Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts swoops in to save Trump firing decision

Published

on


Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Wednesday agreed to temporarily halt the reinstatement of two fired federal board members, delivering another near-term win to President Donald Trump as his administration continues to spar in federal courts over the extent of his executive branch powers.

The brief stay issued by Roberts is not a final ruling on the reinstatement of the two board members, National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) member Gwynne Wilcox and Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) member Cathy Harris, two Democrat appointees who were abruptly terminated by the Trump administration this year. 

Advertisement

Both had challenged their terminations as «unlawful» in separate suits filed in D.C. federal court.

But the order from Roberts temporarily halts their reinstatement from taking force two days after a federal appeals court voted to reinstate them.

APPEALS COURT BLOCKS TRUMP FROM FIRING FEDERAL BOARD MEMBERS, TEES UP SUPREME COURT FIGHT

Advertisement

National Labor Relations Board member Gwynne Wilcox, left, and Merit Systems Protection Board member Cathy Harris, right, sued the Trump administration after they were terminated from their posts. (NLRB | AP Photo | US District Court)

Judges for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit voted 7-4 on Monday to restore Wilcox and Harris to their respective boards, citing Supreme Court precedent in Humphrey’s Executor and Wiener v. United States to back their decision. 

They noted that the Supreme Court had never overturned or reversed the decades-old precedent regarding removal restrictions for government officials of «multimember adjudicatory boards,» including the NLRB and MSPB. 

Advertisement

«The Supreme Court has repeatedly told the courts of appeals to follow extant Supreme Court precedent unless and until that Court itself changes it or overturns it,» judges noted in their opinion.

Monday’s ruling from the full panel was expected to spark intense backlash from the Trump administration, which has lobbed accusations at «activist judges» who have slowed or halted some of Trump’s executive orders and actions.

The Trump administration appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court almost immediately.

Advertisement

TRUMP’S AUTHORITY TO FIRE OFFICIALS QUESTIONED IN COURT BATTLE OVER NLRB SEAT

Supreme Court members

The justices of the U.S. Supreme Court (Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States via Getty Images)

The lower court’s decision was the latest in a dizzying flurry of court developments that had upheld, then blocked and upheld again the firings of the two employees, and it came after D.C.-based federal judges issued orders blocking their terminations. 

«A President who touts an image of himself as a ‘king’ or a ‘dictator,’ perhaps as his vision of effective leadership, fundamentally misapprehends the role under Article II of the U.S. Constitution,» U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, who oversaw Wilcox’s case, wrote in her opinion. 

Advertisement

Likewise, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras, who was presiding over Harris’ case, wrote that if the president were to «displace independent agency heads from their positions for the length of litigation such as this, those officials’ independence would shatter.»

Both opinions cited a 1935 Supreme Court precedent, Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, which notably narrowed the president’s constitutional power to remove agents of the executive branch, to support Wilcox’s and Harris’ reinstatements. 

In February, Trump’s Justice Department penned a letter to Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., stating that it was seeking to overturn the landmark case. 

Advertisement

«To the extent that Humphrey’s Executor requires otherwise, the Department intends to urge the Supreme Court to overrule that decision, which prevents the President from adequately supervising principal officers in the Executive Branch who execute the laws on the President’s behalf, and which has already been severely eroded by recent Supreme Court decisions,» acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris wrote in the letter.

Justice Department logo and Pam Bondi

In February, Trump’s Justice Department penned a letter to Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., saying it was seeking to overturn the landmark case. Attorney General Pam Bondi is shown. (Getty Images)

The Trump administration appealed the orders to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, where a three-judge panel ruled 2-1 in favor of the Trump administration, allowing the firings to proceed. 

Wilcox and Harris, who had their cases consolidated, filed a motion for an en banc hearing, requesting the appeals court hear the case again with the entire bench present. 

Advertisement

In a ruling issued April 7, the D.C. Circuit voted to block the terminations, reversing the previous appellate holding. 

SUPREME COURT RULES ON STATUS OF TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FIRED PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEES

Special Counsel of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger poses for a portrait in an undated handout image

Hampton Dellinger, a Biden appointee previously tapped to head the Office of Special Counsel, sued the Trump administration over his termination. (U.S. Office of Special Counsel/Handout via Reuters)

The judges voted 7-4 to restore Wilcox and Harris to their posts.

Advertisement

Harris and Wilcox’s cases are among several legal challenges attempting to clearly define the executive’s power. 

Hampton Dellinger, a Biden appointee previously tapped to head the Office of Special Counsel, sued the Trump administration over his termination. Dellinger filed suit in D.C. district court after his Feb. 7 firing.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

He had maintained the argument that, by law, he could only be dismissed from his position for job performance problems, which were not cited in an email dismissing him from his post.

Dellinger dropped his suit against the administration after the D.C. appellate court issued an unsigned order siding with the Trump administration.

Fox News Digital’s Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Supreme Court,Donald Trump,Law,Executive,Politics

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

El ejército de Israel comienza a rebelarse contra la ocupación total de Gaza

Published

on


El ejército de Israel tendrá que «ejecutar» las decisiones políticas sobre la guerra en la Franja de Gaza, señaló este miércoles el ministro de Defensa, en momentos en que empiezan a surgir discrepancias en sus filas ante la perspectiva de una ocupación total del territorio palestino.

En los últimos días, la prensa israelí ha revelado las reservas e incluso la oposición del jefe del Estado Mayor, el general Eyal Zamir, a la decisión del gobierno de Benjamin Netanyahu de ampliar las operaciones del ejército en Gaza para vencer «totalmente» a Hamas y traer de vuelta a los rehenes que están todavía en manos del grupo extremista desde el brutal ataque terrorista del 7 de octubre de 2023.

Advertisement

La cadena de televisión pública Kan 11 informó el miércoles que el general Zamir había advertido el día anterior, durante una reunión, que la ocupación total de Gaza supondría una «trampa».

Los medios israelíes, que citan funcionarios que pidieron el anonimato, afirman que el gobierno planea una nueva escalada de las operaciones en el territorio palestino, incluso en zonas donde podrían estar retenidos los rehenes y áreas muy pobladas.

Soldados israelíes, en la frontera con la Franja de Gaza, en el sur de Israel. Foto: AP

La orden del ministro de Defensa

Advertisement

«Es el derecho y el deber del jefe del Estado Mayor expresar su posición en los foros apropiados», comentó el miércoles el ministro de Defensa, Israel Katz.


«Pero después de que se tomen decisiones por parte del nivel político, el ejército las ejecutará con determinación y profesionalismo (…) hasta que se alcancen los objetivos de la guerra», subrayó Katz en X.

Según el diario Maariv, el general Zamir advirtió el martes que «intensificar los combates podría acarrear la muerte de los rehenes que siguen en vida» y también habría reiterado «su oposición a una decisión de conquistar completamente la Franja de Gaza», que Israel ya ocupó entre 1967 y 2005.

Advertisement

El jefe de la oposición, Yair Lapid, consideró que «la dirección que emprende el gobierno conducirá a la muerte de todos los rehenes por hambre, golpes y tortura».

Un tanque del ejército de Israel, cerca de la frontera con Gaza, este miércoles. Foto: REUTERS  Un tanque del ejército de Israel, cerca de la frontera con Gaza, este miércoles. Foto: REUTERS

Benjamin Netanyahu reúne a su gabinete de seguridad


Netanyahu reunirá el jueves a su gabinete de seguridad para tomar las decisiones finales sobre la nueva fase de la guerra, indicó la prensa israelí.


«Es necesario derrotar totalmente al enemigo en Gaza, liberar a todos nuestros rehenes y asegurarse de que Gaza ya no constituya una amenaza para Israel», afirmó Netanyahu el martes.

Advertisement

En guerra contra Hamas desde la masacre del movimiento ultraislámico palestino en su territorio en octubre de 2023, el gobierno israelí enfrenta una creciente presión para encontrar una salida al conflicto.

Netanyahu está sometido a una doble presión: en Israel, por la situación de 49 rehenes capturados el 7 de octubre, de los que 27 habrían muerto según el ejército; y en el resto del mundo, por el sufrimiento de los más de dos millones de palestinos que viven hacinados en la Franja, arrasada y amenazada por una «hambruna generalizada», según la ONU.

En los últimos días, la presión aumentó aún más a raíz de los videos difundidos por Hamas y Yihad Islámica en los que aparecen dos rehenes israelíes, Evaytar David y Rom Braslavski, muy debilitados y demacrados.

Advertisement

Más muertos en un centro de distribución de comida

En la asediada Franja de Gaza, donde entra muy poca ayuda humanitaria, la Defensa Civil reportó este miércoles la muerte de 20 personas en el accidente de un camión de víveres que se volcó sobre la multitud por la noche.


«El camión se volcó cuando cientos de civiles aguardaban ayuda alimentaria en la zona de Nuseirat, en el centro de la Franja de Gaza», informó a AFP el portavoz de la Defensa Civil, Mahmud Bassal.

Advertisement
Camiones con ayuda humanitaria esperan para entrar a la Franja de Gaza por el cruce de Rafah, en la frontera con Egipto. Foto: AP  Camiones con ayuda humanitaria esperan para entrar a la Franja de Gaza por el cruce de Rafah, en la frontera con Egipto. Foto: AP

Por su parte, Hamas denunció que «a pesar de la reciente autorización limitada de algunos camiones de ayuda, el ocupante (Israel) obstaculiza deliberadamente el paso seguro y la distribución de esta ayuda».


Esto «obliga a los conductores a tomar rutas abarrotadas de civiles hambrientos», añadió.


Al ser preguntado por AFP, un militar israelí afirmó que el ejército no estuvo involucrado en el incidente.

Caroline Willemen, una responsable de Médicos Sin Fronteras, denunció la «crisis del hambre» en Gaza e insistió en que la situación es «devastadora».

Advertisement


«Seguimos viendo a pacientes a los que les disparan, o aplastados en sitios de reparto de ayuda», agregó en redes sociales.


Israel había impuesto en Gaza un bloqueo total el 2 de marzo y lo levantó parcialmente en mayo, autorizando únicamente la entrada de cantidades muy limitadas, consideradas insuficientes por la ONU.


El ataque del 7 de octubre de 2023 provocó la muerte, en Israel, de 1.219 personas, civiles en su mayoría, según un recuento basado en cifras oficiales.

Advertisement

La ofensiva que Israel lanzó en respuesta e Gaza mató a al menos 61.158 personas, también mayoritariamente civiles, según cifras del Ministerio de Salud del territorio, gobernado por Hamas desde 2007. La ONU considera fiables estos datos.

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

‘Should have been prepared’: GOP senators fight for unified message on Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Now that the Senate has fled Washington until after Labor Day, Republicans finally have a chance to sell President Donald Trump’s «big, beautiful bill» to their constituents, but some fear that Democrats already have an advantage in the messaging war.

Advertisement

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said that Republicans could «absolutely» do better in selling the colossal bill to combat Democrats’ «lies.»  

«Well, we should have been prepared right off the bat and talked about, ‘No, we’re not talking about reforming Medicaid designed for [women, children and the elderly]. We’re looking at how we can save and preserve it and repair the damage done by the Obamacare addition to it,’» he told Fox News Digital. «We should have been talking about that, but we didn’t.»

SENATE GOP READY TO GO NUCLEAR AFTER SCHUMER’S ‘POLITICAL EXTORTION’ OF NOMINEES

Advertisement

President Donald Trump in the East Room of the White House on July 30, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

Since Trump signed the bill into law, and throughout the entire process to get it to his desk, Democrats have largely been unified in their attacks against the bill, rebranding it as Republicans’ «big, ugly betrayal,» and targeting cuts to Medicaid, food assistance and a litany of other policies.

«It’s a very unpopular bill, so if I were them, I would probably go out and start trying to spin,» Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

Messaging against the bill has become routine in Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s floor speeches, where he often targets the cuts to Medicaid touted by the GOP as reforms to a broken system.

«The more Americans learn about the Republicans’ bill, the more they are realizing that Donald Trump and Republicans sold them a raw deal,» the New York Democrat said in a floor speech last week. «The Republicans’ ‘big, ugly betrayal’ is one of the most devastating bills for Americans’ healthcare that we’ve ever seen.»

TRUMP TELLS SCHUMER TO ‘GO TO HELL’ OVER SENATE NOMINEE DEAL FUNDING DEMANDS AFTER NEGOTIATIONS COLLAPSE

Advertisement
Schumer at the Capitol

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., turns to an aide during a news conference where he commented on Elon Musk’s criticism of President Donald Trump’s spending and tax bill, at the Capitol in Washington on June 3, 2025.  (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Polling of the bill’s favorability among Americans is also working against Republicans. A Fox News poll conducted in June after the House GOP passed the legislation found that 59% of respondents opposed the bill.

Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., charged that «90% of the media is lying» about the bill, and countered that Republicans were actually increasing Medicaid spending faster than the rate of inflation «to the tune of $200 billion a year when it’s all said.»

«This is not the first message like this that we’ve struggled to get the truth through,» he told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

«Republicans need to lean into it,» he continued. «We worked really hard, and we’re going to save and preserve Medicaid for those who need it the most. And we need to be sharing that.»

TAX CUTS, WORK REQUIREMENTS AND ASYLUM FEES: HERE’S WHAT’S INSIDE THE SENATE’S VERSION OF TRUMP’S BILL

Sen. Tommy Tuberville

Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) arrives for a Senate Republican Caucus luncheon at the U.S. Capitol in Washington on April 2, 2025. (Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., contended that Republicans shouldn’t be shy about the work they put into the bill.

Advertisement

Hawley, shortly after the bill passed early last month, held an event in his home state pushing the bill. He, alongside former Rep. Cori Bush, D-Mo., lauded the bill’s inclusion of his Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, which renewed and expanded compensation funding for people exposed to nuclear waste.

When asked if Republicans had gotten off to a slow start on selling the bill, he said that too much time had been devoted to talking «about Medicaid, for my own taste.»

«It’s less of that,» he said. «Talk about the tax cuts in this bill for working people, you know. I mean, that’s what people want. I mean, I was asked when I went home. I was asked immediately by people, ‘When are those no taxes on tips? When does that start?’ So, I mean, people are tracking it, but they’re tracking what’s for them.»

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

And Sen. Tommy Tubberville, R-Ala., charged that Democrats had «zero credibility» when it came to bashing the GOP for cuts and reforms.

«We got a lot of time,» he told Fox News Digital. «There will be a lot of water underneath the bridge. You won’t hear about the ‘big, beautiful bill’ here in another year because there’s going to be a couple more big, beautiful bills.»

Advertisement

politics,senate,donald trump

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

NATO member scrambles jets after Russian drone attack near border, as Witkoff meets with Putin

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Romania was forced to scramble F-16 jets after Russia carried out a strike just half a mile from the NATO nation’s territory.

Advertisement

The country’s Ministry of National Defense (MApN) confirmed in a post on X that Russia carried out a drone attack near its border.

«On the night of August 5-6, the Russian forces launched a massive drone attack on the civilian infrastructure in the Ismail area, Ukraine, in the vicinity of the border with Romania,» Romania’s defense ministry wrote in a post on X.

«The radar systems of the MApN detected air targets in Ukrainian space, close to Tulcea County. At 1:10a.m., the population in the north of the county was warned via RO-Alert,» the ministry added. RO-Alert is Romania’s official emergency warning system.

Advertisement

Flames and plumes of smoke in Ukraine seen from Romania as Russia continues the war.  (East2West news)

NATO JETS SCRAMBLED AMID RUSSIA’S LARGEST DRONE ATTACK ON UKRAINE

The defense ministry stated that two F-16 fighter jets took off «to monitor the national airspace,» but no «unauthorized intrusions» were detected. The ministry said it would carry out checks in the area and keep NATO allies updated in real time.

Advertisement

The drones reportedly struck oil and gas pipelines at the Orlivka plant in Odesa, Ukraine. Bright orange flames and plumes of smoke were visible across the Danube River.

Nearby Lithuania has also suffered from Russia’s war on Ukraine. Drones from Putin ally Belarus crossed into its territory, according to Lithuanian Minister of Foreign Affairs Kęstutis Budrys, who said he spoke with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.

«These repeated incidents represent an alarming sign of the spillover of Russia’s aggression against [Ukraine] onto [NATO territory],» Budrys said of the incident. «We cannot compromise the security of our country and citizens, nor the integrity of NATO airspace. We must remain vigilant, as the threat is real and growing.»

Advertisement
Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff shake hands

Russian President Vladimir Putin welcomes U.S. President Donald Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff during a meeting in Moscow, Russia Aug. 6, 2025.  (Sputnik/Gavriil Grigorov/Pool via Reuters)

RUSSIA LAUNCHED ITS LARGEST AERIAL ATTACK OF THE WAR, UKRAINE SAYS

This attack could signal that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not moving closer to reaching a ceasefire deal, despite President Donald Trump’s Friday deadline. It’s unclear whether Special Envoy Steve Witkoff’s visit will push the Russian leader to move toward peace. However, if Moscow fails to make a deal by Friday, the U.S. will impose sanctions on Russia and potentially secondary tariffs.

Trump is reportedly putting pressure on Witkoff’s visit. One person close to the administration told the Financial Times that «if Witkoff comes back empty-handed, with absolutely nothing, Trump is going to go ballistic.»

Advertisement
President Donald Trump sits with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte

President Donald Trump meets with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, June 25, 2025.  (REUTERS/Brian Snyder)

Witkoff reportedly spent about three hours at the Kremlin and, according to Russian investment envoy Kirill Dmitriev, the «dialogue will prevail,» Reuters reported.

TRUMP CONFIRMS NUCLEAR SUBMARINES «IN THE REGION» AHEAD OF WITKOFF’S RUSSIA VISIT

Before setting the deadline, Trump reportedly spoke with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy about securing a deal that would end the brutal war more than three years after Russia’s invasion. Zelenskyy later confirmed the conversation took place, saying that the «key focus» was ending the war.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«Today, we coordinated our positions – Ukraine and the United States. We exchanged assessments of the situation: The Russians have intensified the brutality of their attacks. President Trump is fully informed about Russian strikes on Kyiv and other cities and communities,» Zelenskyy wrote on X.

East2West News contributed to this report.

Advertisement



russia,nato,ukraine,europe

Advertisement
Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias