INTERNACIONAL
Trump signs executive orders bolstering nuclear industry, domestic uranium mining
President Donald Trump signed several executive orders (EOs) on nuclear energy proliferation and an order removing political considerations from public-sector science, as conservatives claimed the latter was scandalized in its response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Trump also signed restoring «gold standard science» as the cornerstone of federal research.
At the White House, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said America led the postwar world on «all things nuclear» until we «stagnated» and «choked it with overregulation.»
«We’re going to have the lights on and AI operating when others are not because of our nuclear capabilities,» added Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
A senior White House official said on Friday there has been a decline in «disruptive research» and investments in biomedical research, along with «serious cases» of fraud and misconduct and the inability to reproduce scientific methods for the purpose of restoring public trust.
The official also blamed policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and «woke DEI initiatives» for endangering the public’s trust in government scientists.
CHINESE SOLAR TECH POSES CHILLING THREAT TO US ELECTRIC GRID, LAWMAKERS WARN
President Donald Trump is set to sign executive orders regarding nuclear energy. (Getty)
Now-retired NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci was repeatedly denounced for flip-flopping and obfuscating during his time engineering the federal response to COVID-19, leading many particularly on the right to disregard and dismiss the legitimacy of federal health authorities outright.
That order cites the fact the Biden administration included political edits from teachers unions in school-reopening guidance, instead of leading with any scientific evidence.
The order will enforce «gold standard science,» defined as reproducible, transparent and falsifiable – as well as being subject to peer review and making sure that scientists are not discouraged from discovering outcomes that run counter to a narrative.
In terms of nuclear energy, one order will reform nuclear R&D at the Energy Department, accelerate reactor testing at national labs and establish a pilot program for new construction.
TRUMP ADMIN HITS BULLSEYE WITH FIRST US MINE FOR KEY MINERAL
Energy Secretary Chris Wright previously told Fox News Digital that revitalizing and highlighting the work of U.S. national labs is paramount to his agenda.
In a move that appears to support Wright’s push for nuclear power, Trump will sign an order aimed at advancing new reactor construction on public lands.
CHRIS WRIGHT CONFIRMED SECRETARY OF ENERGY
A senior White House official cited the importance of that type of reliable power-source for critical defense facilities and AI data centers.
Another order being signed Friday will overhaul the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to require it to rule on reactor license applications within 18 months.
Only two new nuclear reactors have begun construction and entered into commercial operation since the Carter administration.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
A typically risk-averse culture that requires, for example, nuclear facilities to emit as little radiation as possible, including below naturally-occurring levels, which critics said has hindered the NRC from licensing new reactors as technology begets safer and cheaper means of production.
The orders will also seek to raise nuclear energy capacity from 100 gigawatts (GW) to 400 GW within 25 years.
Another order will establish a vision to mine and enrich uranium within the U.S., decreasing another avenue of foreign reliance – and «reinvigorate» the nuclear fuel cycle.
«That means America will start mining and enriching uranium and expanding domestic uranium conversion and enrichment capacity,» a senior White House official said.
Trump is expected to leverage the Defense Production Act – which last helped secure COVID-19 paraphernalia like masks and ventilators – to seek agreements with domestic nuclear energy companies for the procurement of enriched uranium, as well as finding ways to manage spent nuke fuel.
Nuclear energy, the White House said in the order, «is necessary to power the next generation technologies that secure our global industrial, digital, and economic dominance, achieve energy independence, and protect our national security.»
Joe Dominguez, of Constellation Energy; one of the stakeholders in the orders, said nuclear energy is a «24/7 resource.»
«These data centers run 24/7 00 some of them will cost $200-300 billion, …[so] we can’t use intermittent resources,» Dominguez said. «If you can’t get the plant on, you can’t get revenue.»
One of the orders also creates a special U.S. envoy for nuclear experts.
In the midst of applying his signature, Trump quipped, «could I use an auto-pen… what did Biden do?»
Politics,Science,US Energy,Anthony Fauci,White House,Donald Trump
INTERNACIONAL
Israeli diplomat blasts ‘staged walkout’ ahead of Netanyahu speech, talks holiday scheduling controversy
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Israel’s top diplomat at the United Nations dismissed delegates who walked out before Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address and blasted the international body for holding key Middle East talks during a Jewish holiday, leaving Jerusalem’s delegation without representation.
«It was a staged walkout. Most of the people were not diplomats. They were staffers from hostile missions,» Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon told Fox News Digital.
He noted that Netanyahu was the first speaker of the day, meaning the diplomats who stormed out of the hall arrived only to participate in the walkout.
«I told them, ‘get out and don’t come back,’ and I meant it. If they cannot listen to the words of the prime minister representing Israel and the Jewish people, I don’t think they have a place in this hall,» he said.
UN DELEGATES WALK OUT OF NETANYAHU ADDRESS AFTER CHEERING PALESTINIAN LEADER DAY BEFORE
Delegations walk out as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) at U.N. headquarters in New York City on Sept. 26, 2025. (Shannon Stapleton/Reuters)
Danon added that most delegations stayed in the room and respected both Netanyahu and the state of Israel.
Netanyahu may have been speaking to a smaller audience within the hall, but his address was broadcast on speakers in Gaza and on Gazans’ cell phones, something the prime minister revealed while on stage. Danon said that the prime minister would often consider how to carry the message and the «brilliant idea» of broadcasting it so that the Palestinians could hear his speech was an extension of that.
Danon told Fox News Digital that Netanyahu’s address was not directed at Hamas leaders, who, he argued, «don’t care» and only understand the language of tanks and aircraft. Instead, he said, the message was meant for the people of Gaza and for the hostages who have been languishing in the enclave for nearly two years.
Danon also lamented that the U.N. scheduled key talks on the Middle East during the Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashanah.
«They had a discussion about the Middle East, about Israel, without Israel. I think it shows the hypocrisy of the United Nations,» Danon told Fox News Digital. «Some leaders care more about hearing themselves rather than actually rewarding a dialogue.»
Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon ahead of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech at the 80th session of The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on Sept. 26, 2025, in New York City. (Alexi J. Rosenfeld/Getty Images)
ISRAEL CALLS UN PUSH FOR PALESTINE STATEHOOD A ‘CHARADE,’ WARNS OF ‘CONSEQUENCES’ FOR RECOGNITION MOVES
Danon said that he spoke to the head of the U.N. Security Council about rescheduling the discussion but was not successful in getting the date changed. It is unclear which delegation was at the helm of the council, as it rotates monthly.
While Israel was not able to participate in talks during Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, it remained one of the central issues of the 80th session of the U.N. General Assembly. Israel also faced pressure outside official U.N. discussions, with several delegations moving to recognize a Palestinian state.
Danon dismissed the declarations of France, Australia, the United Kingdom and Canada recognizing Palestinian statehood as «empty.»
«We spoke with many delegations. Without naming names, we had successes that a few countries did not join this circus, those empty declarations, and we are grateful for that,» Danon said. He added that he believes «overall everybody knows that it’s not going anywhere.»
Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon speaks to members of the media before the U.N. Security Council meeting on Oct. 2, 2024. (REUTERS/Stephani Spindel)
NETANYAHU BROADCASTS UNITED NATIONS MESSAGE INTO GAZA ACCUSING WORLD LEADERS OF APPEASING ‘EVIL’
When asked why some delegations were so intent on recognition, he chalked it up to leaders needing domestic wins and using the Middle East conflict to galvanize supporters.
«I think they have domestic interests. Take, for example, President Macron. He has so many domestic problems and issues with the economy, with immigration, with the parliament. So, it’s easier for him to come to the U.N. and to pretend that he’s actually leading something. He knows better than that,» Danon said.
President Donald Trump hosted Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu at the White House as the pair looked to reach a peace deal in the Gaza war. ( Win McNamee/Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
On Monday, after meeting with President Donald Trump at the White House, Netanyahu accepted a U.S.-backed Gaza deal to end the nearly two-year-long war. French President Emmanuel Macron, who recognized a Palestinian state last week, said that he welcomed the plan and expected Israel to «engage resolutely on this basis.» He added that «Hamas has no choice but to immediately release all hostages and follow this plan.»
It remains to be seen whether Hamas will accept the deal and, if it does, whether it will stick to the terms.
israel,united nations,middle east
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The Trump administration on Monday said it has started a new process to block Harvard University’s eligibility for federal grant money and its ability to enter into new federal contracts — yet another salvo from Trump officials as they continue to target the nation’s oldest and wealthiest university.
The Department of Health and Human Services notified Harvard President Alan Garber in a letter Monday that it has initiated the debarment process for the university — a move that would render the school ineligible to receive federal grant money or enter into new federal contracts.
HHS officials cited allegations of antisemitism brought against the university and what Trump officials argued is the school’s failure to comply with recommendations from a federal antisemitism task force earlier this year.
FEDERAL JUDGE BLOCKS TRUMP ATTEMPT TO FREEZE MORE THAN $2 BILLION IN HARVARD FUNDS
Harvard President Alan Garber addresses the crowd during the university’s 373rd commencement ceremony. (Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)
The familiar refrain has been at the center of a months-long legal fight between Trump officials and Harvard lawyers, who sparred over efforts to comply with recommendations from a federal task force earlier this year.
Trump officials have argued the school has not done enough to comply with the task force recommendations; Harvard has countered that the effort amounts to an unconstitutional «pressure campaign» from the administration to influence and exert control over its academic programs.
It’s unclear how long the debarment process will take, and these efforts are often preceded by a shorter-term period of suspension, according to data from HHS’s Office for Civil Rights.
Still, if successful, the effort could threaten billions of dollars in funding for Harvard at an already vulnerable time for the university.
The debarment process, if successful, could eventually «blacklist» Harvard from doing business with the government in any capacity — including blocking its ability to accept billions in federal research funds and to sign new contracts with federal agencies.
CONTINUED COURT FIGHTS COULD PUT HARVARD IN UNWINNABLE POSITION VS TRUMP
Graduates celebrate during Harvard University’s 374th commencement ceremony on May 29, 2025. (Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)
Harvard’s lawyers have reportedly struggled to negotiate with the Trump administration in ongoing settlement talks, weeks after a judge in Boston sided with Harvard and ordered the administration to restore billions in funding to the school.
The news comes just weeks after a federal judge in Boston sided with Harvard in ruling that the Trump administration had acted illegally in freezing more than $2.2 billion in federal research funding that had been allocated to Harvard.
In an 84-page summary judgment earlier this month, U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs rejected the Trump administration’s assertion that it was attempting to strip Harvard of billions in federal funding due to allegations of antisemitism, or the university’s failure to comply with the recommendations of a federal antisemitism task force.
«A review of the administrative record makes it difficult to conclude anything other than that defendants used antisemitism as a smokescreen for a targeted, ideologically-motivated assault on this country’s premier universities,» Burroughs said in her decision.
HARVARD PRESIDENT SAYS HE HAS ‘NO CHOICE’ BUT TO FIGHT TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
Hundreds of graduates walk out of Harvard’s 2024 commencement in Harvard Yard to call attention to the plight of Palestinians on May 23, 2024, in Cambridge, Mass. (Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)
Harvard lawyers sued the Trump administration in April over its attempts to freeze billions in federal funding and block other grant money — which they argued in court amounts to an unconstitutional «pressure campaign» designed to influence and exert control over its academic programs.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The New York Times reported that the Trump administration is likely to appeal the ruling, though the time frame for the appeal and the next steps for challenging the summary judgment remain unclear.
politics,donald trump,white house,national security,education,federal courts
Chile avanza silenciosamente en un proyecto de infraestructura digital que podría tener implicaciones profundas para la soberanía de datos en América Latina. Se trata del llamado “Chile–China Express”, un cable submarino propuesto que conectaría las costas chilenas con Hong Kong. Aunque a simple vista podría parecer un emprendimiento técnico más en la expansión global de las telecomunicaciones, lo cierto es que este plan se diferencia por la opacidad con la que se lo ha manejado y por los riesgos que se desprenden de la legislación china en materia de seguridad cibernética e inteligencia. La discusión trasciende los límites de Chile, pues cualquier país que interconecte sus redes con ese tendido quedaría expuesto a las obligaciones que empresas chinas mantienen con el Estado de Pekín.
La pregunta de fondo es por qué Chile necesitaría otro cable transpacífico cuando ya se encuentra en marcha el Humboldt, un proyecto desarrollado por Google junto con la empresa estatal Desarrollo País y la Oficina de Correos y Telecomunicaciones de la Polinesia Francesa. El Humboldt, cuya traza conecta Valparaíso con Sídney pasando por Tahití, fue anunciado públicamente, con cronograma, inversión y socios claramente identificados.
En contraste, el Chile–China Express aparece en registros de la industria como una iniciativa “en progreso” a cargo de Inchcape/ISS, con escasa información disponible sobre su financiamiento, consorcio y términos contractuales. La ausencia de convocatoria abierta y el bajo nivel de transparencia constituyen la primera señal de alarma.
El problema central es que no se trata de un cable cualquiera, sino de un proyecto que coloca a China en posición de controlar nodos de transmisión estratégica. Desde 2017, China cuenta con un marco legal que obliga a empresas y ciudadanos a cooperar con los servicios de inteligencia. La Ley de Ciberseguridad (CSL) establece requisitos de almacenamiento local, auditoría y transferencia de datos para operadores de infraestructura crítica.
A su vez, la Ley de Inteligencia Nacional exige la colaboración activa de cualquier empresa, dentro y fuera del país, con las actividades de inteligencia del Estado. En la práctica, esto significa que datos que circulen por infraestructura gestionada por empresas chinas pueden ser puestos a disposición de Pekín sin que los usuarios ni los Estados interconectados tengan forma de impedirlo.
En el caso de Chile, la vulnerabilidad no se limita a su territorio. Argentina, Brasil, Uruguay, Paraguay, Perú o Ecuador podrían ver parte de su tráfico enrutado por el Chile–China Express. La naturaleza transnacional de los cables convierte a este proyecto en un asunto regional y no solo doméstico. Así como las decisiones de endeudamiento de Ecuador en la década pasada tuvieron consecuencias en toda la cuenca del Pacífico, pues influyeron en los flujos de petróleo hacia Asia–Pacífico, el control chino de la infraestructura digital en Chile podría comprometer la seguridad de datos de millones de latinoamericanos.
La opacidad no es nueva en los acuerdos con China. Un estudio de AidData analizó más de un centenar de contratos de deuda con países de América Latina y África y concluyó que incluyen cláusulas de confidencialidad extraordinarias, restricciones de divulgación y garantías de pago por fuera de los mecanismos multilaterales como el Club de París. Infobae documentó cómo, en Ecuador, los préstamos chinos estaban respaldados en la entrega de crudo y contenían condiciones poco usuales que limitaban la transparencia. El patrón es claro: la política exterior china recurre al secretismo como herramienta para blindar sus intereses.
A la dimensión jurídica se suma la dimensión de inteligencia. Informes de Safeguard Defenders han documentado la existencia de más de 50 “estaciones de policía” chinas en el extranjero, incluidas algunas en América Latina. Estas oficinas, presentadas como centros de servicios para ciudadanos chinos en el exterior, han sido denunciadas por operar como mecanismos de vigilancia y coerción sobre la diáspora, en ocasiones presionando a personas a regresar a China bajo amenazas. Varios gobiernos de Europa y América han abierto investigaciones. El cable submarino, en ese contexto, no puede analizarse de manera aislada: forma parte de un ecosistema de herramientas de control extraterritorial que combina infraestructura digital, presencia física y presión diplomática.
El discurso de las autoridades chinas suele presentarse en clave de beneficio económico inmediato. Inversiones en plantas industriales, promesas de generación de empleo y transferencia de tecnología acompañan a estos proyectos. Pero la experiencia chilena muestra que muchas de esas promesas se han quedado en el papel. En 2021, se anunciaron inversiones de la farmacéutica Sinovac en Antofagasta y Santiago, así como proyectos de BYD y Tsingshan para instalar plantas de baterías de litio. Años después, ninguno de esos planes se ha concretado plenamente; algunos han sido suspendidos, otros retirados. Reuters y El País han confirmado que al menos dos de esas iniciativas fueron canceladas o congeladas.
En contraste, los proyectos gestionados con empresas occidentales han mostrado mayor transparencia en su ejecución. El Humboldt de Google, con cronograma claro y participación de entidades estatales chilenas, ilustra una forma distinta de negociar, más cercana a los estándares internacionales de gobernanza. Esto no significa que los cables controlados por actores occidentales estén exentos de riesgos, pero sí que sus condiciones contractuales han sido más accesibles para el escrutinio público.
El debate sobre el Chile–China Express toca además un punto crucial: la gobernanza digital. Al igual que en las decisiones de endeudamiento externo, las democracias deben decidir si aceptan acuerdos que limitan su capacidad de control sobre sectores estratégicos. La transparencia es el primer requisito para tomar decisiones informadas, y su ausencia es el síntoma más evidente de que lo que está en juego no es solo conectividad, sino soberanía.
La Ley de Ciberseguridad de China (CSL) obliga a los operadores de infraestructura crítica a almacenar localmente los datos y a cooperar con las autoridades chinas en caso de solicitudes de seguridad nacional. Esto incluye el derecho del Estado a realizar auditorías y requerir la entrega de información.
En cambio, La Ley de Inteligencia Nacional es una norma que complementa la CSL al exigir que cualquier organización o ciudadano “apoye, asista y coopere” con la labor de inteligencia del Estado. La ley no distingue entre actividades domésticas y en el extranjero, lo que amplía el alcance de la obligación.
El Humboldt conecta Chile con Oceanía con socios identificados. El Chile–China Express aparece como proyecto en progreso con destino Hong Kong. La duplicidad de rutas hacia Asia, una con Estados Unidos y otra con China como actores principales, refleja la competencia geopolítica por controlar la infraestructura digital en la región.
El trasfondo es geoestratégico: para Pekín, la infraestructura digital es la nueva columna vertebral de su influencia global. El Decimocuarto Plan Quinquenal de Informatización Nacional lo establece de forma explícita: China aspira a dominar las telecomunicaciones mundiales, no solo como proveedor de equipos, sino como operador de los canales de transmisión . El cable Chile–China Express, más allá de su utilidad comercial, se inscribe en ese objetivo.
La dura advertencia de Flick a Lamine Yamal: «Debe centrarse en trabajar»
Israeli diplomat blasts ‘staged walkout’ ahead of Netanyahu speech, talks holiday scheduling controversy
Revelan que Mauro Icardi le fue infiel a la China Suárez con Zoe Bogach: “Le mandaba fotos desde una cuenta trucha”
Javier Milei y Mauricio Macri se reunieron en la Quinta de Olivos y planifican un nuevo encuentro para esta semana
Alerta para Caputo: empiezan a recalentarse los precios tras el regreso de la brecha del dólar
Los gremios del PAMI activan un paro de tres días para exigir una recomposición salarial
Mario Massaccesi confesó toda la verdad detrás de su fuerte pelea con Paula Bernini
Flor Jazmín Peña reveló la profunda crisis que tuvo por culpa de Nico Occhiato
Mirtha Legrand bloqueó a una famosa periodista en WhatsApp y ella está desesperada para que le vuelva a hablar
Francos apuntó al gobierno de Kicillof por el triple femicidio narco: “¿Qué dirá la gente que votó a Magario?»
POLITICA3 días agoFrancos apuntó al gobierno de Kicillof por el triple femicidio narco: “¿Qué dirá la gente que votó a Magario?»
- POLITICA2 días ago
Emilia Orozco: “Si vuelve el kirchnerismo, todo el esfuerzo que hicieron los argentinos se va a tirar a la basura”
- POLITICA3 días ago
Ciudad vs. provincia. Los recelos y los negocios que reveló el triple crimen de Florencio Varela
