Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Trump ‘doesn’t need permission’ from Congress to strike Iran, expert says

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

While lawmakers argue over their position in the command chain as President Donald Trump mulls a possible strike on Iran, one expert believes that the president is within his constitutional authority to move ahead with a bunker-busting bomb.

Advertisement

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are embroiled in debate over where they are in the pecking order. Some argue they should have the sole authority to authorize a strike, let alone declare war, while others believe that is within Trump’s purview if he wanted to join Israel’s bombing campaign against Iran.

‘INSTINCTS FOR RESTRAINT’: SENATE DIVIDED OVER WHO GETS TO DECLARE WAR

One expert believes that the president is within his constitutional authority to move ahead with a bunker-busting bombing of Iran. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

Advertisement

The predominant argument on the Hill is that the entire point of supporting Israel is to prevent the Islamic Republic from creating or acquiring a nuclear weapon.

However, a legal scholar who helped to craft the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), which authorized the usage of the U.S. armed forces to engage with the entities that then-President George W. Bush believed were behind the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attack in New York City, argued that there was a difference between Congress’ constitutional authority to declare war and the president’s authority to use force abroad.

«The position we took then, I think, is the same one that Trump should take now,» John Yoo told Fox News Digital. «As a legal matter, the president doesn’t need the permission of Congress to engage in hostilities abroad. But as a political matter, it’s very important for the president to go to Congress and present the united front to our enemies.»

Advertisement

THUNE WARNS IRAN SHOULD RETURN TO NEGOTIATING TABLE ‘IF THEY’RE SMART’

Tim Kaine

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., submitted a resolution that would require debate and a vote before any force is used against Iran. (Getty Images)

The Constitution divides war powers between Congress and the White House, giving lawmakers the sole power to declare war, while the president acts as the commander in chief directing the military. Nearly two centuries later, at the height of the Vietnam War, the War Powers Resolution of 1973 was born, which sought to further define those roles.

Yoo agreed that the Constitution was clear that Congress has the sole authority to declare war, which effectively changes the legal status of the country. However, he countered that «the framers did not think that language meant that the President and Congress are like the two weapons officers on a nuclear sub and have to turn the keys at the same time to use force.»

Advertisement

«The founders were very practical men, and they knew that Congress is slow to act, that Congress is a large body that deliberates, but it’s the president who acts swiftly and decisively in defense of the nation,» he said.

Adding fuel to the debate in Washington are a pair of resolutions in the Senate from Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., and the House, from Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Ro Khanna, D-Calif., that would require debate and a vote before any force is used against Iran. The measures are designed to put a check on Trump’s power and reaffirm Congress’ constitutional authority.

‘ANOTHER ENDLESS CONFLICT’: DEMOCRAT ECHOES TRUMP’S ANTI-WAR STANCE AS MIDDLE EAST TENSIONS ESCALATE

Advertisement
Left: President Donald Trump; Right: Rep. Thomas Massie

President Donald Trump, left, and Rep. Thomas Massie. (WIN MCNAMEE/POOL/AFP via Getty Images | Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Yoo said that the resolutions appeared to be forms of «political opportunism» and noted that when former President Joe Biden wanted to send aid to Ukraine, when former President Barack Obama engaged abroad or when Trump authorized a drone strike to kill Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, there was no resolution demanding Congress have a say.

«People on the Hill are conflating what’s constitutionally necessary with what’s politically expedient,» Yoo said. «Two very different things.»

Congress’ real power over war, he said, was the power of the purse, meaning lawmakers’ ability to decide whether to fund the Pentagon and military in their appropriations process. Republicans are currently working to ram Trump’s «big, beautiful bill» through Congress and onto his desk by Independence Day.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

Included in the colossal bill is roughly $150 billion in funding for the Defense Department.

«If Congress really doesn’t want us to, doesn’t want Trump to, get deeper involved in the Israel-Iran war,» Yoo said. «All they got to do is not fund the military.»

Advertisement

«The ironic thing is, you have people who are voting to give extra tens of billions of dollars to the Defense Department, who are then turning around and complaining that they don’t have the ability to vote on war,» he said. «Every time they vote for funding, they’re voting to make war possible.»

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Summertime and the living is uneasy on Capitol Hill

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Senate Republicans faced a choice recently: Remain in session and confirm more of President Trump’s nominees, or finally abandon Washington for the vaunted August recess.

Advertisement

Senators hung around – a little while – knocking out some of the President’s nominees for administration positions. But not all. That drew the ire of some conservatives, Trump loyalists and President Donald Trump himself.

Trump seethed at Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., for requiring the Senate to run lengthy parliamentary traps and incinerate valuable floor time to confirm even non-controversial nominees. The President finally unloaded on the New York Democrat in a digital coup de grace, telling him to «GO TO HELL!»

It’s notable that Trump has not yet met with Schumer or House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., during his second term. But then again, this is a two-way street. And Democrats remember multiple tumultuous meetings with Mr. Trump during the last time he was in office. It culminated in verbal grappling between the President and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif, and ended with Democrats abandoning the meeting after only a few moments.

Advertisement

TRUMP TELLS SCHUMER TO ‘GO TO HELL’ OVER SENATE NOMINEE DEAL FUNDING DEMANDS AFTER NEGOTIATIONS COLLAPSE

So, it’s far from certain any such meeting would yield anything remotely productive.

But back to the «August recess.»

Advertisement

First, it’s important to establish that members of the House and Senate are not on «summer vacation.» Sure, there are always some breaks to visit with family and friends. Lawmakers are people, too. But truly, this is not a «break.» Lawmakers are always «on.» Not everything they do is centered around Washington. Any congressman or senator worth their salt will tell you that spending time back in their home states or districts is just as important – if not more so – than what goes down on Capitol Hill. Meeting with constituents. Visiting businesses. Conducting town hall meetings. Stopping by local coffee bars. Breaking bread at diners. Chatting up the local press corps. 

Members also use this longer respite for political travel and fact-finding missions overseas. These «CODELS» – short for «Congressional Delegation» – are a critical function for lawmakers to build bridges with foreign leaders and make their marks on how the U.S. approaches the rest of the globe. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and former House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., have recently led groups on trips to Israel. At least one other major trip is booked for later this month.

So, the «August recess» is not inherently a «bad» thing. It’s an essential part of the job and probably one of the biggest misnomers in American politics. 

Advertisement

Still, many Americans simply dismiss August as a «vacation» for House members and senators, and it is a challenging optic for Congress.

Which brings us back to the tension between staying in session to get «something» done and returning home.

RECESS ON ICE AS REPUBLICANS HUNKER DOWN FOR HIGH-STAKES NOMINEE BLITZ

Advertisement

It’s clear the Senate could have stayed in session to plow through more of President Trump’s nominees. Schumer and other Democrats simply weren’t going to relent and allow Republicans to confirm a slate of nominees «en bloc.» That’s where the Senate greenlights a large slate of nominees all at once and approves them either by unanimous consent or via voice vote. The Senate confirms the nominees all at once. The House certainly could have stayed in session to hammer out a few spending bills ahead of the deadline to fund the government by October 1.

But here’s a stark reality – especially for the Senate:

Lawmakers and staff desperately needed a break.

Advertisement

Period. Full stop.

Since May, the Senate in particular has conducted multiple overnight, round-the-clock and weekend sessions. Not just a few. The Senate voted deep into the night or overnight on the Big, Beautiful Bill. Then the Senate was back for late-night sessions confirming nominees. 

Yes. This is the people’s business. But the floor staff and support teams were exhausted. Senate leaders were mindful of that. And that’s to say nothing of the lawmakers themselves.

Advertisement

It’s anecdotal, but lawmakers probably needed a break from one another, too. That makes them happier – and probably more productive when they return to Washington. 

But this still doesn’t solve the political dilemma facing Republican senators with a substantial core of their party demanding they remain moored in Washington to grind out nominees.

And it may not satisfy President Trump, either.

Advertisement

There’s lots of Senate talk now about «changing the rules» to accelerate the confirmation of nominees. 

One thing is for sure: the Senate won’t change the «rules» to expedite the confirmation process. The Senate boasts 44 standing rules. It takes 67 votes to break a filibuster on an actual rules change. But what Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., could do is back the Senate into a special parliamentary posture where he can initiate a new «precedent» to confirm different types of nominees. That’s a maneuver that late Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., executed to confirm some of former President Obama’s nominees. The same with former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., to confirm Supreme Court nominees.

DEMS DIG IN, TRUMP DEMANDS ALL: NOMINEE FIGHT BOILS OVER IN SENATE AS GOP LOOKS FOR A DEAL

Advertisement

«New precedents» in the Senate require some complicated parliamentary wrangling. But only a simple majority is necessary to make good on this gambit for nominees. So, it’s easier and much more plausible than «changing the rules.»

To the lay person, a new «precedent» doesn’t sound important. But there’s a reason why the Senate only has 44 standing rules and a voluminous book of precedents. You can accomplish a lot in the Senate if you’re able to concoct a new precedent.

And note that it’s not just Republicans who want to change the way the Senate does things for some lower-tier, non-controversial nominees. Some Senate Democrats have expressed interest in changes, too.

Advertisement

President Donald Trump and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., have strongly over the confirmation of a number of Trump’s nominees for various administration positions. (Getty Images)

There are only so many minutes and so many hours. Time is just as valuable to Democrats as it is to Republicans.

Everyone on Capitol Hill knows that more long nights and overnight sessions await lawmakers in September and the fall as the Senate attempts to confirm additional nominees.

Advertisement

That’s to say nothing of avoiding a government shutdown in October.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

This is why Senate Republicans elected to stick around for a bit recently – and then call it a day. Or a month.

Advertisement

After all, there is only so much time available in August.

politics,senate,house of representatives politics

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Faith under fire: Netanyahu calls out efforts to divide Christians and Israel in US

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has warned of a concerted effort in the United States and beyond to «break down» the bond between Christians and Jews.

Advertisement

Speaking at an event last month in Jerusalem attended by Pastor Paula White-Cain, spiritual advisor to President Donald Trump and head of the White House Office of Faith and Anti-Semitism, Netanyahu stated, the «partnership that promotes Judeo-Christian values, that protects Israel’s Christians as nowhere else in the Middle East. That truth is being reversed,» 

«As part of this campaign,» he continued, Israel is now being portrayed as a threat to Christians.»

Netanyahu said that Israel is home to a thriving Christian community — unique in a region where Christians often face persecution. He pointed to Nazareth as a place where Christian life is visible and open, contrasting it with Bethlehem, where the Christian population declined sharply — from 80% to under 20% — after Israel withdrew, and the Palestinian Authority assumed control, leading to reduced protections for the community.

Advertisement

TRUMP AND NETANYAHU CELEBRATE ‘HISTORIC VICTORY’ AGAINST IRAN, EYE FUTURE MIDDLE EAST PEACE

Pastor Paula White-Cain, spiritual advisor to President Donald Trump and head of the White House Office of Faith and Antisemitism (sitting next to Sara Netanyahu) meets Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife Sara at Daystar’s «Together As One» event in Jerusalem, as part of a visit organized by Niv Jacobi, President of The Meaning Channel.  (Felipe Volokita, The Meaning Channel.)

Pastor John Hagee, the influential Founder and Chairman of Christians United for Israel (CUFI), said fringe online agitators and politicians are motivated by two distinct impulses in their attacks on Israel.

Advertisement

«The true narcissists, regardless of politics, will pursue relevance through antisemitic contrarianism if they perceive themselves to be slipping from the world’s stage. Tragically, trafficking in antisemitism is one of the shortest paths to infamy,» he told Fox News Digital.

«For the true Jew-haters, Christian Zionism has been correctly perceived as the bulwark against the rise of American antisemitism. As Israel’s Minister for Strategic Affairs [Ron Dermer] has pointed out, Christian Zionism is the backbone of American support for Israel.

«Those who hate Israel and want to see it destroyed understand that the Jewish-Christian alliance prevents them from achieving their terrible aims; it’s logical then that they would seek to drive a wedge between Jews and Christians. Our relationship is a direct and unequivocal refutation of their evil ideology and aims,» he said.

Advertisement

Hagee also warned that anti-Israel narratives are being amplified online and through the mainstream media «to the exclusive benefit of Palestinian terrorists.»

DISPUTED FIRE BY ANCIENT CHURCH IN HOLY LAND SPARKS DIPLOMATIC, RELIGIOUS FALLOUT

During his speech, Netanyahu focused on some in the voices in the media. «So, Israel, the guardian of Christianity in the Middle East, is presented on American television by purchased influencers. It’s presented as the enemy of Christianity. What folly, what lies. What a travesty of truth,» he said. 

Advertisement

«We must fight for our common values, we must stand up for the truth. And by standing up for the truth, you stand up with Israel, and you stand with the Jewish people against this abomination of falsehoods,» he concluded.

Netanyahu’s comments came against the backdrop of recent allegations that extremist settlers had targeted a historic church in the West Bank, and the IDF had deliberately targeted a church in Gaza.

Christians in Israel.

Jesus the King Church in Nazareth, Israel (Photo: Pastor Saleem Shalash.)

In mid-July, the Council of Patriarchs and Heads of Churches of Jerusalem claimed that «radical Israelis» had intentionally set a fire near the Church of Saint George in Taybeh. However, Israel Police later confirmed that the ancient church ruins were undamaged and that the fire, of unknown origin, was confined to a nearby open area.

Advertisement

Separately, the IDF confirmed that a July 17 mortar strike on the Holy Family Church in Gaza was the result of an «unintentional deviation of munitions.» An investigation found that the church had been accidentally hit during operational activity in Gaza City. The military said it facilitated humanitarian aid deliveries to the church and coordinated a visit by clergy from the Greek and Latin Patriarchates.

Dr. Mike Evans, founder of the Friends of Zion Heritage Center in Jerusalem and a former evangelical advisor to President Donald Trump, pointed to the billions of dollars invested by anti-Israel actors to influence young minds on American campuses.

Thousands of evangelical Christian pilgrims pray during a prayer gathering on the Dead Sea shore in Ein Gedi on September 20, 2013, in the Judean Desert, during their annual visit to Israel to mark the Jewish holiday of Sukkot (Tabernacles) and to express solidarity with Israel. Some five thousand Christian pilgrims from around the world arrived for a week-long visit to Israel, in an annual show of solidarity with the Jewish state. 

Thousands of evangelical Christian pilgrims pray during a prayer gathering on the Dead Sea shore in Ein Gedi on September 20, 2013, in the Judean Desert, during their annual visit to Israel to mark the Jewish holiday of Sukkot (Tabernacles) and to express solidarity with Israel. Some five thousand Christian pilgrims from around the world arrived for a week-long visit to Israel, in an annual show of solidarity with the Jewish state.  (Menahem Kahana/AFP via Getty Images)

EVANGELICAL LEADERS PRAISE TRUMP’S CONTINUED SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL AMID WAR WITH IRAN

Advertisement

«The bottom line on this narrative is that there’s a belief system that Israel’s existence is illegitimate. They don’t say this about any other country in the world, no matter how bloody its origins. This belief system gets Jews killed. Anti-Zionism is antisemitism,» he said.

«My message to Bible-believing Christians is to teach a biblical worldview that Israel is the Bible land. The church in Germany was evangelical Protestant. They aligned with the Nazi party, had swastikas on its altars, and believed that God sent the chancellor.

«This happened because they rejected a biblical worldview and bought into what is called ‘replacement theology.’ That’s the reason why I have developed a significant curriculum to teach the church and its leaders,» Evans noted.

Advertisement

David Parsons, Senior Vice President and Spokesman of the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem (ICEJ), told Fox News Digital that Christian support for Israel — rooted in decades, if not centuries, of history—has grown to unprecedented levels, though it is being heavily tested amid the war against Hamas in Gaza.

«It predates Trump and Netanyahu, it will be there after those leaders are gone,» he said.

Anti-Israel protest on Columbia University campus

Students at Columbia University participate in an anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian protest. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

«We have to pass the baton to a new generation, and this is where the challenge is coming, as a lot of the young Christians aren’t buying into the same rationale as their parents to support Israel, which a lot of it was based on certain prophetic scenarios and prophecy charts about Israel’s role,» he continued.

Advertisement

«We see it as God being faithful to his covenant promises to the patriarch Abraham 4,000 years ago. If God is faithful to what he promised Jewish people millennia ago, then he will be faithful to what he’s promised us under the new covenant,» he said.

Parsons noted that bringing young Christians to experience Israel firsthand helps cultivate that connection.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

Advertisement

«A lot of the young evangelical supporters of Israel are not in some of these elite universities where they’re being poisoned against Israel, and so we have hope,» he said.

«When you see the amazing things that Israel has done — the pager operation [against Hezbollah], how they defeated Iran in 12 days — if you’re a young person, you have to be impressed with Israel’s creativity and ingenuity,» he continued. «Eventually, once we get a resolution of the Gaza situation, there will be a whole new generation of Christians that are curious enough to come and check it out.»

Advertisement



israel,christianity religion,anti semitism,conflicts

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

La guerra Rusia-Ucrania: Donald Trump analiza invitar a Volidimir Zelenski a su encuentro con Vladimir Putin en Alaska

Published

on


El presidente estadounidense, Donald Trump, aún analiza invitar al mandatario ucraniano, Volodimir Zelenski, al encuentro del próximo viernes en Alaska con su homólogo ruso, Vladimir Putin, según reportaron este domingo medios como NBC, CNN y NewsNation que citan fuentes del Gobierno.

Trump no ha descartado por completo incluir a Zelenski en la reunión, reportó CNN con base en dos fuentes cercanas, mientras que fuentes señalaron a NBC que en la Casa Blanca «se está discutiendo» la invitación, lo que no se ha confirmado de forma oficial.

Advertisement

De concretarse la participación de Zelenski, los funcionarios aún no saben si habría «una cumbre trilateral» o si habría un diálogo por separado a la conversación entre Trump y Putin.

Los reportes trascienden tras confirmarse el viernes pasado que la primera reunión entre Putin y un presidente estadounidense desde que comenzó la guerra de Ucrania en febrero de 2022 será el próximo 15 de agosto en Alaska, aunque aún faltan los detalles logísticos.

El encuentro se concretó tras la visita del enviado de la Casa Blanca para misiones de paz, Steve Witkoff, a Moscú el pasado jueves, el día antes de que expirase el ultimátum dado por Trump para que Rusia tomase medidas para terminar la guerra, so pena de nuevas sanciones.

Advertisement

El presidente ucraniano reaccionó a la reunión al afirmar el sábado que las decisiones que se toman sin Ucrania son contrarias a la paz y «nacen muertas».

Apoyo europeo

Mientras que los líderes de Reino Unido, Francia, Alemania, Italia, Polonia y Finlandia, y la presidenta de la Comisión Europea, Ursula Von der Leyen, advirtieron en un comunicado el sábado que «el camino a la paz en Ucrania no puede ser decidido sin Ucrania»

Advertisement

El mandatario ucraniano dijo haber conversado con su homólogo francés, Emmanuel Macron, que afirmó en la red X que «el futuro de Ucrania no puede decidirse sin los ucranianos».

El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, y el presidente de Ucrania, Volodimir Zelenski, se estrechan la mano durante una reunión paralela a la cumbre de la OTAN en La Haya, Países Bajos, el 25 de junio de 2025. Foto Reuters

El domingo, los principales líderes europeos firmaron una declaración afirmando que «solo un enfoque que combina diplomacia activa, apoyo a Ucrania y presión sobre la Federación Rusa» podrá poner fin a la guerra.

«Aplaudimos el trabajo del presidente Trump por detener la masacre en Ucrania» y «estamos listos para apoyar ese trabajo en el plano diplomático, además de mantener nuestro sustancial apoyo militar y financiero a Ucrania» así como «manteniendo e imponiendo medidas restrictivas contra la Federación Rusa», indicaron los líderes europeos.

Advertisement

Entre los firmantes de la declaración figuran Macron, la italiana Giorgia Meloni, el alemán Fiedrich Merz, el polaco Donald Tusk y el británico Keir Starmer, además de la presidenta de la Comisión Europea, Ursula von der Leyen.

«Esperamos y suponemos que el gobierno ucraniano, que el presidente Zelenski, formarán parte de este encuentro», dijo el canciller alemán en una entrevista a la televisión ARD.

Por su parte, la jefa de la diplomacia de la Unión Europea, Kaja Kallas, anunció una reunión de urgencia el lunes de los ministros de Exteriores del bloque.

Advertisement

«Cualquier acuerdo entre Estados Unidos y Rusia debe incluir a Ucrania y a la UE, pues se trata de la seguridad de Ucrania y de toda Europa», dijo en un comunicado el domingo, recordando que «el derecho internacional es claro: todos los territorios ocupados temporalmente pertenecen a Ucrania».

Las tres rondas de negociaciones entre Rusia y Ucrania celebradas este año no dieron frutos, y sigue sin estar claro si una cumbre contribuirá a acercar la paz.

La invasión rusa de Ucrania de febrero de 2022, ha dejado decenas de miles de muertos, millones de desplazados y grandes destrozos.

Advertisement

Putin se ha resistido a los múltiples llamamientos de Estados Unidos, Europa y Ucrania para que se declare un alto el fuego.

La cumbre en Alaska, un territorio que Rusia vendió a Estados Unidos en 1867, sería la primera entre los presidentes en ejercicio de Estados Unidos y Rusia desde que Joe Biden se reunió con Putin en Ginebra en junio de 2021.

Trump y Putin se reunieron por última vez en 2019 en una cumbre del G20 en Japón durante el primer mandato del estadounidense, aunque han hablado por teléfono en varias ocasiones desde enero.

Advertisement

Después de más de tres años de combates, las posiciones ucranianas y rusas siguen siendo irreconciliables.

Para poner fin al conflicto, Moscú exige que Ucrania ceda cuatro regiones parcialmente ocupadas (Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporiyia y Jersón), además de Crimea, anexionada en 2014, y que renuncie a los suministros de armas occidentales y a cualquier adhesión a la OTAN.

Estas exigencias son inaceptables para Ucrania, que exige la retirada de las tropas rusas de su territorio y garantías de seguridad occidentales. Esto incluiría más suministros de armas y el despliegue de un contingente europeo, a lo que Rusia se opone.

Advertisement

Estados Unidos,Donald Trump,Volodímir Zelenski,Vladimir Putin,Guerra Rusia-Ucrania

Continue Reading

Lo ultimo en Noticias

Tendencias