Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Vets groups torch Dems for holding up key VA picks, including memorials chief, on Memorial Day

Published

on


FIRST ON FOX: A slew of veterans’ groups, along with Secretary of Veterans Affairs Doug Collins, are criticizing Senate Democrats for delaying key agency nominations over what some have called unserious or «DOGE-type» concerns.

One top nominee currently facing the collective procedural roadblock ahead of Memorial Day is wounded warrior Sam Brown, a former Nevada senatorial candidate and Army captain who was burned over more than one-third of his body when the Humvee he was riding in in Helmand, Afghanistan, hit a roadside IED that incinerated its fuel tank.

Advertisement

He was nominated by President Donald Trump as undersecretary for memorial affairs, which maintains cemeteries and facilitates veterans’ burial ceremonies – about 100,000 per year.

A letter from about two dozen veterans’ groups addressed to Senate VA Committee Chairman Jerry Moran, R-Kan., ranking member Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and caucus leaders was obtained Friday by Fox News Digital.

Doug Collins, left, Sam Brown, right (Getty)

Advertisement

The groups note that they respect the Senate’s advise-and-consent role, but object to the current situation. They note that the VA has the fewest presidentially nominated positions and that other agency nominees receive overnight and weekend considerations at times.

«We will be happy to bring the senators coffee and donuts during such late night and weekend sessions, of course in compliance with the Senate’s gift and ethics rules,» the groups wrote.

Brown and all other nominees since April have been held up by Blumenthal and Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz. – but the lawmakers say their move is not personal and instead aimed to halt mass firings and other Trump-era actions.

Advertisement

Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, indicated that he would join the two Democrats, after a confirmation hearing for Brown, Marine Lt. Col. James Baehr for general counsel and Army veteran Richard Topping for VA CFO, was mooted in April by the procedural hold.

«We’ve had 2,400 firings so far,» King said, according to Stars & Stripes.

Vietnam Veterans of America, in a separate letter obtained by Fox News Digital, demanded Brown, Baehr and Topping be confirmed summarily.

Advertisement

«All three of these veterans received favorable reports following the April 9th nominations process from the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee,» wrote VVA President Jack McManus.

NEW GOP SENATOR TEARS INTO DEMS ‘SEEKING TO DELAY’ PETE HEGSETH DOD CONFIRMATION

Moran grills Wray before Senate subcommittee

Senate VA Chair Jerry Moran of Kansas (Getty)

McManus said that many Vietnam Vets are concerned about the hold-up and agree that Brown and the others are eminently qualified, blaming «two members of the US Senate Veterans Affairs Committee» for «affecting services to our veterans.»

Advertisement

Another letter from the Independence Fund, which provides resources, including trackchairs, to severely wounded veterans, said a fully staffed VA central office is crucial to its mission.

Last week, when Moran again attempted to confirm Brown by unanimous consent – a voice vote that must have no audible objections – Blumenthal rose to block him.

«The chairman and I share a bipartisan commitment to putting our veterans first. . . . I think we also share a respect for Sam Brown [and] his service to our nation as a decorated veteran,» said Blumenthal. 

Advertisement

Blumenthal, whose own service was criticized by Trump with the nickname «Da Nang Dick» after a Vietnamese province, said that Brown’s nomination lacked unanimous support in committee, citing a 10-9 vote.

TRUMP VA PICK DOUG COLLINS ADVANCES TO FULL SENATE VOTE

Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal speaks on Capitol Hill

«This issue is bigger than Sam Brown. It is about information that has been denied to our committee and to us as senators. The secretary of the VA is actively working to undermine our bipartisan oversight efforts.

Advertisement

Blumenthal told Fox News Digital he had a message for Collins: «Before you hire new top VA bureaucrats, you should be rehiring the dedicated veterans you fired.»

«Secretary Doug Collins is denying us essential information that is necessary for our oversight, and we want accountability. All Americans, especially veterans, deserve votes by the full Senate on top nominees—not rubber stamp unanimous consents,» he said, adding Collins can ask the Senate to hold floor-debate on the nominees through regular order.

In comments to Fox News Digital, Collins rejected Blumenthal’s claims and lambasted the delays.

Advertisement

«Imagine how much better off America’s veterans would be if Senators Blumenthal and Gallego cared as much about fixing the department’s broken bureaucracy as they do about preventing wounded combat veterans from coming to work at VA,» he said.

«Despite their obstruction, we will reform the department to make it work better for veterans, families, caregivers and survivors.» 

Gallego said he also does not object to Brown personally, and that he is instead seeking agency accountability – saying in a recent statement he wants to reverse «hack-job firings.»

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Ruben Gallego

Primaries were held on Tuesday night to fill the seat being vacated at the end of this year by Rep. Ruben Gallego. (Getty Images)

In a statement to Fox News Digital, Gallego said Collins is «more concerned with three political appointees than the thousands of veterans who are going to lose their jobs and care.»

«I served this country and received care at the VA. I know how important it is for veterans. Abandoning them, like Secretary Collins wants to do, is reckless and un-American. Show Congress the plan on how care won’t be impacted. Anything short of that is political posturing,» he said.

Advertisement

In Gallego’s Arizona, the Phoenix VA hospital is letting go 800 employees, and a 2024 inspector general report found that the site already faced staffing shortages.

Recent surveys of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans show an elevated concern that VA cuts could impact benefits and health care.

Fox News reached out to King for comment for purposes of this story. 

Advertisement

Senate,Military Families,Veterans,Cabinet

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Guerra contra Irán: Para China, miles de millones de dólares están en riesgo por un conflicto que se extiende

Published

on


Con el aumento de los precios del petróleo y la intensificación del conflicto en Oriente Medio, los riesgos económicos para China aumentan. El precio del petróleo alcanzó el lunes niveles no vistos en cuatro años, una semana después de que Estados Unidos e Israel lanzaran un ataque contra Irán, aliado y socio financiero de China.

Los combates han paralizado prácticamente todo el tráfico a través del Estrecho de Ormuz, una ruta crucial para la energía y los bienes de China. China tiene mucho que perder en un conflicto que se extiende. En Irán, China encontró una fuente barata de petróleo en los últimos años. En toda la región, encontró gobiernos interesados ​​en su experiencia en energías renovables y tecnología.

Advertisement

China se volvió dependiente, como gran parte del resto del mundo, del suministro de petróleo y gas de Oriente Medio. La importancia de la región para China se acentuó aún más el año pasado, a medida que se intensificaba la rivalidad comercial del país con Estados Unidos y el país se veía imposibilitado de vender muchos productos al mercado estadounidense, que en su día era el mayor mercado de China.

Los Emiratos Árabes Unidos se convirtieron en el mercado de más rápido crecimiento para los automóviles chinos. La demanda de acero chino por parte de Arabia Saudita y sus vecinos se duplicó. Las exportaciones de China a Oriente Medio crecieron casi el doble de rápido que sus exportaciones al resto del mundo en 2025. Estos lazos comerciales están ahora en la línea de fuego, mientras los ejércitos estadounidense e israelí atacan a Irán, e Irán contraataca contra puertos, barcos, oleoductos, plantas de desalinización, centros de datos y otras infraestructuras críticas en toda la región.

El tránsito marítimo, no solo de energía, sino también de mercancías transportadas en gigantescos portacontenedores a través del Estrecho de Ormuz está en peligro. China también tiene su crédito en riesgo, tras haber otorgado préstamos para contratos y proyectos en toda la región. La proporción de la cartera global de préstamos y subvenciones de China a la región se duplicó al 10 % en 2023, según AidData, un instituto de investigación de William and Mary en Williamsburg, Virginia.

Advertisement

Las instituciones financieras estatales otorgaron préstamos a refinerías de petróleo y puertos marítimos que financian la producción y el transporte de materias primas. En Qatar, los bancos chinos están ayudando a financiar y construir una importante ampliación de una planta de producción de gas natural licuado. El gigante petrolero estatal chino, Sinopec, tiene participación en el proyecto de expansión North Field East de la planta. Las instalaciones fueron atacadas la semana pasada. Inversores chinos han financiado la ampliación del puerto de Haifa en Israel y del puerto Khalifa en los Emiratos Árabes Unidos, y las terminales resultantes son propiedad de empresas chinas y están operadas por ellas.

En Irán, decenas de empresas chinas han financiado, construido y gestionado infraestructuras, redes eléctricas y plantas petroquímicas. China también es el mayor inversor en desalinización en Oriente Medio, donde el agua potable escasea. Casi todos los proyectos han sido construidos por Power Construction Corporation de China, con proyectos en Arabia Saudita, Emiratos Árabes Unidos, Omán e Irak. «Hay muchísimos países y muchísimos activos repartidos por la región», declaró Brad Parks, director ejecutivo de AidData. «Pudimos observar en el flujo de operaciones un gran entusiasmo por trabajar cada vez más en Oriente Medio».

Importantes empresas tecnológicas chinas como Huawei, Alibaba y Tencent han establecido oficinas en Dubái, donde sus empleados trabajan en un complejo que incluye a Microsoft, Meta y Google. Tres marcas chinas de teléfonos inteligentes —Transsion, Xiaomi y Honor— están ganando cuota de mercado en la región, después del gigante surcoreano Samsung, según Omdia, una firma de investigación tecnológica. No solo las grandes empresas buscan fortuna en Oriente Medio.

Advertisement

En 2018, Haiyang Zhang, una emprendedora china, se mudó a Dubái, la ciudad más grande de los Emiratos y un centro neurálgico para las finanzas y el turismo internacionales. Este año dejó su trabajo en una empresa china para emprender su propio negocio, ayudando a los inversores chinos a expandirse en Dubái. Algunos de sus socios trabajan en el sector de las nuevas energías. Zhang cree que Dubái sigue siendo un lugar seguro para que ciertos inversores chinos inviertan, afirmó, pero le preocupa el impacto de un conflicto prolongado. Durante la última semana, varias empresas chinas con creciente presencia en Oriente Medio instruyeron a sus empleados en la región a teletrabajar.

El 1 de marzo, el gigante tecnológico Baidu anunció la suspensión de sus servicios de robotaxi en los Emiratos. La plataforma china de reparto de comida a domicilio Keeta ha indicado que sus servicios en la región podrían suspenderse o limitarse temporalmente.

El Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de China declaró la semana pasada la muerte de un ciudadano chino y la evacuación de más de 3.000 ciudadanos de Irán. No ha precisado cuántos ciudadanos chinos se encuentran en la región.

Advertisement
Una densa columna de humo se eleva desde una instalación de almacenamiento de petróleo afectada por un ataque estadounidense-israelí en Teherán. Foto AP

El petróleo de Oriente Medio es fundamental para la seguridad energética de China. Importa poco más de la mitad de su crudo marítimo de Oriente Medio, y aproximadamente una cuarta parte proviene de Irán. Al igual que otros países del mundo, China se enfrenta a un aumento de los costes energéticos a medida que suben los precios mundiales.

China es el principal comprador de petróleo iraní, que se encuentra bajo sanciones estadounidenses, aunque las importaciones representaron poco más del 13 % del crudo marítimo que recibió durante 2025, según Kpler, una empresa de datos del sector. China también opera tres importantes oleoductos, dos de los cuales transportan petróleo desde Rusia y Kazajistán.

Aun así, una pérdida del suministro iraní obligaría a China a buscar otras fuentes, lo que resultaría mucho más caro que el petróleo con descuento que compraba a Teherán. A pesar de los profundos lazos financieros de China en Oriente Medio, el país se enfrenta a los mismos riesgos que otros países, incluido Estados Unidos, que invierten fuertemente en la región y dependen de ella. China ha condenado los ataques de Israel y Estados Unidos y ha pedido el cese de los combates.

A medida que el conflicto se ha intensificado, el principal diplomático chino, Wang Yi, ha mantenido conversaciones con sus homólogos de Irán, Omán, Israel, Arabia Saudita y los Emiratos Árabes Unidos. Sin embargo, las amenazas de Irán han provocado la caída del tráfico en el Estrecho de Ormuz. Y no solo se está bloqueando el sector energético.

Advertisement

El gigante naviero chino Cosco suspendió las reservas a través del estrecho, y la compañía danesa Maersk suspendió ciertas rutas críticas en Oriente Medio. La Sra. Zhang, empresaria china en Dubái, afirmó haber observado la evacuación de empresas y ejecutivos estadounidenses de la región, y para ella eso representa una oportunidad. «Su motivación para evacuar», afirmó, «es mucho mayor que la de los chinos».

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Iran’s new supreme leader is ‘his father on steroids,’ experts warn of hardline rule

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

«Think of Mojtaba Khamenei as his father on steroids.»

Advertisement

That is how Kasra Aarabi, director of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps research at the advocacy group United Against Nuclear Iran, described Iran’s new supreme leader in comments to Fox News Digital following reports that the son of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has been selected to lead the Islamic Republic.

«Mojtaba was already operating as a ‘mini supreme leader’ in the Bayt-e Rahbari — his father’s office and the core nucleus of power in the regime,» Aarabi said.

IF KHAMENEI FALLS, WHO TAKES IRAN? STRIKES WILL EXPOSE POWER VACUUM — AND THE IRGC’S GRIP

Advertisement

File photo shows Mojtaba Khamenei, son of Iran’s late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, attending a demonstration to mark Jerusalem day in Tehran.  (Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

«His father had created the Bayt’s extensive apparatus as a hidden power structure to ensure continuity should he be eliminated — and through Mojtaba’s appointment, this is exactly what we will get,» Aarabi said.

President Donald Trump also reacted to Mojtaba Khamenei’s rise. In an interview with the New York Post, Trump said he was «not happy with» the younger Khamenei replacing his father as leader of Iran’s theocratic system but declined to elaborate on how the United States might respond. «Not going to tell you,» Trump said when asked about his plans regarding the new supreme leader. «Not going to tell you. I’m not happy with him.»

Advertisement

An Iranian source with knowledge of the leadership transition told Fox News Digital that earlier speculation Mojtaba might pursue reforms now appears unlikely given the circumstances surrounding his appointment.

«Previously there were whispers suggesting that if Mojtaba were to become the leader, he might introduce reforms that would both open up the domestic political space and bring a more interactive approach to foreign policy,» the source said.

«However, now this possibility seems very weak.»

Advertisement

Mojtaba was chosen «amid disputes, controversies, and pressure from the IRGC,» according to the source, meaning he «owes his appointment to their support and therefore cannot act against their wishes.»

TRUMP SAYS IRAN’S SUCCESSION BENCH WIPED OUT AS ISRAELI STRIKE HITS LEADERSHIP DELIBERATIONS

IRGC

Military members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) in western Tehran, Iran (Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Built inside Iran’s security state

Mojtaba Khamenei, 56, has spent decades building influence inside the power structures surrounding Iran’s supreme leader.

Advertisement

Born in 1969 in Mashhad, he pursued clerical studies in Tehran, Iran, after the 1979 Islamic Revolution that brought his father to prominence. Over time, however, analysts say his influence developed less through traditional clerical authority and more through Iran’s security institutions.

In 2019, the United States sanctioned Mojtaba under Executive Order 13867. The U.S. Treasury Department said he had been «representing the supreme leader in an official capacity despite never being elected or appointed to a government position aside from work in the office of his father.»

Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies’ Iran Program, said Mojtaba’s background reflects a broader shift inside the Islamic Republic.

Advertisement
placards with an image of Iran's new supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei with late Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

People hold placards with an image of Iran’s new supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei with late Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, during a gathering to support Mojtaba Khamenei, amid the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 9, 2026.  (Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) Via Reuters)

«Despite donning a turban, Mojtaba is the product of the regime’s national security deep state,» Ben Taleblu told Fox News Digital. «Expect him to work with and through the IRGC to keep his hold on power.»

Aarabi said Mojtaba has spent years consolidating influence behind the scenes.

«His past tells us he enjoys micromanaging every aspect of authority to satisfy his thirst for power,» Aarabi said, describing how Mojtaba allegedly relocated IRGC command centers to his office during protests, engineered election outcomes and installed loyalists across state institutions.

Advertisement

Since 2019, Aarabi added, Mojtaba has also been implementing what he described as his father’s effort to «purify» the regime by promoting ideological loyalists across the political system.

«Mojtaba is a deeply antisemitic, anti-American, and anti-Western ideologue,» Aarabi said. «He has personally been involved in repression in Iran and terror plots abroad.»

IRAN’S SENIOR CLERICS ‘EXPOSED’ AFTER BUILDING STRIKE IN QOM, SUCCESSION CHOICE LOOMS

Advertisement
Kashmiri Shiite demonstrators march through Magam holding portraits of Iran’s supreme leader during a mourning procession.

Kashmiri Shiite Muslims carry pictures of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as they march in a protest rally on the fourth day of mourning in Magam, Jammu and Kashmir, on March 4, 2026. (Faisal Khan/Anadolu/Getty Images)

Analysts see harder line ahead

Analysts say Mojtaba’s rise may further strengthen the role of Iran’s security institutions.

«The rise of the younger Khamenei expedites trendlines seen in Iranian politics and national security for years,» Ben Taleblu said. «From one Khamenei to another, things in Iran can be expected to go from bad to worse if this regime survives.»

«And like the elder Khamenei, corruption runs in the family,» he added.

Advertisement

Ben Taleblu warned that the regime may also escalate tensions externally as a survival strategy.

«The regime knows it is weak, but believes it can extract a price and widen a crisis in order to survive,» he said.

For opposition groups inside Iran, the leadership transition signals continuity rather than reform.

Advertisement

«He’s the son of Khamenei and they have same ideology and they same strategy and they try to continue the same policy,» said Khalid Azizi, spokesperson for the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Iran.

«So far it’s very difficult to say what he will be done and is he going to have a different policy? I don’t expect this.»

The Iranian source who spoke with Fox News Digital said that while engagement with the United States and the West is theoretically possible in the future, the chances remain slim.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Pro-regime protesters

On March 1, 2026, in Sana’a, Yemen. pro-Iran protesters brandish billboards depicting the Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Hosseini Khamenei, flags of Yemen and Iran, weapons, and chant slogans at a rally held to condemn the U.S.-Israel aerial attacks on Iran and the killing of Khamenei and several military officials. (Mohammed Hamoud/Getty Images)

«As I mentioned,» the source said, «this possibility is very weak.»

«In short,» Aarabi said, «Mojtaba is his father on steroids. He’s certainly no MBS.»

Advertisement



ali khamenei,war with iran,iran,terrorism

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Hegseth once warned against endless wars. Now he’s leading Trump’s strike-first doctrine

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

In a little over a year, the United States has carried out dozens of airstrikes on vessels in the Caribbean tied to alleged narco-trafficking networks, launched sustained operations against Houthi forces in the Red Sea, captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, struck Iranian nuclear facilities and now embarked on an extended military campaign aimed at degrading Tehran’s missile, drone and command infrastructure.

Advertisement

The tempo marks one of the most assertive stretches of American force projection in recent years, spanning Latin America, the Middle East and critical maritime corridors.

For War Secretary Pete Hegseth, it also represents a striking turn. 

HEGSETH BLASTS BRITS, SAYS IRAN’S CHAOTIC RETALIATION HAS DRIVEN ITS OWN ALLIES ‘INTO THE AMERICAN ORBIT’

Advertisement

Just before the 2024 presidential election, he described himself as a «recovering neocon,» expressing regret over his support for Iraq-era interventionism and warning against open-ended wars.

Several analysts say the defining feature of the administration’s approach may be less about ideological evolution and more about alignment and execution.

«Unlike in Trump one, everyone in Trump’s cabinet now — Hegseth, Rubio, etc. — understands that the president is the boss,» said Matthew Kroenig, a defense strategist at the Atlantic Council. «In Trump 1.0 you had some Cabinet officials who thought their job was to save the Republic from Trump, the so-called adults in the room. And so I think it’s pretty clear the president wanted to go in this direction, and I think Hegseth sees himself as supporting the president’s vision.»

Advertisement

‘Validation of … leadership’ 

That cohesion has coincided with a pattern of risk-taking. 

Several of the administration’s most consequential military moves, from Venezuela to the Houthis to the current Iran campaign, carried the potential for escalation.

«Unlike in Trump one, everyone in Trump’s cabinet now — Hegseth, Rubio, etc. — understands that the President is the boss,» said Matthew Kroenig, a defense strategist at the Atlantic Council. (The White House/Handout via Reuters)

Advertisement

Some strategists say the relative absence of early blowback from those interventions may have reinforced the administration’s willingness to escalate into the Iranian theater. 

PENTAGON POLICY CHIEF GRILLED AS DEM CLAIMS TRUMP BROKE PROMISE ABOUT GOING TO WAR WITH IRAN

«I’m not sure I would have advised this,» Kroenig said of the Iran operation. «It is pretty risky, but it’s going well so far.» 

Advertisement

Iranian missile launches have declined in volume. Regional allies have not broken ranks. Whether that constitutes strategic success, however, depends on the metric.

Justin Fulcher, a former Pentagon adviser to Hegseth, argued the early phases of the campaign reflect what he described as a «return to strategic clarity.»

«Deterrence is only credible when our allies actually believe that if President Trump says something, we will back it up,» Fulcher said. «This is a validation of Secretary Hegseth and President Trump’s leadership.»

Advertisement
Pete Hegseth at Department of War

«Deterrence is only credible when our allies actually believe that if President Trump says something, we will back it up,» former Pentagon advisor Justin Fulcher said. «This is a validation of Secretary Hegseth and President Trump’s leadership.» (Kevin Wolf, File/The Associated Press )

TRUMP SAYS IRAN’S SUCCESSION BENCH WIPED OUT AS ISRAELI STRIKE HITS LEADERSHIP DELIBERATIONS

Hegseth, a former Army officer who served in both Iraq and Afghanistan, has argued that the current campaign bears little resemblance to those conflicts.

«This is not Iraq. This is not endless. I was there for both,» Hegseth said at a press conference in early March. «Our generation knows better and so does this president.»

Advertisement

In a separate interview, he added, «This is not a remaking of Iranian society from an American perspective. We tried that. The American people have rejected that.»

Danielle Pletka, a senior fellow at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute think tank, said the campaign has unfolded largely as expected.

«I think things have gone reasonably well,» Pletka said, pointing to degraded air defenses and what she described as repeated miscalculations by Iran. «All they’ve really done is made everybody quite mad, and that was a really bad calculation on their part.»

Advertisement

At the same time, she cautioned against interpreting the administration’s actions as part of a fixed doctrine.

«I don’t think that it is doctrinal,» Pletka said. «I think this is ad hoc.»

Some longtime Trump supporters have said the current conflict is not what they expected from Trump, who campaigned on ending wars and «America First.»

Advertisement

«It feels like the worst betrayal this time because it comes from the very man and the admin who we all believed was different and said no more,» Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., wrote on X.  «Instead, we get a war with Iran on behalf of Israel that will succeed in regime in Iran. Another foreign war for foreign people for foreign regime change. For what?» 

In Pletka’s view, the president has shown a pattern of attempting diplomacy first and shifting to force only when he concludes negotiations are unserious. She argues that posture distinguishes the current moment from past interventions.

She also emphasized that much of the operational credit belongs to the professional military.

Advertisement

«The planning behind this is credit to the U.S. military and to the CENTCOM commander and to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs,» she said.

That distinction complicates efforts to attribute the current posture solely to Hegseth’s personal worldview. While the defense secretary has become a public face of the administration’s deterrence messaging, the execution of high-tempo campaigns rests heavily with career military leadership. 

Some critics argue the administration has yet to clearly articulate an end state for the Iran campaign.

Advertisement

«Pete Hegseth needs to check with his boss on what the objective is,» former national security advisor John Bolton recently said on CNN. «How does Hegseth explain that we’ve already changed the regime, which wasn’t our objective? I think the Pentagon top leadership, civilian top leadership, needs some attitude adjustment. I think the military’s doing fine, but I wonder about the civilian leadership.»

The White House pushed back forcefully on criticism of the campaign. 

Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson, said Monday that Hegseth «is doing an incredible job leading the Department of War,» pointing to what she described as the «ongoing success of Operation Epic Fury» and other missions. 

Advertisement

Kelly said Iranian retaliatory attacks «have declined by 90 percent because the Department of War is destroying Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities,» and added that Hegseth works «in lockstep with President Trump every day» to ensure the U.S. military «continues to be the greatest, most powerful fighting force in the world.»

The Pentagon echoed that assessment. 

«Operation Epic Fury continues to advance with overwhelming success and precision,» Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell said, describing a «resolute, full-spectrum campaign» aimed at the «total dismantlement of Iran’s terrorist network or its unconditional surrender.»

Advertisement

Others see the moment in broader historical terms.

Peter Doran, a foreign policy analyst, described the campaign as a potential attempt to «end a 47-year war» waged by the Islamic Republic against the United States, but on Washington’s terms.

"Unclassified" aerial footage shows a missile launcher being struck by an explosive.

U.S. Central Command released footage showing strikes on Iranian mobile missile launchers. (@CENTCOM via X)

«This is a clear effort to end a 47-year war that Iran has been waging against the United States,» Doran said.

Advertisement

He argued that visible American military performance could reverberate beyond the Middle East, particularly in Beijing.

«They look good,» Doran said of U.S. forces. «That will serve, I hope, as a disincentive for adventurism.»

If the operation ultimately succeeds in significantly degrading Iran’s military infrastructure, Doran argued, it could reshape the Middle East and expand diplomatic opportunities such as broader Arab-Israeli normalization.

Advertisement

«It changes everything in the Middle East,» he said.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Yet even supporters acknowledge that long-term effects remain uncertain. In Venezuela, Maduro’s removal marked a dramatic shift in U.S. policy, but the governing apparatus he built remains largely intact. Degrading missile stockpiles and drone infrastructure in Iran may buy time, but whether it produces durable deterrence or simply postpones reconstitution remains to be seen.

Advertisement

For now, the administration’s willingness to take calculated risks and its ability to avoid immediate escalation have reinforced the perception of restored American assertiveness. Whether that assertiveness translates into lasting strategic gains will likely define Hegseth’s tenure far more than the rhetoric that preceded it.

Hegseth and the Pentagon did not respond to requests for comment. 

war with iran,donald trump,pete hegseth,iran,pentagon

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias