Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

El ex presidente de Brasil Jair Bolsonaro será juzgado por intento de golpe de Estado: ¿Puede ir preso?

Published

on


Un panel de jueces del Supremo Tribunal Federal de Brasil dictaminó por unanimidad que el ex presidente Jair Bolsonaro y siete de sus asociados serán juzgados por cinco cargos, incluyendo el intento de llevar a cabo un golpe de Estado después que el líder de ultraderecha perdiera las elecciones de 2022.

El panel revisará las pruebas existentes, potencialmente reunirá nuevas pruebas y escuchará testimonios. Los expertos legales estiman que Bolsonaro podría ser sentenciado a hasta 40 años de prisión, aunque su tiempo real en la cárcel —si es condenado— será menor debido a consideraciones procesales.

Advertisement

Esto es lo que se debe saber sobre lo que sucederá después del fallo del miércoles:

¿Qué cargos enfrenta Bolsonaro?

Bolsonaro será juzgado por los cargos de intentar perpetrar a cabo un golpe de Estado, participación en una organización criminal armada, intento de abolición violenta del Estado de derecho democrático, daño caracterizado por violencia y una amenaza grave contra los bienes del Estado, y deterioro del patrimonio listado.

Advertisement

Video

Jair Bolsonaro habló ante la prensa luego de ser imputado por la Corte Suprema

El panel de cinco jueces del Supremo Tribunal Federal de Brasil dictaminó basándose en la acusación del procurador general Paulo Gonet. Su acusación formal provino de una investigación de la policía federal que colocó a Bolsonaro en la cima de una organización criminal que había estado activa desde al menos 2021.

Gonet también acusó a Bolsonaro de apoyar un plan que supuestamente incluía envenenar a su sucesor, el actual presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, y asesinar al juez del Supremo Tribunal Alexandre de Moraes.

Advertisement

¿Cuándo comienza el juicio y qué sucederá?

Aunque no se ha fijado una fecha específica para el juicio, se espera que el presidente del panel del Supremo Tribunal esboce el marco procesal en los próximos días.

Eloísa Machado, profesora de Derecho en la universidad Fundação Getulio Vargas en Sao Paulo, explicó que comienza la fase probatoria del caso penal, que incluye interrogatorios a los acusados, testimonios de testigos y otros procedimientos como exámenes periciales. Muchos de esos procedimientos serán llevados a cabo por jueces auxiliares.

Advertisement
Los periodistas escuchan al juez de la Corte Suprema Alexandre de Moraes durante las audiencias. Foto AP

“Entonces, el relator prepara un informe y solicita una fecha para el juicio”, afirmó Machado. “Después de esta etapa, los fiscales y los abogados defensores presentarán sus argumentos finales antes de que el tribunal decida si absolver o condenar”.

El equipo de defensa de Bolsonaro había solicitado que el caso fuera enviado al pleno del Supremo Tribunal, no sólo al panel de cinco jueces, lo que podría retrasar un fallo hasta 2026, ya que los 11 jueces tendrían que opinar sobre el caso. La solicitud fue denegada.

¿Quién juzgará a Bolsonaro?

Advertisement

El Supremo Tribunal de Brasil está utilizando uno de sus dos paneles permanentes de cinco jueces para juzgar a Bolsonaro. Ninguno de los cinco fue nombrado por Bolsonaro.

Como relator del caso, el juez de Moraes presentó los cargos al panel del que forma parte.

Los otros cuatro jueces son Cármen Lúcia, considerada una de las más duras en casos penales; Cristiano Zanin, el presidente del panel y abogado de Lula entre 2013 y 2023; Flávio Dino, nombrado por el presidente del PT en 2023 después de servir como su ministro de Justicia; y Luiz Fux, presidente del tribunal entre 2020 y 2022, considerado un moderado.

Advertisement

¿Pisará Bolsonaro la prisión?

La ley penal brasileña establece que los encarcelamientos ocurren sólo después de una condena final e inapelable.

El Supremo Tribunal de Brasil, siendo la corte de apelaciones final para casos penales que involucran a autoridades públicas, posee la jurisdicción definitiva sobre el caso de Bolsonaro.

Advertisement

Si el expresidente toma alguna medida que obstaculice la capacidad del tribunal para emitir su fallo, como buscar refugio en una embajada, podría ser arrestado antes de que termine el juicio.

¿Qué ha dicho Bolsonaro?

Bolsonaro, quien ha sido inhabilitado para postularse a un cargo hasta 2030 por abuso de poder y socavar la confianza en el sistema de votación del país, ha negado haber cometido irregularidades y afirma que es el objetivo de una persecución política.

Advertisement

“Si voy a la cárcel, les daré mucho trabajo”, dijo Bolsonaro después de la decisión del Supremo Tribunal del miércoles.

¿Han sido juzgados otros presidentes brasileños?

Lula fue condenado por corrupción y lavado de dinero por el juez de primera instancia Sergio Moro en 2017, y su sentencia fue posteriormente confirmada por un grupo de magistrados. Cumplió más de un año y siete meses en prisión y fue liberado después que el Supremo Tribunal cambió su jurisprudencia para prohibir encarcelamientos para cualquier brasileño hasta que se agoten todas las apelaciones.

Advertisement

En 2021, el mismo tribunal anuló la sentencia de Lula al encontrar que Moro era parcial. Moro dejó su cargo como juez federal para convertirse en ministro de Justicia de Bolsonaro.

Michel Temer, quien gobernó entre 2016 y 2018 luego que Dilma Rousseff fuera destituida, fue absuelto por una corte federal en 2024 en un caso de corrupción y lavado de dinero. Fue brevemente arrestado en 2019 bajo la acusación de beneficiarse de contratos fraudulentos entre la estatal Eletronuclear y las empresas AF Consult Ltd y Engevix durante su periodo como vicepresidente.

Fernando Collor, quien gobernó entre 1990 y su destitución en 1992, fue sentenciado a ocho años y 10 meses de prisión en 2023 por su papel en un esquema de corrupción en la entonces estatal BR Distribuidora. La sentencia fue confirmada por el Supremo Tribunal el año pasado, pero Collor aún no ha sido encarcelado.

Advertisement

Altos mandos militares serán juzgados por primera vez ante el Supremo Tribunal

La inclusión de altos mandos militares para ser juzgados en el Supremo Tribunal de Brasil es un hecho sin precedentes, ya que la transición del país de una dictadura militar a la democracia en la década de 1980 estuvo marcada por una amplia amnistía para el personal militar.

Cuatro altos mandos militares que operaron bajo Bolsonaro serán juzgados. Estos son el exministro de Defensa Paulo Sérgio Nogueira; el excomandante de la Marina Almir Garnier Santos; el general retirado Augusto Heleno, quien encabezó la Oficina de Seguridad Institucional; y el general retirado Walter Braga Netto, quien se desempeñó como jefe de gabinete y ministro de Defensa de Bolsonaro.

Advertisement

“Es probable que los generales de cuatro estrellas acusados de planear un golpe de Estado sean condenados y castigados bajo el sistema legal democrático de Brasil”, señaló João Roberto Martins Filho, profesor de Ciencia Políticas en la Universidad Federal de Sao Carlos y expresidente de la Asociación Brasileña de Estudios de Defensa. “Cualquiera que intente un golpe respaldado por militares y falle podría enfrentar consecuencias como las que estamos viendo ahora. Podrían terminar en prisión”.

INTERNACIONAL

¿Guiños a EEUU?: las medidas adoptadas por la dictadura de Nicaragua tras la captura de Nicolás Maduro

Published

on


Especialistas aseguran que el régimen de Ortega y Murillo busca un acercamiento a EEUU (AP Foto/Alfredo Zuniga)

El dictador sandinista Daniel Ortega, en el poder en Nicaragua desde 2007, ha guardado su retórica antiimperialista, ha excarcelado a presos políticos, ha nombrado a una nueva encargada de negocios en Washington, y ha restablecido el requisito de visado para ciudadanos de 128 países que generalmente usaban Managua como puente para acercase a EEUU, desde la caída de su entonces aliado venezolano, el narcodictador Nicolás Maduro, quien fue capturado por fuerzas norteamericanas el pasado 3 de enero.

La última medida del régimen de Nicaragua, el viernes pasado, fue el restablecimiento del requisito de visa para ciudadanos de 128 países, entre ellos a los de Cuba, Venezuela, China, Irán, Siria, Haití y naciones africanas, en medio de las presiones de la Administración de Donald Trump por la migración irregular.

Advertisement

Estas son las medidas más importantes adoptadas por el régimen nicaragüense que dirige Ortega junto a su esposa, Rosario Murillo, desde la caída de Maduro, el pasado 3 de enero, quienes, según expertos, buscan una negociación con Washington.

Las nuevas restricciones al visado
Las nuevas restricciones al visado en Nicaragua excluyen a ciudadanos con pasaportes diplomáticos u oficiales, según acuerdos bilaterales vigentes (Cortesía: Redes sociales)

Nicaragua impuso nuevamente el requisito de visado para ciudadanos de 128 países luego de haber establecido, en los últimos cuatro años, acuerdos de libre visados con Cuba y con países africanos.

EEUU había tildado de “preocupante” la política de puertas abiertas que aplicaba el régimen nicaragüense para facilitar la migración de forma irregular hacia el país norteamericano a través de Managua, donde aterrizaban vuelos chárter procedentes de países de África, Asia y Europa.

Indígenas detenidos por la dictaudra
Indígenas detenidos por la dictaudra de Daniel Ortega y Rosario Murillo

El pasado 10 de enero, en el marco del aniversario de los 19 años en el poder que lleva Ortega de forma consecutiva, Nicaragua excarceló a decenas de presos políticos. Esa excarcelación se produjo un día después de que la embajada de Estados Unidos en Managua recordara que tras el “paso importante” dado por Venezuela para liberar a “un gran número de presos políticos”, en Nicaragua también hay “más de 60 personas” que siguen “injustamente detenidas o desaparecidas”.

Washington ha estado presionando por una “liberación incondicional” y no excarcelación de los presos políticos. También ha abogado en las últimas horas por la liberación “inmediata” e “incondicional” de un grupo de guardabosques indígenas de la etnia mayangna, de quienes, dijo, “siguen injustamente detenidos por denunciar valientemente la corrupción de la dictadura” de Ortega y Murillo.

Advertisement
Rosario Murillo fue designada como
Rosario Murillo fue designada como «copresidenta» por el régimen de Ortega

El 10 de enero pasado, las autoridades estadounidenses insistieron en sus presiones: “Hoy, la brutal dictadura Murillo-Ortega ‘celebra’ 19 años de lo que debía haber sido un mandato democrático de cinco años”. “Los nicaragüenses votaron por un presidente en el 2006, no por una dinastía ilegítima vitalicia. Reescribir la Constitución y aplastar a la disidencia no borrarán las aspiraciones de los nicaragüenses de vivir libres de la tiranía”, señaló EEUU en su mensaje.

El 30 de enero, EEUU acusó a Murillo de haberse inventado “una ‘copresidencia’ para consolidar su control ilegítimo sobre Nicaragua: sin elecciones, sin mandato, sin legitimidad”, porque sabe “que no puede ganar” en un proceso electoral libre, y la tildó de “cobarde”.

Murillo, que era vicepresidenta de Nicaragua desde 2017 y designada copresidenta desde febrero de 2025 a través de esa reforma constitucional, ha guardado silencio desde entonces.

Por otro lado, Ortega, acostumbrado a un verbo encendido contra “los imperialistas de la Tierra”, ha guardado sus adjetivos desde la captura de Maduro, aunque sí ha demandado el respeto a la soberanía de Venezuela, la liberación de su aliado, y que cesen las “amenazas” contra Cuba.

Advertisement
Ortega y Maduro fueron estrechos
Ortega y Maduro fueron estrechos aliados hasta la caída del dictador venezolano (REUTERS/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria)

En medio de esa escalada, Nicaragua nombró a Guisell Morales como nueva encargada de negocios en EEUU, donde Managua no tiene embajador desde febrero de 2024. Morales se desempeñaba como ministra Asesora para Políticas y Relaciones Internacionales.

Según un análisis del Centro de Estudios Transdisciplinarios de Centroamérica (Cetcam), Ortega y Murillo buscan una negociación con Estados Unidos tras la caída de Maduro.

Una postura que comparte Luis Fley, dirigente de la Fuerza Democrática Nicaragüense (FDN), quien dijo a EFE que “a lo único que le teme la dictadura Ortega-Murillo es a la presión norteamericana”, y que ahora tienen “un espejo en qué verse, que es el espejo de Maduro”.

(Con información de EFE)

Advertisement



onu-nicaragua

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Chicago-area teacher breaks silence after losing job over 2-word Facebook post supporting ICE: ‘Devastating’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FIRST ON FOX: A Chicago area teacher who was forced to resign from his position over his Facebook post saying «Go ICE» is speaking out about the emotional and financial toll he has suffered as a result.

Advertisement

«This process has been professionally and personally devastating and surreal,» former West Chicago teacher James Heidorn told Fox News Digital in his first public comments about the situation. 

«I’ve spent 14 years building my career, pouring my heart into teaching kids, building relationships and being a positive role model. To see it all upended over two simple words, ‘Go ICE,’ where I expressed my personal support for law enforcement felt like a severe blow to my career.»

In late January, Fox News Digital first reported that the longtime teacher at Gary Elementary School in a heavily Hispanic district was placed on leave after local activists in the community began sharing his Facebook post that said «GO ICE» in response to a news story about a local police department saying they would cooperate with ICE. 

Advertisement

GOT A SCOOP ON CAMPUS? SEND US A TIP HERE

A West Chicago PE teacher who resigned over a Facebook post supporting ICE is speaking out about what happened.

On Thursday, Jan. 22, Heidorn was first notified by school officials that they had seen the growing social media chatter about his post. He briefly quit after meeting with HR staff before rescinding his resignation the same day. Heidorn was set to return to school to teach on Monday while the school investigated.

Advertisement

Around the same time, Illinois Democratic state Sen. Karina Villa, who was captured on video in September chasing down ICE agents in the street, publicly expressed outrage over the post and said she stands in «unwavering solidarity» with families upset about the «disturbing comments reportedly made by an educator.»

On that Saturday, before an investigation had been concluded, West Chicago Mayor Daniel Bovey took to Facebook and posted a video explaining why Heidorn’s comments were «hurtful» and «offensive» to many in the community.

«The issue is we have trusted adults who are the ones that care for those kids when they can’t be with their mom and their dad,» Bovey said. «So to have someone cavalierly rooting on — as if it’s a football game or something, yeah go — events which have traumatized these children… that is the issue.»

Advertisement

Over the weekend, parents online were encouraging each other to keep their students home from school as a form of protest, and many in the community began criticizing Heidorn. 

The city of West Chicago held a «listening session» on Jan. 26 at the request of Bovey, that included a Spanish translator, where a variety of parents and locals expressed concerns about the post, including a woman who said «kids do not feel safe» as a result of the post and another woman who said the post was «cruel.»

«This started with a two-word comment on my personal Facebook page supporting law enforcement—nothing more,» Heidorn said. «It wasn’t directed at any student, family or school community. Second, I was placed on leave and faced intense pressure before any full investigation or fair process could play out, with this it led to my resignation.» 

Advertisement

«Third, I lost my career, my income and the chance to close out my time with my students properly—no farewell, no goodbyes.»

Ultimately, Heidorn resigned a second time rather than be terminated after a hearing with school officials.

In a statement to Fox News Digital at the time that Heidorn was on leave in January, a West Chicago Elementary School District 33 spokesperson referred to the social media post as «disruptive» and said, «We understand that this situation has raised concerns and caused disruption for students, families and staff.»

Advertisement

Teachers all across the United States have taken to the streets in recent weeks, causing disruptions in favor of far-left causes, including in Chicago, where teachers stormed a local Target and harassed employees, to protest President Donald Trump’s immigration policies without facing pushback or repercussions from local school districts. 

TOP TEACHERS UNION UNDER FIRE AS LAWMAKERS PUSH TO STRIP UNION OF UNIQUE FEDERAL CHARTER: ‘LOST THEIR WAY’

Gary Elementary in West Chicago

Gary Elementary School in West Chicago (Google Maps)

«Most importantly, this is bigger than me: it’s about whether personal opinions expressed outside of work can cost someone their livelihood without due process,» Heidorn said. «I hope to see free speech matters, even when it’s unpopular.»

Advertisement

«It does feel like a double standard—due to my viewpoint being different from others within the community that I taught in. I feel that we should all be able to coexist with our personal political viewpoints. Fairness should apply equally, regardless of those viewpoints. If personal political speech is grounds for punishment, it should be consistent—not selective based on what side you’re on. I believe in free speech for all, and that’s what I hope comes out of all this.»

Heidorn has received some support from the local community, including a GoFundMe page calling him a «beloved physical education teacher» who «showed up every day for his students.»

«Emotionally, it’s been a roller coaster that has me feeling a great deal of shock, loss and deep sadness over losing daily contact with my students,» Heidorn said. «Feelings of anger and frustration at how quickly things escalated without real dialogue, and grief for not getting to say a proper goodbye to the kids I cared so much for. I’ve had sleepless nights, but I’m trying to stay focused on my family and the support I’ve received from people who know the real me.»

Advertisement

Heidorn, who also lost his employment working as a soccer coach at a nearby private school, told Fox News Digital that one of the most difficult aspects of being forced from his job was losing the relationships he built with his students of all backgrounds over his long career. 

Asked what he would tell his students if given the opportunity to address the situation with them directly, Heidorn said the online outrage «isn’t the full story» and is «just noise from people who don’t know me.»

«To my students: I want you to know that I care about you deeply and always have. The person you knew in class—the one who encouraged you, played with you and cheered you on—is still the same person,» Heidorn said. «I always tried to provide the best learning environment and great atmosphere for us all to grow. I have always had your best interest in mind by showing passion, support, care, and safety no matter what.»

Advertisement

Heidorn added, «I would never want any of you to feel unsafe or unloved. You are amazing kids, and I’m proud of every moment we shared. I know I can’t change people’s minds for those who are angry, upset and have lost trust in me, and I am sorry for that because I always had my students and the community’s best interests in mind, and I never intended to cause fear or harm to them or their families.»

CHICAGO TEACHERS UNION PROMOTES VENEZUELA REGIME CHANGE PROTESTS ORGANIZED BY SOCIALIST GROUPS

ICE police patrol a street

Federal ICE officers walk down a suburban street. (Christopher Dilts/Getty Images)

Fox News Digital reached out to the district for a specific comment on what rule Heidorn violated by posting support for law enforcement on Facebook and if teachers who are publicly «disruptive» against or antagonize ICE will be treated the same way. The district did not respond. 

Advertisement

When reached for comment, Bovey pushed back on the suggestion he inflamed the situation with his Facebook video, saying, «Personally, I wish the teacher well.»

«The teacher used his First Amendment rights to make a statement,» Bovey said. «Others used their First Amendment rights in commenting on the situation. The school board took appropriate action to go through the due process of investigating a situation which had adversely impacted the education of children. The public used their First Amendment rights to comment (in favor and against) the actions of the school board and then the teacher made a decision to resign. At the end of the day, though there were frustrations on both sides, which were stoked by inaccurate social media posts, this is how democracy works.»

Bovey added, «Despite a lot of vitriolic comments from people across the country who were misinformed by social media, our local community seems remarkably unified.»

Advertisement

Heidorns said he has always taken his role «extremely seriously» over his 14-year career and that his reputation was «built on showing up every day, being reliable, fair and genuinely invested in my students’ growth.»

«My students’ successes are what drove me more than you could know,» Heidorn said. «I never brought politics into my teaching; my focus was always on my students. Losing that connection hurts more than anything, and I want people to know I never intended to harm or divide anyone.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement
Large mural spelling

The «Greetings from Chicago» mural brightens a street in the Logan Square neighborhood on March 30, 2018. (Patrick Gorski/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Going forward, Heidorn will be required to inform future school districts he applies to that he resigned and provide specifics why, which leaves any potential of furthering his career in the area unclear. 

«I really don’t know what is next for me, as the teaching profession has been, up to this point in time, all that I ever wanted to do,» he explained. «It is all I have ever studied for and teaching is what has defined me. Even advancing my education with a master’s degree in educational leadership because I wanted to become the best teacher I can be.»

«With that said—I’m exploring options in education or related fields, but I’m also taking time to heal and learn from this experience. I want people to know I’m grateful for the outpouring of support from those who reached out, donated or shared my story. It reminds me that most people value fairness and second chances. I’m determined to move forward positively and keep contributing to kids’ lives in whatever way I can.»

Advertisement

campus radicals,immigration,education

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Israeli intelligence sources reject claims Jeffrey Epstein was Mossad operative following document releases

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A wave of recent reporting and newly released documents detailing the relationship between former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Jeffrey Epstein has reignited claims that Epstein worked for Israel’s Mossad, a theory Israeli intelligence sources and senior political leaders are forcefully rejecting.

Advertisement

Ex-Israeli intelligence officials told Fox News Digital that Epstein never worked for Mossad, describing the allegation as baseless and inconsistent with how the agency operates.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu publicly pushed back on the claims, writing on X: «Jeffrey Epstein’s unusual close relationship with Ehud Barak doesn’t suggest Epstein worked for Israel. It proves the opposite.»

PRINCESS SOFIA OF SWEDEN BREAKS SILENCE ON EPSTEIN ENCOUNTERS AFTER DOJ FILE RELEASE

Advertisement

In the same post, Netanyahu escalated his criticism, writing: «Stuck on his election loss from over two decades ago, Barak has for years obsessively attempted to undermine Israeli democracy by working with the anti-Zionist radical left in failed attempts to overthrow the elected Israeli government.»

Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett also sharply dismissed the accusations, writing: «As a former Israeli Prime Minister, with the Mossad having reported directly to me, I say to you with 100% certainty: The accusation that Jeffrey Epstein somehow worked for Israel or the Mossad ran a blackmail ring is categorically and totally false. Epstein’s conduct, both the criminal and the merely despicable, had nothing whatsoever to do with the Mossad or the State of Israel. Epstein never worked for the Mossad.»

Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak is seen in this handout image from the estate of late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, released by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee on Dec. 12, 2025. (House Oversight Committee Democrats/Handout via Reuters)

Advertisement

Ex-Mossad director Yossi Cohen also rejected the claims in a podcast interview with The Free Press, saying Epstein had «absolutely nothing» to do with the Mossad — «not an agent, not an operative, nothing.»

The strong denials come amid renewed scrutiny of emails, financial records and communications included in U.S. Justice Department materials and other public reporting, none of which indicate that Epstein cooperated with Israeli intelligence.

Barak, who served as prime minister from 1999 to 2001 and later as defense minister in Netanyahu’s government, has become one of Netanyahu’s most vocal political opponents. 

Advertisement

PRINCE WILLIAM’S ENVIRONMENTAL CHARITY REPORTED OVER PARTNER’S EPSTEIN TIES

Picture of former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak

Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak during a press conference on July 25, 2019, in Tel Aviv. (Amir Levy/Getty Images)

In a statement to Fox News Digital, Barak’s office fired back, describing Netanyahu’s remarks as politically motivated and reiterating that he regrets ever meeting Epstein while denying any wrongdoing.

«Barak has repeatedly and publicly stated that he regrets ever meeting Jeffrey Epstein. There is no credible allegation—none—that Barak engaged in any illegal or inappropriate conduct,» the statement said.

Advertisement

Barak’s office also called Netanyahu’s attacks «the desperate acts of a failed and panicked politician» and «a pathetic attempt to divert attention from his catastrophic record,» accusing the prime minister of attempting to shift blame for national failures.

Newly surfaced materials continue to document Barak’s personal and professional interactions with Epstein, including stays at Epstein’s New York apartment and meetings arranged through the financier.

EXCLUSIVE: EPSTEIN EMAILS RELEASED AS DOJ SAYS NO CRIMINAL OR INAPPROPRIATE CONDUCT BY TRUMP

Advertisement
Jeffrey Epstein mugshot

Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in federal custody in 2019. (New York State Sex Offender Registry via AP, File)

Emails cited in document releases describe the apartment as being used by Barak and his then-wife during visits to the United States, with staff coordinating logistics and maintenance requests tied to the property.

Other communications referenced financial ties and introductions facilitated by Epstein, including meetings with prominent business figures, as well as broader correspondence and internal notes referencing allegations, warnings and speculation surrounding Epstein’s activities.

Barak has acknowledged meeting Epstein multiple times and said he regrets the association. In a previous interview, he said he never witnessed improper behavior and never participated in anything illegal.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«At times during my occasional visits to the United States, I was sometimes a participant in a breakfast or lunch or dinner at his New York townhouse, together with respected American public figures,» Barak said. «At no point in my dealings with him did I ever witness any improper behavior, and I certainly never participated in anything like that.»

Advertisement



jeffrey epstein,israel,benjamin netanyahu,anti semitism

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias