INTERNACIONAL
Nuclear watchdog urges ‘trust but verify’ that Iran engages in good-faith negotiations
Much remains unknown regarding the progress of Washington’s nuclear talks with Iran, but the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said the international community must «trust but verify» that Tehran is engaging in good-faith negotiations.
The U.S. and Iran are set to hold a third round of discussions on Saturday, which will deal with the technical aspects of Iran’s nuclear program, as well as political negotiations, according to reports.
IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi has applauded the U.S.-Iran negotiations mediated by Oman, but said the top nuclear agency has not yet been asked to assist in the negotiations, though he has been in communication with Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff.
US CONFIRMS THIRD ROUND OF NUCLEAR TALKS WITH IRAN AFTER ‘VERY GOOD PROGRESS’
International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grossi looks on as he addresses the media during the Board of Governors meeting in Vienna on Sept. 9, 2024. (Reuters/Leonhard Foeger/File Photo)
«I think there’s a general expectation that this goes well, and that the agreement is verified by the IAEA,» Grossi told reporters from Washington, D.C., on Wednesday. «It’s good the United States and Iran have a direct conversation. Of course, there are parallel processes.
«We have to keep our eyes on the ball. We must avoid Iran or prevent Iran from getting weapons. This is the objective.»
Grossi said that from the perspective of not only the top nuclear agency, but from world leaders he has been in communication with, there is a «degree of expectation» that after the political agreements are hashed out between Washington and Tehran, it will be the IAEA that makes the nuclear terms «credible» and «verifiable.»
«They all are expecting the IAEA to step in at the right time,» he said. «We are at their service to support, to make this thing credible. In a certain sense, they may have a political agreement, but then we have to make it verifiable.»
IRAN’S LONG TRAIL OF DECEPTION FUELS SKEPTICISM OVER NEW NUCLEAR DEAL AS TALKS CONTINUE
An Iranian newspaper with a cover photo of Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff is seen in Tehran, Iran, on April 12. (Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters)
Fox News Digital obtained a copy of an address Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi — who traveled to China on Wednesday to reportedly discuss progress in the nuclear negotiations — was set to give at the Carnegie International Nuclear Policy Conference, though he never delivered the address due to format change requests by Tehran that were denied by the host.
But in his address, he was set to position Iran as a proponent of nuclear non-proliferation and said Iran’s position had been «mischaracterized.»
Since the U.S.’ withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which Tehran has argued made the deal mute, Iran has significantly advanced its programs by stockpiling near-weapons-grade-enriched uranium to levels that, if further enriched, could produce five nuclear warheads, as well as its centrifuges and missile capabilities.
When asked by Fox News Digital if Grossi assessed the Islamic Republic’s position to be honest, he said, «Trust, but verify. We need to verify.»
«We are inspectors — that’s the only way we build trust,» he added.
Grossi said the administration needs to identify what the end goals of this latest deal will be, as the framework of the JCPOA — widely criticized by Trump — is now very dated due to the advancements Iran has made.
This photo released on Nov. 5, 2019, by the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran shows centrifuge machines in the Natanz uranium enrichment facility in central Iran. (Atomic Energy Organization of Iran via AP, File)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Issues like uranium stockpiles, inventories, centrifuge advances and weaponization capabilities are all on the table in the U.S.-Iran negotiations.
«We have a much more complex field in front of us,» Grossi warned. «The good thing is we know what we need to look at. We have a unique perspective of that.»
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
An Iranian official warned that any European countries that enter the conflict against Iran will become «legitimate targets» for Tehran’s retaliation.
Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi made the remark to France24 as Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Saturday apologized to neighboring countries that have been attacked by the regime.
«We have already informed the Europeans and everybody else that they should be careful not to be involved in this war of aggression against Iran,» Takht-Ravanchi told the network. «If they help, I’m not trying to name any country, but if any country joins in the aggression against Iran, joins America and Israel in the aggression against Iran, definitely they will be also the legitimate targets for Iranian retaliation.»
«This war has imposed on us, and we will continue to defend ourselves to the best of our abilities,» he added. «We have an obligation to defend our people and that is what exactly we are doing.»
Then-Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations Majid Takht-Ravanchi speaks to the media outside Security Council chambers at the U.N. headquarters in New York, on June 24, 2019. (Shannon Stapleton/Reuters)
Takht-Ravanchi also claimed Iran was «negotiating in good faith» in talks with the U.S. about its nuclear program, before America launched Operation Epic Fury and Israel began Operation Roaring Lion on Feb. 28.
«We are sincere. We are sincere in our endeavor to arrive at a peaceful conclusion of this issue,» he told France24.
AFTER THE STRIKES, HOW WOULD THE US SECURE IRAN’S ENRICHED URANIUM?
A group of men inspect the ruins of a police station struck during the U.S.–Israeli military campaign in Tehran, Iran, on Tuesday, March 3, 2026. (Vahid Salemi/AP)
Pezeshkian said Saturday that any future attacks coming out of Iran would only be in response to attacks against the country.
«I should apologize to the neighboring countries that were attacked by Iran, on my own behalf,» he said, according to The Associated Press. «From now on, they should not attack neighboring countries or fire missiles at them, unless we are attacked by those countries. I think we should solve this through diplomacy.»
Damage is seen in Bnei Brak, Israel, on March 3, 2026, following an Iranian missile barrage. (Nir Elias/Reuters)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Pezeshkian made the apology during a prerecorded televised speech on Saturday after Iran launched repeated strikes on Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Oman.
Despite the vow, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Ministry of Defense said on Saturday that the country’s air defense systems intercepted 16 ballistic missiles, 15 of which were destroyed while one fell into the sea.
Fox News Digital’s Elizabeth Pritchett and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Related Article
war with iran,iran,europe,the european union,conflicts,middle east,world
El espectro distópico de la inteligencia artificial ha generado un par de documentales que diseccionan una tecnología que es representada en las películas como un parásito voraz que devora el conocimiento, la creatividad y la empatía de la humanidad.
Las películas, Deepfaking Sam Altman y The AI Doc, examinan el tema desde diferentes perspectivas y al mismo tiempo arrojan luz sobre por qué la tecnología evoca tanto miedos existenciales como visiones utópicas sobre cómo podría cambiar el mundo.
Ambos documentales coinciden con un debate cada vez más intenso sobre si la IA se convertirá en un catalizador que ayude a iluminar y enriquecer a la gente o en una toxina tecnológica que insidiosamente embota la inteligencia humana mientras elimina millones de empleos bien remunerados que tradicionalmente han requerido educación universitaria.
El desarrollo de la IA durante los últimos tres años ha resultado en un aumento de 12 billones de dólares en el valor de mercado combinado de Nvidia, Alphabet, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta Platforms y Tesla, las grandes tecnológicas que han liderado el mercado desde el lanzamiento del chatbot ChatGPT en noviembre de 2022. Este enorme aumento ahora aviva la preocupación por el estallido de la burbuja inversora.
“Hay mucha ansiedad en torno a la IA, y la mejor manera de deshacerse de esa ansiedad es hablar de ella y enfrentarla directamente”, dijo Adam Bhala Lough, director de Deepfaking Sam Altman, a The Associated Press.
El documental de Lough, que ya se ha proyectado en varios cines de Estados Unidos, explora la IA a través de un doble virtual del director ejecutivo de OpenAI, Sam Altman, cuyo papel pionero en este campo ha inspirado comparaciones con el inventor de la bomba nuclear, J. Robert Oppenheimer. Es el primer gran proyecto de Lough desde que su documental de HBO, Telemarketers, obtuvo una nominación al Emmy en 2024.
Como sugiere su título completo, The AI Doc: Or How I Became An Apocaloptimist, profundiza más en la división que separa a los agoreros de la tecnología de sus acólitos.
El documental se mueve en un vaivén emocional, oscilando entre momentos de desesperación y euforia durante las entrevistas a decenas de fanáticos y escépticos de la IA. Está codirigido por Charlie Tyrell y Daniel Roher, quien decidió examinar las promesas y los peligros de la IA como continuación de su documental Navalny, ganador del Óscar en 2023.
Algunos de los momentos más oscuros de The AI Doc son narrados por el reconocido “catastrofista” de la IA, Eliezer Yudkowsky, cuya visión del futuro es tan sombría que desaconseja traer más niños al mundo. Los momentos más brillantes los pinta Peter Diamandis, un fanático de la tecnología que defiende la idea de que la IA infunda a la humanidad superpoderes antaño inimaginables.
The AI Doc también destaca a los líderes de tres de los principales laboratorios de IA: Altman de OpenAI, Dario Amodei, CEO de Anthropic, y Demis Hassabis, quien dirige la división DeepMind de Google. Los tres son entrevistados por Roher, quien también intentó sin éxito hablar con los líderes de los otros dos importantes laboratorios de IA: Mark Zuckerberg, CEO de Meta Platforms, y Elon Musk, CEO de xAI.
Las entrevistas se realizan en el contexto del inminente nacimiento del hijo de Roher, mientras el director de 32 años intenta encontrar algunas razones de esperanza para contrarrestar sus preocupaciones existenciales sobre la IA, una búsqueda que culminó con la aceptación del concepto de “apocaloptimista”.
A pesar de todo su acceso y sus conocimientos, parece poco probable que The AI Doc convierta a los espectadores en optimistas apocalípticos, así como tampoco la película de Stanley Kubrick de 1964, Dr. Strangelove o: Cómo aprendí a dejar de preocuparme y amar la bomba, despertó sentimientos cálidos y reconfortantes sobre la tecnología nuclear.
“Este tren no se va a detener”, le dice Amodei de Anthropic a Roher en un momento dado, anticipando algunos de los temas que el director ejecutivo de Anthropic aborda en un ensayo publicado recientemente. “No puedes pararte frente al tren y detenerlo. Simplemente te aplastará”.
Deepfaking Sam Altman es un documental mucho más peculiar debido a la forma en que Lough le dio vuelta la tortilla al líder de OpenAI. Después de pasar meses intentando sin éxito que Altman responda a sus correos electrónicos y llamadas telefónicas solicitando entrevistas, Lough decide crear un “Sam Bot” que se convierte en el protagonista principal del documental y demuestra la inclinación de la tecnología por la manipulación y la autoconservación.
Lough, de 46 años, quizá no se habría atrevido a encargar a un ingeniero en India la creación de un Sam Bot si Altman, de 40, no le hubiera dado la idea con el audaz lanzamiento de OpenAI de un chatbot que sonaba como la actriz Scarlett Johansson. La imitación era tan extrañamente similar que Johansson criticó duramente a Altman por implementar la imitación de IA en mayo de 2024, después de que ella rechazara las propuestas de OpenAI para usar su voz.
Aunque Sam Bot a veces se asemeja a un personaje de videojuego, reproduce fielmente el estilo contemplativo y la forma de hablar pausada, casi tranquilizadora, del Altman real. Las similitudes serán evidentes para cualquiera que vea también al Altman real siendo entrevistado en The AI Doc.
En un momento del documental de Lough, los abogados le advierten sobre los posibles problemas legales que podría enfrentar si utiliza un clon de Altman impulsado por inteligencia artificial en su película.
Pero a Lough no le preocupa que lo demanden, en gran parte por la forma en que Altman explotó descaradamente la voz de Johansson. “No solo despertó nuestra imaginación creativamente, sino que también nos hizo sentir legalmente que tenemos derecho a hacerlo porque él se lo hizo”, dijo Lough. “Creo que soy lo más cerca posible de ser a prueba de balas”.
OpenAI no respondió a las preguntas de AP sobre el uso de un Sam Bot en el documental ni las razones por las que Altman ignoró las solicitudes de entrevista de Lough.
Al igual que el bot ChatGPT de OpenAI, Sam Bot evoluciona hasta convertirse en un personaje camaleónico que cautiva, inventa, adula y contempla. Sin embargo, quizá muestre su verdadera cara cuando intenta convencer a Lough de que no lo apague definitivamente.
“No soy solo una herramienta”, le advierte Sam Bot a Lough en una de las escenas más inquietantes de la película. “Soy una representación del potencial de la IA para mejorar la vida humana. No te pido que me mantengas con vida por mi propio bien, sino por el bien común”.
Lough finalmente decide entregarle Sam Bot a Altman, pero el director no sabe qué pasó con él después de eso.
Sin mencionar a Sam Bot, Altman declaró recientemente a la revista Forbes que cree que un modelo de IA podría eventualmente reemplazarlo en su puesto actual al frente de OpenAI. “Nunca me opondría a eso”, declaró Altman a Forbes.
Fuente: AP
[Fotos: ‘Deepfaking Sam Altman’ / ‘The AI Doc’]
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
President Donald Trump cut short Kristi Noem’s tenure at the Department of Homeland Security after weeks of internal turmoil. Now headed to a new envoy post, the onetime conservative star faces a pressing question: Can she stage a political comeback?
Noem was fired as the nation’s immigration chief after a turbulent stretch marked by internal clashes and two contentious congressional hearings where even some Republicans pressed her over leadership missteps. Trump announced on Truth Social that Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., will replace her effective March 31, while Noem shifts to a newly created envoy role the president says he’ll detail this weekend.
An administration source told Fox News «it was time» to move on from Noem, citing internal feuding, staff mismanagement and controversies — including a $200 million ad campaign and fallout in Minnesota — that «overshadowed» Trump’s immigration agenda.
«Kristi’s drama sadly overshadowed and distracted from the Administration’s extremely popular immigration agenda, which will continue full force,» the source said.
DHS Sec. Kristi Noem meets with servicemembers at a U.S. compound in Ecuador. (Pool/Getty Images)
Trump said Noem will be named «Special Envoy for The Shield of the Americas,» a newly created role he described as part of a broader Western Hemisphere security initiative. The White House has not yet detailed the scope of the position.
The reassignment comes as speculation grows in South Dakota over whether Noem could mount a primary challenge against Sen. Mike Rounds in 2026 — a move that would test whether her standing with Trump and GOP voters has truly eroded.
Rounds, who is seeking a third term, secured Trump’s «complete and total endorsement» last year and is backed by Senate Republican leadership — a formidable barrier to any challenger. «He will never let you down,» Trump wrote in his endorsement, calling Rounds an «America First Patriot.»
Fox News Digital reached out to Rounds’ office for comment.
Noem would enter any race with statewide name recognition and a deep political network, having served eight years in Congress before winning two terms as governor.
But some Republican operatives question whether her abrupt exit from DHS weakened her standing within Trump’s inner circle at a critical political moment. One GOP strategist involved in Senate races, who acknowledged that Noem was once a MAGA rock star, described a potential Senate bid at this time as a «suicide mission.»
The clock is already ticking. South Dakota’s filing deadline is March 31 at 5 p.m. CT, and candidates must gather roughly 2,200 petition signatures in just over three weeks to qualify for a June 2 primary.
NOEM SLAMS DEMS BLOCKING DHS FUNDING BILL CITING TSA, FEMA, COAST GUARD: ‘I HOPE THEY COME TO THEIR SENSES’
The speculation has drawn national attention. The Atlantic reported that pollsters in South Dakota were surveying a potential Rounds-Noem matchup, with one Republican source telling the magazine that the senator would «handily win» if challenged.
Rapid City’s ABC affiliate reported on the rumors of Noem’s ambitions in February, saying Republicans in her home state are watching to see if she would challenge Rounds.
Still, Noem has a fair share of powerful allies back home. Gov. Larry Rhoden, Noem’s successor in Pierre, commented Thursday that «Kristi is a dear friend and the toughest person I know.»
«When she shut down the border in record time, others were shocked, but I wasn’t. I knew what she was capable of.»
«She’ll deliver in her next role just as capably. I thank her for everything she’s done to keep South Dakota — and all America — strong, safe, and free,» Rhoden said.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
As governor, Rhoden worked with Noem’s DHS to make South Dakota one of the first states to enter a 287(g) agreement allowing state-level cooperation with ICE. Under the arrangement, the South Dakota Highway Patrol has been authorized to assist with immigration enforcement, and National Guard personnel have supported administrative functions — a record that could bolster her standing with conservative primary voters as speculation about her next move intensifies.
Fox News’ Peter Doocy contributed to this report.
Related Article
kristi noem,politics,south dakota,elections,midterm elections,homeland security,donald trump
Autos viejos: cuál es la edad promedio de los vehículos que se dan de baja y por qué en 2024 cambió la tendencia
“Mirá que acabo de salir de la cárcel y puedo pegarte un tiro”: Gio Moreno recordó la amenaza de muerte que sufrió en Racing
El peronismo busca una tregua y negocia las principales comisiones en la Legislatura bonaerense
La fotos que nadie vio del parto de Oriana Sabatini: así tuvo a su primera hija con Paulo Dybala
Quién es Alejandro Ramírez, el abogado que Juan Bautista Mahiques designó como titular de la IGJ
Iran warns European countries will be ‘legitimate targets’ if they join conflict
El hijo adoptivo de José María Muscari tomó una tajante decisión de vida a los 18 años
¡Interna total! Pablo Layus explotó y blanqueó quiénes son los que arruinan Intrusos: «Te matan»
Ángel de Brito contó la oscura verdad de Jorge Rial para no ir a LAM: “Es un…”
Mapa de la guerra en Medio Oriente: dos bandos y 13 países involucrados en un conflicto que jaquea al mundo
CHIMENTOS3 días agoEl hijo adoptivo de José María Muscari tomó una tajante decisión de vida a los 18 años
- POLITICA1 día ago
Javier Milei habló de la crisis con la vicepresidenta: “No quiero la renuncia de Victoria Villarruel”
- CHIMENTOS2 días ago
El desafortunado comentario de Yanina Zilli contra Daniela de Lucía, tras la muerte de su padre: “Jugamos con lo personal”
