Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Russia and China tick Doomsday Clock toward midnight as Hiroshima bombing hits 80 years

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Wednesday marks the 80th anniversary of when the U.S. employed the first ever nuclear bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima, followed by the bombing of Nagasaki three days later on Aug. 9. But despite nearly a century of lessons learned, nuclear warfare still remains a significant threat.

Advertisement

«This is the first time that the United States is facing down two nuclear peer adversaries – Russia and China,» Rebeccah Heinrichs, nuclear expert and senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, told Fox News Digital.

Heinrichs explained that not only are Moscow and Beijing continuing to develop new nuclear capabilities and delivery systems, but they are increasingly collaborating with one another in direct opposition to the West, and more pointedly, the U.S.

TRUMP LIFTS VEIL ON US SUBMARINES IN WARNING SHOT TO KREMLIN IN ‘CLEVER’ REPOSITIONING MOVE

Advertisement

An aerial photograph of Hiroshima, Japan, shortly after the «Little Boy» atomic bomb was dropped in 1945. (Universal History Archive/UIG via Getty images)

«It’s a much more complex nuclear threat environment than what the United States even had to contend with during the Cold War, where we just had one nuclear peer adversary in the Soviet Union,» she said. «In that regard, it’s a serious problem, especially when both China and Russia are investing in nuclear capabilities and at the same time have revanchist goals.»

Despite the known immense devastation that would accompany an atomic war between two nuclear nations, concern has been growing that the threat of nuclear war is on the rise. 

Advertisement

The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki – which collectively killed some 200,000 people, not including the dozens of thousands who later died from radiation poisoning and cancer – have been attributed with bringing an end to World War II.

But the bombs did more than end the deadliest war in human history – they forever changed military doctrine, sparked a nuclear arms race and cemented the concept of deterrence through the theory of mutually assured destruction.

Earlier this year the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists moved forward the «Doomsday Clock» by one second – pushing it closer to «midnight,» or atomic meltdown, than ever before.

Advertisement

In January, the board of scientists and security officials in charge of the 78-year-old clock, which is used to measure the threat level of nuclear warfare, said that moving the clock to 89 seconds to midnight «signals that the world is on a course of unprecedented risk, and that continuing on the current path is a form of madness.»

TRUMP CONFIRMS 2 NUCLEAR SUBMARINES ARE ‘IN THE REGION’ TO COUNTER RUSSIA

Putin Xi

Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping shake hands during a meeting in Beijing on Oct. 18, 2023. (Sergei Guneyev/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

Despite the escalated nuclear threats coming out of North Korea, and international concern over the Iranian nuclear program, the threat level largely came down to the three biggest players in the nuclear arena: Russia, the U.S. and China.

Advertisement

The increased threat level was attributed to Russia’s refusal to comply with international nuclear treaties amid its continuously escalating war in Ukraine and its hostile opposition to NATO nations, as well as China’s insistence on expanding its nuclear arsenal.

But the Bulletin, which was founded by scientists on the Manhattan Project in 1945 to inform the public of the dangers of atomic warfare, also said the U.S. has a role in the increased nuclear threat level.

«The U.S. has abdicated its role as a voice of caution. It seems inclined to expand its nuclear arsenal and adopt a posture that reinforces the belief that ‘limited’ use of nuclear weapons can be managed,» the Bulletin said. «Such misplaced confidence could have us stumble into a nuclear war.»

Advertisement

But Heinrichs countered the «alarmist» message and argued that deterrence remains a very real protectant against nuclear warfare, even as Russia increasingly threatens Western nations with atomic use.

«I do think that it’s a serious threat. I don’t think it’s inevitable that we’re sort of staring down nuclear Armageddon,» she said. 

CHINA’S GROWING NUCLEAR ARSENAL AIMS TO BREAK US ALLIANCES AND DOMINATE ASIA, REPORT WARNS

Advertisement
Russia nuclear test

A Yars intercontinental ballistic missile is launched from an air field during military drills in Russia on Feb. 19, 2022. (Russian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP, File)

Heinrichs argued the chief threat is not the number of nuclear warheads a nation possesses, but in how they threaten to employ their capabilities.

«I think that whenever there is a threat of nuclear use, it’s because adversaries, authoritarian countries, in particular Russia, is threatening to use nuclear weapons to invade another country. And that’s where the greatest risk of deterrence failure is,» she said. «It’s not because of the sheer number of nuclear weapons.»

Heinrichs said Russia is lowering the nuclear threshold by routinely threatening to employ nuclear weapons in a move to coerce Western nations to capitulate to their demands, as in the case of capturing territory in Ukraine and attempting to deny it NATO access.

Advertisement

Instead, she argued that the U.S. and its allies need to improve their deterrence by not only staying on top of their capabilities but expanding their nuclear reach in regions like the Indo-Pacific.

Russia, Nuclear arsenal

A rocket launches from missile system from the Plesetsk facility in northwestern Russia on Dec. 9, 2020. (Russian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP, File)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«The answer is not to be so afraid of it or alarmed that you capitulate, because you’re only going to beget more nuclear coercion if you do that,» she said. «The answer is to prudently, carefully communicate to the Russians they are not going to succeed through nuclear coercion, that the United States also has credible response options.

Advertisement

«We also have nuclear weapons, and we have credible and proportional responses, and so they shouldn’t go down that path,» Heinrichs said. «That’s how we maintain the nuclear peace. That’s how we deter conflict. And that’s how we ensure that a nuclear weapon is not used.»



nuclear proliferation,russia,china,world war two,defense,world

INTERNACIONAL

Senate Democrats are feverishly recruiting top candidates to win back majority in 2026 midterms

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

As they mount their uphill effort to win back the Senate majority in next year’s midterm elections, Democrats feel that they’re on a roll.

Advertisement

Late last month, they landed their biggest recruit to date, when former two-term Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper of North Carolina declared his candidacy in the 2026 race to succeed retiring Republican Sen. Thom Tillis.

Democrats view the open Senate seat in the crucial southeastern battleground state as a top pick-up opportunity next year as they try to win back control of the Senate, which the Republicans currently hold with a 53-47 majority.

«It’s hard to overstate the importance of getting Gov. Cooper to run for the Senate in North Carolina, and already we are seeing a potential for a ripple effect,» longtime Democratic strategist Chris Moyer told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

THIS REPUBLICAN JUST JUMPED INTO BATTLEGROUND GEORGIA’S HIGH-PROFILE SENATE RACE 

Then-Gov. Roy Cooper, a Democrat from North Carolina, speaks with reporters on Sept. 10, 2024, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Paul Steinhauser – Fox News )

Moyer, a veteran campaign communicator, said that Cooper recruitment is «giving more faith to potential candidates who are questioning whether there’s a chance for a Democratic majority in the Senate next year.»

Advertisement

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) Chair Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, after landing Cooper, said he «is a formidable candidate who will flip North Carolina’s Senate seat.»

Top Democrats now have their eyes on former Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio, who lost last year’s re-election bid in a onetime top swing state that’s become reliably red over the past decade.

WHAT A TOP POLITICAL HANDICAPPER SAID ABOUT THE DEMOCRATS’ CHANCES TO WIN BACK SENATE IN 2026

Advertisement

Schumer, the top Democrat in the Senate, trekked to Ohio this summer in hopes of convincing Brown to take on Republican Sen. Jon Husted, Fox News confirmed.

Brown, who served over three decades in the House and later the Senate, is viewed by Democrats as the only candidate who could potentially topple Husted, who was named at the beginning of this year to fill the seat left vacant when then-Sen. JD Vance stepped down to become vice president. 

Then Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, walks through the U.S. Capitol in July 2024

Former Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio is seriously considering a 2026 bid to return to the Senate. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Democrats landed the candidate they were hoping for in swing state New Hampshire in the race to succeed retiring longtime Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen.

Advertisement

Four-term Rep. Chris Pappas’ announcement in early April that he would run to succeed Shaheen has cleared the Democratic primary field, as of now, of any potential rivals for the party’s Senate nomination.

Democratic Rep. Chris Pappas of New Hampshire is running for the Senate in 2026.

Democratic Senate candidate in New Hampshire Rep. Chris Pappas is interviewed by Fox News Digital on July 4, 2025, in Portsmouth, N.H. (Paul Steinhauser – Fox News)

Meanwhile, a Republican primary in the state – where the GOP hasn’t won a Senate race in 15 years – is heating up between former Sen. Scott Brown and state Sen. Dan Innis, with the possibility of more candidates entering the race.

In battleground Georgia, which President Donald Trump narrowly carried in last year’s White House race, Republicans view first-term Sen. Jon Ossoff as the most vulnerable Democrat incumbent up for re-election next year.

Advertisement

But Ossoff is off to a very hot fundraising start, and a GOP primary between Reps. Mike Collins and Buddy Carter, and former college and professional football coach Derek Dooley, is starting to turn combustible.

Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff of Georgia was first elected in 2021. He is running for re-election in the 2026 midterms.

Republicans view Sen. Jon Ossoff as the most vulnerable Democrat running for re-election in the 2026 midterm elections. (AP)

Of potential concern for the Democrats is Michigan, where the dynamics appear to be the opposite of Georgia, in the race to succeed retiring Democratic Sen. Gary Peters.

Former Rep. Mike Rogers, the 2024 GOP Senate nominee who narrowly lost last year’s race, appears to have cleared the Republican, thanks in great part to Trump’s endorsement and likely arm twisting by the president’s political team.

Advertisement

Democrats, meanwhile, have a very competitive primary on their hands. The primary race includes three well-known Democrats: Rep. Haley Stevens, state Sen. Mallory McMorrow, and former gubernatorial candidate Abdul El-Sayed, who enjoys the backing of progressive champion Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

And popular Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan is running for the Senate as an independent, which could potentially hurt Democrats in the general election.

While Texas has long been a reliable red state, and conservative firebrand Sen. Ted Cruz comfortably won re-election last year, Democrats are optimistic about their 2026 chances to potentially flip a red seat to blue.

Advertisement

That’s because longtime GOP Sen. John Cornyn is facing a serious primary challenge from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a MAGA world rockstar.

Former Rep. Colin Allred of Texas is running for the Senate in 2026

Former Rep. Colin Allred of Texas, seen on the campaign trail last October, is running for a second straight election cycle for the Senate.  (Reuters/Marco Bello)

Paxton has long been surrounded by scandals, and is now dealing with a headline-grabbing divorce with his wife, state Sen. Angela Paxtom. And Democrats believe if Paxton topples Cornyn in next March’s GOP primary, he’ll be toxic in the general election.

But Democrats could have a competitive primary in Texas as well.

Advertisement

Former Rep. Colin Allred, who lost to Cruz last November, launched a second straight campaign earlier this year.

Former Rep. Beto O’Rourke, who came close to ousting Cruz in the state’s 20218 Senate election before unsuccessfully running for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination and losing the 2022 Texas gubernatorial race to GOP Gov. Greg Abbott, is taking a hard look at a 2026 Senate run.

State Rep. James Talarico, who grabbed national attention recently for his appearance with popular podcaster Joe Rogan, and Rep. Joaquin Castro, are also mulling bids.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Democrats also feel they may have a shot in Iowa – a onetime swing state that’s become firmly red in recent election cycles – if Republican Sen. Joni Ernst decides against seeking a third term in the Senate.

But they’ll likely have a much better chance of flipping a GOP-held seat in blue state Maine if longtime Republican incumbent Sen. Susan Collins decides against seeking re-election.

Advertisement

democrats senate,senate,midterm elections,elections,donald trump,democratic party,republicans elections

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Witkoff meets with Putin over war in Ukraine, no ceasefire agreements announced

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

White House envoy Steve Witkoff landed in Russia on Wednesday for his fifth visit with Russian President Vladimir Putin as President Donald Trump looks to force a peace deal and bring an end to the three-and-a-half-year war in Ukraine. 

Advertisement

Little seems to have been accomplished from the three-hour meeting in the way of securing a peace deal, or even circumventing the threatened sanctions by Trump that Putin now stares down, though according to Russian foreign policy advisor Yuri Ushakov, the meeting was described as «useful and constructive.»

Ushakov said Putin «received some signals from Trump» and «sent some signals,» but he did not elaborate on any specifics.

 Russian President Vladimir Putin (L) meets with US President’s Special Envoy Steve Witkoff (R) at Kremlin Palace in Moscow, Russia on August 6, 2025.  (Kremlin Press Office / Handout/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Advertisement

WITKOFF SCRAMBLES FOR PEACE DEAL WITH RUSSIA AS SANCTIONS LOOM TARGETING INDIA, CHINA

The advisor also told reporters that Putin and Witkoff had discussed developing the «strategic partnership» between the U.S. and Russia but did not elaborate how. The comment came after Witkoff was spotted earlier in the day taking a walk near the Kremlin with Kirill Dmitriev, the Russian president’s envoy for investment and economic cooperation.

Witkoff and Putin met shortly before noon in Moscow, according to the timestamp released by the Kremlin which accompanied an image of Putin and Witkoff smiling and shaking hands as Russian foreign policy advisor Yuri Ushakov looked on. 

Advertisement

Witkoff’s team did not respond to Fox News Digital’s questions on what the envoy was hoping to accomplish in his meeting with Putin, though some reporting this week suggested he may look to secure a moratorium on air strikes.

A Russian airstrike hits a residential building in Kyiv, Ukraine.

A police officer at the site of a Russian air strike that hit a residential building in Kyiv, Ukraine, on Thursday, July 10, 2025. (Andrew Kravchenko/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Witkoff traveled to Moscow in a last-ditch effort to get Putin to capitulate to Trump’s and Western calls for an end to the war, though the Kremlin chief was not expected to make great concessions in ending his war ambitions ahead of the trip. 

In mid-July, while seated next to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Trump promised to enforce «very severe» tariffs on Russia if Putin does not enter into a deal with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy within 50 days. 

Advertisement

«Tariffs at about 100%, you’d call them secondary tariffs,» he had said, implying that nations who trade with Russia will see 100% tariffs slapped on them when trading with the U.S. 

He then pushed the date up to within 10 days of July 29, forcing the new deadline for Friday.

But on Tuesday Trump walked back his 100% tariff threat amid tough trade talks with India and China, and said, «I never said a percentage.»

Advertisement

«We’ll see what happens over the next fairly short period of time,» he added in response to questions from reporters. «We have a meeting with Russia tomorrow. We’re going to see what happens. 

Trump and Rutte enter into a new NATO deal.

President Donald Trump, right, and Mark Rutte, secretary general of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), shake hands during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Monday, July 14, 2025.  (Yuri Gripas/Abaca/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«We’ll make that determination at that time,» he added. 

Advertisement

The tariffs would most drastically target China and India, which are the largest purchasers of Russian oil, though high tariffs on those nations, both of which are major traders with the U.S., would also mean higher prices for the American consumer.



russia,vladimir putin,ukraine,donald trump,world

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Italia aprobó la construcción del puente colgante más largo del mundo sobre el estrecho de Mesina

Published

on


La estructura que unirá la isla con la península será el puente colgante más largo del mundo, con un vano central de 3.300 metros. (Webuild)

El gobierno italiano aprobó este miércoles el proyecto definitivo para la construcción del puente sobre el estrecho de Mesina, una obra faraónica de 13.532 millones de euros que unirá por primera vez la península italiana con la isla de Sicilia mediante lo que será el puente colgante más largo del mundo.

El visto bueno fue otorgado por el Comité Interministerial para la Planificación Económica y el Desarrollo Sostenible (Cipess), tras evaluar la documentación técnica y financiera presentada por el Ministerio de Infraestructuras y Transportes y las empresas involucradas en el proyecto.

Advertisement

El ministro de Infraestructuras y viceprimer ministro, Matteo Salvini, anunció en rueda de prensa que espera “iniciar las obras, los trabajos y las expropiaciones entre septiembre y octubre”, una vez que el Tribunal de Cuentas otorgue su aprobación final. Salvini describió el proyecto como una “obra sin precedentes en el mundo” y un “proyecto de ingeniería fascinante” que acelerará el desarrollo económico del sur de Italia.

Según las estimaciones oficiales, una
Según las estimaciones oficiales, una vez completado entre 2032 y 2033, el puente tendrá una capacidad máxima de hasta 6.000 vehículos por hora y 200 trenes al día. (Webuild)

La estructura que unirá la isla con la península será el puente colgante más largo del mundo, con un vano central de 3.300 metros. Estará sostenido por dos torres de 399 metros de altura, situadas en las costas de Calabria y Sicilia, unidas por cuatro cables de suspensión.

El puente contará con tres carriles de carretera por sentido, dos carriles de servicio y dos vías ferroviarias en el centro. El tablero tendrá 60,4 metros de ancho y una altura de 72 metros sobre el nivel del mar para permitir el paso de embarcaciones de gran calado.

El tablero tendrá 60,4 metros
El tablero tendrá 60,4 metros de ancho y una altura de 72 metros sobre el nivel del mar (Webuild)

Según las estimaciones oficiales, una vez completado entre 2032 y 2033, el puente tendrá una capacidad máxima de hasta 6.000 vehículos por hora y 200 trenes al día, reduciendo dramáticamente el tiempo de viaje entre Calabria y Sicilia de las actuales dos o tres horas en ferry a apenas 15 minutos por carretera y 10 minutos en tren.

Los costos han aumentado significativamente:
Los costos han aumentado significativamente: de 4.400 millones de euros estimados hace dos décadas a los actuales 13.500 millones.(Webuild)

La construcción del puente que una la región de Calabria con la ciudad de Messina es una idea que se estudia desde 1971. El ex primer ministro Silvio Berlusconi relanzó el proyecto durante su segundo gobierno (2001-2006) como uno de sus grandes sueños, aunque nunca llegó a colocarse la primera piedra.

Los intentos por construir un puente sobre el estrecho de Mesina se remontan incluso a tiempos antiguos. Según el cronista romano Plinio el Viejo, en el año 252 a.C. un cónsul logró trasladar 100 elefantes de guerra capturados desde Sicilia hasta la península italiana utilizando balsas hechas de “filas de barriles atados”.

Advertisement

En 2005, Berlusconi otorgó el primer contrato de 3.900 millones de euros para el puente, pero fue archivado meses después cuando cayó su gobierno. Al regresar al poder dos años más tarde, intentó revivir el proyecto, pero fue cancelado nuevamente en 2011 durante la crisis de deuda soberana europea.

Los costos han aumentado significativamente: de 4.400 millones de euros estimados hace dos décadas a los actuales 13.500 millones.

El viceprimer ministro y ministro
El viceprimer ministro y ministro de Infraestructura Matteo Salvini y la primera ministra italiana Giorgia Meloni. (REUTERS/Guglielmo Mangiapane/archivo)

El gobierno de Giorgia Meloni ha reenmarcado el proyecto no solo como una obra de desarrollo económico, sino como una infraestructura estratégica crucial para la seguridad nacional. Italia ha comprometido aumentar su gasto en defensa al 5% del PIB dentro de una década como parte de sus compromisos con la OTAN, destinando 1,5% del PIB a infraestructuras estratégicas.

“El puente del estrecho de Mesina constituye una infraestructura fundamental con respecto a la movilidad militar, teniendo en cuenta la presencia de importantes bases de la OTAN en el sur de Italia”, señalaron las autoridades italianas en un informe de abril.

Advertisement

Sin embargo, expertos como Alessandro Marrone del Instituto de Asuntos Internacionales de Roma cuestionan esta justificación, argumentando que la prioridad de la OTAN es facilitar el despliegue rápido de tropas hacia el este europeo en caso de ataque ruso.

Marrone dijo al Financial Times que Italia debía centrarse en mejorar los puertos, aeropuertos y carreteras de las regiones donde están estacionadas sus tropas: “Si hay que ir al este, hay que hacerlo por el Adriático, en avión o por los Alpes”.

Se espera que el proyecto movilice más de 23.000 millones de euros en inversiones totales y genere aproximadamente 120.000 puestos de trabajo durante su ejecución. El consorcio Eurolink, liderado por la empresa italiana Webuild y que incluye la participación de 235 compañías —entre ellas la española Sacyr con un 22,4% de participación—, además de empresas japonesas y danesas, se adjudicó la obra.

Advertisement
El proyecto enfrenta resistencia local
El proyecto enfrenta resistencia local por su impacto ambiental y social (Webuild)

Sin embargo, el proyecto enfrenta resistencias. Diversas asociaciones ciudadanas y medioambientales han denunciado los posibles daños al ecosistema marino del estrecho de Mesina y alertan sobre el riesgo de infiltración de mafias locales, como la ‘Ndrangheta en Calabria y Cosa Nostra en Sicilia.

La Dirección de Investigación Antimafia ha advertido en varias ocasiones sobre estos peligros, por lo que no se descarta que se presenten denuncias legales contra el proyecto.

Los residentes de Messina también se han movilizado para intentar detener el proyecto, que requerirá cambios masivos en la ciudad, incluyendo la reubicación de la estación de tren y demoliciones de algunos barrios.

A pesar de las controversias, el gobierno describió el puente como “infraestructura estratégica” y de “interés nacional” para completar las redes transeuropeas de transporte, con lo que describe como un “acelerador del desarrollo” para dos de las regiones más pobres de Italia.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias