Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Acquittal of man who urged violence against Trump puts First Amendment in spotlight

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The First Amendment won out this week in a court case over a man who had repeatedly called for President Donald Trump’s assassination and openly fantasized about his violent demise. 

Advertisement

A jury in Virginia acquitted the man, Peter Stinson, of one charge of soliciting a crime of violence, raising questions about when speech is protected by the Constitution and when it becomes incriminating.

A former longtime Coast Guard officer, Stinson had called for someone to «take the shot» in reference to Trump, according to court papers. «Realistically the only solution is violence,» Stinson wrote.

Stinson said he «would twist the knife after sliding it into [Trump’s] fatty flesh» and that he «would be willing to pitch in» for a hitman contract.

Advertisement

TED CRUZ SAYS HATE SPEECH ‘ABSOLUTELY’ PROTECTED BY FIRST AMENDMENT FOLLOWING CHARLIE KIRK’S ASSASSINATION

Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump is reflected in bulletproof glass as he finishes speaking at a campaign rally in Lititz, Pennsylvania, Sunday, Nov. 3, 2024. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

«He wants us dead. I can say the same thing about him,» Stinson wrote in another post during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Advertisement

A witness for the defense, Professor Jen Golbeck of the University of Maryland, said people «rooting for Trump to die online» is common.

«On one hand, I would not encourage anyone to post those thoughts on social media,» Golbeck said, according to the Washington Post. «On the other hand, I can’t count the number of people who I saw post similar things. . . . It’s a very common sentiment. There’s social media accounts dedicated to tracking whether Trump has died.»

Brennen VanderVeen, program counsel with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, said that one issue with the charges in Stinson’s case was that it was not clear whom Stinson was soliciting to carry out the crime.

Advertisement

«Solicitation is when it’s directly tied to the crime. So, if he contacts an actual hit man and tries to arrange some sort of hit contract, that’s solicitation,» VanderVeen told Fox News Digital. «Without more . . . that probably does not meet the elements of actual solicitation.»

Stinson’s attorneys argued in court documents that their client’s posts were not threats but rather «political advocacy that the First Amendment was squarely designed to protect.»

«They lack the ‘specificity, imminence, and likelihood of producing lawless action’ required to fall outside constitutional protection,» the attorneys said.

Advertisement

Threats to conservative SCOTUS justices and Obama

The jury acquittal, which was handed down quickly after a two-day trial in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, came at a time when political violence has taken the spotlight, particularly in the aftermath of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s assassination and a string of recent violence toward immigration enforcement officers, and as Republican and Democratic political figures continuously face threats.

A person convicted of attempting to assassinate Justice Brett Kavanaugh had taken concrete steps by searching the internet for mass shootings, discussing killing a Supreme Court justice in internet chats and showing up armed at Kavanaugh’s house in 2022.

A man who participated in the Jan. 6 riot was convicted by a judge in a separate case of firearms charges and making a hoax threat aimed at former President Barack Obama. He was sentenced this week to time served after he livestreamed himself driving around the former president’s neighborhood and saying he was «working on a detonator.» He was found with a machete and illegal weapons.

Advertisement

In a looming constitutional test, another man is facing charges of threatening federal judges by sending hundreds of ominous messages through the Supreme Court website referencing several justices’ graphic murders. He tried to have his case tossed out over First Amendment concerns, but a judge denied the request, saying a jury would need to weigh that argument.

BONDI ‘HATE SPEECH’ REMARKS SPARK TORRENT OF CRITICISM FROM CONSERVATIVES

Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh

Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh watches as Taoiseach Micheal Martin speaks at a breakfast meeting in Washington, D.C., Wednesday, March 12, 2025. (Niall Carson/PA Images via Getty Images)

Presidents, senators, House lawmakers and members of the judiciary routinely speak about facing a range of threats, whether in public forums or through direct messages.

Advertisement

High court greenlights ‘vituperative’ language

One legal test in these cases came in 1969, when the Supreme Court decided in favor of a protester who allegedly had told a group of people while discussing getting drafted for the Vietnam War that if he was handed a rifle, the first man he wanted to kill was President Lyndon Johnson. His remark was political hyperbole rather than a «true threat,» the high court found.

«What is a threat must be distinguished from what is constitutionally protected speech,» the majority wrote. «The language of the political arena . . . is often vituperative, abusive, and inexact.»

Stinson was initially charged with two counts of a threat against the president, but the DOJ shifted course and brought the one solicitation charge against him.

Advertisement

DOJ lawyers argued that Stinson’s incessant violent comments on X and Bluesky, coupled with self-identifying as an Antifa member, met the charging criteria, but prosecutors failed to convince a jury that the speech was more than bluster.

Kirk spurs examination of ‘hate speech’

In the case of Kirk’s murder, finger-pointing ensued. Republicans blamed inflammatory rhetoric from Kirk’s political opponents for inciting his death.

Attorney General Pam Bondi stirred the conversation by saying in an interview after Kirk’s death that the DOJ would «absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.» Bondi later walked back her comment, saying speech that «crosses the line into threats of violence» is punishable by law.

Advertisement
Attorney General Pam Bondi at a Senate hearing.

Attorney General Pam Bondi.  (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

In cases of inciting violence, according to VanderVeen, speech remains protected when there is a lacking a nexus between the words and the attack.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«Incitement is more about the imminence. . . . How much time would have to pass between that person’s speech and the actual unlawful act of the violence?» VanderVeen said, noting that inciting violence typically involves addressing a mob.

Advertisement

«If someone’s saying, ‘Violence is good,’ but there’s no imminent lawless action there, someone else has to say, ‘That guy’s right, that violence is good. I’m going to start doing violence,’» VanderVeen said. «At that point, that’s on the person doing the violence.»

judiciary,justice department,supreme court,donald trump,politics

INTERNACIONAL

Muchos venezolanos quieren volver a casa, pero no pueden obtener pasaportes

Published

on


Cuando Yoalbert González llevó a su madre a una cita de inmigración en diciembre, ella fue detenida y, semanas después, deportada a Venezuela, al igual que miles de otras personas de su país durante el segundo mandato del presidente Donald Trump.

González, de 34 años, repartidor en Fort Worth, Texas, que llegó a la frontera estadounidense en 2021 buscando asilo, estaba aterrorizado ante la posibilidad de correr la misma suerte y decidió abandonar el país voluntariamente.

Advertisement

Pero pronto descubrió que marcharse no era tan sencillo como reservar un vuelo.

A muchos venezolanos, entre ellos González, les confiscaron el pasaporte al entrar en Estados Unidos, en virtud de una política federal de larga data que acelera la deportación en caso de que se les niegue el asilo, lo que les impide volar a casa.

Las autoridades venezolanas exigen un pasaporte válido o un permiso de viaje emitido por el gobierno para ingresar al país en avión.

Advertisement

Este documento solo se puede obtener en Caracas, la capital de Venezuela, o en algunos consulados de Latinoamérica, los cuales se encuentran desbordados por este tipo de solicitudes.

Esto hace que reemplazar un pasaporte sea prácticamente imposible para muchos de los casi 700.000 venezolanos que han llegado a Estados Unidos desde 2019.

Si bien el gobierno estadounidense restableció recientemente las relaciones diplomáticas con Venezuela, la Embajada de Venezuela en Washington permanece cerrada al público y ningún consulado venezolano está abierto en Estados Unidos para emitir documentos de viaje.

Advertisement

El proceso para obtener un permiso de viaje también puede ser engorroso y costoso.

Un familiar directo debe solicitar el documento personalmente en Caracas y presentar ante las autoridades un itinerario de viaje y una carta que detalle los motivos del solicitante para regresar.

Riesgos

Advertisement

Algunos venezolanos desesperados se han arriesgado a viajar en embarcaciones peligrosamente sobrecargadas para llegar a Sudamérica, ya que no pueden viajar en avión.

Las autoridades panameñas afirman que más de 20.000 personas cruzaron sus aguas en barco durante el año transcurrido desde que Trump regresó al poder.

La gran mayoría eran venezolanos.

Advertisement

Una de las razones por las que los venezolanos dicen que abandonan Estados Unidos voluntariamente es su temor a ser deportados sin sus hijos, o a pasar largos períodos detenidos si son arrestados.

“Escuché que mucha gente acudía a sus citas y la retenían. Luego le pasó a mi madre. Fue muy frustrante y pensé que me podría pasar a mí”, dijo González, quien recibió autorización para vivir y trabajar en Estados Unidos mientras su caso de asilo estaba pendiente.

También se le concedió el Estatus de Protección Temporal (TPS, por sus siglas en inglés), otorgado a ciudadanos de países designados que atraviesan disturbios u otras condiciones adversas.

Advertisement

El año pasado, la administración Trump eliminó esta protección para más de medio millón de venezolanos, una medida que aún se encuentra en litigio, pero que, sin embargo, puso fin a este estatus para muchos.

Estados Unidos y Venezuela han estrechado sus relaciones tras la captura del presidente Nicolás Maduro por las fuerzas estadounidenses en enero.

Ahora, con el restablecimiento de relaciones diplomáticas entre Washington y Delcy Rodríguez, la líder interina de Venezuela, muchos venezolanos esperan que se solucione el problema de los desplazamientos.

Advertisement

Según Oliver Blanco, diplomático venezolano, la misión diplomática del país en Estados Unidos está nuevamente bajo su control y los funcionarios «comenzarán gradualmente a registrar a los venezolanos en Estados Unidos para identificar sus necesidades consulares y reanudar los servicios consulares tan pronto como las condiciones técnicas, operativas y logísticas lo permitan».

En un comunicado, el Departamento de Estado afirmó que la llegada de funcionarios venezolanos a Washington representaba un paso hacia el restablecimiento de las relaciones diplomáticas y consulares.

Sin embargo, los críticos afirman que Washington y Caracas no están actuando con la suficiente rapidez.

Advertisement

El Caucus Venezolano-Estadounidense, un grupo de defensa con sede en Miami, declaró que las incipientes relaciones diplomáticas deben ir más allá de los «gestos simbólicos» y que Venezuela debe reanudar de inmediato los servicios consulares básicos.

La vicepresidenta de Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, llega para tomar posesión como líder interina en Caracas, el lunes 5 de enero de 2026.  (Alejandro Cegarra/The New York Times)

Adam Isacson, experto en fronteras de la Oficina de Washington para América Latina (WOLA), un grupo de derechos humanos, dijo que la administración Trump, tras haber puesto en marcha una campaña contra la inmigración, debería estar interesada en facilitar los viajes de los venezolanos que desean regresar a su país.

“Sabemos que están sumamente ansiosos por lograr que los venezolanos se deporten voluntariamente”, dijo Isacson sobre los funcionarios de la administración Trump, “así que me sorprende que no hayan podido presionar al chavismo para que solucione esto”, agregó, refiriéndose al movimiento socialista fundado por el expresidente venezolano Hugo Chávez, y al que pertenece gran parte del partido gobernante, incluido el actual presidente.

Recurso

Advertisement

Desde mayo de 2025, las autoridades estadounidenses ofrecen pagar a los inmigrantes para que se autodeporten a través de la aplicación gubernamental CBP Home.

Si bien el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional ha afirmado que miles de personas han completado el proceso con éxito, muchos solicitantes venezolanos han reportado dificultades.

Jennifer Ibañez Whitlock, asesora principal de políticas del Centro Nacional de Leyes de Inmigración, dijo que la organización de defensa escuchó repetidamente que la aplicación «no funcionaba para los venezolanos», ya que requería que los solicitantes tuvieran un pasaporte válido para completar el proceso.

Advertisement

Al mismo tiempo, el gobierno venezolano ha puesto en marcha una campaña mediática para promover la repatriación de algunos de los aproximadamente 8 millones de personas que huyeron del país en el marco de una de las mayores crisis de desplazamiento de la historia reciente de América Latina.

Yelitza Pérez, una inmigrante venezolana de 29 años que llegó a Estados Unidos en 2022, dijo que había solicitado el programa CBP Home a principios de febrero, «pero no recibió respuesta».

En marzo, con la ayuda de su madre, obtuvo un documento de viaje en Caracas.

Advertisement

Sin embargo, al llegar al Aeropuerto Internacional de Miami, los agentes de la aerolínea no lo aceptaron, alegando que posiblemente fuera fraudulento.

Pérez quedó varada en el aeropuerto con sus dos hijos.

Blanco, el diplomático venezolano, afirmó que las autoridades del país «garantizarían el reconocimiento y la validez de los documentos de viaje» mediante la coordinación con los países vecinos y las aerolíneas.

Advertisement

Miler Angulo, de 32 años, cuyo pasaporte ha caducado y que perdió su estatus de Estatus de Protección Temporal (TPS) en noviembre, ha visto frustrados repetidamente sus planes de regresar a casa.

«Es como si dos paredes se cerraran a mi alrededor», dijo.

Angulo añadió que le aterraba tanto la posibilidad de ser detenida que solo salía de su apartamento en la ciudad de Nueva York para pasear a su perro y para ir a trabajar limpiando casas.

Advertisement

González, el repartidor de Fort Worth, también obtuvo un permiso de viaje a través de su tío y compró un boleto para regresar esta semana.

Su esposa e hijos llegaron a Venezuela y lo están esperando.

Llegó al Aeropuerto Internacional de Miami el miércoles por la tarde para un vuelo a las 7:30 de la mañana siguiente, pero no le permitieron facturar.

Advertisement

El agente de la puerta de embarque le dijo que debía llegar 24 horas antes para verificar su permiso de viaje.

Pagó una multa y esperaba que le permitieran abordar otro vuelo el viernes por la mañana.

“Este país nos abrió sus puertas, pero también se las cerró”, dijo.

Advertisement

“Lo único que deseo es estar ya con mi familia”.

c.2026 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

US allowing some Nigeria embassy staff to evacuate over ‘deteriorating security situation’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The State Department said it authorized the departure of some staff at its embassy in Nigeria over the «deteriorating security situation» in the African country. 

Advertisement

The development comes weeks after the U.S. military reportedly sent MQ-9 Reaper drones to Nigeria amid fears of a renewed insurgency by the terrorist group Boko Haram. The day before the authorization was issued, gunmen attacked two villages about 155 miles from Abuja, where the U.S. embassy is located, killing 20 people, residents told The Associated Press. 

«On April 8, 2026, the U.S. Department of State authorized the voluntary departure of non-emergency U.S. government employees and family members from U.S. Embassy Abuja due to the deteriorating security situation,» the U.S. Embassy and Consulate in Nigeria said. «The U.S. Embassy in Abuja will remain open but will have limited ability to provide emergency services to U.S. citizens in Nigeria.» 

«The U.S. Consulate General in Lagos will continue to provide routine and emergency services to U.S. citizens in Nigeria,» it added. «The Department of State Travel Advisory for Nigeria remains at Level 3, recommending travelers reconsider travel to Nigeria due to crime, terrorism, civil unrest, kidnapping, armed gangs, and inconsistent availability of health care services.»

Advertisement

GUNMEN ON BIKES STORM NIGERIA VILLAGE ON PALM SUNDAY, KILLING AT LEAST 20

Nigerian soldiers prepare to patrol in Maiduguri on March 18, 2026, following a deadly triple suicide bombing that killed 23 people on March 16. (Audu Marte/AFP/Getty Images)

The embassy also said, «U.S. citizens in Abuja should consider departing if you do not need to remain for emergency or essential purposes.» 

Advertisement

The recent attacks occurred in the early hours of Tuesday in Bagna and Erena, located in the Shiroro area of Niger state. 

«They came on motorbikes and began shooting. It was a surprise attack, because it was in the early hours of the morning,» Jibrin Isah, who lives in Erena, told the AP.

100 US TROOPS LAND IN NIGERIA AS ISLAMIC MILITANTS THREATEN WEST AFRICA REGIONAL SECURITY

Advertisement
Police officers gather at the scene of a gunmen attack in Gari Ya Waye community Jos North Nigeria

Police officers gather at the scene of Sunday night gunmen attack in the Gari Ya Waye community in Nigeria, Monday, March 30, 2026. (Samson Omale/AP)

Residents said at least 20 people were killed, with more missing. However, local police said only three people were killed. 

The State Department said in a travel advisory issued Wednesday that there is «risk of terrorist violence, including terrorist attacks and other activity in Nigeria,» adding, «Terrorists collaborate with local gangs to expand their reach» and «They may attack with little or no warning.» 

The MQ-9 drones reportedly were deployed to Nigeria in late March after 200 U.S. troops arrived in February to provide training and intelligence. Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, is battling a complex security crisis, especially in the north of the country.

Advertisement

A spokesperson for AFRICOM, the U.S. Africa Command, had told the AP that U.S. troops «are working alongside their Nigerian counterparts to provide intelligence support, advisory assistance, and targeted training in support of the Nigerian Armed Forces.»  

Among the most prominent Islamic militant groups active in Nigeria are Boko Haram and its breakaway faction, which is affiliated with the Islamic State and is known as Islamic State West Africa Province, or ISWAP.

US military MQ-9 Reaper drone approaching landing at Rafael Hernandez Airport in Aguadilla Puerto Rico

A U.S. military MQ-9 Reaper drone approaches for landing at Rafael Hernandez Airport in Aguadilla, Puerto Rico, on Dec. 29, 2025. (Miguel J. Rodriguez Carrillo/AFP)

There is also the ISIS-linked Lakurawa, as well as other «bandit» groups that specialize in kidnapping for ransom and illegal mining. 

Advertisement

President Donald Trump has spoken out against violence targeting Christians in Nigeria, telling Fox News Radio last year, «I’m really angry about it» and «What’s happening in Nigeria is a disgrace.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth also met with Nigerian national security advisor Nuhu Ribadu last November amid threats from Trump to cut off aid to Nigeria if the country «continues to allow the killing of Christians.» Nigerian officials have pushed back on the accusation.

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Anders Hagstrom and The Associated Press contributed to this report.   



warnings, counter terrorism, us, state department, military

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Dems dodge on Trump removal as party weighs 25th Amendment move

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

House Democrats are weighing a long-shot scenario to remove President Donald Trump using the 25th Amendment, but are declining to say whether they’ll act before the November midterm elections.

Advertisement

House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, D-Md., will brief congressional Democrats Friday afternoon on the constitutional mechanism that would rely heavily on Trump’s Cabinet agreeing to push him out of office.

The 25th Amendment has never been used before to involuntarily remove a president and is effectively moot without widespread Republican buy-in. But a bevy of House Democrats have embraced that scenario following the president’s escalating conflict with Iran.

«Donald Trump’s deranged threat to destroy ‘a whole civilization’ in Iran is a threat to commit war crimes and genocide,» Raskin wrote on social media Tuesday. «Republicans in Congress must prevail upon Vice President Vance, now campaigning for Putin’s puppet Viktor Orban in Hungary, to return to the U.S. and invoke Section 4 of the 25th Amendment.»

Advertisement

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., speaks to reporters outside House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office in Washington, D.C., on July 22, 2021, after meeting with members of the select committee investigating the January 6 insurrection. The committee is scheduled to hold its first hearing next week. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

MASSIE-LED PUSH TO HANDCUFF TRUMP ON IRAN GETS JEFFRIES’ BACKING

«The 25th Amendment should be invoked to spare our country and the world from his increasingly unhinged behavior,» Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., a member of the Judiciary Committee, also said Tuesday. 

Advertisement

Dozens of House Democrats have continued to press for the president’s ouster despite the announcement of a two-week ceasefire.

«All options should be on the table,» Rep. Sara Jacobs, D-Calif., said Thursday.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., has offered support for the briefing and ongoing discussions about the president’s removal, saying Democrats are considering a «range of accountability mechanisms.»

Advertisement

The lead Democrat, however, has remained ambiguous about his personal views despite signaling that all options remain on the table. That is largely in keeping with Jeffries’ efforts over the past year to keep the focus away from impeachment talk while leaning into policy fights over health care costs, tariffs and immigration enforcement. 

Fox News Digital reached out to members of House Democratic leadership, but did not receive a response before publication.

A spokesperson for the House Judiciary Committee declined to comment on the 25th Amendment briefing. 

Advertisement
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and House Minority Whip Katherine Clark standing on U.S. Capitol steps

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., and House Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., are seen before a rally with House Democrats on the steps of the U.S. Capitol to oppose the Senate passed spending bill that would reopen the government because it does not extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits, on Wednesday, November 12, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc)

LONGTIME TRUMP CRITIC REVEALS WHY SHE THINKS HIS IRAN ACTIONS ARE WRONG, WARNS IT’S A ‘MUCH BIGGER WAR’

Jeffries largely sidestepped a question Thursday regarding why Democrats are having conversations about removing Trump during a news conference in New York City.

«We have a responsibility as a separate and co-equal branch of government to defend the American people, and we want to be able to do it in an informed way,» Jeffries said before pivoting to criticizing Republicans over the cost of living.

Advertisement

«We’ve ruled nothing out and we’ve ruled nothing in,» Jeffries told MS Now when asked about whether he thought the 25th Amendment should be invoked.

In both appearances Jeffries did not acknowledge that Democrats, who are effectively powerless in Washington, lack the numbers to successfully push impeachment or constitutional mechanisms to oust Trump. 

President Donald Trump

U.S. President Donald Trump arrives to address the nation from the Cross Hall of the White House on April 1, 2026 in Washington, D.C. (Alex Brandon-Pool/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

In the 25th Amendment scenario, the power rests with Vice President JD Vance and Trump’s Cabinet, who would have to agree the president is unfit to serve. Assuming Trump were to challenge that decision, two-thirds of the House and Senate — meaning a significant number of Republicans in Congress — would have to vote in support of that judgment.

At present, Democrats also have a math problem when it comes to impeachment and conviction, which requires a two-thirds majority in the Senate. Congressional Democrats failed twice to convict Trump in his first term. 

midterm elections, republicans, congress, donald trump, democrats

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias

Copyright © 2025 NDM - Noticias del Momento | #Noticias #Chimentos #Política #Fútbol #Economía #Sociedad