Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

House GOP moves to require proof of citizenship, photo ID to vote in federal election

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

House GOP leaders are forging ahead on legislation aimed at imposing new federal guardrails to ensure only U.S. citizens vote in national elections.

Advertisement

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., confirmed to Fox News Digital that the chamber would vote on the SAVE America Act introduced by Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, next week.

It comes after conservatives threatened to extend the partial government shutdown earlier this week if the legislation was not included in Congress’ bipartisan funding bills. But those lawmakers backed off their demands after getting assurances from the White House that the Senate would give the bill serious consideration.

SENATE REPUBLICANS PUSH TO DEPORT, DENATURALIZE FRAUDSTERS AMID MINNESOTA SCANDAL

Advertisement

Attendees listen as Rep. Chip Roy speaks at an «Only Citizens Vote» bus tour rally advocating passage of the SAVE Act at Upper Senate Park outside the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 10, 2025. (Kent Nishimura/Getty Images)

The House’s vote next week hikes the growing pressure on the Senate to take up the bill, where it will face long odds of passing. Its backers are hoping a little-known maneuver called a «standing filibuster» will be key to breaking through Democratic opposition, however. 

«These are common-sense measures that protect American voters,» Scalise explained to Fox News Digital on Thursday.

Advertisement

«Only Democrats in Congress could oppose these basic requirements that prevent voter fraud, and that’s because they want illegal aliens to vote in our elections. Why else would they support open borders, oppose deporting illegal aliens, and oppose election security like picture ID?»

The SAVE America Act is an updated version of Roy’s Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which passed the House in April 2025 but was never taken up in the Senate.

Whereas the SAVE Act would create a new federal proof of citizenship mandate in the voter registration process and impose requirements for states to keep their rolls clear of ineligible voters, the updated bill would also require photo ID to vote in any federal elections.

Advertisement
Steve Scalise at microphones next to Mike Johnson

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 5, 2025. (Daniel Heuer/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

«It’s all the same concept, right? I mean, you want citizenship, and then you want to guarantee that the person voting is the person voting. Photo ID is, I think, a critically important element to that, and we want to require that for federal elections,» Roy told Fox News Digital on Thursday.

SCHUMER FACES BACKLASH AFTER CALLING SAVE ACT ‘JIM CROW’ DESPITE PREVIOUS ALLEGATION FALLING FLAT

The bill is expected to easily pass the House — the original SAVE Act got support from all Republicans and four Democrats — but its survival in the Senate is more complicated.

Advertisement

Most legislation needs 60 votes to break through a filibuster, meaning at least seven Democrats will need to vote with Republicans to advance the bill. 

Chip Roy

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill on Oct. 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., led a small coalition of conservatives threatening to extend the most recent government shutdown if the SAVE America Act was not attached to the funding bill that President Donald Trump signed into law on Tuesday.

Luna told reporters she spoke with the White House on Monday night where she got assurances that Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., is looking at using a maneuver called a «standing filibuster» to ensure a vote on the bill.

Advertisement

It would restore antiquated filibuster rules in the Senate that require opponents of a bill to be physically present in the chamber and speaking continuously to delay its consideration. 

The move would also eliminate the need for 60 votes to break a filibuster, which currently does not require lawmakers to be present in the chamber until a vote — rather, it would end when opponents were done speaking. Each senator can give a maximum of two speeches, though without any time constraints.

The downside of such a move is that it would grind Senate proceedings to a halt until the filibuster was over. But Roy argued that any such delay in the upper chamber’s duties would fall squarely on Democrats’ shoulders.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«What we’re trying to say is that for something as important as sovereignty in our elections, we should force that question,» Roy said. «If Democrats want … a long, drawn-out, talking filibuster, then let them explain that to the American people.»

Scalise told Fox News Digital, «Once House Republicans pass this bill — and we will — I urge the Senate to quickly put it on the floor so we can send it to President Trump’s desk. The American people are demanding action — Congress must answer their call and pass this critical legislation.»

Advertisement

house of representatives politics,elections,republicans,politics

INTERNACIONAL

Dem governor under fire after illegal alien allegedly stabs woman to death at bus stop: ‘Heinous’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

EXCLUSIVE: The Department of Homeland Security is calling on Virginia’s Democratic Gov. Abigail Spanberger to ensure local law enforcement cooperates with federal immigration officials by handing over an illegal immigrant with a lengthy criminal record who allegedly killed a woman earlier this week at a Virginia bus stop.

Advertisement

Police in Fairfax County, Virginia, arrested an illegal immigrant from Sierra Leone earlier this week on charges of second-degree murder after he allegedly fatally stabbed a woman, Stephanie Minter, 41, who was found dead at a local bus stop with several wounds to the upper body. 

The alleged suspect, Abdul Jalloh, 32, also has a criminal history of more than 30 arrests, according to DHS, including for rape, malicious wounding, assault, identity theft, contributing to the delinquency of a minor, assault and pick-pocketing.   

The request from the Trump administration comes after the newly elected Democratic governor of Virginia signed an executive order to end cooperation between federal immigration officials and state and local law enforcement, a move several Democratic Party governors have taken recently amid President Donald Trump’s move to increase deportation operations around the country. 

Advertisement

The DHS request asking Virginia officials to cooperate with ICE also comes after an illegal immigrant allegedly murdered someone just days after being released from jail for a separate crime in December.

Abdul Jalloh, 32, and Gov. Abigail Spanberger  (Department of Homeland Security/Getty Images)

«We are calling on Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger and Virginia’s sanctuary politicians to commit to not releasing this murderer and violent career criminal from their jail without notifying ICE,» said Deputy Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis. 

Advertisement

«This illegal alien’s murder of an innocent, beautiful American woman came less than 24 hours before Governor Spanberger’s demonization of ICE law enforcement. This heinous criminal is a perfect example of why we need cooperation from sanctuary jurisdictions and the importance of third country removals for the safety of the American people.»

Spanberger’s representatives did not respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment. 

Jalloh entered the United States illegally in 2012, according to DHS, and immigration officials lodged an immigration detainer against him in 2020, whereupon he was granted a final order of removal by a judge who said he could be removed to any country other than Sierra Leone. 

Advertisement

ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT WITH PRIOR DEPORTATION SHOOTS DEPUTY IN CHEST, DIES AFTER EXCHANGE: DHS

Protesters face off with Minneapolis police officers in Minneapolis, Minn.

Protesters, using whistles to alert neighborhoods to ICE activity, face off with Minneapolis police officers in Minneapolis Jan. 24, 2026.  (Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images)

DHS indicated that ICE cooperation to ensure Jalloh’s deportation is evident after a case Fox News covered in December when a criminal illegal alien from El Salvador, Marvin Morales-Ortez, 23, allegedly killed a man just a day after Fairfax County jail officials let him go. 

The immigrant from El Salvador had been in custody on charges of malicious wounding and brandishing a gun, but police released him after the Fairfax County Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office, led by George Soros-backed prosecutor Steve Descano, dropped the charges. 

Advertisement

Fox News Digital reached out to the Fairfax County Sheriff’s office to inquire about why the man had not been handed over to ICE. 

The sheriff’s office said, «ICE was aware of Morales-Ortez’s incarceration and elected not to seek a judicial warrant to ensure he remained in custody.

Illegal immigrant Marvin Morales-Ortez arrested on murder

Marvin Morales-Ortez, who is living in the country illegally, was released from Fairfax County custody and then allegedly committed a murder the next day. (Fairfax County Police Department/Getty Images)

«The Fairfax County Sheriff’s Office follows all local, state and federal laws when determining whether a person is subject to release from the ADC,» the sheriff’s office told Fox News Digital at the time. «Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is automatically notified any time a person is booked into the ADC.»

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 

The same sheriff’s office did not get back to Fox News Digital’s media inquiry for this story on DHS urging officials to cooperate with federal officials. 

Advertisement

Related Article

Georgia lawmaker calls for ICE surge after Savannah teacher allegedly killed by illegal immigrant

migrant crime,virginia,abigail spanberger,illegal immigrants,immigration,deportation,crime world

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Los archivos del fallido golpe de Estado de 1981 en España reivindican la figura del rey Juan Carlos: ¿Volverá a su país?

Published

on


El rey emérito Juan Carlos, autoexiliado en Abu Dhabi desde agosto de 2020 para no salpicar a la Corona con sus escándalos, no disimula su deseo de retornar a vivir en el reino ni esconde el fastidio que le provoca no poder dormir en el palacio de la Zarzuela cada vez que visita España. ¿Acaso está por volver?

Esta semana, la desclasificación de 168 documentos vinculados al intento fallido de golpe de Estado del 23 de febrero de 1981, cuando el Borbón llevaba menos de seis años en el trono, colocó en el centro del debate político y público cuál fue el verdadero rol del rey Juan Carlos ante el levantamiento militar que la memoria de los españoles resume en una postal: la del teniente coronel de la Guardia Civil Antonio Tejero a los tiros en el Congreso de Madrid.

Advertisement

Tejero murió esta semana, a los 93 años, el mismo día en el que el gobierno de Pedro Sánchez subió a la web del Palacio de la Moncloa informes, transcripciones de conversaciones y hasta un esquema dibujado a mano de cómo se estaba planeando el golpe.

La información desclasificada no incluye audios pero sí documentos en los que se transcribe lo que el rey Juan Carlos habría dicho y ordenado a los golpistas para aplacar el levantamiento.

Como “Cualquier golpe de Estado no podrá escudarse en el rey, es contra el rey” o “Ni abdicaré ni abandonaré España. Quien se subleve está dispuesto a provocar y será responsable de una nueva guerra civil”, frases con las que el monarca habría advertido a los golpistas en la madrugada de la intentona que fracasó.

Advertisement

La desclasificación de esos documentos reivindicó, en varios sectores de la sociedad española, la imagen de Juan Carlos, el rey que en sus comportamientos personales ejerció poco la ejemplaridad que se esperaba de la Corona y que en 2014 abdicó en favor de su hijo, el actual monarca Felipe VI.

Cruce político

“La desclasificación de los documentos del 23F debe reconciliar a los españoles con quien paró el golpe de Estado. Creo que sería deseable que el rey emérito regresara a España”, expresó Alberto Núñez Feijóo, presidente del conservador Partido Popular (PP).

Advertisement

“Él mismo ha reconocido errores innegables en su trayectoria, pero quien contribuyó a sostener nuestra democracia y nuestras libertades en un momento clave debiera pasar la última etapa de su vida con dignidad y en su país”, agregó el líder de la oposición.

El gobierno de coalición progresista de Sánchez se desmarcó de las palabras de Núñez Feijóo: “Es un asunto que le compete a él (el rey Juan Carlos) y a la Casa Real. Me sorprende esta salida de Feijóo que no se entiende a qué obedece”, dijo este viernes José Manuel Albares, ministro de Asuntos Exteriores.

“Depende del él -sumó el ministro de Justicia, Félix Bolaños-. El gobierno nunca le ha impedido ni le ha denegado la entrada a España.”

Advertisement

¿Regreso al país?

La Casa Real, que suele manejarse con una discreción a prueba de bala, hizo saber que la decisión de regresar al país es “personal” del emérito que, si desea mudarse nuevamente al reino, tendría que volver fijar su residencia legal y fiscal en España.

Desde agosto de 2020, Juan Carlos de Borbón es huésped de honor del jeque emiratí que jamás le pidió rendir cuentas ni pagar impuestos.

Advertisement

Para volver a casa, el rey emérito debería revelar su fortuna, qué ingresos recibe y tributar por ese capital.

El rey Juan Carlos de Borbón confrontó a los golpistas el 23 de febrero de 1981. Foto. AFP

Antes de que se marchara de España, y cuando los escándalos por posible evasión fiscal le llegaban al cuello, su hijo, el rey Felipe, renunció a toda herencia que procediera de Juan Carlos y le retiró la asignación económica como integrante de la familia real.

Quienes conocen bien de cerca al Borbón aseguran que él se siente al día luego de las dos regularizaciones fiscales que realizó a distancia y por las que pagó unos cinco millones de euros.

Su aspiración, además, es residir seis meses por año en su país, plazo máximo para evitar tener que pagar impuestos en España.

Advertisement

Y algo más: Juan Carlos pretende volver a vivir en el palacio de la Zarzuela, “su casa”.

Parece que en su entorno de Abu Dhabi nadie le explica claramente que el palacio es sede de la jefatura del Estado y que pertenece a Patrimonio Nacional, es decir, que se mantiene con los impuestos de los españoles, erogación que él mismo intentaría evitar si regresa a su país.

“Lo que ha dicho el señor Feijóo lo pensamos la inmensa mayoría de los españoles”, se sumó a la iniciativa del líder de su partido la presidenta de la Comunidad de Madrid, Isabel Díaz Ayuso.

Advertisement

“Los delincuentes mejor fuera”, opinó el vocero parlamentario del partido independentista catalán Esquerra Republicana de Cataluña, Gabriel Rufián.

Desde que Juan Carlos duerme fuera del reino de España existe un protocolo que podría activarse en caso de enfermedad o fallecimiento del rey emérito, que en enero cumplió 88 años.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump says he plans to order federal ban on Anthropic AI after company refuses Pentagon demands

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump on Friday said he was ordering every federal government agency to stop using Athropic AI immediately.

Advertisement

«THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NEVER ALLOW A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY TO DICTATE HOW OUR GREAT MILITARY FIGHTS AND WINS WARS! That decision belongs to YOUR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, and the tremendous leaders I appoint to run our Military,» Trump began in a lengthy Truth Social post Friday afternoon.

He added, «The Leftwing nut jobs at Anthropic have made a DISASTROUS MISTAKE trying to STRONG-ARM the Department of War, and force them to obey their Terms of Service instead of our Constitution. Their selfishness is putting AMERICAN LIVES at risk, our Troops in danger, and our National Security in JEOPARDY.»

The president said he would immediately direct every federal agency to stop using Anthropic technology.

Advertisement

Secretary of War for Public Affairs Sean Parnell speaks to the media. Earlier this week, Anthropic leadership refused demands from the Department of War to use its artificial intelligence for «all lawful purposes.» (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

«We don’t need it, we don’t want it, and will not do business with them again!» he continued.

There will be a six-month phase out period for agencies such as the Department of War, he added.

Advertisement

«Anthropic better get their act together, and be helpful during this phase out period, or I will use the Full Power of the Presidency to make them comply, with major civil and criminal consequences to follow,» he wrote.

He continued, «WE will decide the fate of our Country — NOT some out-of-control, Radical Left AI company run by people who have no idea what the real World is all about.»

Earlier this week, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei refused demands from the Department of War to use its artificial intelligence for «all lawful purposes,» but Amodei said no, concerned over the possibility it could be used for «mass domestic surveillance» or «fully autonomous weapons.»

Advertisement

TOP AI FIRM ALLEGES CHINESE LABS USED 24K FAKE ACCOUNTS TO SIPHON US TECH

Trump pointing

President Donald Trump on Friday said he was ordering every federal government agency to stop using Anthropic AI immediately. (Kenny Holston-Pool/Getty Images)

«The Department of War has stated they will only contract with AI companies who accede to ‘any lawful use’ and remove safeguards in the cases mentioned above. They have threatened to remove us from their systems if we maintain these safeguards; they have also threatened to designate us a ‘supply chain risk’ — a label reserved for US adversaries, never before applied to an American company — and to invoke the Defense Production Act to force the safeguards’ removal,» Amodei said in a Thursday statement.

He declared that the «threats do not change our position: we cannot in good conscience accede to their request.»

Advertisement

Assistant to the Secretary of War for Public Affairs Sean Parnell declared in a post on X that the department does not want to engage in either of those activities but is asking to use Anthropic’s AI for all legal purposes.

«The Department of War has no interest in using AI to conduct mass surveillance of Americans (which is illegal) nor do we want to use AI to develop autonomous weapons that operate without human involvement,» Parnell said in the post. «Here’s what we’re asking: Allow the Pentagon to use Anthropic’s model for all lawful purposes.»

«This is a simple, common-sense request that will prevent Anthropic from jeopardizing critical military operations and potentially putting our warfighters at risk. We will not let ANY company dictate the terms regarding how we make operational decisions. They have until 5:01 PM ET on Friday to decide. Otherwise, we will terminate our partnership with Anthropic and deem them a supply chain risk for DOW,» he noted.

Advertisement

PENTAGON TAPS MUSK’S XAI TO BOOST SENSITIVE GOVERNMENT WORKFLOWS, SUPPORT MILITARY OPERATIONS

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei

Anthropic Co-founder and CEO Dario Amodei declared this week that the «threats do not change our position: we cannot in good conscience accede to their request.» (Chance Yeh/Getty Images for HubSpot)

Under Secretary of War for Research and Engineering Emil Michael accused Anthropic and Amodei of lying.

In a post on X, Michael called Amodei «a liar» who «has a God-complex.» 

Advertisement

«He wants nothing more than to try to personally control the US Military and is ok putting our nation’s safety at risk. The @DeptofWar will ALWAYS adhere to the law but not bend to whims of any one for-profit tech company,» he asserted.

In another post he asserted, «Anthropic is lying. The @DeptofWar doesn’t do mass surveillance as that is already illegal. What we are talking about is allowing our warfighters to use AI without having to call @DarioAmodei for permission to shoot down an enemy drone swarms that would kill Americans.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«It is the Department’s prerogative to select contractors most aligned with their vision. But given the substantial value that Anthropic’s technology provides to our armed forces, we hope they reconsider,» Amodei said in a statement sent on Thursday to Fox News Digital. «Our strong preference is to continue to serve the Department and our warfighters — with our two requested safeguards in place. Should the Department choose to offboard Anthropic, we will work to enable a smooth transition to another provider, avoiding any disruption to ongoing military planning, operations, or other critical missions. Our models will be available on the expansive terms we have proposed for as long as required.»

«We remain ready to continue our work to support the national security of the United States,» he added.

Fox News Digital’s Alex Nitzberg contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Related Article

Tech company refuses Pentagon demands on unrestricted use of its AI

politics,pentagon,donald trump,artificial intelligence,tech,technologies

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias