Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Trump slams UK island handoff deal that could put key US military base at risk

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump dramatically reversed course Tuesday on a U.K. plan to transfer sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius while warning it could jeopardize U.S. access to the Diego Garcia military base.

Advertisement

Trump’s reversal highlights what a defense expert called a «new Trump Doctrine» before linking the president’s opposition to the Chagos deal with his Greenland push and citing fears Mauritius could later back out.

Writing on his Truth Social platform Tuesday, Trump called the U.K.’s Chagos decision «an act of great stupidity.»

«Shockingly, our ‘brilliant’ NATO Ally, the United Kingdom, is currently planning to give away the Island of Diego Garcia, the site of a vital U.S. Military Base, to Mauritius, and to do so FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER,» Trump wrote. «There is no doubt that China and Russia have noticed this act of total weakness.»

Advertisement

TRUMP ISSUES STERN WARNING TO NATO AHEAD OF VANCE’S HIGH-STAKES GREENLAND MEETING

President Trump linked the opposition to a Diego Garcia transfer with his push to acquire Greenland from Denmark. (Planet Labs PBC)

«Trump has done a 180, partly because of the U.K.’s support for Denmark’s sovereign claims over Greenland and partly because of a new strategy outlined by the White House,» John Hemmings, director of the National Security Center at the Henry Jackson Society, told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

«These moves are linked and part of a ‘new Trump Doctrine’» outlined in November’s National Security Strategy,» he explained.

«Diego Garcia is a potential threat to Beijing’s strategy to control vital shipping lanes between the oil-rich Middle East and China’s industrial heartland,» he added, describing how «nearly 23.7 million barrels of oil transit the Indian Ocean every day, with the base being vital in any U.S.-China conflict over Taiwan.»

TRUMP TELLS DAVOS US ALONE CAN SECURE GREENLAND, INSISTS HE WON’T ‘USE FORCE’

Advertisement
President Donald Trump speaks while addressing an audience at the World Economic Forum.

President Donald Trump addresses the audience during the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Wednesday, Jan. 21, 2026. (Evan Vucci/AP Photo)

In a separate post, Trump explicitly linked the Chagos dispute to his Greenland push.

«The U.K. giving away extremely important land is an act of GREAT STUPIDITY, and is another in a very long line of national security reasons why Greenland has to be acquired,» Trump wrote.

The Chagos Islands were separated from Mauritius during Britain’s decolonization process, a move the International Court of Justice ruled unlawful in 2019. 

Advertisement

The U.K. later agreed to transfer sovereignty while leasing Diego Garcia back for at least 99 years at a cost of at least $160 million annually.

Diego Garcia is a hub for long-range bombers, logistics and power projection across the Middle East, the Indo-Pacific and Africa. Around 2,500 personnel, mostly American, are stationed there.

TRUMP DOUBLES DOWN ON GREENLAND PUSH AS POLLS SHOW LITTLE PUBLIC SUPPORT

Advertisement
Diego Garcia

Diego Garcia, the largest island in the Chagos archipelago and site of a major United States military base in the middle of the Indian Ocean, was leased from the U.K. in 1966. (Reuters)

«If Mauritius were to offer the islands to China after taking de jure control, it would put immense pressure on the U.S. in the eyes of international public opinion,» Hemmings explained.

«After all, once Mauritius has de jure sovereignty, it can renegotiate the lease terms or even renege on the treaty at any time it wants.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«It might also provide access to the exclusive economic zone, with all of its rich fishing grounds, to Chinese fishing fleets, adding another layer of risk to U.S. Air Force operations around the island,» Hemmings said.

«At this moment, the U.S. base at Diego Garcia is thought to be secure, with Mauritius promising the U.K. (and by proxy, the U.S.) a 99-year lease, which will not, it is supposed, interfere with the operations of the air base at all. But the devil is in the details.»

Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House for comment.

Advertisement



treaties,white house,donald trump,greenland,foreign affairs,national security,taiwan

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Cómo la guerra de Trump contra Irán cambió el mundo en una semana

Published

on


BERLÍN — Desde que el presidente Donald Trump lanzó una nueva guerra contra Irán, la ha descrito como un ataque impactante y aterrador con pocas consecuencias duraderas, especialmente para los estadounidenses.

El lunes en Florida, la calificó de «breve interrupción«.

Advertisement

Los expertos dicen que rápidamente se está convirtiendo en algo completamente distinto:

una sacudida al orden de seguridad y a la economía global que supera con creces las provocadas por otros conflictos recientes en Medio Oriente.

La guerra de Trump, que ya lleva casi dos semanas, ya está transformando los patrones de viaje, la dependencia energética, el costo de la vida, las rutas comerciales y las alianzas estratégicas.

Advertisement

Países habitualmente protegidos de los conflictos regionales, como Chipre y los Emiratos Árabes Unidos, se han enfrentado al fuego iraní en represalia.

Las consecuencias podrían perturbar las elecciones de mitad de mandato en Estados Unidos, inclinar la balanza bélica en Ucrania y obligar a China a un importante giro económico.

Estos efectos podrían agravarse si Trump sigue adelante con la guerra, sobre todo si Irán intensifica sus contraataques y bloquea el tráfico marítimo a través del crucial paso petrolero del Estrecho de Ormuz.

Advertisement

Algunos economistas ya evocan un recuerdo temido para cualquier presidente estadounidense:

el espectro de la estanflación inducida por la crisis petrolera, con el estancamiento del crecimiento y el alza vertiginosa de los precios.

“Tengo la edad suficiente para recordar los acontecimientos de los años 70, y un mundo en el que las subidas repentinas del precio del petróleo eran un problema importante tanto a nivel económico como para un presidente que podría enfrentarse a elecciones”, dijo Suzanne Maloney, experta en Irán de la Brookings Institution.

Advertisement

“Eso no parece haberse tenido en cuenta en la toma de decisiones”, añadió.

La guerra está afectando de forma más inmediata y visceral a Oriente Medio.

Los ataques en toda la región han causado la muerte de más de 1.000 personas y graves daños a infraestructuras críticas y al medio ambiente, desatando columnas de humo nocivo y lluvia negra sobre Teherán, la capital iraní, tras los ataques israelíes contra depósitos de combustible.

Advertisement

El conflicto ha sacudido los cimientos de las economías del Golfo Pérsico, resquebrajando su imagen cuidadosamente cultivada de refugios seguros en una región turbulenta.

Irán ha lanzado más ataques contra los países del Golfo que contra Israel, según un observatorio de guerra estadounidense, atacando hoteles de cinco estrellas, dañando plantas desalinizadoras y obligando a los turistas a huir en busca de rutas de evacuación.

Los aeropuertos de Dubái y Abu Dabi, en los Emiratos Árabes Unidos, han sido objeto de ataques.

Advertisement

Las autoridades europeas siguen intentando rescatar a sus ciudadanos, que se han quedado varados en lo que antes parecían tranquilos destinos vacacionales.

El Departamento de Estado de EE.UU., tras recibir críticas iniciales por actuar con demasiada lentitud, afirmó haber organizado más de dos docenas de vuelos chárter y haber evacuado a miles de estadounidenses de Oriente Medio.

Daños

Advertisement

Los expertos advierten que el daño a la reputación persistirá en el Golfo. Más allá de la riqueza que poseen esos países, «la verdadera moneda de cambio era la confianza», afirmó Emile Hokayem, experto en Oriente Medio del Instituto Internacional de Estudios Estratégicos, en una mesa redonda esta semana.

“No se trataba solo del dinero, sino del hecho de que podían decirle a la gente, con realismo, que es un buen ambiente de negocios y que se sentirán seguros”, dijo.

“Somos inmunes a la política regional. Pueden invertir aquí. Pueden usarnos para su comercio, sus aerolíneas, sus comunicaciones, su tecnología, etc. Y eso es lo que buscan los iraníes, ¿verdad?”

Advertisement

Para gran parte del resto del mundo, uno de los primeros efectos de la guerra se sintió en las estaciones de servicio.

Cuando los petroleros dejaron de transitar por el estrecho de Ormuz, los precios del petróleo superaron los 100 dólares por barril en los mercados globales, aunque han bajado ligeramente en los últimos días.

El presidente francés, Emmanuel Macron, anunció el lunes que su país enviaría 10 buques de guerra a la región, posiblemente para escoltar buques a través del estrecho.

Advertisement

Funcionarios de la administración Trump y líderes europeos han explorado opciones en los últimos días para reducir los precios de la estación de servicio, que han aumentado junto con el precio global del petróleo.

Los economistas han comenzado a advertir que, si la crisis del petróleo persiste durante semanas, podría desencadenar una escalada de aumentos de precios en todas las economías, arrastrando así el crecimiento económico, un destino similar a la estanflación que siguió a la revolución iraní de 1979.

“Que la historia se repita dependerá de cuánto dure este conflicto”, escribieron esta semana investigadores del Deutsche Bank.

Advertisement

Efectos

La pérdida de acceso a petróleo barato es un riesgo emergente para China, y no el único.

Los exportadores chinos dependen cada vez más de los consumidores de Oriente Medio.

Advertisement

Una perturbación en las economías de Oriente Medio podría limitar las ventas de productos chinos allí, socavando así el propio crecimiento de China.

El aumento de los precios del petróleo, por el contrario, beneficia a Rusia, al aumentar los ingresos petroleros que contribuyen a financiar la maquinaria bélica de Moscú en Ucrania.

A los europeos también les preocupa que los intensos combates en Oriente Medio perjudiquen indirectamente las defensas ucranianas: cuantos más misiles interceptores utilicen Estados Unidos y sus aliados para contrarrestar a Irán, menos tendrá Ucrania a su disposición para defenderse de los ataques rusos.

Advertisement

En Estados Unidos, la guerra ya parece ser un lastre político para Trump.

Cuenta con relativamente poco apoyo público en comparación con guerras anteriores.

Los demócratas están aprovechando el aumento de los costos de la energía para cortejar a los votantes antes de las elecciones de mitad de mandato, que ya se centraban en el aumento del costo de la vida.

Advertisement

De manera más inmediata, ha ensombrecido un evento que Trump esperaba que fuera un triunfo estadounidense emblemático bajo su presidencia:

la Copa Mundial de fútbol masculino, que comenzará este verano en Estados Unidos, Canadá y México.

Irán es uno de los equipos programados para competir.

Advertisement

Pero no está claro si su equipo podrá participar, ni qué podría suceder si no lo logra.

En público, Trump ha pregonado el poderío militar que Estados Unidos e Israel han invertido en la guerra, al tiempo que ofrece explicaciones variables sobre las causas de los ataques contra Irán y plazos variables para su posible finalización.

Ha reconocido algunos costos de la guerra, incluyendo la pérdida de militares estadounidenses desde su inicio.

Advertisement

El presidente ha desestimado en gran medida otras desventajas, como el aumento del precio del petróleo, considerándolas temporales.

Ha alarmado a sus aliados al ofrecer pocos planes concretos sobre cómo funcionará el gobierno iraní después de la guerra.

Dudas

Advertisement

En Europa, esto ha suscitado la preocupación de que la economía iraní se desplome y que, con el tiempo, pueda impulsar nuevas oleadas de migrantes a través de la frontera entre Irán y Turquía.

Para los europeos, esto evoca recuerdos de la crisis migratoria del continente de hace una década, cuando los conflictos y la pobreza en Oriente Medio y África llevaron a más de un millón de personas a buscar refugio en Europa, lo que provocó una reacción violenta de la derecha en países como Alemania.

“Estados Unidos e Israel llevan más de una semana librando una guerra contra Irán. Compartimos muchos de sus objetivos”, declaró el martes el canciller alemán Friedrich Merz.

Advertisement

“Pero con cada día que dura la guerra, surgen más preguntas. Nos preocupa especialmente que no parezca haber un plan común para concluir esta guerra de forma rápida y convincente”.

c.2026 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

China passes ‘ethnic unity’ law in push for assimilation

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

China’s top legislature on Thursday passed an «Ethnic Unity and Progress Promotion Law,» formalizing Beijing’s long-running push to strengthen national identity and ethnic integration.

Advertisement

The legislation was approved at the closing meeting of the fourth session of the 14th National People’s Congress during its annual parliamentary gathering in Beijing.

State-affiliated media Xinhua previously reported that the law would seek to codify «fostering a strong sense of community for the Chinese nation» into state policy. 

It would also bolster high-quality development in areas with large ethnic minority populations and promote what officials describe as common prosperity among China’s 56 ethnic groups.

Advertisement

CHINESE UNDERGROUND CHURCH PASTOR, FATHER OF US CITIZENS, DETAINED BY AUTHORITIES, FAMILY SAYS

Ethnic minority delegates arrive for the opening session of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, March 4, 2026. (Vincent Thian/AP)

Li Hongzhong, vice chairman of the NPC Standing Committee, said the measure was aimed at advancing the governance of ethnic affairs under the rule of law.

Advertisement

«The people of each ethnic group, all organizations and groups of the country, armed forces, every Party and social organization, every company, must forge a common consciousness of the Chinese nation according to law and the constitution, and take the responsibility of building this consciousness,» the proposed law reads, according to a translation from The Associated Press.

Academics and outside observers say the provision could undermine the cultural identity of ethnic minorities by requiring the use of Mandarin in compulsory education and establishing a legal basis to pursue individuals or organizations outside China whose actions are deemed to undermine «ethnic unity,» the AP reported.

TRUMP SAYS IT’S AN ‘HONOR’ TO KEEP STRAIT OF HORMUZ OPEN FOR CHINA AND OTHER COUNTRIES

Advertisement
Chinese President Xi Jinping stands with senior leaders as they applaud during a legislative session inside Beijing’s Great Hall of the People.

Xi Jinping, China’s president, center, applauds during the closing session of the National People’s Congress at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, March 12, 2026. (Qilai Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

China’s population stands at 1.44 billion as of November 2020, according to the Seventh National Population Census released in 2021 by the National Bureau of Statistics.

Of that total, 91.11% were Han Chinese and 8.89% belonged to ethnic minority groups.

CRUZ LEADS SENATE PUSH TO HOLD CHINA ACCOUNTABLE FOR BEIJING CHURCH CRACKDOWN

Advertisement
Delegates in traditional attire respond during a high-level political advisory meeting inside Beijing’s Great Hall of the People.

Delegates wearing traditional clothing react at the closing session of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference in Beijing, March 11, 2026. (Kevin Frayer/Getty)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

James Leibold, a professor at Australia’s La Trobe University, told the AP the new measure «puts a death nail in the party’s original promise of meaningful autonomy.»

Rayhan Asat, a legal scholar at Harvard University, also criticized the law, saying it «serves as a strategic tool and gives the pretext to government to commit all sorts of human rights violations.»

Advertisement



china,world,human rights

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Powell’s behind-the-scenes move after Trump’s DOJ opened its criminal probe

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell moved quickly behind the scenes after the Justice Department opened a criminal probe into his statements to Congress, with his calendar showing a burst of outreach to U.S. lawmakers.

Advertisement

The entries don’t reveal what was discussed, but they show Powell made 13 calls to senators and House members shortly after he accused the DOJ of using subpoenas as a «pretext» to ramp up pressure on the central bank to cut rates. The rapid-fire calls ranged from 10 to 15 minutes each. 

The Fed releases Powell’s monthly schedule with about a two-month lag, which is why the scope of that outreach is only now coming into view.

TRUMP’S PICK TO LEAD THE FEDERAL RESERVE MEETS GOP SENATOR HOLDING UP HIS CONFIRMATION

Advertisement

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell’s calendar showing some of his phone calls with members of Congress. (Federal Reserve/Amanda Macias/Fox News Digital)

Powell’s calendar lists calls with Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska; Shelley Moore Capito, R-W. Va.; Mark Warner, D-Va.; Bill Cassidy, R-La.; John Kennedy, R-La.; Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.; Mike Crapo, R-Idaho; James Lankford, R-Okla.; and Tim Scott, R-S.C., as well as Reps. Joyce Beatty, D-Ohio; Maxine Waters, D-Calif.; Steny Hoyer, D-Md.; and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.

Powell’s schedule also lists a breakfast meeting with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Jan. 15, four days after the investigation was disclosed.

Advertisement

Working Capitol Hill has long been central to Powell’s playbook, with the Fed chair regularly logging more one-on-one time with lawmakers than any modern predecessor. 

DOJ’S CRIMINAL PROBE OF FED CHAIR POWELL SPARKS RARE GOP REVOLT ON CAPITOL HILL

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell attends a conference in Washington, DC.

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell held phone calls with lawmakers in the days after the Justice Department announced its probe. (Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Still, the week of Jan. 11 stood out even for Powell. The last time he reached more lawmakers in a single week was February 2025, ahead of his semiannual testimony, when he typically schedules a run of prehearing calls with key members.

Advertisement

This burst was different, though it followed Powell’s Jan. 11 disclosure that the Justice Department had opened a criminal investigation tied to his congressional testimony on the Federal Reserve’s two historic main buildings on the National Mall.

Powell, in a rare video statement, called the probe «unprecedented» and described it as another salvo in what he described as President Donald Trump’s pressure campaign on the central bank to cut rates. The unusually public response followed days of private consultations with advisors and stood out for a Fed chair known for a measured approach.

The investigation centers on Powell’s June 2025 testimony to lawmakers, an unusual development for a sitting Fed chair.

Advertisement

TRUMP VS THE FEDERAL RESERVE: HOW THE CLASH REACHED UNCHARTED TERRITORY

The atrium of the Federal Reserve building under construction.

The grand atrium of the Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve building is under construction on July 24, 2025. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Testifying before the Senate Banking Committee, Powell said: «There’s no new marble. There are no special elevators. They’re old elevators that have been there. There are no new water features. There are no beehives, and there’s no roof garden terraces.»

Powell added that no one «wants to do a major renovation of a historic building during their term in office,» and said cost overruns were driven in part by unexpected construction challenges and inflation.

Advertisement

The renovation is estimated to cost $2.5 billion and is being funded by the central bank itself, not by taxpayers.

The Fed is self-financing and does not rely on congressional appropriations to cover its operating expenses, which include employee salaries, facilities maintenance and the current renovation. Its primary income comes from interest earned on government securities and fees charged to financial institutions.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement
President Donald Trump speaks to Fed Chair Jerome Powell at Federal Reserve construction site

President Donald Trump nominated Powell to lead the Federal Reserve in 2017. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump has repeatedly targeted the project, threatening legal action and mocking the renovation’s cost and design.

«They’re building a basement into the Potomac River. I could have told them. That’s very tough to do, and it doesn’t work, and it’s very expensive,» Trump said. «But they’re up to $4 billion, headed by this clown,» he added in November, referring to Powell.

Powell, a Trump nominee first tapped to lead the Fed in 2017, is expected to finish his term at the end of May. Trump has picked former Fed governor Kevin Warsh to replace Powell, but the nomination is effectively stuck after Sen. Thom Tillis vowed to block any Fed nominees while the DOJ probe remains open.

Advertisement

The Federal Reserve declined to comment on Powell’s calendar.

federal reserve,economy,scott bessent,donald trump,congress,politics

Continue Reading

Tendencias