Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

UK bans ninja swords in move to crack down on violent knife crime

Published

on


Brits have until Aug. 1 to get rid of all their ninja swords as the U.K.’s Labour government looks to crack down on knife crime.

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced Thursday that «ninja swords» specifically will be banned this summer after the 2022 murder of 16-year-old Ronan Kanda, who was stabbed to death by a ninja sword just outside his home. 

Advertisement

«Confirmed: Ninja swords will be banned by this summer,» Starmer said in a post on X. «When we promise action we take it.»

UK STABBING SUSPECT IN DEATHS OF 3 GIRLS FOUND WITH RICIN, AL QAEDA MATERIAL AND CHARGED UNDER TERRORISM ACT

An activist wearing a T-shirt with the slogan «Put Knives Down!» stands in front of pictures of victims of knife crime during a demonstration outside New Scotland Yard.  (Vuk Valcic/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

Advertisement

The new ban, «Ronan’s Law,» will now make it illegal to possess, sell, make or import ninja swords.

«Since losing our beautiful boy Ronan, we have relentlessly campaigned for a ban on ninja swords, the lethal weapon which took his life,» Pooja Kanda, the mother to the 16-year-old boy, said, according to a government readout. «We believe ninja swords have no place in our society other than to seriously harm and kill.

«Each step towards tackling knife crime is a step towards getting justice for our boy Ronan.» 

Advertisement

UK STABBING SPREE LEAVES 2 KIDS DEAD, 9 OTHERS INJURED AT TAYLOR SWIFT-THEMED EVENT: ‘DEEPLY SHOCKING’

The British government has set up a surrender process for any owner of a ninja sword, defined as a blade between 14 inches and 24 inches «with one straight cutting edge with a tanto-style point.»

«From 1 August, anyone caught in possession of a ninja sword in private could face 6 months in prison, and this will later increase to 2 years under new measures in the Crime and Policing Bill,» the government said in a statement. «There is already a penalty of up to 4 years in prison for carrying any weapon in public.»  

Advertisement

Knife crime has long plagued the U.K. and though offenses involving a «sharp instrument» committed last year across England and Wales were down from a 15-year peak in 2019, they were still substantially higher than crimes reported in 2010, when 33,800 crimes were reported, versus the 50,500 cases in 2024.

UK knife crime crackdown

A person views knives available to purchase via an online website.  (Yui Mok/PA Images via Getty Images)

A sharp instrument, according to the U.K., could include knives, but it could also include the use of a broken bottle to commit an offense.

The U.K. saw a significant drop from the 52,000 cases involving a «sharp instrument» reported in 2019 by the following year with 41,700 cases reported.

Advertisement

But these incidents have continued to increase each year since. 

Nearly two dozen different types of knives are already banned in the UK, including swords that are not a part of a national uniform, switch blades, zombie knives, belt buckle knives or butterfly knives, to name a few. 

Knives that are permitted are those used for cooking or while working and have a cutting edge of no more than three inches. 

Advertisement

Though the government states that «it’s illegal to use any knife or weapon in a threatening way.»

Under Ronan’s Law, jail sentences were also increased for selling knives to minors and the illegal sale of banned knives.

UK police investigate knife crime

An officer outside All Saints Catholic High School on Granville Road in Sheffield, South Yorkshire, after a 15-year-old boy died in a stabbing at the school Feb. 3, 2025. (Danny Lawson/PA Images via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«Knife crime is destroying young lives as too many teenagers are being drawn into violence, and it is far too easy for them to get hold of dangerous weapons,» Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said in a statement. «Ronan Kanda was just 16 when he was ruthlessly killed by two boys only a year older than him.

«We are acting with urgency to bring forward measures to prevent deadly weapons from getting into the wrong hands and will continue to do whatever is needed to prevent young people being killed on our streets as part of our mission to halve knife crime over the next decade.» 

Advertisement


Advertisement
Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Estados Unidos realizó un ataque contra una lancha narco en el Caribe: tres muertos

Published

on


Las fuerzas armadas de Estados Unidos informaron el viernes por la noche que realizaron un ataque a una embarcación vinculada al narcotráfico en aguas internacionales del Caribe, cerca de Venezuela, en un operativo que dejó tres presuntos narcotraficantes muertos.

Según informó el Comando Sur de Estados Unidos (SOUTHCOM) a través de su cuenta oficial de X, la acción se realizó en una ruta identificada como frecuentemente utilizada por el crimen organizado. Ningún miembro de las fuerzas militares estadounidenses resultó herido“, resaltó en el comunicado.

Advertisement

Esta semana, bajo el mando del nuevo comandante Francis Donovan, la Fuerza de Tarea “Laza del Sur” intensificó sus acciones, con tres ataques recientes en la zona.

Los operativos cerca de Venezuela continúan, mientras en paralelo Trump el analiza desde Washington al gobierno interino liderado por la presidenta encargada Delcy Rodríguez.

La reciente acción militar de Estados Unidos se enmarca en el plan Lanza del Sur, una estrategia implementada por la administración del presidente Donald Trump desde septiembre del año pasado para combatir el narcotráfico en el Caribe y el Pacífico. Desde el inicio de la campaña, Estados Unidos realizó más de 37 ataques contra embarcaciones sospechosas en aguas internacionales.

Advertisement
El presidente de los Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, observa mientras participa en una llamada con militares del Ejército de los Estados Unidos (REUTERS/Anna Rose Layden/Archivo)

Según el Comando Sur, hasta finales de enero el número de muertos por los bombardeos a botes vinculados al tráfico de drogas ascendía a 128, incluyendo tanto víctimas directas como personas desaparecidas y presumiblemente fallecidas en el mar. El Pentágono detalló que 118 personas murieron de inmediato y otras diez no fueron localizadas tras saltar al agua o no ser rescatadas.

Este último ataque es el quinto que se realiza tras la captura del ex dictador venezolano Nicolás Maduro, quien fue detenido durante una operación estadounidense en Caracas el 3 de enero y posteriormente trasladado a Nueva York para enfrentar cargos por narcotráfico.

La campaña militar arrancó con el despliegue de buques y aeronaves en la región y forma parte de la presión de Washington sobre Venezuela y Colombia para combatir a los cárteles, calificados por la Casa Blanca como “narcoterroristas”.

Advertisement

El viernes, el mandatario estadounidense destacó que ante tropas en Carolina del Norte el éxito de la operación militar que culminó el 3 de enero con la captura del ex líder del régimen venezolano.

Durante su discurso en la base de Fort Bragg, Trump calificó la acción como una demostración del poderío y la precisión de las fuerzas especiales estadounidenses y mencionó que la maniobra en Fuerte Tiuna, Caracas, se ejecutó “literalmente, en un minuto” con el despliegue de varios helicópteros de ataque y transporte.

El presidente venezolano capturado, Nicolás
El presidente venezolano capturado, Nicolás Maduro, es escoltado mientras se dirige al Tribunal de los Estados Unidos Daniel Patrick Moynihan en Manhattan para una comparecencia inicial para enfrentar los cargos federales de EE. UU. que incluyen narcoterrorismo, conspiración, tráfico de drogas, lavado de dinero y otros, en el helipuerto del centro de Manhattan, en la ciudad de Nueva York (REUTERS/Adam Gray/Archivo)

Trump relató que, tras la incursión, tanto Maduro como la ex primera dama Cilia Flores fueron trasladados de inmediato a una prisión federal en Nueva York, donde permanecen a la espera de juicio por cargos de narcoterrorismo y conspiración.

El inquilino de la Casa Blanca resaltó que los soldados debieron superar estrictas medidas de seguridad: “Tuvieron que atravesar puertas de acero. El acero era como papel maché”, afirmó, aludiendo a la facilidad con que los equipos estadounidenses superaron las defensas venezolanas.

Advertisement

En su intervención, Trump también mencionó el uso de un sistema armamentístico secreto denominado “descombobulador”, que, según explicó, fue crucial para inutilizar los sistemas de defensa rusos y chinos presentes en Venezuela. “El equipo ruso no funcionó. El equipo chino no funcionó. Todos intentan averiguar por qué no funcionó. Algún día lo descubrirán, pero no funcionó”, declaró, sugiriendo la efectividad de la tecnología militar estadounidense en el asalto. El presidente concluyó afirmando que “es agradable poder volar sin que te disparen”, en referencia a la superioridad tecnológica empleada durante la operación.

Anteriormente, el Foro Económico Mundial de Davos, Trump defendió la política de ataques en aguas internacionales del Caribe y afirmó que “se logró detener casi el 100% de las drogas que entran por vía marítima”, calificando la ofensiva como una “escalada necesaria” para frenar el tráfico y asegurando: “Estamos en conflicto armado con los cárteles”.



Domestic,Politics,North America,Government / Politics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump ousts judge-installed prosecutor; constitutional expert says Article II leaves no doubt

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump has the constitutional authority to fire court-appointed U.S. attorneys, even if judges legally appointed them, according to former Justice Department official John Yoo, who said the Constitution gives the president broad removal power over executive branch officers.

Advertisement

«Otherwise, you could have U.S. attorneys who are enforcing federal law differently than the president would, and it’s the president who all of us in the country elect and to whom the president is accountable,» Yoo told Fox News Digital in an interview.

Trump exercised that power this week by terminating Donald Kinsella just hours after federal judges in the Northern District of New York voted to install him to fill the vacancy left by Trump appointee John Sarcone, whose temporary term had expired. 

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche revealed the move in a fiery social media post, declaring that judges «don’t pick» U.S. attorneys and thrusting the fight deeper into a constitutional dispute over who ultimately controls them.

Advertisement

FEDERAL JUDGE DISQUALIFIES US ATTORNEY, TOSSES SUBPOENAS TARGETING NY AG LETITIA JAMES

Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks alongside President Donald Trump on recent Supreme Court rulings in the briefing room at the White House June 27, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

At the center of the most recent dispute is a law that allows federal courts to appoint temporary U.S. attorneys when a presidential nominee has not been confirmed by the Senate and an acting official’s term has expired. Blanche suggested the court’s move to fill a U.S. attorney vacancy was unconstitutional, a comment that comes as the DOJ appeals Judge Lorna Schofield’s decision last month to disqualify Sarcone over his expired tenure.

Advertisement

But Yoo, a law professor at University of California, Berkeley, said both that the judges’ actions were legal due to a «quirk» in the law and that the president still has authority to fire Kinsella.

«No matter how an executive officer is appointed … none of these positions under the Constitution have any specific way to remove the officers, and so the president can remove all officers in the executive branch, particularly all officers in the Justice Department,» Yoo said.

Yoo said the Constitution lays out detailed processes for appointing U.S. attorneys but is «silent» on how they are removed.

Advertisement

«It has elaborate procedures … about how you appoint them to office. It doesn’t actually discuss at all how you remove them from office,» Yoo said, referencing the complex federal vacancy laws that govern how interim and acting U.S. attorneys are appointed.

John Sarcone III

John A. Sarcone III April 28, 2025, in the U.S. Attorney’s Office at the James T. Foley Federal Courthouse in Albany, N.Y.  (Will Waldron/Albany Times Union via Getty Images)

He noted that existing law and Supreme Court precedent have long given the president the ultimate power to fire inferior officers in the executive branch, meaning an official like the attorney general cannot remove the appointees chosen by the courts, such as Kinsella, but Trump can.

Kinsella did not respond to a request for comment on his termination.

Advertisement

Under the law, U.S. attorneys are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. But if the Senate does not act, the president can install a temporary U.S. attorney for a limited period, typically 120 days. If that term expires without confirmation of a nominee, the law gives the district court’s judges the power to appoint a replacement to avoid a vacancy in the office.

FORMER TRUMP LAWYER HALLIGAN DEFENDS US PROSECUTOR STATUS IN WAKE OF COMEY, JAMES DISMISSALS

Trump, for his part, has struggled to secure Senate confirmations of his U.S. attorney nominees in blue states, where the upper chamber’s blue slip tradition has meant that home state senators must greenlight his nominees. 

Advertisement

His interim appointees in these states, including New York, California, Nevada, New Jersey and Virginia, have faced legal setbacks as federal judges have uniformly found that Trump cannot repeatedly reappoint the same person to consecutive temporary terms.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has ruled out approving any of Trump’s nominees in New York, for example. After Trump fired Kinsella, a veteran federal prosecutor, Schumer said in a statement the president wanted an unqualified «political loyalist» in office. 

Acting US Attorney Alina Habba of New Jersey

Alina Habba speaks to members of the media outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, D.C., March 24, 2025. (Samuel Corum/Sipa/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

«Everyone knows Trump only cares about one quality in a U.S. Attorney — complete political subservience,» Schumer said.

Advertisement

In New Jersey, Trump quickly fired a court-appointed U.S. attorney after a lower court found Alina Habba’s temporary term had expired. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit upheld the lower court’s finding that Habba was unlawfully serving.

In the Eastern District of Virginia, the top prosecutor’s role also remains in limbo as the DOJ appeals a judge’s decision to disqualify Lindsey Halligan, who brought high-profile indictments against New York Attorney General Letitia James and former FBI Director James Comey. The judge tossed those cases, finding Halligan was improperly appointed.

The Trump DOJ used a variety of loopholes in the law to install Sarcone, Habba, Halligan and others, and has argued in appeals that the judges disqualifying them — and replacing them with U.S. attorneys of the court’s choosing — were misreading the law.

Advertisement

«It is important that a DOJ component is overseen by someone who has the support of the Executive Branch, and that a U.S. Attorney’s Office can continue to function even when there is no Senate-confirmed or interim U.S. Attorney,» DOJ attorneys wrote in court papers in Habba’s case.

Yoo signaled that the courts were right to honor the statutory time constraints on acting and interm tenures, but he reiterated that Trump had sole removal power.

From the founding, he said, officers who enforce federal law have been removable at will by the president under Article II of the Constitution and the take care clause, the duty to «take care that the laws be faithfully executed.»

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«Any subordinates who are carrying out federal law have to be accountable to him,» Yoo said.

The DOJ has not at this stage elevated any of the U.S. attorney cases to the Supreme Court. Habba’s case is the furthest along, and a spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment on whether the DOJ would appeal that decision.

Advertisement

justice department,donald trump,federal judges,new york,senate

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Terror convict, recently released, shot dead by Paris police after alleged knife attack near Arc de Triomphe

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A man who had recently been released from prison on a terrorism charge was shot and killed by a police officer after he allegedly tried to attack another officer with a knife and scissors near the Arc de Triomphe in Paris Friday.

Advertisement

The incident happened near the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at the ceremony for relighting the eternal flame, which is carried out nightly.

The unidentified man, who is a French national born in 1978, allegedly tried to attack an officer guarding the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier and was shot by another officer.

He died of his wounds at a hospital, the French counterterrorism prosecutor’s office said.

Advertisement

GENEOLOGY COMPANY EXEC SLAMS PIMA SHERIFF’S ‘DEVASTATING’ MOVE TO SHIP NANCY GUTHRIE EVIDENCE TO FLORIDA LAB

French police stand in front of the Arc de Triomphe Friday night after a man allegedly tried to attack an officer with a knife.  (Guillaume Baptiste/AFP via Getty Images)

He was sentenced to 17 years in prison in Brussels in 2013 on a terrorist-related offense of attempted murder of three police officers in Belgium and had just been released in December.

Advertisement

The man served 12 years in prison and was placed under police supervision with routine checks, the French prosecution office said.

VIDEO SHOWS THE ‘HEIST OF THE CENTURY’ AT THE LOUVRE

The French counterterrorism prosecutor’s office said it had opened an investigation into the man related to his ties to a «terrorist enterprise» before his death.

Advertisement
France's Tomb of the Unknown Soldier

French President Emmanuel Macron visiting the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in Arc de Triomphe in 2021.  ( Ludovic Marin/Pool via Reuters)

The man was held in a Belgian prison until 2015, when he was transferred to France and released on Christmas Eve.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The Arc de Triomphe was closed to guests after the incident, which had no other reported injuries.

Advertisement
the Arc de Triomphe with police around it

The man was killed in the incident.  (AP Photo/Emma Da Silva, File)

The Arc de Triomphe, at the end of the Champs-Élysées, is one of Paris and Europe’s most popular sights, and millions of tourists visit the monument in the heart of the French capital each year.

Reuters and the Associated Press contributed to this report. 



france,crime,terrorism

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias