Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Ted Cruz says hate speech ‘absolutely’ protected by First Amendment following Charlie Kirk’s assassination

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said on Tuesday that a person cannot be prosecuted for speech, but he is in favor of other consequences for those who celebrate the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, putting the senator at odds with the Trump administration.

Advertisement

Cruz made the comments at Politico’s AI & Tech Summit on Tuesday, when he affirmed that hate speech is protected under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.

«The First Amendment absolutely protects speech,» Cruz said.

«It absolutely protects hate speech,» he continued. «It protects vile speech. It protects horrible speech. What does that mean? It means you cannot be prosecuted for speech, even if it is evil and bigoted and wrong.»

Advertisement

PAM BONDI CLARIFIES ‘HATE SPEECH’ COMMENTS AFTER GETTING BLOWBACK

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said a person cannot be prosecuted for speech. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)

Instead of facing prosecution, Cruz said anyone who has celebrated Kirk’s murder, or suggested that he deserved to die for his political views, should be met with other forms of consequences, such as termination or expulsion. Several people in various jobs across the country have been fired for comments made in response to Kirk’s death.

Advertisement

«We have seen, as you noted, across the country, people on the left — not everybody — but far too many people celebrating Charlie Kirk’s murder,» Cruz said. «We’ve seen teachers in high schools and elementary schools posting online celebrating. We’ve seen university professors posting.»

«In my view, they should absolutely face the consequences for celebrating murder,» he added.

Cruz’s comments come after Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Monday that the Justice Department would target people who engaged in hate speech following Kirk’s assassination.

Advertisement

«There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society. We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech,» Bondi told podcast host Katie Miller, the wife of White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller.

BONDI ‘HATE SPEECH’ REMARKS SPARK TORRENT OF CRITICISM FROM CONSERVATIVES

Attorney General Pam Bondi

Attorney General Pam Bondi said she would target people who engaged in hate speech following Charlie Kirk’s assassination before later attempting to walk back her statement. (Francis Chung/Politico/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Bondi later attempted to walk back her comments, saying hate speech «that crosses the line into threats of violence is NOT protected by the First Amendment.»

Advertisement

«It’s a crime,» she wrote on X. «For far too long, we’ve watched the radical left normalize threats, call for assassinations, and cheer on political violence. That era is over.»

«Free speech protects ideas, debate, even dissent, but it does NOT and will NEVER protect violence,» she added. «It is clear this violent rhetoric is designed to silence others from voicing conservative ideals. We will never be silenced. Not for our families, not for our freedoms, and never for Charlie. His legacy will not be erased by fear or intimidation.»

Asked about Bondi’s initial comments, President Donald Trump suggested potentially going after journalists who «treat me unfairly.»

Advertisement

«It’s hate,» he told reporters.

Charlie Kirk speaks to the audience just before he was shot

Charlie Kirk speaks before he is shot during Turning Point’s visit to Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. (Tess Crowley/The Deseret News via AP)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Kirk, who was shot and killed during an event on the campus of Utah Valley University last week, was opposed to prosecuting hate speech.

Advertisement

«Hate speech does not exist legally in America,» he wrote on X last year. «There’s ugly speech. There’s gross speech. There’s evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment. Keep America free.»

In his remarks on Tuesday, Cruz pushed for more «naming and shaming,» citing English philosopher John Stuart Mill, who argued that the best response to speech is more speech.

«And naming and shaming is part of a functioning and vibrant democracy,» Cruz said.

Advertisement

ted cruz,charlie kirk,pam bondi,first amendment,personal freedoms,politics,crime world

INTERNACIONAL

GOP lawmaker shocked after anti-ICE sheriff was stumped by ‘fifth-grade civics’ question

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

North Carolina Republican state Rep. Allen Chesser said he was taken by surprise when a Democratic sheriff who has long opposed cooperating with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) could not answer a basic question about how the government works.

Advertisement

A North Carolina House Oversight Committee hearing spurred on by the recent killing of a young Ukrainian woman, Iryna Zarutska, in Charlotte, took an unexpected turn when Chesser asked Mecklenburg County Sheriff Garry McFadden, «What branch of government do you operate under?»

McFadden, who is the top law enforcement officer in the county where Zarutska was killed, simply answered, «Mecklenburg County,» prompting Chesser to repeat, «What branch of government do you operate under, sheriff?»

The sheriff answered, «The Constitution of the United States,» to which Chesser responded, «That is what establishes the branches of government; I’m asking what branch you fall under.»

Advertisement

After McFadden answered, «Mecklenburg County» again, Chesser remarked, «This is not where I was anticipating getting stuck. Um, are you aware of how many branches of government there are?» The sheriff quickly shot back, «No.»

CHARLOTTE LIGHT-RAIL STABBING MURDER SPURS LANDMARK CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM FROM NORTH CAROLINA REPUBLICANS

Left: The skyline of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, which sits in Mecklenburg County. Right: Sheriff Garry McFadden. (Andrea Evangelo-Giamou / EyeEm via Getty Images; The Mecklenburg County Sheriff’s Office/Facebook)

Advertisement

After a long pause, Chesser continued, «For the sake of debate, let’s say there are three branches of government: legislative, executive, judicial. Of those three, which do you fall under?»

The sheriff answered, «I believe I fall under the last one … judicial.»

«You are incorrect, sir. You fall under the executive,» said Chesser.

Advertisement

After that, Chesser continued to press McFadden about how he reconciles his responsibility as an officer under the executive branch to enforce the law with his opposition to cooperation with ICE. Chesser asked McFadden how he reconciled his responsibility with a previous statement in which the sheriff said, «We do not have a role in enforcement whatsoever, we do not have to follow the rules and the laws that are governed by our lawmakers in Raleigh.»

The sheriff said that Chesser was taking his quote out of context, saying it was strictly in reference to immigration enforcement.

Though declining to offer more context on the statement, McFadden affirmed his office is now abiding by state law requiring cooperation with ICE, saying, «We follow the law, when the law is produced, we follow the law.»

Advertisement

HOUSE DEM EXPLODES ON TOP TRUMP IMMIGRATION OFFICIAL, SAYS HE ‘BETTER HOPE’ FOR PARDON FROM PRESIDENT

Iryna Zarutska curls up in fear

Iryna Zarutska curls up in fear as a man looms over her during a disturbing attack on a Charlotte, N.C., light rail train. (NewsNation via Charlotte Area Transit System)

In an interview with Fox News Digital the day after the hearing, Chesser, who is an Army veteran and former police officer, said that, «Obviously, those weren’t the cache of questions that I was thinking we were going to get him on.»

«I had several statements that he had made to the media and to the local press and in different interviews that kind of conflicted with some of the testimony that he provided yesterday about following the law. We made it to [only] one of those statements because we got held up on what I thought was baseline, just kind of setting a baseline of how we were to establish that his role is to enforce the law,» he explained, adding, «I was not expecting to have to get into a fifth-grade civics lesson with a duly elected sheriff.»

Advertisement

He said that McFadden has «decided to make himself kind of a centerpiece in the refusal to enforce immigration law here in North Carolina,» adding, «It’s not so much the refusal to enforce immigration law, but it’s the refusal to enforce state law that says he must cooperate with ICE and ICE detainers when people are in custody in his facilities.»

WHO IS IRYNA ZARUTSKA, UKRAINIAN REFUGEE KILLED IN CHARLOTTE TRAIN ATTACK?

Iryna Zarutska

Ukrainian Iryna Zarutska came to the U.S. to escape war but was stabbed to death in Charlotte. (Evgeniya Rush/GoFundMe)

«Last summer, we had the unfortunate death of a young Ukrainian national that had sought refuge in our country and in our state,» Chesser went on. «I think that all North Carolinians, and all people who find themselves in North Carolina, should be able to count on one thing when it comes to public safety, and that is whether or not you are safe and whether or not the law will be enforced is not dependent on what county you find yourself in.»

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«North Carolina is a safe state for all the people who choose to come here, and that is the point of the Oversight Committee [hearing] that we were having was, making sure that the law is equally applied and fairly applied across all imaginary lines in our state,» he said.

The Mecklenburg County Sheriff’s Office did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment. 

Advertisement

democratic party,immigration,enforcement,north carolina,charlotte raleigh piedmont,police and law enforcement,migrant crime

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Zelenskyy plans major announcement on presidential election, referendum: report

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is reportedly planning to announce a presidential election and a referendum on a potential peace deal to end the war with Russia, with the declaration expected on Feb. 24, the fourth anniversary of Moscow’s full-scale invasion.

Advertisement

The Financial Times, citing Ukrainian and European officials involved in the planning, reported on Wednesday that both a presidential vote, in which Zelenskyy would seek re-election, and a nationwide referendum could be held by May 15.

The outlet said Kyiv could risk losing proposed U.S. security guarantees if it does not hold both votes by that date.

The Financial Times noted that although earlier U.S.-imposed deadlines have come and gone, American officials are this time applying heavier pressure on Ukraine as the November midterm elections loom.

Advertisement

ZELENSKYY READY TO PRESENT NEW PEACE PROPOSALS TO US AND RUSSIA AFTER WORKING WITH EUROPEAN TALKS

A note marks a ballot box for voters with high temperatures at a polling station during the 2020 Ukrainian local elections in Rubizhne, Luhansk Region, eastern Ukraine, on Oct. 25, 2020, amid the coronavirus pandemic. (Kovalyov Oleksiy/Ukrinform/Future Publishing via Getty Images)

It added that the timeline could also be complicated by the wide gap between Moscow and Kyiv on key territorial issues, including control of the Donbas region and the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, as well as the need for parliament to amend legislation because martial law currently bars national elections during wartime.

Advertisement

Zelenskyy previously stressed that the timing and format of any elections are matters solely for Ukraine and its citizens, rejecting any suggestion that the Kremlin could dictate the process. 

In several lengthy posts on X in December, he argued that two key factors would determine whether voting is possible: security and legislation.

ZELENSKYY SAYS US SECURITY GUARANTEES DOCUMENT IS ‘100% READY’ FOR SIGNING

Advertisement
A voter places her ballot into a portable ballot box inside a temporary polling setup in a conflict-affected area.

A woman casts her ballot at a mobile polling station during early voting in Russia’s presidential election in Donetsk, Russian-occupied Ukraine, on March 14, 2024. (Stringer/AFP via Getty Images)

Zelenskyy said voting can only take place on Ukrainian-controlled territory and must ensure the participation of soldiers defending the country. Elections cannot be held in Russian-occupied areas, he explained, because of concerns over how they would be conducted.

He also suggested that a ceasefire, at least for the duration of an election or referendum, may be necessary to guarantee secure conditions, including protected airspace and the presence of international observers.

The reported deadline from the Trump administration comes after The Associated Press reported that Washington is aiming for the war to end by June.

Advertisement
Uniformed soldiers stand inside a polling station as they take part in the voting process.

Ukrainian servicemen vote at a polling station during Ukraine’s parliamentary elections in Velyki Mosty, Lviv Oblast, on July 21, 2019. (Mykola Tys/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images)

Trilateral talks between the United States, Russia and Ukraine were held in Abu Dhabi in early February, where the sides met twice but emerged with only a limited breakthrough — agreeing to a 314-person prisoner exchange, the first such swap in five months.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff said Washington and Moscow agreed to reestablish a military-to-military dialogue, calling the channel «crucial to achieving and maintaining peace.»

Advertisement

He said trilateral discussions would continue in the coming weeks after the delegations report back to their respective capitals.



ukraine,russia,world

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Rusia apagó la calefacción. Así que durmió en una carpa sobre su cama

Published

on


KIEV, Ucrania — Svitlana Zinovieva limpió la condensación helada de la ventana de su sala y señaló una chimenea que salía de una caldera central que calentaba su bloque de departamentos.

Allí, a lo lejos, había visto un misil ruso entrar y explotar unos días antes.

Advertisement

“Fue como un espectáculo de fuegos artificiales”, dijo.

“Pero sabía que pronto haría frío”.

Poco después, el frío intenso del invierno más frío en una década en Kiev, la capital ucraniana, se filtraba en su departamento.

Advertisement

Zinovieva adoptó rápidamente nuevas rutinas, como innumerables otros ucranianos que lidian con los implacables ataques de Rusia a los sistemas de calefacción y electricidad de su país.

Sin electricidad y con la heladera inservible, un balcón acristalado se convirtió en su congelador a medida que bajaban las temperaturas.

Antes de acostarse, Zinovieva, de 73 años, cineasta jubilada, calentó agua en una estufa para llenar botellas de vino vacías.

Advertisement

Las colocó dentro de una tienda de campaña montada sobre su cama.

Luego se metió, por fin caliente.

“Es realmente muy acogedor”, dijo sobre la tienda de campaña interior.

Advertisement

Los ucranianos han presenciado avances y reveses en el campo de batalla, han dormido en sótanos, han llorado a sus muertos y han lamentado la pérdida de Estados Unidos como aliado confiable.

Ahora se acercan al cuarto aniversario de la invasión total de Rusia, abrigados en sus casas con suéteres, ropa interior larga y varios pares de medias.

Las oleadas de ataques rusos con misiles y drones explosivos contra la infraestructura energética de Ucrania no solo generan malestar.

Advertisement

También buscan paralizar la economía ucraniana y desmoralizar a la población, incluso sembrando divisiones internas.

Además, intensifican la presión sobre Ucrania durante las conversaciones de paz mediadas por la administración Trump.

El Kremlin intentó por primera vez someter a Ucrania en 2006 y 2010, interrumpiendo los envíos de gas natural en invierno.

Advertisement

Si bien la disputa se centraba aparentemente en los precios, la intención era presionar al gobierno de tendencia occidental del momento.

Moscú lo intentó de nuevo con ataques con misiles durante los tres primeros inviernos después de su invasión en febrero de 2022.

Este año, una serie de ataques que comenzaron el 4 de enero finalmente congelaron Kiev.

Advertisement

Objetivos

El lunes, tras los últimos bombardeos, unos 1.400 edificios de departamentos en Kiev se quedaron sin calefacción, según informó el presidente ucraniano, Volodymyr Zelensky.

Las temperaturas nocturnas del lunes descendieron a -20 grados.

Advertisement

En un momento dado de enero, aproximadamente la mitad de los 3 millones de habitantes de la ciudad se quedaron sin calefacción, según el alcalde, Vitali Klitschko.

La Comisión Internacional Independiente de Investigación sobre Ucrania, una rama de las Naciones Unidas que investiga las violaciones de derechos humanos, consideró crímenes de guerra los ataques rusos previos contra plantas de calefacción y electricidad.

La Corte Penal Internacional ha acusado a un exministro de defensa ruso y a tres generales por atacar infraestructura civil.

Advertisement
Volodymyr Matveyev calienta a su padre de 99 años colocando bolsas de agua caliente en su cama en Kiev, Ucrania, el 31 de enero de 2026.  (Lynsey Addario/The New York Times)

Aunque los residentes de Kiev viven en una ciudad moderna y extensa, la experiencia para quienes viven en los edificios más afectados no es muy distinta a la de acampar en un desierto urbano helado.

Los residentes se las arreglan solos para encontrar calefacción, electricidad y agua.

Algunos departamentos llevan semanas sin esos servicios básicos.

En la mayoría de los barrios, algún servicio falla durante horas o días antes de ser restaurado.

Advertisement

En una docena de entrevistas en sus apartamentos a oscuras, algunos residentes de Kiev se mantuvieron desafiantes, afirmando que soportarían cualquier dificultad necesaria para evitar la capitulación ante Moscú.

Para otros, el ánimo hacia los propios líderes ucranianos se ha deteriorado.

Vidas

Advertisement

Natalia Kazak, de 76 años, no tenía luz, calefacción ni estufa.

Se sentaba envuelta en suéteres para abrigarse.

