Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Tras la cumbre entre Donald Trump y Vladimir Putin, Rusia atacó a la población ucraniana con 85 drones y un misil

Published

on


Un edificio con importantes daños tras un nuevo ataque ruso en Donetsk (REUTERS/Alexander Ermochenko)

El ejército ruso lanzó 85 drones y un misil contra Ucrania durante la noche del viernes al sábado, informó Kiev, luego de que se celebrara en Alaska la reunión entre el presidente Vladimir Putin y su homólogo estadounidense, Donald Trump.

La fuerza aérea ucraniana, en un comunicado publicado en Telegram, afirmó que derribó 61 de esos drones, entre los que había aparatos de tipo “Shahed” (de diseño iraní) y dispositivos señuelo.

Advertisement

Las regiones impactadas fueron Sumi (nordeste), Donetsk (este), Chernihiv (norte) y Dnipropetrovsk (centro-este), precisó la misma fuente.

El ejército ruso atacó Donetsk
El ejército ruso atacó Donetsk tras la cumbre entre Donald Trump y Vladimir Putin (REUTERS/Alexander Ermochenko)

En el frente, las fuerzas ucranianas, menos numerosas y peor equipadas, llevan meses a la defensiva frente a las tropas rusas, que ganan terreno poco a poco.

El ejército ruso afirmó este sábado haber conquistado la localidad ucraniana de Kolodiazi, en el norte de la región de Donetsk, así como la de Voroné, en la región de Dnipropetrovsk, recientemente alcanzada por las fuerzas del Kremlin.

De momento, Kiev y los analistas militares ucranianos del sitio web Deepstate, cercano al ejército, no han confirmado estos avances.

Advertisement
Equipos de rescate trabajan en
Equipos de rescate trabajan en un edificio en Donetsk tras un nuevo ataque ruso (REUTERS/Alexander Ermochenko)

Estos ataques tuvieron lugar luego de que se llevara a cabo en Alaska el esperado encuentro entre Putin y Trump para intentar poner fin a la guerra, pero que de momento no resultó en ninguna tregua.

El mandatario estadounidense indicó que quiere organizar rápidamente una cumbre tripartita con Putin y su par ucraniano, Volodimir Zelensky, para lograr un alto al fuego.

La guerra desencadenada por la invasión rusa de Ucrania en febrero de 2022 es el conflicto más sangriento en Europa desde la Segunda Guerra Mundial, y causó decenas de miles de muertos.

Rescatistas dentro de un edificio
Rescatistas dentro de un edificio que fue alcanzado por un ataque ruso en Donetsk (REUTERS/Alexander Ermochenko)

Por su parte, la presidenta de la Comisión Europea, Ursula von der Leyen; junto al presidente del Consejo Europeo, António Costa; y otros seis líderes europeos, expresaron en una declaración conjunta su disposición a participar en una cumbre trilateral con el presidente estadounidense Donald Trump, el mandatario ucraniano Volodimir Zelensky y el presidente ruso Vladimir Putin. Y advirtieron que Rusia “no puede vetar” el ingreso de Ucrania en la Unión Europea y la OTAN.

En palabras de los líderes: “Tal y como prevé el presidente Trump, el siguiente paso debe ser ahora continuar las conversaciones, incluyendo al presidente Zelensky, con quien se reunirá próximamente. También estamos dispuestos a colaborar con el presidente Trump y el presidente Zelensky para celebrar una cumbre trilateral con el apoyo de Europa”.

Advertisement

Entre los firmantes de la declaración figuran el presidente francés Emmanuel Macron, la primera ministra italiana Giorgia Meloni, el canciller alemán Friedrich Merz, el primer ministro británico Keir Starmer, el presidente finlandés Alexander Stubb y el primer ministro polaco Donald Tusk.

El presidente francés, Emmanuel Macron;
El presidente francés, Emmanuel Macron; el canciller alemán, Friedrich Merz; y el primer ministro británico Keir Starmer (Europa Press)

La reunión sostenida entre Trump y Putin este viernes en Alaska concluyó sin acuerdo sobre un cese de hostilidades en Ucrania. Ambos líderes resaltaron su buena relación, y Trump describió el encuentro como “extremadamente productivo”.

Tras esa reunión, Trump mantuvo una conversación telefónica el sábado por la mañana con Zelensky y líderes europeos, entre ellos Von der Leyen, para informarles sobre lo tratado con Putin.

La declaración de los europeos señala: “Los líderes acogieron con satisfacción los esfuerzos del presidente Trump por detener la matanza en Ucrania, poner fin a la guerra de agresión de Rusia y lograr una paz justa y duradera”.

Advertisement

Añaden que “Ucrania debe contar con garantías de seguridad inquebrantables para defender eficazmente su soberanía e integridad territorial. Acogemos con satisfacción la declaración del presidente Trump de que Estados Unidos está dispuesto a ofrecer garantías de seguridad“.

La Coalición de los Dispuestos, formada por 31 países que prometieron aumentar el apoyo a Ucrania, “está preparada para desempeñar un papel activo”, y señala además que “no deben imponerse limitaciones a las fuerzas armadas de Ucrania ni a su cooperación con terceros países. Rusia no puede vetar el camino de Ucrania hacia la UE y la OTAN”.



Europe,Military Conflicts,DONETSK

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Turkey’s NATO role under scrutiny amid new report on Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood ties

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FIRST ON FOX: A new report is raising concerns about Turkey’s role in the Middle East, arguing that under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the country has moved away from its traditional Western alignment and toward deeper engagement with Islamist movements, including the Muslim Brotherhood.

Advertisement

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies report, led by senior fellow Sinan Ciddi and titled «Islamist Domination of Turkey: A Forward Base for Muslim Brotherhood-Aligned Jihadism,» argues that Turkey has ties to Hamas — the U.S.-designated terrorist group responsible for the Oct. 7 massacre — as well as to the Muslim Brotherhood — an Islamist movement whose affiliates have recently been designated as terrorist organizations by the United States — placing Turkey’s policies under renewed scrutiny as it prepares to host a NATO summit.

Ciddi told Fox News Digital the shift reflects a broader transformation in how Turkey defines threats.

«What we have is Turkey has completely rewritten the rules of how you interpret what a jihadist terrorist entity may be,» Ciddi said. «Erdoğan has reinvented what is interpreted as a terrorist entity … groups such as Hamas or al-Nusra fall into line with his pan-Islamist view of the world.»

Advertisement

EXPERT WARNS RADICAL ISLAMIST NETWORKS COULD SHIFT WEST AFTER IRAN REGIME SHAKEUP

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (R) and then-Chairman of Hamas Khaled Mashal (L) shake hands at the Historical Mabeyn Palace in Istanbul, Turkey on June 24, 2016. (Kayhan Ozer/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images)

Hamas presence draws scrutiny

A central focus of the report is Turkey’s relationship with Hamas, which the United States designates as a terrorist organization, and yet Hamas expanded its presence in Turkey after 2011, establishing offices and networks inside the country.

Advertisement

«From 2011 onward … Hamas used this opportunity inside of Turkey with a friendly government to establish offices, engage in recruitment (and) fundraising,» Ciddi said.

U.S. authorities have taken action against some of those networks. The Treasury Department has designated Hamas-linked individuals and entities operating in Turkey, a point Ciddi said underscores longstanding concerns.

«The United States Treasury has been tracking and designating Hamas-affiliated NGOs and individuals inside of Turkey,» he said.

Advertisement

The report also alleges that some Hamas operatives have been able to travel using Turkish-issued documents and that senior figures have been publicly received by Erdoğan.

Beyond Hamas, the report describes Turkey as a hub for Muslim Brotherhood figures from across the region, including Egypt and Yemen, many of whom relocated there following crackdowns in their home countries.

Across parts of the Arab world, the Muslim Brotherhood has been banned or restricted for years. 

Advertisement

Egypt outlawed the movement in 2013, accusing it of inciting unrest and undermining state institutions. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates later designated it a terrorist organization, describing it as a threat to national stability, while Bahrain adopted a similar stance. 

Jordan dissolved its local chapter this year following arrests authorities said were linked to illicit weapons activity.

Some European countries also have taken steps targeting networks linked to the movement. 

Advertisement

Austria, for example, has pursued legal action against individuals and organizations it says are connected to Brotherhood-linked activity as part of its counter-extremism policies.

Officials in these countries have argued that the Brotherhood operates through a mix of religious outreach, political activism, charitable organizations and media platforms to influence public opinion and challenge state authority.

ISRAEL SHUTS DOOR ON TURKEY IN GAZA AS TRUMP PRAISES ERDOGAN, PLAYS DOWN CLASH

Advertisement
Turkey protest

People protest in support of Palestinians in Gaza during a protest rally in Istanbul, Turkey, on Feb. 17, 2024, amid the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas. (Khalil Hamra/The Associated Press )

Syria policy and sanctions questions

The report also examines Turkey’s role in Syria, where the country backed opposition forces during the civil war, supporting a range of armed factions, including groups that later formed the Syrian National Army.

«The Syrian National Army … was a hodgepodge collection of militias that Turkey directly armed, paid and organized,» he said.

The report links Turkish support to groups such as al-Nusra and Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, raising questions among analysts about whether such ties could expose Turkish officials to potential sanctions under U.S. law.

Advertisement

TRUMP FACES MIDDLE EAST TEST AS NETANYAHU BALKS AT ERDOGAN’S GAZA TROOP HOPES

Trump meets with Erdogan

U.S. President Donald Trump (R) delivers remarks during a meeting with President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan in the Oval Office at the White House on Sept. 25, 2025 in Washington, D.C. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

A balancing act with Washington

Despite these concerns, other analysts say Turkey’s relationship with the United States continues to act as a constraint on its behavior, while the relationship between Donald Trump and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has been characterized by renewed trust, with Trump praising Erdoğan’s role in Gaza diplomacy.

As Trump celebrated the Gaza ceasefire agreement in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt in October 2025, he singled out one leader for extraordinary praise — Erdoğan, whose leadership he credited for helping deliver the Gaza ceasefire.

Advertisement

«A guy who’s been a friend of mine for a long time. I don’t know why I like the tough people better than the soft, easy ones,» Trump said about Erdoğan at the Sharm el-Sheikh summit in October 2025. «This gentleman from a place called Turkey is one of the most powerful in the world … He’s a tough cookie — but he’s my friend.»

Hişyar Özsoy, a Turkish politician and academic, described the relationship between Erdoğan and Trump as «transactional,» noting Washington often relies on Turkey for regional coordination.

In a policy webinar hosted by the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security, Turkish academic Hüseyin Bağcı emphasized that Ankara remains closely tied to Washington.

Advertisement

«The Turkish state is not interested in fighting with Israel because the Turkish government has very good relations with (the) United States of America,» he said. «You cannot be good with America and then be in conflict with Israel.»

Bağcı also suggested Turkey has at times limited Islamist actors domestically.

«Today do you hear anything about» the Muslim Brotherhood, he said. «No … because the president said stop.» 

Advertisement
World leaders shaking hands

Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, left, shakes hands with Sweden’s Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, right, as NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg looks on prior to a meeting ahead of a NATO summit in Vilnius, Lithuania, Monday, July 10, 2023. (Yves Herman, Pool Photo via AP)

NATO ally under pressure

Turkey, a NATO member since 1952, remains a key partner for the United States, providing logistical access, military capabilities and diplomatic reach.

But Ciddi argued Turkey’s current trajectory increasingly diverges from alliance priorities.

«There is an established track record … where Turkey significantly undermines the transatlantic alliance’s core security concerns,» he said.

Advertisement

He pointed to U.S. sanctions on Turkish entities accused of supplying dual-use goods to Russia, as well as Ankara’s broader strategy of maintaining ties with competing powers.

Iran and regional positioning

As far as Turkey’s positioning itself amid tensions with Iran, Ciddi said Turkey is likely to favor a weakened Iranian regime rather than a complete collapse that could produce a more pro-Western government. 

«A weakened Iranian regime is Erdoğan’s safest bet,» he said.

Advertisement

Bağcı offered a similar assessment of the rivalry.

«Iran is not an enemy of Turkey, but not necessarily its best friend. Turkey and Iran are two regional competitors,» he said.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement
FILE - In this May 30, 2015, file photo, supporters of Turkey's president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and prime minister and leader of the Justice and Development Party (AKP), Ahmet Davutoglu, some holding Turkish flags, wait for their appearance in Istanbul during a rally to commemorate the anniversary of city's conquest by the Ottoman Turks. As extremist violence and political uncertainty cast a shadow over Turkey, voters are looking for the parliamentary election to usher in stability. (AP Photo/Lefteris Pitarakis file)

In this May 30, 2015, file photo, supporters of Turkey President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and prime minister and leader of the Justice and Development Party (AKP), Ahmet Davutoglu, some holding Turkish flags, wait for their appearance in Istanbul during a rally to commemorate the anniversary of the city’s conquest by the Ottoman Turks. As extremist violence and political uncertainty cast a shadow over Turkey, voters are looking for the parliamentary election to usher in stability. (AP Photo/Lefteris Pitarakis)

Looking ahead

The report recommends potential U.S. policy responses, including sanctions and increased scrutiny of Turkey’s financial system, steps that could reshape relations between Washington and Ankara.

Fox News Digital reached out multiple times to the Turkish government and to the State Department for comment but did not receive a response in time for publication.

Advertisement



war with iran, turkey, nato, europe, terrorism, syria

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Poll position: Where Trump stands among Americans as he faces the nation in primetime

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump goes before the nation in prime time on Wednesday evening to deliver what the White House says is «an important update» on the war with Iran.

Advertisement

The president’s address comes amid the month-long attacks by the U.S. and Israel on Iran, which polls indicate are unpopular with many Americans, and a surge in gas prices as a direct result of the fighting have triggered a further slide in Trump’s standing in public opinion surveys.

The political implications are clear: The strikes on Iran and the erosion of the president’s approval ratings are warning signs for the GOP as Republicans ramp up to defend their slim House and Senate majorities in this autumn’s midterm elections.

Trump stood at 41% approval and 59% disapproval in the latest Fox News national poll, which was conducted March 20–23. The president’s negative 18-point margin was up from 14 points in the previous Fox News poll, which was conducted Feb. 28–March 2, as the strikes against Iran began.

Advertisement

FOX NEWS LIVE UPDATES ON THE U.S. WAR WITH IRAN

The president’s approval ratings stood in the upper 30s, with his disapproval in the upper 50s to low 60s, in the most recent national surveys from Reuters/Ipsos, AP/NORC, and Quinnipiac University. A CNN poll conducted March 26–30 and released Wednesday indicated Trump had a 35%-64% approval/disapproval rating.

An average of the most recent national surveys gauging the president’s standing puts Trump just above 40%, with his disapproval in the upper 50s.

Advertisement

WHAT THE LATEST FOX NEWS POLL SHOWS ON THE WAR WITH IRAN

While Trump’s base remains extremely supportive of the president and the war, much of the slippage is coming from within the GOP, specifically those who are considered non-MAGA Republicans.

«I do see in the last couple of surveys an edging down…close to a double-digit movement,» veteran Republican pollster Daron Shaw, who helps run the Fox News Poll with Democrat Chris Anderson, said, pointing to declining support for Trump among non-MAGA Republicans.

Advertisement

A screen grab from a video released on U.S. President Donald Trump’s Truth Social account shows Donald Trump making statements regarding combat operations on Iran on Feb. 28, 2026, in Palm Beach, Florida. (US President Trump Via Truth Social/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Fueling Trump’s decline appears to be the surge in gas prices.

The average price of gasoline in the U.S. topped $4 per gallon on Tuesday, according to national averages from AAA and GasBuddy, for the first time in four years.

Advertisement

FOX BUSINESS: GAS PRICES TOP $4 PER GALLON

The military attacks by the U.S. and Israel have resulted in the deaths of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other top officials, and the decimation of the country’s military.

In response, Iran has targeted energy facilities with missile and drone attacks in a number of Persian Gulf nations. It has also made the Strait of Hormuz nearly impassable to commercial shipping, bringing roughly 20% of the world’s oil supply to a halt and sending global fuel prices sharply higher.

Advertisement
Rising gas prices at the pumps

A gas station displays a sign for $3.999 for regular gasoline, in Cleveland, Monday, March 30, 2026.  (Sue Ogrocki/AP Photo)

That has only exacerbated Trump’s polling woes when it comes to his performance on the economy, amid public dissatisfaction with high prices and the cost of living.

A spotlight on inflation helped fuel sweeping victories by Trump and Republicans in the 2024 elections, when they won back the White House and Senate and successfully defended their slim House majority.

DEMOCRATS TARGET TRUMP, GOP, OVER SURING GAS PRICES 

Advertisement

But a laser focus on affordability by Democrats, amid persistent inflation, has fueled a slew of victories and overperformances in 2025’s off-year elections and in special elections in the more than 14 months since Trump returned to the White House.

According to the Fox News poll, 80% of respondents said they were concerned about gas prices, and 86% concerned about inflation and high prices. And the CNN survey spotlighted that the president’s approval rating for handling the economy sank to 31%, Trump’s lowest level ever in their polling.

The White House says the surge in prices is temporary.

Advertisement

«When Operation Epic Fury is complete, gas prices will plummet back to the multiyear lows American drivers enjoyed before these short-term disruptions,» White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement on Tuesday.

Leavitt emphasized that «President Trump remains committed to fully unleashing American energy dominance, lowering costs, and putting more money back in the pockets of hardworking American families.»

OIL HAS SURGED SINCE THE IRAN CONFLICT BEGAN, BUT GAS PRICES MAY NOT BE DONE RISING

Advertisement

The gas price surge is giving Democrats more political ammunition to target the GOP.

«BREAKING: National Gas Prices Skyrocket to $4 Per Gallon,» read the headline from an email Tuesday morning from the Democratic National Committee.

The House Democrats’ campaign committee last week launched digital ads showing prices at the pump rising and an image saying «D.C. Republicans Did That!» Sources say to expect another round of ads on gas prices in the coming weeks.

Advertisement

But Democrats have their own polling problems, as the party’s brand image has cratered to historic lows in a slew of polls over the past year.

Shaw, pointing to the so-called double-haters, voters who disapprove of both Trump and the Democrats, said that group hasn’t «really swung dramatically to the Democrats» as the midterms approach.

Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas emphasized in a recent Fox News Digital interview that, in his opinion, Trump’s «decision to launch this military action is the most consequential decision» of his presidency.

Advertisement

Such perceptions only increase what’s at stake when Trump addresses the nation in prime time.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«The American people want to hear what the off-ramp for the war is and when it will end,» Dan Eberhart, an oil drilling chief executive officer and prominent Republican donor told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

Eberhart, who is supportive of the president, said: «Trump’s base is with him, but many ordinary Americans feel the war is unnecessary. Tonight is Trump’s opportunity to explain why this war matters to everyday Americans.»

donald trump, war with iran, iran, polls, midterm elections, inflation, politics

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Ciudadanía por nacimiento: Trump asiste a la Corte para defender su decreto, pero se encuentra con un tribunal en duda

Published

on


La Corte Suprema puso en duda este miércoles las restricciones del presidente Donald Trump a la ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento en un caso trascendental que cobró mayor relevancia por la presencia sin precedentes de Trump en la sala.

Trump llegó este miércoles, en un hecho inédito, a la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, donde asistió a la audiencia sobre la ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento (que él prohibió con un decreto) convirtiéndose así en el primer presidente en ejercicio en presenciar los argumentos orales ante el máximo tribunal del país.

Advertisement

Los magistrados, tanto conservadores como liberales, cuestionaron si el decreto de Trump, que declara que los hijos nacidos de padres que se encuentran en Estados Unidos de forma ilegal o temporal no son ciudadanos estadounidenses, se ajusta a la Constitución o a la ley federal.

Trump permaneció poco más de una hora en la sala para escuchar los argumentos del principal abogado de la administración republicana ante la Corte Suprema, el procurador general D. John Sauer. El presidente se retiró poco después de que la abogada Cecillia Wang comenzara su presentación en defensa de la ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento en su totalidad.

La agenda oficial del presidente republicano, publicada por la Casa Blanca, incluía desde temprano la visita a la Corte Suprema, donde los magistrados escucharán la apelación de Trump contra el fallo de un tribunal inferior que anuló su orden ejecutiva que limitaba la ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento.

Advertisement

La orden, firmada por Trump el primer día de su segundo mandato, declaraba que los hijos nacidos de padres que se encuentran en Estados Unidos de forma ilegal o temporal no son ciudadanos estadounidenses.

Esto representa un giro radical respecto a la postura tradicional de que la Decimocuarta Enmienda de la Constitución y la legislación federal desde 1940 otorgan la ciudadanía a toda persona nacida en territorio estadounidense, con contadas excepciones.

La orden de ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento, firmada por Trump el 20 de enero de 2025, forma parte de la amplia campaña de represión migratoria de su administración republicana.

Advertisement

Todos los tribunales inferiores que han examinado el asunto han declarado ilegal la orden y han impedido su entrada en vigor. Se espera un fallo definitivo del Tribunal Supremo a principios del verano (boreal).

En un posteo en redes sociales Trump protestó: «La ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento tiene que ver con los hijos de esclavos, no con multimillonarios chinos que tienen 56 hijos, todos los cuales se convierten en ciudadanos estadounidenses. ¡Una de las muchas grandes estafas de nuestro tiempo!».

Trump opina sobre la ciudadanía por nacimiento. Foto: @realDonaldTrump

«Voy a ir»

No es la primera vez que Trump considera asistir a una audiencia ante la Corte Suprema. El año pasado, Trump expresó su gran interés en asistir a una audiencia sobre si había excedido la ley federal con sus aranceles generalizados, pero finalmente desistió, argumentando que habría sido una distracción.

Advertisement
Un manifestante protesta frente a la Corte este miércoles. Foto: Reuters

“Voy a ir”, dijo Trump cuando se mencionaron los próximos argumentos en el caso de la ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento. Ante una pregunta posterior para aclarar si planeaba asistir en persona, Trump respondió: “Creo que sí, lo creo”.

Trump acudió a la Corte Suprema durante su primer mandato para la ceremonia de juramento del primer juez que nombró, Neil Gorsuch. Otros dos jueces que nombró —Brett Kavanaugh y Amy Coney Barrett— también forman parte de la Corte.

Otros presidentes han tratado directamente con la Corte, pero no parecen haberlo hecho durante su mandato. Richard Nixon argumentó un caso entre su vicepresidencia y su presidencia, y William Howard Taft fue presidente de la Corte Suprema tras su presidencia.

Claves: ¿Qué está en juego?

Advertisement

El caso: la primera frase de la 14.ª Enmienda, la Cláusula de Ciudadanía, otorga la ciudadanía a “todas las personas nacidas o naturalizadas en los Estados Unidos y sujetas a su jurisdicción”, lo que, según la interpretación tradicional, incluye a los hijos de madres que se encuentran ilegalmente en el país. El caso gira en torno al significado de la última frase sobre la jurisdicción.

Manifestantes a favor y en contra del decreto de Trump. Foto: AP

El argumento: la postura de Trump, respaldada por algunos juristas conservadores, es que las personas que se encuentran ilegalmente o temporalmente en el país no están “sujetas a la jurisdicción” de los Estados Unidos y, por lo tanto, sus hijos nacidos en EE.UU. no tienen derecho a la ciudadanía.

Las implicaciones: más de 250 000 bebés nacidos cada año en EE.UU. se verían afectados por la orden ejecutiva. Esto concuerda con otras políticas antiinmigratorias de la administración Trump: el aumento de las deportaciones, la drástica reducción del número de refugiados admitidos en EE.UU. y la suspensión del asilo en la frontera.

Las restricciones al derecho de nacimiento también se aplicarían a las personas que se encuentran legalmente en EE.UU., incluidos estudiantes y solicitantes de residencia permanente.

Advertisement

Un poco de historia: el caso de Wong Kim Ark

La decisión de la Coarte era un desafío a toda la jurisprudencia en vigor desde finales del siglo XIX, cuando un hombre llamado Wong Kim Ark, nacido en San Francisco en 1873, hijo de padres que habían llegado a Estados Unidos procedentes de China, quiso volver al país tras un viaje a la tierra de sus padres, en 1895.

Su entrada fue denegada por la policía fronteriza en virtud de un Ley de Exclusión China, para frenar la inmigración de ese país.

Advertisement
Un manifestante a favor de la 14° Enmienda de la Constitución. Foto: Reuters

Wong Kim Ark apeló a la 14ª enmienda de la Constitución estadounidense.

La Corte Suprema le dio la razón y recordó que esa enmienda, aprobada tras la traumática Guerra Civil de 1861-65, sirvió para confirmar que los millones de esclavos de origen africano liberados, así como sus descendientes, tenían derecho a la ciudadanía.

Durante más de un siglo, Estados Unidos ha aplicado esta regla de manera amplia, a todos los nacidos en su suelo o en territorios bajo su jurisdicción.

Pero el flujo constante de inmigrantes indocumentados en las últimas décadas ha llevado a algunos juristas conservadores a exigir una revisión de ese derecho.

Advertisement

Los hijos de diplomáticos por ejemplo no tienen derecho automático a la ciudadanía estadounidense, ni tampoco los miembros de tribus nativas soberanas.

Con información de Associated Press y AFP

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias