Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Iran making billions in oil revenues under Biden admin as expert slams sanctions policy for lack of ‘pressure’

Published

on


Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

Advertisement
By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Iran has increased its oil exports during the Biden administration despite severe and heavy sanctions imposed by the U.S. government, according to a new report.

The Energy Information Administration (EIA) issued its annual report on Iranian petroleum and petroleum product exports, finding that Iran made between $53 billion to $54 billion in 2022 and 2023 – significant increases over $37 billion made in 2021 and $16 billion made in 2020. The EIA report is mandated by Congress.

Advertisement

The 2020 revenue marked a low point since 2018, when Iran earned $65 billion in nominal revenue, based on calculations derived from the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) website.

The report’s main takeaway is that China has provided Iran a significant export partner, allowing it to bypass sanctions and continue to rake in profits from its energy exports. 

AMERICA FIRST ENERGY STRATEGY STARTS WITH THIS SAFE, CLEAN AND RELIABLE RESOURCE

Advertisement

The Trump administration maintained a policy of «maximum pressure» against Iran, hitting each of its industries and manufacturing sectors with significant sanctions against companies and individuals alike to drive the country to economic ruin. The BBC in 2019 found that Iran had entered a «deep recession» and that oil exports «plummeted» as a result of Trump’s policies. 

The Biden administration meanwhile sought to appease Iran with a series of sanctions waivers that officials argued would incentivize Tehran to sit down and agree to a renewed nuclear deal, which never materialized. 

Chinese President Xi Jinping meets with Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in Tehran, Iran, on Jan. 23, 2016. (Pool/Supreme Leader Press Office/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images)

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the Biden administration continued to issue waivers such as those issued for Iraq to purchase energy from Iran – waivers started under the Trump administration but maintained by Biden even as Iran’s allies and proxies in the Middle East started to hit Israel. 

«The numbers here don’t lie,» former Trump NSC official Richard Goldberg told Fox News Digital. «I’ve always said the Biden administration has had a strategic communications policy, not a sanctions policy… there’s no active campaign to stop these shipments, to really put the pressure up on both China and other shipment points, and it’s quite obvious from the numbers. 

A Reuters report in 2023 found that «appetite for Iranian crude is growing in China,» which stands as the world’s «biggest oil importer.» The oil’s heavily discounted price due to sanctions might serve as the main attraction for Iran’s product, and the EIA report notes that it cannot account for discounts in its data.

Advertisement

Iran’s 2023 export of 1.5 million barrels per day (bpd) stands as the country’s «highest in more than four years, with more than 80% shipped to China,» Reuters reported, citing consultancies FGE and Vortexa.  

HOUSE GOP TARGETS BIDEN ‘SOCIAL COST’ POLICY FOR RISING ENERGY PRICES

Anti-Israel protesters hold Khamenei's photo in Iran

Iranians demonstrate during an anti-Israel protest in Tehran on Sept. 27, 2024. (AFP via Getty Images)

Some critics have argued that the revenue is not a fully accurate measure since the price of oil fluctuates based on a number of factors, and the last few years have seen a surge in pricing that roughly correlates with the Iranian revenues. 

Advertisement

When Iran made $16 billion in 2020, oil per barrel was priced at $39.68; when Iran made over $50 billion a year, oil per barrel was priced at $94.43 and $82.95. 

Goldberg, a senior advisor at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, acknowledged that fluctuating prices do make it difficult to gauge the true level of exports from Iran, but knowing that the revenues have gone up as the discounts have either remained or increased due to U.S. sanctions would counterbalance any price drop.

Venezuela petroleum sanctions

An oil tanker along the Bushehr coast, Iran, on June 8, 2022. (Sadra Company/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via Reuters)

«That’s very difficult to account for because you just don’t know what the Chinese are actually paying because it’s illicit, there’s risk involved in the cargo, therefore Iran has to charge at a discount,» Goldberg said. 

Advertisement

«When you go to the export numbers, particularly to China – I mean, to go from 300,000 barrels per day to 1.2 million, that is breathtaking,» Goldberg said. «That is not sanctions evasion. That is an active policy of allowing shipments.»

HARRIS CLAIMS AD QUOTING HER 2019 VOW TO BAN FRACKING IS ‘MISCHARACTERZITION’ TO MAKE PEOPLE ‘AFRAID’ OF HER

The EIA noted that access to trusted data remains scarce, and its reporting relied on the NIOC and other third-party sources, but stressed that the EIA uses only sources and data that it has «reasonably high confidence» in their estimates. 

Advertisement
Tehran Khamenei Sanctions

The Abadan oil refinery in southwest Iran, seen from Iraqi side of Shatt al-Arab in Al-Faw south of Basra, Iraq, Sept. 21, 2019. (Reuters/Essam Al-Sudani)

«Because of challenges with data availability and transparency, nearly all the petroleum and petroleum product data presented in this report are estimates rather than actual data,» the report said, later adding, «Data are subject to change as new information becomes available.»

«Although price data are available on a real-time or near-real-time basis, actual pricing data pertaining to sales of Iranian crude oil are opaque, requiring estimation methods and proxy variables to derive estimates of revenues,» the report said. 

The report treats destinations in South East Asia (specifically Malaysia, Singapore and Vietnam) as misdirections for Chinese imports as a means of sidestepping issues with U.S. sanctions. 

Advertisement

On Friday, the State Department along with the Treasury Department issued new sanctions on Iran’s energy sector in response to Iran’s most recent attack on Israel, 

The statement read in part, «This action intensifies financial pressure on Iran, limiting the regime’s ability to earn critical energy revenues to undermine stability in the region and attack U.S. partners and allies. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is identifying the petroleum and petrochemical sectors of the Iranian economy.»

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

According to Reuters, national security adviser Jake Sullivan said in a statement about the sanctions that, «The new designations today also include measures against the ‘Ghost Fleet’ that carries Iran’s illicit oil to buyers around the world.» 

Vice President Kamala Harris’ spokesperson and the State Department did not respond to a Fox News Digital request for comment. 

Reuters contributed to this report.

Advertisement


Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Even if Trump secures Ukraine-Russia peace deal, can Putin be trusted?

Published

on


Ukraine on Tuesday agreed to a preliminary proposal put forward by the Trump administration that called for a 30-day ceasefire contingent on Russia’s acceptance of the terms in a major step toward ending the brutal war.

But even if the Trump administration is able to get Moscow to the negotiating table and end the three-year war under a new treaty, which several security experts say Russian President Vladimir Putin is under no real pressure to do, can the Kremlin chief be trusted?

Advertisement

Russia under Putin has repeatedly violated formal international agreements intended to protect Ukraine’s sovereignty, chiefly from its former Soviet overlord.

From left, U.S. National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan, Saudi National Security Advisor Mosaad bin Mohammed al-Aiban, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha and Ukrainian Head of Presidential Office Andriy Yermak hold a meeting in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, Tuesday, March 11, 2025.  (Saul Loeb/Pool Photo via AP)

UKRAINE ACCEPTS DEAL, SAYS RUBIO: ‘WE’LL TAKE THIS TO THE RUSSIANS’

Advertisement

These agreements include the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, in which Ukraine agreed to relinquish its nuclear arsenal in exchange for assurances over its territorial integrity after its 1991 withdrawal from the Soviet Union, as well as the 1997 Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation, and Partnership by which Moscow and Kyiv agreed to respect one another’s existing borders. Both deals were first violated in 2014 when Putin seized Crimea and backed Russian separatist forces in the Donbas region. 

The 2014-2015 Minsk Agreements, though criticized as «weak,» attempted to end Russia’s aggression in eastern Ukraine, an agreement that was never fully achieved and was again violated by Putin’s 2022 invasion. 

Some world leaders and security officials, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, have cautioned that a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine is unlikely to be achieved in the near term and against Putin’s reliability in adhering to any international agreement without serious security commitments from the West.

Advertisement

«The problem here is that the Russians only understand win-lose outcomes, which means that to prevent them from ever attacking Ukraine again, they must see themselves to be the losers in the war just as they did at the end of the Cold War,» Michael Ryan, former deputy assistant secretary of Defense for European and NATO Policy and former acting assistant secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs, told Fox News Digital.

Bakmut fighting

Ukrainian soldiers fire a cannon near Bakhmut, an eastern city where fierce battles against Russian forces have been taking place in the Donetsk region of Ukraine, May 15, 2023. (AP Photo/Libkos)

Security officials interviewed by Fox News Digital argued that securing Ukraine’s future is not about «trusting» Putin. It’s about actually putting Russia in a position where any future violations would hinder Moscow more than it could be enticed by unchecked opportunity.

TRUMP THREATENS SANCTIONS ON RUSSIA, DEMANDS PEACE AFTER MAJOR HITS IN UKRAINE

Advertisement

«Even if a deal is concluded, Russia will continue clandestine operations across the world to expand its footprint in terms of geopolitical influence,» Rebekah Koffler, a former DIA intelligence officer, told Fox News Digital, noting the former KGB operative can be counted on to «continue election interference campaigns, cyber warfare, espionage and destabilization operations across the globe.

«There’s no such thing as peace in Russia’s strategic military thinking. You are in a constant confrontation.»

Ryan argued a Trump-brokered peace deal needs to reflect on the lessons learned from previously failed agreements, like the post-WWI Treaty of Versailles, which arguably led to the rise of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany.

Advertisement

«How to solve this conundrum? Just as we did after World War II … reconstruction of Ukraine must include economic reconciliation with Russia,» Ryan said. «The Russians saw how we rebuilt the losing side in World War II Germany and Japan. They expected us to do the same for Russia after the Cold War, but we did not.  

«We can’t make that same mistake if we want lasting peace for Ukraine and if we want to split Russia from China,» he added, noting other adversaries are watching how the West handles this geopolitical hurdle.

Bakhmut

Ukrainian soldiers of the Aidar battalion training at an undetermined location in Donetsk oblast, 4 April 2023. (Diego Herrera Carcedo/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

There are numerous obstacles when it comes to the Trump administration’s attempt to negotiate with Putin, including arguments over occupied territory, international recognition of occupied lands, international aid and support for Ukraine, international confiscation of frozen Russian assets, Zelenskyy’s standing at home, the return of prisoners of war and the return of abducted Ukrainian children, according to Peter Rough, senior fellow and director of the Center on Europe and Eurasia at the Hudson Institute.

Advertisement

«Putin has officially annexed four Ukrainian oblasts as well as Crimea. But Moscow has yet to conquer any of the four entirely,» Rough told Fox News Digital while traveling to Ukraine. «I can’t imagine that Ukraine will withdraw from the areas they control, having fought tooth and nail to defend those regions. 

«I also doubt that the West will offer de jure recognition to the areas Moscow controls,» he added. «So, Putin would have to swallow all of that in a peace deal.»

Each issue alone is a massive undertaking to negotiate, and while Ukraine this week may be outlining concessions it could make to secure a deal coordinated by the U.S., Putin is unlikely to do the same, according to Koffler, who briefed NATO years ahead of the 2022 invasion on Putin’s plans.

Advertisement

RUBIO SAYS MINERAL DEAL ‘NOT MAIN TOPIC ON AGENDA’ IN UKRAINE MEETING

«Putin is unlikely to make any concessions as he believes he is in a strong position,» Koffler told Fox News Digital. «The disparity in combat potential dramatically favors Russia over Ukraine, which is out-manned and outgunned because Putin transitioned the Russian military and economy on a wartime footing seven years prior to the invasion of Ukraine.»

vladimir putin

Russian President Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting on the draft of a 2024 federal budget and the planning period of 2025 and 2026, via video link at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Sept. 18, 2023 (Sputnik/Mikhail Metzel/Pool)

«Putin believes he has prepared Russia to fight till the last Ukrainian and till the last missile in NATO’s arsenal,» she added, echoing a January warning issued by NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who said Russia’s defense industry output over a three-month period equates to what all of NATO produces an entire year.

Advertisement

«Putin is highly unlikely to agree to a ceasefire because he doesn’t want to give a strategic pause to Ukraine, the U.S., and NATO to re-arm,» Koffler said. «He doesn’t trust Washington. He doesn’t trust President Trump any more than we trust Putin. 

«He trusts Trump even less than Biden because he could read Biden and predict his behavior. He cannot read Trump because Trump is unpredictable.»

The experts argued there are too many variables that could play out during negotiations that will determine whether Putin can be adequately held accountable or «trusted» regarding future agreements.

Advertisement
Ukraine war

Ukrainian soldiers work with «pion» artillery in the northern direction of the Donbass front line as the Russia-Ukraine war continues in Donetsk, Ukraine, Jan. 7, 2023.  (Diego Herrera Carcedo/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Ultimately, Koffler said, Putin will not leave eastern Ukraine.

«Ukraine has always been a red line for Putin, in terms of who has geopolitical control of it, Russia or the West. And he will continue to enforce this red line,» she said. «The only way to ensure that Putin doesn’t invade another country is to make NATO strong again, beef up force posture, increase defense spending, secure its command-and-control networks and develop actual deterrence and counter-strategy that addresses every prong of Putin’s strategy.» 

Advertisement


Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Para cumplir con el recorte de Donald Trump, la NASA echó a su científica jefe y anticipó más despidos

Published

on


La NASA anunció este martes el despido de su científica jefe y de otros 22 funcionarios para cumplir con la orden del presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump. La medida se tomó en paralelo con los masivos recortes que lleva adelante el Gobierno de ese país en el Departamento de Educación, donde se espera que la mitad del personal sea cesanteado próximamente.

La agencia espacial estadounidense informó que implementó más recortes y eliminó la Oficina del Científico Jefe, dirigida por Katherine Calvin, la reconocida climatóloga que fue echada y que anteriormente contribuyó en los informes clave de la ONU sobre el cambio climático.

Advertisement

«Para optimizar nuestra fuerza laboral, y en cumplimiento de una orden ejecutiva, la NASA está iniciando su proceso de reducción gradual de personal», dijo la portavoz de la agencia, Cheryl Warner, y añadió que algunos empleados elegibles podrán optar al programa de jubilación anticipada voluntaria.

En la misma línea, la NASA también suprimió la Oficina de Tecnología, Política y Estrategia y la división de Diversidad, Equidad, Inclusión y Accesibilidad.

Las drásticas medidas ocurren mientras circulan las versiones de que la Casa Blanca está planeando reducir a la mitad el presupuesto científico de la agencia espacial estadounidense.

Advertisement

Hasta ahora, la NASA había logrado evitar recortes que llegaron a distintas áreas. En febrero, la entidad iba a despedir a mil empleados en período de prueba, pero Jared Isaacman, candidato de Trump para dirigir la NASA, solicitó la suspensión de los recortes, según Ars Technica.

Isaacman, multimillonario del sector de los pagos electrónicos, es además cliente cercano de SpaceX, la empresa aeroespacial de Elon Musk, a cargo del Departamento de Eficiencia Gubernamental y quien, en definitiva, asesora a Trump en el recorte de gastos.

Lo paradójico es que en su discurso de la semana pasada, Trump prometió que Estados Unidos «plantaría la bandera estadounidense en Marte e incluso más allá».

Advertisement

La NASA cumple un papel crucial en la investigación climática, dado que opera una flota de satélites de monitoreo terrestre y desarrolla sofisticados modelos climáticos con código abierto para investigadores y el público.

Trump calificó el cambio climático de «estafa» y no ocultó su desprecio por la ONU y la ciencia climática, al punto de retirar a Estados Unidos del Acuerdo de París por segunda vez.

Su administración también despidió a cientos de empleados de la Administración Nacional Oceánica y Atmosférica (NOAA), otra agencia climática clave del país.

Advertisement

Quién es Katherine Calvin, la referente de la NASA que fue despedida

La investigadora Katherine Calvin, de 40 años, fue designada en 2022 por el expresidente Joe Biden con el fin de asesorar a los líderes de la NASA en asuntos científicos y en la toma de decisiones sobre inversiones en investigación. Además, ocupó el cargo de asesora principal de la agencia en temas climáticos.

Katherine Calvin, la científica que fue despedida de la NASA.

Calvin también fue copresidenta del Grupo 3 del Panel Intergubernamental sobre Cambio Climático (IPCC), destinado a trabajar en la reducción de las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero.

Advertisement

A fines de febrero, la administración republicana le impidió participar en la última sesión plenaria del IPCC en China y la NASA desmanteló el equipo técnico que la acompañaba en su trabajo con el Grupo 3.

Según su perfil que todavía sigue disponible en la página de la NASA, Calvin previamente también fue parte Instituto Conjunto de Investigación sobre el Cambio Global (JGCRI) del Laboratorio Nacional del Pacífico Noroeste en College Park, Maryland. Allí, contribuyó al Modelo de Análisis del Cambio Global del JGCRI, una herramienta utilizada para explorar y analizar las interacciones entre los sistemas humanos y terrestres en el marco del cambio climático global.

También trabajó en el Modelo del Sistema Terrestre de Energía a Exaescala del Departamento de Energía, un sistema que permitía analizar el estado pasado, presente y futuro del sistema terrestre.

Advertisement

Los próximos recortes que se esperan en Estados Unidos bajo el mandato de Trump

En paralelo con el anuncio de la NASA, el Departamento de Educación estadounidense anunció este martes que despedirá a casi la mitad de su personal, como parte de la política de recorte masivo de funcionarios federales.

«Hoy, el departamento comenzó un programa de reducción de personal que afecta a casi el 50% de su personal», se informó a través de un comunicado, en el que se detalló que se implementará a partir del 21 de marzo.

Advertisement
El presidente Donald Trump ordenó recortes en el  Departamento de Educación de Estados Unidos. Foto ReutersEl presidente Donald Trump ordenó recortes en el Departamento de Educación de Estados Unidos. Foto Reuters

Estos despidos «reflejan el compromiso del departamento de Educación con la eficiencia, la rendición de cuentas y la garantía de que los recursos se despliegan donde más importan: con los estudiantes, los padres y los profesores», indicó la secretaria Linda McMahon en el descargo.

Más tarde, McMahon declaró a Fox News que la decisión de recortar su personal, apenas cinco días después de empezar a trabajar, era un paso para cumplir la orden que el presidente Donald Trump le dio el mes pasado.

«Su directiva para mí, claramente, es cerrar el Departamento de Educación, y sabemos que tendremos que trabajar con el Congreso para conseguirlo», dijo la secretaria, exdirectora ejecutiva de World Wrestling Entertainment.

«Pero lo que hicimos hoy fue dar el primer paso para eliminar lo que creo que es una hinchazón burocrática», remató.

Advertisement

Durante su campaña presidencial, Trump prometió que iba a deshacerse del Departamento de Educación y que pretendía delegar sus responsabilidades a los estados estadounidenses, que ya tienen la mayoría de las competencias en este ámbito.

Creado en 1979 bajo la presidencia del demócrata Jimmy Carter, el Departamento de Educación no puede desmantelarse completamente sin la aprobación de un proyecto de ley que requiere 60 votos en el Senado, donde los republicanos ocupan actualmente 53 escaños.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

La salud del papa Francisco: «El Pontífice se encuentra estable con ligeras mejoras en una situación compleja»

Published

on


La oficina de prensa vaticana comunicó que el «Pontífice se encuentra estable con ligeras mejoras en una situación compleja». Continuó la terapia con medicamentos. En cuanto a la ventilación, hoy recibió administración de oxígeno con nasales de alto flujo”

El Papa enfermo despertó este martes reconfortado por las buenas noticias que le trasmitió en la noche del lunes el equipo de médicos que lo curan y que anunciaron la decisión de disolver el pronóstico reservado tras una semana de mejorías dentro de su grave estado. Pero indicaron que todavía debe someterse a los tratamientos durante varios días antes de hacer otros anuncios. La disolución de la reserva significa que el pontífice argentino “no está en peligro de muerte”.

Advertisement

El cuadro resta complejo y se temen otros peligros, pero las señales positivas de recuperación se han consolidado, “y confirman los exámenes de sangre, de la objetividad clínica y de la buena respuesta a la terapia farmacológica”.

La pulmonía bilateral por la que fue internado el 14 de febrero en el hospital Gemelli esta en vía de regresión “aunque restan las incógnitas relativas a la bronquitis crónica de la que no sanará”.

Los médicos señalan que el haber disuelto la prognosis reservada está ligada a la actual “estabilidad del cuadro”. La situación puede volver y pueden presentarse otros peligros.

Advertisement

El Papa seguiría semanas en el Hospital

Una fuente indicó que el Papa deberá continuar en su apartamento del décimo piso del hospital “para otras semanas de cura”.

Monjas rezan en las puertas del hospital, en Roma. Foto: EFE

“Es necesario continuar por ulteriores días la terapia médica en ambiente hospitalario”, agregó la fuente.

Advertisement

Los médicos no se pronuncian acerca de si el regreso al Vaticano será a tiempo para que el pontífice pueda celebrar la fiesta de Pascua, el 20 de abril,

Francesco continúa con la fisioterapia motora para tener entrenados los músculos y la fisioterapia respiratoria a traves de técnicas de postura, “útiles para gestionar la llamada crisis de hambre de aire”.

El Papa, como hizo el lunes, volverá este martes a seguir por una conexión especial, el encuentro anual de la Curia Romana en el aula Pablo VI del Vaticano, de los ejercicios espirituales. Francisco puede ver a todos pero no pueden verlo a él.

Advertisement

La opinión de un experto sobre el cuadro del papa Francisco

El anestesista y reanimador, profesor Stefano Romagnoli, cree que para la recuperación de la salud del Papa “son necesarios aún tiempos largos”. Y señala que ahora “el verdadero paso hacia adelante vendrá cuando no sea más ventilado de noche”.

Desde el lunes 3, cuando sufrió dos serios episodios de crisis respiratorias, Francisco respira, todas las noches y toda la noche, con una máscara mecánica boca-nariz. De día lo cambian a cánulas nasales amplio flujo. “El verdadero paso adelante vendrá cuando no será necesario ventilarlo de noche”, explica.

Advertisement
mascarilla-papa

Romagnoli cree que “la estabilidad está probablemente garantizada por la asistencia continuada que recibe”. El transcurrir de los días de internación deberían llevar a “un progresivo mejoramiento importante”.

“Es necesario esperar para comprender que sucederá”, afirma el experto.

“El cuadro respiratorio mejora. Los exámenes dicen que los glóbulos blancos no se han incrementado. Pero en un anciano frágil los glóbulos blancos estables o bajos y la ausencia de fiebre podrían no indicar ausencia de infección o mejoramiento”.

El anestesista y reanimador cree que “las oscilaciones son típicas del paciente en condiciones críticas. Hay momentos en los que prevalece una mayor fatiga o hay empeoramientos momentáneos del estado cognitivo y nuevas infecciones, nuevas insuficiencias respiratorias. Lo importante es que estas oscilaciones vayan hacia un mejoramiento global”.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias

Copyright © 2025 NDM - Noticias del Momento | #Noticias #Chimentos #Política #Fútbol #Economía #Sociedad