INTERNACIONAL
GOP holdouts unmoved by Trump’s ‘big, beautiful’ trip to Capitol Hill

President Donald Trump’s rallying speech to House Republicans Tuesday morning wasn’t enough to convince some holdouts to unite behind his «big, beautiful bill» ahead of a planned vote this week.
Trump urged Republicans to cease infighting on Medicaid reform and state and local tax (SALT) deduction caps at the House GOP’s weekly conference meeting. Several Republicans who emerged said they were still concerned enough to oppose the bill, however.
House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris, Rep. Eric Burlison of Missouri, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and representatives Nick LaLota, Mike Lawler and Andrew Garbino of New York told Fox News Digital Tuesday they would vote against the bill if changes were not made.
On the other hand, Trump did persuade some people. Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina, one of several Republicans to sink a committee vote on the bill Friday, told reporters he would review it and make a «judgment call» ahead of a 1 a.m. meeting to advance the bill through the House Rules Committee.
INSIDE TRUMP’S URGENT MEETING WITH HOUSE GOP TO PASS THE ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL’
Rep. Mike Lawler (left) and Rep. Thomas Massie (right) said President Donald Trump did not convince them Tuesday to vote for his «big, beautiful bill» in its current form. (Getty Images)
Norman said Trump did a «fantastic job» and delivered «one of the best speeches I’ve heard» at the House GOP meeting, and he urged his blue state colleagues to «take the words the president said to heart about SALT.»
CONSERVATIVE RIPS BLUE STATE REPUBLICAN’S PROPOSAL TO RAISE TAXES ON WEALTHY IN SALT DEBATE
Norman and Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, are both members of the powerful rules panel who have not been shy about their concerns with the current bill. The committee acts as the final gatekeeper before most legislation sees a full House vote.
Roy did not appear to attend Trump’s speech but told reporters Monday evening the 1 a.m. Wednesday vote should be postponed.
But the New York Republicans weren’t budging after Trump’s «big, beautiful» speech, maintaining the bill doesn’t go far enough to deliver for middle-class New Yorkers on the SALT deduction cap.
«This is the single biggest issue that I’ve talked about, and, with all due respect to the president, I’m not budging,» Lawler said.
«Between property taxes and income taxes, it blows well past the $30,000 cap with the $400,000 income cap. So, as I’ve said repeatedly, that is insufficient. We will continue the dialogue with leadership, but as it stands right now, I do not support the bill,» Lawler said.

Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill. (Reuters/Anna Rose Layden)
Lawler said SALT is one of the biggest issues affecting his district in New York and campaigned on never supporting a tax bill that doesn’t «adequately lift the cap.»
«The president can say whatever he wants, and I respect him, but the fact is, I certainly understand my district. I’m one of only three Republican members that won in a district Kamala Harris won, and I did so for reasons,» Lawler said.
«We need a little more SALT on the table to get to this,» fellow New York Republican LaLota added. «I hope the president’s presence motivates my leadership to give us a number that we can go sell back home.»
LaLota said while he is still a «no,» he hopes «the president’s presence here today motivates some folks in the Ways and Means Committee and my leadership to give us a number to which we can actually say ‘yes.’»

Rep. Nick Lalota, R-N.Y., leaves a meeting of the House Republican Conference. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
When asked if Trump did enough to ease concerns in Tuesday’s meeting, Garbarino, another New York Republican, said, «No. There were no specifics. … It was more of a rally. We need to get this done.»
«We share President Trump’s call for unity within the House Republican Conference,» Rep. Young Kim, R-Calif., said in a joint statement after Trump’s visit to Capitol Hill.
«We hope his remarks today motivate the Speaker to advance a SALT proposal that delivers meaningful relief for our middle-class constituents, as we have worked in good faith with House Leadership for more than a year,» the statement from Kim, Garbarino, Lawler, LaLota and Rep. Tom Kean, R-N.J., said.

Rep. Young Kim, R-Calif., speaks during a hearing March 10, 2021, on Capitol Hill. (Ting Shen-Pool/Getty Images)
Meanwhile, Trump urged Republicans not to «f— with» Medicaid in his speech, though different factions came to different conclusions about what he meant.
Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee, who was not in the room for Trump’s speech, called for more cuts to the entitlement program in an X post Tuesday afternoon but told Fox News Digital he was opposed to the legislation as written.
«I agree with President Trump — we must crush the waste, fraud, and abuse. Liberal states like California and New York are abusing Medicaid — and making you pay for it. Illegal aliens and freeloaders have no right to taxpayer-funded benefits,» Ogles said on X.
Other fiscal conservatives, like Ogles, who were in the room, said the bill does not go far enough to reform Medicaid and would also vote «no» in the bill’s current form.

Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., outside the Capitol building Dec. 18, 2024. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
«I think it’s inappropriate for us to say we’re not going to touch it and then leave all of this fraud that’s happening in the system,» Burlison said.
Harris, the House Freedom Caucus chair, said, «I can’t support the bill. It does not eliminate waste, fraud and abuse in Medicaid. The president called for waste, fraud and abuse to be eliminated. I don’t think that’s where the bill sits.»
Massie, known for being a libertarian, was unconvinced by Trump’s appearance, telling reporters that his constituents didn’t «vote for increased deficits and Biden-level spending.»
He acknowledged that younger members or those who harbor ambitions for higher office would likely fall in line, however.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
«I think he probably closed the deal in there,» Massie said.
SALT deduction caps and Medicaid remain two of the biggest sticking points in Republican negotiations. SALT deduction caps primarily benefit people living in high-cost-of-living areas like New York City, Los Angeles and their surrounding suburbs. Republicans representing those areas have argued that raising the SALT deduction cap is a critical issue and that a failure to address it could cost the GOP the House majority in the 2026 midterms.
Republicans in redder, lower-tax areas have said in response that SALT deductions favor wealthy people living in Democrat-controlled states and that such deductions reward progressive high-tax policies.
It was Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 that first instituted caps on SALT deductions, setting the maximum at $10,000 for both married couples and single filers.
SALT Caucus members have rejected House Republican leaders’ offer to increase that to $30,000.
Members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, meanwhile, are pushing for the bill to be more aggressive in cutting waste, fraud and abuse in the Medicaid system, including a faster timeline for implementing work requirements for able-bodied recipients. Currently, the legislation has work requirements kicking in 2029.
They also want to restructure Medicaid cost-sharing to put a bigger burden on the states. Moderates, meanwhile, have been wary of making significant cuts to the program.
House GOP leaders are hoping to hold a full House vote on the bill this week.
Politics,House Of Representatives,Republicans,Donald Trump
INTERNACIONAL
Rusos en Brasil: La fábrica de espías

Factor común
Fantasmas en el sistema
La gente especial de Putin
Un avance en el caso
‘¿Qué es peor que ser arrestado?’
‘Vas a escuchar cosas sobre mí’
INTERNACIONAL
Trump unveils ‘Golden Dome’ missile shield, blindsides key senators

Before President Donald Trump’s dramatic reveal of the «Golden Dome» missile defense project on Tuesday, the proposal wasn’t even on the radar of many lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
Several senators told Fox News Digital they had received no briefing on the initiative’s costs – and some hadn’t heard of it at all.
«I don’t support blank checks. I haven’t seen the cost figures,» Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., told Fox News Digital.
Two senior members of the Senate Appropriations Defense Subcommittee, one Republican and one Democrat, asked, «what’s Golden Dome?» in response to questions about the project Trump commissioned in January.
CHINA ACCUSES US OF ‘TURNING SPACE INTO A WARZONE’ WITH TRUMP’S GOLDEN DOME MISSILE DEFENSE PROJECT
Trump has floated a $125 billion estimate and says it could be completed in three years by the end of his term. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque )
Trump’s sweeping plan – pitched as an American version of Israel’s Iron Dome – carries an ambitious price tag and timeline. He’s floated a $125 billion estimated cost and says it could be built in three years, by the end of his term. A government funding package moving through Congress, dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, includes $25 billion to jumpstart the project.
But defense experts and even some Republican allies anticipate the cost to be much higher.
«This is not going to be a $25 billion or $35 billion project. It will likely cost in the trillions if and when Golden Dome is completed,» said Sen. Tim Sheehy, R-Mont., who announced plans to form a Golden Dome Caucus during a recent Washington Times defense industry event earlier this month.
Sheehy warned that simply scaling up Israel’s Iron Dome to protect the U.S. is «a fundamentally different technological proposition.»
«The challenges don’t scale linearly with the size of Israel, which is the size of New Jersey,» he added.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated the project could cost around $500 billion – though some believe even that figure is likely too low.
CBO estimated that the space-based interceptors portion of the dome could cost at least $161 billion but up to $542 billion. But it didn’t account for any ground-based interceptors in that cost.
«I’ve been 34 years in this business, and I’ve never seen an early estimate that was too high,» said Space Force chief of space operations Gen. Chance Saltzman. «We don’t always understand the full level of complexity until you’re actually in execution, doing the detailed planning.»
LASERS, SPACE RADARS, MISSILE INTERCEPTORS: DEFENSE LEADERS LAY OUT VISION FOR TRUMP’S ‘GOLDEN DOME’ PROJECT

Digitized concept design of Golden Dome demonstrates how the shield would utilize space-based interceptors to stop a missile. (Lockheed Martin)
Some Republican lawmakers suggest the potential benefits outweigh the massive spending required.
«It might very well prevent a war,» Sen. Mike Rounds, R-N.D., said. «When we talk about spending billions on defense, that is small compared to one single major war – not only in trillions of dollars, but in bloodshed.»
Once a missile is launched toward the U.S. homeland, the Golden Dome system aims to detect it, and orbital systems would aim to hit the missile during its «boost» phase, either with a laser or a kinetic interceptor. Otherwise, ground-based systems could deploy to knock it off its path.
Others noted competing defense priorities.
«That’s gonna be a long, drawn-out process, and it’s gonna cost a lot of money,» said Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala. «Right now, we’re redoing our missile silos… we’re transitioning to different types of warfare. If we’re gonna do [Golden Dome], we do it the right way.»
Supporters of the plan argue that technological advances have dramatically lowered the cost of missile defense, enough to potentially flip decades-old strategic assumptions.
Chuck DeVore, a defense expert at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and former Reagan administration official, said the old logic – that it’s always cheaper to build offensive missiles than defenses – may no longer apply.

Golden Dome aims to protect against adversaries’ missiles, like this North Korean test ICBM above. (KCNA via REUTERS )
«That calculation is changing now,» DeVore said. «With low-cost orbit launches and inexpensive electronics, it may actually be less expensive to defend against nuclear missiles than to build them. If that’s the case, we’re at a truly revolutionary inflection point.»
DeVore also warned that traditionalists in the defense establishment may push back.
«You’re going to see people defending the status quo,» he said. «They’ll say we need that money for more conventional defense – more divisions, more jet fighters, maybe another aircraft carrier.»
Still, DeVore argued that a homeland missile defense system is overdue.
«The ability to truly defend the homeland and save American lives is better than mutual assured destruction – especially in an age of nuclear proliferation where we can’t always be sure where the threat is coming from.»
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., agreed on the project’s importance, even as he said he hadn’t been briefed on the cost and needs of the project.
«I think it’s the most important thing we could do to keep our homeland safe.»
Defense Spending & Budget News,Air And Space,National Security,Pentagon,Senate,Donald Trump
INTERNACIONAL
Scarlett Johansson: “Todos los actores tienen miedo a desaparecer”

Eleanor the Great es una reflexión sobre el paso del tiempo y la necesidad de mantener ciertas historias vivas, afirma su directora, Scarlett Johansson, una intérprete que cree que “todos los actores tienen miedo a desaparecer”.
Johansson matiza inmediatamente su declaración en una entrevista con periodistas en Cannes, al día siguiente del estreno de su primer largometraje como realizadora.
“Bueno, creo que he trabajado el tiempo suficiente para dejar de preocuparme sobre desaparecer, y creo que es liberador. Pero ¿no dirías que todos los actores se preocupan de eso?” pregunta, dirigiéndose a la actriz June Squibb, de 95 años, protagonista de su película.
“Claro, y creo que todos intentamos hacer lo correcto. Nunca estamos seguros de nada”, responde esa actriz que logra un papel protagonista a una edad extremadamente inusual en el mundo del cine.

Eleanor es una anciana que vive en Florida cuya mejor amiga, una superviviente del Holocausto, fallece. Devastada por el deceso, se muda a Nueva York, donde no acaba de reanudar los vínculos con su hija.
Un día entra en contacto con un grupo de conversación sobre la Shoah y obsesionada por el recuerdo de su amiga, se apropia de su historia, lo que provoca una cascada de malentendidos que no puede frenar.
Ni siquiera se atreve a contar la verdad a su inesperada nueva amiga, una joven estudiante de Periodismo interpretada por Erin Kellyman (“Solo”).
Pero la cinta no aborda solamente el miedo individual a la muerte, sino a la desaparición de historias, como el genocidio perpetrado por los nazis.

“Eleanor dice que si ella no cuenta la historia [de su amiga], nadie lo hará. Y en estos tiempos en que estamos debatiendo constantemente quién tiene el derecho a contar la historia de otra persona, también tenemos que enfrentarnos al hecho de las historias deben ser contadas, sino desaparecerán”, añade Johansson.
La actriz de 40 años toma buena nota de la pléyade de prestigiosos realizadores con los que ha trabajado, como Woody Allen o Sofia Coppola, para dirigir con eficacia esta película de aire “indie”, alejada de grandes producciones como la saga de los Vengadores.
Scarlett Johansson asegura que la película era una oportunidad inmejorable para trabajar con una actriz que admira desde hace años.
“Simplemente estaba entusiasmada de poder trabajar con Judy. Es tan aguda, tan eficiente. Hizo que mi trabajo fuera tan fácil, porque me di cuenta de que le estaba dando instrucciones a alguien que ha estado tomando notas y acatándolas durante 70 años”, añade.

Nacida en 1929, Squibb arrancó su carrera en el teatro, y tuvo que aguardar hasta 1990, a los 61 años, para rodar su primera película, Alice, bajo la batuta de Woody Allen.
De ahí se encadenaron los rodajes, como si necesitara acelerar todo el tiempo que no había vivido ante las cámaras: El tiempo de la inocencia, dirigida por Martin Scorsese, o Nebraska, que le permitió lograr una nominación al Óscar a la mejor actriz secundaria.
A la pregunta de si Eleanor the Great le vuelve a permitir soñar con un Óscar, replica con una carcajada: “¡Siempre sueño con un Óscar!”.
“Pero creo que esta película merece que le den una oportunidad, tanto como a la dirección como al mejor papel secundario”, dice con elegancia, señalando a Erin Kellyman.
“Scarlett es uno de los directores más considerados con los que he trabajado”, explica Kellyman, que en breve estrenará 28 años más tarde, de la saga de horror de Danny Boyle.
Johansson ha trabajado en el cine desde la edad de 10 años, y ha sido nominada dos veces al Óscar. Como la inmensa mayoría de megaestrellas de Hollywood, tiene su propia productora.
“Cuando recibí el guión llamé a mi socio y le dije: ‘creo que puedo dirigir esto’. Nunca le había dicho eso antes”, recuerda Johansson.
Fuente: AFP
Arts / Culture / Entertainment,Europe,CANNES
-
DEPORTE2 días ago
¿Dónde ver EN VIVO y ONLINE River Plate vs. Platense por el Torneo Apertura 2025?
-
POLITICA3 días ago
Desazón en el búnker de Pro ante un retroceso histórico en su bastión electoral
-
POLITICA1 día ago
Ritondo anticipó que Pro no apoyará la sesión para mejorar el haber de los jubilados y se alinea con Milei