Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Why Trump is suing the New York Times, his white whale, without citing mistakes

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Donald Trump grew up in Queens – a very nice neighborhood, to be sure, but still an outer borough.

Advertisement

Across the East River is the glittering skyline of what those who don’t live there call «the city.» And in the midst of that island is the New York Times building.

When the Times found the real estate developer worthy of profiling, in 1976, it was puff piece at first sight:

«He is tall, lean and blond, with dazzling white teeth, and he looks ever so much like Robert Redford. He rides around town in a chauffeured silver Cadillac with his initials, DJT, on the plates. He dates slinky fashion models, belongs to the most elegant clubs and, at only 30 years of age, estimates that he is worth «more than $200 million.»

Advertisement

TRUMP ANNOUNCES $15 BILLION LAWSUIT AGAINST THE NEW YORK TIMES FOR DEFAMATION, LIBEL

President Donald Trump is now suing the New York Times in a $15 billion defamation case. ( Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

The Redford reference is now sadly dated because of the actor’s passing in his sleep («Good way to go, I guess,» says Trump.) But in the piece, the «fast talker» acknowledged that his father, Fred Trump, who built middle-class housing in Queens and Brooklyn, only recently tried to crack the Manhattan market because of «psychology.»

Advertisement

(My favorite sentence: «Mr. Trump, who says he is publicity shy, allowed a reporter to accompany him on what he described as a typical work day.»)

I bring all this up, as a Brooklyn guy who has lived in Queens, to underscore how the president has always craved the paper’s approval.

TRUMP TAKES AIM AT CNN AND NEW YORK TIMES OVER IRAN STRIKE COVERAGE, BUT JOURNALISTS ARE SHRUGGING

Advertisement

And he got it – though the tabloids loved his feuds even more – until he went into politics.

Now the president has filed a $15 billion lawsuit against the New York Times.

It’s a strange suit, and it has a snowball’s chance in hell of succeeding. 

Advertisement
New York Times Building

A statement by the Times says the lawsuit «has no merit.» (Alexandra Schuler/picture alliance via Getty Images)

A Times statement says: «This lawsuit has no merit. It lacks any legitimate legal claims and instead is an attempt to stifle and discourage independent reporting.» What’s odd is that there was no triggering story, no specific inaccuracy alleged. That’s in sharp contrast to the president’s successful suits against CBS and ABC.

Of course, filing a suit – forcing even the biggest companies to spend a fortune on legal fees – is often the point.

Back in the 1980s, Trump sued the Pulitzer-winning Chicago Tribune architecture critic, Paul Gapp, for $500 million, for criticizing his plan to build America’s tallest building – a 150-story tower – in Manhattan. «One of the silliest things anyone could inflict on New York or any other city,» Gapp wrote.

Advertisement

Trump said he had «virtually torpedoed» the project, subjecting him to «public ridicule and contempt.» A judge later dismissed the suit as involving protected opinion.

The new suit names such reporters as chief White House correspondent Peter Baker and investigative journalist Michael Schmidt. It also names Susanne Craig and Ross Buettner, in part for their book «Lucky Loser: How Donald Trump Squandered His Father’s Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success.»

Craig revealed some of Trump’s tax returns, and she and her team won a Pulitzer for reporting on his finances.

Advertisement

In the ABC case, the network settled for $16 million for George Stephanopoulos having said Trump was found liable for rape, not «sexual abuse,» in the civil suit brought by E. Jean Carroll.

CBS also agreed to pay $16 million after the unethical editing of the Kamala Harris interview on «60 Minutes,» to make her sound more coherent.

He has also sued the Wall Street Journal’s parent company for reporting on his birthday message to Jeffrey Epstein – which he continues to deny, although the message from the predator’s files has surfaced with many similarities. 

Advertisement

CBS PARENT COMPANY SPARKS MASSIVE OUTRAGE WITH TRUMP LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT

In the lawsuit against the Times, filed in Florida, the president just trashes its campaign coverage. He says on Truth Social he is moving against «one of the worst and most degenerate newspapers in the History of our Country, becoming a virtual ‘mouthpiece’ for the Radical Left Democrat Party. I view it as the single largest illegal Campaign contribution, EVER. Their Endorsement of Kamala Harris was actually put dead center on the front page of The New York Times, something heretofore UNHEARD OF! The ‘Times’ has engaged in a decades long method of lying about your Favorite President (ME!), my family, business, the America First Movement, MAGA, and our Nation as a whole. I am PROUD to hold this once respected ‘rag’ responsible…» 

I’m going out on a limb to say that running an editorial on the front page falls under the category of free speech, and lots of papers have occasionally done it.

Advertisement

And remember, as the ultimate public figure, Trump would have to prove malice on the paper’s part, or reckless disregard for whether something is true or not.

ABC building

ABC settled for $16 million in its Trump-involved lawsuit. (Gary Hershorn/Getty Images)

Given that the president’s coverage is overwhelmingly negative, let’s say for the sake of argument that the Times is leading the resistance.

The Trump suit blames «persistent election interference from the legacy media.» 

Advertisement

But unless a plaintiff can point to a verifiable inaccuracy, it falls under the protective umbrella of First Amendment reporting and opinion.

SUBSCRIBE TO HOWIE’S MEDIA BUZZMETER PODCAST, A RIFF ON THE DAY’S HOTTEST STORIES

With Marine One in the background yesterday, ABC’s Jonathan Karl, whom Trump knows well, asked him about criticism of Pam Bondi’s investigations of left-wingers: «A lot of people, a lot of your allies, say hate speech is free speech.»

Advertisement

«She’d probably go after people like you! Because you treat me so unfairly! It’s hate! You have a lot of hate in your heart!»

A moment later, Trump said: «Maybe they’ll come after ABC. Well, ABC paid me $16 million recently for a form of hate speech, right? Your company paid me $16 million for a form of hate speech, so maybe they’ll have to go after you.»

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

For the president, a lawsuit is wielded as a weapon. That’s why he’s suing the New York Times, the paper across the river, with which he’s always had a love-hate relationship – and lately, mostly hate.

media buzz,donald trump,the new york times

INTERNACIONAL

«La estúpida isla»: Trump estalla contra Londres por el bloqueo de una base clave para atacar Irán

Published

on


La relación especial transatlántica entre Gran Bretaña y Estados Unidos, que tanto valoraba Winston Churchill en 1946, ha volado por el aire. El detonante fue la guerra en Irán, pero la desconfianza mutua tiene antecedentes que se basan en la imprevisibilidad de Donald Trump y la lealtad de su alianza con la OTAN.

Sir Keir Starmer no es Winston Churchill”, afirmó el presidente Donald Trump ayer, insinuando que el primer ministro había arruinado la relación especial por su negativa a autorizar el uso de bases británicas para atacar a Irán. Un insulto que tuvo amplio impacto hoy en la interpelación al primer ministro británico en la Cámara de los Comunes.

Advertisement

¿Una guerra sin plan viable?

El primer ministro laborista británico, Sir Keir Starmer, sugirió este miércoles que Donald Trump no tiene un plan viable para su guerra en Irán.

El primer ministro declaró este miércoles a los parlamentarios que Gran Bretaña no podía participar directamente en el conflicto de Oriente Medio sin un enfoque bien meditado por parte de Estados Unidos e Israel.

La administración Trump ha dado razones contradictorias para declarar la guerra. El secretario de Estado, Marco Rubio, declaró el lunes que Estados Unidos lo hizo solo tras enterarse de que su aliado Israel iba a atacar. Trump lo contradijo, afirmando que había actuado para evitar que Teherán lanzara un ataque primero.

Trump criticó a Sir Keir por negarse a unirse a los ataques contra Teherán el fin de semana y por no permitir inicialmente que Estados Unidos utilizara bases británicas para bombardear al régimen.

Advertisement

Posteriormente, el primer ministro Starmer cedió y autorizó a Estados Unidos a utilizar las bases “con fines defensivos”, mientras Irán disparaba misiles y drones por toda la región.

Cuando la líder conservadora Kemi Badenoch le preguntó en la sesión de preguntas al primer ministro por qué no autorizaba a la RAF a emprender “acciones ofensivas” contra Irán, Sir Keir respondió: «Lo que no estaba dispuesto a hacer el sábado era que el Reino Unido se uniera a una guerra, a menos que estuviera convencido de que existía una base legal y un plan viable y bien meditado. Esa sigue siendo mi postura».

Otra visión de la relación especial

Advertisement

Sir Keir ha sido acusado por importantes políticos conservadores y reformistas de poner en peligro la relación especial de Gran Bretaña con Estados Unidos.

Sin embargo, el primer ministro declaró: «Aviones británicos están derribando drones y misiles para proteger vidas estadounidenses en Oriente Medio desde nuestras bases conjuntas. Esa es la relación especial en acción. Compartir inteligencia a diario para mantener a nuestra gente a salvo. Esa es la relación especial en acción»..

«Aferrarse a las últimas palabras del presidente Trump no es la relación especial en acción», contraatacó Starmer ante los insultos del presidente norteamericano.

Advertisement

Afirmó que las acciones defensivas conjuntas adoptadas por Estados Unidos y el Reino Unido en los últimos días demuestran que la relación especial funciona.

Sorprendentemente, esta ha sido la única referencia a las críticas de Donald Trump al primer ministro en las preguntas al primer ministro de este miércoles.

Trump y el reino: «No estamos tratando con Winston Churchill»

Advertisement

Donald Trump afirmó estar «indiferente» con el Reino Unido. Dijo que «no estamos tratando con Winston Churchill», después de que Starmer tardara días en decidir si los aviones estadounidenses podían llevar a cabo ataques desde la «estúpida isla» de Diego García.

El último ataque espontáneo de Trump desde el Despacho Oval se produjo mientras Downing St enfrentaba críticas por esperar hasta la tarde del martes para dar el visto bueno al envío de un buque de guerra de la Marina Real a proteger Chipre, después de que la base aérea británica RAF Akrotiri en la isla fuera alcanzada por un dron.

El HMS Dragon, un destructor Tipo 45 capaz de derribar misiles balísticos y drones, se dirigirá a la región con dos helicópteros Wildcat a bordo, ante la preocupación de que las tropas sean vulnerables a ataques. Tardará siete días en llegar.

Advertisement

El Reino Unido no tiene buques de la Marina Real Británica en Oriente Medio por primera vez en medio siglo.

“Esta estúpida isla”

Trump atacó a Starmer por bloquear el uso de la isla Diego García por parte de Estados Unidos en sus ataques iniciales contra Irán, considerándolos ilegales.

Advertisement

El Reino Unido decidió separar el archipiélago de Chagos de Mauricio en 1965, cuando Mauricio aún era una colonia británica.

Aunque Mauricio obtuvo su independencia en 1968, las Islas Chagos permanecieron bajo control británico como parte del Territorio Británico del Océano Índico.

Durante los años 60 y 70, el Reino Unido expulsó a la población chagosiana para permitir el establecimiento de una base militar estadounidense en la isla de Diego García.

Advertisement

Tras décadas de disputa, el Reino Unido firmó un acuerdo para transferir la soberanía del archipiélago de Chagos a Mauricio, aunque la base militar de Diego García continuará operando bajo control del Reino Unido y Estados Unidos

“Esa estúpida isla… Nos ha llevado tres o cuatro días decidir dónde podemos aterrizar. Habría sido mucho más cómodo aterrizar allí que volar muchas horas extra. Así que estamos muy sorprendidos. No estamos tratando con Winston Churchill”, insistió.

“Diré que el Reino Unido ha sido muy, muy poco cooperativo con esa estúpida isla que tienen, que cedieron y aceptaron en arrendamiento por 100 años. Tiene que ver, quizás, con pueblos indígenas que reclaman la isla sin haberla visto antes. ¿De qué se trata todo esto? Han arruinado relaciones”, dijo Trump.

Advertisement

Trump afirmó que amaba al Reino Unido porque su madre nació allí, pero volvió a criticar la estrategia británica en materia de energía y migración.

“El Reino Unido, lo que está haciendo con la energía y lo que está haciendo con la inmigración es horrible”, dijo. “Tienen molinos de viento por todas partes que están arruinando el país, arruinando los paisajes, arruinando los hermosos campos. ¡Que se abra el Mar del Norte!”, exigió el presidente norteamericano.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

The future of war? US-Israel blitz on Iran unveils next-gen allied combat

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A massive joint air campaign by the United States and Israel is dismantling Iran’s missile network in what officials and analysts describe as one of the most coordinated allied operations in modern warfare.

Advertisement

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said the campaign is rapidly establishing dominance over Iranian skies. 

«Starting last night and to be completed in a few days … the two most powerful air forces in the world will have complete control of Iranian skies,» Hegseth said Wednesday. «Uncontested airspace.» 

«We will fly all day, all night … flying over Tehran, flying over Iran, flying over their capital… Iranian leaders are looking up and seeing only U.S. and Israeli air power every minute of every day until we decide it’s over.»

Advertisement

U.S. Central Command released footage showing strikes on Iranian mobile missile launchers. (@CENTCOM via X)

Israel Defense Forces spokesperson Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin told Fox News Digital in an exclusive interview Tuesday that «the cooperation between us and the American military is amazing. We have mutual planning and mutual executing for the plans in Iran and beyond.»

John Spencer, executive director of the Urban Warfare Institute, told Fox News Digital Israel effectively matched the U.S. military’s opening airpower surge. 

Advertisement

«Israel matched the United States in the number of aircraft in the air,» Spencer said. «For Israel, that represents roughly 80% of its air force capability.»

He added that the level of coordination between Washington and Jerusalem represents a new model for allied warfare. 

«This isn’t separate work,» Spencer said. «This is combined work. Integrated, synchronized operations combining powers.» 

Advertisement

«In the past we’ve had coalitions of dozens of countries,» Spencer said. «But having a partner that is both willing and capable of bringing immense capabilities like this is very rare.»

Largest Israeli air operation in history

The Israeli campaign, known as Operation Roaring Lion, began with roughly 200 fighter jets launching the largest coordinated air operation in the history of the Israeli Air Force. 

Within the first 24 hours of the campaign, Israeli fighter jets already had opened a corridor allowing sustained operations over Tehran, according to the Israeli military.

Advertisement

Israeli aircraft struck missile launch sites and air defense systems across western and central Iran in an opening wave targeting hundreds of sites simultaneously using intelligence gathered by Israel’s Intelligence Directorate and the CIA.

In the joint operation, Israeli aircraft dropped hundreds of munitions on approximately 500 targets, including missile launchers, command centers and air defense batteries.

The opening strike achieved a level of surprise rarely seen in modern warfare, according to Israeli intelligence chief Maj. Gen. Shlomi Binder. 

Advertisement

«In 40 seconds, we eliminated more than 40 of the most important people in Iran,» Binder said, referring to senior regime and military officials, including Iran Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. «We are sending a clear message to our enemies — there is no place where we will not find them.»

IRAN’S SENIOR CLERICS ‘EXPOSED’ AFTER BUILDING STRIKE IN QOM, SUCCESSION CHOICE LOOMS

IDF fighter jet taking off

An Israeli fighter jet taking off to launched airstrikes against the Houthis in Yemen.  (IDF)

Spencer said the strategy behind the opening strike represents a dramatic shift in modern warfare. 

Advertisement

«What Israel did in this opening campaign just wasn’t imaginable in the history of war. It never happened,» he said. «To start off by cutting off the brain… usually you target the military first. Here they targeted the political and military leadership and had the ability to wipe them out in a matter of hours.»

Spencer, a veteran of the 2003 Iraq War, said the operation reflects advances in intelligence and strike capabilities. 

«I was part of the invasion in 2003,» he said. «Something like this was unthinkable even 20 years ago.»

Advertisement

Massive strike campaign

An IDF spokesperson announced Wednesday what he described as a historic milestone: an Israeli Air Force F-35 fighter jet shot down an Iranian aircraft, marking the first time anywhere in the world that an F-35 has downed a manned aircraft and the first time in 40 years that an Israeli aircraft has shot down an enemy aircraft in combat.

Since the start of the operation, Israeli aircraft have carried out more than 1,600 sorties and deployed more than 5,000 munitions, according to figures released Wednesday.

The strikes have destroyed roughly 300 missile launchers and targeted more than 600 Iranian military infrastructure sites, according to the IDF.

Advertisement

ISRAEL STRIKES IRANIAN LEADERSHIP MEETING CHOOSING KHAMENEI SUCCESSOR

Tel Aviv flyover

United States Air Force aircraft in a flyover to commemorate Israel’s 75th Independence Day in May, 2023. (IDF Press Office)

Destroying Iran’s missile threat

Israeli intelligence assessments before the operation indicated Iran was accelerating its ballistic missile production with plans to reach 8,000 missiles by 2027. At the start of the campaign, Israel estimated Iran possessed roughly 3,000 missiles.

The strikes already have prevented the production of at least 1,500 ballistic missiles while destroying hundreds already in Iran’s arsenal, according to the IDF. 

Advertisement

Israeli officials say the missile program represented a direct threat not only to Israel but also to American forces and allies in the region. 

«The possession of missiles by a regime that openly declares its intent to destroy the State of Israel constitutes an existential threat,» the IDF said.

A group of men standing and looking at the rubble of a destroyed building.

A group of men inspects the ruins of a police station struck Monday amid the U.S.–Israeli military campaign in Tehran, Iran, Tuesday, March 3, 2026. (Vahid Salemi/AP Photo)

Casualties

Six U.S. service members have been killed, and several others injured, during Operation Epic Fury.

Advertisement

In Israel, 13 civilians had been killed as of Wednesday night and more than 1,000 injured in Iranian missile and drone attacks launched in response to the operation, according to Israeli emergency services. The United Arab Emirates has reported three deaths and 68 injuries since the war started

Precise casualty figures in Iran remain difficult to verify. Media reports say dozens of senior Iranian commanders were killed in the opening phase of the campaign, along with additional military personnel and civilians following strikes on military facilities and infrastructure.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement
A firefighter spraying water on a burning car in a debris-filled street in Tel Aviv.

A firefighter attempts to extinguish a burning car at the site of a direct hit from an Iranian missile strike in Tel Aviv, Israel, Feb. 28, 2026. (Tomer Neuberg/AP Photo)

Fighting on multiple fronts

As the conflict expands beyond Iran, Israeli forces have struck more than 160 Hezbollah targets in southern Lebanon in recent days. To sustain the multifront campaign, Israel has mobilized approximately 110,000 reservists.

«Wars are contests of will,» Spencer said. «Iran’s strategy is to break the will of the United States and Israel to continue the operation. The question is whether they can endure the pressure long enough to make that happen.»

Advertisement

Related Article

Netanyahu insists US and Israel's strikes on Iran won't lead to 'endless war'



war with iran,israel,military,iran,ali khamenei

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

‘Blankies,’ ICE tactics, and luxury jets: Top moments from Noem’s House testimony

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem forcefully defended her department’s immigration enforcement policies Wednesday before Democratic lawmakers — part of a heated and contentious House Oversight Committee hearing that, at times, grew deeply personal.

Advertisement

The hearing is the second in back-to-back DHS oversight hearings centered on the agency’s actions on immigration enforcement and Noem’s leadership of the department, and comes as members of Congress remain deadlocked on how to proceed with fully funding the sprawling federal agency.

Here are the top moments from the action-packed hearing. 

Dems home in on Lewandowski, ‘blankies,’ and luxury jets 

Some Democrats on the panel zeroed in on the responsibilities Corey Lewandowski has assumed as a special adviser for the Department of Homeland Security. Rep. Sydney Kalmager-Dove, D-Calif., cited a Wall Street Journal report from last month, that said Trump allegedly rejected Lewandowski’s request to be Noem’s chief of staff «due to reports of a romantic relationship» between the two.

Advertisement

Both Noem and Lewandowski have denied reports of an affair. 

Kalmager-Dove asked Noem, point-blank, about the nature of their relationship. «This person has no experience running anything close to the Department of Homeland Security, or even advising someone in your position,» Kalmager-Dove said, noting his role as a special government employee has extended a «well beyond the allowed 130-day» period. 

U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem takes her seat as she arrives to testify during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. (AFP via Getty)

Advertisement

«He is unqualified, which has left my constituents and I wondering why he is your top official,» she added. 
«So, Secretary Noem, at any time during your tenure as Director of Department of Homeland Security, have you had sexual relations with Corey Lewandowski?» 

Noem turned to address House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan briefly before responding. «Mr. Chairman, I am shocked that we’re going down and peddling tabloid garbage in this committee today,» she said. 

To Kalmager-Dove, she said: «Ma’am, one thing that I would tell you is that he is a special government employee who works for the White House. There are thousands of them in the federal government.»

Advertisement
Former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski arrives to meet with the House Intelligence Committee, about their ongoing probe of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S. January 17, 2018. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst - RC1BC76792D0

Corey Lewandowski is seen before a House Intelligence Committee hearing.  (Reuters/Jonathan Ernst)

Raskin says Noem is ‘flying too close to the sun’

The panel’s ranking Democrat, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., pressed Noem for details about Lewandowski’s role at DHS, though in the context of the question of DHS’s use of so-called «luxury jets.» Noem had defended use of the jets one day prior during Senate testimony, noting they were used for both executive travel and mass deportations.

Raskin said Wednesday that he had nearly been prepared to buy that story. «And then I heard about an airborne episode of entitlement, arrogance and contempt that I could hardly believe.»

«Apparently, when your special blanket — your blankie — was left on one of the government jets and not transported over the new one, your special government employee, Corey Lewandowski, chivalrous, stepped forward to fire the pilot, mid-air,» Raskin said.

Advertisement

«A 2003 Coast Guard Academy graduate and distinguished U.S. Coast Guard commanded … [who then] had to be rehired immediately because there was no one else who could fly the two of you on the rest of the journey back home,» Raskin said. «Secretary Noem, you’re flying high now, maybe even a little bit too close to the sun.»

The exchanges were markedly tense, largely due to the presence of Noem’s husband, who was sitting in the gallery for the duration of the hearing. 

DHS SECRETARY KRISTI NOEM ADDRESSES CALLS FOR HER FIRING, NEW ALEX PRETTI VIDEO

Advertisement
DHS Secretary Kristi Noem testifies before members of the Senate Judiciary Committee amid an ongoing agency shutdown and scrutiny over recent immigration enforcement actions.

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee. (Getty Images)

Swalwell, Noem showdown

Later in the hearing, Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., confronted Noem about the case of Miguel Lopez, a migrant who had been living illegally in the U.S. for some 30 years prior to his deportation last year. Lopez is married to a U.S. resident. «I went and saw Miguel in Mexico,» Swalwell told Noem. «He doesn’t have a job … and it’s hard for him to communicate» after being away from his home country for roughly three decades.

Noemi interjected: «Did he have a criminal record?»

Swalwell acknowledged that Lopez had pleaded guilty to a «lesser nonviolent charge» in 1995, but asked Noem to recognize «the pain» caused by the administration’s broader deportation policy. 

Advertisement

«The pain?» Noem responded. «And I wish people would do things correctly. If they’re not in legal status in this country, they can return home. We will pay for them to return home.» 

As for Miguel, she said, «I hope he got the $2,600 he could have» by choosing to self-deport. 

Officers restrain a demonstrator during an arrest outside a federal immigration facility amid a protest.

Federal agents forcibly detain an anti-ICE protester outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement building on Oct. 12, 2025, in Portland, Oregon. (Mathieu Lewis-Rolland/Getty)

‘Worst of the Worst’ 

The sharpest exchange came when Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., pressed Noem on the Trump administration’s repeated pledge to target «the worst of the worst» offenders in its removal efforts.

Advertisement

«Tell me about the worst of the worst,» Cohen said.

Noem fired back: «The worst of the worst served. I think you’ve offended the families behind me today with that.»

GOP STATES MOVE TO MAKE CHURCH SERVICE DISRUPTIONS A FELONY AFTER MINNESOTA STORMING

Advertisement
Kristi Noem

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, left, and White House border czar Tom Homan speak with reporters at the White House, Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2025, in Washington.  (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Cohen responded that he did not intend to offend anyone and said it was wrong for Noem to suggest he had. But Noem doubled down, arguing that critics were downplaying the consequences of illegal immigration.

«I was commenting on the fact that the individuals aren’t violent offenders, and you keep talking about the fact that these individuals that are in this country illegally don’t harm families,» she said.

Cohen noted that undocumented immigrants are statistically «less likely» than people born in the U.S. to commit crimes.

Advertisement

Noem then gestured to family members seated behind her, invoking stories of children lost to fentanyl overdoses and fatal car crashes involving undocumented drivers.

«The vast majority of these people behind me lost their children due to drugs, overdoses from drugs that came over the southern border,» Noem said. «They died from their kids being hit, accidents on the roads that illegal drivers were driving.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Cohen acknowledged the tragedies but argued they did not address his broader point. «All that’s true and given it’s true,» he said. «But you say you’re only going after the worst of the worst, and you’re not.»

Related Article

'You should be ashamed!': Protester dragged from Kristi Noem's Senate hearing

donald trump,politics,immigration,house of representatives politics,national security,democrats,blue city crime,republicans,federal courts

Continue Reading

Tendencias