Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Americans could pay to bring back alleged members of ‘foreign terrorist cartel’ to US

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Alleged members of «foreign terrorist cartel» Tren de Aragua are set to be brought back to the U.S. after their deportations in 2025 — and it could come at taxpayers’ expense.

Advertisement

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, who has repeatedly butted heads with the Trump administration, ordered the Trump administration on Thursday to facilitate the return of 137 migrants deported to a notorious prison in El Salvador in 2025, called CECOT. 

Boasberg stipulated in his ruling that the government pay for the migrants’ airfare back to the U.S., meaning taxpayers are likely footing the bill. 

Boasberg argued that it’s «unclear why Plaintiffs should bear the financial cost of their return in such an instance,» noting that, «this situation would never have arisen had the Government simply afforded Plaintiffs their constitutional rights before initially deporting them.»

Advertisement

FEDERAL JUDGE ORDERS DEPORTED VENEZUELANS TO BE RETURNED TO US

Courts rejected a misconduct accusation against Judge James Boasberg. (Associated Press)

The ruling comes as part of a nearly year-long saga, when the federal judge attempted to halt the Trump administration’s deportations of migrants to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act in March 2025. 

Advertisement

The Supreme Court ultimately allowed the Trump administration to continue using the Alien Enemies Act to carry out deportations in April, but ordered that detainees receive notice and an opportunity to challenge allegations.

Boasberg has since been wading through legal avenues with the men in El Salvador, issuing a ruling in December that the Trump administration denied them their due process. 

It is unclear how many of the men will actually take the offer and return to the U.S., with Boasberg noting that the noncitizens «would be detained upon arrival» back to the U.S. 

Advertisement

Similar to Boasberg’s ruling, another federal judge this month ordered the Trump administration to pay for the return of three migrant families that the judge ruled ICE unlawfully deported by a 2023 humanitarian-parole settlement. 

TRUMP ADMIN ASKS BOASBERG FOR MORE TIME TO DETAIL CECOT PLANS AFTER MADURO OUSTER

CECOT prison

A prisoner is moved as Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem tours the Terrorist Confinement Center (CECOT) on March 26, 2025 in Tecoluca, El Salvador.  (Alex Brandon-Pool/Getty Images)

DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told Fox News Digital on Thursday in response to the ruling that the illegal aliens in El Salvador were removed under proper legal authority, before taking a shot as Boasberg. 

Advertisement

«Nothing has changed; in addition to being in our country illegally, these aliens are foreign terrorists designated as alien enemies by the President,» DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told Fox News Digital when asked about the ruling. 

TRUMP ADMIN SAYS MADURO CAPTURE REINFORCES ALIEN ENEMIES ACT REMOVALS

«They were removed under the proper legal authorities. This case is no longer about the facts or law, but about Judge Boasberg’s crusade to stop President Trump from doing the will of the American People. He has been shut down by appellate courts again and again on this case,» she continued. 

Advertisement

Boasberg has become a prime target for Republicans over a string of rulings tied to Trump-era policies — including the Trump administration backing a potential judicial impeachment of the judge, and other «rogue» judges, in January. 

DHS assistant secretary for public affairs Tricia McLaughlin

DHS assistant secretary for public affairs Tricia McLaughlin (dhs.gov)

The migrants in El Salvador were removed under The Alien Enemies Act, which is a 1798 wartime immigration law that the Trump administration invoked to deport violent gang members with alleged ties to criminal organizations, such as Tren de Aragua (TdA). 

TdA, as well as MS-13, were additionally designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations by the Trump administration’s State Department in February 2025. 

Advertisement

The administration has described those deported to the notoriously secure prison in El Salvador as «violent savages» and terrorists who pose a threat to U.S. security. 

CECOT prison

A prisoner is moved as Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem tours the Terrorist Confinement Center (CECOT) on March 26, 2025 in Tecoluca, El Salvador.  (Alex Brandon-Pool/Getty Images)

A previous analysis of 238 migrants deported to El Salvador found six faced attempted murder, assault, armed robbery, gun possession or domestic battery charges in the U.S., the Texas Tribune reported in May 2025, while 32 other deportees had been convicted in the U.S. of crimes, many of which were nonviolent, according to the outlet.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

Advertisement

DHS has defended that deportees labeled «‘non-criminals» by the media are «terrorists, human rights abusers, gang members and more — they just don’t have a rap sheet in the U.S.» 

immigration,illegal immigrants,homeland security,donald trump,politics

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Estados Unidos: Donald Trump estableció que los gases de efecto invernadero no dañan la salud y eliminó regulaciones ambientales

Published

on


El presidente Donald Trump revirtió este jueves una decisión científica clave de la era Obama, que sustentó las políticas federales para frenar el calentamiento global: en una medida calificada como la “mayor desregulación en la historia de Estados Unidos”, el jefe de la Casa Blanca estableció que los gases de efecto invernadero no son una amenaza para la salud pública

En lo que se llamó «hallazgo de peligro», los científicos advirtieron en 2009 que una variedad de gases de efecto invernadero representaba una amenaza para la salud pública y eso se convirtió en la base legal de los esfuerzos federales para controlar las emisiones, especialmente en los vehículos.

Advertisement

La medida anunciada por Trump este jueves es un paso clave para eliminar los límites al dióxido de carbono, el metano y otros cuatro gases que, según los científicos, están alimentando las olas de calor, sequías, incendios forestales y otros fenómenos meteorológicos extremos.

Al eliminar esta política, el gobierno buscará eliminar los límites de emisiones de coches, centrales eléctricas y otras industrias que liberan la gran mayoría de la contaminación que calienta el planeta.

La Casa Blanca dijo que la iniciativa haría bajar el precio de los automóviles, reduciendo los costos para los fabricantes en unos 2.400 dólares por vehículo.

Advertisement

Los grupos ecologistas afirman que esta medida es, por lejos, la reversión más significativa del cambio climático intentada hasta ahora y buscan impugnarla en los tribunales.

Trump ya había anticipado que se analizaba esta iniciativa. El siempre se ha referido al cambio climático como un «engaño» y señala básicamente que la gran mayoría de los científicos en todo el mundo están equivocados y que un planeta más caliente no es la amenaza que muestran décadas de investigación.

La decisión de Trump rechaza hechos que durante décadas habían sido aceptados por presidentes de ambos partidos, incluyendo a Richard Nixon, cuyo principal asesor advirtió sobre los peligros del cambio climático, y al primer presidente, George Bush, que firmó un tratado internacional sobre el clima.

Advertisement

«Esto es lo más grande que se puede hacer», dijo el presidente Trump en la Casa Blanca mientras un sonriente Lee Zeldin, el administrador de la Agencia de Protección Ambiental (EPA, por sus siglas en inglés), permanecía a su lado. «Oficialmente ponemos fin a la llamada ‘hallazgo de peligro’, una política desastrosa de la era Obama», afirmó.

Trump la calificó de «regla radical» que se convirtió en «la base para el Nuevo Escándalo Verde», una etiqueta que el presidente da a cualquier esfuerzo por frenar emisiones o desarrollar energías renovables.

Zeldin la calificó como «la mayor acción desreguladora en la historia de Estados Unidos». El gobierno afirma que ahorraría a los fabricantes de automóviles y otras empresas un estimado de 1.000 millones de dólares y ayudará a reducir los costos de la energía y el transporte.

Advertisement

«La determinación sobre el peligro ha servido realmente como la pieza clave de la regulación estadounidense de los gases de efecto invernadero«, dijo Meghan Greenfield, ex abogada de la EPA y del Departamento de Justicia a la BBC.

«Eso incluye vehículos motorizados, pero también plantas eléctricas, el sector del petróleo y gas, metano de vertederos, incluso aviones. Así que realmente abarca todo el espectro, todos los estándares para cada sector se basan en eso,» agregó.

Los funcionarios de Trump insisten en que derogar la regulación ahorrará más de 1.000 millones de dólares y ayudará a reducir el precio de la energía y el transporte.

Advertisement

Muchos ecologistas son escépticos respecto a los posibles ahorros que promociona el equipo de Trump. «Va a obligar a los estadounidenses a gastar más dinero, alrededor de 1.400 millones de dólares en costes adicionales de combustible, para alimentar estos vehículos menos eficientes y más contaminantes», dijo Peter Zalzal del Environmental Defense Fund.

«También hemos analizado los impactos en la salud y hemos encontrado que la acción resultaría en hasta 58.000 muertes prematuras adicionales, 37 millones de ataques de asma más», afirmó.

Los gobernadores demócratas y líderes medioambientales dijeron de inmediato que impugnarían las acciones de la administración en una batalla legal de alto perfil que probablemente llegará al Tribunal Supremo de EE. UU.

Advertisement

«Si esta decisión temeraria sobrevive a los desafíos legales, provocará más incendios forestales mortales, más muertes por calor extremo, más inundaciones y sequías provocadas por el clima, y mayores amenazas para las comunidades en todo el país», dijo el gobernador Gavin Newsom de California en un comunicado. Afirmó que el estado «demandará para impugnar esta acción ilegal» y continuará regulando los gases de efecto invernadero.

«Los veremos en los tribunales y ganaremos», añadió Manish Bapna, presidente del Consejo de Defensa de los Recursos Naturales. «La ciencia y la ley son cristalinas, y la EPA está emitiendo una determinación apresurada, descuidada y no científica que no tiene base legal.»

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Sanctuary policies let alleged child predator roam free until DHS made Portland, Oregon, airport arrest

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FIRST ON FOX: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) arrested an illegal migrant who was charged with rape, purchasing sex with a minor, and sexual abuse in Oregon, after the migrant was released on bail by sanctuary policies.

Advertisement

Manuel Cruz-Ramirez, who still faces the slew of charges, was not referred to immigration officers upon his arrest and release due to Marion County’s sanctuary status. 

The illegal immigrant from Mexico was apprehended only because he was using a fraudulent Mexican passport at the Portland International Airport. TSA and CBP agents were flagged when his falsified name did not return full data, according to DHS.

«Manuel Cruz-Ramirez was arrested for rape, purchasing sex with a minor, and sexual abuse in Oregon,» DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told Fox News Digital. «The state’s sanctuary politicians allowed this pedophile to be released from jail back into American communities.»

Advertisement

An anti-ICE agitator chants and gestures at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility, Jan. 9, in Portland, Ore. (Mathieu Lewis-Rolland/Getty Images)

TRUMP URGES DHS, ICE TO PUBLICIZE ARRESTS, SAYS CRACKDOWN IS ‘SAVING MANY INNOCENT LIVES’

In non-sanctuary cities, Cruz-Ramirez would have referred to immigration officers, who would have apprehended him before he was released from detention. 

Advertisement

«Americans can be proud of the swift actions of TSA and CBP for protecting them and our judicial system by preventing this monster from fleeing the country,» McLaughlin explained. «Criminal illegal aliens should not be released from jails back onto our streets to terrorize more innocent Americans.

«Oregon’s sanctuary politicians must stop this reckless insanity of releasing child predators from jail back into our neighborhoods to prey on more innocent children,» she added.

DHS DEMANDS MN LEADERS HONOR ICE DETAINERS, ALLEGES HUNDREDS OF CRIMINAL ALIENS HAVE BEEN RELEASED UNDER WALZ

Advertisement
Crowd-control weapons are fired as a large group of demonstrators approaches a secured federal facility in Portland.

Federal immigration enforcement officers deploy tear gas as hundreds of anti-ICE agitators march from Portland City Hall to an ICE facility, Feb. 1, in Portland, Ore. (Sean Bascom/Anadolu via Getty Images)

DHS also told Fox News Digital that Cruz-Ramirez had been deported from the U.S. in 2018, though he re-entered the country at an unknown location and time. He is now in ICE custody and his removal order has been re-instated.

Portland has been one of several cities where agitators have mobilized to confront and protest federal law enforcement.

On Thursday, Fox News Digital reported that DHS launched an investigation into an Oregon resident who was arrested during a traffic stop with knives and materials to make Molotov cocktails.

Advertisement

DHS URGES NEWSOM TO HONOR ICE DETAINERS AFTER FEDERAL AGENT ASSAULTED WHILE ARRESTING ILLEGAL ALIEN AT JAIL

The 18-year-old Oregon resident allegedly authored a manifesto with the intention of killing ICE at a Portland ICE office. The individual reportedly told authorities that he was planning on picking up an AR-15 rifle to carry out the attack.

Noem and Trump during election

President Donald Trump has repeatedly backed DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.  (Jim Watson/Getty Images)

Democrats, including those in Congress, have referred to ICE agents as Nazis and gestapo, and the Trump administration has said that such rhetoric is endangering the lives of law enforcement officers across the country.

Advertisement

During an interview with Fox News Digital earlier this month, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem noted the difference between some cities and those which are controlled by far-left leaders, saying that in cities where authorities cooperate with federal law enforcement there is far less conflict. 

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«Minneapolis and St. Paul, the Twin Cities, have an opportunity to do the same thing that Memphis did. There we had a Democrat mayor who worked with us,» Noem told Fox News Digital. «It was about the same size as a city, about the same amount of federal law enforcement officers were there, and we dramatically cut crime and murder rates and partnered well together.»

Advertisement

Fox News’ Andrew Mark Miller contributed to this report.

immigration,illegal immigrants,migrant crime,portland,oregon,kristi noem,homeland security

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

European nation votes to cap population at 10M in major immigration crackdown referendum

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Switzerland is set to vote this summer on a proposal aimed at capping the country’s population at 10 million, the latest effort by the nation’s leading right-wing party to restrict immigration.

Advertisement

The Swiss People’s Party (SVP), which holds the most seats in parliament, announced the referendum on Wednesday after gathering enough support through petition signatures.  

The measure, which will be put on the national ballot on June 14, comes just as the population neared 9.1 million, according to the Federal Statistics Office.

The anti-immigration campaign was proposed as officials noted that foreign-born residents now make up about 27 percent of the population.

Advertisement

DUBLIN PROTESTERS CLASH WITH POLICE, BURN VEHICLE AFTER MIGRANT ACCUSED OF SEXUALLY ASSAULTING IRISH GIRL

Snow covers the hills around Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 19, 2020. (AP Photo/Markus Schreiber, File)

The SVP, which has long sought to curb rising migration, said that more than 1 million immigrants from the European Union (EU) came to Switzerland in 2024.

Advertisement

The party called the situation «uncontrolled immigration,» saying that «the majority of the Swiss population suffers» from increased demand on environmental resources and infrastructure.

«Our small country is bursting at the seams,» the party said. «Nature is being paved over. There are ever more traffic jams on the roads, overburdened public transport, overburdened schools, housing shortage and rising rents, massively increasing crime and exploding costs for Swiss taxpayers.»

STARMER’S DIGITAL ID WORK REQUIREMENT SPARKS UPROAR FROM UK’S LEFT AND RIGHT

Advertisement
crowd holding swiss flags

A massive crowd waves numerous Swiss flags on January 10, 2026, in Adelboden, Switzerland. (Christophe Pallot/Agence Zoom/Getty Images)

If the measure is enshrined into law, both Swiss citizens and foreign residents must not exceed a total population of 10 million before 2050.

If the population reaches 9.5 million before then, the government may take steps to curb growth by introducing measures on asylum and family reunification, noting that many immigrants — primarily Muslim men from North Africa, the Middle East, and Afghanistan — enter through asylum applications.

GREENLAND’S PRIME MINISTER SAYS ‘WE CHOOSE DENMARK’ OVER THE US 

Advertisement

Major Swiss political parties outside the SVP, including centrist, left-leaning and liberal groups, have reportedly rejected the initiative.

Critics cautioned that the passing of such measure could strain Switzerland’s relations with its European neighbors, as most foreign-born residents hail from other EU countries.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement
flags flying outside of building

Flags of the member states of the European Union blow in the wind at dusk in front of the European Parliament on November 27, 2019 in Strasbourg, France. (Thierry Monasse/Getty Images)

In response, the SVP said lawmakers «could not have made it clearer that they don’t care about the concerns of the population, which is increasingly suffering from uncontrolled immigration.»

They also stressed that they do not intend to terminate the «free movement of persons agreement with the EU,» which allows European citizens to move and work freely across borders, and said such cancellation would remain a last resort if the Federal Council fails to limit immigration.

Advertisement



europe,the european union,travel,immigration

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias