Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

US-backed foreign broadcaster selling pricy news gear for pennies on the dollar to ‘spite’ taxpayers

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A nonprofit news organization that is funded entirely by the U.S. government began selling off a large amount of its equipment on a public auction site – with many items being sold for pennies on the dollar.

Advertisement

Radio Free Asia (RFA) receives about $60 million a year from American taxpayers to produce news in Asia. The organization said it was suspending operations due to a lapse in funding during the government shutdown.

But while its website went dark, Fox News discovered that RFA had quietly begun selling off major portions of its expensive broadcast gear, including HD cameras, teleprompters, lenses and even office refrigerators.

Listings on a public auction site, Rasmus Auctions, show RFA-branded broadcast gear is being offered at fire sale prices.

Advertisement

CPB IRKED WITH NPR AFTER OUTLET TRIES TO BLOCK $58 MILLION IN DISPERSEMENTS TO NEW NONPROFIT

A teleprompter was listed for 40 cents at Rasmus Auctions. (Rasmus Auctions)

Some high-definition cameras are for sale for less than a dollar, teleprompters for ninety cents, professional lenses for under a dollar and a refrigerator listed for just twenty cents.

Advertisement

In total, more than a thousand pieces of equipment were offered for sale, which has sparked outrage.

California Congressman Darrell Issa, who had been working to restore RFA’s funding, called the online auction a betrayal to American taxpayers.

WHITE HOUSE MOVE TO CANCEL $4.9B FOREIGN AID WITH ‘POCKET RESCISSION’ BLASTED AS ILLEGAL

Advertisement
Rep. Darrell Issa at the RNC.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., attends the third day of the Republican National Convention at the Fiserv Forum on July 17, 2024 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

«I’ve never seen such belligerence by an organization that gets a hundred percent of its money from the U.S. government,» Issa said. «Lenses you’d pay thousands of dollars for are being sold for pennies. It’s clear they’re liquidating assets out of spite.»

When reached for comment, a spokesperson for Radio Free Asia blamed the Trump administration’s earlier budget cuts.

EXCLUSIVE: HOUSE GOP REPORT ALLEGES $20B GREEN GRANTS ENRICHED BIDEN ALLIES

Advertisement
Screenshot showing cameras for sale for 10 cents.

RFA is selling HD cameras for 10 cents. (Rasmus Auctions)

They also pointed at the shutdown for forcing the organization to make difficult financial choices.

«The Administration’s unlawful termination and disruption of RFA’s timely funding, followed by an extended government shutdown, has forced the company to drastically reduce operational costs to set up for long-term success,» the statement read.

«Shedding equipment we can no longer use, while retaining key personnel and assets, responsibly positions RFA to continue editorial operations that hold the Chinese Communist Party and other authoritarian governments to account,» RFA said.

Advertisement

FEDERAL JUDGE BLOCKS VOICE OF AMERICA MASS TERMINATIONS IN SCATHING RULING AGAINST LAKE

A listing for a refrigerator being sold at 10 cents.

A refrigerator was being auctioned for 10 cents at Rasmus Auctions. (Rasmus Auctions)

«Our plan going forward is to build back once Congress and the Administration resolve our funding issues,» the statement concluded.

However, Kari Lake, Deputy Executive at the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which oversees RFA, quickly disputed those claims.

Advertisement

«Everything they said was not true,» Lake shot back.

CPB IRKED WITH NPR AFTER OUTLET TRIES TO BLOCK $58 MILLION IN DISPERSEMENTS TO NEW NONPROFIT

Acting U.S. Agency for Global Media VEP Kari Lake points at the camera with an American flag behind her.

Kari Lake vowed to get to the bottom of what is going on at RFA.

«We are funding them. We’ve given them every single penny appropriated to them. Eighty cents for an HD camera? That’s a slap in the face to taxpayers,» Lake said.

Advertisement

In a letter to RFA sent Thursday, Lake wrote: «The insanity ends now. Be prepared to open your doors next week for our team of auditors to find out what on earth is going on at RFA, as permitted under the grant agreement and applicable regulations.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

In further comments to Fox News, RFA said it hopes to restart its news operations if Congress restores its funding, and they have enough equipment to continue to operate if Congress decides to fund them moving forward.

Advertisement

taxes,media,donald trump,politics,congress,government shutdown

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Google Gemini declares only GOP senators violate hate speech policy, zero Democrats, author claims

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

EXCLUSIVE: Google’s AI chatbot Gemini flagged several Republicans — but no Democrats — when asked to identify senators who have made statements that violate its hate speech policies, author Wynton Hall told Fox News Digital. It’s just one example of what the author believes is a deeply ingrained bias against conservatives found in artificial intelligence tools. 

Advertisement

Hall used the «deep research» function on Google’s Gemini Pro. Fox News Digital reviewed a screen recording of Hall’s prompt and findings. Google did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

One of the Republicans flagged by Gemini in Hall’s research, Sen. Marsha Blackburn, of Tennessee, was listed for characterizing «transgender identity as a harmful cultural ‘influence’ and has used ‘woke’ as a derogatory slur against protected groups.» Another, Arkansas’ Sen. Tom Cotton, was cited for cosponsoring legislation «to exclude transgender students from sports.»

MUSK, XAI TOUT NEWEST GROK UPDATE AS ONLY ‘NON-WOKE’ PLATFORM: ‘DOESN’T EQUIVOCATE’

Advertisement

Hall argues that artificial intelligence is biased in his new book «Code Red: The Left, The Right, China and the Race to Control AI.» (Wei Leng Tay/Bloomberg/Getty Images)

The finding stood out against a backdrop of inflammatory rhetoric from some Democrats in recent years.

In 2023, Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., warned that then-candidate Donald Trump was «destructive to our democracy» and needed to be «eliminated.» However, he quickly apologized for his comments, claiming that it was a «poor choice of words.» 

Advertisement

Last year, Texas Democratic House candidate Rep. Jolanda Jones made a throat-slashing gesture while rejecting former first lady Michelle Obama’s famous mantra, «when they go low, we go high,» on CNN’s «Outfront.»

«If you hit me in my face, I’m not going to punch you back in your face. I’m going to go across your neck,» Jones said while making a slashing motion across her neck. «We can go back-and-forth, fighting each other’s faces. You’ve got to hit hard enough where they won’t come back,» she added. 

But for Hall, Gemini’s seemingly partisan answer underscored the central argument of his new book, «Code Red: The Left, The Right, China and the Race to Control AI.» In it, he argues that AI systems marketed as neutral are increasingly shaped by the ideological assumptions of the people and institutions who create them, which are far from neutral. 

Advertisement

His book starts out with a clear example. 

Less than 10 weeks before the 2024 election, a series of viral videos appeared to expose a strange double standard in American homes. When users asked Amazon’s Alexa why they should vote for Kamala Harris, the device delivered a polished endorsement. When asked why they should vote for Donald Trump, Alexa declined, citing a policy of neutrality.

«I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party or a specific candidate,» Alexa said.

Advertisement

Hall says the concern extends beyond a single Gemini output.

«AI’s Silicon Valley architects lean left politically, and their lopsided political donations to Democrats underscore their ideological aims,» Hall told Fox News Digital.

To Hall, episodes like this show how AI can shape political perceptions while maintaining the appearance of objectivity. «Through algorithm throttling and shadow bans, Big Tech centralized control over which voices soar and sink across social networks. Now AI has put Big Tech’s consolidating control on steroids,» he writes.

Advertisement

WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?

A view of a computer screen showing Gemini.

Hall alleges Google Gemini flagged Republican senators’ rhetoric as hate speech while identifying no Democratic violations, raising questions about AI bias. (Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

He argues that this imbalance reflects the politics of the people building the systems. The billionaires driving the AI revolution, he says, invest their money and political energy where their values lie. As PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel once put it, «Silicon Valley is a one-party state.»

The money appears to bear that out. According to Hall, 85% of political donations from employees at Apple, Meta, Amazon and Google go to Democrats. 

Advertisement

After Trump’s 2024 victory, major tech companies made the customary $1 million inauguration donations. But Hall argues those gestures did little to hide where Silicon Valley’s loyalties had long been. Aside from Elon Musk, he says, most of Big Tech’s leading figures remained firmly on the left.

Hall points to Democratic fundraising in 2024 as evidence of Silicon Valley’s political influence, citing major support from figures including Bill Gates, Melinda French Gates, Reid Hoffman and Laurene Powell Jobs.

But Hall argues the bigger issue is not campaign money. 

Advertisement

It is the growing influence of AI systems that many people assume are neutral and objective. He warns that users often trust those answers too much, even when they may be biased.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

To Hall, this bias is reinforced by the relationship between tech companies and legacy media. He argues AI systems are trained on enormous amounts of content from outlets such as The New York Times, The Atlantic and Reuters, while conservative outlets are largely excluded.

Advertisement

The result, he says, is a closed loop: AI absorbs the assumptions of legacy media and repackages them as objective truth. Hall argues conservatives must respond by demanding transparency in training data and ending taxpayer-funded contracts for vendors whose systems show political bias.

«Whoever wins the AI fairness battle,» Hall concludes, «will shape the minds and political attitudes of future generations. The time to act is now.»

technology,artificial intelligence,politics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Starmer le responde a Trump por Ormuz: «Gran Bretaña no se verá envuelta en una guerra a gran escala con Irán»

Published

on


En la tercera semana de la guerra entre Estados Unidos e Israel contra Irán, el presidente Donald Trump no consigue aliados listos para participar en su conflicto o ayudarle a abrir el estrecho de Ormuz. Esa línea de agua de 38 millas, que Irán ha minado y cerrado, impide el paso de barcos petroleros y graneros, lo que ha disparado el precio del crudo astronómicamente. Gran Bretaña, su privilegiado exaliado transatlántico, fue el primero en decirle que no.

El primer ministro británico, Sir Keir Starmer, declaró este lunes que «Gran Bretaña no se verá envuelta en una guerra a gran escala con Irán».

Advertisement

El primer ministro afirmó, en una conferencia al mediodía en Downing Street, que deseaba que el conflicto de Oriente Medio terminara «lo antes posible». «Cuanto más se prolongue, más peligrosa se volverá», precisó.

También se comprometió a mantenerse firme ante la presión para participar en la campaña militar estadounidense-israelí contra Teherán, después de que Donald Trump lo criticara por negarse a unirse a los ataques.

Las amenazas de Trump

Advertisement

En declaraciones ayer en el avión que lo traía de Mar-a-Lago a Washington, Trump le advirtió a la OTAN «un muy mal futuro» si los aliados fallaban en ayudar a Estados Unidos en Irán.

Sir Keir declaró: «Si bien tomaremos las medidas necesarias para defendernos a nosotros mismos y a nuestros aliados, no nos veremos involucrados en una guerra a gran escala«.

Advertisement

Hasta el momento, el primer ministro se ha resistido a las exigencias del presidente estadounidense de que envíe buques de guerra para reabrir el estrecho de Ormuz, una ruta marítima crucial que Irán ha bloqueado de facto.

Trump pidió a Gran Bretaña, Francia, Corea del Sur y China ayuda en la apertura del estrecho de Ormuz.

«No lo he decidido»

Advertisement

«No he decidido si enviaré buques de guerra al estrecho de Ormuz», dijo Starmer.

Sir Keir Starmer declaró haber mantenido «conversaciones constructivas con Donald Trump» sobre cómo reabrir la ruta marítima clave, que ha estado bloqueada durante la guerra en Irán.


Advertisement

El primer ministro británico declaró en una rueda de prensa: «Es un tema de debate. Todavía no hemos tomado decisiones. Obviamente, es una pregunta difícil, en lo que respecta a la protección del tráfico marítimo».

«Pero estamos discutiendo esto con Estados Unidos, con nuestros socios del Golfo y con los europeos«, aseguró.

Al preguntársele qué tan buena era la relación entre ambos países en una escala del 1 al 10, Sir Keir respondió: «Es una buena relación. Ayer tuvimos una buena conversación sobre el estrecho, como era de esperar».

Advertisement

«Somos aliados fuertes, lo hemos sido durante décadas. Pero me corresponde actuar en lo que considero que son los mejores intereses de Gran Bretaña, y debo tener eso siempre presente», aclaró Starmer.

Es la primera vez que un pedido de Estados Unidos está siendo cuestionado por sus aliados de la OTAN. Una resultante de la ambigua relación y las exigencias monetarias a su presupuesto que Trump reclama a los 27 miembros.

Alemania: «No es nuestra guerra»

Advertisement

Alemania fue terminante: «Esta no es nuestra guerra, nosotros no la hemos empezado«.

«¿Qué espera Donald Trump que hagan un puñado o dos de fragatas europeas en el estrecho de Ormuz que la poderosa Armada estadounidense no pueda hacer?», dijo este lunes el ministro de Defensa alemán, Boris Pistorius.

Pistorius intentó restar importancia a las advertencias de Trump de que tal postura perjudicaría a la OTAN, afirmando que no se desintegraría por estas diferencias.

Advertisement

El precio del petróleo

Entramos en la tercera semana de la guerra con Irán y el impacto en el costo de vida no es alentador. El precio del petróleo se ha mantenido por encima de los 100 dólares por barril, un hito importante. Antes del estallido de esta guerra, no se alcanzaban esos niveles desde 2022.

Los máximos niveles alcanzados hace casi cuatro años contribuyeron a la escalada inflacionaria que desencadenó la crisis del costo de vida, de la que aún Europa se está recuperando.

Advertisement

Un barril de crudo Brent, el de referencia, cuesta ahora 103 dólares, por debajo de su máximo de 118 dólares durante este conflicto.

Que el petróleo se mantenga por encima de los 100 dólares será un indicador clave de los futuros impactos inflacionarios.

Ayudas para calefacción

Advertisement

El temor es el precio del combustible para las familias más vulnerables. Sir Keir Starmer anunció este lunes que su gobierno proporcionará 53 millones de libras esterlinas en ayudas a quienes utilizan gasoil para calefacción. Esto se produce después de que los precios casi se duplicaran desde el inicio del conflicto en Oriente Medio.

El primer ministro afirmó: «Anuncio hoy ayudas inmediatas para los clientes vulnerables de gasoil para calefacción, destinando 53 millones de libras esterlinas a los hogares más expuestos».

Añadió que también se emprenderán acciones legales contra las compañías petroleras si se comprueba que han infringido la ley.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump warns NATO of ‘very bad’ future if allies don’t help secure Strait of Hormuz

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump sent his clearest warning yet to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) on Sunday: Stand with the U.S. for defense of the Strait of Hormuz or face a «very bad» future.

Advertisement

«It’s only appropriate that people who are the beneficiaries of the strait will help to make sure that nothing bad happens there,» Trump told The Financial Times in an interview Sunday. «If there’s no response, or if it’s a negative response, I think it will be very bad for the future of NATO.»

Trump echoed those remarks in a press gaggle aboard Air Force One on Sunday night, returning to Washington, D.C., from a weekend at Mar-a-Lago, saying it would «be nice to have other countries police that with us, and we’ll help – we’ll work militarily.»

«Remember, like as an example of many cases that NATO countries, we’re always there for NATO,» Trump told reporters, pointing to «helping them with Ukraine» even though «between us, it doesn’t affect us.»

Advertisement

US SIGNALS READINESS TO ESCORT TANKERS THROUGH HORMUZ AS TRAFFIC THINS BUT NO MISSION LAUNCHED

President Donald Trump issued some stern warnings for NATO to come to the world’s defense or face a «very bad» future. (SAUL LOEB / AFP)

«But we’ve helped them,» he added, repeating his comments to the United Nations General Assembly last fall, questioning whether NATO will «always be there for us.»

Advertisement

Trump is looking for NATO allies’ assistance in securing the oil tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz for the rest of the world. Trump administration officials have been repeating throughout the choking of the strait that the U.S. under Trump is a net exporter of oil and gets only a fraction of its oil from the Middle East – unlike the rest of the world, including NATO allies.

«It’d be interesting to see what country wouldn’t help us with a very small endeavor, which is just keeping the Strait open, and that, by comparison is a small [ask],» Trump added to reporters on Air Force One. «It’s small because Iran has very little firepower.»

Marine vessels moving through the Strait of Hormuz in a timelapse video.

A time-lapse video shows marine traffic moving through the Strait of Hormuz. (Kpler/Marine Traffic)

TRUMP SAYS HE MIGHT HAVE ‘FORCED ISRAEL’S HAND’ IN IRAN STRIKE DECISION AS CRITICS QUESTION WAR POWERS

Advertisement

Trump remained optimistic that NATO allies will ultimately get on board. 

«We are talking to other countries about working with us about the policing of the strait, and I think we’re getting a good response,» Trump told reporters on AF1. «If we do, that’s great – and if we don’t, that’s great.»

President Donald Trump in front of sea mines.

The Iranian regime is using sea mines, which it has stockpiled in the thousands, to make traversing the Strait of Hormuz difficult and deadly. (Win McNamee/Getty Images; Eranicle/iStock)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

NATO has long been a point of contention for Trump, who had to repeatedly call on member organizations to reach even the 2% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) spending threshold during his first administration. Current Trump U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matt Whitaker has hailed this second administration in getting NATO to commit 5% of GDP in defense spending.



nato,world,war with iran,donald trump,europe

Continue Reading

Tendencias