Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Los objetivos contrapuestos en Brasil: entre proteger la Amazonia y bombear mucho más petróleo

Published

on


RÍO DE JANEIRO — A través de la ventana de su oficina, el director de la compañía petrolera estatal de Brasil contemplaba el desordenado paisaje de Río de Janeiro.

Atrás, al otro lado de los ruinosos rascacielos de la ciudad, estaba la imponente estatua del Cristo Redentor.

Advertisement

Los halcones rodearon un montón de basura rebosante.

Columnas de humo se elevaban desde un incendio en una favela en la ladera de una colina.

Su empresa, Petrobras, está planeando un aumento tan rápido en la producción de petróleo que podría convertirse en el tercer mayor productor del mundo para 2030, una transformación que él cree que podría desempeñar un papel en la reducción de la pobreza que salpica su panorama.

Advertisement

Esto, incluso cuando su país se posiciona como líder en la lucha contra el cambio climático, que, por supuesto, está impulsado principalmente por la quema de petróleo y otros combustibles fósiles.

Petrobras ya bombea aproximadamente tanto petróleo crudo por año como ExxonMobil, según Rystad Energy, una firma de investigación de mercado.

petro Ana Toni en la sede del principal instituto medioambiental de Brasil. Lo ideal, dijo, sería que Petrobras invirtiera más en energías renovables. Foto Victor Moriyama para The New York Times.petro Ana Toni en la sede del principal instituto medioambiental de Brasil. Lo ideal, dijo, sería que Petrobras invirtiera más en energías renovables. Foto Victor Moriyama para The New York Times.

En los próximos años, se prevé que supere a las compañías petroleras nacionales de China, Rusia y Kuwait, dejando sólo a Arabia Saudita e Irán bombeando más que Petrobras para 2030.

Es una situación enorme para el presidente de Brasil, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, más conocido simplemente como Lula, quien se ha perfilado como el líder mundial preeminente en cuestiones climáticas.

Advertisement

Según todos los indicios, en los últimos años Lula ha llegado a creer que el cambio climático es un importante factor de pobreza y desigualdad, que durante décadas de carrera política ha prometido erradicar.

Desde que fue elegido en 2022, Lula ha reducido drásticamente la deforestación en el Amazonas y ha supervisado un desarrollo considerable de energía renovable.

Pero también presidirá el auge petrolero de Petrobras y un período de crecientes importaciones de gas, los cuales facilitarán el creciente hambre de Brasil por vuelos baratos, dietas más sustanciosas y hogares con aire acondicionado.

Advertisement

Por muy contradictorio que parezca, es justo, dijo Jean Paul Prates, director ejecutivo de Petrobras, encaramado en lo alto de la reluciente sede de su empresa.

“No renunciaremos a esa prerrogativa”, dijo, “porque otros no estén haciendo también su propio sacrificio”.

Es un argumento que atormenta los esfuerzos globales para reducir la dependencia de los combustibles fósiles.

Advertisement

Los países industrializados como Estados Unidos, que se convirtieron en superpotencias económicas al emitir enormes cantidades de gases de efecto invernadero, siguen siendo los mayores productores y consumidores de combustibles fósiles per cápita del mundo.

Y si no paran, ¿por qué debería hacerlo Brasil?

La principal asesora de Lula sobre cambio climático, Ana Toni, directora de varios grupos sin fines de lucro desde hace mucho tiempo, dijo que, idealmente, Petrobras reduciría su producción de petróleo e invertiría más en energías renovables, transformándose esencialmente en un nuevo tipo de empresa.

Advertisement
Una refinería cerca de São Paulo, Brasil. Petrobras ya rivaliza con ExxonMobil en barriles de petróleo producidos y está creciendo rápidamente. Foto Andre Penner/Associated PressUna refinería cerca de São Paulo, Brasil. Petrobras ya rivaliza con ExxonMobil en barriles de petróleo producidos y está creciendo rápidamente. Foto Andre Penner/Associated Press

Pero se hizo eco de Prates y dijo que hasta que todo el mundo actuara unido, con los más ricos a la cabeza, los países en desarrollo se resistirían a hacer sus propios sacrificios.

Como muchos en Brasil, Toni señaló el ejemplo de advertencia de la vecina Colombia, cuyo presidente se embarcó en un plan ambicioso, el primero para cualquier país productor de petróleo, para eliminar gradualmente su producción de combustible fósil.

“La valiente decisión de Colombia está siendo considerada por el mercado como una fuente de inseguridad económica. Es realmente el peor de los casos”, dijo.

«Me gustaría que los países más ricos que el nuestro mantuvieran una conversación real sobre la adopción de esas medidas y no nos lo dejaran a nosotros, los vulnerables».

Advertisement

Tensión

Esa tensión ha dominado años de negociaciones sobre el clima y una vez más ocupará un lugar central en la cumbre de este año patrocinada por las Naciones Unidas que se celebrará en noviembre en Azerbaiyán.

Allí, los negociadores de casi todas las naciones del mundo esperan abordar el espinoso tema de cómo los países más ricos pueden canalizar más dinero hacia los más pobres para ayudarlos a adoptar fuentes de energía más limpias y adaptarse a los efectos del cambio climático.

Advertisement

Después de Azerbaiyán, el próximo anfitrión de la cumbre climática de la ONU será Brasil.

La cumbre tendrá lugar en Belém, una ciudad al borde del Amazonas, cerca de un lugar donde Petrobras había propuesto explorar en busca de petróleo.

Pero en uno de los pocos casos en que el gobierno brasileño restringió la industria petrolera, la idea fue bloqueada.

Advertisement

Prates dijo que Petrobras estaba apelando la decisión.

Mientras tanto, Petrobras planea gastar más de 7 mil millones de dólares durante los próximos cinco años en la exploración de posibles sitios de perforación costa afuera a lo largo de otros tramos de la costa de Brasil para aumentar su ya creciente producción.

Petrobras, como muchas otras compañías de petróleo y gas, proyecta internamente que la demanda de sus productos seguirá siendo obstinadamente alta.

Advertisement

En consecuencia, la compañía opera con un conjunto de supuestos radicalmente diferentes a los previstos por la Agencia Internacional de Energía y otros que dicen que la demanda de petróleo ya ha alcanzado su punto máximo o está cerca de hacerlo.

Eso deja a países como Brasil en una especie de zona gris de hacer de todo, dijo Mercedes Bustamante, profesora y ecologista de la Universidad de Brasilia y miembro del Grupo Asesor de Crisis Climática, un grupo independiente de científicos.

Dos puntas

Advertisement

Brasil está cultivando tanto energías renovables como combustibles fósiles.

Este año se unió a la OPEP, el cártel petrolero global, como observador, incluso cuando el próximo año planea ser anfitrión de las negociaciones climáticas globales de la ONU.

Para 2030 será el quinto mayor productor de petróleo del mundo, según datos de Rystad.

Advertisement

Esta dinámica se refleja también en los bosques, afirmó Bustamante.

El desmonte de tierras en el Amazonas se ha reducido, pero simultáneamente está aumentando en el Cerrado, una vasta sabana que cubre gran parte del centro de Brasil.

“Tener ambas cosas es una gran parte del ADN político de Brasil”, dijo Oliver Stuenkel, profesor de la Escuela de Relaciones Internacionales de la Fundação Getulio Vargas en Sao Paulo.

Advertisement

“Seremos una superpotencia verde, sí, pero no vamos a correr riesgos innecesarios. Eso significa prepararse para un mundo en el que el petróleo desempeñará un papel importante durante mucho tiempo y la transición llevará más tiempo de lo esperado”.

Prates dijo que hablaba con Lula cada dos semanas y lo estaba presionando para que entendiera que una transición para abandonar los combustibles fósiles debe ser “sabiamente lenta”.

«Eso significa no ser lento porque no queremos hacer una transición, sino lento porque necesitamos corresponder a las expectativas del mercado de petróleo, gas y sus derivados», dijo.

Advertisement

“Petrobras llegará hasta el final de la última gota de petróleo, del mismo modo que Arabia Saudita o los Emiratos harán lo mismo”.

Petrobras tiene algunas ventajas importantes a largo plazo, incluso si la demanda de petróleo está alcanzando su punto máximo.

La producción de petróleo de los sitios costa afuera de Brasil cerca de Río y San Pablo cuesta aproximadamente 35 dólares por barril, muy por debajo del punto de referencia internacional de 90 dólares.

Advertisement

Esto se debe en parte a que su producción requiere menos energía, lo que lo hace marginalmente más limpio y más deseable para algunos compradores conscientes de las emisiones.

El gobierno de Lula también enfrenta un electorado polarizado que en general, según encuestas recientes, no considera el cambio climático como un tema de votación.

«La mitad de la población no tiene acceso a aguas residuales tratadas», afirmó Stuenkel.

Advertisement

“Brasil tiene un conjunto de demandas públicas muy diferente al de los países más ricos. Queda un largo camino por recorrer para convencer a los votantes brasileños de que es necesaria una dolorosa reorganización de la sociedad para evitar el cambio climático”.

Sin embargo, a Lula le importa profundamente, dijo Toni, su asesor climático.

El mundo depende del liderazgo de Brasil en esta cuestión y ha hecho promesas ambiciosas para reducir sus emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero.

Advertisement

Esas promesas son más ambiciosas, aseguró señalar, que las de Estados Unidos o muchos otros países que tienen niveles de vida más altos que Brasil.

Considera que es una buena señal que Brasil esté bajo presión para repensar su expansión petrolera.

Para ella, significa que Brasil ha tenido tanto éxito en el frente de la deforestación que la gente está exigiendo estándares más altos.

Advertisement

Pero todo eso será en vano si los actores más importantes no reflejan esa ambición.

«Incluso si Brasil deja de producir petróleo mañana», dijo.

“Estados Unidos, Rusia y otros no se detendrán”.

Advertisement

c.2024 The New York Times Company



Source link

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Lithuanian defense minister: Only way to negotiate with Russia is with a ‘gun on the table’

Published

on


EXCLUSIVE: Growing up under Soviet rule, Lithuanian Defense Minister Dovilė Šakalienė was not allowed to celebrate Christmas. Her mother was born in a Siberian prison camp. 

The crime?

Advertisement

Her teenage brother was caught handing out leaflets that said, «Lithuania is free.» After 50 years of Soviet occupation during the Cold War, many Lithuanians today are wary of any negotiations with Russian President Vladimir Putin and are watching the Kremlin’s next moves closely.

«In my opinion, the only efficient diplomacy with Russia was what Al Capone said, the only good negotiation is when you have a gun on the table. So that’s probably the kind of diplomacy that would work with Russia,» Šakalienė warned during an interview at the Lithuanian Embassy in Washington Friday.

When asked if Putin could be trusted, the 46-year-old defense minister, who once lived in Albuquerque, New Mexico, as an exchange student, replied, «Are you kidding me? After what was done to my family and by Russia for generations, I don’t think you would find any Lithuanian who could trust Vladimir Putin.»

Advertisement

Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine is now more than three years old. Since returning to office, President Donald Trump has engaged in direct talks with Russia to end the war.

TRUMP SAYS INTEL PAUSE ON UKRAINE HAS BEEN ‘JUST ABOUT’ LIFTED; SAYS TARIFFS WILL MAKE AMERICA RICH

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Lithuania’s defense minister Dovilė Šakalienė

Lithuanian Defense Minister Dovilė Šakalienė sat down for an interview with Fox News and discussed Russian President Vladimir Putin. (Reuters Photos | Fox News)

«Historically, Russia has never ever kept an agreement,» Šakalienė said.» Our only hope is that the tough and harsh approach by President Donald Trump may be the only safeguard keeping Putin in check. So let’s hope that happens.»

Advertisement

Located in Eastern Europe with a population of 2.8 million in an area roughly the size of West Virginia, Lithuania cannot afford to ignore Russia. It shares a 184-mile border with Russia (Kaliningrad) as well as a 420-mile border with Belarus, which she says is «now just a platform for the Russian army.»

She said, «They are trying to frighten us. They are trying to make us feel insecure,» about the Russian forces next door.

Lithuania is ramping up defense spending as a result of Russia launching its full-scale invasion of Ukraine and plans to exceed Trump’s demand that NATO allies spend 5% of GDP on defense. Šakalienė said her country hopes to reach 6% by next year. The U.S. currently spends 3.4%.

Advertisement

Last month, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also urged NATO allies to ramp up defense spending. «The United States will no longer tolerate an imbalanced relationship which encourages dependency,» he warned at NATO headquarters in Brussels on his first overseas trip.

As a NATO defense minister, Šakalienė was there in Brussels. She applauded Hegseth’s remarks, calling them an «ice-cold bucket of water.»

Putin speaking at the podium.

Russian President Putin giving a speech in Moscow. (Photo by Contributor/Getty Images)

«I saw the faces of my colleagues. A lot of shock, a lot of stress,» she said. «Nobody in the room mentioned 2% [of GDP] which is so redundant, irrelevant, inadequate. It’s gone. It’s old news.»

Advertisement

When asked why Western Europe has been lagging on defense spending years after Russia seized 20% of Ukraine, Šakalienė replied, «I think that a very large part of the democratic world got caught up in this illusion of an idealistic world, which has never existed.»

She said part of the illusion was believing wars are over. Russia never thought this way, she explained.

«The non-democratic part of the world has not changed. They are actually playing by their rules. So if they are not playing by our rules, our blindness is what put us in this dangerous position.»

Advertisement

TRUMP THREATENS SANCTIONS ON RUSSIA, DEMANDS PEACE AFTER MAJOR HITS IN UKRAINE

Russian President Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping shaking hands.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, and Chinese President Xi Jinping shake hands at the BRICS Summit in Kazan, Tatarstan Republic, Russia. (Contributor/Getty Images)

Šakalienė is the only NATO defense minister sanctioned by China. When asked about Beijing’s motives in supporting Russia, her answer might surprise some people.

«Russia is able to boost its military production so efficiently because China is feeding it,» she said.  «It is useful for China to have this war of exhaustion, and also it is useful for China, even though it supplies Russia, to see Russia also lose a lot of its soldiers – a lot of its weapons and equipment – because a weaker Russia is more convenient to China.»

Advertisement

Despite heavy battlefield losses in Ukraine over the past three years, Russia is building an army of 1.5 million soldiers, according to Šakalienė, who warned Putin has «more imperial expansion plans in his hand.»

When Fox News sat down at the Lithuanian Embassy on Friday, Trump was trying to secure a mineral rights agreement with Ukraine and eventually hopes to seek a ceasefire agreement with Russia.

«If Russia violates the ceasefire, the response must be immediate and violent,» Šakalienė urged.

Advertisement

When asked for her reaction to a report that Trump is considering not defending NATO allies who do not spend enough on defense, Šakalienė applauded the harsh rhetoric from Trump, calling it «painful» but justified. «Everyone needs to contribute, burden sharing is the main rule if you really want to have a strong alliance.»

She pointed to the Baltic States and Poland as leading NATO members in defense spending as a percentage of GDP.

Last year, the European Union, which Lithuania is a member, spent more on Russian oil and gas than aid to Ukraine. Šakalienė said her country was «the first one to cut off» Russian oil and gas. «We were even supporting our neighbors, Latvians and Polish with energy supplies. So for us, being independent of Russian energy is a matter of life and death.»

Advertisement

Lithuania’s first LNG terminal was aptly named «Independence,» according to Frank Fannon, who served in Trump’s first term as assistant secretary of state for energy resources.

When Fox News sat down at the embassy, Lithuania had just announced it would be withdrawing from the convention on cluster munitions, an international agreement by more than 100 nations prohibiting cluster bombs. Šakalienė explained why Lithuania is pulling out.

«We want to be ready to use anything and everything necessary to protect our borders. We don’t want Russians to come to our homes again. We want to send a strategic message, a very clear message, that we will do anything to protect ourselves.»  

Advertisement

RUSSIAN MISSILE EXPERTS VISITED IRAN AMID GROWING MILITARY TIES

Dovilė Šakalienė giving a speech.

Minister of Defense of the Republic of Lithuania Dovilė Šakalienė at a press conference. (Jörg Carstensen/picture alliance via Getty Images)

Lithuania, along with other European nations, also wants to withdraw from another treaty soon known as the Ottawa Convention, which bans anti-personnel land mines.

«This is a terrible weapon, just like cluster munitions, but the Russians are using the weapons, including forbidden weapons. So we want to send the message back,» she said.

Advertisement

In addition to Russia, China and the United States are also not parties to the agreement. In 2014, the United States announced it would abide by the Ottawa Convention, except for the landmines already deployed on the Korean Peninsula.

Šakalienė, a deeply devout Christian, said Russia is not only attacking Ukraine, but the Christian faith as well.

«It was Soviet Russia that tried to annihilate the church in Ukraine, in Lithuania, in Poland. They have now sort of revived their Christianity and are using it for KGB infiltration, for FSB infiltration, she said. «This is a betrayal.»

Advertisement

She continued, «When we see how churches in Ukraine are being bombed, being robbed…the Christian community in Ukraine is being murdered and their beautiful heritage is being destroyed.»

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The Lithuanian defense minister ended the interview with a final warning.

Advertisement

«We tend to try to diminish our enemies. This is a mistake. You have to see them for what they are.»


Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

New study shuts down ICC charges against Israel over Gaza starvation claims

Published

on


A newly released study is challenging the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) investigation of starvation claims against Israel and exposes the Hamas terror organization’s role in controlling aid distribution. 

Just last week, as a result of Hamas terrorists’ refusal to extend the ceasefire deal and start releasing the 59 hostages still held in Gaza, the Israeli government decided to halt all goods and supplies going into Gaza. 

Advertisement

Yet despite howls of criticism from U.N. relief chief Tom Fletcher, who called the decision «alarming,» the Trump administration has given its blessing to the move. 

Retired Lt. Col. Jonathan Conricus, a former IDF international spokesperson and now a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, dismissed claims of starvation, telling Fox News Digital that Hamas hoards supplies while Israel ensures aid enters. «Over 25,200 trucks arrived during the ceasefire – enough for four months. If there’s hunger, it’s because of Hamas corruption, not a lack of food,» he said.

The study published by Israeli public health experts, based on data from Israel’s Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT), challenges these claims, showing no evidence of famine or intentional deprivation.

Advertisement

MORE AID IS SUPPOSED TO BE ENTERING THE GAZA STRIP. WHY ISN’T IT HELPING?

The market in Deir al-Balah in the center of the Gaza Strip is teeming with vendors and shoppers.  (Majdi Fathi/TPS)

The study, named «Food supplied to Gaza during seven months of the Hamas-Israel war,» was led by nutrition and public health experts Aron Troen and Ronit Endevelt, along with researchers from multiple Israeli universities and the Ministry of Health. The study analyzed food shipments into Gaza from January to July 2024. 

Advertisement

Using international food composition databases and the Sphere humanitarian standards, they tracked calorie intake, nutritional value, and humanitarian aid efforts, providing an objective, data-driven analysis of food supplies delivered to Gaza during the first seven months of the war.

The research assessed food shipments from international donors processed through COGAT. Each item was categorized based on its energy content, protein, fat and micronutrient composition. The total nutritional supply per capita was then measured against international benchmarks to ensure accuracy.

hamas fighters in gaza

Hamas terrorists stand in formation as Palestinians gather on a street to watch the handover of three Israeli hostages to a Red Cross team in Deir el-Balah, central Gaza, on Feb. 8, 2025. (Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

«We didn’t enter politics,» said professor Ronit Endevelt. «We just wanted to know if, from a nutritional perspective, the food entering Gaza was sufficient. We double-checked our data multiple times to avoid exaggeration.»

Advertisement

Between January and April 2024, 14,916 trucks carrying 227,854 tons of food entered Gaza, averaging 124 food trucks per day. The study found that the daily per capita caloric supply averaged 3,374 kcal, with 101 grams of protein and 80.6 grams of fat – meeting or exceeding international humanitarian food aid standards.

ICC REJECTS ISRAELI APPEALS, ISSUES ARREST WARRANTS FOR BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, YOAV GALLANT

«In March 2024, the United Nations Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) warned of imminent famine in Gaza. Within days, cautious technical language gave way to media headlines and political statements claiming mass starvation was already underway,» professor Troen told Fox News Digital. 

Advertisement

«One of the most persistent falsehoods has been the claim that before the war, 500 or more humanitarian trucks entered Gaza daily, and that this number was necessary to meet the population’s needs. In reality, the number of food trucks was around or fewer than 100 per day before the war, and has since increased substantially,» he continued. «Our study aimed to address that gap by analyzing verified food shipments. The numbers show that while there were variations, at no point did the food supply drop to starvation levels.»

The market in Deir al-Balah, Gaza.

A poultry stall in the market in Deir al Balah in the center of the Gaza Strip. (Majdi Fathi/TPS-IL)

When asked specifically about testimonies obtained by Fox News Digital from Gazans who reported struggling to find food on certain days, Endevelt acknowledged the study did not track final distribution within Gaza. «We can’t say there was no hunger, but we can confirm enough food entered,» she said. «Most of the time, in most months, there was enough food available.»

A key finding of the study is the distinction between food supply and distribution. «Hamas systematically weaponized food distribution, using it as a tool of control,» said Endevelt. «Aid often didn’t reach those in need because Hamas seized supplies, sold them on the black market, or prioritized its own fighters. Reports of famine are not due to a lack of aid but Hamas’ deliberate strategy of restricting access to maintain power and profit.»

Advertisement

Despite these findings, the ICC investigation and global criticism continued. «IPC reports, widely cited as evidence against Israel, failed to mention Hamas’ role in manipulating aid,» Troen said.

When asked by Fox News Digital whether the new findings would be considered in its investigation, the ICC Office of the Prosecutor responded: «The ICC Office of the Prosecutor has a current and ongoing investigation in relation to the Situation in the State of Palestine. The Office’s investigations are built from a wide range of sources. They can encompass Article 15 communications, information from states, international partners, and civil society, publicly available sources of information, and the direct collection of evidence by the Office, including interviews with witnesses.

Aid going into gaza

Aid is delivered from Israel to Gaza. (IDF Spokesman’s Unit)

«The Office is unable to provide further information with respect to details of its investigative activities in response to your request at this stage. Confidentiality is a crucial part of our work and is essential to protect the integrity of the investigations and to ensure the safety and security of victims, witnesses, and all those with whom the Office interacts.»

Advertisement

The U.N. spokesman referred Fox News Digital to the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), which requested more time to respond. However, even after the extension was granted, no response was provided.

UN SILENT AS GUTERRES CALLS FOR HOSTAGE RELEASE, RECEIVES ‘THUNDEROUS’ APPLAUSE ON GAZA

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan

Publishing the study posed challenges. «Given the anti-Israel bias in parts of the scientific community, we opted to submit to the Israeli Journal of Health Policy Research, a peer-reviewed journal under Springer Nature,» Troen said. «We wanted the data available quickly to improve humanitarian efforts. However, the political climate made the review process unusually intense.»

Advertisement

«This was one of the most rigorously reviewed studies I’ve ever worked on,» Endevelt added. «We had five reviewers, far more than usual, and months of back-and-forth revisions to ensure absolute accuracy.»

The research team, including experts from Hebrew University, Ben-Gurion University, Tel Aviv University and Haifa University, conducted the study with a commitment to scientific rigor. The paper, now widely cited, underscores the importance of transparent data in evaluating humanitarian crises.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«One thing is clear: given the amount of food entering Gaza and ongoing reports of hunger, distribution must be improved,» Troen concluded. «Effective cooperation between U.N. agencies, COGAT, and Palestinian civil society, without Hamas’ interference, is crucial to ensuring aid reaches those who need it most.»


Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Romania blocks frontrunner from postponed presidential race

Published

on


Romania’s central election authority has banned Calin Georgescu, a populist candidate and frontrunner, from running in May’s presidential election re-run.

«Europe is now a dictatorship, Romania is under tyranny!» Georgescu said in a post on X, following the decision. «I have one message left! If democracy in Romania falls, the entire democratic world will fall!»

Advertisement

Trump’s administration has taken an interest in Romania’s presidential election since it was canceled in May because of Russian collusion allegations in Georgescu’s favor. 

SpaceX CEO and DOGE leader Elon Musk chimed in and shared his reaction to the decision.

ROMANIAN FAR-RIGHT PRESIDENTIAL FRONTRUNNER TAKEN INTO CUSTODY AFTER JD VANCE’S REBUKE OF EUROPEAN ELECTIONS

Advertisement

Calin Georgescu, the winner of Romania’s first round of presidential election, annulled by the Constitutional Court, uses crutches walking between supporters gathered for a protest outside the Romanian parliament in Bucharest, Romania, Saturday, Feb. 22, 2025.  (AP Photo/Alexandru Dobre, File)

«This is crazy,» Musk wrote on X.

Kari Lake, Trump administration senior advisor for the US agency for global media, also reacted and compared what is happening in Romania to what «they tried with Trump here in America.»

Advertisement

«Do you love your country & want to put it first?» Lake posted on X. «Then, the Globalists want you removed from the ballot & silenced. They tried it with Trump here in America. They did it to Bolsanaro in Brazil. Now, they’re doing it to Georgescu in Romania. The people should dictate their country’s future. Not the international order & their captured court.»

Georgescu, who won the first round of Romania’s canceled presidential election last year, was taken into custody for questioning by the country’s top prosecutors back in February.

ROMANIA ANNULS FIRST ROUND OF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE WON BY FAR-RIGHT CANDIDATE

Advertisement
Romanian presidential candidate Calin Georgescu sits at a desk.

Calin Georgescu, the independent candidate for presidency who won the first round of presidential elections, speaks after an interview with the Associated Press in Izvorani, Romania, Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2024. (AP Photo/Vadim Ghirda)

Romania’s Constitutional Court made the unprecedented move to annul the election two days ahead of the Dec. 8 runoff after Georgescu’s first-round win. He had polled in single digits and declared zero campaign spending, according to The Associated Press. Allegations of Russian interference and electoral violations quickly emerged. After the election cancelation, prosecutors launched an investigation into alleged campaign funding fraud, as well as alleged antisemitism and hate speech. 

The Trump administration has criticized Romania for canceling last year’s presidential election, with Vice President JD Vance alleging that the court’s ruling was based on «flimsy suspicions» and «enormous pressure» from Romania’s neighbors.

Vance and Georgescu cropped side by side

JD Vance and Romania presidential frontrunner Georgescu. (Getty Images)

Vance said in December, «Romania straight up canceled the results of a presidential election based on the flimsy suspicions of an intelligence agency and enormous pressure from its continental neighbors.» 

Advertisement

He also warned European leaders that they cannot win a «democratic mandate» by «censoring your opponents or putting them in jail,» nor by «disregarding your basic electorate on questions like who gets to be a part of our shared society.» 

«To many of us on the other side of the Atlantic, it looks more and more like old, entrenched interests hiding behind ugly Soviet-era words like misinformation and disinformation, who simply don’t like the idea that somebody with an alternative viewpoint might express a different opinion or, God forbid, vote a different way, or even worse, win an election,» Vance said. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Georgescu, a staunch critic of NATO and Western support for Ukraine, has sparked controversy in the past for describing Romanian fascist and nationalist leaders from the 1930s and 1940s as national heroes, according to The AP. 

He has also praised Russian President Vladimir Putin in the past as «a man who loves his country,» and has called Ukraine «an invented state.»

Fox News Digital’s Danielle Wallace, Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Advertisement

Stepheny Price is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business. She covers topics including missing persons, homicides, national crime cases, illegal immigration, and more. Story tips and ideas can be sent to stepheny.price@fox.com


Advertisement
Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias

Copyright © 2025 NDM - Noticias del Momento | #Noticias #Chimentos #Política #Fútbol #Economía #Sociedad