mthethwa era ministro de Policía, interfirió deliberadamente en los esfuerzos para perseguir un caso de corrupción contra un colega de alto rango.

Advertisement

El embajador, originario de un municipio cercano a Durban, comenzó su carrera como líder sindical anti apartheid. Sus cargos ministeriales incluían deportes, arte y cultura, así como policía y seguridad.

Mthethwa es uno de los tres exministros de Policía de Sudáfrica vinculados a la interferencia política en investigaciones policiales delicadas, en beneficio de bandas criminales y cárteles de la droga.

Interferencias en investigación

Advertisement

Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, comisionado de policía de la provincia de KwaZulu-Natal, cuyas denuncias de que la policía y el sistema judicial sudafricanos habían sido infiltrados por delincuentes dieron lugar a la apertura de la investigación, testificó que Mthethwa había obligado a un jefe de inteligencia a retirar los cargos en una investigación clave.

«Si hablamos de interferencia política, eso fue lo peor que he vivido«, declaró Mkhwanazi ante la comisión de Mandlanga a principios de este mes, en referencia al caso contra Richard Mdluli, exjefe de inteligencia policial sobre delincuencia.

En julio, Mkhwanazi acusó públicamente al entonces ministro de Policía, Senzo Mchunu, y a otros altos funcionarios de obstruir las investigaciones de los casos, incluyendo asesinatos con motivación política.

Advertisement

Las acusaciones llevaron a Ramaphosa a suspender a Mchunu y a anunciar la comisión de tres miembros, presidida por un exjuez del Tribunal Constitucional, que comenzó a escuchar testimonios este mes.

Mthethwa se desempeñó como ministro de Policía desde 2009, durante el primer mandato de cinco años del expresidente Jacob Zuma, quien ha sido acusado de corrupción. El parlamento sudafricano ha estado investigando por separado las acusaciones de Mkhwanazi.

Sudáfrica tiene una de las tasas de criminalidad más altas del mundo y las acusaciones de corrupción en la policía no son nuevas. Sin embargo, es inusual que altos mandos policiales se acusen mutuamente de estar involucrados con delincuentes.

Advertisement

Durante su declaración inaugural ante la comisión, Mkhwanazi afirmó que mostraría el alcance de la amenaza al sistema de justicia penal del país.

“Mi objetivo ha sido demostrar que el sistema de justicia penal ha estado sujeto a una amenaza continua, así como a sabotaje, durante un período prolongado”, declaró. “Hasta tal punto que creemos que corre un riesgo real de colapso total si no se actúa”, dijo.

Sudáfrica fue también el país que denunció a Israel y al primer ministro israelí por genocidio ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia en La Haya y la razón por la que se ha pedido su captura internacional.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Johnson accuses Schumer of blocking ‘real discussion’ to keep government open

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

EXCLUSIVE: Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., is accusing Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., of refusing to vote to end the government shutdown to kowtow to his left-wing base.

Advertisement

Johnson told Fox News Digital in a sit-down interview that Democrats’ refusal to budge on their current position came up in an hour-long call with President Donald Trump Wednesday afternoon.

«[Trump is] very bothered by that, that Chuck Schumer would do this, Democrats would do this, because we haven’t,» the top House Republican said.

He noted that Democrats had voted on a similar measure to what Republicans are offering on 13 different occasions under former President Joe Biden.

Advertisement

SOCIAL SECURITY, AIRPORTS, FOOD STAMPS: HOW ARE YOU AFFECTED DURING A GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?

House Speaker Mike Johnson, right, is criticizing Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s, left, for refusing to agree to a GOP-led plan to avert a government shutdown. (Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)

«And even when the Republicans were in the minority, we did the right thing to keep the government open. And we fully expected that Schumer would do that again, as he always has, but not this time,» Johnson said.

Advertisement

«This is a selfish political calculation he’s made, that he’s got to prove to the far left that he’s going to fight Trump or something. So, we talked about our frustration with that.»

He said Trump appeared «happy» that Republicans remain unified in their federal funding stance but was concerned about the effects of a prolonged shutdown on everyday Americans.

REPUBLICANS ERUPT OVER SHUTDOWN CHAOS, ACCUSE DEMS OF HOLDING GOVERNMENT ‘HOSTAGE’

Advertisement

«But the reason we’re happy about that is because we know we’re doing the right thing for the American people,» Johnson said. «And Chuck Schumer and the Democrats are demonstrating that they are willing to inflict this pain upon the people for their own political purposes. And I think that is a tough thing for them to get over.»

He said of a meeting between congressional leaders and Trump that occurred Monday: «I tried my best in the White House, and he just is in no mood to have a real discussion about these issues. So, we are where we are.»

Trump saluting

President Donald Trump, right, salutes Air Force Col. Christopher M. Robinson, commander, 89th Airlift Wing, before boarding Marine One upon his arrival at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, Friday, Sept. 26, 2025. (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez)

Senate Democrats have now rejected a GOP-led plan to fund federal agencies through Nov. 21 three times.

Advertisement

The measure is called a continuing resolution (CR) and is aimed at buying House and Senate negotiators more time to reach a deal on fiscal year 2026 federal funding priorities.

The CR would keep current federal funding levels roughly flat while adding an extra $88 million in security spending for lawmakers, the White House and the judicial branch.

Democrats, furious at being largely sidelined in funding discussions, have signaled they would not accept any bill that does not also extend Obamacare tax subsidies that were enhanced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Those enhanced subsidies are due to expire at the end of this year.

Advertisement

But Johnson, who called the Obamacare subsidies an «end-of-year issue,» argued that the bill was a simple extension of federal funding, leaving Republicans with no realistic path for concessions.

John Thune talking to reporters

Sen. Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., speaks with reporters near his office on Capitol Hill Sept. 18, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«If it was not clean and simple, if I had loaded it up with a bunch of Republican partisan priorities, then there would be something for us to negotiate. I could take those things off and offer it again. I sent it over with nothing attached at all,» he said.

Advertisement

«It quite literally is just buying us time to finish the appropriations process, which was being done in a bipartisan manner. So, I don’t have anything to give, there’s nothing I can give. And Chuck Schumer has made such outrageous counter-demands and proposals that he’s the one that has to come to his senses.»

He was referring to Democrats’ counter-proposal for a CR, which would have repealed the Medicaid reforms made in Republicans’ One Big, Beautiful Bill, while restoring funding for NPR and PBS that was cut by the Trump administration earlier this year.

Fox News Digital reached out to Schumer’s office for a response but did not hear back by press time.

Advertisement

house of representatives politics,politics,senate,government shutdown

Continue Reading

Tendencias