INTERNACIONAL
Trump tries different approach with Russia to bring Americans relief amid ongoing war with Ukraine
President Donald Trump is easing some of the economic pressure on Russia in hopes of bringing Vladimir Putin closer to a peace deal — a gamble that will test whether economic incentives can move Moscow where years of sanctions have not.
The administration’s decision to temporarily ease restrictions on Russian diesel has drawn opposition from Republicans on Capitol Hill and skepticism over whether the move will meaningfully lower prices for Americans.
Meanwhile, Russia has offered few public signs of concessions in return.
Six Republican senators joined Democrats this week in urging Trump to reverse the decision, while five House Republicans signed a separate bipartisan letter Thursday seeking to revoke the Treasury authorization.
The resistance comes as Washington approaches an Oct. 18, 2026, deadline to begin implementing a sweeping new sanctions law Congress overwhelmingly approved to increase economic pressure on Russia.
BIPARTISAN SENATORS DEMAND TRUMP SCRAP RUSSIA DIESEL DEAL, CALL IT ‘BETRAYAL’ OF US ALLIES
The administration argues that allowing Russian diesel back onto global markets could help bring down prices for American consumers while demonstrating the economic benefits Russia could gain through improved relations with the United States.
Trump has defended the agreement as a way to add supply to a global diesel market strained by high prices, stressing that the Russian fuel does not necessarily need to come state side to benefit American consumers.
«That’s a diesel deal that’s going to be released into the world for the world market because the world market suffers with high prices,» Trump told reporters Tuesday.
But energy analysts have questioned whether the volumes involved would meaningfully affect prices. Russia, meanwhile, continued striking Ukrainian energy infrastructure after Trump declared an immediate energy ceasefire Sunday.
John Hardie, deputy director of the Russia Program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, argued the diesel agreement would make more sense as part of a reciprocal deal under which Moscow and Kyiv both stopped attacking energy infrastructure.
«The Ukrainians could stomach it if it were part of a mutual energy truce where both Russia and Ukraine don’t strike each other’s infrastructure,» Hardie told Digital.
Instead, Hardie said, Trump pressed Ukraine to halt its refinery strikes without securing the same restraint from Putin.
«The better solution is to go back to the Kremlin and try to get that two-way solution,» he said.
Trump announced the diesel agreement Oct. 9 after a phone call with Putin, saying Russia would immediately supply more than 300,000 metric tons of diesel to the «American and Global Marketplace,» followed by another 500,000 tons in November, 1 million tons shortly thereafter and eventually another 3 million tons depending on the condition of its refineries.
TRUMP RUSSIA DEAL COULD FUEL PUTIN’S WAR, EX-NATO COMMANDER WARNS AS ZELENSKYY SAYS ‘NYET’
Treasury issued General License 135 the same day, temporarily authorizing transactions involving Russian-origin diesel through April 7, 2027.
The diesel dispute has become part of a broader strain between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Trump has repeatedly pressed Kyiv to halt refinery attacks, while Zelenskyy has criticized the diesel deal and accused Russia of ignoring Trump’s energy ceasefire. Ukraine resumed attacks on Russian oil infrastructure this week after saying Moscow had failed to observe the pause.
Russia, meanwhile, has intensified attacks on Ukraine’s energy system as winter approaches. A major missile and drone attack Wednesday damaged dozens of energy facilities and left hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians without power, according to Ukrainian officials.
The White House says the deal serves two purposes: adding supply to global fuel markets and showing Moscow some of the economic benefits that could come with improved relations.
Trump envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner discussed the agreement with Ukrainian officials as part of an effort to revive peace negotiations, Reuters reported. One person briefed on the talks said the deal could help «soften» Moscow’s position by signaling that Trump remains open to doing business with Russia.
But analysts question how much genuinely new diesel Russia can provide.
«The amount of diesel Russia can provide would be a drop in the bucket compared to global demand,» Masha Kotkin, a fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told S&P Global.
«If you are asking about US diesel prices, I don’t think it’s going to make a difference,» she said.
Sergey Vakulenko, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center and former Russian oil executive, similarly cautioned against treating the roughly $7 billion value of the diesel contemplated under the agreement as new revenue for Moscow, noting that Russia was already exporting substantial quantities despite Western sanctions.
He estimated the sanctions relief could instead benefit Russian exporters by roughly $30 to $40 per ton through better commercial terms and lower shipping costs — tens of millions of dollars per month, only part of which would reach the Russian state through taxes.
At the same time, Ukrainian strikes have sharply constrained Russia’s ability to increase supply. Vakulenko said Russian diesel available for export fell from roughly 3 million tons per month in April to about 325,000 tons in September, leaving both Russia’s additional financial benefit and the deal’s potential impact on global prices more limited than the headline figures suggest.
Hardie said signs of division between Washington and Kyiv could encourage Putin to increase military pressure rather than compromise.
«That message of irresolution and of division between Washington and Kyiv only encourages Putin to intensify military pressure, kind of seeing that opportunity,» Hardie said.
He said the administration had previously presented sanctions relief and renewed economic ties as benefits Russia could unlock through a negotiated settlement. Offering some of those benefits beforehand, he warned, could undermine that incentive.
«It’ll lead Putin to kind of digging his heels in on maximalist demands,» Hardie said.
The debate comes as Congress is moving in the opposite direction.
Trump signed the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act into law Sept. 18, giving the administration new authorities to target Russian officials, financial institutions and entities helping sustain the war. Its first 30-day implementation deadline arrives Oct. 18.
Six Republican senators — Thom Tillis, Susan Collins, Alan Armstrong, Lisa Murkowski, Mitch McConnell and John Cornyn — joined six Democrats Tuesday in calling on Trump to rescind the diesel agreement and implement the new sanctions law.
The senators acknowledged the need to bring down energy costs but argued the Russian diesel would have a «negligible impact» on prices while generating additional revenue for Moscow.
A separate bipartisan group of 22 House lawmakers called on Trump Thursday to revoke the diesel authorization and fully implement the Graham law.
The White House has stood by the agreement, arguing Trump’s priority is lowering costs for Americans while continuing to pursue an end to the war.
Hardie questioned whether economic incentives would carry enough weight to change Putin’s calculations.
«Putin cares much more at this point about Ukraine and his legacy, and this broader kind of cocktail of grievances that led him to this war than he does about, you know, clearly Russia’s GDP or well-being, or else he never would have done this in the first place,» Hardie said.
The diesel agreement now puts Trump’s theory of leverage to an early test: whether giving Putin a glimpse of the economic benefits available through improved relations can draw him toward a settlement, or whether Moscow will see easing pressure before a ceasefire as a reason to hold out for more.
politics, sanctions, vladimir putin, russia, ukraine, economy, foreign policy
INTERNACIONAL
NYC ICE chief fires back at far-left politicians seeking to abolish agency: ‘Change the law’
New York City’s top immigration enforcement official has a blunt message for far-left politicians demanding the abolition of ICE: Change the law instead of demonizing federal agents who put their lives on the line enforcing it.
Kenneth Genalo, who leads ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) in New York City, issued the challenge during an exclusive interview with Digital, taking aim at elected officials who have increasingly called to dismantle the agency.
«If you don’t like the job we’re doing and the priorities and the people that we’re targeting, change the law,» Genalo said. «Congressional people, senators, representatives. Change the law, don’t demonize ICE for doing the job that you empowered us to do.»
The remarks came during a recent Digital ride-along with ICE in Brooklyn, where agents arrested two men, including one facing a pending felony sexual abuse charge, and another who had served seven years in prison for assault, according to ICE.
INSIDE ICE’S HIGH-STAKES RAIDS TARGETING ILLEGAL MIGRANTS IN NYC AS CHIEF RIPS SANCTUARY LAWS
Genalo’s rebuke comes amid a widening campaign to abolish ICE and increasingly heated rhetoric directed at federal immigration agents.
In July, no less than 143 New York elected officials, including 31 of the city’s 51 Council members, signed a letter urging congressional Democrats to dismantle the agency, accusing ICE of widespread abuses and portraying it as a threat to public safety and democracy.
The signatories argued that ICE could no longer be reformed and urged congressional Democrats to defund and dismantle it. They also cited the fatal shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by federal immigration enforcement officers in Minneapolis as evidence of what they described as the agency’s disregard for public safety.
Among the signatories was newly elected New York Democrat Claire Valdez, who has also made abolishing ICE part of her congressional platform. New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., have also separately called for dismantling the agency.
Genalo blamed inflammatory political rhetoric for emboldening anti-ICE protesters and escalating tensions during enforcement operations.
He questioned why activists would interfere with arrests without knowing the criminal histories of those being targeted, pointing to an operation during the Brooklyn ride-along in which protesters disrupted ICE agents attempting to apprehend an Ecuadorian national facing child sexual abuse charges, according to ICE.
«Why would you protest that we’re trying to arrest this individual?» he asked.
MAMDANI CALLS ICE A ‘ROGUE’ AGENCY AFTER NYC SHOOTING, CLAIMS AGENTS VIEW LAW AS ‘MERELY A SUGGESTION’
For Genalo, the increasingly hostile rhetoric overlooks the people behind the badges — officers enforcing laws enacted by Congress while confronting potentially dangerous suspects and protesters.
«We’re mothers, we’re fathers, we are brothers, we have sisters, sons and daughters, and we’re doing our job,» he said.
The Brooklyn-born, 34-year law enforcement veteran argued that politicians were vilifying agents for carrying out their duties, even as restrictions on local cooperation force ICE to pursue suspects on public streets rather than take them into custody in secure jails.
Genalo said such encounters expose officers, suspects and bystanders to dangers that could be avoided through cooperation with local authorities.
During the Brooklyn ride-along, Genalo said both men arrested had previously been in local custody but were released despite ICE detainer requests.
Genalo’s concerns about the breakdown in cooperation drew on his experience responding to one of the darkest days in New York’s history.
The veteran official recalled being deployed to ground zero after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, warning that New York was forgetting lessons about the importance of cooperation between federal and local law enforcement.
«I go back to 9/11, I do it all the time because I was there, I was deployed, SRT, I was down at ground zero,» he recalled.
He cited the 9/11 Commission’s findings about failures in cooperation and intelligence sharing, drawing a parallel to the restrictions ICE faces today.
«We should be standing arm-in-arm with our NYPD brethren, helping the city,» Genalo said, recalling a time when ICE worked more closely with local authorities.
The agency once maintained a dedicated unit at Rikers Island that reviewed the immigration status of foreign-born inmates before their release, Genalo said. Agents took more than 100 people a week into federal custody through the arrangement, which he blamed former Mayor Bill de Blasio for ending.
Genalo said former Mayor Eric Adams later tried to restore cooperation, but faced City Council restrictions.
The political confrontation with ICE has since intensified under Mamdani.
On Nov. 2, Mamdani threatened legal action over ICE’s alleged unauthorized use of city-owned parking lots in a letter addressed directly to Genalo and other federal officials.
Genalo had criticized the mayor’s efforts to discourage private businesses from allowing ICE agents to use their parking facilities during the Digital interview, four days before the letter was issued.
DHS rejected the mayor’s position in a statement to Digital on Saturday.
«Mayor Mamdani should be grateful to our brave law enforcement officers for cleaning up the streets of NYC since he won’t. Luckily, no terminated parking will stop ICE from deporting criminal illegal aliens to make New York safe again,» a DHS spokesperson said. «We need New York to cooperate with our officers and stop RELEASING criminals from their jails into New York’s neighborhoods. Seven of the 10 safest cities in America cooperate with ICE.»
DHS also provided Digital with examples of migrants it identified as public safety threats arrested in New York City, including individuals it said had convictions for sexual assault, weapons offenses and robbery.
The confrontation with ICE has also extended to the state level.
On Nov. 6, Gov. Kathy Hochul and Attorney General Letitia James reminded local governments of a Nov. 25 deadline to terminate agreements allowing their facilities to hold people solely for federal civil immigration detention under the Local Cops, Local Crimes Act.
Genalo criticized the legislation, arguing that it would extend restrictions on ICE cooperation beyond New York City to the rest of the state.
He also challenged city leaders to put cooperation with ICE on the ballot and let New Yorkers decide for themselves — a demand that takes on added significance given the 31 City Council members who signed the abolition letter.
But Genalo said the City Council had refused to put the question before voters.
«The City Council voted no, they didn’t want to do that. I wonder why,» he said.
For Genalo, the growing political opposition reflects what he described as a fundamental misunderstanding of ICE’s mission and the officers carrying it out.
He argued that immigration enforcement has continued under successive administrations, but the rhetoric directed at agents has become increasingly hostile, with politicians and the media vilifying officers rather than acknowledging the work they do.
«They don’t realize the ramifications that their verbiage has,» Genalo said.
«But instead we’re getting demonized by politicians, by congressional people, by mayors, by governors, by the media.»
politics, new york city, new york, zohran mamdani, police and law enforcement, immigration, illegal immigrants
Cuando la desgracia llama a la puerta, nada vuelve a ser igual. De un poco de esto habla la autora de Un dios sacude la casa (Edhasa, 2026) y ofrece una imagen para nombrar esos momentos en los que el mundo conocido ya no brinda garantías.
“Felices aquellos cuya vida no ha probado los males. Pero no hay calamidad que deje de abatirse sobre toda la raza de aquellos a quienes un dios sacude la casa”. La cita viene de Antígona, de Sófocles, y aparece como frase de apertura. Y fue la propia Eugenia Almeida quien explicó que llegó a ella mientras escribía y que encontró ahí una manera de hilvanar los cuentos: los momentos en los que, por distintas razones, la vida se tambalea. Y sí. La m… ocurre. Y no avisa.
En su primer libro de textos breves, la escritora y periodista cordobesa reúne personajes y contextos que, a partir de la sospecha, los secretos y la violencia, construyen un territorio que se anuda por una misma inquietud: el instante en que la vida pierde su aparente estabilidad. Son quince los cuentos y no tienen una continuidad argumental que los obligue a responder a una misma trama. Así, el lazo entre ellos es, sin duda, la mirada sobre lo que se esconde detrás de las conductas habituales y las consecuencias que puede tener un hecho inesperado.
Un hijo que quiere incendiar la casa con sus padres dentro, unos policías que se pasan de la raya, una boda que termina en sangre, una mujer que entierra algo perturbador en el patio de su casa, dos hombres unidos por un pacto silencioso junto al río y un arma familiar alrededor de la cual se instaló la fatalidad. Y hay mucho más. Como sea, si bien son puntos de partida muy diferentes entre sí, en todos aparece la misma pregunta: ¿en qué nos transformamos cuando todo explota? “El viejo vio eso de lejos y pensó en volver a hablar con su hija. ‘A ese chico le está creciendo la noche por dentro’. Acá es así, la historia se enrosca y gira, siempre eso mismo: las gallinas, los caballos, los perros, la inundación, los vientos, la sequía, los fuegos. Siempre igual pero siempre espiral que va más hondo, al menos en el chico, más hondo, más ronco, más ciego. ¿De qué se construye la propia desgracia? Ese abismo hecho a medida. Una roldana de repetición y desasosiego.”
La casa: ¿nuestro lugar seguro?
Lo inquietante no siempre llega desde un lugar desconocido. A veces está en nuestra propia casa, ese lugar que sentimos seguro, nuestro refugio. O también en nuestro entorno cercano: la familia, los amigos, los vecinos. Además, la casa puede ser también el espacio doméstico por excelencia, aquello que construimos para sentirnos seguros. Así las cosas, son las costumbres, los vínculos, las convicciones las que un día pueden derrumbarse así nomás. Un día cualquiera, algo te sacude y en el colapso de una aparente solidez aparecen las fisuras. Y Almeida escribe sobre ese momento sin ofrecer consuelo. Porque, cuando la desgracia entra, viene para quedarse. Es que capaz que llevaba mucho tiempo ahí esperando. Quién sabe.
“Y hay un segundo que une todo con la mirada. El menor de los Zárate que está montando la yegua que ha dejado atada, el tablón de la mesa que cae, el galope de la yegua que se acerca, ella que piensa que gracias a dios el hijo del patrón va a sacar a Luis de ahí, Baravale que da dos pasos mostrando el filo, algo que la levanta en el aire y la boca de Luis que se tuerce hacia abajo cuando el cuchillo de Baravale le entra en el cuerpo. Después el galope, el galope, el galope, ella que grita, que se oye gritar que grita, el menor de los Zárate que la lleva agarrada de la cintura y la sacudida del galope, ella que grita, la estancia y después nada. Oscuridad, noche, silencio.”
La violencia institucional es otro de los temas que atraviesa la antología de Almeida. Los espacios de poder, policía, justicia, gobierno, aparecen como lugares donde las relaciones entre personas y estructuras adquieren una dimensión escalofriante. En una entrevista reciente, Almeida reflexionó sobre cómo ciertas instituciones producen formas particulares de violencia y sobre la metamorfosis que se experimenta cuando se pasa a formar parte de ellas. La propuesta literaria pone la lupa ahí y un poco más allá: sobre los mecanismos de la impunidad, las jerarquías y las pequeñas complicidades que permiten que determinadas situaciones se naturalicen y se perpetúen a través de los años.
“Y ahí nomás me fui corriendo a la oficina y llamé a la policía. Vinieron dos. Lo molieron bien a palos. Sin una palabra, ¿eh? Entraron y pum, pum, pum. Yo hasta pensé en decirles que pararan porque el otro ya estaba tirado en el piso y estos dos seguían palo, palo, palo. Y de golpe, paran. Uno se da cuenta de que al que estaban fajando era el loco que se había escapado de la clínica. Y ya se asustaron porque lo habían dejado arruinado.”
La autora de El colectivo y Desarmadero, demuestra, con esta obra, que el cuento exige una economía narrativa que domina y muy bien. En 116 páginas consigue crear el clima, delinear personajes y abrir interrogantes sin necesidad de resolverlos todos. No subestima al lector ni le entrega interpretaciones prefabricadas. Sobria, inteligente y conmovedora, la prosa de Almeida confía en la potencia de lo sugerido. Sus cuentos no necesitan compartir una trama para dialogar entre sí: los amalgama una sensibilidad particular, una atención especial a las fragilidades humanas y la convicción de que ningún orden está completamente a salvo. Porque pasa que, lo que sacude a una casa no es únicamente la desgracia que llega, sino también eso que sus habitantes habían conseguido mantener en pie.
¿Quién es Eugenia Almeida?
Nació en Córdoba en 1972. Es licenciada en Comunicación por la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Como periodista trabajó en medios gráficos, radiales y televisivos. Por Edhasa, publicó varias novelas. Entre ellas: El colectivo (2007, 2026), que apareció en Argentina, España, Francia, Alemania, Grecia, Italia, Portugal e Islandia y que ganó el Premio Internacional de Novela Dos orillas, organizado por el Salón del Libro de Gijón, La pieza del fondo (2011), La tensión del umbral (2015, 2026), Desarmadero (2022). Un dios sacude la casa (2026) es su primer libro de cuentos. Coordina talleres de lectura y escritura.
Eugenia Almeida,retrato,literatura
INTERNACIONAL
White House doubles down after Trump angers base by floating illegal alien deal with Dems
The White House on Monday morning wouldn’t rule out the administration working with Democrats on a «deal» for illegal immigrants who have been living in the U.S. for more than a decade as Republicans prepare to lose control of Congress in January.
President Donald Trump, in his first sit-down interview since sweeping GOP midterm losses, opened the door to the possibility of considering amnesty.
«The President never said the word amnesty,» a White House official insisted to Digital.
«We want Democrats to show their cards,» the official revealed.
TRUMP ADMITS IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT MAY HAVE BEEN TOO ‘TOUGH’ IN FIRST INTERVIEW SINCE MIDTERMS
They said, «There has never been a President stronger on immigration enforcement than President Trump.»
«Thanks to his efforts more than 3 million illegal aliens have left the U.S. and we have the most secure border in American history. Like the President has said, he’s willing to work with anyone to improve the lives of Americans and Make America Safe Again.»
In a «60 Minutes» interview that aired on Sunday, host Ross Douthat asked Trump how he is open to working with Democrats on immigration as he enters a lame-duck final stretch of his presidency.
«I’d love to do something on immigration,» the president replied. «I think [immigration] both helped and hurt. I think I got an A+ for closing up the border. I get very high marks for getting the bad ones out, but I get hurt because we also took people that had good jobs, that created one violation or breaking of the law — that was that they came into the country illegally.»
Trump, however, maintained that there are people in the United States who want to see all illegal aliens deported.
POLL: MAJORITY SAYS IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT HAS CROSSED THE LINE
But, Trump said, «if they’re good people working in a landscaping company or working in a hotel, or doing something, right? And in some cases paying taxes, and there’s a large group of people that think they should be allowed to stay.»
«When you go into a hotel and you have a woman that’s working there as a maid, as a cleaner as a this as a that, as a waitress, a lot of good things, great jobs, and all of a sudden they’re being taken out of the country, it’s tough. It’s a tough thing,» he said, adding that people who he called «far-right» want deportations regardless of whether the illegal alien is working.
FIRST ON FOX: DEMS’ AFFORDABILITY CRUSADE COLLIDES WITH EYE-POPPING PRICE TAG FOR SOCIALIST IMMIGRATION PLANS
While Trump didn’t say «amnesty,» as the White House noted, he signaled in the interview his willingness to «work a deal» for people who have been in the United States illegally for «10 and 15 years» who haven’t committed other crimes.
Rep. Maria Salazar, R-Fla., a longtime proponent of giving legal status to illegal aliens, celebrated Trump’s comments on X.
«Well done, Mr. President! What you described on 60 Minutes is what the Dignity Act is all about,» she said in the post.
Salazar’s Dignity Act would offer legal status to people who have been in the United States continuously since 2020, provided they haven’t committed other crimes and pay a restitution fee and back taxes.
The White House wouldn’t clarify what such a deal could entail when asked Monday.
Notably, the interview was taped before Stephen Miller, a notorious immigration hawk, was selected to be Trump’s new chief of staff.
Immigration restrictionism has been Trump’s calling card since he first ran for president beginning in 2015. His comments in the interview that aired Sunday drew a sharp reaction from those favor immigration restriction.
TED CRUZ SAYS ‘BLUE TSUNAMI’ TOOK OVER TEXAS AFTER DEMOCRATS SWEPT STATEWIDE RACES
«To be clear, if President Trump struck an amnesty deal with the Democrat-controlled Congress, it would be a bigger betrayal than starting the foolish war in Iran,» commentator Steve Cortes said on X, adding a clip of Trump promising «the largest deportation operation in the history of our country» during a campaign rally in 2024.
«This plan absolutely guarantees that Texas never again votes Republican,» said radio show host Anthony Cumia. «More states will turn permanently blue if illegals are given amnesty. Regan did the same this and California became a forever democrat state. Trump can do the same to Texas. Disgusting.»
«Someone needs to tell Trump: Any amnesty deal with Democrats will destroy the Republican Party,» said X personality Kelly McCarty. «We voted for NO amnesty and mass deportations of ALL illegals. No compromises. No exceptions.»
white house, donald trump, politics, immigration, illegal immigrants, deportation, amnesty
Polémica religiosa con Nmecha: la Federación Alemana tomará cartas en el asunto
NYC ICE chief fires back at far-left politicians seeking to abolish agency: ‘Change the law’
Los comprometedores chats que complican a Mauro Icardi en su causa por lesiones: «¡Ma, llamá a un médico que me muero!»
Misterio por la jugadora influencer que se fue de su club a pocos meses de haber firmado: “Fin de un capítulo”
El Gobierno desmintió que Villarruel no haya sido invitada a la misa de León XIV – Nexofin
Con show de drones y música, 200 mil fieles realizaron una vigilia a la espera de la misa del Papa en Córdoba
Así fue el saludo entre Javier Milei y el papa León XIV en Aeroparque tras la llegada a la Argentina
Artemis IV: los detalles de cómo será la misión de la NASA que busca llevar astronautas a la superficie lunar en 2028
Racing sigue en la busqueda de un nuevo entrenador para el 2027 y hay tres nombres apuntados
El Ministerio de Economía pasó a disponibilidad a más de diez empleados de planta permanente
POLITICA1 día agoAsí fue el saludo entre Javier Milei y el papa León XIV en Aeroparque tras la llegada a la Argentina
- DEPORTE3 días ago
Gimnasia de Mendoza vs Independiente Rivadavia: formaciones, hora y dónde ver por tv
- DEPORTE2 días ago
Franco Colapinto le hizo probar mate a Lewis Hamilton en un evento durante el GP de Brasil: la reacción del piloto de Ferrari
