Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

‘Genocide can’t be ignored’: GOP lawmaker backs Trump’s threat of military action in Nigeria

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Republican Rep. Riley Moore said the United States could take a range of actions — including sanctions and «even kinetic military action» — in response to what he called the «genocide» of Christians in Nigeria.

Advertisement

Trump designated Moore, a member of the Appropriations Committee from West Virginia, along with Chairman Tom Cole, R-Okla., to lead an investigation into the killing of Christians by Islamist militants in the African nation.

Frustrations with the matter boiled out into the open when Trump this week designated Nigeria as a country of particular concern and ordered the Pentagon to prepare to intervene militarily.

In a video on Truth Social this week, Trump threatened to «do things to Nigeria that Nigeria is not going to be happy about» and «go into that now-disgraced country guns-a-blazing.»

Advertisement

I WAS KIDNAPPED BY BOKO HARAM, AND SURVIVED. NO THANKS TO THE WEST’S SILENCE

Nigerians watch funeral procession of victims of a Boko Haram attack in Yobe Nigeria in 2024.  (Stringer/Reuters)

Moore told Fox News Digital the designation unlocks «15 different levers» the administration can use against Nigeria, including halting arms sales, freezing aid and sanctioning officials or institutions accused of ignoring or enabling religious killings.

Advertisement

«All options are on the table here for this, even kinetic military action,» Moore said. «That could mean targeted, strategic counterterrorism strikes to get rid of some of the top leadership if that’s what it takes to stop the killing.»

«We’ve been providing security assistance to this country since at least 2009 – billions of dollars worth of arm sales, training and equipment that they’ve received. And it’s a question of prioritization in what’s important to them. And clearly this has not been one of the most important things.»

The West Virginia Republican said he has been working with the House Appropriations Committee and the State Department to identify what he called «legislative levers» that could support the administration’s response. Moore said he’s also consulting with NGOs and Christian organizations «on the ground» in Nigeria to document the scale of the violence.

Advertisement

CRUZ CLASHES WITH NIGERIA OVER HIS CLAIMS 50,000 CHRISTIANS KILLED SINCE 2009 IN RELIGIOUS VIOLENCE

Father of Boko Haram victim

Solomon Maina, father of Debora, one of the 276 schoolgirls kidnapped from their dormitory by Boko Haram Islamist militants in 2014, reacts as he speaks during an interview at his home in Chibok, Nigeria April 7, 2024. (Temilade Adelaja/Reuters)

He described the attacks as a «genocide,» claiming Christians are being killed at a rate of five to one compared with non-Christians. Moore accused Nigeria’s government of «looking the other way» despite receiving billions in U.S. security aid since 2009.

«They’re not taking this seriously,» he said. «We had a pastor warn the government about an impending attack — they called it fake news. Within 24 hours, that pastor and 20 of his congregants were murdered.»

Advertisement

The Nigerian government denies a genocide is taking place. «Portraying Nigeria’s security challenges as a targeted campaign against a single religious group is a gross misrepresentation of reality. Terrorists attack all who reject their murderous ideology — Muslims, Christians, and those of no faith alike,» the office of the presidency wrote on X. 

Moore said he and House Appropriations Chairman Tom Cole, R-Okla., plan to meet with Nigerian officials in Washington this month as part of the investigation, and may even send delegations to the nation. He added that the U.S. could still work with Nigeria’s government if it shows a willingness to confront extremist groups.

BOKO HARAM KIDNAPPING SURVIVOR PRAISES TRUMP AS HE WEIGHS ‘VICIOUS’ MILITARY ACTION IN NIGERIA

Advertisement

«It’s not all sticks here — there are some carrots in this,» Moore said. «If they’re willing to work with us, this could actually lead to a stronger relationship between our countries.»

The Nigerian government has denied that the killings amount to religious persecution, arguing that extremist and criminal groups target civilians of all faiths.

With a population of more than 230 million, Nigeria’s vibrant and often turbulent cities and villages are home to people of strikingly diverse backgrounds. The country’s more than 500 languages and mix of Islam, Christianity, and traditional indigenous faiths have long been marred by tension.

Advertisement

I’M A CHRISTIAN FROM NIGER. DON’T IGNORE HORRIFYING ATTACKS ON AFRICAN CHRISTIANS

Nigeria’s faith communities remain sharply divided, with Muslims dominating the northern regions and Christians concentrated in the south.

Christianity took firm root in the 19th century, when freed slaves educated in Sierra Leone returned home as teachers and missionaries — establishing schools, churches, and early congregations that continue to shape southern Nigeria’s identity today.

Advertisement

Despite vast oil and mineral wealth, decades of corruption and mismanagement have left much of the nation impoverished.

Nigeria’s growing cache of lithium, cobalt, nickel, and other rare minerals has drawn quiet U.S. attention as Washington looks to counter China’s dominance in Africa’s critical-minerals market. The Commerce Department and U.S. International Development Finance Corp. have eyed investment opportunities in Nigeria’s nascent lithium industry, but persistent insecurity in mining regions threatens Western access and future development.

For over a decade, Nigeria’s Christians fleeing the nation’s northern half have been subject to the violence of Boko Haram, an Islamist militant group known for its terrorist spectacles. Churches and homes burned, communities vanishing in the group’s night raids.

Advertisement

Numbers are difficult to verify, but the International Society for Civil Liberties and Rule of Law reports at least 52,000 Christians have been killed, some 18,500 abducted and unlikely to have survived, and 20,000 churches and Christian schools attacked between 2009 and 2023.

In 2014, Boko Haram famously kidnapped and enslaved 276 teenage girls in a raid on a high school dormitory. The group regularly arms children as suicide bombers and holds slave markets in captured territories.

Bomb victims

Injured victims of a suicide bomb attack receive treatment at a hospital in Maiduguri, Nigeria, Sunday, June 30, 2024.  (AP Photo/Joshua Omiri)

But a direct U.S. military campaign would prove difficult with current U.S. assets in the nation and is unlikely, one defense official told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The United States currently has no permanent military base in Nigeria, though small teams of U.S. advisors and special operations trainers work periodically with Nigerian forces under AFRICOM programs.

Washington approved about $600 million in security aid to Nigeria over the past decade, mostly focused on counterterrorism in the northeast.

Advertisement

africa,christianity religion,terrorism,politics,world politics

INTERNACIONAL

Donald Trump se mete en la disputa por una isla en el Océano Índico y choca con Gran Bretaña

Published

on


El remoto archipiélago de Chagos y su isla Diego Garcia se convirtió en un conflicto entre Gran Bretaña, el gobierno de Donald Trump -que quiere utilizar la isla para atacar a Irán el sábado y se niega a que sea transferido a Mauricio-, y los isleños, que han regresado para una ocupación simbólica de sus islas, tras ser expulsados. No tienen agua caliente ni fuego para calentar la comida. Sus tiendas de campaña dejan entrar la lluvia, pero están en casa.

Después de 50 años, cuatro isleños de Chagos han desafiado las adversidades y han vencido a las lanchas patrulleras para desembarcar en las blancas playas de la Île du Coin, en un barquito.

Advertisement

Misley Mandarin, primer ministro electo de Chagos, su padre Michel, de 74 años, Antoine LeMettre y un chagosiano identificado solo como Pascal, esperan ser los primeros de cientos de personas que regresan al archipiélago.

Esta es “la avanzada» de chagosianos británicos, que protestan contra su desalojo de las islas en las décadas de 1960 y 1970 y están decididos a seguir viviendo allí.

«Nos estamos adaptando bien», dijo Mandarin al diario The Telegraph desde la isla. “Tenemos una olla arrocera, le echamos un poco de agua y luego preparamos fideos instantáneos con sabor a cerdo a la barbacoa”.

Advertisement

“Pescamos peces y hay cangrejos gigantes, pero no nos dejan comerlos. Intentamos respetar el medio ambiente. Ayer la tienda de campaña tenía goteras y mi padre y Antoine estábamos todos empapados. Pero queremos quedarnos. Esto es nuestro. Queremos quedarnos. El grupo de avanzada llegó a casa a las 5 de la mañana del martes e instaló tiendas de campaña en la playa, una de las cuales ondeaba la bandera de Chagos” contó.

Poco más de 24 horas después, a las 7 y media de la mañana del miércoles, un gran barco apareció en el horizonte. Envió una lancha patrullera con funcionarios del Territorio Británico del Océano Índico.

Todo era muy británico. Los agentes de policía tomaron café con los recién llegados. Les entregaron una orden de desalojo y, curiosamente, les dijeron que no tenían permitido encender fuego en la playa. El Estado británico expulsa a ciudadanos británicos de territorio británico.

Advertisement

Desalojo

Los hombres no se dejaron intimidar por la amenaza de desalojo. Sin embargo, les preocupa incumplir la orden de no encender fuego en la playa, pero aceptan que podría ser necesario si quieren comer comida caliente.

Será pescado capturado en el mar, en lugar de los gigantescos cangrejos cocoteros nativos de la isla, lo que los hombres cocinarán.

Advertisement

“Es curioso decir que estamos en nuestra tierra. Vinieron a ver nuestro barco, pero al principio no desembarcaron. Después de unas horas, simplemente se acercaron a nosotros en la playa y nos dieron los papeles. Les dijimos: “Somos los dueños de estas islas”, contó el premier.

“Soy el primer ministro de Chagos. Fui elegido en diciembre y vivimos aquí en paz. No queremos causar problemas. También respetamos el medio ambiente. Están entregando una orden de desalojo al primer ministro de este país. Dijo que tenía que seguir el procedimiento. Pero fueron amables, no fueron agresivos ni nada por el estilo”, contó.

El impasse marca la primera escaramuza en una batalla burocrática y legal, que podría prolongarse durante semanas o meses.

Advertisement

Esto apenas parece preocupar a estos isleños, quienes en una pequeña plataforma recorrieron 3.200 kilómetros del Océano Índico para regresar a casa.Tras el primer encuentro playero de los isleños con la burocracia británica, los agentes de policía regresaron el miércoles por la tarde.Regresaron “con intenciones más serias” y órdenes de deportación, exigiendo a los chagosianos que abandonaran la isla.

“Regresaron después de que Londres se hubiera movilizado. Así que presumiblemente consultaron con el Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores”, dijo el Sr. Holloway.“Nos dieron estas órdenes de desalojo”

Advertisement

¿Qué quiere el gobierno de Donald Trump?

Desde hace mucho tiempo existe confusión sobre la postura exacta de la administración Trump respecto al acuerdo de las Islas Chagos.

Desde que Sir Keir Starmer alcanzó un acuerdo que obligaría al Reino Unido a pagar miles de millones para ceder la base militar clave de Diego García a Mauricio y luego, arrendarla de nuevo por 100 años, los funcionarios británicos han insistido en que contaban con el apoyo estadounidense.

Advertisement

Sin embargo, los políticos de la oposición le decían a cualquiera que los escuchara que el acuerdo era perjudicial para el presidente Trump y sus aliados.

Donald Trump entró en la disputa por la isla de Chagos. Foto: BLOOMBERG

“Un gran error»

Tras mensajes contradictorios en los últimos meses, el presidente Trump finalmente ofreció algo de claridad el miércoles. En Truth Social, describió el acuerdo como «un gran error» atribuido a la «política laborista, » que sería una «lacra para nuestro Gran Aliado». Esta dura crítica pone en grave peligro el plan de Starmer.

El acuerdo ha sido durante mucho tiempo una estrategia complicada para la Casa Blanca, donde se han mantenido conversaciones entre bastidores entre quienes luchan por él y quienes desean destruirlo.

Advertisement

Desde su concepción, el Reino Unido sabía que podría ser difícil. Si bien no todos en el gobierno británico estuvieron de acuerdo con la solución, existía un consenso generalizado sobre la importancia de la base militar para la relación especial. Es una de las principales contribuciones de Gran Bretaña a la seguridad estadounidense.

Islas Chagos. / Archivo Clarín

La importancia de la isla Diego García

John Gunther Dean, ex embajador de Washington en la India, describió en una ocasión a la isla de Diego García como crucial para «la estrategia global estadounidense de estar militarmente presente en todos los rincones del planeta».

Antes del regreso de Trump, los diplomáticos trabajaban para acordar rápidamente partes del acuerdo, temiendo un resultado peor si no lo asumían.

Advertisement

Cuando Lord Mandelson asumió el cargo de embajador británico en Washington, se le encomendó la tarea de conseguir el apoyo de la administración, dialogando con funcionarios y líderes republicanos en el Capitolio.

El argumento era que si se desmentían el acuerdo, se pondrían en peligro las operaciones futuras. Esto pareció funcionar cuando Marco Rubio, el secretario de Estado, se pronunció a favor.

Rechazo en Gran Bretaña

Advertisement

Sin embargo, políticos británicos de la oposición con vínculos a la Casa Blanca han seguido presionando, utilizando sus contactos para presentar argumentos en su contra durante algún tiempo.

Entre los opositores más acérrimos con vínculos a Washington se encuentran políticos conservadores como Sir Iain Duncan Smith (quien estuvo allí este mes), la ex primera ministra Liz Truss y el líder reformista Nigel Farage.

Cuando Trump enfrentó las críticas británicas sobre Groenlandia, comenzó a criticar el acuerdo de Chagos. Fuentes cercanas a la administración Trump afirman que esto se debió “a un sentimiento de hipocresía por parte del Reino Unido”, por su intromisión y el deseo de desviar la atención de las amenazas arancelarias de Trump.

Advertisement

Desde entonces, se han intensificado los esfuerzos para presionar a la administración Trump para que endurezca la postura.

Fuentes reformistas afirman que Farage ha estado hablando con sus amigos en la administración Trump, numerosos secretarios de gabinete, durante toda la semana para cancelar el acuerdo.

Hubo confusión en este grupo a principios de semana, cuando el Departamento de Estado declaró que apoyaba la decisión del Reino Unido de «proceder con su acuerdo con Mauricio sobre el archipiélago de Chagos».

Advertisement

En cuanto a las opiniones de Trump, una de las razones por las que este gobierno -y figuras del anterior gobierno conservador británico- comenzaron a buscar un acuerdo fue el temor de que fuera insostenible reclamar unilateralmente las islas, cuando podrían enfrentarse a fallos legales de los tribunales de las Naciones Unidas que dictaran lo contrario.

Sin embargo, Trump ha dicho: “No necesito el derecho internacional” . Considera que la ONU es obsoleta y culpable de extralimitación. Por lo tanto, estos argumentos nunca iban a tener mucho peso en una administración que se basa en el mantra de “la fuerza es la razón”.

Es la venganza de Trump sobre la posición británica sobre Groenlandia y su defensa de su soberanía.

Advertisement

La base para atacar a Irán

Hay otro factor que ha centrado la atención en la administración. Trump está considerando tomar medidas en Irán.

Estados Unidos mantiene su mayor despliegue de fuerzas en la zona desde 2003. Si Trump presiona el botón, la isla Diego García se convertirá en una de las bases estratégicamente más importantes de Estados Unidos.

Advertisement

Si ataca Irán, los aviones B 52 deberán salir de la isla Diego Garcia, su gran presencia en Océano Indico.

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

GOP rips FISA court for tapping ex-Biden ‘disinformation’ lawyer to advise on surveillance

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Republican lawmakers called it «insane» that the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court appointed to a key advisory panel a lawyer with past ties to the Biden administration’s controversial Disinformation Governance Board.

Advertisement

Judges on the FISC appointed Jennifer Daskal this month to serve as an amicus curiae, meaning Daskal is now among a small group of lawyers designated to advise the secretive court, which approves warrants for federal authorities to surveil targets for foreign intelligence purposes. The GOP lawmakers say Daskal’s history with the disinformation board raises worries about her ability to discern whether warrants are appropriate.

«The same person who helped to build a board to censor American speech now advises judges on how to protect American liberties,» House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, told Fox News Digital in a statement. «That’s ridiculous — and exactly why Congress must continue our oversight.»

HOUSE PASSES FISA RENEWAL WITHOUT ADDED WARRANT MANDATE FOR US DATA

Advertisement

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, looks on during a hearing with the House Judiciary Committee in the Rayburn House Office Building on Sept. 3, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., echoed Jordan’s concerns, saying Daskal’s appointment was «insane» and calling for reforms to the FISC.

Schmitt shared a video of himself on X questioning Daskal during a hearing about what he called the Biden administration’s «censorship enterprise,» referencing Daskal’s role in aiming to dispel what the administration viewed as inaccurate information about COVID-19 masks and vaccines and information about election security.

Advertisement

FISC proceedings are classified and «ex parte,» meaning a judge reviews the federal government’s warrant application and the target of the warrant has no awareness of the proceedings. A judge reviewing the application can, however, turn to an amicus curiae to present counterpoints to the government’s application, meaning Daskal is among a handful of lawyers who could be tapped to argue against allowing the government to wiretap a person’s phones or otherwise surveil them.

FBI logo next to American flag

The logo of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is seen at the Los Angeles Federal Building after a news conference to provide an update on the investigation into a May 18, 2025, bombing at a fertility clinic in Palm Springs, California, on June 4, 2025, in Los Angeles.  (PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images)

Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the government has access to these powerful spy tools for foreign intelligence purposes, but it has sometimes, whether inadvertently or intentionally, improperly targeted U.S. citizens.

Building more guardrails into the legislation has long been a point of contention for privacy hawks. Republicans, in particular, became highly critical of the FISC after finding that the court approved the FBI’s warrant applications, which contained flimsy and inaccurate evidence, to surveil Trump campaign aide Carter Page beginning in 2016.

Advertisement

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, told the Washington Free Beacon, which first reported on Daskal’s appointment, that the «American people need to have confidence in the people tasked to serve as amici» before the FISC. Grassley pointed to a bill he introduced, the FISA Accountability Act, which would allow Congress to have a say in who is chosen as an amicus curiae.

Jordan and Grassley have been some of the most vocal proponents of reining in the federal government’s use of FISA after identifying instances in recent years of intelligence officials allegedly abusing their authority and infringing on U.S. citizens’ Fourth Amendment right to privacy. In the case of Page, DOJ inspector general Michael Horowitz released a report in 2019 that identified more than a dozen «significant errors or omissions» across the FBI’s four warrant applications used to surveil the former Trump aide. Daskal, in her new role, could offer confidential, weighty legal arguments to a FISC judge that support or oppose intelligence officials’ requests to surveil someone.

Sen. Grassley

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, is seen in the U.S. Capitol during votes related to the government shutdown on Thursday, October 16, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Daskal served as a top lawyer in the Department of Homeland Security when she helped launch the Disinformation Governance Board. Conservatives heavily criticized it, describing the board as a «Ministry of Truth» that sought to censor their viewpoints in violation of the First Amendment.

Advertisement

Daskal chartered the board, while Nina Jankowicz was named its executive director, an appointment that fueled Republicans’ fury over it after finding Jankowicz’ past social media posts that they said revealed she was too partisan. Jankowicz, for instance, cast doubt on the New York Post’s bombshell story in 2020 about Hunter Biden’s laptop, which she said fit a pattern of Russian «information laundering.» Biden administration officials vehemently objected to the claims in the New York Post’s story about Joe Biden’s handling of Ukrainian foreign policy, though the authenticity of the laptop itself has been verified through court proceedings.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Republicans put so much pressure on DHS about the board — calling it an «abuse of taxpayer dollars» and raising alarm that it painted policy disagreements over COVID-19, election security and immigration as mis- or dis- information — that it disbanded just a few months after its launch.

Advertisement

In Daskal’s hearing exchange with Schmitt, Daskal said «it’s not appropriate for the government to censor any points of view.» Daskal did not respond to a request for comment for this story.

fbi,judiciary,congress

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Russia urges Iran, ‘all parties’ in Middle East to show restraint amid US military buildup

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Russia warned Iran and «all parties in the region to exercise restraint and caution» Thursday amid a U.S. military buildup in the Middle East. 

Advertisement

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov made the remark as the world’s largest aircraft carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford, and its strike group are moving from the Caribbean toward the Middle East. 

«Russia continues to develop relations with Iran, and in doing so, we call on our Iranian friends and all parties in the region to exercise restraint and caution, and we urge them to prioritize political and diplomatic means in resolving any problems,» Peskov said Thursday, according to Reuters. 

«Right now, we are indeed seeing an unprecedented escalation of tensions in the region. But we still expect that political and diplomatic means and negotiations will continue to prevail in the search for a settlement,» he added.

Advertisement

WORLD’S LARGEST AIRCRAFT CARRIER HEADS TO MIDDLE EAST AS IRAN NUCLEAR TENSIONS SPIKE DRAMATICALLY

A F-18E fighter jet takes off from aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford as it sails during NATO Neptune Strike 2025 exercise on Sept. 24, 2025, in the North Sea. (Jonathan Klein/AFP via Getty Images)

The move of the USS Gerald R. Ford would place two aircraft carriers and their accompanying warships in the region. The USS Abraham Lincoln and three guided-missile destroyers arrived in the Middle East more than two weeks ago. 

Advertisement

Negotiations between the United States and Iran over the latter’s nuclear program advanced Tuesday toward what Tehran described as the beginning of a potential framework, but sharp public divisions between the two sides underscored how far apart they remain. 

IRAN FIRES LIVE MISSILES INTO STRAIT OF HORMUZ AS TRUMP ENVOYS ARRIVE FOR NUCLEAR TALKS

the USS Gerald Ford

The USS Gerald R. Ford is heading toward the Middle East as tensions with Iran escalate and President Donald Trump demands full nuclear dismantlement.  (Jonathan Klein/AFP via Getty Images)

Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said the two sides reached a «general agreement on a number of guiding principles» and agreed to begin drafting text for a possible agreement, with plans to exchange drafts and schedule a third round of talks.  

Advertisement

Yet Washington has publicly insisted that any agreement must result in the dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program — including its enrichment capacity — along with limits on Tehran’s ballistic missile program and an end to its support for allied militant groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah.

USS Gerald R. Ford travels in North Sea

The world’s largest aircraft carrier, USS Gerald R. Ford, is seen in the North Sea during NATO Neptune Strike 2025 exercise in September 2025. (Jonathan Klein/AFP via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Those demands go well beyond temporary enrichment pauses or technical adjustments. 

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Greg Wehner and Morgan Phillips contributed to this report. 



iran,russia,military,nuclear proliferation,middle east,world

Continue Reading

Tendencias