Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

South Korea’s move to lower tensions with Kim Jong Un threatens 400,000 Christians

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FIRST ON FOX: A move aimed at lowering tensions between South and North Korea is threatening, rather than improving, life for the estimated 400,000 Christians who live in the North. The policy has been slammed as «a catastrophic strategic mistake.» 

Advertisement

South Korea’s new President, Lee Jae-myung, ordered a reported 80% of radio broadcasts from the South, beamed into the North, to stop transmitting in May. The President also declared that loudspeakers that had been broadcasting anti-communist propaganda on the border between the two countries should be taken down.

Myung reportedly told his Cabinet in Seoul, «I hope such reciprocal measures will gradually lead to dialogue and communication» between the two Koreas, the Korea Times reported Tuesday, adding that the South Korean President wants South and North Korea to «shift from a relationship that causes harm to each other to one that is mutually beneficial.»

NORTH KOREA BREAKS SILENCE ON TRUMP’S RETURN, SENDS MESSAGE FROM ‘ROCKET MAN’

Advertisement

A South Korean Christian radio station recording material for broadcast in 2021.

In a statement reported by news website korea.net on August 5, South Korea’s defense ministry added that the new measures were «practical measures to help ease inter-Korean tensions, within a range that does not affect the military’s readiness posture.»

But the shutdown of radio stations is having a drastic effect on North Korea’s Christians. The Kim Jong-un regime has ruled that it is a crime to worship Christianity. Even being found with a Bible can lead to execution, normally with a bullet, sometimes reportedly after torture. 

Advertisement

There’s no general access to the internet for ordinary citizens. The only practical way Christians can experience the Gospel and Christian teaching or thoughts is to secretly listen to a radio. But now the Stimson Center’s 38 North, a publication analyzing data on North Korea, says broadcasts into the country from the South, including broadcasts previously backed by the U.S. Agency for Global Media, have been cut back by almost 80% since May, and they advise that level could fall even further over the coming months.

Painting North Korea

Kim Jong Un depicted riding a horse atop Mount Paektu, a sacred site in North Korea.  (KCNA)

It’s also reported that it is more difficult to hear the Christian message now. Because there are fewer broadcasts still going into the North, authorities are said to be having greater success in electronically jamming them. 

A U.S. State Department spokesperson expressed concern, telling Fox News Digital, «Under the leadership of President Trump and Secretary Rubio, the State Department Office of International Religious Freedom is actively looking into new ways to advance freedom of religion around the world, including in North Korea, and for North Korea’s severely persecuted Christian community. President Trump is a champion for religious freedom globally, including defending people’s ability to read the Bible and freely access religious texts.»

Advertisement

It is impossible to over-estimate the importance of these broadcasts to Christians in North Korea, Timothy Cho, who defected from the country when he was 17, told Fox News Digital from London. Cho serves on the Secretariat of the British government’s All-Party Parliamentary Group on North Korea, saying «we are sharing the Gospel with our brothers and sisters on the ground in North Korea. This significance we cannot compare with any amount of values, because it is hope. It is hope, and it is light and it is the message they can rely on during the darkest time inside North Korea.»

BISHOP’S VILLAGE ATTACKED, 20 SLAIN AFTER RECENT TESTIMONY TO CONGRESS ON CHRISTIAN PERSECUTION

April 19: North Korean leader Kim Jung-Un waves as he arrives to take pictures with officials, creators and employees of the Mansudae Art Studio in Pyongyang.

President Trump is to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un for a summit sometime next month. (Reuters)

In North Korea, Cho claimed, the ruling Kim family dynasty is portrayed collectively as gods, not only the so-called ‘Supreme Leaders,» but supreme beings. He explained that’s why Christianity is so feared by the government. He added that «the most dangerous threat to North Korean authority is the claim of there being a true God who is not connected to the Kim dynasty.»

Advertisement

«Underground Christianity provides a space for the free exchange of ideas. Christianity is a defining feature of the DNA of the Korean people,» Greg Scarlatiou, President and CEO of the Washington-based Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, told Fox News Digital. «The Kim family regime wants none of that, having tried so hard to obliterate the true identity of the Korean people.»

«The shutting down of radio stations beaming information into North Korea is a catastrophic strategic mistake. True change can’t come from the Kim family. It can only come from the people of North Korea, especially Christians. And the only thing the outside world can do to help them is empowerment through information.»

North Korea is at the top of Open Doors’ World Watch List for persecution of Christians again this year. Open Doors is a global organization that supports and speaks up for Christians persecuted for their faith. The report noted, «Police and intelligence agents search homes without warning. If they find Christian materials, it is considered a crime against the nation, and the whole family can be banished, imprisoned or executed. Those who use an unregistered smartphone or radio to access unapproved media are punished.»

Advertisement

The report continued, «Christians only dare to listen to radio programs at night, hidden under blankets. Each act of worship, even though conducted by oneself, is perceived as an «act of extreme disloyalty.» Citizens are trained to report anyone who might be an enemy of the regime, including family members.

A bible from North Korea, September 21, 2021.

A bible from North Korea, September 21, 2021. (Open Doors)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«The national media broadcast anti-Christian content, where Christians are portrayed as evil betrayers of the nation, and missionary activities are referred to as acts of terrorism,» the Open Doors report noted.

Advertisement

On Thursday, Kim Yo-jong, the North Korean leader’s sister, and Deputy Department Director of the Publicity and Information Department of the ruling Workers Party in Pyongyang, made it clear that North Korea will not lessen controls. She released a statement, monitored by a source in Seoul, reportedly saying, «We don’t care whether South Korea dismantles the loudspeakers or stops the broadcasts. We have no intention of improving relations with America’s loyal lackeys.» 

 

Advertisement



north korea,south korea,christianity religion,kim jong un

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Donald Trump se mete en la disputa por una isla en el Océano Índico y choca con Gran Bretaña

Published

on


El remoto archipiélago de Chagos y su isla Diego Garcia se convirtió en un conflicto entre Gran Bretaña, el gobierno de Donald Trump -que quiere utilizar la isla para atacar a Irán el sábado y se niega a que sea transferido a Mauricio-, y los isleños, que han regresado para una ocupación simbólica de sus islas, tras ser expulsados. No tienen agua caliente ni fuego para calentar la comida. Sus tiendas de campaña dejan entrar la lluvia, pero están en casa.

Después de 50 años, cuatro isleños de Chagos han desafiado las adversidades y han vencido a las lanchas patrulleras para desembarcar en las blancas playas de la Île du Coin, en un barquito.

Advertisement

Misley Mandarin, primer ministro electo de Chagos, su padre Michel, de 74 años, Antoine LeMettre y un chagosiano identificado solo como Pascal, esperan ser los primeros de cientos de personas que regresan al archipiélago.

Esta es “la avanzada» de chagosianos británicos, que protestan contra su desalojo de las islas en las décadas de 1960 y 1970 y están decididos a seguir viviendo allí.

«Nos estamos adaptando bien», dijo Mandarin al diario The Telegraph desde la isla. “Tenemos una olla arrocera, le echamos un poco de agua y luego preparamos fideos instantáneos con sabor a cerdo a la barbacoa”.

Advertisement

“Pescamos peces y hay cangrejos gigantes, pero no nos dejan comerlos. Intentamos respetar el medio ambiente. Ayer la tienda de campaña tenía goteras y mi padre y Antoine estábamos todos empapados. Pero queremos quedarnos. Esto es nuestro. Queremos quedarnos. El grupo de avanzada llegó a casa a las 5 de la mañana del martes e instaló tiendas de campaña en la playa, una de las cuales ondeaba la bandera de Chagos” contó.

Poco más de 24 horas después, a las 7 y media de la mañana del miércoles, un gran barco apareció en el horizonte. Envió una lancha patrullera con funcionarios del Territorio Británico del Océano Índico.

Todo era muy británico. Los agentes de policía tomaron café con los recién llegados. Les entregaron una orden de desalojo y, curiosamente, les dijeron que no tenían permitido encender fuego en la playa. El Estado británico expulsa a ciudadanos británicos de territorio británico.

Advertisement

Desalojo

Los hombres no se dejaron intimidar por la amenaza de desalojo. Sin embargo, les preocupa incumplir la orden de no encender fuego en la playa, pero aceptan que podría ser necesario si quieren comer comida caliente.

Será pescado capturado en el mar, en lugar de los gigantescos cangrejos cocoteros nativos de la isla, lo que los hombres cocinarán.

Advertisement

“Es curioso decir que estamos en nuestra tierra. Vinieron a ver nuestro barco, pero al principio no desembarcaron. Después de unas horas, simplemente se acercaron a nosotros en la playa y nos dieron los papeles. Les dijimos: “Somos los dueños de estas islas”, contó el premier.

“Soy el primer ministro de Chagos. Fui elegido en diciembre y vivimos aquí en paz. No queremos causar problemas. También respetamos el medio ambiente. Están entregando una orden de desalojo al primer ministro de este país. Dijo que tenía que seguir el procedimiento. Pero fueron amables, no fueron agresivos ni nada por el estilo”, contó.

El impasse marca la primera escaramuza en una batalla burocrática y legal, que podría prolongarse durante semanas o meses.

Advertisement

Esto apenas parece preocupar a estos isleños, quienes en una pequeña plataforma recorrieron 3.200 kilómetros del Océano Índico para regresar a casa.Tras el primer encuentro playero de los isleños con la burocracia británica, los agentes de policía regresaron el miércoles por la tarde.Regresaron “con intenciones más serias” y órdenes de deportación, exigiendo a los chagosianos que abandonaran la isla.

“Regresaron después de que Londres se hubiera movilizado. Así que presumiblemente consultaron con el Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores”, dijo el Sr. Holloway.“Nos dieron estas órdenes de desalojo”

Advertisement

¿Qué quiere el gobierno de Donald Trump?

Desde hace mucho tiempo existe confusión sobre la postura exacta de la administración Trump respecto al acuerdo de las Islas Chagos.

Desde que Sir Keir Starmer alcanzó un acuerdo que obligaría al Reino Unido a pagar miles de millones para ceder la base militar clave de Diego García a Mauricio y luego, arrendarla de nuevo por 100 años, los funcionarios británicos han insistido en que contaban con el apoyo estadounidense.

Advertisement

Sin embargo, los políticos de la oposición le decían a cualquiera que los escuchara que el acuerdo era perjudicial para el presidente Trump y sus aliados.

Donald Trump entró en la disputa por la isla de Chagos. Foto: BLOOMBERG

“Un gran error»

Tras mensajes contradictorios en los últimos meses, el presidente Trump finalmente ofreció algo de claridad el miércoles. En Truth Social, describió el acuerdo como «un gran error» atribuido a la «política laborista, » que sería una «lacra para nuestro Gran Aliado». Esta dura crítica pone en grave peligro el plan de Starmer.

El acuerdo ha sido durante mucho tiempo una estrategia complicada para la Casa Blanca, donde se han mantenido conversaciones entre bastidores entre quienes luchan por él y quienes desean destruirlo.

Advertisement

Desde su concepción, el Reino Unido sabía que podría ser difícil. Si bien no todos en el gobierno británico estuvieron de acuerdo con la solución, existía un consenso generalizado sobre la importancia de la base militar para la relación especial. Es una de las principales contribuciones de Gran Bretaña a la seguridad estadounidense.

Islas Chagos. / Archivo Clarín

La importancia de la isla Diego García

John Gunther Dean, ex embajador de Washington en la India, describió en una ocasión a la isla de Diego García como crucial para «la estrategia global estadounidense de estar militarmente presente en todos los rincones del planeta».

Antes del regreso de Trump, los diplomáticos trabajaban para acordar rápidamente partes del acuerdo, temiendo un resultado peor si no lo asumían.

Advertisement

Cuando Lord Mandelson asumió el cargo de embajador británico en Washington, se le encomendó la tarea de conseguir el apoyo de la administración, dialogando con funcionarios y líderes republicanos en el Capitolio.

El argumento era que si se desmentían el acuerdo, se pondrían en peligro las operaciones futuras. Esto pareció funcionar cuando Marco Rubio, el secretario de Estado, se pronunció a favor.

Rechazo en Gran Bretaña

Advertisement

Sin embargo, políticos británicos de la oposición con vínculos a la Casa Blanca han seguido presionando, utilizando sus contactos para presentar argumentos en su contra durante algún tiempo.

Entre los opositores más acérrimos con vínculos a Washington se encuentran políticos conservadores como Sir Iain Duncan Smith (quien estuvo allí este mes), la ex primera ministra Liz Truss y el líder reformista Nigel Farage.

Cuando Trump enfrentó las críticas británicas sobre Groenlandia, comenzó a criticar el acuerdo de Chagos. Fuentes cercanas a la administración Trump afirman que esto se debió “a un sentimiento de hipocresía por parte del Reino Unido”, por su intromisión y el deseo de desviar la atención de las amenazas arancelarias de Trump.

Advertisement

Desde entonces, se han intensificado los esfuerzos para presionar a la administración Trump para que endurezca la postura.

Fuentes reformistas afirman que Farage ha estado hablando con sus amigos en la administración Trump, numerosos secretarios de gabinete, durante toda la semana para cancelar el acuerdo.

Hubo confusión en este grupo a principios de semana, cuando el Departamento de Estado declaró que apoyaba la decisión del Reino Unido de «proceder con su acuerdo con Mauricio sobre el archipiélago de Chagos».

Advertisement

En cuanto a las opiniones de Trump, una de las razones por las que este gobierno -y figuras del anterior gobierno conservador británico- comenzaron a buscar un acuerdo fue el temor de que fuera insostenible reclamar unilateralmente las islas, cuando podrían enfrentarse a fallos legales de los tribunales de las Naciones Unidas que dictaran lo contrario.

Sin embargo, Trump ha dicho: “No necesito el derecho internacional” . Considera que la ONU es obsoleta y culpable de extralimitación. Por lo tanto, estos argumentos nunca iban a tener mucho peso en una administración que se basa en el mantra de “la fuerza es la razón”.

Es la venganza de Trump sobre la posición británica sobre Groenlandia y su defensa de su soberanía.

Advertisement

La base para atacar a Irán

Hay otro factor que ha centrado la atención en la administración. Trump está considerando tomar medidas en Irán.

Estados Unidos mantiene su mayor despliegue de fuerzas en la zona desde 2003. Si Trump presiona el botón, la isla Diego García se convertirá en una de las bases estratégicamente más importantes de Estados Unidos.

Advertisement

Si ataca Irán, los aviones B 52 deberán salir de la isla Diego Garcia, su gran presencia en Océano Indico.

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

GOP rips FISA court for tapping ex-Biden ‘disinformation’ lawyer to advise on surveillance

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Republican lawmakers called it «insane» that the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court appointed to a key advisory panel a lawyer with past ties to the Biden administration’s controversial Disinformation Governance Board.

Advertisement

Judges on the FISC appointed Jennifer Daskal this month to serve as an amicus curiae, meaning Daskal is now among a small group of lawyers designated to advise the secretive court, which approves warrants for federal authorities to surveil targets for foreign intelligence purposes. The GOP lawmakers say Daskal’s history with the disinformation board raises worries about her ability to discern whether warrants are appropriate.

«The same person who helped to build a board to censor American speech now advises judges on how to protect American liberties,» House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, told Fox News Digital in a statement. «That’s ridiculous — and exactly why Congress must continue our oversight.»

HOUSE PASSES FISA RENEWAL WITHOUT ADDED WARRANT MANDATE FOR US DATA

Advertisement

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, looks on during a hearing with the House Judiciary Committee in the Rayburn House Office Building on Sept. 3, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., echoed Jordan’s concerns, saying Daskal’s appointment was «insane» and calling for reforms to the FISC.

Schmitt shared a video of himself on X questioning Daskal during a hearing about what he called the Biden administration’s «censorship enterprise,» referencing Daskal’s role in aiming to dispel what the administration viewed as inaccurate information about COVID-19 masks and vaccines and information about election security.

Advertisement

FISC proceedings are classified and «ex parte,» meaning a judge reviews the federal government’s warrant application and the target of the warrant has no awareness of the proceedings. A judge reviewing the application can, however, turn to an amicus curiae to present counterpoints to the government’s application, meaning Daskal is among a handful of lawyers who could be tapped to argue against allowing the government to wiretap a person’s phones or otherwise surveil them.

FBI logo next to American flag

The logo of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is seen at the Los Angeles Federal Building after a news conference to provide an update on the investigation into a May 18, 2025, bombing at a fertility clinic in Palm Springs, California, on June 4, 2025, in Los Angeles.  (PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images)

Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the government has access to these powerful spy tools for foreign intelligence purposes, but it has sometimes, whether inadvertently or intentionally, improperly targeted U.S. citizens.

Building more guardrails into the legislation has long been a point of contention for privacy hawks. Republicans, in particular, became highly critical of the FISC after finding that the court approved the FBI’s warrant applications, which contained flimsy and inaccurate evidence, to surveil Trump campaign aide Carter Page beginning in 2016.

Advertisement

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, told the Washington Free Beacon, which first reported on Daskal’s appointment, that the «American people need to have confidence in the people tasked to serve as amici» before the FISC. Grassley pointed to a bill he introduced, the FISA Accountability Act, which would allow Congress to have a say in who is chosen as an amicus curiae.

Jordan and Grassley have been some of the most vocal proponents of reining in the federal government’s use of FISA after identifying instances in recent years of intelligence officials allegedly abusing their authority and infringing on U.S. citizens’ Fourth Amendment right to privacy. In the case of Page, DOJ inspector general Michael Horowitz released a report in 2019 that identified more than a dozen «significant errors or omissions» across the FBI’s four warrant applications used to surveil the former Trump aide. Daskal, in her new role, could offer confidential, weighty legal arguments to a FISC judge that support or oppose intelligence officials’ requests to surveil someone.

Sen. Grassley

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, is seen in the U.S. Capitol during votes related to the government shutdown on Thursday, October 16, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Daskal served as a top lawyer in the Department of Homeland Security when she helped launch the Disinformation Governance Board. Conservatives heavily criticized it, describing the board as a «Ministry of Truth» that sought to censor their viewpoints in violation of the First Amendment.

Advertisement

Daskal chartered the board, while Nina Jankowicz was named its executive director, an appointment that fueled Republicans’ fury over it after finding Jankowicz’ past social media posts that they said revealed she was too partisan. Jankowicz, for instance, cast doubt on the New York Post’s bombshell story in 2020 about Hunter Biden’s laptop, which she said fit a pattern of Russian «information laundering.» Biden administration officials vehemently objected to the claims in the New York Post’s story about Joe Biden’s handling of Ukrainian foreign policy, though the authenticity of the laptop itself has been verified through court proceedings.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Republicans put so much pressure on DHS about the board — calling it an «abuse of taxpayer dollars» and raising alarm that it painted policy disagreements over COVID-19, election security and immigration as mis- or dis- information — that it disbanded just a few months after its launch.

Advertisement

In Daskal’s hearing exchange with Schmitt, Daskal said «it’s not appropriate for the government to censor any points of view.» Daskal did not respond to a request for comment for this story.

fbi,judiciary,congress

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Russia urges Iran, ‘all parties’ in Middle East to show restraint amid US military buildup

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Russia warned Iran and «all parties in the region to exercise restraint and caution» Thursday amid a U.S. military buildup in the Middle East. 

Advertisement

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov made the remark as the world’s largest aircraft carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford, and its strike group are moving from the Caribbean toward the Middle East. 

«Russia continues to develop relations with Iran, and in doing so, we call on our Iranian friends and all parties in the region to exercise restraint and caution, and we urge them to prioritize political and diplomatic means in resolving any problems,» Peskov said Thursday, according to Reuters. 

«Right now, we are indeed seeing an unprecedented escalation of tensions in the region. But we still expect that political and diplomatic means and negotiations will continue to prevail in the search for a settlement,» he added.

Advertisement

WORLD’S LARGEST AIRCRAFT CARRIER HEADS TO MIDDLE EAST AS IRAN NUCLEAR TENSIONS SPIKE DRAMATICALLY

A F-18E fighter jet takes off from aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford as it sails during NATO Neptune Strike 2025 exercise on Sept. 24, 2025, in the North Sea. (Jonathan Klein/AFP via Getty Images)

The move of the USS Gerald R. Ford would place two aircraft carriers and their accompanying warships in the region. The USS Abraham Lincoln and three guided-missile destroyers arrived in the Middle East more than two weeks ago. 

Advertisement

Negotiations between the United States and Iran over the latter’s nuclear program advanced Tuesday toward what Tehran described as the beginning of a potential framework, but sharp public divisions between the two sides underscored how far apart they remain. 

IRAN FIRES LIVE MISSILES INTO STRAIT OF HORMUZ AS TRUMP ENVOYS ARRIVE FOR NUCLEAR TALKS

the USS Gerald Ford

The USS Gerald R. Ford is heading toward the Middle East as tensions with Iran escalate and President Donald Trump demands full nuclear dismantlement.  (Jonathan Klein/AFP via Getty Images)

Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said the two sides reached a «general agreement on a number of guiding principles» and agreed to begin drafting text for a possible agreement, with plans to exchange drafts and schedule a third round of talks.  

Advertisement

Yet Washington has publicly insisted that any agreement must result in the dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program — including its enrichment capacity — along with limits on Tehran’s ballistic missile program and an end to its support for allied militant groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah.

USS Gerald R. Ford travels in North Sea

The world’s largest aircraft carrier, USS Gerald R. Ford, is seen in the North Sea during NATO Neptune Strike 2025 exercise in September 2025. (Jonathan Klein/AFP via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Those demands go well beyond temporary enrichment pauses or technical adjustments. 

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Greg Wehner and Morgan Phillips contributed to this report. 



iran,russia,military,nuclear proliferation,middle east,world

Continue Reading

Tendencias