Depende de la amabilidad de sus vecinos, que le traen comida caliente y agua caliente para el té.

Advertisement

Cuando le preguntaron cómo estaba, rompió a llorar.

«No pensé que llegaría a una vejez como esta», dijo.

«Por favor, no te olvides de nosotros».

Advertisement

Las adaptaciones abundan.

Tetiana Keleinikova, de 72 años, se despierta a la 1 de la mañana para hornear en su horno eléctrico.

Solo tiene electricidad durante la noche, durante unas horas.

Advertisement

Su edificio no tiene ascensor, así que no puede bajar al sótano durante las alertas antiaéreas.

En cambio, se sienta en un pasillo y vigila, dejando que sus nietos duerman.

“Por la ventana, los veo disparar”, dijo sobre los duelos nocturnos entre el fuego antiaéreo y los misiles y drones que se aproximaban.

Advertisement

“Oigo los cohetes sobrevolar. Me quedo sentada en silencio. Los niños duermen y yo estoy de guardia”.

Mientras funcionarios ucranianos mantienen conversaciones con delegaciones rusas y estadounidenses sobre un fin negociado de la guerra, ella dijo:

«Lo esperamos todos los días».

Advertisement

Lidia Prylypkova, de 87 años, recordó haber vivido en un sótano de niña durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial.

Dijo que le ofendía que Rusia ahora se apropiara de la victoria sobre la Alemania nazi.

«Piensen en cuántos ucranianos también lucharon» en esa guerra, dijo. Ucrania, añadió, debería ahora seguir luchando contra Rusia.

Advertisement

—No te detengas —dijo, cojeando por su gélido apartamento en pantuflas y varias capas de batas—. No te retires ni de un solo pueblo. No se lo merecen.

Volodymyr Matveyev, de 68 años, asesor jubilado de un ministro del gobierno ucraniano, calienta a su padre de 99 años colocándole bolsas de agua caliente en la cama.

Sí, dijo, Rusia era la culpable de volar centrales eléctricas.

Advertisement

Pero Zelenskyy, dijo, era el culpable de no defenderlas.

“Entendemos que es una guerra y todo eso”, dijo Matveyev.

“Pero los burócratas son corruptos y la gente no quiere trabajar. Si no entiendes eso, no entiendes nada de este país”.

Advertisement

Mientras el frío azotaba la ciudad, Zelensky culpó al alcalde, Klitschko, un antiguo rival político, por no haber preparado sistemas de calefacción y electricidad de emergencia. Klitschko afirmó que la ciudad estaba instalando tres generadores eléctricos en parques.

No todos soportaban el frío con tranquilidad.

Haciendo selfies durante la rave. «Es muy importante levantar el ánimo para que la gente quiera seguir viviendo», dijo uno de los asistentes a la fiesta.

En un estacionamiento y sobre el hielo del río Dniéper, durante el fin de semana, los jóvenes dieron vueltas, zapatearon y gritaron, desafiando las gélidas condiciones con una fiesta rave al aire libre.

“Esto es mejor que quedarse en casa llorando, por así decirlo”, dijo Anastasia Bychkovska, de 28 años, que vino a bailar con una colega del salón de uñas donde trabaja.

Advertisement

Un asistente a la fiesta apareció disfrazado de pingüino.

Otra, Ella Ponomorenko, dijo: «La guerra quita la vida».

“Es muy importante levantar el ánimo para que la gente quiera seguir viviendo”, añadió.

Advertisement

Zinovieva vigilaba de cerca la chimenea que se veía desde su ventana.

El vapor traería buenas noticias.

Los residentes de su edificio habían utilizado un chat en línea para organizar esfuerzos para verter agua calentada por la estufa en los desagües de las bañeras cada hora, incluso durante la noche, para evitar que las tuberías estallaran.

Advertisement

Equipos de reparación habían venido de todo el país y trabajaron en la planta sin descanso.

El sábado, apareció vapor. Volvió a funcionar.

«Cruzo los dedos», dijo Zinovieva.

Advertisement

c.2026 The New York Times Company

Continue Reading

Tendencias