Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Trump nominees pile up as GOP weighs rule shift once floated by Democrats

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Senate Republicans are getting closer to changing the upper chamber’s rules to allow for a slew of President Donald Trump’s lower-level nominees to be confirmed, and they’re closing in on a revived proposal from Democrats to do it.

Advertisement

The hope among Republicans is that using a tool that Senate Democrats once considered would allow them to avoid turning to the «nuclear option,» meaning a rule change with a simple majority vote.

«The Democrats should support it, because it was their original proposal that we’re continuing on,» Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., told Fox News Digital. «And I wouldn’t be surprised if they won’t. This historic obstruction by the Democrats is all playing to their far-left liberal base, who hate President Trump.»

REPUBLICAN DOCTORS CLASH WITH RFK JR OVER VACCINES IN TENSE SENATE SHOWDOWN

Advertisement

Senate Republicans are eyeing a Democratic proposal from years ago to change the Senate’s rules to ram President Donald Trump’s nominees through Senate Democrats’ blockade.  (Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Republicans met throughout the week behind closed doors to discuss their options and have begun to coalesce around a proposal that would allow them to take one vote to confirm a group of nominees, also known as «en bloc,» for sub-Cabinet level positions.

So far, the only nominee to make it through the Senate with ease was Secretary of State Marco Rubio in January. Since then, various positions throughout the bureaucracy have stacked up and have not received a voice vote or gone through unanimous consent — two commonly-used fast-track procedures for lower-level positions in the administration.

Advertisement

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said that before Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., was in charge of the Democrats, «this was always done in a way where, if you had some of the lower-level nominees in the administration, those were all voted en bloc, they were packaged, they were grouped, they were stacked.»

«This is the first president in history who, at this point in his presidency, hasn’t had at least one nominee clear by unanimous consent or voice vote,» he said. «It is unprecedented what they’re doing. It’s got to be stopped.»

TOP SENATE REPUBLICAN READY TO GO NUCLEAR, ‘ROLL OVER’ DEMOCRATS WITH RULE CHANGE TO CONFIRM TRUMP NOMINEES

Advertisement
senate majority leader john thune walks to a vote in Washington, D.C.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., heads to the Senate chamber on Jan. 22, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)

And the number of nominees on the Senate’s calendar continues to grow, reaching 149 picks awaiting confirmation this week. The goal would be to make that rule change before lawmakers leave town for a week starting Sept. 22.

The idea comes from legislation proposed in 2023 by Sens. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., Angus King, I-Maine, and former Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md. Republicans are eyeing their own spin on it, such as possibly not limiting the number of en bloc nominees in a group or excluding judicial nominees.

Republicans would prefer to avoid going nuclear — the last time the nuclear option was used was in 2019, when then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., lowered debate time on nominees to two hours — but they are willing to do so, given that Democrats haven’t budged on their blockade.

Advertisement

They may only be making a public display of resistance, however.

«Democrats privately support what Republicans are talking about,» a senior GOP aide familiar with negotiations told Fox News Digital. «They’re just too afraid to admit it.»

Sen. James Lankford, who worked with Thune and Barrasso over the recess to build a consensus on a rule change proposal, told Fox News Digital that his Democratic colleagues acknowledged that they’ve «created a precedent that is not sustainable.»

Advertisement

TRUMP THREATENS LAWSUIT OVER ‘BLUE SLIPS’ AS TOP GOP SENATOR BUCKS DEMAND TO BEND SENATE RULES FOR NOMINEES

Klobuchar called the Minnesota Catholic school shooter a "he."

The idea comes from legislation proposed in 2023 by Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., among others. (Bloomberg/Getty)

«But then they’ll say, ‘but my progressive base is screaming at me to fight however I want to. I know I’m damaging the Senate, but I got to show that I’m fighting,’» the Oklahoma Republican said.

«We feel stuck, I mean, literally,» Lankford continued. «Some of my colleagues have said, ‘We’re not the ones going nuclear. They’re the ones that are going nuclear.’»

Advertisement

Klobuchar told Fox News Digital that she appreciated the prior work she’s done with Lankford on «ways to make the Senate better» but wasn’t ready to get behind the GOP’s version of her legislation.

«When I proposed that, it was meant to pass as legislation, which means you would have needed bipartisan votes, and the reason that’s not happening right now is because the president keeps flaunting the law,» she said.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Not every Senate Democrat is on board with the wholesale blockade, however.

Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., told Fox News Digital that lawmakers should all behave in a way in which administrations, either Republican or Democratic, get «those basic kinds of considerations» for nominees.

«That’s not the resistance,» he said. «I just think that’s kind of unhelpful to just move forward. I mean, you can oppose people like the big ones, whether it’s [Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F.] Kennedy or others.»

Advertisement

Fox News Digital reached out to Schumer’s office for comment but did not immediately hear back. 

senate,donald trump,chuck schumer,politics

INTERNACIONAL

Shapiro fires back at DHS, says truck driver accused in deadly crash had legal status in database

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro’s team is disputing the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) assertions about the immigration status of a semi-truck driver involved in a crash that left four dead in Indiana. The driver was taken into U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody after a detainer was placed on him.

Advertisement

DHS said the driver, Bekzhan Beishekeev, a 30-year-old national of Kyrgyzstan, came into the U.S. «illegally» using the controversial CBP One app and was later issued a commercial driver’s license (CDL) in Pennsylvania. The department confirmed to Fox News that Beishekeev entered the country on Dec. 19, 2023, at the Nogales, Ariz., port of entry, using the CBP One app and was released into the U.S. via parole by the Biden administration.

«Not only was Bekzhan Beishekeev released into our country by the Biden administration using the CBP One app, but he was also given a commercial driver’s license by Governor Shapiro’s Pennsylvania. These decisions have had deadly consequences and led to the death of four innocent people in Indiana on Tuesday,» DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement.

McLaughlin then called on «sanctuary» governors to stop issuing CDLs to illegal immigrants «before another American gets killed.»

Advertisement

SEMI-TRUCK DRIVER HELD ON ICE DETAINER AFTER 4 KILLED IN HEAD-ON CRASH

Bekzhan Beishekeev, a 30-year-old national of Kyrgyzstan, was allegedly involved in a crash that left four dead. (Fox News/DHS)

Shapiro’s office argues that Beishekeev had legal status when he was issued the license in July 2025 and that he could still be eligible under a DHS database to receive one.

Advertisement

«Every person who applies for a non-domiciled commercial driver’s license issued by PennDOT must provide proof of identify and proof of their legal presence in the United States. That information is verified by the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database, administered by Kristi Noem and the United States Department of Homeland Security,» Shapiro spokesperson Alex Peterson said in a statement provided to Fox News.

«The individual in question had legal status in Kristi Noem’s database when the license was issued in July 2025 and still shows as eligible to receive a license as of today. Kristi Noem should focus on minding the shop in her own agency, as her incompetence and operational failures seem to be matching the scale of her moral failures as the Secretary of Homeland Security,» Peterson added.

Indiana State Police vehicle with lights on

The Indiana State Police is investigating the crash in Jay County. (Indiana State Police)

ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT ALLEGEDLY RAMS ICE VEHICLE, BITES AGENTS AFTER FAILED GUN PURCHASE IN PITTSBURGH

Advertisement

The deadly crash occurred on Feb. 3 at approximately 4:00 p.m. when Beishekeev was driving eastbound on Indiana’s State Route 67 and allegedly failed to break for a slowed semi-truck in front of him, according to DHS and Indiana State Police. Beishekeev then allegedly swerved into oncoming traffic and slammed into a van carrying 15 passengers. Four people were killed in the crash. DHS said the fatal incident is being investigated by the Indiana State Police, the Jay County Sheriff’s Department and the Jay County Coroner’s Office.

DHS and the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) have warned about the dangers of CDL issuing practices in several states following a series of fatal crashes allegedly involving illegal immigrants.

Split photo of Bekzhan Beishekeev and the damage to a vehicle after a crash

Bekzhan Beishekeev, left, has been taken into ICE custody following a fatal crash on Feb. 3, 2026, in Jay County, Ind., near the state’s border with Ohio. (Jay County Sheriff’s Department)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

In its statement on Beishekeev, DHS noted that ICE had previously arrested another illegal immigrant who was issued a CDL in Pennsylvania.

Akhror Bozorov, 31, is an Uzbek national who DHS said was wanted in his country of origin for belonging to a terrorist organization. Bozorov was arrested in Kansas on Nov. 9 while working as a commercial truck driver, using a CDL issued in Pennsylvania, according to DHS. Bozorov was allegedly granted work authorization in January 2024 under the Biden administration.

Fox News’ Alexis McAdams and Fox News Digital’s Gregary Norman-Diamond contributed to this report.

Advertisement

politics,us,illegal immigrants,pennsylvania

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Iran’s Khamenei stays away from talks as JD Vance says dynamic makes diplomacy ‘much more complicated’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

As indirect talks between the U.S. and Iran started on Friday in Oman, remarks from Vice President JD Vance earlier in the week questioning the absence of the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei from talks have raised a core dilemma for Washington — the person with ultimate authority in Tehran is not sitting at the negotiating table.

Advertisement

In the interview, Vance said, «It’s a very weird country to conduct diplomacy with, when you can’t even talk to the person who’s in charge of the country. That makes all of this much more complicated… It is bizarre that we can’t just talk to the actual leadership of the country. It really makes diplomacy very, very difficult,» he said on Megyn Kelly’s podcast.

IRANIAN SUPREME LEADER BLAMES TRUMP FOR INCREASINGLY INTENSE DEMONSTRATIONS

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei waves to the audience during a speech in Tehran, Iran, on Nov. 3, 2025. During his address marking the anniversary of the 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, known as the «National Day of Fight against Global Arrogance,» Khamenei stated that cooperation between Tehran and Washington is impossible as long as the U.S. continues to support Israel and maintain military bases in the region. ( Iranian Leader Press Office/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Advertisement

The Supreme Leader has no equals

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, 86, has served as Iran’s supreme leader since 1989 and remains the country’s highest political and religious authority, with ultimate control over military, security and strategic decisions. That concentration of power means any diplomatic outcome must ultimately pass through him.

Sina Azodi, the director of the Middle East Studies Program at George Washington University, told Fox News Digital that Khamenei’s authority stems from direct control over Iran’s core power centers. «He is very powerful because he is the commander in chief of the armed forces and appoints the heads of the IRGC, the Artesh (conventional military), the judiciary and other important institutions.»

Ali Khamenei

Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei makes first public appearance in weeks with fresh U.S. threats. (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader Credit/Associated Press)

Azodi added that protocol and hierarchy also explain Khamenei’s absence from negotiations. «Iranians are very adamant about diplomatic protocols — that since other countries don’t have the equivalent rank, he does not participate in any negotiations because his ‘equal’ rank does not exist,» Azodi said. «Even when foreign heads of state visit him, there is only the Iranian flag, and foreign flags are not allowed.»

Advertisement
Witkoff, Kushner in Oman for Iran talks

Omani Foreign Minister Sayyid Badr Hamad Al Busaidi, President Donald Trump’s Special Representative for the Middle East, Steve Witkoff and U.S. negotiator Jared Kushner meet ahead of the U.S.-Iran talks, in Muscat, the capital of Oman, on Feb. 6, 2026. (Oman Foreign Ministry/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Iranian sources familiar with internal discussions described Khamenei as operating from a legacy mindset at this stage of his life. «The supreme leader sees the confrontation with Washington as defining his historical role and believes Iran can retaliate against U.S. interests in the region. Khamenei is not focused on personal risk and views strategic confrontation as part of preserving his legacy,» a Middle Eastern source speaking on the condition of anonymity told Fox News Digital.

Behnam Ben Taleblu, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Fox News Digital that Khamenei remains the decisive figure in Iran’s system even as the regime faces pressure at home and abroad.

«He wields great influence in Iran but also exercises the greatest veto in Iran’s political hierarchy»

Advertisement

«He wields great influence in Iran but also exercises the greatest veto in Iran’s political hierarchy,» Ben Taleblu said.

He added, «The Iranian strategy… is to raise the cost of war in the thinking of the adversary,» he said, describing a system that signals willingness to talk while simultaneously preparing for confrontation.

He warned that «regimes that are afraid and lethal and weak can still be dangerous,» and said Tehran may believe threatening U.S. assets could deter a broader war even if such escalation risks triggering a stronger American response.

Advertisement

TOP IRANIAN GENERAL THREATENS TO ‘CUT OFF’ TRUMP’S HAND OVER POTENTIAL MILITARY STRIKES

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

In this picture released by the official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei stands as army air force staff salute at the start of their meeting in Tehran, Iran, Friday, Feb. 8, 2019. Khamenei is defending «Death to America» chants that are standard fare at anti-U.S. rallies across Iran but says the chanting is aimed at America’s leaders and not its people. (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP)

«Very difficult to say what Khamenei’s mindset is, but I think that he, along with other senior officials, think that the current conflict is not an isolated phenomenon but rather the continuation of the June 2025 conflict and the recent protests, which he called ‘an American coup,’» Azodi told Fox News Digital.

«I think that he thinks that the U.S. is definitely after a regime change and that needs to be resisted at all costs,» he added.

Advertisement

Inside Iran, frustration with Khamenei has become increasingly visible, according to a journalist reporting from within the country.

TRUMP SAYS IRANIAN SUPREME LEADER KHAMENEI SHOULD BE ‘VERY WORRIED’ AMID TENSIONS

Burning cars line a street in Tehran as thick smoke rises during unrest.

Cars burn in a street during a protest over the collapse of the currency’s value in Tehran, Iran, Jan. 8, 2026. (Stringer/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS)

«What people want more than anything else is for Khamenei to die… I hear it every day, everywhere I go — why doesn’t he die?» the journalist told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

«He is perceived as God’s representative, while leaders of enemy states are viewed as representatives of Satan, which is why he never meets with them.»

«You just open the Twitter of Iranians… the tweet is, why don’t you die? And everybody knows who we are talking about. So a nation is waiting for him to die.»

The journalist said many Iranians no longer believe political reform is possible and instead see generational change as the only turning point.

Advertisement
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei image on the wall during a pro-Iran demonstration

Iranian worshipers hold up their hands as signs of unity with Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during an anti-Israeli rally to condemn Israel’s attacks on Iran, in downtown Tehran, Iran, on June 20, 2025. (Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

An Iranian journalist in exile, Mehdi Ghadimi, told Fox News Digital that, «The Islamic government considers itself obligated to enforce Islamic law across the entire world. They harbor hatred toward Iranians and Jews, whom they regard as enemies of Islam,» he explained, «In such a structure, the leader is seen as more than a political ruler; he is perceived as God’s representative, while leaders of enemy states are viewed as representatives of Satan, which is why he never meets with them. If dialogue or compromise were to take place, his sacred image would collapse in the eyes of his supporters.»

He continued, «For this reason, groups labeled as ‘moderate,’ ‘reformist’ or ‘pro-Western’ are created so that the West can negotiate with them,» Ghadimi added. «No one within the structure of the Islamic Republic thinks about anything other than defeating the Western world and establishing Islamic dominance globally. The diplomats presented to Western politicians as moderates are tasked with using diplomacy to buy time for Khamenei.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

The negotiations come amid heightened regional tensions, U.S. military deployments and unresolved disputes over Iran’s nuclear program and missile capabilities.

Regional analysts say that for the U.S., the central challenge remains unchanged. Diplomats can negotiate, but the final decision rests with one man — a leader shaped by decades of confrontation with the United States, focused on regime survival and determined to preserve his legacy even as Iran enters a new round of talks.

Advertisement



ali khamenei,iran,jd vance,foreign policy,donald trump,world protests

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Una mesita y alfajores con forma de corazón: intimidades de la firma del acuerdo comercial con EE.UU.

Published

on


El encuentro que habían estado esperando por más de un año estaba al fin por concretarse. Al edificio de la calle17, justo frente a la Casa Blanca, llegaron 9 funcionarios argentinos, sortearon los estrictos controles de seguridad e ingresaron a un salón VIP del primer piso donde los esperaban 10 estadounidenses. El escenario era austero, pero los detalles marcaban que era un día especial: unas cajitas de bombones con sello oficial de EE.UU. y, más allá, unos alfajores de maicena con forma de corazón, quizás anticipando el día de San Valentin, o como augurio de la alianza que estaba a punto de rubricarse.

Por esa Oficina del United States Trade Representative (USTR), presidida por Jamieson Greer, habían desfilado múltiples compatriotas porque las negociaciones comerciales habían comenzado hace más de un año con el ex canciller Gerardo Werthein y sufrieron un volantazo cuando en abril de 2025 el presidente Donald Trump decidió lanzar la bomba de los aranceles recíprocos a todo el mundo.

Advertisement

Entonces, “Argentina ganó tiempo”, dijo a Clarín una fuente que participó de las conversaciones. “Hay que retrotraerse a diciembre del 24, cuando ganó Trump”. Ahí el presidente Javier Milei dio la orden de firmar un acuerdo de libre comercio y Werthein había iniciado el camino. Pero a partir del “Día de la Liberación” el 2 de abril del año pasado, hubo un cambio de planes: había que negociar un acuerdo bilateral para intentar bajar el 10% de impuestos que Trump había agregado al país, más el 25 y hasta el 50% al acero y aluminio.

“Ya estábamos encaminados. Entonces, el primer país del mundo que Estados Unidos llama a sentarse es a la Argentina”. De hecho, Werthein fue a los despachos del USTR al día siguiente. Y comenzó lo que, después de meses y meses de trabajo técnico, el canciller Pablo Quirno firmó este jueves con Greer: el Acuerdo de Comercio e Inversión Recíproca con Estados Unidos.

En el salón VIP había una mesa grande donde se ubicaron todos los funcionarios y luego llegó Greer. El clima era festivo y ya estaba todo acordado así que solo faltaba la firma del documento, de tapas azules, que estaba en una pequeña mesita aparte, con las banderas de ambos países detrás. Quirno y Greer estamparon su rúbrica y luego de las fotos de rigor hubo regalos mutuos: el argentino entregó un libro con fotos gauchescas y el estadounidense una vasija de cerámica nativa.

Advertisement

“Esto es un testimonio de lo que es la relación de Argentina con Estados Unidos”, dijo Greer.

No hubo café, menos champagne, apenas agua. La delegación argentina, que incluía al jefe negociador Luis Krekcler, el embajador Alec Oxenford, el subsecretario de Mercados Agroalimentarios Agustín Tejada, el jefe de misión adjunto Juan Cortelletti y otros funcionarios, celebró sin demasiadas estridencias, pero todos respiraron aliviados por haber culminado el proceso. Otros funcionarios también habían estado involucrados como el secretario de Coordinación Productiva Pablo Lavigne y Alejandro Cacace, secretario de Desregulación.

El 13 de noviembre se había aprobado un acuerdo “marco” pero faltaban afilar los detalles, las cuestiones técnicas y legales pero el día al fin había llegado. “En estas cosas nunca te podés confiar hasta que terminaste”, señalaron desde la comitiva oficial.

Advertisement
La foto de Pablo Quirno tras firmar el acuerdo de comercio e inversiones.

“Esto sucede por la relación Argentina-Estados Unidos, por la relación Milei y Trump”, dijeron desde la delegación oficial, y creen que puede servir como ejemplo para otros países de la región. Así lo expresó Greer en un comunicado: “La creciente colaboración entre el presidente Trump y el presidente Milei sirve como modelo de cómo los países de América, desde Alaska hasta Tierra del Fuego, pueden avanzar en nuestras ambiciones compartidas y salvaguardar nuestra seguridad económica y nacional”.

Para el Gobierno, este documento, más la ayuda millonaria del Tesoro, más otros acuerdos como el de minerales críticos firmado el miércoles en Washington, significan una “autopista” donde las empresas estadounidenses se sienten cómodas para invertir.

El canciller Quirno mostró el principio y el final del acuerdo que firmó Argentina con Estados Unidos. Foto X

Entre varios puntos, el acuerdo de 37 páginas y anexos contempla la eliminación de los aranceles recíprocos para 1.675 productos argentinos en distintos sectores y señala que el gobierno estadounidense «concederá una ampliación sin precedentes a 100.000 toneladas para el acceso preferencial de la carne bovina a su mercado».

Las fuentes destacan el aumento de la cuota como un claro beneficio para Argentina. “Es muy importante porque es algo que también a ellos les cuesta”, porque es una medida que disgusta a los granjeros estadounidenses.

Por otro lado, los argentinos no consiguieron que el documento incluyera una rebaja de los aranceles al acero y al aluminio, un tema que será tratado más adelante y quizás se resuelva con la implantación de cuotas, como sucedió en el pasado. “Como están negociando al mismo tiempo con varios países, ellos dicen que si benefician a la Argentina, el resto también van a reclamar”, explica la fuente.

Advertisement
Milei avanza en una estrategia de acercamiento directo a Trump. Foto: Reuters

Desde una mirada más microscópica, Ignacio Albe, Director Asistente para Argentina en el Atlantic Council y experto en el comercio bilateral, señala que el acuerdo “puede entenderse más como una hoja de ruta en la integración entre los dos países que como un simple acuerdo comercial” y destaca el logro de la expansión de la cuota de importación de carne vacuna argentina.

Sin embargo, resalta además otros puntos que no son tan evidentes como “el compromiso argentino de eliminar trabas administrativas (como tasas estadísticas y otros procesos) y, lo más importante, reconocer las normas técnicas de EE.UU. (como las de la FDA). No solo significa que consumidores argentinos de esos bienes van a poder consumirlos a menor precio, sino que en términos más generales Argentina se integra cada vez más en la cadena de valor de EE.UU., permitiendo que un medicamento o una pieza de maquinaria llegue al mercado con la menor cantidad de fricciones posibles”.

Además, “Argentina, como importadora, es altamente complementaria con Estados Unidos (la canasta de importaciones argentina es muy similar a la canasta de exportación americana). Todo esto apunta a que la implementación de este acuerdo puede tener beneficios tangibles”.

El presidente Milei esperaba firmar personalmente el documento con Trump, pero el jefe de la Casa Blanca decidió bajar el tono por críticas internas que han surgido de productores agropecuarios y desde el Congreso. La rúbrica sucedió luego de que El Salvador y Guatemala firmaran sus respectivos pactos días atrás.

Advertisement

Quienes siguieron de cerca el proceso resaltan que, a diferencia de los acuerdos con esos países centroamericanos, el de Argentina no es solo un documento de comercio sino también de inversión. Estas iniciativas, resaltan, significa “una plataforma que hoy no tiene ningún país de Sudamérica, que es testimonio de la relación privilegiada generada entre los presidentes Milei y Trump”.

Continue Reading

Tendencias