INTERNACIONAL
The agency staff Vought might recommend cutting and whether the cuts will be permanent
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) chief Russell Vought and President Donald Trump are in the midst of mapping out cuts to the federal government after lawmakers on Capitol Hill failed to reach a funding bill agreement early Wednesday morning.
Trump set the stage in the lead-up to the shutdown that the federal government is likely to see staffing and program cuts during the shutdown, adding in a message Thursday to Truth Social that many federal agencies are a «political SCAM.»
«I have a meeting today with Russ Vought, he of PROJECT 2025 Fame, to determine which of the many Democrat Agencies, most of which are a political SCAM, he recommends to be cut, and whether or not those cuts will be temporary or permanent,» Trump posted.
HERE’S WHAT TRUMP WANTS TO DO TO RESHAPE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DURING THE SHUTDOWN
«I can’t believe the Radical Left Democrats gave me this unprecedented opportunity. They are not stupid people, so maybe this is their way of wanting to, quietly and quickly, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!»
Office of Management and Budget chief Russell Vought and President Donald Trump are in the midst of mapping out cuts to the federal government after lawmakers on Capitol Hill failed to reach a funding bill agreement. (Alex Brandon/The Associated Press )
Fox News Digital spoke with Richard Stern, the Heritage Foundation’s director of the Grover M. Hermann Center for the Federal Budget, Thursday morning to discuss which agencies the OMB chief would likely target for staffing cuts and if such cuts would be permanent.
How a shutdown enables cuts
Stern explained to Fox Digital that there are a pair of overlapping issues that lead to the government’s staffing size. Agencies are required by various laws to provide certain services to citizens. And, separately, appropriation bills set funding floors on how much money an agency has available to spend on staff payroll.
During a shutdown, however, there is a lapse in funding, meaning agencies do not have «payroll floors from the funding bill,» leaving the executive branch with discretion on how to continue providing required services to citizens, he explained.
«Because the funding bills set effective floors per salary spending, that tends to dictate how many people work for the agencies. In the event of a shutdown, the only requirement on the administration is to ensure that the agencies provide the services and whatnot that are required by law. But those laws don’t say you need, you know, 100 staffers to write a grant or only one staffer,» Stern told Fox Digital in a phone interview.
WHITE HOUSE PREPARES FOR ‘IMMINENT’ FEDERAL LAYOFFS AFTER DEMOCRATS FORCE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN
«They simply say, you know, ‘There’s a grant program that has to go out the door under XYZ parameters.’ So, in the event of a lapse in funding, it means that the administration … can lay out a plan saying, ‘Hey, look, you know, we think the Department of Education, for example, could do everything it is legally required to do, but do it with 10% of the workforce,’» he continued.
If the administration determines that an agency can fulfill its legally required services to citizens with fewer people, it will subsequently send reduction in force notices, known as RIFs, to staffers. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)
If the administration determines that an agency can fulfill its legally required services to citizens with fewer people, it will subsequently send reduction in force notices, known as RIFs, to staffers.
«If the funding was there, and if the funding law required those staff levels, then you wouldn’t be able to RIF,» he said. «But in the lapse of funding, it gives the White House that opportunity.»
Permanent changes to the government are in a gray zone, however, because RIFs would not be able to take effect until after 60 days.
«Once the RIF notices go out, you … legally need to wait 60 days before the RIF notices can be enacted,» Stern continued. «Really the shutdown would have to last 60 days, beyond that, to actually act on the RIFs.»
The Heritage Foundation expert, who also serves as the conservative think tank’s acting director of the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies, stressed that any staffing cuts are not an example of government «downsizing.»
TRUMP’S WHITE HOUSE DEMANDS AGENCIES MAP OUT MASS LAYOFFS AHEAD OF POTENTIAL SHUTDOWN
«It’s not downsizing the activities of agencies,» he said. «It’s not reducing what they make available, what services they provide. It’s simply reducing the workforce that’s providing the same level and the same amount of services.»
Environmental Protection Agency headquarters in Washington, D.C. (Getty)
What agencies could be targeted for cuts?
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told a gaggle of reporters Thursday that «thousands» of federal employees could be laid off during the shutdown.
«Look, it’s likely going to be in the thousands. It’s a very good question. And that’s something that the Office of Management and Budget and the entire team at the White House here, again, is unfortunately having to work on today,» Leavitt said.
Stern pointed to a handful of agencies that will likely be targeted for layoffs, citing agencies that have «mission creeped» their original purview into regulatory issues, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as other agencies, like the National Science Foundation, that handle grant writing for programs.
«Probably the Department of Ed is, is kind of the poster child on this one,» he said. «They’ve been talking about, they quite literally only need 10% or so on the staff.»
He also noted the EPA, Department of the Interior and the Department of Labor could face cuts due to the various agencies’ «mission creep into a lot of regulations that are quite harmful to the economy, that are quite harmful to just American families.»
WHITE HOUSE TELLS FEDERAL AGENCIES TO PREPARE LAYOFF PLANS AS GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN LOOMS
«EPA over … a decade or so, has mission creeped its jurisdiction into more and more regulatory affairs, that just simply the EPA doesn’t have under a statutory capacity,» he said. «They’re regulating outside of the confines, the charge they were given by law, by Congress. So, EPA is another one of those where that makes a lot of sense to cut a lot of the workforce there. Then, at HUD and Department of Labor you have similar things.»
Stern said the administration likely is also eyeing agencies such as the National Science Foundation, National Endowment for the Arts and Humanities and certain aspects of the Department of Housing and Urban Development that are charged with «running programs that write grants where there’s an enormous amount of legal discretion on who gets the grant money.»
President Donald Trump said the shutdown presented the opportunity for the administration to carry out layoffs as part of a continued mission to slim down the federal government. (Alex Brandon/The Associated Press )
«These grants are not serving some critical, or frankly, constitutional role,» he said, adding the grants often land in the hands of universities and promote «left-wing» ideology on topics, such as transgenderism and climate change.
What has Trump said on federal cuts?
Trump said during various public remarks Tuesday, as the deadline clock began to run dry, the shutdown presented him with the opportunity for the administration to carry out layoffs as part of a continued mission to slim down the federal government and snuff out overspending and fraud. Trump, however, repeatedly has stressed he does not support the shutdown, pinning blame on Democrats.
WHITE HOUSE PREPARES FOR ‘IMMINENT’ FEDERAL LAYOFFS AFTER DEMOCRATS FORCE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN
«We don’t want it to shut down because we have the greatest period of time ever,» Trump said from the Oval Office Tuesday. «I tell you, we have $17 trillion being invested. So, the last person that wants it shut down is us.
«Now, with that being said, we can do things during the shutdown that are irreversible, that are bad for them and irreversible by them, like cutting vast numbers of people out, cutting things that they like, cutting programs that they like,» he continued.
Republicans have pinned the shutdown blame on Democrats, arguing they refused to fund the budget as an attempt to reinstate taxpayer-funded medical benefits for illegal immigrants. Democrats have countered that claim as a «lie» and cast blame for the shutdown on Republicans.
«A lot of good can come down from shutdowns,» Trump added Tuesday. «We can get rid of a lot of things that we didn’t want, and they’d be Democrat things. But they want open borders. They want men playing in women’s sports. They want transgender for everybody. They never stop. They don’t learn. We won an election in a landslide.»
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Trump’s second administration has spotlighted the size of the federal government as bloated since Inauguration Day, including the president launching the Department of Government Efficiency to weed out potential fraud, overspending and corruption and offering federal employees voluntary buyouts in January to leave their posts before rolling out other RIF initiatives across various agencies.
Fox News Digital reached out to OMB’s office for comment on the anticipated cuts but did not immediately receive a reply.
Fox News Digital’s Elizabeth Elkind and Anders Hagstrom contributed to this report.
donald trump,budgets,white house,government shutdown
INTERNACIONAL
350 atletas salvadoreños competirán en el Ironman 70.3, el evento internacional más grande del año
El Ironman 70.3, que se celebrará en el lago de Ilopango este fin de semana, contará con la participación de 350 atletas salvadoreños, dentro de un total de casi 1,200 inscritos. La cifra fue confirmada por Pablo Sáenz, presidente de Latam Sports, durante la entrevista AM de Canal 10. El evento ha congregado atletas de diversas partes del mundo y se prevé el ingreso de cientos de turistas a raíz de esta competencia internacional.
“Están inscritos casi 1,200 atletas, de los cuales 350 son salvadoreños”, dijo Sáenz. El resto de los competidores proviene de diferentes puntos de Centroamérica, China, Europa y Sudamérica, lo que convierte a la competencia en una de las más diversas y con mayor proyección internacional para El Salvador en 2026.
El evento representa la primera vez que la franquicia Ironman 70.3 escoge como sede al país centroamericano. La competencia está diseñada para mostrar la capacidad organizativa y el atractivo turístico de El Salvador, además de impulsar el turismo deportivo. La presidenta del Instituto Salvadoreño de Turismo (Istu), Eny Aguiñada, que también estuvo como invitada en el mismo espacio de entrevista, afirmó que la selección del lago de Ilopango para la primera etapa de natación refleja el compromiso con el desarrollo de eventos de talla internacional y la estrategia de posicionamiento impulsada desde el gobierno.
La organización del Ironman 70.3 en El Salvador requirió un proceso complejo de postulación y preparación. Pablo Sáenz explicó que la iniciativa surgió tras constatar el potencial del país: “Escogimos este como un potencial lugar para hacer este evento. Fuimos y tocamos las puertas al gobierno, Eny y la ministra (de Turismo, Morena Valdez) nos recibieron después de varios intentos. Aquí estamos hoy y estamos muy felices. Hemos recibido un gran apoyo del gobierno. Estamos apuntando todos para el mismo camino, que es hacer grande a este país, El Salvador, ponerlo en el mapa mundial como corresponde y mostrar su belleza al mundo”, declaró Sáenz.
Entre los requisitos para albergar la competencia, Latam Sports priorizó la seguridad, la calidad de la infraestructura y la conexión vial. El propio Sáenz subrayó que San Salvador dispone de las condiciones óptimas para recibir tanto a los atletas como a los visitantes extranjeros: “La infraestructura está perfecta para abastecer a todos los atletas, sus acompañantes y todos los turistas que vengan”. puntualizó.
En conferencia de prensa, la ministra de Turismo aseguró hoy que esperan el ingreso de más de 4,000 visitantes para este evento, que ha generado fuerte expectativa entre los salvadoreños.
La prueba comenzará en el lago de Ilopango, donde los participantes deberán completar la etapa de natación en aguas tranquilas, con corrientes mínimas y visibilidad clara de las boyas a lo largo del recorrido. En la entrevista de Canal 10, Sáenz describió el entorno: “Es un lago profundo en la parte a 750 metros desde la orilla. Es profundo, poca turbulencia. Los nadadores van a tener una natación satisfactoria. Lo bueno de nadar en un lago como este, que el agua no se mueve, es que las boyas se ven desde cualquier punto. La navegación va a ser muy sencilla”.
Tras la natación, los atletas recorrerán 90 kilómetros en bicicleta sobre la carretera Panamericana, en una ruta que alterna subidas exigentes en la salida de Apulo y tramos de descensos rápidos. La etapa de ciclismo fue calificada por la organización como de dificultad media. El evento culminará con 21 kilómetros de carrera pedestre en el Centro Histórico de San Salvador, un circuito que resalta la renovación urbana y la transformación de la ciudad en los últimos años.
En cuanto al impacto económico, la presidenta del Istu anticipó que el Ministerio de Turismo presentará cifras oficiales después del evento, aunque ya se prevé un efecto positivo debido al arribo de atletas, familias y equipos de apoyo. La logística ha involucrado la coordinación de diferentes carteras de Estado, desde el Ministerio de Obras Públicas hasta el Ministerio de Salud, además de la articulación con el sector privado para garantizar la calidad de los servicios turísticos.
La competencia de Ironman 70.3 no contará en esta edición inaugural con categoría profesional. Pablo Sáenz explicó que la licencia para este primer año exige realizar una edición piloto solo con atletas amateurs, aunque se espera una disputa reñida por el primer lugar de la clasificación general.
Las autoridades locales han solicitado a los habitantes de San Salvador y zonas aledañas que consulten los canales oficiales del gobierno para conocer los cierres viales y las rutas alternas durante la realización del evento. Además, invitaron a la población a sumarse como espectadores y a brindar su apoyo a los atletas nacionales.
corresponsal:Desde San Salvador, El Salvador
INTERNACIONAL
Democrats cheer Supreme Court move blocking Trump tariffs — despite past support for trade duties
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Democrats quickly applauded the Supreme Court’s decision Friday blocking President Donald Trump’s tariff strategy, calling the duties an unfair tax on Americans, even as some in the party have previously supported using tariffs as leverage in trade disputes.
«The Supreme Court decision striking down the harmful Trump tariffs is a big victory for the American people. And another crushing defeat for the wannabe king,» House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said in a statement.
«Trump’s illegal tariff tax just collapsed. He tried to govern by decree and stuck families with the bill. Enough chaos. End the trade war,» Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in an X post of his own.
TRUMP SAYS TARIFFS CRITICAL TO NATIONAL SECURITY AS SUPREME COURT PREPARES LANDMARK DECISION
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., left, pictured alongside House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., right, at a press conference in January 2026. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
The Supreme Court ruled that Trump lacks power to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a law that gives presidents powers to «regulate» transactions with foreign entities in response to «unusual and extraordinary threats.»
The Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that the law falls short of including tariff powers.
Yet several prominent Democrats have previously supported tariffs when wielded for their own policy goals.
Despite condemning Trump’s use of IEEPA in his second term, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., once urged Congress on the House floor to use tariffs to push back on China’s growing market power.
«In terms of tariffs, it’s interesting to note that the average U.S. MFN [Most Favored Nation] tariff on Chinese goods coming into the United States is 2%, whereas the average MFN tariff on U.S. goods going into China is 35%,» Pelosi said, referring to tariffs China had imposed on the U.S.
Further, former President Joe Biden largely left Trump’s first-term tariffs against China in place with little resistance from Democrats, who controlled both chambers of Congress at the time.
Trump, in his second term, has used tariffs as a point of leverage against other countries, threatening steeper trade costs with countries that didn’t see eye-to-eye with the goals of his administration.
6 HOUSE REPUBLICANS DEFY TRUMP ON KEY AGENDA ITEM IN DEM-PUSHED VOTE
President Donald Trump displays a signed executive order imposing tariffs on imported goods during a «Make America Wealthy Again» trade announcement event in the White House Rose Garden April 2, 2025. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
Trump argued his policies would enable the country to bring in more revenue while also achieving more of its goals abroad.
According to data provided by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Trump’s tariffs brought in $30.4 billion in January alone. Over the past fiscal year, the Treasury indicated the tariffs had raked in $124 billion.
At least one House Republican argued that Democrats’ celebration was ironic given their opposition to tax breaks included in the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act.
«It is interesting how Democrats are upset that foreigners are being taxed yet they are promoting tax increases across the board, and they never reduced taxes on overtime, tips, or Social Security when they were in power in 2021 and 2022,» the House GOP lawmaker said. «If they truly believed in fair trade, they would’ve pushed harder on the Chinese especially, but they clearly failed to do so.»
That past and present political reality did little to slow the good times from rolling for several congressional Democrats on Friday.
Rep. Brendan Boyle, D-Pa., the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, praised the Supreme Court’s decision, framing tariffs as an illegitimate way to increase the country’s revenue.
«This ruling is a victory for every American family paying higher prices because of Trump’s tariff taxes. The Supreme Court rejected Trump’s attempt to impose what amounted to a national sales tax on hardworking Americans,» Boyle said in a statement.
Rep. Don Beyer, D-Va., the chairman of the New Democrat Coalition on Trade & Tariffs Task Force, echoed Boyle’s thinking.
THE ECONOMIC POLICIES SHAPING TRUMP’S RETURN TO THE WHITE HOUSE
A view of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 9, 2026. (Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)
«[Trump] has repeatedly disregarded the Constitution to unilaterally impose sweeping tariffs without credible reason or cause, crushing American consumers and small businesses under these new taxes to help pay for giveaways to his wealthy friends. Now, at last, the Supreme Court has ruled that he broke the law to do so,» Beyer said.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., said the court had sided with the longstanding criticisms from Democrats over concerns about Trump’s unilateral powers on tariffs.
«GOOD NEWS: The Supreme Court just ruled that Trump’s tariffs imposed under his ‘emergency authorities’ are unlawful. They affirmed what we’ve been saying this whole time: Only Congress has the power to impose taxes, which includes Trump’s reckless tariffs,» Jayapal said in a post to social media.
Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment.
congress,donald trump,economy,supreme court,politics
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The frightening moment an avalanche thundered down a mountainside and slammed into a train traveling through the Swiss Alps was captured by a tourist.
The dramatic incident unfolded on Feb. 17 near the popular ski resort town of Zermatt in southern Switzerland’s Valais canton.
Kirsten Osborne, an Australian woman living in the U.K., was on the train with other passengers when the avalanche suddenly struck, according to Storyful.
She filmed the shocking moment a massive wall of snow barreled down the mountain toward the train.
9 CALIFORNIA SKIERS STILL MISSING AFTER AVALANCHE; 6 RESCUED
A train was struck by an avalanche near Zermatt ski resort in Switzerland’s Valais canton. (Kirsten Osborne/Storyful)
In the video, a child can be heard saying «uh-oh!» several times as the growing wave of powdery snow rapidly approaches.
Within seconds, the train is engulfed in a thick white cloud as the avalanche crashes into it and covers the window in snow, causing the train to shake.
Osborne described how passengers were left stranded for around two hours following the impact.
«We were stuck for two hours before the rescue and provided bus transport to safety,» she said.
UELI KESTENHOLZ, WHO WON SNOWBOARDING’S FIRST OLYMPIC MEDAL IN 1998, DIES IN SWISS AVALANCHE
Kirsten Osborne, an Australian woman living in the U.K., was onboard the train when the avalanche struck. (Kirsten Osborne/Storyful)
Despite the terrifying scenes, no injuries were reported.
Matterhorn Gotthard Bahn, the rail company that operates the route, has since confirmed that all passengers were safely evacuated in coordination with emergency services.
«At around 11 a.m. on Tuesday morning, another avalanche occurred between Täsch and Randa,» the company said in a statement.
«A regional MGBahn train was struck by a resulting powder-snow avalanche. No one was injured. Passengers were evacuated in cooperation with the emergency services.
«As a precaution, and in consultation with external local natural hazard specialists, MGBahn has decided to suspend operations on the St. Niklaus–Täsch route until further notice,» the company said.
CALIFORNIA AVALANCHE THAT KILLED 8 IS DEADLIEST IN STATE HISTORY
The incident happened amid dangerous conditions in the Swiss Alps. (Jean-Christophe Bott/Keystone via AP, File)
MGBahn also confirmed it was in «close contact with specialists and experts to assess the situation along the entire route network between Disentis (GR) and Zermatt (VS).»
The incident happened amid dangerous winter conditions in the Swiss Alps, where heavy snowfall has impacted the tourist season.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The avalanche strike on the train came just a day after another rail incident near the town of Goppenstein, where a train derailed, injuring five people.
Local reports indicated that an avalanche may have been a possible cause of that derailment, although investigations are ongoing.
Large areas of the western Alps have been affected this season by avalanche risks, according to The Times.
europe,avalanche,resorts
Capuchetti citó a indagatoria al exdiputado kirchnerista Marcos Cleri, vinculado a la acusación contra Milman
Pía Slapka anunció su separación del empresario Daniel Gabrielli: “No estamos más juntos hace un tiempo”
El comunicado del Gobierno tras la explosión en la Escuela Superior de Gendarmería
Qué significa para la Argentina el fallo de la Corte Suprema de EEUU que frenó los aranceles de Trump
El nuevo DT del Tottenham habló del Cuti Romero: del recuerdo en la Juventus a los elogios y el respaldo total
350 atletas salvadoreños competirán en el Ironman 70.3, el evento internacional más grande del año
Reforma laboral bomba: menos indemnización, más horas y despidos más fáciles — el cambio que puede sacudir el empleo en Argentina
Cristian Ritondo: “Vamos a apoyar la ley de modernización laboral, pero no el régimen de licencias por enfermedad”
Ayuda Escolar Anual: a cuánto asciende, donde se tramita y quien puede cobrarla
El presidente de Camarco habló tras el mensaje de Caputo a los empresarios: “Apoyamos fervientemente la reforma laboral”
POLITICA3 días agoReforma laboral bomba: menos indemnización, más horas y despidos más fáciles — el cambio que puede sacudir el empleo en Argentina
- ECONOMIA2 días ago
Ayuda Escolar Anual: a cuánto asciende, donde se tramita y quien puede cobrarla
- POLITICA3 días ago
El Gobierno endurece las medidas de seguridad y control en la marcha prevista contra la reforma laboral en el Congreso
