Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

‘Maryland man’ Kilmar Abrego Garcia exposed in police records as ‘violent’ repeat wife beater

Published

on


A now-deported illegal alien accused of being an MS-13 gang member that was living illegally in Maryland has a record of being a «violent» repeat wife beater, according to court records filed in a Prince George’s County, Maryland, district court by his wife.

Fox News obtained the written domestic violence allegations filed in court against 29-year-old Kilmar Abrego Garcia by his wife, Jennifer Vasquez, in 2021.

Advertisement

In the filing, written in Vasquez’s own handwriting, she alleges Abrego Garcia repeatedly beat her, writing: «At this point, I am afraid to be close to him. I have multiple photos/videos of how violent he can be and all the bruises he [has] left me.»

Vasquez alleged that Abrego Garcia punched and scratched her on her eye, leaving her bleeding. He also allegedly threw her laptop on the floor.

WE DON’T WANT KILMAR ABREGO GARCIA BACK, SAYS AG PAM BONDI 

Advertisement

As Democrats and media outlets clamor for the return of Salvadoran migrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was deported to a maximum-security prison in his home country, publicly available domestic violence court records cast doubt on the media narrative about his innocence. (Alex Peña/Getty Images; Fox News)

She wrote that on another day, Abrego Garcia got angry again, started yelling, and ripped her shirt and shorts off before grabbing her arm and leaving marks.

Vasquez recalled two times in 2020 that Abrego Garcia hit her.

Advertisement

«In November 2020, he hit me with his work boot,» she wrote. «In August 2020, he hit me in the eye leaving a purple eye.»

Additionally, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released court documents regarding Abrego Garcia, which cast further doubt on the Democrats’ narrative about his innocence.

DHS released new documents this week, which it says definitively proves Abrego Garcia, who was deported to the El Salvadoran mega prison «Terrorism Confinement Center» (CECOT) last month, is a member of the notorious MS-13 gang.

Advertisement

According to a Prince George’s County Police Department interview sheet shared with Fox News by DHS, local police discovered Abrego Garcia during a murder investigation. Police found him loitering in a Home Depot parking lot with other known MS-13 gang members in possession of illicit drugs in 2019.

LIBERAL SENATOR SAYS HE IS FLYING TO VISIT DEPORTED MIGRANT IN PRISON, OTHER DEMS PLANNING TRIPS

Kilmar Abrego Garcia

Justice Department attorneys on Friday said they are unaware of Maryland immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s whereabouts after he was deported to a Salvadoran prison last month. (Fox News)

The police department’s Gang Unit MS-13 Intelligence Squad conducted an interview with Abrego Garcia and contacted a «past proven and reliable source» who identified him as an active member of MS-13 with the «Westerns» clique, with the rank of «Chequeo» and the moniker of «Chele.»

Advertisement

The news comes as Democrats clamor for the return of Abrego Garcia, who they say was «wrongly deported» to a maximum-security prison in his home country as part of the Trump administration’s efforts to crack down on illegal migrant crime. 

Last week, the Supreme Court upheld a lower court’s decision ordering the Trump administration to arrange Abrego Garcia’s return. The court required the «government to ‘facilitate’ Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador.» 

The Trump administration agreed to clear any administrative obstacles keeping Abrego Garcia from returning to the U.S., but Attorney General Pam Bondi has said that returning him is «up to El Salvador. If they want to return him. That’s not up to us.» 

Advertisement

KRISTI NOEM CRITICIZES ‘LIBERAL LEFT’ FOR TURNING ACCUSED GANG MEMBER INTO ‘MEDIA DARLING’

Garcia being handled by guards in El Salvador

In this undated photo provided by the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, a man identified by Jennifer Vasquez Sura as her husband, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, is led by force by guards through the Terrorism Confinement Center in Tecoluca, El Salvador. (U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland via AP)

This has caused outrage among Democrats, many of whom have begun referring to him as a «Maryland man» who was wrongly deported. Some have even suggested he was kidnapped by the Trump administration.

«Kilmar Abrego Garcia was wrongly deported to El Salvador as part of the Trump Administration’s government-funded kidnapping rampage,» Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., posted on X. «He is rotting away in a foreign prison where his life is in danger. We need to go there now to make sure he’s okay.»

Advertisement

On Wednesday, Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., flew to El Salvador to visit Abrego Garcia in prison and work to secure his release. His trip has been criticized by many, including the mother of Rachel Morrin, a 39-year-old Maryland mother who was raped and murdered by a Salvadoran illegal immigrant in 2023. 

«To have a senator from Maryland who didn’t even acknowledge, or barely acknowledge, my daughter and the brutal death that she endured, leaving her five children without a mother and now a grandbaby without a grandmother so that he can use my taxpayer money to fly to El Salvador to bring back someone that’s not even an American citizen. Why does that person have more rights than I do, or my daughter, or my grandchildren? I don’t understand this,» she said. 

BONDI DEFIANT, SAYS ABREGO GARCIA WILL STAY IN EL SALVADOR ‘END OF THE STORY’

Advertisement
Prince George's County Police Department car

According to a Prince George’s County, Maryland, Police Department interview sheet shared with Fox News by DHS, police discovered Abrego Garcia during a murder investigation. Police found him loitering in a Home Depot parking lot with other known MS-13 gang members in possession of illicit drugs in 2019.  (Prince George’s County Police Department)

On Wednesday, the Department of Homeland Security doubled down, saying Abrego Garcia has a «history of violence and was not the upstanding ‘Maryland Man’ the media has portrayed him as.»

DHS shared court filings in which Abrego Garcia’s wife, Jennifer Vasquez, sought a domestic violence restraining order against him, claiming he «punched, scratched, and ripped off her shirt.»

And a 2019 DHS interview document shared with Fox News shows Abrego Garcia admitted to being in the U.S. illegally and claimed to have «walked across the desert for many days entering illegally into the United States near McAllen, Texas on or about March 25, 2012.» 

Advertisement

As a result, Abrego Garcia was marked as eligible for deportation in 2019. 

CLICK HERE FOR MORE IMMIGRATION COVERAGE

Through it all, the Trump administration continues to maintain it was right to deport Abrego Garcia to CECOT.

Advertisement
kristi noem cecot

Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem tours the Terrorist Confinement Center in Tecoluca, El Salvador. (Alex Brandon-Pool/Getty Images)

A federal immigration court in Baltimore further determined Abrego Garcia was not eligible for release because he «failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that his release from custody would not pose a danger to others, as the evidence shows that he is a verified member of MS-13.»

The court held that «the fact that a ‘past, proven, and reliable source of infonnation [sic]’ verified the Respondent’s gang membership, rank, and gang name is sufficient to support that the Respondent is a gang member» and that Abrego had «failed to present evidence to rebut that assertion.»

«Kilmar Abrego Garcia is not a ‘Maryland Man’—he is an MS-13 gang member involved in human trafficking who entered the United States illegally,» DHS posted on X. «His deportation to El Salvador was always going to be the end result.»

Advertisement

DHS bashed Van Hollen for advocating Abrego Garcia’s release, saying the senator «has done more to bring a MS-13 gang member, human trafficker and illegal alien back to Maryland than he has to help keep his American constituents safe or advocate for the victims of these vicious gangs like MS-13.»

«While Sen. Van Hollen and the mainstream media peddle a sob story about a brutal MS-13 gang member, Secretary Noem stands with the victims of illegal alien crime,» said DHS. «We hear far too much about the gang members and criminals’ sob stories and not enough about their victims.»

DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin posted some more details about his arrest, saying, in addition to being apprehended with other MS-13 members, he was found with «rolls of cash and drugs» and «wearing what is effectively MS-13’s uniform.»

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

Speaking with Fox News on Monday, McLaughlin said Abrego Garcia is «exactly where he belongs, home in El Salvador.»

«The media would love for you to believe that this is some media darling, that he is just some Maryland father, but Osama bin Laden was also a father, and yet he wasn’t a good guy, and they are actually both terrorists,» she added. «He should be in this El Salvador prison, prison for terrorists, and I hope he will remain there.»

Advertisement

Migrant Crime,Immigration,Illegal Immigrants,Border security,Trump’s First 100 Days

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Energía renovable gana peso en Panamá, Gobierno busca aumentar su participación en la matriz energética

Published

on


Actualmente, cerca del 65% de la generación eléctrica en Panamá proviene de fuentes renovables, principalmente hidroeléctricas.(Imagen Ilustrativa Infobae)

Panamá aspira a que más del 85% de su generación eléctrica provenga de fuentes renovables en los próximos años, una meta que, según las autoridades, debe construirse sin descuidar la seguridad energética ni la estabilidad del sistema.

Así lo afirmó el secretario nacional de Energía, Rodrigo Rodríguez J., durante el Foro de Energía organizado por la Asociación Panameña de Ejcutivos de Empresa (APEDE), al señalar que actualmente el país registra cerca de 65% de su matriz energética basada en fuentes limpias, principalmente hidroeléctricas.

Advertisement

Rodríguez explicó que, aunque el objetivo es elevar progresivamente la participación de las energías renovables, Panamá no puede prescindir completamente de un componente térmico que respalde el sistema en momentos de baja generación solar, ausencia de viento o períodos de sequía que afecten a las hidroeléctricas.

“No todo el parque puede ser renovable”, sostuvo, al subrayar que la confiabilidad del suministro sigue siendo una prioridad para el Estado.

El funcionario detalló que, en términos regionales, Panamá parte de una posición favorable, ya que su matriz histórica ha sido mayoritariamente limpia en comparación con otros países.

Advertisement

Entre el 60% y 65% de la generación anual proviene de fuentes renovables tradicionales, especialmente plantas hidroeléctricas de embalse y de pasada. Sin embargo, reconoció que el desafío está en diversificar esa base con solar, eólica y almacenamiento energético.

El secretario de Energía, Rodrigo
El secretario de Energía, Rodrigo Rodríguez J., informó que en marzo se lanzarán licitaciones para nuevas plantas eólicas e hidroeléctricas con participación de inversionistas locales y extranjeros. Cortesía Apede

Durante el encuentro, la presidenta de APEDE, Giulia De Sanctis, destacó que el tema energético es fundamental no solo para las empresas, sino también para los hogares y la competitividad del país.

Afirmó que el foro permitió debatir sobre redes, hubs y el potencial de Panamá como un centro energético regional, así como los retos regulatorios y tecnológicos que enfrenta el sector.

De Santis subrayó que uno de los ejes centrales de las discusiones fue el desarrollo de licitaciones públicas con reglas claras, transparencia y criterios técnicos actualizados. “No basta con los avances tecnológicos, también se necesita seguridad jurídica y procesos confiables”, indicó, al referirse a la importancia de atraer inversión privada en proyectos de generación y transmisión.

Advertisement

En ese contexto, Rodríguez confirmó que el Gobierno prepara dos licitaciones clave: una para plantas nuevas, principalmente eólicas e hidroeléctricas, y otra para plantas existentes.

La primera está prevista para inicios de marzo y la segunda para finales del mismo mes. Según el secretario, existe un alto nivel de interés empresarial, tanto de inversionistas locales como extranjeros.

La presidenta de la Asociación
La presidenta de la Asociación Panameña de Ejecutivos de Empresa, Giulia De Sanctis, destacó la necesidad de reglas claras, transparencia y seguridad jurídica para fortalecer las inversiones en el sector energético. Cortesía Apede

El funcionario señaló que estas licitaciones forman parte de una estrategia para fortalecer la capacidad instalada, reducir la volatilidad tarifaria y mejorar la resiliencia del sistema eléctrico. Añadió que los procesos se han diseñado para garantizar competencia sana, participación abierta y criterios técnicos acordes con las nuevas demandas del mercado.

Otro de los ejes abordados fue el impulso al bioetanol como parte de la transición energética. Rodríguez recordó que el Ejecutivo presentó en octubre pasado un proyecto de ley ante la Asamblea Nacional para establecer una mezcla obligatoria del 10% de etanol en las gasolinas. De aprobarse la iniciativa, el país podría iniciar la producción local y la mezcla comercial hacia finales de 2027.

Advertisement

“El proceso legal es clave”, afirmó el secretario, al indicar que el proyecto se encuentra en manos de la Comisión de Comercio, donde se desarrollan consultas con los sectores involucrados. Estimó que, si el cronograma se cumple, la primera producción nacional de etanol podría concretarse entre 2027 y 2028, marcando un hito en la política energética.

El programa de bioetanol contempla
El programa de bioetanol contempla una mezcla obligatoria del 10% y una inversión estimada de $500 millones en el sector azucarero. (Revista Chacra)

De acuerdo con estimaciones del sector azucarero, la puesta en marcha del programa de bioetanol implicaría una inversión inicial cercana a los $500 millones, destinada a la compra de tierras, construcción de destilerías e instalación de infraestructura. También se requeriría ampliar la superficie cultivada de caña en unas 22 mil hectáreas para abastecer el 10% de la demanda.

El gremio azucarero ha señalado que el proyecto podría generar más de 30 mil empleos directos e indirectos, principalmente en el interior del país. Además, destacó que el financiamiento multilateral y bancario ya ha mostrado interés, condicionado a la estabilidad normativa y al respeto de los plazos legales.

Desde APEDE, De Santis respaldó el enfoque del bioetanol como una oportunidad para fortalecer la autosuficiencia energética y reducir la dependencia del petróleo importado. No obstante, insistió en que cualquier política pública debe construirse con consenso, claridad regulatoria y garantías para los inversionistas y consumidores.

Advertisement
El secretario de Energía, Rodrigo
El secretario de Energía, Rodrigo Rodríguez J., indicó que los estudios sobre hidrocarburos en el Caribe están en fase de revisión sin decisiones concretas. REUTERS/Christian Hartmann

En materia de planificación, Rodríguez adelantó que en marzo se lanzará oficialmente el proceso para elaborar el nuevo Plan Energético Nacional 2026-2040, cuya formulación tomará alrededor de 18 meses. El documento definirá las metas de generación, transmisión, almacenamiento y eficiencia energética para las próximas dos décadas.

El secretario también se refirió a los avances en la digitalización del sistema eléctrico, incluyendo procesos tarifarios y operativos. Explicó que la modernización debe realizarse de forma escalonada, para evitar impactos abruptos en las tarifas, especialmente en un contexto de transición tecnológica.

Rodríguez respondió además sobre los estudios para explorar posibles hidrocarburos en aguas del Caribe panameño, desarrollados en cooperación con Colombia. Ante la pregunta de Infobae sobre el tema, el funcionario indicó que el tema está siendo retomado, aunque por ahora no existe ninguna decisión concreta. “Se hicieron análisis preliminares, pero estamos en fase de revisión”, precisó.

El funcionario aclaró que cualquier avance en esta materia estará sujeto a evaluaciones técnicas, ambientales y económicas, y que no se trata de un proyecto inmediato. La eventual exploración, dijo, deberá alinearse con los compromisos de sostenibilidad y transición energética del país.

Advertisement

Para el sector privado, la combinación entre energías renovables, respaldo térmico, biocombustibles y planificación de largo plazo será determinante para mantener la competitividad. De Santis destacó que Panamá cuenta con una base legal sólida, pero necesita fortalecer la ejecución y el seguimiento de las políticas públicas.



Corporate Events,Energy Markets,Europe

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Reporter’s Notebook: Clintons call for open Epstein files hearing after months of defying subpoenas

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Since there was such a tempest over Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show, perhaps there’s a solution at hand. This compromise would satisfy both red and blue America. And the exhibition would transfix the country: Have former President Bill Clinton and President Donald Trump testify at halftime about the Epstein files.

Advertisement

Republicans believe former President Clinton has something to hide about Jeffrey Epstein. Democrats think the same about President Trump. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the former president and Hillary Clinton to testify about the Epstein files. After a lot of wrangling, the Clintons are due to appear for closed-door depositions later this month.

But both Bill and Hillary Clinton are now calling for open sessions. And Democrats believe that such an appearance at a public session — by a former President — would establish a precedent to lug in President Trump to answer questions about what he knew about Epstein.

GHISLAINE MAXWELL TO APPEAR BEFORE HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE LAWMAKERS FOR EPSTEIN PROBE DEPOSITION

Advertisement

Hillary Clinton addresses her staff and supporters about the results of the U.S. election as her husband, former U.S. President Bill Clinton, applauds at a hotel in the Manhattan borough of New York, Nov. 9, 2016.  (Reuters/Carlos Barria)

One architect of the law compelling the release of the Epstein files, applauded demands last week by the former First Couple to testify at a televised open hearing. Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., said the former president is an important witness.

«As long as [the hearing is] focused on Epstein, and it’s not a wild goose chase — it’s not trying to score political points or embarrass either President Clinton or President Trump, it is asking legitimate questions about what they knew took place and who they knew were participating in heinous acts,» said Khanna. «That should be a legitimate point of inquiry.»

Advertisement

After agreeing to a closed-door deposition later this month, Hillary Clinton took to X. She wrote to Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., saying, «If you want this fight let’s have it in public.» 

Former President Clinton echoed his wife the next day on X, also calling for a public session. The former commander-in-chief declared that he won’t be used «as a prop in a closed door Kangaroo Court.» 

A spokeswoman for Comer accused the former first couple of «moving the goalposts.» Comer was always open to a hearing. But after a closed-door deposition.

Advertisement

«Depositions have historically been much more substantive than hearings,» said Comer. «Hearings unfortunately, have become more of an entertainment thing.»

It’s hard to track exactly what the Clintons wanted.

The House Oversight Committee voted on a bipartisan basis last August to subpoena both Bill and Hillary Clinton for depositions — along with a host of other prominent figures like former Attorney General Bill Barr. After a lot of haggling, the committee subpoenaed them to appear at dates in October. The Clintons defied those. Then the committee assigned them dates just before Christmas. But neither showed then because of a funeral. The committee requested that the Clintons give them dates for January appearances. They didn’t. The committee then assigned them additional dates for January testimony. They skipped out on those. That’s when Comer threatened to hold the Clintons in contempt of Congress if they didn’t appear in January. The Oversight Committee voted — in bipartisan fashion — for contempt. The House Rules Committee planned last week to prep a measure to force the entire House to vote on contempt — and send criminal referrals for the Clintons to the Justice Department for prosecution after they defied the subpoenas.

Advertisement

REVEALED: TRUMP CALLED POLICE CHIEF TO SUPPORT EPSTEIN PROBE, AND LAWMAKERS NAMED 6 MEN SHIELDED FROM EXPOSURE

Comer addresses the press after Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition.

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., alongside Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., left, speaks to reporters after a closed-door deposition with Ghislaine Maxwell, the former girlfriend and confidante of sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 9, 2026. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

But the Clintons finally agreed to depositions at the end of this month. And once that was on the calendar, the duo began calling for public hearings.

There is a method behind this madness. There isn’t a loyalty among younger Congressional Democrats to the Clintons. In fact, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., was steamed at some Democrats for wanting the Clintons to appear. Younger Democrats don’t have the same reverence for the Clintons as older Democrats. Hillary Clinton ran for president a decade ago. She hasn’t been a senator since 2009. She last served as Secretary of State in early 2013. President Clinton left the Oval Office more than a quarter-century ago.

Advertisement

However, this is the Democrats’ gambit:

If former President Clinton appears about the Epstein files, it may be tough to make the case that President Trump shouldn’t appear.

«Certainly it does set the precedent. President Trump was subpoenaed during the January 6th investigations and didn’t come in. He cited some form of executive privilege. And so we’re kind of forcing the Clintons to come in with the threat of criminal contempt. Then that is a precedent that we are setting,» said Rep. Suhas Subramanyam, D-Va. «In other countries, like the UK, the Prime Minister regularly comes before the Parliament. And so it’s not like it’s unprecedented around the world.»

Advertisement

Granted, that’s a parliamentary system where the prime minister is a member of Parliament in the United Kingdom. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer regularly appears for «Prime Minister’s Questions» every Wednesday at noon in London. Members of Parliament usually pepper the prime minister with questions and scoff in a scene which resembles something out of Monty Python.

But the American and British systems are fundamentally different.

Getting a sitting or former President — and even first lady — before Congress is rare but not unheard of.

Advertisement

BONDI TO FACE GRILLING IN HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OVER EPSTEIN FILES, WEAPONIZATION ALLEGATIONS

Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein

Former President Bill Clinton was seen in photos with Jeffrey Epstein as part of a DOJ Epstein files release on Friday, Dec. 19. (Department of Justice)

There are three prominent examples of sitting Presidents appearing before Congress. President Abraham Lincoln testified voluntarily before the House Judiciary Committee in 1862. The New York Herald published his «State of the Union» message to Congress just before it was sent to Capitol Hill. Presidents sent written «reports» in those days. They did not give speeches to Congress. Lawmakers probed the leak of the message to Congress. It was speculated that Herald reporter Henry Wikoff got the message ahead of time thanks to his friendship with Mary Todd Lincoln. The House Sergeant at Arms briefly held Wikoff — and released him after the president spoke to the Judiciary Committee.

President Woodrow Wilson appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1919 to discuss a treaty with Germany and establishing the League of Nations. Wilson’s push for the League of Nations failed. The Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles.

Advertisement

President Gerald Ford had been in office two-and-a-half months before he appeared voluntarily before the House Judiciary Committee in the fall of 1974. Ford told lawmakers that his pardon of former President Richard Nixon wasn’t something they bargained about. Ford told the committee that he pardoned Nixon because his physical and mental health fell into a steep decline.

Former President Harry Truman appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1955 to testify about the United Nations Charter.

Ford came back as a former president in 1983 for a Senate hearing on the bicentennial of the Constitution.

Advertisement

And there are examples of both sitting and former first ladies testifying, too.

Eleanor Roosevelt testified twice as first lady. Once about labor issues. Then, about the organization of volunteers for the civilian defense agency before World War II.

Rosalynn Carter testified about mental health as first lady.

Advertisement

Hillary Clinton famously testified about her husband’s health care plan — even though it was dubbed (often derisively) «Hillarycare» in the fall of 1993. She testified multiple times as Secretary of State. Most notably in early 2013 regarding Benghazi. 

And, first lady Laura Bush was en route to Capitol Hill to testify before a Senate panel about early childhood education on 9/11. The committee cancelled the hearing after the attacks in New York and at the Pentagon. 

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

So, many Republicans are game to hear from the Clintons about the Epstein files. Frankly, some were more interested in just holding them in contempt than actually gleaning anything about Epstein. But it looks like the Clintons will at least sit for depositions in a few weeks. Whether there’s a hearing or not is unclear. Some Republicans may even push for that. But caveat emptor. An open session for the Clintons will only intensify the push by Democrats — and some GOPers — to hear from President Trump. 

Their testimony might not come during the Super Bowl halftime show. But open testimony by a former President and a sitting President would be a political Super Bowl.

Advertisement

politics,the clintons,jeffrey epstein,republicans,house of representatives politics,congress,william barr

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

México dice que la munición incautada a un cártel es de una fábrica del ejército de EE.UU.

Published

on


CIUDAD DE MÉXICO — Aproximadamente la mitad de los cartuchos de alto poder calibre .50 que las autoridades mexicanas han confiscado a los cárteles desde 2012 fueron rastreados hasta una fábrica de municiones en las afueras de Kansas City, Missouri, que es propiedad del gobierno de Estados Unidos, dijo el martes el secretario de Defensa de México.

La fábrica, Lake City Army Ammunition Plant, es el mayor fabricante de municiones para fusiles utilizados por el ejército estadounidense.

Advertisement

El secretario de Defensa de México, general Ricardo Trevilla Trejo, dijo que se han incautado alrededor de 137.000 cartuchos calibre .50 desde 2012.

De ellos, agregó, el 47% provenían de Lake City y se vendieron en armerías del sur de Estados Unidos.

La revelación se produjo en respuesta a la pregunta de un periodista sobre una reciente investigación conjunta de The New York Times y el Consorcio Internacional de Periodistas de Investigación que expuso cómo la munición de Lake City, que también ha sido utilizada por tiradores masivos en Estados Unidos, se ha convertido en un elemento básico para los grupos del crimen organizado en México.

Advertisement

Trevilla Trejo también afirmó que desde octubre de 2024, cuando Claudia Sheinbaum asumió la presidencia, las autoridades mexicanas habían decomisado 18,000 armas de fuego, de las cuales casi el 80% provenían de Estados Unidos.

Entre las armas más destructivas decomisadas, añadió, se encontraban rifles Barrett calibre .50, lanzagranadas, lanzacohetes y ametralladoras de diversos calibres.

El lunes, Sheinbaum dijo que su administración estaba revisando los informes del Times y el ICIJ “para que podamos hablar con el gobierno de Estados Unidos sobre este tema y entender cómo es posible que estas armas, que son para uso exclusivo del Ejército de Estados Unidos, estén ingresando a México”.

Advertisement

La investigación concluyó, de hecho, que los cartuchos calibre .50 fabricados en Lake City no estaban restringidos al ejército estadounidense.

El Ejército estadounidense ha permitido que contratistas privados que operan la planta de Lake City vendan munición a distribuidores, revendedores y tiendas minoristas, poniéndola a disposición del mercado civil.

Al menos 16 minoristas on line han vendido munición perforante fabricada en Lake City o hecha con componentes de la planta, según un recuento del ICIJ y el Times.

Advertisement

“Lo irónico es que los gobiernos de México y Estados Unidos buscan lo mismo: reducir las muertes” causadas por los cárteles, dijo Cecilia Farfán Méndez, directora del Observatorio de América del Norte de la Iniciativa Global Contra el Crimen Organizado Transnacional.

“Pero mientras los grupos criminales tengan fácil acceso a este tipo de calibres y armas, es como si estuvieran subsidiando la generación de esta violencia”.

El Ejército de EE.UU. no respondió en detalle a preguntas sobre el uso de munición de Lake City por parte de los cárteles de la droga.

Advertisement

Un portavoz declaró previamente que permitir las ventas comerciales desde la planta ahorraba a los contribuyentes decenas de millones al año.

Las balas de Lake City han terminado en manos de miembros de cárteles mexicanos, que las han utilizado para aterrorizar tanto a civiles como a fuerzas de seguridad, según documentos obtenidos por periodistas.

Armados con armas de fuego calibre .50, hombres armados del cártel han derribado helicópteros, asesinado a funcionarios del gobierno, disparado contra fuerzas policiales y militares y matado a civiles.

Advertisement

Defensas

“El blindaje que tenemos no puede proteger a nuestro personal del tipo de penetración que este cartucho es capaz de hacer”, dijo a la prensa en 2024 Luis Cresencio Sandoval, predecesor de Trevilla Trejo como secretario de Defensa de México.

Se refería a una bala calibre .50 de Lake City que se había utilizado para atacar un convoy militar en el norte de México, matando a un soldado e hiriendo a otros tres.

Advertisement

México tiene estrictas restricciones sobre quién puede comprar y poseer armas, las cuales solo se pueden adquirir legalmente en dos tiendas administradas por el ejército mexicano.

Aun así, la mayoría de los tipos y calibres están reservados exclusivamente para el ejército y las fuerzas del orden.

El gobierno mexicano estima que entre 200,000 y 500,000 armas de fuego se trafican ilegalmente a México desde Estados Unidos cada año.

Advertisement

El año pasado, la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos desestimó por unanimidad una demanda interpuesta por el gobierno mexicano contra importantes fabricantes estadounidenses, que argumentaba que las empresas habían instigado la venta ilegal de armas de fuego a los cárteles mexicanos de la droga.

En su fallo, el tribunal dictaminó que la incapacidad de los fabricantes para impedir que los minoristas independientes realizaran ventas ilegales no cumplía con los altos requisitos legales para la instigación.

Pero el tribunal reconoció la afirmación de México de que se vendían armas estadounidenses a traficantes mexicanos.

Advertisement

«No dudamos mucho de que, como afirma la denuncia, se producen algunas de estas ventas, y que los fabricantes lo saben», declaró el fallo.

México presentó una demanda por separado en Arizona contra cinco comerciantes de armas.

Reclamo

Advertisement

Sheinbaum ha pedido constantemente una mayor cooperación de la administración Trump para detener el flujo de armas y municiones de fabricación estadounidense a México, comparándolo a menudo con la presión de Washington para que su país ponga fin al tráfico de fentanilo.

Han surgido algunas iniciativas conjuntas para aumentar las inspecciones y las incautaciones en ambos lados de la frontera, así como para compartir más información entre los gobiernos.

Sin embargo, en una entrevista exclusiva el año pasado, Omar García Harfuch, secretario de Seguridad de México, declaró a la prensa del Times que los esfuerzos de Estados Unidos para reducir el suministro de armas habían sido insuficientes.

Advertisement

Si a los cárteles mexicanos les resultara más difícil “obtener ese tipo de armas”, añadió Harfuch, “definitivamente sería una lucha diferente”.

c.2026 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias