INTERNACIONAL
This state just became the latest in the country to ban sanctuary cities

CONCORD, N.H. — New Hampshire on Thursday became the first state in New England to ban so-called sanctuary cities.
«There will be no sanctuary cities in New Hampshire, period, end of story,» Republican Gov. Kelly Ayotte said at a bill signing ceremony at the state Capitol.
Speaking with Fox News Digital minutes later, Ayotte noted that the measures she signed «ban sanctuary cities in New Hampshire but also allow cooperation between all of our law enforcement and federal immigration authorities.»
New Hampshire joins a growing number of states in banning sanctuary cities, which is a term used to describe jurisdictions that put some limits on cooperating with efforts by federal authorities to deport illegal immigrants.
TRUMP SIGNS EXECUTIVE ORDER CRACKING DOWN ON SANCTUARY CITIES
Republican Gov. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire signs into law two bills that ban sanctuary cities at the Statehouse in Concord, N.H., on Thursday. (Fox News – Paul Steinhauser)
Ayotte, a former state attorney general who later served six years representing New Hampshire in the U.S. Senate, made banning sanctuary cities a key element in her successful 2024 run for governor. Ayotte’s campaign slogan was «Don’t Mass up New Hampshire,» as she took aim at neighboring Massachusetts’ more lenient migrant policies.
«I campaigned on making sure we would not have sanctuary cities here in New Hampshire, and we don’t want to go the way of Massachusetts that has had a billion-dollar illegal immigration crisis,» the governor said in her national digital exclusive interview with Fox News.
Ayotte noted that she supports «legal immigration, but when people aren’t following our laws, we need to enforce our laws and this is about public safety.»
«New Hampshire is ranked the safest state in the nation, and I was glad I was able to sign the bill banning sanctuary cities to make sure we remain that way,» the governor added.
HEAD HERE FOR THE LATEST FOX NEWS REPORTING AND COVERAGE OF THE IMMIGRATION ISSUE
The two bills were passed in the GOP-dominated state legislature mostly along party lines.
State Sen. Bill Gannon, the top sponsor in the state Senate, said that the measures would «make us an even safer place to work, live, and raise a family.»
And state Rep. Joe Sweeney, the lead House sponsor, said that «we are taking the handfcuffs off our law enforcement officers, and hopefully they’ll be able to work with our federal government, ICE, to put the handcuffs on the criminal illegal aliens that are violating and disobeying our laws.»
President Donald Trump repeatedly took aim at sanctuary cities as he made the issue of illegal immigration a key component to his successful 2024 campaign to win back the White House.
And Trump last month signed an executive order putting some muscle behind his threat to pull federal funding from sanctuary cities.
Some Democrats in New Hampshire, who opposed the measure, pointed to Trump’s efforts in the nation’s capital.
WHAT AYOTTE TOLD FOX NEWS ABOUT SECURITY THE NATION’S NORTHERN BORDER
«What this bill does, under the guise of enabling New Hampshire law enforcement to support federal immigration efforts, is to make our state a willing accomplice in a politically manufactured campaign of state terrorism against a group of people, the vast majority of whom came here not to victimize America, but because they love America and they believe America is good,» state Rep. David Meuse told reporters.

Republican Gov. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire highlights her state’s status as the safest in the nation as she signs into law two bills that ban sanctuary cities, at the Statehouse in Concord, N.H., on Thursday. (Fox News – Paul Steinhauser)
But Ayotte, asked about the lack of support from across the political aisle for the two bills, said, «I don’t understand where the Democrats are on these policies.»
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
According to the New Hampshire Municipal Association, there are no sanctuary cities in the state, while a handful of cities and towns in the state have described themselves as «welcoming cities» that encourage a welcoming environment for all people, regardless of their race, ethnicity or origin.
But state Republican lawmakers pointed to between nine and 12 cities and towns in New Hampshire that they have identified over the years as welcome or sanctuary cities.
Immigration,Illegal Immigrants,New Hampshire,Donald Trump,Republicans,Governors
INTERNACIONAL
Cómo las noticias falsas e imágenes creadas con IA multiplicaron el pánico tras la muerte del capo más poderoso de México

INTERNACIONAL
Biden-appointed judge who slapped down Trump deportation policy previously rebuked by SCOTUS

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A federal judge appointed by former President Joe Biden on Thursday again ruled against the Trump administration’s third-country deportation policy, months after the Supreme Court blocked his earlier decision and rebuked him in a rare follow-up order.
The Supreme Court not only stayed Boston-based Judge Brian Murphy’s injunction over the same deportation policy in a 6-3 order last June, but the high court followed up with a second 7-2 order a week later admonishing the judge for flouting its decision. Murphy’s latest ruling is also likely to land before the justices, setting up a fresh test of the judge’s decisions in the high-stakes case.
Murphy, who was confirmed by the Senate along party lines, had issued a sweeping 81-page decision on Thursday finding that the Department of Homeland Security’s process for deporting migrants to third countries (countries that are not specified in the migrants’ removal orders) was unlawful because it violated the migrants’ due process by not giving them enough time to raise fears that they could be tortured in the country they are sent to.
Judge Brian E. Murphy speaks at his Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on April 17, 2024. (U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary)
Murphy’s decision came after the judge last year issued a preliminary injunction that also blocked DHS from deporting migrants to third countries under the department’s current protocols. The Supreme Court’s order in June halted that decision, but, pointing to a technicality, Murphy said that a separate subsequent ruling he made on May 21 specifically addressing six migrants bound for South Sudan was still «in full force and effect» despite the high court’s stay.
The judge’s move led the Department of Justice to ask the Supreme Court for clarification, and the high court responded by issuing its follow-up 7-2 opinion saying Murphy could not block DHS from deporting the six migrants.
«Our June 23 order stayed the April 18 preliminary injunction in full. The May 21 remedial order cannot now be used to enforce an injunction that our stay rendered unenforceable,» the Supreme Court’s majority wrote.
In an unusual move, the majority also noted that if the government needed further help to stop Murphy’s interference, it could seek a writ of mandamus, a rare legal tool used by a higher court to force a lower court judge to follow the law.

Department of Homeland Secretary Kristi Noem (Getty Images/Alex Brandon)
The high court said it expected Murphy to «now conform [his] order to our previous stay and cease enforcing the April 18 injunction through the May 21 remedial order.»
Justice Elena Kagan, an Obama appointee who agreed with Murphy’s initial decision to block the deportations, sided with the majority in agreeing that the judge had acted defiantly.
«I do not see how a district court can compel compliance with an order that this Court has stayed,» Kagan wrote in a concurring opinion.
FEDERAL JUDGE RULES AGAINST DHS ON WARRANTLESS IMMIGRATION ARRESTS IN OREGON

Justice Elena Kagan joined the Supreme Court in 2010 after being nominated by former President Barack Obama. (Reuters/Jonathan Ernst)
The DOJ had fumed over Murphy’s attempt to block the deportation of the six migrants. Solicitor General John Sauer described it as a «lawless act of defiance» of the Supreme Court’s authority when seeking clarification from the high court.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
«For over two months now, the Executive has labored under an injunction that this Court yesterday deemed unenforceable,» Sauer wrote. «This Court should immediately make clear that the district court’s enforcement order has no effect, and put a swift end to the ongoing irreparable harm to the Executive Branch and its agents, who remain under baseless threat of contempt as they are forced to house dangerous criminal aliens at a military base in the Horn of Africa that now lies on the borders of a regional conflict.»
Murphy said in his ruling Thursday that DHS’s deportation policy was «not fine nor is it legal.» During the prior administration, when Murphy was appointed to the federal bench, Biden sought to undo Trump’s strict immigration policies, leading to nearly 10 million migrant encounters at the southern border. Biden also faced criticism for lax policies that involved releasing millions of migrants into the country during his tenure while they awaited immigration hearings. Border encounters have dropped dramatically since Trump retook office.
Murphy stayed his ruling for 15 days to give the Trump administration time to appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit, given what the judge acknowledged was the «importance» and «unusual history» of the case.
Fox News Digital’s Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report.
supreme court,judiciary,immigration,deportation,justice department
INTERNACIONAL
Iran rejects Trump demands despite ‘significant progress’ in nuclear talks

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Talks between Iran and the U.S. wrapped up in Geneva Thursday as officials cited «significant progress» and announced a next meeting set for Vienna within days.
Yet despite senior U.S. officials describing the third round as «positive,» per Axios, Iranian state television also reported that Tehran will continue enriching uranium and rejected proposals to transfer it abroad.
According to The Associated Press , the reports claimed Iran would also push for the lifting of international sanctions — signaling it is not prepared to meet President Donald Trump’s demands.
The negotiations were carried out primarily indirectly, with Omani Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi relaying messages between the two sides.
Oman’s Foreign Affairs’ Minister Badr bin Hamad al-Busaidi gives a thumbs up as he leaves his hotel to reach Oman’s ambassador residency for new round of talks between the United States and Iran to address Iran’s nuclear program. (Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP via Getty Images)
In a post on X, al-Busaidi confirmed that the round had concluded and said discussions would resume soon.
«We have finished the day after significant progress in the negotiation between the United States and Iran,» he said on X.
«We will resume soon after consultation in the respective capitals. Discussions on a technical level will take place next week in Vienna. I am grateful to all concerned for their efforts: the negotiators, the IAEA, and our hosts, the Swiss government,» al-Busaidi said.
There was no immediate public statement from U.S. or Iranian officials after the session.
LEAVITT SAYS TRUMP CHOOSES DIPLOMACY FIRST FOR IRAN, BUT REMAINS ‘WILLING TO USE’ LETHAL FORCE IF NECESSARY

Special envoy Steve Witkoff (C) and Jared Kushner (L) meet with Oman’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Sayyid Badr bin Hamad Albusaidi (R) in Geneva, Switzerland, to discuss ongoing diplomatic negotiations on Thursday, Feb. 26, 2026. (Oman Ministry of Foreign Affairs/X)
Trump’s special Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, attended the three-hour negotiations with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.
IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi was also involved, with Iranian officials presenting a draft proposal for a potential nuclear agreement with the U.S., which has key demands.
Iran insists it has the right to enrich uranium and has appeared to refuse to negotiate over other issues, including its long-range missile program and support for armed groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah.
TRUMP ADMIN RAMPS UP ‘MAXIMUM PRESSURE’ IRAN SANCTIONS AHEAD OF NEW ROUND OF NUCLEAR TALKS

Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei pictured sitting next to a senior military official in Iran. (Getty Images)
Trump, meanwhile, insists on a deal to curb Iran’s nuclear program. In his State of the Union address Feb. 24, the president said he prefers a diplomatic solution.
«My preference is to solve this problem through diplomacy, but one thing is certain: I will never allow the world’s number one sponsor of terror, which they are by far, to have a nuclear weapon,» the president said. «Can’t let that happen.»
As the Geneva talks unfolded Thursday, Ali Shamkhani, a senior adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, also wrote on X that if the main U.S. concern is preventing a nuclear weapon, that stance «aligns» with Khamenei’s fatwa and Iran’s defensive doctrine.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
He added that Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has «sufficient support and authority» to come to a final agreement in the talks.
The development came as the U.S. continues assembling military assets, including a fleet of aircraft and warships in the Middle East.
Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House for comment.
iran,ali khamenei,middle east,sanctions,nuclear proliferation,donald trump
POLITICA2 días agoJorge Macri prepara su discurso para abrir el año legislativo: el deseo de reelección y el espejo en Bukele
POLITICA3 días agoDaiana Fernández Molero defendió la reforma laboral: “Va a haber mayor creación de empleo porque va a ser más fácil contratar en blanco”
CHIMENTOS3 días agoUno por uno, todos los famosos que saludaron a Mirtha Legrand por sus 99 años


















