President Donald Trump has hailed the newly signed Iran memorandum of understanding (MOU) as a breakthrough that normalizes relations between the two countries after months of fighting. 

But by the White House’s own account, the agreement settles few of the issues that dominated months of negotiations, leaving sanctions relief, frozen assets and Iran’s nuclear program for a new round of talks.

«This is really just the first MOU and then we’re going to launch into the real technical discussions later this week,» a senior administration official told reporters Monday. 

The memorandum, signed digitally by Trump and Vice President JD Vance Sunday, kicks off a 60-day period for technical talks aimed at a final agreement. A formal signing ceremony with U.S. and Iranian officials, along with Pakistani and Qatari mediators, is planned for Friday. Yet even administration officials acknowledge that the memorandum leaves many of the most contentious issues unresolved. 

«We’ll know over the next two to three weeks whether those understandings will turn into an actual agreement,» a senior administration official said. 

TRUMP MAY HAVE WON A STRATEGIC PAUSE IN IRAN. NOW COMES THE HARD PART

Nate Swanson, a former senior advisor on Iran policy to successive administrations and now a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, said the memorandum appears to postpone rather than resolve disputes over sanctions relief, Iran’s nuclear program and the future of the Strait of Hormuz.

«It does not appear to resolve the core issues surrounding the mechanics of the Strait of Hormuz, Iranian nuclear concessions, or Iranian financial incentives and sanctions relief,» Swanson wrote in an analysis published by the Atlantic Council.

The remark was striking given that U.S. and Iranian officials have been negotiating since the April ceasefire and already had announced a signed memorandum and upcoming signing ceremony.

The president expressed optimism for a final deal.

«I think it’s going to happen, fairly on time, but we’ve been both involved. I think they’re going to want to get it done. Iran wants to get it done. They have to get back to business. And the relationship is now normalized,» Trump said during the G7 Summit in Évian-les-Bains, France.

JD VANCE REVEALS DETAILS OF US-IRAN DEAL, ADDRESSES WHETHER TAXPAYER MONEY WILL GO TO TEHRAN

The administration has yet to publicly release the text of the memorandum, but officials indicated that many of the issues that have dominated months of negotiations remain subject to future talks, including sanctions relief, frozen Iranian assets and the disposition of Iran’s remaining enriched uranium stockpiles.

«Here’s what it says: Iran will never have a nuclear weapon. That’s what it says. It won’t have one to buy, to develop. They will not have a nuclear weapon,» Trump told reporters Tuesday. 

Administration officials said Monday the text of the deal would be released Tuesday or Wednesday.

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf signed the deal along with the U.S. (Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters)

On perhaps the most disputed issue, White House officials insisted Monday that no frozen Iranian assets have been released, despite reports in Iranian state-linked media that Iran could gain access to roughly $24 billion in blocked funds during the negotiation period.

«The very simple fact is, $0 of unfrozen assets have been released by the United States or any other country.»

The administration also said it will maintain its current military posture in the region during the negotiations, despite Iranian accounts suggesting the framework contemplates a future reduction in U.S. forces around Iran.

«The plan is to keep the current force posture during the 60-day negotiations.»

Officials repeatedly stressed that any concessions would be tied to verification rather than promises.

«We’re still at the early phases where we’re building trust.»

«This memorandum does not mean trusting the enemy; it has been written with active distrust,» Iranian deputy foreign minister Kazem Gharibabadi said, according to Iranian state-linked Mehr News. «We will monitor the implementation of US commitments.»

The clearest immediate effect appears to be the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic waterway through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas shipments normally pass, and a commitment by both sides to preserve the ceasefire while negotiations continue. Oil prices fell to their lowest levels in three months on the agreement to lift the blockade and open the strait. 

Administration officials repeatedly described the memorandum as a framework that could eventually lead to sanctions relief, economic normalization and a broader settlement of Iran’s nuclear program — if negotiators can reach a final agreement in the coming weeks.

U.S. Central Command shared footage of strikes targeting airplanes amid the Iran conflict. (US Central Command)

«Nothing is on the table if it doesn’t come along with real performance.»

Iranian state-linked media have described the framework as already containing commitments on sanctions relief, access to roughly $24 billion in frozen assets, future reductions in U.S. military forces in the region and a $300 billion reconstruction program. The White House has disputed key elements of that characterization.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«We don’t pay them — there was some statement. We’re going to spend $300 billion. No, we’re allowed to go and invest if we wanted to. Someday, in the future. We have no obligation whatsoever,» Trump said during the G7 Summit.

The competing descriptions underscore how much remains unsettled.  

«There will likely be a significant delta between the aspirations outlined in the MOU and what emerges in a final deal,» Swanson said. 

Some congressional Republicans already are questioning whether Washington and Iran are describing the same agreement.

«I think we’d all like to see the terms of the memorandum and hopefully end up with a real deal,» Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., told reporters at the Capitol Tuesday. 

«I don’t think there’s anybody in Congress that’s ever gonna support giving money to them,» he went on. 

«They ought pay for what it cost us to do this to bring them to their senses to stop killing us … I want to get reimbursed for the money we’ve had to spend to bring them to their senses. They’ve got plenty of oil, they can rebuild their own country.»

«I am pleased to hear the memorandum of understanding with Iran to allow the Strait of Hormuz to open has been agreed to. I will be watching closely the ensuing negotiations regarding Iran’s nuclear program and other matters. I am somewhat concerned that Iran’s view of the agreement seems different than what the American negotiating team is claiming.»

Más de 26 mil familias de zonas vulnerables de Santiago recibieron alimentos durante una jornada de cinco días organizada por la Dirección de Asistencia Social y Alimentación Comunitaria (Dasac) en República Dominicana. Esta iniciativa, parte de las acciones sociales del gobierno, tiene el objetivo de apoyar a los hogares que enfrentan mayores dificultades económicas y fortalecer la seguridad alimentaria en comunidades identificadas como prioritarias.

La medida consiste en la entrega directa, casa por casa, de kits de raciones alimenticias crudas. Cada kit contiene productos básicos que permiten a las familias preparar comidas en sus hogares. De acuerdo con información oficial de Dasac, los alimentos distribuidos están destinados a cubrir las necesidades inmediatas de los beneficiarios y forman parte de una política sostenida de asistencia social impulsada por el gobierno nacional.

Entre los sectores de Santiago beneficiados en esta jornada figuran Camboya, Rafey, Ensanche Libertad, Ensanche Bermúdez, Los Pepines, Suelo Duro, Ensanche Mirador, La Yagüita de Pastor, El Hoyo, Bella Vista, Santa Lucía, Pekín y Cristo Rey. También se realizaron entregas en comunidades como La Otra Banda, Villa Liberación y Baracoa. La selección de las zonas se realizó a partir de un diagnóstico previo que identificó los sectores con mayor vulnerabilidad y necesidad de apoyo alimentario.

El director de Dasac, Edgar Augusto Féliz Arbona, explicó que el operativo responde a la política gubernamental de garantizar la seguridad alimentaria de las familias con menos recursos. “Continuamos trabajando con la gente, llevando apoyo y soluciones integrales a las familias que más lo necesitan”, señaló Féliz Arbona al destacar la importancia del acompañamiento permanente a los hogares beneficiarios.

La jornada de entrega de alimentos incluyó la presencia del presidente Luis Abinader, quien participó en un encuentro con más de 400 estudiantes de centros educativos públicos y privados de Santiago. Durante esta actividad, los estudiantes recibieron un almuerzo preparado por los Comedores Comunitarios, reforzando así el componente alimentario de la estrategia social gubernamental.

Adicionalmente, las acciones incluyeron actividades específicas para madres de la región. El programa “Madres que Sostienen, Alimentan y Protegen” se desarrolló en los municipios de Tamboril, Baitoa y Gran Arena del Cibao, con el propósito de brindar apoyo directo a mujeres responsables de hogares y fortalecer su capacidad de cuidado y alimentación familiar.

Según datos oficiales, los equipos de Dasac mantuvieron presencia constante en las comunidades intervenidas para asegurar que la ayuda llegara directamente a los hogares identificados como prioritarios. La institución informó que este tipo de operativos continuará realizándose en otros sectores de Santiago y en diferentes provincias del país, en el marco de los programas de asistencia social diseñados para ampliar su alcance y cobertura.

La entrega de alimentos forma parte de una serie de acciones que buscan mitigar los efectos de la vulnerabilidad social y garantizar el acceso a productos básicos para quienes más lo necesitan en República Dominicana. Las autoridades han reiterado su compromiso de mantener y fortalecer este tipo de iniciativas en beneficio de las familias más afectadas por la inseguridad alimentaria.

Colorado has reversed a controversial requirement that attorneys using the state’s court e-filing system certify they would not use court information to assist federal immigration enforcement efforts.

The verification requirement was removed from state law last week after Colorado Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed House Bill 26-1276, creating a carveout for attorneys seeking to use the filing system.

Multiple attorneys spoke out in April after the state’s e-file system required them to certify they would not share such personal information with the federal government — a requirement Colorado officials said stemmed from the Protect Civil Rights Immigration Status Act of 2025.

Colorado Springs attorney Ian Speir told Fox News Digital that Colorado appeared to be «unlawfully coopting private attorneys across the state to further its anti-federal sanctuary policies,» while noting that he doesn’t practice criminal nor immigration law but couldn’t sign into the state court system without «saluting the resistance.»

COLORADO LAWYERS SAY COURT E-FILE SYSTEM NOW MAKES THEM CERTIFY THEY WON’T ASSIST ICE

The House Judiciary Committee took note of Fox News Digital’s reporting on the matter and notified Colorado officials in April that their immigration-related certification wrongly «commandeers private attorneys into Colorado’s radical sanctuary policies, handcuffs federal officials from enforcing immigration law in Colorado, and violates fundamental free speech principles.»

Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Calif., the chairman of the Judiciary Committee’s immigration integrity, security and enforcement subcommittee, told Fox News Digital in a Monday interview that he was pleased to see Colorado reverse itself but warned that the incident is just the latest volley in sanctuary states’ battle against federal supremacy.

He called it the latest example of the notion that any state «can obstruct federal laws they don’t like.»

REP JIM JORDAN, REP TOM MCCLINTOCK: DEMOCRATS THINK THEY CAN OVERRULE LAWS

«I think they’ve crossed the line into obstruction by forbidding attorneys access to the court system without this outrageous pledge under penalty and perjury that they wouldn’t report any information for federal immigration enforcement purposes,» McClintock said.

«Obviously, the state recognized what tenuous ground they had staked out, and it reversed themselves. But I remain concerned over what other sanctuary jurisdictions that comprise this new ‘Confederacy’ may take in the future.»

FIRE, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, celebrated the news and noted it was prepared to file a lawsuit against the state government in Denver on First Amendment grounds if it did not repeal the provision.

«Colorado made the right move removing the certification requirement, which was a clear viewpoint-based regulation that violated the First Amendment,» the Washington-based group said in a statement.

Speir added that while the state may be able to tell its own public lawyers what to say to ICE, he, as a private attorney, «work for my clients, not the government.»

Greg Greubel, FIRE’s senior attorney, said in a statement that the government by law cannot condition an attorney’s access to courts «on a promise not to use information for a lawful purpose the state disfavors.»

BLOODTHIRSTY VENEZUELAN GANG PUT ON NOTICE AS NEW BILL CURBS BLUE STATE SANCTUARY POLICIES

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents stand outside Delaney Hall detention center in Newark, New Jersey. 5/28/26. (Rashid Umar Abbasi for Fox News Digital.)

 «Kudos to Colorado legislators and the governor for acting quickly to resolve this issue, but it’s troubling that the state attempted this in the first place.»

Laws restricting speech must be viewpoint-neutral under the First Amendment, but critics argued that by forcing attorneys not to speak with ICE, they were putting their thumb on the partisan scale.

McClintock said his panel’s focus continues to be on the variety of sanctuary policies in states and cities that are «resisting and in many cases obstructing federal law enforcement,» citing the Supremacy Clause’s assertion that immigration falls under the federal government’s authority.

«That’s particularly important in regions such as mine where the local sheriffs very much want to cooperate with ICE,» said McClintock, who notably chaired the raucous hearing that featured Fairfax County, Virginia, prosecutor Stephen Descano and Sheriff Stacey Kincaid who have been lambasted for their handling of illegal immigrant-related cases.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

A measure his panel is working on would allow victims of sanctuary policies to sue those jurisdictions for damages created by the release of illegal immigrant criminals and the like.

Fox News Digital reached out to Polis and ICE for comment.