INTERNACIONAL
What happens on ‘bad days’: Troubling revelations about John Fetterman and Joe Biden

John Fetterman has always been an eccentric character on a star-crossed path.
He is the only United States senator who has adopted a hoodie as his official uniform.
He is also the only one who suffered a stroke on the eve of his primary victory, making it difficult for him to speak, but won the general election anyway.
And the Pennsylvania Democrat doesn’t toe the line on all party positions, especially when it comes to his fierce support for Israel.
AS JUDGE IS CHARGED WITH OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE IN MIGRANT CASE, SPINNERS CAST IT AS AN ANTI-TRUMP STORY
Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa. ,talks with reporter after the senate luncheons in the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, March 11, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
But now comes a troubling story in New York Magazine that casts the senator in a much darker light.
The New York Times put it this way: Fetterman’s former chief of staff «was so alarmed with his ex-boss’s erratic behavior last year that he wrote a lengthy letter to his doctor warning that the senator was spiraling out of control and that his mental health issues could cost him his life.»
The staffer, Adam Jentleson, added in writing Fetterman’s Walter Reed doctor: «I’m worried that if John stays on his current trajectory he won’t be with us for much longer.»
Other former staff members told the Times that colleagues were sometimes «frightened» to be in his presence when he was manic, and that his «volatile» behavior has gotten worse since the election.
Fetterman issued a statement saying that «my ACTUAL doctors and my family affirmed that I’m very well.» He called the magazine story a «hit piece» and promoted the idea that its author, Ben Terris, was «best friends» with Jentleson and that they «sourced anonymous, disgruntled staffers with lies or distorted half-truths.»
Terris, for his part, disclosed in the article that Adam Jentleson is a «personal friend.» So it wasn’t a state secret.
Jentleson wrote to the medical director who supervised Fetterman’s hospitalization for mental health problems in 2023: «He does not see his doctors. I am not sure when he last saw a cardiologist, but I don’t think he’s seen one since he was released. He long ago ordered us to stop putting regular drop-bys with Dr. Monahan on his schedule, despite the fact that he had agreed to those as part of the plan.» Brian Monahan is the Capitol and Supreme Court physician.
Fetterman was the first Democratic senator to visit Trump, who carried Pennsylvania and the other swing states, at Mar-a-Lago.
STATE OF WAR: HOW TRUMP IS FIGHTING A 9-FRONT BATTLE
Jentleson wrote another doctor: «We do not know if he is taking his meds, and his behavior frequently suggests he is not.»
Among other things, wrote Jentleson, his ex-boss drives recklessly and recently bought a gun. There are «high highs and low lows; long, rambling, repetitive and self-centered monologues lying in ways that are painfully, awkwardly obvious to everyone in the room.»
Joe Biden, who does his first post-White House interview today, with his wife on «The View,» is a whole other story.
His problem was not depression but making other Democrats depressed when he insisted on running for a second term. We now know how his wife and his staff protected him from the press and even his own staff to avoid revealing his mental decline.
And that blew up on them in the horrible debate with Trump. Ron Klain has gone on the record with his frustration that his longtime boss walked out on one prep session and fell asleep by the pool.

Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 race after a disastrous debate performance against Donald Trump. ( Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Now comes a new revelation in a forthcoming book by Josh Dawsey of the Wall Street Journal, Tyler Pager of the New York Times and Isaac Arnsdorf of the Washington Post.
The Times writes, citing the book, that «his top White House aides debated having him undergo a cognitive test to prove his fitness for a second term» in the early weeks of 2024.
Here was the dilemma, according to «2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America.» And that’s an accurate title.
Biden’s closest aides «worried that the mere fact of his taking one would raise new questions about his mental abilities.»
SENATOR’S WARNING FOR DISTRICT JUDGES AS SUPREME COURT SET TO HEAR LANDMARK CASE
Which is precisely what would have happened. Rather than persuading the former president not to run, they wouldn’t even let him do a soft-focus Super Bowl interview.
During this period in 2022, the Times published an interview with David Axelrod, the former Obama White House official turned CNN commentator. Axelrod said Biden «looks his age»–then 79–and added: «The stark reality is the president would be closer to 90 than 80 at the end of a second term, and that would be a major issue.»
Axelrod angrily called Klain, then the chief of staff, to ask why he was fueling doubts about a Democratic president.
«There’s no Obama out there, Axe,» Klain told him, according to the book. «Who’s going to do it if he doesn’t do it?»

John Fetterman staffer Adam Jentleson said: «I’m worried that if John stays on his current trajectory he won’t be with us for much longer.» (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
This was also around the time that special counsel Robert Hur, declining to prosecute Biden on the classified documents he voluntarily turned over, called the president «a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.» That seems incredibly mild now. Biden held a news conference to declare his memory was fine, but referred to the president of Egypt as the president of Mexico.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Talk about good days and bad days. Everyone has bad days, but it has national and international resonance when it involves a senator or a president.
None of this should be used to stigmatize those with mental health or mental acuity problems. But there are red flags here that deepen our understanding of what’s really happening.
US,Media,Media Buzz,John Fetterman,Joe Biden,Politics,Health
INTERNACIONAL
Israeli intelligence sources reject claims Jeffrey Epstein was Mossad operative following document releases

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A wave of recent reporting and newly released documents detailing the relationship between former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Jeffrey Epstein has reignited claims that Epstein worked for Israel’s Mossad, a theory Israeli intelligence sources and senior political leaders are forcefully rejecting.
Ex-Israeli intelligence officials told Fox News Digital that Epstein never worked for Mossad, describing the allegation as baseless and inconsistent with how the agency operates.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu publicly pushed back on the claims, writing on X: «Jeffrey Epstein’s unusual close relationship with Ehud Barak doesn’t suggest Epstein worked for Israel. It proves the opposite.»
PRINCESS SOFIA OF SWEDEN BREAKS SILENCE ON EPSTEIN ENCOUNTERS AFTER DOJ FILE RELEASE
In the same post, Netanyahu escalated his criticism, writing: «Stuck on his election loss from over two decades ago, Barak has for years obsessively attempted to undermine Israeli democracy by working with the anti-Zionist radical left in failed attempts to overthrow the elected Israeli government.»
Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett also sharply dismissed the accusations, writing: «As a former Israeli Prime Minister, with the Mossad having reported directly to me, I say to you with 100% certainty: The accusation that Jeffrey Epstein somehow worked for Israel or the Mossad ran a blackmail ring is categorically and totally false. Epstein’s conduct, both the criminal and the merely despicable, had nothing whatsoever to do with the Mossad or the State of Israel. Epstein never worked for the Mossad.»
Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak is seen in this handout image from the estate of late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, released by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee on Dec. 12, 2025. (House Oversight Committee Democrats/Handout via Reuters)
Ex-Mossad director Yossi Cohen also rejected the claims in a podcast interview with The Free Press, saying Epstein had «absolutely nothing» to do with the Mossad — «not an agent, not an operative, nothing.»
The strong denials come amid renewed scrutiny of emails, financial records and communications included in U.S. Justice Department materials and other public reporting, none of which indicate that Epstein cooperated with Israeli intelligence.
Barak, who served as prime minister from 1999 to 2001 and later as defense minister in Netanyahu’s government, has become one of Netanyahu’s most vocal political opponents.
PRINCE WILLIAM’S ENVIRONMENTAL CHARITY REPORTED OVER PARTNER’S EPSTEIN TIES

Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak during a press conference on July 25, 2019, in Tel Aviv. (Amir Levy/Getty Images)
In a statement to Fox News Digital, Barak’s office fired back, describing Netanyahu’s remarks as politically motivated and reiterating that he regrets ever meeting Epstein while denying any wrongdoing.
«Barak has repeatedly and publicly stated that he regrets ever meeting Jeffrey Epstein. There is no credible allegation—none—that Barak engaged in any illegal or inappropriate conduct,» the statement said.
Barak’s office also called Netanyahu’s attacks «the desperate acts of a failed and panicked politician» and «a pathetic attempt to divert attention from his catastrophic record,» accusing the prime minister of attempting to shift blame for national failures.
Newly surfaced materials continue to document Barak’s personal and professional interactions with Epstein, including stays at Epstein’s New York apartment and meetings arranged through the financier.
EXCLUSIVE: EPSTEIN EMAILS RELEASED AS DOJ SAYS NO CRIMINAL OR INAPPROPRIATE CONDUCT BY TRUMP

Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in federal custody in 2019. (New York State Sex Offender Registry via AP, File)
Emails cited in document releases describe the apartment as being used by Barak and his then-wife during visits to the United States, with staff coordinating logistics and maintenance requests tied to the property.
Other communications referenced financial ties and introductions facilitated by Epstein, including meetings with prominent business figures, as well as broader correspondence and internal notes referencing allegations, warnings and speculation surrounding Epstein’s activities.
Barak has acknowledged meeting Epstein multiple times and said he regrets the association. In a previous interview, he said he never witnessed improper behavior and never participated in anything illegal.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
«At times during my occasional visits to the United States, I was sometimes a participant in a breakfast or lunch or dinner at his New York townhouse, together with respected American public figures,» Barak said. «At no point in my dealings with him did I ever witness any improper behavior, and I certainly never participated in anything like that.»
jeffrey epstein,israel,benjamin netanyahu,anti semitism
INTERNACIONAL
Transición en Venezuela: Delcy Rodríguez eliminó por decreto programas sociales y entes emblemáticos del entramado chavista

La sucesora del dictador narco Nicolás Maduro, Delcy Rodríguez, eliminó siete organismos del entramado construido por el chavismo durante más de dos décadas, incluyendo programas sociales, fundaciones y un organismo de coordinación de inteligencia y seguridad del Estado.
La decisión quedó establecida en el Decreto N.º 5.248, que ordena la supresión y liquidación de entes adscritos al Ministerio del Poder Popular para el Despacho de la Presidencia y Seguimiento de la Gestión de Gobierno.
Entre las entidades eliminadas destacan:
- Centro Estratégico de Seguridad y Protección de la Patria (Cesppa): fue creado en 2013 y centralizaba la coordinación de información sobre seguridad, defensa, inteligencia, orden interno y relaciones exteriores. Su función era “unificar el flujo informativo sobre los aspectos estratégicos sensibles” del Estado.
- Fundación Propatria 2000: se encargaba de la ejecución de obras de infraestructura, rehabilitación de espacios públicos y proyectos especiales. Es la entidad suprimida con más denuncias de corrupción. Entre 2013 y 2015, el proyecto “Gimnasios Verticales” fue señalado por adjudicar contratos millonarios a empresas sin experiencia y con vínculos irregulares, algunas investigadas por lavado en Colombia y Panamá. Algunas investigaciones revelaron sobreprecios, obras inconclusas y transferencias sospechosas desde el Banco de Venezuela a la fundación. Se estima que parte de los fondos se desviaron a través de contratistas cercanos al régimen.
- Fundación Misión Jóvenes de la Patria “Robert Serra”: impulsaba proyectos de formación, producción y emprendimiento dirigidos a la población juvenil. Su desaparición deja sin soporte institucional a programas de desarrollo de jóvenes gestionados desde el despacho presidencial.

- Oficina Presidencial de Planes y Proyectos Especiales (OPPPE): fue creada en 2011 para coordinar y ejecutar acciones de desarrollo urbanístico, arquitectónico y paisajista. Diversos reportes han denunciado contrataciones directas y sin licitación en proyectos emblemáticos como el mausoleo de Bolívar y otras obras inconclusas o sobrevaloradas. Transparencia Venezuela y otras organizaciones han señalado opacidad en la asignación de contratos y desvío de fondos.
- Fundación José Félix Ribas (Fundaribas): activa desde 1986 en la prevención y tratamiento del consumo de drogas.
- Fundación Movimiento Bolivariano Revolucionario de la Reserva Activa General en Jefe Félix Antonio Velásquez: desde 2016 impulsaba programas de desarrollo socio-productivo en áreas agroalimentarias, farmacéuticas e industriales.
- Misión Socialista Nueva Frontera de Paz: creada en 2015 para la atención de zonas fronterizas y de seguridad.
El decreto ordena el inicio inmediato del proceso de liquidación de estos organismos y la conformación de una junta que supervisará el cierre administrativo, la revisión de bienes y la adecuación institucional.

“Se ordena la supresión y el inicio del proceso de liquidación de los entes adscritos al Ministerio del Poder Popular para el Despacho de la Presidencia y Seguimiento de la Gestión de Gobierno”, indica el texto oficial.
Algunas funciones no desaparecen, sino que serán reasignadas. Por ejemplo, el trabajo de prevención de adicciones de Fundaribas pasará a la Fundación Misión Negra Hipólita. La gestión de la Misión Socialista Nueva Frontera de Paz será responsabilidad de la cancillería. Otros entes, como el Cuerpo Nacional Contra la Corrupción y la Fundación Movimiento por la Paz y la Vida, fueron transferidos al Ministerio de Interior, Justicia y Paz, mientras que la Fundación Radio Miraflores queda bajo el Ministerio de Comunicación e Información.
La lista incluye también el Consejo Nacional para el Desarrollo de las Comunidades Afrodescendientes, ahora bajo el Ministerio de Educación, y el Instituto de Altos Estudios del Pensamiento Hugo Chávez, que pasa al Ministerio de Educación Universitaria.
El documento sostiene que esta reorganización “resulta obligatoria para adecuar la gestión pública a los objetivos actuales”. El proceso entró en vigencia el mismo día de la publicación en la Gaceta Oficial y marca un cambio en la administración de programas sociales, estructuras de seguridad y fundaciones históricas del chavismo.
South America / Central America
INTERNACIONAL
Democrats say Trump redistricting push backfiring as Virginia advances new House maps

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Democratic lawmakers say President Donald Trump’s redistricting gambit is backfiring as Virginia’s Democratic-controlled Senate advanced new congressional maps that could chip away at the House GOP’s majority.
The Virginia Senate voted 21-16 along party lines on Wednesday to pass a set of new congressional maps that would leave just one Republican district in play.
Republicans currently hold five.
To Republicans like Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va., that’s too drastic a swing for a state that only has 11 districts to begin with. Even in light of similar redistricting pushes in Texas, California and other states, Wittman believes Virginia’s case is unique.
DOJ URGES SUPREME COURT TO BLOCK CALIFORNIA MAP, CALLS NEWSOM-BACKED PLAN A RACIAL GERRYMANDER
President Donald Trump speaks to reporters and members of the media at Mar-a-Lago on Feb. 1, 2026, in Palm Beach, Fla. (Al Drago/Getty Images)
«This partisan power grab is not reflective of Virginia. Virginia is a 6-5 congressional delegation: six Democrats, five Republicans. And now they want to go to 10 Democrats, one Republican — 92%,» Wittman said.
«They’re going to disenfranchise most Virginians, if not all of them, that are Republican or independent.»
Despite the size of the change the maps would bring, Democrats believe it’s just the latest continuation of a fight that Trump started.
«You have to fight fire with fire,» Rep. Suhas Subramanyam, D-Va., told Fox News Digital.
«The voters that I’m talking to feel that we can’t just sit back and be victims of redistricting. I don’t think this would be happening unless [Trump] pushed for redistricting in Texas and other red states,» Subramanyam said.
When asked if he thinks the changes would go too far, Subramanyam said he thinks Republicans will have a chance to press their case at the ballot box.
«If Republicans can win over the hearts and minds of Virginians, they will have a good cycle. It’s a very volatile map in that sense, and so I know many have argued that this is actually fair. I would say that it’s certainly a map where, if Republicans campaign well and their message resonates, they can win too,» Subramanyam said.
Since Trump urged lawmakers in Texas to push through a map change in July 2025, state legislatures across the country have explored ways to squeeze out a congressional advantage where control of the House hangs by a two-seat thread.
TEXAS FILES EMERGENCY SUPREME COURT PETITION AFTER TRUMP-BACKED CONGRESSIONAL MAP BLOCKED BY FEDERAL JUDGES

Rep. Suhas Subramanyam, D-Va., speaks during a news conference on Oct. 14, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)
Virginia’s map change, on its own, would give Democrats a path to flipping control of the chamber in November.
But the maps aren’t a sure thing. Their implementation turns on pending legal battles about whether the shakeup complies with the state’s constitutional requirements, according to a complaint filed late last year.
On Friday, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that the redistricting consideration could continue while it deliberates over a final ruling on whether the maps are permissible.
To become official, maps will also require a statewide constitutional referendum. Under current law, Virginia’s constitution outlaws gerrymandering, the practice of drawing congressional districts to purposefully benefit a political party.
Subramanyam said the referendum gives voters a chance to express their will.
«It will come down to the voters. One good thing in Virginia is that people will have a say and can vote on the referendum in April. Folks in Texas, like where my family still lives, didn’t have a choice,» Subramanyam said, noting that Texas’s redistricting push didn’t require a constitutional amendment and was decided purely by the legislature.
Wittman believes the fact Virginia is looking to upend its own constitution should make the reshuffle a foregone conclusion.
When asked whether he sees Virginia’s redistricting question as a consequence of the redistricting in Texas, Wittman said the two situations differ because of existing state law.
JEFFRIES SAYS GOP ‘DONE EFF’D UP IN TEXAS,’ VOWS THEY WON’T WIN FIVE SEATS: ‘THEY CAN’T IGNORE IT’

Sen. Phil King, R-Texas, displays a map during a Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting public testimony hearing on Aug. 7, 2025, in Austin. (Brandon Bell/Getty Images)
«Each state has their own constitution as to how they put together their congressional districts. Virginia’s is very clear. A super majority of voters — 66% of the voters — said we want a bipartisan redistricting commission. That’s Virginia,» Wittman said, referring to the 2020 vote in Virginia that outlawed gerrymandering.
«Texas is doing what Texas and its constitution allow,» he added.
Upon teeing up that referendum, Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger framed the action as a way to give Virginians a voice in a national debate over congressional redistricting.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
«Virginia voters deserve the opportunity to respond to nationwide attacks on our rights, freedoms and elections… I trust Virginia voters to respond,» Spanberger said in a statement.
Voters in the state will consider whether to «temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections» on April 21.
congress,virginia,democratic party,politics
POLITICA2 días agoEl Gobierno busca aprobar la reforma laboral y el Régimen Penal Juvenil antes del 1 de marzo
SOCIEDAD2 días agoAvistaron una ballena azul en Chubut por primera vez en la historia
INTERNACIONAL2 días agoChaotic video shows passengers trading midair blows; plane forced to divert: reports



















