Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Israel drills for surprise attack with massive military exercise as expert invokes 1973 war

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Israeli military launched large-scale domestic military exercises on Sunday to counter surprise border infiltrations and ground raids across northern and central Israel, mobilizing multiple divisions and air assets amid rising regional tensions.

Advertisement

The drills, set to continue over 48 hours, came as an Israeli security expert invoked the 1973 Yom Kippur War, when Egypt and Syria used exercises to disguise preparations for a surprise attack, warning that escalating tensions in the region could in fact trigger what he described as a «dangerous miscalculation.»

The large-scale maneuvers, the IDF said, involve the Northern Command’s 210th Division, the West Bank Division, and the Central Command’s 98th and 96th divisions, alongside the Israeli Air Force.

IRAN TARGETS US WITH PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE CAMPAIGN TO MANIPULATE AMERICANS, EMBARRASS TRUMP: EXPERTS

Advertisement

The military exercise is not against Iran directly but against Iran’s proxies and allies at the border of Israel, analysts said. ( Jalaa MAREY / AFP via Getty Images)

The exercise, scheduled just ahead of Israel’s elections Oct. 27, aims to «maintain the forces’ alertness and readiness, strengthen the ability to defend communities, and make full use of aerial capabilities for defense in the area,» according to the IDF.

On Friday, the IDF said troops would practice «a variety of scenarios, including a surprise attack and infiltration into Israeli territory by air and land,» incorporating lessons learned from the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks on Israel.

Advertisement

«This exercise is mostly about non-state actors with or without Iranian support,» Israeli national security analyst Dr. Ehud Eilam told Fox News Digital.

«It’s aimed at those in Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan who might try to infiltrate into Israel or send ground raids. Some are supported by Iran; others are not. It could be planned by Iran or be a local initiative.»

NETANYAHU PRAISES TRUMP’S ‘WICKED SENSE OF HUMOR,’ DEFENDS IRONCLAD ALLIANCE AHEAD OF HISTORIC ISRAEL VOTE

Advertisement
Iranian missiles are seen in dark sky.

Iranian missiles are seen targeting Israel during the recent conflict. (Pool via WANA/Reuters)

«This is a massive exercise, the biggest one in recent years, aimed at protecting the borders,» the former Israeli Ministry of Defense researcher added.

«It’s all about making sure that the election day on October 27 will run smoothly. It’s also a message to Iran and others: don’t try to provoke us during election day, so nothing will be disrupted.»

The Israeli drills followed a show of force by Tehran days earlier, during which the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) fired roughly 30 ballistic missiles across two distinct weapon classes, according to reports.

Advertisement

That live-fire display highlighted Iranian strike capabilities and sparked renewed alerts about commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and prompted the Israeli military to heighten its alert level while maintaining maximum readiness for a targeted strike against Iran.

TRUMP IS DISMANTLING IRAN’S WAR MACHINE, BUT AMERICA STILL NEEDS AN ENDGAME

Israeli Soldiers

The IDF is practicing surprise attack and infiltration scenarios using lessons from the Oct. 7, 2023, assault. (Amir Levy/Getty Images)

During a visit to the IDF’s Central Command on Wednesday, Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir warned that the risk of escalation was growing.

Advertisement

«Given the numerous warnings across all fronts and the sensitivity of the current period, the potential for escalation has increased,» Zamir said.

«To ensure better operational control on the ground, we have reinforced our troop deployments across all sectors, including moving the 98th Division into the area to strengthen security and stability.»

«Part of mutual deterrence: a few days ago, Iran had their own pretty big exercise, and that was actually more intimidating as far as Israel is concerned because they launched missiles and prepared for a war with Israel,» Eilam said.

Advertisement

«This exercise on Sunday and Monday is against Iran’s proxies and allies at the border of Israel.»

Sunday’s Israeli drill also followed an Oct. 19 mission in which Israeli fighter jets and aerial refueling tankers flew 800 miles across Syrian and Iraqi airspace to Iran’s border.

FROM INTELLIGENCE SHARING TO MISSILE DEFENSE, HOW ISRAEL’S PARTNERSHIP PROTECTS AMERICAN SECURITY

Advertisement
Israeli fighter jet

An Israeli fighter jet takes off for strikes in Tehran. (IDF)

Washington was notified in advance and viewed the maneuver as a non-kinetic show of force following the postponement of a broader strike package earlier in the month.

Despite the deterrence signals, Eilam warned that large-scale military exercises carry the «risk of miscalculation» and particularly when troop movements could be mistaken for preparations for an attack.

«During the Cold War, every time the Soviet Union or NATO carried out a major drill, having so many troops in the field meant they might attack if that was the intention,» Eilam said.

Advertisement

He pointed to the 1973 Yom Kippur War, when Egypt and Syria used military exercises to help conceal troop buildups along Israel’s borders.

Israeli intelligence largely dismissed the movements as routine drills, allowing the two countries to achieve strategic surprise when they launched a coordinated, two-front attack on Yom Kippur.

TRUMP SAYS NETANYAHU NEEDS TO BE RE-ELECTED, OR ELSE US WILL HAVE TO ‘FINISH THE JOB’ AGAINST IRAN ALONE

Advertisement
Syrian troops at parade in Damascus.

Military personnel perform during a military parade in Damascus, Syria, Dec. 8, 2025. (Khalil Ashawi/Reuters)

«The classic example in Israel is 1973, when Egypt and Syria conducted a major exercise just before the war that turned into the actual attack,» the analyst said.

«Israel and Iran are now watching each other very closely and both sides suspect the other might strike first,» Eilam added before stating that there is the chance of what they call «miscalculation — that each side suspects the other and strikes first by mistake.»

«It’s all about sending messages to each other.»

Advertisement

«It remains uncertain whether there will eventually be an Israeli attack on Iran because it depends on U.S. authorization,» Eilam concluded.

«Right now, both sides are signaling: ‘We are ready, don’t mess with us, but we don’t want to start a war right now.’»

Advertisement



world, middle east foreign policy, military, israel, national security, iran, syria, lebanon

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Conservative wave hits roadblock in Brazil as Lula holds off Bolsonaro challenge

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Incumbent leftist President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva narrowly defeated conservative Sen. Flavio Bolsonaro in Sunday’s presidential runoff, according to The Associated Press. The deeply polarized nation returned to the polls for a second round runoff on Sunday.

Advertisement

Lula’s victory followed chaos at polling places after a Supreme Court justice ordered a last-minute, two-hour voting extension, a move that could face a legal challenge from Bolsonaro.

While the Flavio Bolsonaro campaign had also requested an extension in certain areas impacted by heavy rains, the unusual decision by the court to extend voting hours nationwide by two hours will certainly draw scrutiny.

BRAZIL BECOMES NEXT TEST FOR LATIN AMERICA’S SURGING CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT

Advertisement

Brazil’s President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, the Workers’ Party (PT) candidate for re-election, holds a Brazilian flag as he votes during the presidential runoff election, in Sao Bernardo do Campo, Brazil, Oct.25, 2026.  (Amanda Perobelli/Reuters)

Lula petitioned for the extension, claiming that buses were not circulating to take voters to the polls as expected. 

«I’ve never complained about anything in any election before. Whether I won or lost, I’d just accept it and get ready for the next one. But this time, something abominable is happening,» Lula argued.

Advertisement

The Bolsonaro camp is likely to claim that the extension favored Lula.

Bolsonaro narrowly won the first round on Oct. 4, with 47% of the vote, to Lula’s 45%, but fell short of the 50% majority required to win the election outright.

The victory marks an unprecedented fourth presidential term for Lula, and a remarkable comeback victory. The result is even more surprising given that Bolsonaro had led, albeit by tight margins, in recent polling, and Brazil had recently elected a conservative congress aligned with the Bolsonaro agenda.

Advertisement

Earlier in the day, Lula voted in Sao Bernardo do Campo, Sao Paulo, while Bolsonaro voted in the north of Rio de Janeiro, the state he represents in the Senate.

The first vote tallies came in from Brazilians living overseas, where Lula won a decisive victory in Germany, and Bolsonaro won an overwhelming victory in Japan.

BRAZIL’S RAPID ELECTION COUNT PUTS SPOTLIGHT ON VOTING SECURITY AHEAD OF US MIDTERMS

Advertisement

While Bolsonaro performed well in his southern electoral strongholds, winning by comfortable margins in Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná, and Rio Grande do Sul, he won those states by smaller margins than in the first round.

His turnout in the south was not enough to overcome Lula’s famed Northeastern firewall; a reflection of the Workers Party dominance in the country’s populous «Nordeste» region.

Brazilians celebrate Lula victory

Supporters of Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, the Workers’ Party (PT) candidate for presidential re-election, react to the early result during the presidential runoff election, in Porto Alegre, Brazil Oct. 25, 2026.  (Diego Vara/Reuters)

Bolsonaro also turned in a disappointing performance in Minas Gerais, which geographically and politically straddles the Brazilian north/south divide. Often referred to as the nation’s quintessential bellwether state, it is fair to say that as goes Minas Gerais, so goes the nation.

Advertisement

While Bolsonaro won Minas Gerais by 5% in the first round, in the second round it was essentially tied.

Bolsonaro had received endorsements from other first round candidates: best-selling author Augusto Cury, former Minas Gerais Governor Romeu Zema, and former Goiás Governor Ronaldo Caiado.

Flavio Bolsonaro

Brazil’s right-wing senator and presidential candidate Flavio Bolsonaro of the Liberal Party (PL) gestures next to federal deputy and candidate for governor of Rio de Janeiro, Douglas Ruas (L) during a campaign rally on the eve of the general election, in Campo Grande neighborhood, in the western zone of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on October 3, 2026. Brazilians go to the polls on Oct.r 4, 2026 (Douglas SHINEIDR / AFP via Getty Images)

LATIN AMERICA’S CONSERVATIVE SHIFT FACES ITS BIGGEST TEST YET IN BRAZIL ELECTION

Advertisement

However, they were not enough to overcome the much-respected electoral machinery of the Workers Party. Lula has now appeared on the presidential ballot 7 times, winning 4 of those elections.

Heading into the first round, Flavio Bolsonaro was effectively able to make the case to working-class and middle-class voters that the Lula’s economic approach was driving up their cost of living.

He painted the Lula administration as bloated, tax-heavy, and given to racking up debt and tied this to inflation and kitchen table economics.

Advertisement
President of Brazil Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva during the UNGA

President of Brazil Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva speaks during the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) at the United Nations headquarters on September 23, 2025 in New York City. World leaders convened for the 80th Session of UNGA, with this year’s theme for the annual global meeting being «Better together: 80 years and more for peace, development and human rights.» (Photo by Taylor Hill/Getty Images)

Additionally, his message of hardline law and order appealed to a Brazilian public where voters routinely suggest that violence is the most pressing issue.

Nonetheless, these economic and security concerns were not enough to overcome a generation of loyalty to the Workers Party and its social programs, particularly in the North and Northeast of the country, where Lula won by wide margins.

While Lula will be riding high heading into a historic fourth term in office, he will face a Congress with a center-right and right-wing majority that has been described as one of the most conservative in history.

Advertisement

While Flavio Bolsonaro lost the 2026 election by a narrow margin, the Bolsonaro movement is certainly not going away, and arguably remains an influential force in modern Brazilian politics.

The Lula victory also brings to an end a long string of victories for Trump-backed right-wing candidates across the region. While Trump had not officially endorsed Flavio Bolsonaro, he made no secret of his preference, and enjoyed a close relationship with the Bolsonaro family.

Jair and Flavio Bolsonaro

Former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro’s son announces biopic while brother Senator Flávio Bolsonaro enters 2026 presidential race from prison endorsement. (Ton Molina/Getty Images/ Evaristo Sa / AFP via Getty Images)

Looking forward to 2030, all eyes will turn to Bolsonaro clan ally Tarcisio de Freitas, who stepped aside this election cycle, in order to clear the way for Flavio Bolsonaro’s run. Will the Brazilian right back another Bolsonaro in four years time, or will the popular São Paulo governor also mount a bid?

Advertisement

In addition to the presidential election, voters in five states, as well as the federal district of Brasília, were also selecting governors in runoff elections. Bolsonaro-aligned candidates appeared poised to win most of those races.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement



world elections, brazil, south america, latin america, donald trump, jair bolsonaro

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Ninth Circuit questions Trump DOJ’s emergency request to set aside 20,000 California mail ballots

Published

on



A federal appeals court on Sunday scrutinized the Trump administration’s emergency effort to force California to set aside thousands of mail-in ballots tied to people the Justice Department suspects are noncitizens ahead of the midterm elections.

The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit raised questions about both the government’s legal arguments and whether the court has jurisdiction to intervene during a hearing in which attorneys representing the Trump administration and California argued for nearly two hours, Fox News’ Matt Finn reported.

Advertisement

The federal government asked the panel to rule immediately, arguing that hundreds of thousands of California ballots could be tabulated each day while the dispute remains unresolved.

The hearing comes after the Trump administration filed an emergency request involving roughly 20,000 mail-in ballots sent to people it suspects are noncitizens.

CALIFORNIA MUST RESPOND TO DOJ’S EMERGENCY REQUEST OVER BALLOTS MAILED TO ALLEGED NONCITIZENS, COURT RULES

Advertisement

The DOJ wants California election officials to set aside ballots associated with individuals on its list while their eligibility is reviewed, rather than allowing the ballots to be processed alongside other votes.

Circuit Judge Mark Bennett, a Trump appointee, questioned whether the administration’s requested injunction could be reconciled with the Constitution’s Elections Clause, which gives state legislatures authority over the times, places and manner of congressional elections, subject to congressional regulation.

«It seems to me that you want us to issue an injunction that is entirely inconsistent with the law that the California legislature has adopted pursuant to the Elections Clause,» he told Justice Department attorney Matthew Donnelly.

Advertisement

BLANCHE WON’T RULE OUT DOJ BLOCKING ELECTION CERTIFICATION IN ‘DOOMSDAY’ SCENARIO

«How can we do that?»

The panel also questioned whether the Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction to intervene at this stage.

Advertisement

Judge Gabriel Sanchez, a Biden appointee, questioned why the Ninth Circuit should weigh in when the district court has yet to rule on the DOJ’s request and a hearing before U.S. District Judge David Carter remains scheduled for Tuesday.

Judge Patrick Bumatay, another Trump appointee, focused more heavily on the government’s concerns about potential noncitizen voting and questioned California’s handling of challenges involving suspected ineligible voters.

The Justice Department sought emergency relief from the appeals court after Carter did not rule by a deadline previously requested by the department.

Advertisement

California, meanwhile, has argued that the Ninth Circuit should not intervene before the lower court has ruled.

The Justice Department initially filed the suit Oct. 15, roughly two weeks after California began mailing ballots.

TRUMP SCORES SUPREME COURT WIN IN ELECTION INTEGRITY FIGHT AS STATES GAIN NEW VOTER ROLL TOOL

Advertisement

Before oral arguments, the Trump administration accused California of having a history of «mishandling voter rolls.»

California has disputed the federal government’s underlying data while emphasizing that it has robust safeguards against noncitizen voting. Los Angeles County officials have said a preliminary review of a portion of the federal government’s list identified apparent discrepancies, including people who were born in the United States or were not registered to vote. In a filing this weekend, California argued that the federal government’s theory would «turn the Constitution on its head.»

«When it comes to rules of elections administration, the federal government has no power to interfere with the States unless Congress passes a law governing the time, place, or manner of elections,» the state contended.

Advertisement

More than 3 million people have already cast ballots statewide, including more than 500,000 in Los Angeles County, according to figures cited during the litigation.

The Justice Department has emphasized the urgency of its request, arguing that each day without a ruling risks allowing additional ballots to be processed before the citizenship dispute can be resolved.

Bennett said the three-judge panel would try to issue a ruling as quickly as possible.

Advertisement

Reuters contributed to this report.

politics, elections disputes, voting, justice department, california, appeals, law

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

“Giro inédito”: las primeras reacciones de los medios de Brasil tras la reelección de Lula da Silva

Published

on



Con el 51,76% de los votos, Lula da Silva se impuso este domingo a Flávio Bolsonaro, que obtuvo el 48,24%, en el balotaje presidencial de Brasil y logró así un cuarto mandato no consecutivo. Los principales medios brasileños resaltaron la remontada electoral del presidente, que había terminado segundo en la primera vuelta, en sus títulos sobre el resultado.

“Lula será presidente por cuarta vez” fue el título de Folha de S.Paulo, cuya bajada subrayó que el mandatario de 80 años venció a Flávio Bolsonaro mediante un giro electoral inédito. El diario publicó además artículos acerca de los retos económicos y políticos que enfrentará el próximo Gobierno, así como de los efectos de la derrota sobre la derecha brasileña.

Advertisement

“Lula será presidente por cuarta vez” fue el título de Folha de S.Paulo

Con el encabezado “Con un giro inédito, Lula es reelegido para su cuarto mandato como presidente de Brasil”, CNN Brasil puso el acento en la remontada del líder del Partido de los Trabajadores (PT) y en la continuidad de este al frente del país.

“Con un giro inédito, Lula es reelegido para su cuarto mandato como presidente de Brasil” (CNN Brasil)

“Lula es reelegido tras un giro inédito” tituló G1. Según indicó en la bajada, el presidente dio vuelta la derrota de la primera ronda tras una fuerte movilización y se impuso en una elección ajustada. También alertó por las dificultades de gobernar sin mayoría oficialista en el Congreso y de equilibrar las cuentas públicas luego de ampliar los beneficios durante la campaña.

“Lula es reelegido tras un giro inédito” tituló G1

UOL, a su vez, eligió “Lula es reelegido” como título y señaló en la bajada que el dirigente del PT gobernará Brasil por cuarta ocasión, tras una victoria histórica.

Advertisement

UOL, a su vez, eligió “Lula es reelegido” como título

Lula había alcanzado el 45,1% de los votos en la primera vuelta, mientras que Flávio Bolsonaro obtuvo el 47%. Desde 1989, cuando regresaron las elecciones presidenciales directas, ningún candidato que terminara segundo en la primera ronda había logrado imponerse en el balotaje.

Luego del resultado inicial, Lula activó a sus bases y promovió medidas sociales para reducir la diferencia con su rival. Los derechos sociales, la inversión pública, la seguridad basada en inteligencia y el control de la deforestación amazónica fueron los ejes de su agenda de campaña.

Frente a la posibilidad de que la familia Bolsonaro volviera al poder, el presidente definió la elección como “una defensa de la democracia”. Este domingo, al votar en el estado de San Pablo, sostuvo que su adversario pretendía “gobernar con la bandera estadounidense” y adelantó que los brasileños optarían por un país en el que los colores nacionales “sean respetados”.

Advertisement

Bajo la consigna “Nunca más Bolsonaro”, la izquierda convocó a sus simpatizantes con cuestionamientos a la gestión de la pandemia de covid, que causó 700.000 muertes, y a los recortes en programas públicos durante la presidencia del expresidente. Flávio Bolsonaro había ofrecido, en cambio, cambios ante un contexto atravesado por el alza del costo de vida y la inseguridad.

Lula respondió a las propuestas de su adversario con la defensa de la protección social y una advertencia: “El cambio no es privar a la gente de sus derechos”.

A diez días del balotaje, el Congreso dio luz verde a la reducción de la semana laboral: pasó de seis a cinco días y de 44 a 40 horas semanales, sin reducción salarial. En la etapa final de la campaña, Flávio Bolsonaro apoyó la norma, mientras que dirigentes empresariales advirtieron que los costos laborales afectarían a las pequeñas empresas, la inflación y el empleo informal.

Advertisement

Lula respondió a las propuestas de su adversario con la defensa de la protección social y una advertencia: “El cambio no es privar a la gente de sus derechos” (REUTERS)

Durante la semana anterior a los comicios, el Gobierno elevó 15% el monto de Bolsa Família. La iniciativa alcanza a casi 50 millones de personas y requiere 5.800 millones de reales —equivalentes a USD 1.168 millones— para lo que resta del año.

Créditos públicos con bajas tasas de interés, incentivos fiscales destinados a pequeñas empresas y un plan de refinanciación para borrar los registros de morosidad de millones de brasileños de bajos ingresos también recibieron el respaldo de la administración. Para los próximos tres años, el paquete de préstamos y renegociaciones implicará un costo calculado en 3.000 millones de reales, o USD 604 millones.

Como parte de las medidas sobre los precios, el Gobierno suspendió durante 30 días, con opción de prórroga, los impuestos federales sobre la importación y la venta de gasolina, además de subsidiar el diésel destinado a importadores. Ambas resoluciones tendrían un costo de 5.200 millones de reales, equivalentes a USD 1.047 millones.

Advertisement

Además, Lula remitió al Congreso un proyecto que busca implementar transporte público gratuito los fines de semana. De acuerdo con las estimaciones mencionadas durante la campaña, el programa demandaría entre 5.000 millones y 16.000 millones de reales, según el modelo de aplicación.

South America / Central America,Elections / Voting

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias