Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Trump’s NATO deal to arm Ukraine wins over GOP skeptics

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Lawmakers long opposed to providing aid to Ukraine are now on board, if cautiously. President Donald Trump’s plan to assist the war effort comes with a twist because Washington won’t pay for the weapons sent to Kyiv. 

Advertisement

Months after calling Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy a «dictator» and questioning whether he even wanted to end the war with Russia, Trump has seemingly pivoted his frustrations to President Vladimir Putin. 

Now, the U.S. will provide weapons to Ukraine using European money. 

Even Vice President JD Vance is supportive of the move. 

Advertisement

NATO CHIEF PRAISES TRUMP’S WEAPONS SALES TO ALLIES AS ‘SIGNIFICANT’ MOVE THAT COULD FORCE PUTIN TO NEGOTIATE

At a White House meeting Monday with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Trump said a «very big deal» had been agreed to by Europeans to purchase «billions of dollars’ worth of military equipment» for Ukraine. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

«Vice President Vance completely supports President Trump’s plan to save American taxpayers from indefinitely funding the conflict in Ukraine and remains committed to the president’s goal of ending the bloodshed in Eastern Europe,» a Vance spokesperson told Fox News Digital. 

Advertisement

«While Joe Biden stupidly sent billions of American tax dollars to Ukraine, President Trump put America first and smartly struck a deal that puts the onus on our allies in Europe to pay for the aid to Ukraine.»

Under the Biden administration, Vance struck a different tone. 

TRUMP SAYS US WILL SEND PATRIOT MISSILES TO UKRAINE, ADDS THAT PUTIN ‘TALKS NICE AND THEN HE BOMBS EVERYBODY’

Advertisement

«This is not just a matter of dollars. Fundamentally, we lack the capacity to manufacture the amount of weapons Ukraine needs us to supply to win the war,» he wrote in a New York Times op-ed last year. «The Biden administration has no viable plan for the Ukrainians to win this war.»

Less than two years ago, House Republicans ousted Speaker Kevin McCarthy over a «secret side deal» to fund Ukraine. Months later, Speaker Mike Johnson risked the same fate over a Ukraine package that most of his members voted down. 

But last week, Trump abruptly undid a Pentagon review that paused weapons shipments to Ukraine.  Now, with Trump’s new Europe pays model, the weapons are flowing, and the resistance is fading.

Advertisement
Ukrainian soldiers in ukraine

Ukrainian soldiers from the 115th Brigade Mortar Unit conduct mortar training as members of the Anti-UAV unit test an FPV drone inhibitor in Lyman, Ukraine. (Jose Colon/Anadolu via Getty Images)

After repeatedly criticizing Zelenskyy and casting doubt on Ukraine’s war goals, Trump now says Putin may not be serious about peace. 

«We get a lot of bulls— thrown at us by Putin,» Trump said during a recent Cabinet meeting. «He’s very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.»

The about-face has given Republican holdouts cover to reframe their positions — even if they remain skeptical. 

Advertisement

«I think they’re going to have to justify it, why now?» said Ralph Norman, R-S.C., who voted against all Ukraine supplemental funding packages. 

«When Biden was doing it, he didn’t know what he was doing. It was just money going to all different directions,» he added. «But there’ll be a lot of debate on it, as it should be.»

The successful strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites were a win for interventionism, some lawmakers say, and have seemingly quieted isolationist sentiment. 

Advertisement

«I trust the generals right now,» Norman said when asked whether he believed more weapons would prolong or shorten the war. «They would do the right thing in Ukraine.» 

SENATE MOVES TO REIN IN TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S FLUCTUATING UKRAINE POLICYFreshman Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, said he still saw Trump’s policy as a return to «realism and restraint.» 

«Many people in this country have been burned by an overzealous foreign policy,» Gill said. «Getting involved in conflicts abroad without any understanding of what a path to peace would look like, what victory really means. And President Trump is reining that in.

Advertisement

«He’s doing things a little bit differently, is getting NATO on board, and that’s a good thing.»

In March, when the administration paused military aid, Gill had celebrated Trump «driving a knife right through the foreign policy UniParty.» 

Not everyone is on board. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, one of the president’s staunchest supporters who also spearheaded the effort to oust Johnson over Ukraine funding, suggested Americans were focused on affordability rather than aiding the war effort. 

Advertisement

«We do not want to give or sell weapons to Ukraine or be involved in any foreign wars or continue the never ending flow of foreign aid. We want to solve our own problems plaguing our own people,» she wrote on X. 

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., leaves the Capitol Hill Club after a meeting of the House Republican Conference on Tuesday, March 25, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., called the new U.S.-NATO plan for Ukraine aid «great.» 

«I think more weapons will shorten [the war,]» he said. «We’re looking at NATO purchasing weapons from us. That’s a good thing right there.» 

Advertisement

«Putin needs to understand that our patience is running short. And he needs to understand it’s Vladimir Putin against the world,» said Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wis.

Last year, Van Orden railed against the Biden administration for failing to provide a plan to end the war. This time, the idea of Europe footing the bill seems to have sold him. 

«Europe has to step up and do the preponderance of their own defense,» he told Fox News Digital. 

Advertisement

Van Orden blamed the invasion on European NATO allies failing to meet their 2% goal for defense spending. 

«If the members of NATO had gone to 2% of GDP ten years ago when they promised to, do you think Vladimir Putin would have invaded Ukraine?» Van Orden wondered.

ukraine

A resident walks among the debris near a damaged house a day after a Russian strike on a suburb of Odesa, southern Ukraine, March 7, 2025, during the Russian invasion of Ukraine. (Oleksandr Gimanova/AFP via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

At a White House meeting Monday with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Trump said a «very big deal» had been agreed to by Europeans to purchase.

«Billions of dollars’ worth of military equipment is going to be purchased from the United States, going to NATO … And that’s going to be quickly distributed to the battlefield,» Trump said.

Trump said the package would be comprehensive, including Patriot missile batteries that Ukraine needs for air defenses. 

Advertisement

«It’s everything. It’s Patriots. It’s all of them. It’s a full complement with the batteries,» Trump said.

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Top Republican slams Katherine Clark for admitting suffering families are ‘leverage’ in shutdown battle

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

EXCLUSIVE: A top House Republican is criticizing one of Democrats’ senior leaders for saying the government shutdown and its effects are a «leverage point» to accomplish their goals on healthcare.

Advertisement

«It’s appalling to see the number two House Democrat openly admit that the left is weaponizing hardworking Americans as ‘leverage’ for political gain, even acknowledging families will suffer in the process,» Republican Study Committee Chair August Pfluger, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital.

«This isn’t governance — it’s calculated hostage-taking, with struggling families caught in the balance as Democrats attempt to force through their radical agenda. Families are seen only as leverage by Democrats. We always knew it, now they’re saying it out loud. Absolutely shameful.»

House Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., sat down for an interview with Fox News’ Chad Pergram last week. At one point, Clark was asked about who Americans would find responsible for the ongoing shutdown.

Advertisement

BATTLEGROUND REPUBLICANS HOLD THE LINE AS JOHNSON PRESSURES DEMS ON SHUTDOWN

Republican Study Committee Chairman August Pfluger is criticizing House Minority Whip Katherine Clark’s comments in a recent interview on the government shutdown. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images; Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

«I mean, shutdowns are terrible and, of course, there will be, you know, families that are going to suffer. We take that responsibility very seriously. But it is one of the few leverage times we have,» Clark responded.

Advertisement

«It is an inflection point in this budget process where we have tried to get the Republicans to meet with us and prioritize the American people, and it’s been an absolute refusal, and they were willing to let government shut down when they control the House, the Senate and the White House rather than come and talk about an issue as important to the American people is if they can afford healthcare.»

Fox News Digital reached out to Clark’s office for a response to Pfluger’s comments.

Capitol building with falling money

The government is in a shutdown after Congress failed to reach an agreement on federal funding. (Getty Images)

The government shutdown is now in its 23rd day after Senate Democrats rejected the GOP’s federal funding bill for a 12th time on Wednesday evening.

Advertisement

Republicans proposed a measure that would keep federal funding roughly flat until Nov. 21, a spending patch called a continuing resolution (CR), so that negotiators would have more time to strike a longer-term deal on fiscal year (FY) 2026.

The bill passed the House largely along partisan lines on Sept. 19.

But Democrats have been pushing for any funding deal to include an extension of Obamacare subsidies that were enhanced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Those enhancements are set to expire at the end of 2025.

Advertisement

Republican leaders have signaled a willingness to negotiate on those subsidies, but have ruled out doing so in the current package.

SCREAMING MATCH ERUPTS BETWEEN HAKEEM JEFFRIES, MIKE LAWLER AS GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN CHAOS CONTINUES

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on the 10th day of the federal government shutdown in Washington, Oct. 10, 2025. (Alex Wroblewski/AFP via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«Mike Johnson said, we have an eternity to talk about this, an eternity. This impact of the ACA is in the next few weeks,» Clark said. «Yes, there are repercussions to a shutdown that are terrible for people.»

She continued, «I feel for military families that even if they get paid, you know, there are lots of spouses that also work that are feeling these cuts because we’ve encouraged military spouses to become federal workers to accommodate all the travel and moving that military families so frequently experience. And now we’re saying to them, you’re not going to be paid for your work. I mean, let’s get it together here. The Republicans need to come to town. They need to sit down with us.»

Republicans have seized on Clark’s comments in recent days, however.

Advertisement

House GOP Chairwoman Lisa McClain, R-Mich., said in a statement on Wednesday, «Democrats are holding American families hostage to advance their political agenda, and they’re admitting it.»

house of representatives politics,politics,republicans,government shutdown

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Los submarinos que contrabandean cocaína a través de océanos y mares

Published

on


GUAYAQUIL, Ecuador — El comandante de la guardia costera de Ecuador observaba con una mirada derrotada el submarino que había sido utilizado para transportar drogas, exhausto por los interminables esfuerzos de interdicción que parecen no llevar a ninguna parte, con sus marineros arriesgando sus vidas mientras la cocaína sigue fluyendo.

Los traficantes de drogas, dijo, siempre iban muchos pasos por delante.

Advertisement

La Armada ecuatoriana tiene dos submarinos en su flota.

Nadie lo sabe con certeza, pero sin duda son muchos más.

En los últimos 15 años, Ecuador ha capturado alrededor de una docena de embarcaciones semisumergibles y sumergibles.

Advertisement

Las autoridades estadounidenses creen que solo una pequeña fracción de estas embarcaciones ha sido interceptada a nivel mundial.

Estábamos en la extensa base naval a lo largo del paseo marítimo de Guayaquil, la ciudad más poblada de Ecuador, observando los barcos narcotraficantes incautados por la marina, algunos con la ayuda de la DEA (Administración para el Control de Drogas) de Estados Unidos.

Era un cementerio de barcos pesqueros asoleados, embarcaciones semisumergibles y un enorme submarino metálico.

Advertisement
Un buque semisumergible en exhibición en una base naval de Guayaquil, Ecuador, el 19 de octubre de 2025. Los buques semisumergibles y totalmente sumergibles son más difíciles de detectar, ya que se mimetizan con el agua. (Daniele Volpe/The New York Times)

La disposición de los buques era un testimonio de la astucia de los cárteles a la hora de idear formas de transportar drogas por todo el mundo.

La semana pasada, el ejército estadounidense atacó un semisumergible en el Caribe que, según afirmaba, transportaba cocaína.

Dos personas murieron, pero hubo dos sobrevivientes, entre ellos un ecuatoriano que fue repatriado.

Advertisement

El ataque forma parte de la campaña de la administración Trump para destruir embarcaciones que, según afirma, transportan drogas.

(El miércoles, anunció haber atacado una embarcación frente a las costas de Colombia, la primera vez que se produce un ataque de este tipo en el Pacífico).

Muchos expertos dicen que los ataques estadounidenses violan el derecho internacional.

Advertisement

Transporte

Los destartalados barcos pesqueros y las lanchas rápidas todavía transportan cantidades importantes de cocaína desde América del Sur a los Estados Unidos, pero los barcos semisumergibles surgieron en la década de 1990 como una forma de intentar evadir a las autoridades estadounidenses.

Normalmente, la mayor parte de la embarcación se encuentra bajo la superficie del agua, con una cabina de fibra de vidrio justo encima para facilitar la navegación.

Advertisement

Las embarcaciones suelen tener una tripulación de hasta cuatro personas, miden aproximadamente 15 metros de eslora y tienen capacidad para dos toneladas de cocaína, según la Armada de Ecuador.

La guardia costera ecuatoriana estimó que la construcción de un semisumergible incautado costó alrededor de un millón de dólares. En comparación, una tonelada de cocaína puede alcanzar los 25 millones de dólares en Estados Unidos.

A mediados de la década de 2000, las armadas de Sudamérica comenzaron a ver submarinos de pleno derecho, como el enorme buque de 27,5 metros de eslora que se encuentra en la base naval de Guayaquil.

Advertisement

Fue descubierto en 2010, su construcción costó unos 2 millones de dólares y podía transportar hasta 10 toneladas de cocaína, según el comandante de la Guardia Costera.

Después de que algunas fuerzas del orden comenzaron a utilizar cámaras termográficas para detectar embarcaciones bajo el agua, los narcotraficantes comenzaron a cubrirlas con plomo y las equiparon con dispositivos de enfriamiento para ayudar a ocultar sus señales de calor, según Insight Crime, una organización de investigación.

La potencia y el alcance de los submarinos también han aumentado con los años.

Advertisement

Al principio, solo podían contrabandear drogas de Sudamérica a Centroamérica.

Ahora, pueden atravesar los océanos Pacífico y Atlántico y llegar hasta Europa, África y Australia, recorriendo miles de kilómetros sin repostar.

Ecuador se ha convertido en un actor importante en el tráfico mundial de drogas.

Advertisement

Alrededor del 70% de la cocaína mundial fluye a través del país.

No es un centro de producción, pero Ecuador limita con Colombia, el mayor productor mundial de cocaína, y los concurridos puertos de Guayaquil, que envían banano, pescado y camarones al mundo, representan una oportunidad lucrativa para los cárteles.

La costa ecuatoriana y el Pacífico en general son los principales destinos de la cocaína mundial, no el Caribe, según datos de Estados Unidos y la ONU.

Advertisement

La cocaína también ha impulsado un aumento de la violencia allí, convirtiendo a Ecuador, de ser el país más seguro de Latinoamérica, en uno de los más peligrosos.

Un semisumergible en exhibición en una base naval de Guayaquil, Ecuador, el 19 de octubre de 2025. Una exhibición de embarcaciones confiscadas en una base naval de Ecuador ofrece un vistazo a por qué es tan difícil detener el narcotráfico. (Daniele Volpe/The New York Times)Un semisumergible en exhibición en una base naval de Guayaquil, Ecuador, el 19 de octubre de 2025. Una exhibición de embarcaciones confiscadas en una base naval de Ecuador ofrece un vistazo a por qué es tan difícil detener el narcotráfico. (Daniele Volpe/The New York Times)

Mientras entrevistaba al comandante de la guardia costera —cuyo nombre The New York Times no revela por razones de seguridad— estallaron fuegos artificiales a poca distancia.

“Eso lo hacen cada vez que un cargamento llega a su destino”, dijo con un suspiro, refiriéndose a la pandilla que controla el barrio colindante con la base.

Amenaza

Advertisement

Un modesto muro de ladrillo coronado con alambre de púas flexible era lo único que separaba la base naval más grande de Ecuador del extenso y empobrecido barrio, controlado por Los Lobos, uno de los grupos narcotraficantes más poderosos del país.

La banda colabora estrechamente con cárteles mexicanos y grupos del crimen organizado albaneses e italianos para contrabandear cocaína por todo el mundo, según funcionarios estadounidenses, europeos y ecuatorianos.

El mes pasado Los Lobos fueron designados como organización terrorista por el Departamento de Estado de Estados Unidos.

Advertisement

Le pregunté al comandante de la guardia costera si estaba nervioso por estar al lado del mismo enemigo contra el cual luchaban sus fuerzas, si alguna vez le preocupaba que miembros de Los Lobos escalaran los muros para atacar a sus marineros o sabotear su equipo.

“A veces”, dijo, encogiéndose de hombros y con una expresión de “¿qué se le va a hacer?” en el rostro.

c.2025 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Louvre director grilled on spectacular security failures, including camera pointing away from key balcony

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The director of Paris’ iconic Louvre Museum is facing scrutiny over apparent security failures that allowed thieves to make off with more than $100 million worth of jewels.

Advertisement

In her first public address since the heist, Louvre Museum director Laurence des Cars acknowledged there was a «terrible failure» and said, «Despite our efforts, despite our hard work on a daily basis, we failed,» The Guardian reported.

Des Cars admitted that security around the Louvre’s perimeter was an issue and that the only camera monitoring the outside of the museum was facing away from the balcony that led to the gallery where the precious jewels were kept, according to reports. The Guardian also noted that des Cars confirmed all the museum’s alarms were functioning during the burglary.

LOUVRE HEIST ADDS TO HISTORY OF HIGH-PROFILE MUSEUM BREACHES, LEAVES OTHER GALLERIES ON EDGE

Advertisement

Louvre Museum director Laurence des Cars made her first public remarks since the recent jewelry heist at a press conference on Oct. 22, 2025, in Paris, France. (Edward Berthelot/Getty Images)

«We failed these jewels,» des Cars said, according to the BBC. The outlet also quoted the director as saying that no one is safe from «brutal thieves — not even the Louvre.»

On Sunday, burglars appeared to use a truck-mounted electric furniture lift to conduct the heist, Laure Beccuau, the Paris prosecutor, said in an interview with RTL radio, according to The New York Times. She added that the thieves obtained the lift by pretending it was for a move. Additionally, Beccuau noted that it would not be easy for burglars to sell the stolen jewels for what they’re worth if they tear the pieces apart or melt them, according to the Times.

Advertisement
Police and moving lift outside the Louvre Museum following jewel heist in Paris.

Police secure the area outside the Louvre Museum in Paris, where burglars used a truck-mounted moving lift to reach a second floor window and steal royal jewelry valued at more than $100 million. (Dimitar DILKOFF / AFP)

HOW LOUVRE BURGLARS OBTAINED TRUCK-MOUNTED LIFT TO MAKE OFF WITH JEWELS WORTH MORE THAN $100M

The thieves got away with a total of eight objects, including a sapphire diadem, necklace and single earring from a set linked to 19th-century queens Marie-Amélie and Hortense. They also stole an emerald necklace and earrings tied to Empress Marie-Louise, Napoleon Bonaparte’s second wife, and a reliquary brooch. Empress Eugénie’s diamond diadem and her large corsage-bow brooch — an imperial ensemble of rare craftsmanship — were also part of the loot.

«The theft committed at the Louvre is an attack on a heritage that we cherish, for it is our history,» French President Emmanuel Macron said in an X post on Sunday. «We will recover the works, and the perpetrators will be brought to justice. Everything is being done, everywhere, to achieve this, under the leadership of the Paris prosecutor’s office.»

Advertisement
Forensic police officers arrive at the Louvre

Forensic police officers arrive at the Louvre Museum after reports of a robbery in Paris, France, on Oct. 19, 2025. (Gonzalo Fuentes/Reuters)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The heist has prompted a national reckoning, with some officials comparing the shock to the 2019 burning of Notre Dame cathedral. Beccuau told RTL radio that the team investigating the heist had grown from 60 investigators to 100, underscoring the importance of the case on national and international levels.

Fox News Digital’s Michael Dorgan contributed to this report.

Advertisement



crime,france,emmanuel macron,museums exhibits

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias