Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Vance says ‘United States wins either way’ as he defends Trump’s Iran deal against GOP skeptics

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Vice President JD Vance pushed back Saturday on criticism that the deal signed between President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian would hand Tehran economic benefits without requiring meaningful changes in the terror-sponsoring nation’s behavior.

Advertisement

In a morning interview on «Fox & Friends,» Vance brushed aside concerns raised by Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., and other Republicans who say Iran could eventually use the memorandum of understanding’s economic incentives to rebuild its military and nuclear programs. The MOU is meant to serve as a framework for a long-term peace agreement.

«I like Roger, he’s a friend of mine, but I think that he’s wrong on this,» Vance said. «What the MOU says is that if the Iranians behave over a long period of time, they could get some of the benefits of this bargain.»

Critics on both sides of the aisle have charged that the agreement signed earlier this week misses key objectives for the United States, including the dismantling of Iran’s nuclear weapons capabilities and enriched uranium stockpiles, limits on its ballistic missile program and a requirement that Tehran end its support for regional proxy groups such as Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis.

Advertisement

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and Sen. JD Vance joined family members at Ground Zero in New York City Sept. 11, 2024, to honor victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

TRUMP’S IRAN DEAL ‘GIVING A LOT MORE TO GET A LOT LESS’ THAN OBAMA’S, SENATOR SAYS

Wicker claimed the 60-day ceasefire agreement set forth in the MOU undermines the United States’ victories in Operation Epic Fury «in ways that are completely out of step with the president’s goals.»

Advertisement

«Specifically, the $300 billion fund for the reconstruction and economic development of Iran — though not funded by U.S. taxpayers — would make Iran’s payoff under President Obama’s 2015 deal look like a pittance by comparison,» Wicker said in a statement. 

Wicker argued that easing sanctions on Iran while requiring Israel to cease military action against Hezbollah is misguided, given the group’s continued attacks on Israel’s northern border and its backing from Tehran.

VANCE TOUTS DESTRUCTION OF IRANIAN NUCLEAR PROGRAM AS TRUMP ANNOUNCES ISRAEL-IRAN CEASEFIRE

Advertisement

«The Iranian regime has not renounced its ultimate goal — ‘Death to America, Death to Israel,’» Wicker said. «The regime will invest every penny it receives to further that aim.»

But Vance said critics have incorrectly assumed Iran would receive economic benefits regardless of its conduct. Sanctions relief and regional economic aid would only be considered after Iran demonstrates sustained compliance with the agreement and abandons efforts to advance its nuclear program, Vance said.

Sen. Roger Wicker departing a meeting with Senate Republicans at the U.S. Capitol

Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., departs a meeting with Senate Republicans at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on June 28, 2025, as lawmakers work to advance the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act. (Al Drago/Getty Images)

«The United States has all the cards,» Vance said. «The [Strait of Hormuz is] now open, the Iranian military is now destroyed. The Iranians have committed to, of course, destroying that stockpile of the rich material, but we have a lot of economic pressure applied to the Iranians that we would be willing to relieve if they do what we need them to do.»

Advertisement

Vance said the agreement is already delivering tangible results, citing the movement of 16 million barrels of oil through the Strait of Hormuz on Friday after the waterway reopened to commercial traffic. He said the administration is focused on ensuring Iran is permanently blocked from restoring its nuclear program.

«We’re going to go after that enriched stockpile of uranium,» Vance said. «We’re going to try to reset the situation that we have, so that the Iranians don’t just have a destroyed nuclear program now, but so that we can say with some confidence, through a combination of inspections and verification, that they’re never going to be able to rebuild that program.»

Vice President JD Vance speaking with Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff listening in Islamabad Pakistan

Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff listen as Vice President JD Vance speaks during a news conference after meeting with representatives from Pakistan and Iran in Islamabad, Pakistan, April 12, 2026.  (Jacquelyn Martin/Pool/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Vance also expressed confidence that a ceasefire between Iran and Israel would hold long enough for negotiations to continue. U.S. officials are preparing for talks involving Iranian, Qatari and Pakistani representatives, which could begin within days, according to Vance.

«There’s a fork in the road here,» Vance said. «The United States wins either way, but I think that what ultimately happens from here is very much up to the Iranians.»

Advertisement

nuclear proliferation, treaties, iran, sanctions, jd vance

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Major dispute to threaten Trump’s Iran deal over billions in frozen Tehran funds: expert

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

As U.S. and Iranian negotiators met in Switzerland on Sunday, a regional analyst warned that a dispute over billions in potentially unfrozen Iranian assets could quickly test the durability of a fledgling interim agreement.

Advertisement

The disagreement is emerging, they say, as Washington and Tehran begin implementing the memorandum of understanding signed June 17, with negotiators holding the first round of talks at Bürgenstock, near Lucerne, Switzerland.

According to Iran International, President Masoud Pezeshkian had signaled Tehran’s expectations early Sunday, saying, «$6 billion of our funds in Qatar will be returned. Trump, who tried to deny Iran its rights, acknowledged them in his recent speech.»

The dispute traces back to discussions at the G7 summit in Évian-les-Bains, France, where world leaders debated the issue.

Advertisement

TRUMP DEFENDS WAR DEAL IN MARATHON PRESSER, USING SEMANTICS ON WHY IRAN IS GETTING $300 BILLION

As U.S.-Iran talks opened Sunday in Switzerland, a dispute over who controls and monitors billions of dollars in potentially unfrozen Iranian assets emerged. (Fabrice Coffrini/Pool via REUTERS)

«We have taken their money, it isn’t our money, it is their money, and we froze it,» President Donald Trump said. «At a certain point in time, I guess we’re going to have to give it back.»

Advertisement

He also stressed that any access to the funds remains strictly conditional, writing on Truth Social that Iran would receive «not ten cents» during the 60-day negotiation period if it failed to uphold its commitments.

«There are effectively two competing narratives about the frozen funds,» Alex Vatanka, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, told Fox News Digital.

«Releasing frozen assets is not simply an economic question. It is one of the central political tests of trust between Tehran and Washington and will likely become one of the first major implementation disputes in the weeks ahead,» Vatanka added.

Advertisement

Paragraph 11 of the MOU framework states that the United States «undertakes to make fully available» restricted and frozen Iranian funds.

However, the agreement ties any release of funds to a step-by-step process based on compliance, rather than granting immediate, unrestricted access.

BIDEN ADMIN EXTENDS $10B IRAN SANCTIONS WAIVER 2 DAYS AFTER TRUMP ELECTION WIN

Advertisement
U.S. delegation arriving in Switzerland.

The U.S. delegation, including Steve Witkoff, JD Vance and Jared Kushner, arrived in Switzerland on Sunday. (Nathan Howard/Pool/REUTERS)

«First, there remains considerable uncertainty over the total amount of Iranian assets frozen abroad,» Vatanka said.

«Iranian officials often speak of more than $100 billion, while Western estimates range higher. The immediate negotiations, however, appear focused on securing access to roughly $24 billion to $25 billion as an initial tranche.»

Iran’s frozen assets are widely estimated at between $100 billion and $120 billion and held under sanctions and financial restrictions in countries including China, India, Iraq and South Korea, according to reporting by the Wall Street Journal.

Advertisement

Vatanka said the central dispute extends beyond the size of the payout.

«The real dispute is not simply about how much money Iran receives, but who ultimately controls how it is spent.»

«Iranian officials are emphasizing sovereignty over the funds, while the United States is trying to preserve leverage by attaching conditions to their use,» he added as talks got underway Sunday.

Advertisement

In a statement on X, Qatar’s Foreign Ministry said the talks are aimed at reaching a comprehensive and lasting agreement covering all elements of the framework.

Spokesman Majed bin Mohammed Al Ansari said technical teams were negotiating the final deal while oversight groups would monitor implementation and track progress.

The U.S. and Qatar are exploring a mechanism to channel an initial $6 billion toward humanitarian purchases, including food and medicine, according to reports.

Advertisement

US ECONOMIC CHOKEHOLD ON IRAN REACHES PEAK LEVERAGE AS COLLAPSE RISKS EMERGE

Hezbollah terrorists holding rifles in a group

Hezbollah terrorists holding rifles are shown in this image. A «terrorist network» funded and operated by Hezbollah and Iran was foiled in the United Arab Emirates, according to a report. (Fadel Itani/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

However, Western intelligence officials remain concerned that unfrozen funds could be diverted to regional conflicts rather than domestic development projects.

Reuters reported that Iran has already signaled to Hezbollah that increased financial support could resume if Tehran’s cash flow improves.

Advertisement

«This issue also has an important regional dimension,» Vatanka said. «Iran has pledged to direct a portion of those reconstruction funds toward supporting its weakened proxy network in Lebanon.»

«The United States has insisted that Iran cannot use any unfrozen assets to fund terrorist organizations, warning that access to the funds would be revoked if Tehran violates the terms of the agreement,» he added.

Vatanka said the two sides also remain divided over the broader purpose of the agreement.

Advertisement

«Tehran is presenting the roughly $25 billion as money that will be released gradually and invested in rebuilding the country’s infrastructure, with officials talking about roads, airports, transport corridors and projects that visibly benefit ordinary Iranians.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«Washington, however, appears to be describing something much narrower,» Vatanka added.

Advertisement

«U.S. officials have indicated they want the funds released through controlled mechanisms, primarily for humanitarian and other approved civilian purchases, rather than giving Tehran unrestricted access.»



conflicts, counter terrorism, war with iran, iran, sanctions

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Elecciones en Colombia: un triunfo ajustado que deja a Abelardo De la Espriella con un poder limitado

Published

on



La primera batalla terminó. Pero vendrán otras desde este mismo lunes y, más aún, desde el 7 de agosto, cuando Gustavo Petro termine su mandato y deje su oficina en la Casa de Nariño a su adversario y ahora sucesor, quien deberá mostrar gran cintura política en los cuatro años de gobierno que tiene por delante.

Abelardo De la Espriella, un abogado y empresario que llega a la presidencia sin experiencia en puestos políticos, no la tendrá fácil. Se encontrará con un camino sinuoso y plagado de obstáculos para manejar las riendas de este país de más de 53 millones de habitantes, con una historia de violencia, desigualdades, una enorme diversidad social y que enfrenta ahora serios desafíos económicos y de seguridad, entre otros.

Advertisement

El futuro presidente recibe un país partido en dos. Y deberá tener bien claro que su victoria no le da vía libre para hacer realidad sus promesas de campaña. Su margen de maniobra será bien ajustado y encontrará frenos en el Parlamento y en la Justicia para poder implementar algunas de sus propuestas más polémicas, especialmente en temas de seguridad.

Gran parte de los votos que recibió no fueron por convicción o adhesión ciega, sino más bien por rechazo a la opción contraria. Son muchos aquí los que han elegido por lo que creían “menos malo” y no le darán un apoyo sin condiciones.

“No va a ser una transición tranquila”, vaticinó el analista y columnista político Héctor Riveros, en diálogo con Clarín. El nuevo presidente enfrentará resistencias, y luego de una campaña que se basó en los discursos encendidos, acusaciones y golpes de efecto más que en propuestas concretas, es incierto por ahora de qué manera encarará la tarea de gobernar.

Advertisement

“Es posible que encuentre resistencia en las calles. No porque el gobierno vaya a convocar a manifestaciones, pero se han visto en las últimas semanas grupos de jóvenes, militantes de izquierda, que han salido espontáneamente a protestar contra De la Espriella. Y es posible que veamos más protestas en estos días”, señaló el experto.

El analista político Carlos Augusto Chacón, director ejecutivo del Instituto de Ciencia Política Hernán Echavarría Olózaga, coincide. “Va a ser una transición difícil. Es posible que Petro desconozca los resultados, como hizo en la primera vuelta”, afirmó.

Los retos para el próximo gobierno no son simples. El país atraviesa su peor ola de violencia en la última década. Esta campaña quedó marcada desde el comienzo por el asesinato a tiros del candidato presidencia Miguel Uribe Turbay, en junio del año pasado, y de una serie de ataques con bombas y drones explosivos.

Advertisement

Las autoridades contabilizaron 14.780 homicidios el año pasado, la cifra más alta desde 2015. Las extorsiones también se han disparado a 13.417 casos en 2025, más del doble de las registradas una década atrás.

En este contexto, De la Espriella se presentó como el abanderado del orden, el único capaz de devolver la seguridad al país. Pero el camino que plantea para lograr ese objetivo es resistido por una porción importante de la población y la clase política.

Por ejemplo, prevé cortar de cuajo con los fracasados esfuerzos de diálogo con los grupos armados en cambio combatirlos con “la fuerza de las armas”. Además, promete construir “mega cárceles”, inspiradas en las del presidente salvadoreño Nayib Bukele, para criminales y narcotraficantes.

Advertisement

Para terminar con la producción de cocaína, quiere fumigar con herbicidas biológicos los plantíos de hoja de coca. Además, adhiere a la política antidrogas de Donald Trump, incluyendo los bombardeos a embarcaciones que presuntamente trafican drogas.

Pero el futuro presidente deberá lograr consensos y negociar con un Parlamento dividido, donde las fuerzas políticas están fragmentadas y pondrán seguramente un freno a su plan de gobierno.

De la Espriella tendrá a su favor que la derecha aparece como el bloque ideológico más numeroso del Congreso. Así, ya cuenta con una base legislativa propia gracias al respaldo de Salvación Nacional, partido de ultraderecha que obtuvo cuatro escaños en el Senado en las elecciones legislativas de marzo. Y se suman los respaldos que ha recibido para la segunda vuelta de dirigentes y sectores de partidos tradicionales.

Advertisement

Pero tendrá en frente a una oposición de izquierda fortalecida respecto al actual Congreso, y de manera inevitable tendrá que consensuar apoyos, en especial para las medidas más polémicas que ha presentado en temas de seguridad.

De la Espriella también promete medidas drásticas para reducir el inmenso déficit fiscal del país, que se amplió en los últimos años por las políticas sociales de Petro, que logró reducir la pobreza y la desigualdad a costa de un enorme endeudamiento.

El mandatario electo admira la política de la “motosierra” de Javier Milei y ha prometido un ajuste feroz. Queda por ver qué margen tendrá para implementar sus propuestas. Es claro que su gobierno comienza debilitado, con una firme oposición por delante y un futuro vidrioso.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Top GOP group pumps $37M into fight on key issue dominating midterm races: ‘Much more to come’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

America Action Network (AAN), a conservative nonprofit advocacy group associated with House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has surpassed $37 million in messaging on cost-of-living issues, according to its leadership.

Advertisement

«The cost of living is the No. 1 issue on the minds of working families right now. American Action Network invested $37 million, highlighting how conservative policies deliver real relief,» Chris Winkelman, AAN’s president, said in a statement to Fox News Digital.

The renewed spending further solidifies affordability as a key issue that is expected to play a pivotal role in the 2026 midterms.

While inflation has risen in recent months, AAN believes Republicans can continue to press the affordability message as an effective way to reach voters and have highlighted the issue in several ads, narrowing in on the work Republicans have done through Trump’s signature One Big Beautiful Bill.

Advertisement

PENCE LAUNCHES GOP MESSAGING BLITZ ON ‘ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL’ AHEAD OF MIDTERMS

President Donald Trump arrives at Joint Base Andrews, Md., on Air Force One on May 15, 2026, returning from Beijing where he met with China’s President Xi Jinping. (Mark Schiefelbein/AP)

The group has been advancing messaging on the bill since it was passed in July 2025.

Advertisement

«The American comeback is here. President Trump and House Republicans are delivering for the American people, keeping their promises and delivering the change they demanded. Giving working families the tax cut ever, cutting taxes on tips and overtime and strengthening our border,» an ad states.

«It’s a new America.»

A recent Fox News poll shows 58% of voters view cost of living as their top economic worry, up from 50% of voters in Fox’s February poll.

Advertisement

Democrats have also targeted affordability, pointing to President Donald Trump’s promises of lowering everyday costs that have run into hurdles amid the fallout of the war in Iran and higher gas prices. Inflation rose 4.2% in May, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a data point House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., has repeatedly pointed out.

GAS SURGE TIED TO IRAN CONFLICT HITS SWING STATES, TESTING TRUMP’S LOW-PRICE PITCH

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaking at a press conference at the U.S. Capitol

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks at a news conference on Department of Homeland Security funding at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 4, 2026. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

«Inflation just hit a 3-year high, gas prices are out of control and life under Donald Trump is unaffordable,» Jeffries said in a recent post to X.

Advertisement

Even so, AAN and other Republican groups have blasted Democrats for opposing relief measures included in the Big Beautiful Bill, noting that, if successful, their opposition would have likely led to widespread tax increases.

That’s the view of Richard Hudson, the chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC). 

«House Democrats continue proving they’re out of touch with the concerns of everyday Americans. Republicans are focused on affordability, public safety and securing the border, while Democrats remain captive to the far-left agenda that’s failing working families,» Hudson said.

Advertisement

In one $3 million ad blitz in Florida, Virginia’s 2nd Congressional District and Washington State, AAN slammed Democrats in those areas.

«Marie Gluesenkamp Perez must have a short memory. She clearly forgot about us when she voted for the largest tax hike in American history. Perez voted against giving more money to hardworking Washington families,» the ad states in one example.

VULNERABLE DEMOCRATS HAMMERED WITH SCATHING AD HANDCUFFING THEM TO MAMDANI, JEFFRIES

Advertisement
Man standing in front of supermarket freezers looking at his phone

A man shops in a supermarket while checking his phone for low prices amid inflation. (iStock)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The group hinted that, even with the $37 million that’s already been spent, its efforts aren’t finished.

«Keep an eye out — we have much more to come later this summer,» Winkelman said.

Advertisement

midterm elections, inflation, congress, republicans elections, bills

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias