INTERNACIONAL
AOC uses House floor speech to smear Charlie Kirk: ‘His rhetoric and beliefs were ignorant, uneducated’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., on Friday opposed a resolution honoring the life and legacy of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated Sept. 10 during a speaking engagement at Utah Valley University.
In a speech on the House floor, Ocasio-Cortez claimed the resolution was introduced on a «purely partisan basis, instead of uniting Congress.»
After condemning Kirk’s murder, she noted the resolution «brings great pain to the millions of Americans who endured segregation, Jim Crow and the legacy of bigotry today» and tore into the late 31-year-old’s ideology.
«We should be clear about who Charlie Kirk was, a man who believed that the Civil Rights Act that granted Black Americans the right to vote was a mistake, who, after the violent attack on Paul Pelosi, claimed that ‘some amazing patriot’ should bail out his brutal assailant and accused Jews of controlling ‘not just the colleges – it’s the nonprofits, it’s the movies, it’s Hollywood, it’s all of it,’» Ocasio-Cortez said.
58 HOUSE DEMS VOTE AGAINST RESOLUTION HONORING ‘LIFE AND LEGACY’ OF CHARLIE KIRK
«His rhetoric and beliefs were ignorant, uneducated and sought to disenfranchise millions of Americans — far from the ‘working tirelessly to promote unity’ as asserted by the majority in this resolution.»
Charlie Kirk, who founded Turning Point USA, was killed Sept. 10 while speaking at an event at Utah Valley University. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
The resolution described Kirk as a «devoted Christian,» «dedicated husband» and a «loving father» of two, explaining his founding of Turning Point USA and commending his personification of the First Amendment.
It resolved the House of Representatives to condemn Kirk’s assassination and all forms of political violence; commended law enforcement for catching Kirk’s alleged killer; extended condolences to Kirk’s family; honored Kirk’s life, leadership and legacy; and called upon all Americans — regardless of race, party affiliation or creed — to «reject political violence, recommit to respectful debate, uphold American values, and respect one another as fellow Americans.»

AOC claimed Charlie Kirk’s «rhetoric and beliefs were ignorant, uneducated and sought to disenfranchise millions of Americans.» (Fox News)
‘FEARLESS’ TOUR TAKES CHARLIE KIRK’S FREE SPEECH MISSION TO COLLEGES NATIONWIDE
In addition to Ocasio-Cortez, 57 other Democrats voted against the resolution, including Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Maxine Waters of California.
However, 95 Democrats voted to adopt the resolution, including Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., and Caucus Chairman Pete Aguilar, D-Calif.
Here is a breakdown of public comments Kirk made regarding the topics Ocasio-Cortez mentioned in her dissent.
AOC CLAIM: Charlie Kirk was «a man who believed that the Civil Rights Act that granted Black Americans the right to vote was a ‘mistake’»
During a Feb. 2, 2024, podcast episode with «Fearless» host Jason Whitlock, Kirk acknowledged his ideas about the Civil Rights Act and its role in American society were «provocative,» thanking Whitlock for the opportunity to further explain.
«It’s an awful provocative conversation I started. I stand by it, and I appreciate the opportunity. I mean this sincerely, Jason — to explain it. There’s even some people on the right that have been just throwing insults, and they would never have me on the show to explain it.»
Kirk went on to say he extensively researched what the Civil Rights Act was, what it tried to accomplish, how it was sold to the American people at the time and how it is perceived now by the modern academic consensus.

Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, speaks during the Turning Point Action conference July 15, 2023, in West Palm Beach, Fla. (AP Photo/Lynne Sladky, File)
«At the time, of course, there were legislative priorities that needed to be done by the federal government to stop bitter segregation — I’ve always held that,» Kirk said. «The American people thought they were getting minor legislative adjustments to say that segregation based on race is evil and wrong. In reality, what they got was the birthing of a permanent deep state of bureaucrats that were looking for racism where it didn’t exist, eventually with affirmative action, quotas and hiring practices expanded beyond race into LGBTQ-type issues.
«What the Civil Rights era really birthed was this idea that it’s the federal government’s job not just to say that discrimination is wrong, but to actively go against any sort of disparate outcome and try to even the score under the guise of equity.»
ANTI-TRUMP VOICES PRAISE CHARLIE KIRK’S LEGACY AFTER ASSASSINATION, SAY HE WAS DOING POLITICS ‘THE RIGHT WAY’
Kirk went on to discuss Martin Luther King Jr.’s «I have a dream» speech, saying he «100% bought into» the need for equality, but adding he believed the Civil Rights Act was expanded further than the initial intention.
«At the time, a majority of Americans wanted to see an end to desegregation,» he said. «They didn’t want to see new segregation put forward in eventually anti-White hiring practices, affirmative action or the entire federal bureaucracy having racial hiring quotas.
«Eventually, you look around and you have the left defending Black-only dormitories at hundreds of universities across the country, Black-only graduation ceremonies. … You look back to the Civil Rights Act and you say maybe we overreached and built something we didn’t intend, a federal Leviathan in the form of anti-racism.»
WATCH: CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE FULL PODCAST EPISODE
AOC CLAIM: After Paul Pelosi’s violent assault, Charlie Kirk claimed ‘some amazing patriot’ should bail out his brutal assailant
In an Oct. 31, 2022, episode of «The Charlie Kirk Show,» titled «A Naked Smear of MAGA,» Kirk discussed the Oct. 28, 2022, attack against Nancy Pelosi’s husband, saying directly, «I’m not qualifying it, I think it’s awful.»
David DePape, a Canadian citizen living in the U.S., was sentenced to life in prison in 2024 after attacking Paul Pelosi with a hammer, causing two head wounds and injuries to his right arm and hand.
DePape, who Kirk described in the episode as someone who was «not sane,» admitted to devising a plot to hold then-Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi hostage and «break her kneecaps» if she did not admit to allegedly telling «lies» about the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign. She was not home at the time of the attack.

Kirk condemned the violent attack against Paul Pelosi, who was attacked by a man with a hammer in San Francisco Oct. 28, 2022. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
Kirk’s comments about «bailing out» DePape were in relation to the concept of disparity within cashless bail policies.
Under cashless bail policies, a suspect who is arrested for a crime is released before a trial without having to pay bail or bond. The fees were put in place to ensure suspects do not flee and incentivize them to make scheduled court appearances.
While many liberal jurisdictions have enacted the policies, critics claim cashless bail puts the public at risk and enables repeat offenders.
«I’m not qualifying [the attack], I think it’s awful,» Kirk said. «It’s not right. But why is it that, in Chicago, you’re able to commit murder and be out the next day? Why is it that you’re able to trespass, second-degree murder, arson, threaten a public official, [and receive] cashless bail? This happens all over San Francisco, but if you go after the Pelosis … you’re [not] let out immediately. Got it.»
CHARLIE KIRK PAINTED AS ‘CONTROVERSIAL,’ ‘PROVOCATIVE’ IN MEDIA’S ASSASSINATION COVERAGE
Kirk went on to question why DePape was still incarcerated in San Francisco, a Democratic stronghold that had cashless bail policies in place at the time of Paul Pelosi’s attack.
Just a few months prior to the assault, San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins announced her office established a policy that would seek cash bail in certain misdemeanor cases, claiming bail «unfairly penalizes those with less financial means and disproportionately affects defendants of color.»
«Why is the conservative movement to blame for gay, schizophrenic nudists that are hemp jewelry makers, breaking into somebody’s home?» Kirk said while discussing DePape’s ideology. «Why are we to blame for that exactly, and why is he still in jail. Why has he not been bailed out? By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out. I bet his bail is like 30[,000] or 40,000 bucks. Bail him out and then go ask him some questions.»
WATCH: CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE FULL EPISODE
Kirk went on to wish Paul Pelosi a quick recovery and condemned the attack a second time.
«So, look, I wish him the best. I wish him a speedy recovery,» Kirk said. «No one should have to encounter that sort of violence.»

Charlie Kirk was a conservative activist who led Turning Point USA. (Alex Brandon/The Associated Press)
AOC CLAIM: Charlie Kirk «accused Jews of controlling ‘not just the colleges – it’s the nonprofits, it’s the movies, it’s Hollywood, it’s all of it.’»
In an Oct. 26, 2024, episode of the «The Charlie Kirk Show» podcast, Kirk claimed Jewish donors have been the No. 1 funding mechanism of radical, open-border neoliberal quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions and nonprofits.
«This is a beast created by secular Jews,» Kirk said. «Now it’s coming for Jews, and they’re like, ‘What on Earth happened?’ It’s not just the colleges. It’s the nonprofits, it’s the movies, it’s Hollywood, it’s all of it.»
Kirk, a longtime supporter of Israel, later argued in a Nov. 16, 2023, episode of «The Charlie Kirk Show,» titled «Elon Musk Smashes the Digital Narratives,» that some Jewish organizations and donors, including the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), helped fund «anti-White» or «cultural Marxist» ideas aligned with the Black Lives Matter movement or Diversity and Equity Inclusion (DEI).
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
He noted he does not believe all Jewish people are anti-White, specifying that he did «not like generalizations.»
«I don’t like generalizations,» Kirk said in the episode. «Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true the Anti-Defamation League was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left-wing anti-White causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke, and it wasn’t just ADL. It was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges.»
Kirk added that, after the October episode, critics labeled him antisemitic, clarifying he was «glad that Jewish Americans are reconsidering their financing of cultural Marxism, and people misunderstood it intentionally and slandered us as being antisemites.»
While «Cultural Marxism» has been used as an antisemitic phrase, commentators have been known to use it without antisemitic intent.
republicans,first amendment,alexandria ocasio cortez
INTERNACIONAL
La guerra entre Estados Unidos e Irán: Europa ya plantea racionar el combustible

Las estaciones de servicio europeas siguen suministrando combustibles y los aeropuertos siguen llenando los depósitos de los aviones, pero el cierre del Estrecho de Ormuz y el choque energético que provoca podría cambiar pronto esa situación de relativa normalidad. La Comisión Europea ya adelanta que si nada cambia en los mercados energéticos habría que empezar a tomar medidas en semanas o meses y ya está indicando a los gobiernos del bloque qué decisiones serían las primeras para consumir menos combustible, sobre todo queroseno de aviación y diésel para en transporte de mercancías por carretera.
El comisario de Energía del brazo ejecutivo de la Unión Europea, el danés Dan Jorgensen, contó al diario Financial Times que la Comisión Europea está evaluando “todas las opciones” porque “los precios de la energía serán más altos durante mucho tiempo” aunque se reabra Ormuz y vuelva a salir el petróleo y el gas del Golfo Pérsico. Fuentes comunitarias llevan días explicando que Europa no está todavía en una crisis de suministro, pero que podría estarlo si el conflicto, que ya cumplió seis semanas, se alarga. Esas mismas fuentes aseguran que no ven muchas probabilidades en un cierre limpio y rápido del choque entre Irán, por un lado, y Estados Unidos e Israel por el otro, y que eso tendrá consecuencias en los mercados energéticos europeos.
Jorgensen asegura que no hay que racionar por ahora, pero sí hay que prepararse para hacerlo en los próximos meses si sigue el conflicto.
Las primeras medidas que apunta la Comisión Europea no son muy disruptivas, pero los ciudadanos podrían empezar a notarlas pronto. Sobre todo en el sector del transporte.
Bruselas pide a los gobiernos, por ejemplo, que reduzcan la velocidad máxima en autopistas para reducir el consumo de combustible (se calcula que un auto que circula a 100 kilómetros por ahora consume un 15% menos que uno en las mismas condiciones a 120 kilómetros por hora).
En la carta de Jorgensen a los gobiernos se les señala también que deben fomentar el uso del transporte público y del teletrabajo para reducir los movimientos de personas y empezar a reducir el número de vuelos, aunque eso empieza a hacerlo el mercado por su cuenta por el aumento del precio del queroseno de aviación, que se ha doblado en estas semanas de guerra.
La carta no apunta más medidas, pero la Comisión Europea sí estudia, cuentan las mismas fuentes comunitarias, una lista de sugerencias que hizo hace dos semanas la Agencia Internacional de la Energía. Entre ellas una que no se activa en Europa desde los años 70 del siglo pasado. Se trataría de reducir a la mitad el uso del auto alternando su uso en función de su matrícula. Los días pares podrían salir a las calles y carreteras los autos con matrículas pares y los días impares los autos con matrículas impares.
El discurso y las sugerencias de Jorgensen y de la Comisión Europea variaron en apenas días. Si ahora empiezan a pedir esas medidas, el 20 de marzo pasado, con la guerra ya por su tercera semana, decían que no había ningún riesgo para el suministro en Europa, que no veían necesidad de tomar medidas excepcionales y que el continente estaba “relativamente protegido” porque sus importaciones de hidrocarburos desde el Golfo Pérsico en particular y desde Oriente Medio en general eran limitadas.
La única medida que se planteaba hace un mes es una que se toma cada año desde que empezó la guerra en Ucrania, el llenado de las reservas europeas de gas en primavera y verano para tenerlas llenas antes de las próximas estaciones de otoño e invierno. Ahora mismo esas reservas no llegan al 30% de su capacidad.
La subida radical del precio del queroseno de aviación preocupa en la Comisión Europea porque una reducción sustancial de vuelos en Europa en los próximos meses podría afectar de lleno a la campaña de primavera y verano del turismo, un sector económico esencial en el bloque y vital para las economías europeas del Mediterráneo.
El combustible, cuenta la Comisión Europea, supone entre un 25% y un 30% del coste total de operación de las aerolíneas, por lo que duplicar su precio les hace un agujero económico. Según la IATA (siglas en inglés de la Asociación Internacional del Transporte Aéreo) el barril de queroseno de aviación pasó de 99,4 dólares el 27 de febrero a 195,19 dólares un mes después, el 27 de marzo.
INTERNACIONAL
Zelensky exigió a Rusia detener los ataques sobre infraestructuras energéticas para avanzar hacia un alto el fuego

El presidente de Ucrania, Volodimir Zelensky, propuso este lunes a Rusia la posibilidad de una tregua únicamente si se detienen por completo los ataques dirigidos a la infraestructura energética ucraniana.
“Si Rusia está dispuesta a frenar los golpes sobre nuestra red eléctrica, nosotros también responderemos en la misma medida”, afirmó el mandatario en su mensaje diario.
Según Zelensky, la propuesta fue transmitida a Moscú a través de mediadores estadounidenses y constituye el único escenario en el que Kiev contempla un cese de hostilidades.
La iniciativa de alto el fuego surge tras una nueva ola de ataques rusos que devastaron varias regiones y dejaron víctimas civiles en Odesa, donde un bombardeo nocturno mató a tres personas, incluido un niño pequeño.
“Hemos ofrecido reiteradamente a Rusia una pausa, al menos durante la Pascua, un periodo especial para ambos pueblos. Pero para ellos, todos los días son iguales. Nada es sagrado”, lamentó el presidente de Ucrania.
El Kremlin respondió fríamente a la propuesta anterior, indicando que sólo consideraría una negociación para un acuerdo de paz total.
Zelensky también subrayó que las conversaciones con Estados Unidos continúan centradas en lograr garantías de seguridad duraderas para Ucrania.
“Trabajamos junto a los negociadores estadounidenses en mecanismos que aseguren la estabilidad futura. Ese es el factor clave para una paz real”, explicó, al tiempo que destacó la importancia de la cooperación internacional en el contexto actual.
Durante la última semana, Rusia intensificó sus ataques con drones y misiles sobre infraestructuras vitales en las provincias de Kharkiv, Chernigov, Sumi y Dnipró. El presidente detalló que, solo en la noche previa, fueron lanzados más de 140 drones, de los cuales cerca de 80 eran del tipo Shahed, de fabricación iraní.
Zelensky denunció que “en algunas zonas, los bombardeos continúan. Esto representa apenas una muestra del sufrimiento diario de nuestra población”. Añadió que, en los últimos siete días, el país sufrió el impacto de más de 2.800 drones de ataque, 1.350 bombas aéreas guiadas y más de 40 misiles.
El ataque más reciente en Odesa resultó particularmente grave para la población civil. Según Zelensky, “los drones rusos impactaron edificios residenciales, una guardería infantil y una subestación eléctrica. Miles de familias han quedado sin luz, y los equipos de reparación llevan horas trabajando sin descanso para restablecer el suministro”.
La cifra oficial de heridos ascendió a 16, entre ellos dos menores y una mujer embarazada.
El presidente ucraniano insistió en la necesidad de reforzar las defensas aéreas del país. “En este momento, todos los socios internacionales deben redoblar esfuerzos y aportar más sistemas para interceptar drones y misiles. Mejorar la protección de nuestros cielos no solo protege a Ucrania, sino que también es una inversión en la seguridad de Europa”, subrayó.
En paralelo, las autoridades rusas informaron sobre un ataque con drones lanzado desde Ucrania contra la ciudad portuaria de Novorossiysk, en la región de Krasnodar, que dejó ocho heridos, entre ellos dos niños. Las imágenes publicadas muestran daños visibles en la parte superior de un edificio residencial, con ventanas y balcones destruidos por la explosión.
A pesar del aumento de los ataques rusos y de la negativa de Moscú a aceptar la tregua propuesta, Zelensky reiteró que Ucrania mantiene abierta la vía diplomática, siempre que se respeten condiciones mínimas que garanticen la protección de la infraestructura civil.
“Nuestra disposición a negociar depende de la voluntad de Rusia para detener la destrucción de instalaciones energéticas y evitar más víctimas inocentes”, concluyó el presidente.
(Con información de Reuters y EFE)
Europe,Military Conflicts
INTERNACIONAL
Obama Center takes heat as critics cry foul over ID rules for free entry — while Dems blast voter ID laws

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The Obama Presidential Center is facing a wave of backlash ahead of its opening, with critics blasting its admission policies and raising broader concerns about the project’s cost and management.
Conservative commentators on social media are taking aim at the center’s requirement that Illinois residents show valid identification to receive free admission on certain days, arguing it contrasts with Democratic opposition to voter ID laws.
«They’re making you show ID… to visit the Obama Library… in Chicago. You can’t make this stuff up!» one social media user wrote.
«The Obama Presidential Library is making people show an ID for proof of Illinois residency to get in for free,» another posted. «So residents have to prove who they are for this, but not to vote?»
VALERIE JARRETT REVEALS THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP ISN’T INVITED TO OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL CENTER OPENING CEREMONY
The text of former President Obama’s speech marking the 50th anniversary of «Bloody Sunday» in Selma, Alabama, is wrapped around the side of the upcoming presidential center in Chicago. (E. Jason Wambsgans/Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service)
Others echoed the sentiment more bluntly, with one account writing: «It turns out Democrats support requiring ID… but only for free admission into Obama’s library.»
Obama’s website clearly states that Illinois residents «must be able to provide proof of residency. Be prepared to show proof of residency at the Museum with a valid photo ID, Illinois driver’s license, state ID, or city-issued ID.»
Critics have also pointed to reported restrictions tied to early ticket giveaways, including claims that some promotions are limited to U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents.
The latest controversy builds on a string of prior criticisms surrounding the $850 million project.
OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL CENTER SLAMMED FOR PROMOTING ‘FAR-LEFT’ AGENDA ON PUBLIC LAND

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker (L) joins former President Barack Obama and former first lady Michelle Obama in a ceremonial groundbreaking at the Obama Presidential Center in Jackson Park on September 28, 2021, in Chicago. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Earlier this year, the Obama Foundation drew backlash after seeking 75 to 100 unpaid volunteers, dubbed «ambassadors,» to help operate the center, even as top executives collect substantial salaries. Federal filings show CEO Valerie Jarrett has earned roughly $740,000 annually in recent years, while overall compensation at the foundation has climbed significantly.
The project has also faced mounting scrutiny over its financial impact on taxpayers.
Former President Barack Obama once described the center as a «gift» to Chicago, emphasizing it would be privately funded. While construction of the 19.3-acre campus is being financed through private donations, the surrounding infrastructure needed to support the site, including road redesigns, utility relocations and drainage systems, is being paid for with public funds.
Early estimates put those infrastructure costs at roughly $350 million, split between the city and state. But more recent figures show Illinois alone has committed approximately $229 million, while Chicago has allocated more than $200 million in related improvements — though officials have not provided a clear, consolidated total of taxpayer spending tied to the project.
GOT A TIP?

Exterior view of the Obama Presidential Center tower under construction in Chicago. (Fox 32 Chicago)
«No single agency appears to oversee the full scope» of the infrastructure work, and critics say the lack of transparency has made it difficult to determine the true public cost.
Illinois Republican Party Chair Kathy Salvi criticized the project, saying taxpayers are being left «on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars» while accusing state leaders of mismanagement.
FOLLOW US ON X
The controversy is further fueled by the nature of the site itself. The center sits on nearly 20 acres of historic Jackson Park land transferred under a long-term agreement, with significant roadway changes, including the removal of a major thoroughfare, and utility overhauls required to accommodate the campus.
Foundation officials have defended the project, saying the center is funded by $850 million in private investment and will serve as an economic catalyst for Chicago’s South Side, generating jobs, community programs and public amenities.
GET BREAKING NEWS BY EMAIL
Despite the backlash, the center is pressing ahead with its long-awaited debut.
Tickets for the museum will go on sale April 21 for «Founding Members,» with general public sales beginning May 6. Visitors can reserve timed-entry tickets for dates between June 19 and November 30.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE US NEWS
Admission is set at $30 for adults and $23 for children ages 3 to 11, with discounted rates available for Illinois residents who provide proof of residency. Children 2 and under can enter for free, and Illinois residents will be eligible for free admission on Tuesdays.
All entries will be timed, with officials urging guests to arrive within 10 minutes of their scheduled slot. The museum will feature four levels of exhibits, including a replica Oval Office and the Sky Room.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Much of the surrounding campus, including gardens, walking trails, a playground, a Chicago Public Library branch and dozens of newly commissioned artworks, will be free and open to the public.
Fox News Digital reached out to the Obama Foundation and the Barack Obama Presidential Library for comment.
Fox News Digital’s Michael Dorgan contributed to this report.
infrastructure across america, museums exhibits, chicago, barack obama, illinois
INTERNACIONAL2 días agoLa nueva advertencia de Donald Trump a Irán: «El tiempo se acaba, quedan 48 horas antes del infierno»
POLITICA2 días agoCírculo rojo: intrigas en el gabinete, desgaste por el caso Adorni y movimientos inquietantes en el Poder Judicial
POLITICA2 días agoCréditos del Banco Nación: el Gobierno reveló que Pettovello echó a Massaccesi porque “mintió”
















