Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Why keeping lawmakers in DC during shutdown may have caused more harm than good

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

«I can’t believe they just left!»

Advertisement

«Why didn’t they just stay until they fixed it?»

«Why didn’t they make them stay?»

I must have fielded forty questions last week from colleagues, friends and acquaintances. Even reporters and editorial staff from other news organizations. And that’s to say nothing of a few Congressional aides.

Advertisement

Everyone had the same question. They were in disbelief that lawmakers just abandoned the Capitol a week ago Thursday and left the Department of Homeland Security without funding on Saturday at 12:00:01 am et.

COAST GUARD CAUGHT AS ‘COLLATERAL DAMAGE’ IN DEMOCRATS’ DHS SHUTDOWN AS CHINA, RUSSIA PRESS US WATERS

Senate Democrats blocked a short-term funding bill, stalling efforts to keep DHS and its agencies operating. (Photo by Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

Advertisement

The Senate tried twice to avert the partial government shutdown on Thursday. The Senate failed to break a filibuster on a placeholder, undetermined funding bill. And then Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., objected to a request by Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., to approve a stopgap, two-week funding bill. Passage of the bill would require agreement of all 100 senators. But all it took was one objection. And Murphy, speaking for many Democrats on both sides of the Capitol, interceded to sidetrack Britt’s effort.

«I’m over it!» shouted an exasperated Britt on the Senate floor, as Congress pitched at least part of the federal government into its third shutdown since October 1.

Democrats are refusing to fund the Department of Homeland Security until there’s a specific agreement to reform U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). And – few Democrats will say this out loud – but their base insists on Democrats shuttering DHS over ICE tactics after the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis.

Advertisement

This is somewhat ironic. Republicans funded ICE through 2029 via last year’s One, Big, Beautiful Bill. So thanks to Democrats, TSA, the Coast Guard and FEMA – all under the DHS aegis – are without money right now. That means tens of thousands of employees are technically working without paychecks as they scan passengers at airports, patrol the seas and respond to natural disasters.

This brings us back to the basic question: Why didn’t they just stay until they figured it out?

As a reporter, I have covered dozens of shutdowns, partial shutdowns, near shutdowns, flirtations with shutdowns. That’s to say nothing of various permutations of interim spending bills – long and short – known as Continuing Resolutions or CRs. Those bills keep the funding flowing at the old spending level – until lawmakers all agree on something new. Sometimes one CR begets another CR. And even another one after that until everything’s resolved. The exercise can go on for months.

Advertisement

HOW ICE WENT FROM POST-9/11 COUNTERTERROR AGENCY TO CENTER OF THE IMMIGRATION FIGHT

Photo of Sen. Katie Britt.

Sen. Katie Britt vented frustration on the Senate floor after her stopgap bill was blocked. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

But as it pertains to DHS, lawmakers weren’t going to solve the issues surrounding ICE right away. So both the House and Senate got out of Dodge last Thursday as the deadline loomed. Lawmakers were everywhere from the Middle East to Munich when the bell tolled midnight Saturday and DHS lumbered into a slow-speed funding crash.

Failure to fund the Department of Homeland Security may seem unreasonable from a policy standpoint – regardless of what you think of ICE. But it’s not unreasonable if you understand the politics and Congressional procedure to fund ICE.

Advertisement

Let’s say they were on the precipice of an agreement to fund DHS. That may involve some last-minute trading of paper between Senate and House leaders. Maybe a call or two from the President to reluctant Republicans. If lawmakers believed a deal was within range, it’s doubtful that leaders would have cut Members loose. They would have stayed if there was a viable path to nail something down last Friday, have the Senate expedite the process and vote on either Saturday or Sunday (albeit after the deadline) and then have the House vote on Monday. That’s all under the premise of a deal being close.

They were nowhere near that stage when lawmakers called it last Thursday. Democrats didn’t send over their offer for days after a brief shutdown of 78 percent of the government more than two weeks ago. Democrats then criticized Republicans and the White House for slowly volleying a counteroffer. Democrats then rejected the GOP plan – only sending back another plan late Monday.

Getting a deal which can pass both the House and Senate – and overcome a Senate filibuster – takes time. And there simply wasn’t a deal to be had yet.

Advertisement

This is where things get really interesting. With no agreement in sight, you simply don’t anchor lawmakers in Washington with nothing to do. There’s nothing to vote on. There are no committee meetings scheduled. All tethering lawmakers to DC does is stir up trouble.

There’s a line in the song «Trouble» in The Music Man by Meredith Willson: «The idle brain is the devil’s playground.» Who knows what kinds of mischief you would have, just making very cranky lawmakers hang around Washington for days – without anything to vote on. Keeping everyone here does not contribute to securing a deal. Yes, all 532 House and Senate Members (there are two House vacancies) must eventually be dialed-in to vote on a bill to fund DHS. But we aren’t there yet. A handful of Members in the House, Senate and people at the White House will be the ones to negotiate an agreement. Rank-and-file Members marooned in Washington with nothing to do but post outrageous things on social media and appear on cable TV is counterproductive.

Now, let’s look at the other scenario of being close to an agreement. House and Senate leaders may believe they are still a little short of votes. But if something is viable, leaders know they can nail down the votes with some arm-twisting, legislative and ego massaging and a few forceful phone calls. Yes, that process may require elbow grease. But in that instance, keeping everyone in Washington for a few extra days and blowing up a long-awaited Congressional recess actually helps the process.

Advertisement

DHS SHUTDOWN LEAVES LOCAL EMERGENCY RESPONDERS ON THEIR OWN AMID EXTREME WEATHER, EXPERT WARNS

Street view of the Homeland Security sign.

TSA officers, Coast Guard members and FEMA staff are working without pay as the DHS funding lapse drags on. (Photo by Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

Why?

Think of the Stockholm Syndrome. You demand that everyone stay in Washington for an extra day or two and the «hostages» will start to come around to the viewpoints of their captors. Yes, everyone is frustrated and mad. But they feel the bill is something they can support and finally end this triumvirate of government shutdowns. In this case, the fustigation builds – but just a little. Everyone is happy to vote yes and rush off of Capitol Hill.

Advertisement

If they were close to nailing down an agreement on DHS funding, then Congressional leaders would have deployed a version of the Stockholm Syndrome to wrap up everything.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

But with no deal, leaders were more afraid of the mayhem they may trigger by keeping everyone in Washington. The devil would romp freely through the playground of idle brains.

Advertisement

So how will you know when there’s a deal?

When everyone’s present and accounted for.

Advertisement

government shutdown,budget senate,democrats senate,homeland security

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Se dice que el príncipe saudita presiona a Trump para que continúe la guerra contra Irán

Published

on


WASHINGTON — El líder de facto de Arabia Saudí, el príncipe heredero Mohammed bin Salman, ha estado presionando al presidente Donald Trump para que continúe la guerra contra Irán, argumentando que la campaña militar estadounidense-israelí presenta una «oportunidad histórica» ​​para rehacer Oriente Medio, según personas informadas por funcionarios estadounidenses sobre las conversaciones.

En una serie de conversaciones mantenidas durante la última semana, el príncipe heredero Mohammed le ha transmitido a Trump que debe presionar para que se derroque al gobierno de línea dura de Irán, según informaron personas familiarizadas con dichas conversaciones.

Advertisement

Según fuentes cercanas a las conversaciones, el príncipe heredero ha argumentado que Irán representa una amenaza a largo plazo para el Golfo Pérsico que solo puede eliminarse derrocando al gobierno.

El primer ministro israelí, Benjamin Netanyahu, también considera a Irán una amenaza a largo plazo, pero los analistas afirman que los funcionarios israelíes probablemente verían como una victoria un Estado iraní fallido, demasiado inmerso en conflictos internos como para amenazar a Israel, mientras que Arabia Saudita considera un Estado fallido en Irán como una grave y directa amenaza a la seguridad.

Sin embargo, altos funcionarios tanto del gobierno saudí como del estadounidense temen que, si el conflicto se prolonga, Irán podría lanzar ataques cada vez más devastadores contra las instalaciones petroleras saudíes y Estados Unidos podría verse atrapado en una guerra interminable.

Advertisement

En público, Trump ha oscilado drásticamente entre sugerir que la guerra podría terminar pronto y dar señales de que se intensificaría.

El lunes, el presidente publicó en redes sociales que su administración e Irán habían mantenido «conversaciones productivas sobre una resolución completa y total de nuestras hostilidades», aunque Irán negó que se estuvieran llevando a cabo negociaciones.

Las consecuencias de la guerra para la economía y la seguridad nacional de Arabia Saudita son enormes.

Advertisement

Los ataques con drones y misiles iraníes, lanzados en respuesta a la ofensiva estadounidense-israelí contra Irán, ya han provocado grandes perturbaciones en el mercado petrolero.

Los funcionarios saudíes rechazaron la idea de que el príncipe heredero Mohammed haya presionado para prolongar la guerra.

“El reino de Arabia Saudita siempre ha apoyado una solución pacífica a este conflicto, incluso antes de que comenzara”, dijo el gobierno saudí en un comunicado, señalando que los funcionarios “mantienen un contacto estrecho con la administración Trump y nuestro compromiso permanece inalterable”.

Advertisement

“Nuestra principal preocupación hoy es defendernos de los ataques diarios contra nuestra población y nuestra infraestructura civil”, añadió el gobierno.

“Irán ha optado por una peligrosa política de confrontación en lugar de soluciones diplomáticas serias.

Esto perjudica a todas las partes involucradas, pero a ninguna más que a Irán mismo”.

Advertisement

En ocasiones, Trump se ha mostrado dispuesto a poner fin a la guerra, pero el príncipe heredero Mohammed ha argumentado que eso sería un error, según fuentes cercanas a las conversaciones, y ha presionado para que se realicen ataques contra la infraestructura energética de Irán con el fin de debilitar al gobierno de Teherán.

Este artículo se basa en entrevistas con personas que mantuvieron conversaciones con funcionarios estadounidenses y que describieron dichas conversaciones bajo condición de anonimato debido a la delicadeza de las negociaciones de Trump con líderes mundiales.

The New York Times entrevistó a personas con diversas opiniones sobre la conveniencia de continuar la guerra y el papel del príncipe heredero Mohammed como asesor de Trump.

Advertisement

La secretaria de prensa de la Casa Blanca, Karoline Leavitt, dijo que la administración «no comenta sobre las conversaciones privadas del presidente».

El príncipe heredero Mohammed, un miembro de la realeza autoritario que ha liderado una represión constante contra la disidencia, goza del respeto de Trump y ha influido en la toma de decisiones del presidente.

Según fuentes consultadas por funcionarios estadounidenses, el príncipe heredero ha defendido que Estados Unidos debería considerar el despliegue de tropas en Irán para apoderarse de la infraestructura energética y derrocar al gobierno.

Advertisement

Opción

En los últimos días, Trump ha considerado con mayor seriedad una operación militar para tomar la isla de Kharg, centro neurálgico de la infraestructura petrolera de Irán.

Dicha operación, ya sea con fuerzas aerotransportadas del Ejército o un asalto anfibio de los Marines, sería sumamente peligrosa.

Advertisement

Sin embargo, según fuentes consultadas por funcionarios estadounidenses, el príncipe heredero Mohammed ha defendido las operaciones terrestres en sus conversaciones con Trump.

La perspectiva saudí sobre la guerra está marcada tanto por factores económicos como políticos.

Desde el inicio del conflicto, los ataques de represalia de Irán han bloqueado en gran medida el estrecho de Ormuz, paralizando la industria energética de la región. La gran mayoría del petróleo procedente de Arabia Saudí, los Emiratos Árabes Unidos y Kuwait debe transitar por este estrecho para llegar a los mercados internacionales.

Advertisement

Si bien Arabia Saudita y los Emiratos Árabes Unidos han construido oleoductos para sortear el estrecho, esas rutas alternativas también han sido objeto de ataques.

Los analistas familiarizados con la postura del gobierno saudí afirman que, si bien el príncipe heredero Mohammed probablemente prefería evitar una guerra, le preocupa que si Trump da marcha atrás ahora,

Arabia Saudí y el resto de Oriente Medio se verán obligados a enfrentarse solos a un Irán envalentonado y furioso.

Advertisement

Según esta perspectiva, una ofensiva a medio terminar expondría a Arabia Saudí a frecuentes ataques iraníes.

Tal escenario también podría otorgarle a Irán el poder de cerrar periódicamente el estrecho de Ormuz.

“Los funcionarios saudíes sin duda quieren que la guerra termine, pero la forma en que termine es importante”, dijo Yasmine Farouk, directora del proyecto del Golfo y la Península Arábiga del International Crisis Group.

Advertisement

Ataque

Un ataque perpetrado en 2019 con el apoyo de Irán contra las instalaciones petroleras saudíes, que paralizó brevemente la mitad de la producción petrolera del reino, llevó al príncipe heredero a reconsiderar su postura antagónica hacia la República Islámica.

Posteriormente, los funcionarios saudíes buscaron una distensión diplomática, restableciendo las relaciones con Irán en 2023, en parte porque se dieron cuenta de que la alianza de su país con Estados Unidos solo ofrecía una protección parcial frente a Irán, según han declarado funcionarios saudíes.

Advertisement

Otros países de la región, incluidos los Emiratos Árabes Unidos, también buscaron estrechar sus relaciones con Irán en los últimos años por razones similares.

Tras la decisión de Trump de ir a la guerra, en contra del consejo de varios gobiernos del Golfo, Irán respondió lanzando miles de misiles y drones contra países de la región, frustrando así sus esfuerzos por incorporar a Irán a su esfera de influencia, según han declarado funcionarios del Golfo.

“La poca confianza que existía antes se ha hecho añicos por completo”, declaró la semana pasada a la prensa el ministro de Asuntos Exteriores de Arabia Saudí, el príncipe Faisal bin Farhan.

Advertisement

Arabia Saudí posee un gran arsenal de misiles interceptores Patriot que utiliza para protegerse de la avalancha de ataques iraníes que han caído sobre sus campos petrolíferos, refinerías y ciudades.

Pero los interceptores escasean a nivel mundial. Los ataques con drones y misiles en Arabia Saudita ya han alcanzado una refinería y la embajada estadounidense, mientras que fragmentos de proyectiles interceptados han matado a dos trabajadores migrantes bangladesíes e herido a más de una docena de residentes extranjeros.

Desde el comienzo de la guerra, Netanyahu ha impulsado operaciones militares que podrían provocar el colapso del gobierno iraní.

Advertisement

Los funcionarios estadounidenses se han centrado en debilitar las capacidades navales y de misiles del país y se han mostrado más escépticos ante la posibilidad de derrocar al gobierno de línea dura de Irán.

Aunque los ataques israelíes han matado a un gran número de líderes, el gobierno de línea dura sigue en el poder.

Según analistas, los funcionarios saudíes llevan tiempo expresando su preocupación por la grave amenaza que supone para Irán un Estado fallido. Temen que, incluso si el gobierno iraní cayera, elementos del ejército —o milicias que pudieran surgir en el vacío de poder— seguirían atacando al reino y probablemente se centrarían en objetivos petroleros.

Advertisement

Algunos analistas de inteligencia del gobierno han comentado a otros funcionarios que creen que el príncipe heredero Mohammed ve la guerra como una oportunidad para aumentar la influencia de Arabia Saudí en todo Oriente Medio, y que cree que Arabia Saudí puede protegerse incluso si la guerra continúa.

En conversaciones con el príncipe heredero, Trump ha expresado su preocupación por el precio del petróleo y el daño que está causando a la economía.

El líder saudí le ha asegurado que se trata solo de una situación temporal, según fuentes consultadas por funcionarios estadounidenses.

Advertisement

Sin embargo, funcionarios estadounidenses y regionales se muestran muy escépticos ante la posibilidad de que los mercados petroleros se recuperen rápidamente de la guerra.

Según los economistas, Arabia Saudita no puede compensar la escasez causada por el conflicto, ya que su oleoducto terrestre solo puede transportar una fracción del petróleo que normalmente transita por el estrecho de Ormuz.

Si bien Arabia Saudí está mejor posicionada que los demás países del Golfo para sobrellevar el cierre del estrecho, podría enfrentar graves consecuencias si la vía marítima no se reabre pronto.

Advertisement

Incluso antes de que comenzara la guerra, el príncipe heredero Mohammed se enfrentaba a serios problemas financieros al acercarse al plazo de 2030 que se había fijado para transformar Arabia Saudí en un centro de negocios global.

Su gobierno prevé déficits presupuestarios durante los próximos años, ya que los ambiciosos megaproyectos y las cuantiosas inversiones en inteligencia artificial están poniendo a prueba los limitados recursos del país.

Una guerra prolongada con Irán pondría todo eso en riesgo.

Advertisement

El éxito del príncipe heredero depende de crear un entorno seguro para inversores y turistas.

Preguntado la semana pasada sobre si el gobierno saudí prefería un fin inmediato de la guerra o un conflicto más prolongado en el que se degradaran las capacidades de Irán, el príncipe Faisal declaró a los periodistas que lo único que preocupaba a los funcionarios era detener los ataques iraníes contra Arabia Saudí y los países vecinos.

“Vamos a utilizar todos los recursos a nuestro alcance —políticos, económicos, diplomáticos y de cualquier otro tipo— para lograr que cesen estos ataques”, dijo el príncipe Faisal.

Advertisement

c.2026 The New York Times Company

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

NATO scrambles jets as Russia fires nearly 400 drones toward Ukraine, signaling new spring offensive

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Russia launched nearly 400 drones and dozens of missiles across Ukraine overnight Monday, triggering NATO to scramble fighter jets in neighboring countries, according to reports.

Advertisement

The massive aerial assault killed at least four people and injured more than two dozen, with strikes hitting multiple regions including Kyiv, Zaporizhzhia and Kharkiv, The Associated Press reported, citing Ukrainian officials.

Poland and Romania both scrambled fighter jets as Russian strikes approached NATO airspace, East2West reported, with Warsaw placing air defenses on the «highest state of readiness,» Poland’s operational command said.

«Due to the activity of long-range Russian air forces conducting strikes on Ukrainian territory, Polish and allied air forces have begun operating in our airspace,» Poland’s operational command said, according to East2West.

Advertisement

RUSSIA LAUNCHES RECORD MISSILE BARRAGE AGAINST UKRAINE ONE DAY BEFORE PEACE TALKS SET TO RESUME IN ABU DHABI

Rescue workers try to put out a fire at a residential building burning after a Russian drone attack in Poltava region, Ukraine, Tuesday, March 24, 2026. (East2west)

Hours earlier, two F-16 fighter jets were scrambled in fellow NATO state Romania as Russian drones attacked Ukraine near the River Danube, the outlet reported. The Danube forms part of the border between Ukraine and Romania.

Advertisement

Ukrainian military leaders said Russian forces have intensified attacks along the roughly 750-mile front line, with hundreds of assaults reported in recent days.

The Institute for the Study of War said the escalation suggests Moscow’s long-anticipated spring-summer offensive is now underway, according to The Associated Press.

RUSSIA KILLS 12 UKRAINIAN MINERS IN DEADLY BUS ATTACK HOURS AFTER PEACE TALKS POSTPONED

Advertisement
A residential high-rise burns after a Russian drone strike in Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, as flames and smoke pour from multiple floors.

A residential high-rise burns after a Russian drone strike in Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, as flames and smoke pour from multiple floors. (AP Photo/Kateryna Klochko)

Ukraine’s air force said Russia launched nearly 400 drones. Ukrainian officials later said most were intercepted or disrupted, although some were able to hit their targets, according to East2West.

Russia also launched 23 cruise missiles and seven ballistic missiles at Ukraine during the night, hitting at least 10 locations across the country, according to the Ukrainian air force.

Ukrainian civilians have endured relentless barrages since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of its neighbor more than four years ago. U.S.-brokered talks between Moscow and Kyiv over the past year have brought no respite, with Russia rejecting Ukraine’s ceasefire offer.

Advertisement

The latest strikes came after Ukraine hit Russia’s largest Baltic port, Primorsk, in a pinpoint attack a day earlier, leaving the key export hub in flames, East2West reported.

Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s ambassador to London, Andrey Kelin, threatened «dire» consequences over what he said was Ukraine’s use of Storm Shadow missiles, which this month hit and damaged a microelectronics plant in Russia’s Bryansk region.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement
Firefighters battle blaze at apartment building hit by Russian drone in Zaporizhzhia

Rescue workers try to put out a fire at a residential building burning after a Russian drone attack in Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, Tuesday, March 24, 2026. (AP Photo/Kateryna Klochko)

«The British, without whose participation the use of Storm Shadow missiles is simply impossible, decided to remind everyone of both Ukraine and themselves,» he said. «However, any action has consequences. And for everyone involved in the tragedy in Bryansk, the consequences will be dire.»

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement



world, russia, ukraine, wars, vladimir putin, geopolitics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Pritzker’s glowing review of lakefront resurfaces after college student killed by illegal alien nearby

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Illinois’ Democratic Governor JB Pritzker recently highlighted the calm of Chicago’s shore with Lake Michigan in a video he posted across his social media platforms — the same area where an illegal alien shot and killed a college student last week.

Advertisement

«Lots of runners coming by,» Pritzker said in a video he posted to Facebook last September.

«Lakefront path, Lakefront Trail — absolutely gorgeous. Just gorgeous. Look at that overpass. A great lakefront.»

The tone of the resurfaced clip clashes with the death of Sheridan Gorman, a 18-year-old Loyola University student who was shot to death near Tobey Prinz Beach Park, an area included in Chicago’s Police District 24.

Advertisement

CHICAGO LAWMAKER RIPPED OVER ‘DISGUSTING’ RESPONSE TO COLLEGE STUDENT KILLED BY ALLEGED ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, center, is flanked by Cook County Chairwoman Toni Preckwinkle, left, and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, right. (Kamil Krzaczynski/Getty Images)

Pritzker’s walk went viral on social media when several viewers online criticized the governor for his characterization of the shoreside area.

Advertisement

«Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker & Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson haven’t posted anything about the murder of Sheridan Gorman, allegedly at the hands of a Venezuelan illegal alien,» Fox News Congressional Correspondent Bill Melugin posted on X. «Last year, Pritzker made a video from the lakefront she was killed at, mocking claims that it wasn’t safe.»

«Governor JB Pritzker posted this video of the Chicago lakeside to brag about how safe it is. Sheridan Gorman was just killed there by a Venezuelan immigrant his state law PROTECTED,» End Wokeness, a popular conservative account, wrote in a X post.

«> crosses the border illegally > released into the country by Biden > arrested for shoplifting > released back onto the street > murders an innocent girl,» former Trump White House staffer Greg Price wrote.

Advertisement

«Pritzker posted this video bragging about how safe Chicago’s lakeside is — right where Sheridan Gorman was just killed by a Venezuelan illegal his state law protected. Unreal,» another account wrote.

MY DAUGHTER WAS KILLED, AND I WARNED SANCTUARY CITY POLICIES WOULD COST LIVES AGAIN

Chicago skyline

There were nine armed robberies in Chicago’s West Side in just over an hour last week, according to police. (AP Photo/Kiichiro Sato)

The area has improved in the categories of thefts, burglary and motor vehicle theft in recent years, according to recent police reports. However, reporting for murder, sexual assaults and aggravated battery have gone up, according to crime stats from March.

Advertisement

District 24 has reported three murder cases, 19 sexual assaults and 32 aggravated battery incidents so far in 2026.

The district has the second-most murders of any district of the six districts included in Chicago’s Area 3, which covers a significant chunk of the city’s northern side.

In Gorman’s case, authorities charged Jose Medina, a Venezuelan national, with her murder.

Advertisement

According to the Department of Homeland Security, Medina had already been apprehended for shoplifting in Chicago but had been released in June 2023.

Even before that, Medina had been apprehended by U.S. Border Patrol in May 2023. He was also allowed to walk free then.

«Sheridan Gorman had her whole life ahead of her before this cold-blooded killer decided to end her life. She was failed by open border policies and sanctuary politicians who RELEASED this illegal alien TWICE before he went on to commit this heinous murder,» Acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis said in a statement.

Advertisement
A state leader honors military service members during a community Veterans Day event.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker signed the Medical Aid in Dying Act on Dec. 12, allowing eligible terminally ill adult patients to obtain life-ending medication after consultation with their doctors. (Jacek Boczarski/Anadolu via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«We are calling on Governor J.B. Pritzker and Chicago’s sanctuary politicians to commit to not releasing this criminal illegal alien from jail back into American neighborhoods.»

The office of Governor Pritzker did not respond to a request for comment on the Chicago shoreside area and its crime rates.

Advertisement

illinois, chicago, immigration

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias