Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

GOP rebel mutiny threatens to derail Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ before key committee hurdle

Published

on


President Donald Trump’s «big, beautiful bill» appears to be in peril as of late Thursday afternoon, ahead of a critical meeting by the House Budget Committee to bring the legislation close to a House-wide vote.

At least three Republicans on the committee are expected to vote against advancing the bill, a multitrillion-dollar piece of legislation aimed at enacting Trump’s priorities on tax, the border, immigration, defense, energy and raising the debt limit.

Advertisement

GOP Reps. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., and Ralph Norman, R-S.C., both told Fox News Digital they would vote against the bill in committee in its current form.

Norman said Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, also would vote against the bill. Roy himself signaled he was opposed to the legislation both on X and in comments to reporters.

ANTI-ABORTION PROVIDER MEASURE IN TRUMP’S ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL’ COULD SPARK HOUSE GOP REBELLION

Advertisement

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., is guiding House Republicans through President Donald Trump’s «big, beautiful bill.» (AP/Getty Images)

«Right now, the House proposal fails to meet the moment. It does not meaningfully change spending (Medicaid expansion to able bodied, [Inflation Reduction Act] subsidies). Plus many of the decent provisions and cuts, don’t begin until 2029 and beyond. That is swamp accounting to dodge real savings,» Roy wrote Thursday on X.

Other members of the committee also suggested they had concerns.

Advertisement

Rep. Josh Brecheen, R-Okla., told Fox News Digital he wanted the Friday morning meeting delayed.

And Rep. Glenn Grothman, R-Wis., a rank-and-file member who is not known for defying House Republican leaders, said the legislation did not seem «sincere» and would not reveal how he will vote.

With one expected absence for Republicans on the House Budget Committee, the GOP can only afford one «no» vote to still advance the legislation.

Advertisement

Once the bill is passed through the House Budget Committee, it must then come before the House Rules Committee — which sets terms for debating the bill House-wide — before it is weighed by all House lawmakers.

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has said he wants the legislation to pass the House by Memorial Day.

Rep. Ralph Norman

Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., said he would vote against the bill in its current form in the House Budget Committee. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via)

«I think we’re on schedule,» Johnson told reporters leaving a conference-wide meeting on the bill Thursday afternoon. 

Advertisement

He also said he was confident Budget Committee Republicans could advance the bill on Friday.

«I’m talking to everybody and I think we’re gonna get this thing done on the schedule that we proposed,» Johnson said in response to conservative concerns.

Both Norman and Roy have complained that the legislation’s provisions aimed at curbing abuse of the Medicaid system and rolling back former President Joe Biden’s green energy subsidies in the Inflation Reduction Act did not go far enough.

Advertisement

Timing is among their key concerns on both fronts. Conservatives have issues with Medicaid work requirements not going into effect until 2029, the end of Trump’s term. They also questioned what they saw as a delay in phasing out green energy tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act. 

«I questioned the timing on work requirements, I questioned the IRS phase-outs. I didn’t get an answer on that,» Norman told reporters after the Thursday afternoon meeting. «My point is, we need to have answers before it hits the floor.»

Clyde told Fox News Digital of his opposition, «I’m a NO on advancing the budget reconciliation bill out of the Budget Committee in its current form.»

Advertisement

«I’m actively involved in negotiations to improve this package, and I’m hopeful that we will do so quickly in order to successfully deliver on President Trump’s agenda for the American people,» he said.

Another issue at hand involves continued tensions over state and local tax (SALT) deductions, which primarily affect high cost-of-living states — and Republicans representing critical swing districts within blue states.

The Trump bill currently would raise the SALT deduction cap from $10,000 for single and married tax filers to $30,000 — a number that’s not enough for a group of moderate House Republicans that’s large enough to sink the final bill.

Advertisement

Conservative fiscal hawks have said higher SALT deduction caps must be paired with deeper spending cuts.

BROWN UNIVERSITY IN GOP CROSSHAIRS AFTER STUDENT’S DOGE-LIKE EMAIL KICKS OFF FRENZY

«SALT is a pay-for,» Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., who is not on the budget committee, said in response to conservatives asking for offsets. 

Advertisement
Rep Mike Lawler, R-N.Y.

Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., said he would vote against the bill if SALT deduction caps were not sufficient.  (Tierney L. Cross)

He pointed out that SALT deduction caps would be eliminated entirely if Trump’s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which Republicans want to extend permanently via this bill, is allowed to expire.

«The fact is, if the tax bill expires, the cap on SALT expires, which means it goes back to unlimited. So any cap is a savings within the bill,» Lawler said. «So this idea that we need to find a pay-for, that’s not an us problem. That’s other people’s problems.»

But Rep. Nick LaLota, R-N.Y., another SALT Caucus member, signaled he would be OK with moving up the deadline on Medicaid work requirements in exchange for raising the SALT deduction cap.

Advertisement

House GOP leaders are expected to continue negotiating with both groups, however.

Both Johnson and House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said they expected the Budget Committee meeting to go on as planned.

House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, however, seemed less optimistic.

Advertisement

«We’ll see,» he said when asked about the Friday meeting, adding the likely «no» votes are «potentially enough to delay it.»

Congressional Republicans are moving Trump’s agenda via the budget reconciliation process.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

By lowering the Senate’s threshold for passage down to the House’s own simple majority requirement, it allows the party in control of both chambers and the White House to pass vast pieces of legislation while entirely sidelining the minority — in this case, Democrats.

Eleven House committees have cobbled together individual portions of the bill, which will be put back into a framework that the House Budget Committee will consider Friday morning.

Then it must head to the Senate, which will likely amend the bill, which then must sync up with the House before arriving on Trump’s desk for a signature.

Advertisement

House Of Representatives,Republicans,Donald Trump

INTERNACIONAL

Schumer, Democrats try to save face, blame GOP for possible government shutdown

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Congressional Democrats are trying to get on the same page and display a unified front after threatening to derail the government funding process.

Advertisement

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., met behind closed doors Tuesday night, along with the top Democrats in the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, to plot a course forward in the forthcoming government funding fight.

SENATE WEATHERS DEM OPPOSITION, ADVANCES FIRST GOVERNMENT FUNDING BILL

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., turns to an aide during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Advertisement

The meeting came after Democrats in the upper chamber overwhelmingly supported the first government funding bill to hit the Senate floor, one that would fund military construction and Veterans Affairs. Ahead of the vote, Senate Democrats had signaled they may vote against the bill and further obstruct the appropriations process because of highly partisan legislation rammed through the upper chamber by Senate Republicans.

«We all want to pursue a bipartisan, bicameral appropriations process,» Schumer said. «That’s how it’s always been done, successfully, and we believe that, however, the Republicans are making it extremely difficult to do that.»

The meeting just off the Senate floor was meant to get congressional Democrats on board with a messaging plan over the next weeks and months ahead of the Sept. 30 deadline to fund the government.

Advertisement

CONGRESSIONAL REPUBLICANS FACE BRUISING BATTLE TO AVOID GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN

John Thune

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., is seen after the Senate luncheons in the U.S. Capitol on June 24, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

It was also likely designed to prevent a repeat of the Democratic debacle in March, when Schumer broke with Jeffries and threatened to shutter the government before ultimately caving and providing Republicans the votes necessary to advance yet another government funding extension, known as a continuing resolution.

Republicans are quick to point out that when Schumer led the upper chamber, none of the House GOP’s spending bills made it to the floor — in Congress, the spending process begins in the lower chamber.

Advertisement

Since taking over earlier this year, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., has committed to returning to regular order, or passing each of the dozen spending bills to fund the government, and trying to get the appropriations process back to normal.

However, it’s a feat that hasn’t been successfully done in Washington since the late 1990s. 

«Frankly, I think a lot of us around here think [this] is long overdue,» Thune said.  

Advertisement

However, Democrats contend that their trust in Republicans is wearing thin after two major partisan bills, one being President Donald Trump’s «big, beautiful bill,» and the other the president’s $9 billion clawback package, were pushed through the chamber without any Democratic input.

‘BAIT AND SWITCH’: SCHUMER WARNS OF BITTER FUNDING FIGHT OVER GOP CUTS PLAN

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries

Representative Hakeem Jeffries, a Democrat from New York, speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 6, 2025. (Tierney L. Cross/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Thune argued that Senate Democrats were using the rescissions package to shut down the appropriations process and effectively shut down the government.

Advertisement

In the Senate, most bills that come to the floor require at least 60 votes to smash through the filibuster, meaning that most legislation requires bipartisan support to some extent.

Earlier this year, the House GOP produced a partisan government funding extension that was a tough pill for Senate Democrats to swallow, but they still ultimately opted to vote for it. This time around, they’re demanding more involvement in the process.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Jeffries said that congressional Democrats would play ball if the process was «bipartisan and bicameral in nature» and put the onus of a partial government shutdown at the feet of congressional Republicans.

«House Republicans are, in fact, marching us toward a possible government shutdown that will hurt the American people,» he said.

However, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., threw the responsibility on Democrats over whether the government would shutter or stay open come the end of September.

Advertisement

«They’re gaming out how they can shut the government down,» Johnson told Bloomberg Government. 

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Ucrania: el presidente Volodimir Zelenski enfrenta críticas y protestas por una nueva ley anticorrupción

Published

on


Activistas ucranianos convocaron más protestas este miércoles contra una ley que, según ellos, debilita los organismos anticorrupción del país, tras la primera gran manifestación contra el gobierno del país en más de tres años de guerra. La legislación también ha recibido críticas de funcionarios de la Unión Europea y grupos internacionales de derechos humanos.

El presidente, Volodimyi Zelenski, presionado porque la medida amenazaba con poner en peligro su apoyo público en un momento crítico de la guerra, citó a los jefes de las principales agencias anticorrupción y de seguridad de Ucrania el miércoles por la mañana en respuesta a la protesta contra su decisión de aprobar la nueva ley aprobada por el Parlamento.

Advertisement

“Todos escuchamos lo que dice la sociedad”, escribió Zelenski en Telegram después de la reunión. Sin embargo, insistió en que el nuevo marco legal era necesario para combatir más duramente la corrupción.

“Los casos penales no deberían prolongarse durante años sin veredictos, y aquellos que trabajan contra Ucrania no deben sentirse cómodos o inmunes al castigo”, dijo el líder ucraniano.

Dijo que todas las agencias gubernamentales acordaron trabajar de forma constructiva y responder a las expectativas públicas de equidad y eficacia. Se espera un plan de acción conjunto detallado dentro de dos semanas, destinado a abordar las debilidades institucionales, eliminar obstáculos legales y garantizar la justicia en todos los ámbitos, dijo.

Advertisement
Ucranianos protestan en la primera manifestación en tiempos de guerra contra una ley recién aprobada que limita la independencia de las instituciones anticorrupción. Foto Reuters

Miles de personas se reunieron en la capital y otras ciudades de Ucrania el martes por la noche para instar a Zelenski a vetar un controvertido proyecto de ley. Después de que Zelenski lo aprobara, los activistas convocaron en las redes sociales otra protesta en el centro de Kiev a las 8 de la tarde del miércoles.

La legislación endurece la supervisión gubernamental de dos agencias anticorrupción clave. Los críticos dicen que la medida podría debilitar significativamente la independencia de esas agencias y otorgar al círculo de Zelenski una mayor influencia sobre las investigaciones.

Advertencia de funcionarios de la UE

Advertisement

Combatir la corrupción arraigada es crucial para las aspiraciones de Ucrania de unirse a la UE y mantener el acceso a miles de millones de dólares en ayuda occidental en su lucha contra la invasión de tres años de Rusia.

“Limitar la independencia de la agencia anticorrupción de Ucrania obstaculiza el camino de Ucrania hacia la UE”, advirtió este miércoles el ministro de Asuntos Exteriores de Alemania, Johann Wadephul, en una publicación en X.

El comisario de Defensa de la UE, Andrius Kubilius, señaló también en X que: “En la guerra, la confianza entre la nación combatiente y su liderazgo es más importante que las armas modernas. Difícil de construir y mantener, pero fácil de perder con un error significativo del liderazgo”.

Advertisement
El presidente ucraniano, Volodimir Zelenski, convocó a los jefes de todas las agencias de investigación y de lucha contra la corrupción del país. Foto EFEEl presidente ucraniano, Volodimir Zelenski, convocó a los jefes de todas las agencias de investigación y de lucha contra la corrupción del país. Foto EFE

La rama ucraniana de Transparencia Internacional criticó la decisión del Parlamento, diciendo que socava una de las reformas más significativas desde lo que Ucrania llama su Revolución de la Dignidad en 2014, y daña la confianza con los socios internacionales. Acusó a las autoridades de “desmantelar” la arquitectura anticorrupción del país.

Zelenski ha sido el rostro internacional de la determinación de Ucrania ante la invasión total de Rusia, y sus problemas internos son una distracción no deseada del esfuerzo de guerra.

Zelenski dijo que la medida elimina la “influencia rusa” de la lucha contra la corrupción y garantiza el castigo para aquellos que sean encontrados culpables de ella, después de lo que él describió como retrasos de años en procedimientos penales que involucran enormes cantidades de dinero.

“Los casos que se han quedado parados deben ser investigados”, dijo Zelenski en una publicación de Telegram después de la medianoche del miércoles. “Durante años, funcionarios que han huido de Ucrania han estado viviendo casualmente en el extranjero por alguna razón, en países muy agradables y sin consecuencias legales, y esto no es normal”, dijo. No proporcionó ejemplos de lo que dijo era interferencia rusa.

Advertisement

Las autoridades rusas disfrutaron de las dificultades de Zelenski. La portavoz del Ministerio ruso de Exteriores, María Zajárova, se burló de las afirmaciones de Zelenski sobre la infiltración rusa en la agencia anticorrupción, señalando sarcásticamente que “también podrían sacar un par de osos de la esquina”.

Negociaciones en Estambul

Delegaciones de Rusia y Ucrania tenían previsto reunirse en Estambul este miércoles para su tercera ronda de conversaciones directas en dos meses, dijeron funcionarios del Kremlin y ucranianos. No se esperaba que la reunión lograra progresos en poner fin a la guerra y probablemente se centraría en los intercambios de prisioneros de guerra.

Advertisement

Los cambios legislativos otorgarían al fiscal general nueva autoridad sobre las investigaciones y casos manejados por la Oficina Nacional Anticorrupción de Ucrania (NABU) y la Oficina del Fiscal Especializado en Anticorrupción (SAPO).

El ambiente de ira y frustración entre los ucranianos cansados de la guerra prevaleció en la multitud el martes. Algunos manifestantes acusaron a los líderes de Ucrania de priorizar la lealtad y las conexiones personales sobre la lucha contra la corrupción.

“Aquellos que juraron proteger las leyes y la Constitución han elegido en su lugar proteger a su círculo íntimo, incluso a expensas de la democracia ucraniana”, dijo el veterano Oleh Symoroz, sentado en una silla de ruedas porque le amputaron ambas piernas después de ser herido en 2022.

Advertisement

Ucrania,Volodímir Zelenski,Rusia,Guerra Rusia-Ucrania

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump admin official to meet with Israel, Qatar amid push for Gaza ceasefire

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Special Envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to meet with Israeli and Qatari officials in Rome on Thursday as the U.S. pushes for a ceasefire deal in Gaza. 

Advertisement

Hamas and Israel are engaging in indirect negotiations to end the war that has raged on for nearly two years. However, Witkoff’s itinerary depends on the progress made in the talks. If the parties make enough progress in Rome, Witkoff will reportedly travel to Doha to finalize the deal, according to Axios. 

The outlet also reported that sources indicated the meeting in Rome could suggest that a deal is near — possibly just days away.

Earlier this month, Israel agreed to a U.S.-backed, 60-day ceasefire proposal that would lead to the end of the war. This deal includes a phased release of hostages, the withdrawal of Israeli troops from parts of Gaza and talks on ending the conflict, according to Reuters.

Advertisement

Special Envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to meet with Israeli and Qatari officials in Rome on Thursday to secure a deal to end the war in Gaza. (Dawoud Abo Alkas/Anadolu/Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

ISRAEL, HAMAS TALKS DRAG AS AID GROUP CHAIR TELLS UN TO STOP ACTING LIKE THE ‘MAFIA’

«My representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza. Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the war. The Qataris and Egyptians, who have worked very hard to help bring peace, will deliver this final proposal. I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this deal because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE,» President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on July 1.

Advertisement
President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dine together in Washington, D.C.

President Donald Trump holds a bilateral dinner with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in attendance, at the White House in Washington, D.C., July 7, 2025. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)

ISRAEL ACCEPTS TRUMP-LED CEASEFIRE PLAN THAT COULD END GAZA WAR WITHIN 60 DAYS

Trump appeared optimistic about the possibility of Israel and Hamas reaching a deal to end the war. On July 16, while signing the HALT Fentanyl Act, Trump thanked Witkoff, praising him for doing «a fantastic job» and said that there was «some good news on Gaza,» though he did not elaborate.

Abraham Accords signing

From left to right, Foreign Affairs Minister of Bahrain Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani, Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu, President Donald Trump and Foreign Affairs Minister of the United Arab Emirates Abdullah bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan participate in the signing ceremony of the Abraham Accords on the South Lawn of the White House on Sept. 15, 2020, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

TRUMP PRESSURES ISRAEL TO END GAZA CONFLICT AS HE EYES ABRAHAM ACCORDS EXPANSION

Advertisement

If Trump can secure an end to the war, it could mean an expansion of the Abraham Accords, one of the signature efforts of Trump’s first administration, which saw Israel sign normalization agreements with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan. However, Trump has yet to detail which countries would be added.

Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs Gideon Sa’ar said on June 30 that Israel was «serious» about seeking an end to the conflict. He added that Jerusalem has an interest in «countries, such as Syria and Lebanon, our neighbors, to the circle of peace and normalization.»

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Greg Wehner and Caitlin McFall contributed to this report.


Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias