Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Trump buries Biden foreign policy in first 100 days

Published

on


One hundred days into his new administration, President Donald Trump has reset negotiations with allies and foes across the globe, and experts say one is certain: it is all transactional. 

Gone are the days when the U.S. could be drawn to throw its force around the world solely in the name of defending or spreading democracy. Global leaders are learning to speak a new language with U.S. leadership, one that is less about ideology and more about how their interests benefit U.S. interests. 

Advertisement

«There is a lot more transactional engagement rather than I think we’re ideological-based, policy decisions that were sort of the hallmark of the Biden administration,» said Gregg Roman, executive director of the Middle East Forum. 

Here is a round-up of how Trump has changed U.S. foreign policy since taking office: 

FOX NEWS POLL: THE FIRST 100 DAYS OF PRESIDENT TRUMP’S SECOND TERM

Advertisement

Iran’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei, left, and President Donald Trump are working on a nuclear deal. (West Asia News Agency, Reuters | SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

Negotiating a deal to avert a nuclear Iran 

Former President Joe Biden toyed with reviving a nuclear deal with Iran and criticized Trump’s decision to pull the U.S. out of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, but his administration made little progress toward serious negotiations. 

Trump has now expressed interest in a new nuclear deal. He told Israel the U.S. would not come to their aid in attacking Iran until diplomatic negotiations played out. 

Advertisement

As Trump’s team met with Iranian counterparts in Oman this weekend for a second round of nuclear talks, he issued another threat: if negotiations whither away, the U.S. would not be dragged by Israel into war with Iran but will be «leading the pack.» 

Taking Yemen’s Houthis head-on

An offensive campaign against Yemen’s Houthi terrorists launched six weeks ago has struck more than 800 targets and cost nearly $1 billion – a sharp departure from the tit-for-tat retaliatory strikes seen under the Biden administration, when Houthis attacked U.S. naval ships and Western commercial vessels.

«Biden pursued a policy of retaliatory strikes: If you hit us, we’ll hit you,» said Roman. «What Trump is trying to do is what I call a salting the earth strategy. If you dare challenge American military supremacy or the ability for us to conduct free trade to the bottom of or through the Gulf of Aden, Gulf of Yemen, Red Sea, Suez … We will attempt to end your ability to wage war on the United States in its interests.»

Advertisement

US STRIKES KILL HUNDREDS OF HOUTHI FIGHTERS, HIT OVER 800 RED SEA TARGETS: CENTRAL COMMAND

Houthi fighters are pictured next to U.S. President Donald Trump.

President Donald Trump is taking a different approach when dealing with Houthi fighters. (AP Images/Getty Images)

From funding Ukraine ‘as long as it takes’ to demanding a negotiated settlement 

While Biden had promised the U.S. would stand by Ukraine «as long as it takes» in the war against Russia, Trump expressed a desire to see the war come to an end, promising that he could end the war on «day one» of his presidency.

One hundred days in, the war is not over. Negotiations are ongoing, and Trump has jumped between sounding off in frustration with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin. 

Advertisement

As Putin continues to strike even civilian regions of Ukraine, Trump questioned on Saturday whether the Russian leader truly wants peace or is «tapping me along.» 

He again questioned whether he would need to slap «secondary sanctions» on nations that do business with Russia to starve its war coffers. 

On Monday, Russia offered a three-day ceasefire from May 8-10, but the White House was not satisfied. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump wants a «permanent ceasefire.» 

Advertisement

Trump met face-to-face with Zelenskyy in Rome on Saturday, the first time since their infamous Oval Office spat in February, after slamming Zelenskyy’s latest rejection of his peace proposal, one that would have formally ceded Crimea to the Russians.

President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zlenksyy

President Donald Trump, left, met face-to-face with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for the first time since their Oval Office spat in February over the weekend. (Vatican and Ukraine Ambassador to Holy See)

Strategic takeover: New pushes for Greenland, Panama

The Monroe Doctrine is back, analysts say, and Trump wants both Greenland and the Panama Canal under U.S. control.

The proposals drew shock across the world, but at least in Panama, Trump’s bold words prompted a proposal to offer the U.S. «first and free» passage for its warships, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said earlier this month. It also spurred the proposed sale of two ports of entry from Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison to U.S.-based BlackRock, though that deal has been delayed by Chinese regulatory and political scrutiny. 

Advertisement

Efforts to attain Greenland have proved less successful. Tough talk against Denmark and its ownership of Greenland has ratcheted up tensions with the NATO ally and Greenland’s leadership has expressed little interest in becoming a part of the U.S. 

However, Trump has called out the threat of Russia and China’s increasing arctic military capabilities – the shortest range for a missile to travel from Russia to the U.S. would be over the icy island’s territory. Trump is also interested in the rare earth mining potential of the massive swath of land. 

: An aerial view shows cargo vessels docked at Balboa Port, operated by Panama Ports Company, at the Panama Canal, in Panama City, Panama, February 1, 2025

President Donald Trump wants the U.S. to control the Panama Canal. (REUTERS/Enea Lebrun/File Photo)

Allies step up for their own defense 

Trump’s threats to pull out of the NATO alliance – or refuse to come to the defense of allies that do not contribute enough military spending – has left nations across the world planning for the contingency that they may have to defend themselves without U.S. aid. 

Advertisement

The European Union announced a plan for its nations to spend $840 billion to «re-arm Europe» after Trump halted all aid to Ukraine in March. 

Countries like Spain, Belgium and Sweden have all announced plans this year to increase defense spending to meet NATO’s 2% target, while eastern European states near Russia’s border, including Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Poland, have announced plans to increase defense spending to around 5%. 

Punishing China for unfair trade practices

Concern over China’s hegemonic ambitions bridges the partisan divide, but the Biden White House never considered such drastic measures as 145% tariffs. 

Advertisement

Trump has said the goal of the tariffs is to both bring back US manufacturing after decades of offshore production and punish China for intellectual property theft, a massive trade imbalance, and fentanyl flowing from China to the U.S. A free trade push in the early 2000s had wrongly assumed liberal trade policies would bring democratic values and free markets into Chinese borders, his supporters argue. 

Trump has insisted that President Xi Jinping wants to cut a deal to lower the soaring tariffs, even as China has rejected the prospect of talks. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

It is unclear what sort of realistic concessions the U.S. could get out of a deal, perhaps promises to buy more American-made agricultural products, fuel or other specialty goods. 

For now, steep tariffs remain, and China is choking off U.S. supply of critical minerals, which could spell deep trouble for everyday electronics, electric vehicles and defense equipment.

Donald Trump,White House,Foreign Policy,Middle East,Russia,Ukraine,China,Greenland

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Irán afirma que cerró el estratégico estrecho de Ormuz, en un paso audaz que incendia aún más la región

Published

on


En medio de la creciente tensión por los ataques estadounidenses, el régimen de Teherán habría cerrado el paso en el crucial estrecho de Ormuz, un punto de importancia estratégica mundial que separa las costas de Irán y Omán, se encuentra entre el Golfo Pérsico y el Golfo de Omán y por sus aguas se transporta alrededor del 20 por ciento de la producción mundial de petróleo y también de gas.

Irán dice que el estrecho de Ormuz es «inseguro» y está «de facto cerrado», según informaron diferentes medios locales. Pero el Organismo Británico de Comercio Marítimo (UKMTO) negó la información.

Advertisement

«Los Guardianes de la Revolución advirtieron a varios barcos de la inseguridad en torno al estrecho debido a la agresión militar de Estados Unidos e Israel y a la respuesta de Irán, y que no es seguro pasar por el estrecho en este momento», indicó la agencia de prensa Tasnim. «Con el cese del paso de los barcos y petroleros por el estrecho de Ormuz, el estrecho quedó de facto cerrado», agregó.

La misión naval de la Unión Europea en el mar Rojo, Aspides, confirmó a la AFP esta información. Según el teniente coronel Sócrates Ravanos, los buques recibieron mensajes de radio de alta frecuencia en los que el ejército ideológico de Irán afirma que «ningún barco tiene permitido pasar por el estrecho de Ormuz».

El Organismo Británico de Comercio Marítimo, reconoció que ha habido numerosos barcos que transitan por el Golfo Pérsico y que este sábado han enviado señales de radiofrecuencia VHF asegurando que ese estrecho (que separa Irán por el norte y Emiratos Árabes Unidos por el sur ) estaba cerrado. Pero aclaró que esa información no estaba confirmada.

Advertisement

«Esos informes no han podido ser confirmados independientemente», dijo el UKMTO, que añadió que los mensajes que se envían por canales VHF «no son legalmente vinculantes y no constituyen ninguna restricción de navegación según la ley internacional».

El gobierno estadounidense instó el sábado a los barcos comerciales a evitar la región de Oriente Medio tras los ataques aéreos de Estados Unidos e Israel contra Irán, y las represalias de Teherán en distintos puntos de la región.

El estrecho de Ormuz, el golfo Pérsico, el golfo de Omán y el mar Arábigo están sujetos a «actividad militar significativa» y «se recomienda que los buques se mantengan alejados de esta zona», afirmó la Administración Marítima del Departamento de Transporte de Estados Unidos en un comunicado.

Advertisement

Los buques con bandera estadounidense, de propiedad estadounidense o tripulados por estadounidenses también deben mantenerse a 30 millas náuticas de cualquier buque militar de su país para evitar ser confundidos con una amenaza, añadió.

Golpe al mercado petrolero

Advertisement

El ataque de Israel y EE. UU. contra Irán puede impactar en el mercado petrolero ante una posible caída de suministros desde un país que tiene una producción importante y que además podría cerrar al tráfico marítimo el estrecho de Ormuz.

Por este estrecho, que en su punto más angosto mide 54 kilómetros, transitan cada día un promedio de 144 buques, de los que un 37 % son petroleros; 17% buques portacontenedores y 13% graneleros, según datos del informe Revisión del Transporte Marítimo 2025, de ONU Comercio y Desarrollo (UNCTAD).

La Administración de Información Energética de Estados Unidos (EIA) apunta a que en 2024 y el primer trimestre de 2025, esta vía canalizó una parte significativa del comercio marítimo total de petróleo.

Advertisement


La EIA también indica que alrededor de un 20 por ciento del comercio mundial de gas natural licuado fluye por allí, principalmente desde Catar y Emiratos Árabes Unidos hacia mercados de Asia.


Durante años, las autoridades persas ha amenazado en varias ocasiones, tanto a Israel como a Estados Unidos, con bloquear el tránsito marítimo, sobre todo a este último, en respuesta a las sanciones impuestas por Washington por su programa nuclear.


En el escenario de crisis prebélica con Estados Unidos, en febrero de 2026 Irán informó del cierre puntual de ciertas áreas de la zona por la celebración de las maniobras navales Control Inteligente del estrecho de Ormuz.

Advertisement


Con anterioridad, el 21 de junio de 2025 el Parlamento iraní aprobó su cierre después de que la nueva administración estadounidense de Donald Trump ordenara el bombardeó de Irán en el marco del conflicto entre Israel y el país persa.


Por su enclave geográfico, el Golfo Pérsico ha sido escenario de numerosos incidentes en los últimos años, incluidos ataques y confiscaciones de petroleros y cargueros, en medio las tensiones entre Irán y Estados Unidos por las sanciones impuestas por este último a la venta de petróleo iraní.


Un ejemplo fue cuando, en 2018, EE.UU decidió retirarse del acuerdo nuclear firmado entre Irán y las potencias en 2015 al considerar que Teherán mintió sobre su programa atómico al seguir enriqueciendo uranio por encima de los límites permitidos.

Advertisement


En abril de 2019, la situación se agravó después de que EE.UU endureciera las sanciones a la exportación de petróleo por parte de Irán y, como consecuencia, las autoridades iraníes amenazaron con bloquear el estrecho.


En 2021, y debido a que en los últimos años la zona fue escenario de ataques a petroleros, Irán inauguró una estratégica terminal de exportación de petróleo en el mar de Omán, lo que evitó, por primera vez a los cargueros tener que cruzar el estrecho de Ormuz.


El crudo llegaría a la instalación, situada en la ciudad costera de Jask, en la provincia sureña de Hormozgan, a través de un oleoducto que tiene su origen en el campo petrolífero de Goreh, en la región de Bushehr.

Advertisement


Este megaproyecto contó con una tubería que se extiende por 1.000 kilómetros y tiene una capacidad de transferencia de 300.000 barriles de petróleo por día de Goreh a Jask en esta primera fase y, en el futuro, podría alcanzar el millón.

A lo largo de los años, continuaron las tensiones como en abril de 2024, tras el ataque contra el consulado iraní en Damasco en el que murieron siete guardias revolucionarios, y del que Teherán acusó a Tel Aviv y que estuvo a punto de provocar el cierre de este estrecho.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Omar, Squad lash out at Trump in response to Iran strike: ‘Illegal regime change war’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Democratic Reps. Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, both progressive «Squad» members, lashed out at President Donald Trump on Saturday in response to his decision to strike Iran. 

Advertisement

«Trump has launched an illegal regime change war,» Omar posted on X. «As someone who has survived the horrors of war, I know military strikes will not make us safer; they will inflame tensions and push the region further into chaos.»

Omar, who fled Somalia as a refugee as a young child, added, «When we abandon diplomacy, we choose destruction.»

Tlaib reacted on social media to a clip of Trump acknowledging that there may be American casualties in this attack. 

Advertisement

Rep. Ilhan Omar, with Rep. Rashida Tlaib at her side, speaks at a press conference. (Renee Jones Schneider/Star Tribune via Getty Images)

«He doesn’t care about our loved ones in the military,» Tlaib posted on X in a message that was reposted by Omar. «He doesn’t care about the fact that Americans don’t want this war.»

«He doesn’t care about the Iranian people. He is corrupted. Don’t fall for the lies.»

Advertisement

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York also slammed President Donald Trump for abandoning diplomacy in favor of launching an attack against Iran, predicting the outcome will be «catastrophic.»

«The American people are once again dragged into a war they did not want by a president who does not care about the long-term consequences of his actions. This war is unlawful. It is unnecessary. And it will be catastrophic,» Ocasio-Cortez said.

«Just this week, Iran and the United States were negotiating key measures that could have staved off war. The President walked away from these discussions and chose war instead. President Trump flippantly acknowledged the possibility of American casualties, stating ‘that often happens in war,’» she continued. «Mr. President: this was not an inevitability. This is a deliberate choice of aggression when diplomacy and security were within reach. Stop lying to the American people.

Advertisement

Democratic Rep. Greg Casar, another progressive House member associated with the informal «Squad» group, called Trump’s actions an «illegal war» in a post on X.

«Yet again, an American president is sending other people’s kids to risk their lives in a senseless regime change war,» Casar said. 

The U.S. and Israel launched the joint attack just after 9 a.m. local time in what the Pentagon has dubbed «Operation Epic Fury.»

Advertisement

IF KHAMENEI FALLS, WHO TAKES IRAN? STRIKES WILL EXPOSE POWER VACUUM — AND THE IRGC’S GRIP

In video remarks posted to Truth Social, Trump addressed the Iranian people directly and told them to «seize control of [their] destiny.»

«The hour of your freedom is at hand. Stay sheltered. Don’t leave your home. It’s very dangerous outside. Bombs will be dropping everywhere. When we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take,» Trump said. «This will be, probably, your only chance for generations. For many years, you have asked for America’s help, but you never got it. No President was willing to do what I am willing to do tonight. Now you have a President who is giving you what you want.»

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

AOC during a news conference

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

While Trump focused some of his message on empowering the people of Iran, he stated that the intent of the operation is to «defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime,» which he described as «vicious» and «very hard, terrible people.»

Trump also said that while there may be American casualties as a result, the mission is «noble» as it is aimed at stopping a «wicked, radical dictatorship» from threatening American national security interests and destabilizing the Middle East.

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Michael Sinkewicz and Alex Nitzberg contributed to this report

Related Article

Fetterman praises Operation Epic Fury: Trump is 'willing to do what's right'

politics,iran,ilhan omar,rashida tlaib

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Gulf states condemn Iranian retaliatory strikes on their territories following US-Israeli operation

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Arab nations are sounding off against Iran after the regime launched strikes against U.S. interests in neighboring countries in the region in retaliation for U.S.-Israeli joint strikes against Iran’s leaders.

Advertisement

The Iranian response targeted all U.S. bases in the Gulf, except for U.S. bases in Oman, Fox News’ Jennifer Griffin reported, since the Omani foreign minister had tried to mediate the nuclear talks in Geneva, even flying to Washington, D.C., to meet Vice President JD Vance at the White House on Friday to try to avert what is quickly turning into a regional war.

Griffin reported that approximately 40 missiles had landed in Israel. Meanwhile, the U.S. military in Iraq intercepted at least one missile targeting U.S. facilities. Additionally, Iran appeared to hit the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet, but no casualties were reported.

Iran also launched missiles at Saudi Arabia and Jordan, where the U.S. has squadrons of advanced fighter jets, Griffin reported.

Advertisement

This map shows the targets of Iran’s retaliatory strikes. (Fox News)

Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates were among the Gulf states that condemned the Iranian strikes, with many saying they reserve the right to defend themselves and respond accordingly to attacks on their sovereign territories.

Qatar’s Foreign Ministry said it reserves its «full right» to defend itself after what it described as Iranian aggression targeting Qatari territory. Its Defense Ministry said it «successfully thwarted a number of attacks targeting the country’s territory» after multiple rounds of alerts sounded. Authorities reported no immediate injuries or damage in residential areas.

Advertisement
map showing locations of US bases in Middle East in relation to Iran

The locations of U.S. military bases throughout the Gulf are seen in relation to Iran. (Fox News)

Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Ministry said it affirmed «its full solidarity with and unwavering support for the brotherly countries» and warned of «grave consequences resulting from the continued violation of states’ sovereignty and the principles of international law.»

TRUMP ENVOY WITKOFF AND JARED KUSHNER IN GENEVA FOR CLOSELY WATCHED IRAN NEGOTIATIONS

The United Arab Emirates’ Ministry of Defense said the country «was subjected to a blatant attack involving Iranian ballistic missiles,» adding that air defense systems «successfully intercepted a number of missiles.» Authorities said falling debris in a residential area caused «one civilian death of an Asian nationality» and material damage.

Advertisement
map showing Bahrain's location

Fox News’ Jennifer Griffin reported that Iran appeared to hit the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet, but no casualties were reported. (Fox News)

The ministry called the attack «a dangerous escalation and a cowardly act that threatens the safety of civilians and undermines stability,» and stated the UAE «reserves its full right to respond.»

Jordan’s foreign minister wrote a series of posts on X, saying that King Abdullah II «condemns the attack on the territories of Jordan, and any attacks on Arab countries,» expressing Jordan’s «solidarity with the brotherly Arab countries in confronting any aggressions that affect their sovereignty, security, and stability.»

Lebanon’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it also «strongly condemns the Iranian attacks,» adding that it «affirms its full solidarity with these fellow Arab States and firmly rejects any violation of their sovereignty, any threat to their security, or any action undermining their stability.»

Advertisement
Iran Strikes inside Bahrain

Smoke rises in the sky after blasts were heard in Manama, Bahrain, Feb. 28, 2026.  (REUTERS/Stringer)

Meanwhile, the Omani Foreign Ministry condemned the U.S.-Israeli operation against Iran.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«The Ministry of Foreign Affairs expresses the Sultanate of Oman’s profound regret over the military operations launched by Israel and the United States of America against the Islamic Republic of Iran, warning of the danger of the conflict expanding into consequences that cannot be rectified in the region,» the Omani Foreign Ministry said in a statement, according to X’s translation.

Advertisement

«The Sultanate of Oman considers this action to be in contravention of the rules of international law and the principle of resolving issues through peaceful means rather than hostile means, the shedding of blood, and calls on all parties to immediately suspend military operations, while urging the United Nations Security Council to convene an urgent meeting to impose a ceasefire and for the international community to take a clear stance in support of international law,» it added.

Fox News Digital’s Efrat Lachter contributed to this report.



iran,middle east,saudi arabia,lebanon,middle east foreign policy,world

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias