Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Proposal would pay homeowners ‘data center dividends’ to counter growing backlash

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

As opposition to artificial intelligence data centers spreads across rural America, one group is proposing «data center dividends» to counter the backlash by allowing residents to share directly in the wealth generated by the technology hubs.

Advertisement

A new report from the Bitcoin Policy Institute, a think tank based in Washington, D.C., proposes that data center dividends are a model that would return part of the property tax revenue generated by AI data centers directly to households living in the communities that host the data centers, potentially providing annual payments of between about $4,500 and $8,900 per household without creating new taxes or increasing costs for developers.

«Every American deserves to benefit from the AI boom,» Sam Lyman, head of research at the nonprofit, told Fox News Digital. «It can’t just be the developers in Silicon Valley who are becoming wealthy from this revolution. It needs to be the Americans who are building the county infrastructure that makes these data centers possible in the first place.»

The proposal comes as opposition to data centers intensifies nationwide, fomented over the past year by a network of socialists and communist nonprofits funded by a tech tycoon, Neville Roy Singham, living in Shanghai, supporting the Chinese Communist Party and a «new world order» promulgated by Chinese leader Xi Jinping. The opposition has widened to conservatives and centrists, with the report noting that Americans are now more likely to oppose a data center in their community than a nuclear power plant.

Advertisement

In a poll earlier this year, Gallup found that 71% of Americans oppose construction of an AI data center in their area, while only 53% oppose a nearby nuclear plant. The report says local data center moratoriums have exploded from six in 2024 to 59 last year and 294 last month.

Over the past year, groups in the Singham network – including the Party for Socialism and Liberation, the People’s Forum, CodePink and BreakThrough News – have opposed data centers and also Flock surveillance cameras with aggressive media campaigns, elevating China as a technological powerhouse and denigrating any developments by U.S. technology companies.

«These influence actions are cognitive warfare. Foreign actors don’t need Americans to become pro-China,» Rob Joyce, former director of cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, recently told Fox News Digital. «They need Americans to argue for the outcomes Beijing wants. And a free society that can’t build the power and govern the advanced technology is going to wind up renting it from the adversary, read the PRC, that doesn’t share its own values. And that scares me as an American.»

Advertisement

Sen Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez hold a press conference to announce the Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act at the U.S. Capitol on March 25, 2026, in Washington, D.C. (Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)

Lyman said the political problem is that many Americans believe technology companies are reaping the benefits of the AI boom while local communities bear the costs. The propaganda campaigns by the pro-China groups are promoting that message by describing tech executives as «oligarchs» and «imperialists.» One constant message in the campaigns is «People Over Profits.»

«I really think that data center dividends will reverse the momentum in the data center debate, because suddenly every American who lives in these counties where data centers might be built recognizes that he or she can have a material stake in the AI economy,» said Lyman, a former senior advisor and speechwriter for Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

Advertisement
Protesters holding signs opposing a proposed AI data center project during a public meeting in Utah.

Protesters react as the Box Elder County Commission approves a large AI data center project in Tremonton, Utah, on May 4, 2026. Activists opposed the 40,000-acre development over concerns about water use, energy demand and environmental impact. (Natalie Behring/Getty Images)

Polling cited in the report found that 73% of Americans believe the costs of data center construction outweigh the benefits, while voters overwhelmingly believe AI will primarily enrich executives and business owners rather than workers.

Rather than creating a new tax, the proposal would redirect a portion of property tax revenue that counties already collect from data centers. «Data center dividends can ensure that rural Americans rise in the age of AI alongside the engineers developing this technology,» the report notes.

AWS data center

An Amazon Web Services data center in Aldie, Virginia, on May 31, 2026. (Lexi Critchett/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Under the model, counties would first continue funding schools, roads, police and other essential services. After those obligations are met, local communities would return a portion of remaining revenue directly to residents through annual checks, direct deposits, tax credits, utility bill credits or permanent investment funds. The report emphasizes that the dividends would be financed entirely from existing tax revenue, meaning developers wouldn’t pay any additional taxes.

Advertisement

The report estimates that a single one-gigawatt AI data center could generate enough tax revenue to provide households in a typical rural county between $4,500 and $8,900 annually in a «data center dividend,» depending on how much revenue local governments dedicate to dividends after paying for public services.

The estimate is based on tax collections from Loudoun County, Va., one of the nation’s largest data center hubs. Loudoun collected about $685 million in personal property taxes on data center computer equipment in fiscal year 2024. Dividing those collections by the county’s data center electrical load produced an estimate of roughly $165 million in annual property tax revenue per gigawatt of AI infrastructure, researchers estimated.

The report cites new policies in West Feliciana Parish, La., where policymakers are attempting to spread new-found wealth. The parish expects a Hut 8 AI campus to generate about $90 million annually, more than tripling its current budget, according to estimates. Earlier this year, Louisiana lawmakers passed Act 434, allowing local officials to provide property tax credits funded by the new revenue, although lawmakers removed an earlier proposal that would have authorized direct cash payments.

Advertisement

If the cash provision had remained, the report estimates households could have received about $5,600 annually if one-quarter of the revenue were distributed, or $11,200 annually if half the revenue were shared with residents after funding government services.

In another example, Alaska has a «Permanent Fund,» or state-owned investment account that collects part of Alaska’s revenues from oil produced on state land, invests it in stocks, bonds and real estate, and disburses part of the returns to residents as an annual dividend.

Volunteers distribute yard signs opposing a data center project in Canaan Valley, W.Va.

Volunteers hand out yard signs against a data center complex in Canaan Valley on June 30, 2025, after a public meeting organized by the state Department of Environmental Protection regarding an air quality permit application for a gas-fired power plant near Davis, W.Va. (Ulysse Bellier/AFP via Getty Images)

The report outlines several options communities could adopt.

Advertisement
  • Cash payments. Residents could receive annual dividend checks or direct deposits similar to the payments from Alaska’s «Permanent Fund.»
  • Property tax credits. Local governments could reduce residents’ property tax bills using data center revenue, similar to Louisiana’s approach.
  • Utility bill credits. Counties could apply the money directly to electricity bills, benefiting both homeowners and renters while addressing concerns that data centers increase electricity costs. The report notes that a $4,500 dividend would cover the average American household’s electric bill for more than two years.
  • Education funds. Communities could place the money into scholarship endowments guaranteeing college tuition for local graduates.
  • Permanent investment funds. Counties could invest the tax revenue and distribute only investment earnings, creating an enduring source of local wealth similar to Alaska’s Permanent Fund even if the data center eventually closes.

Lyman argues that direct payments create stronger public support than simply lowering taxes or expanding government spending because residents would see the benefit. «I think a lot that opposition is born from the fact that many Americans feel left out of the AI boom. They feel like this economic revolution is taking place without them,» said Lyman, noting, «What data center dividends do… is they give every American in rural America a share in the material prosperity that is taking place with artificial intelligence.»

The report notes that rural counties possess two scarce assets essential for AI development – land and abundant power – and argues those communities should share directly in the economic gains generated by the AI buildout.

politics, artificial intelligence, technologies, taxes

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

‘Alien harboring’ accusations fly as DC-area county spends taxpayer funds to blunt ICE

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FIRST ON FOX: A Virginia county is under fire for a new policy providing taxpayer funds in the form of grants to families of illegal immigrants whose breadwinner was detained or deported by ICE.

Advertisement

Arlington County, which sits just across the Potomac River from Washington, D.C., is not new to policies critics say interfere with DHS operations, as it previously caused outrage when the chair of the Arlington County board publicly suggested residents call police to report ICE sightings in January.

«If you look at the alien harboring statute – do you do anything to encourage or induce people to either come illegally or that are illegally here to stay, that could be arguably a violation of the alien harboring statute?» former acting ICE Director Jonathan Fahey told Fox News Digital in a Wednesday interview.

DOJ THREATENS TO CUT BILLIONS IN WELFARE FUNDING FROM STATES FOR FAILING TO REPORT ILLEGAL MIGRANTS

Advertisement

Arlington County Board of Supervisors, from left, Julius D. «JD» Spain Sr., Susan Cunningham, Takis Karantonis, Board Chair Matt de Ferranti and Vice Chair Maureen Coffey. (Arlington County)

«By giving money to people… the reasonable inference is that these people are also illegal, the money enables them to stay in the country illegally, because they lost their breadwinner,» Fahey said.

He said Arlington County Manager Mark Schwartz’s comments to ARLNow that many of the affected families are «unbanked» – or lack access to financial institutions which statutorily require identification to open deposit accounts – is itself a tell.

Advertisement

TAXPAYER-FUNDED HOUSING FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS IN GOP’S CROSSHAIRS: ‘IT’S GOT TO STOP’

Illegal immigrants arrested in the DC area

Illegal immigrants are arrested by ICE officers in the D.C. area. (Courtesy of the Department of Homeland Security)

«That shows the county knows the money is going to be going to people that are illegally here and it will help them stay. So that’s where I think the alien harboring statute comes into play,» he said, adding the county shows «reckless disregard» for the fact their policies accommodate people in the country illegally.

Arlington will start by setting aside $50,000 to be distributed through «social safety-net» ministry ArlingtonThrive in increments of up to $2,000 per affected family to cover basic needs and utilities, according to reports.

Advertisement

The plan – which passed 4-0 with one board member absent – reportedly formed after a major ICE operation in Maryland and Virginia netted 1,328 illegal immigrant arrests, including the case of a man who ran from agents when confronted near the U.S. Air Force Memorial.

Five regional federal Democrats sounded off afterward, endorsing an ensuing Arlington County Police investigation into the encounter between ICE and Jose Mejia Hernandez, who was reportedly tased and suffered a brain bleed.

Fox News Digital reached out to Arlington County officials, including Chairman Matt de Ferranti, a Democrat from Rock Spring.

Advertisement

«We are valuing the families of those that have been displaced and removed,» he told local press.

In January, de Ferranti warned Arlingtonians that county law prohibits its «public safety professionals» from «interfering with enforcement of federal immigration law,» but that his suggestion to call 911 to report ICE sightings helps officials know agents are present and pivot to «pursu[ing] Arlington County’s law enforcement mission: preventing violence in our community.»

DOJ ACCUSES MARYLAND OF ‘ACTIVE AND DELIBERATE EFFORT’ TO PREVENT DEPORTATIONS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS: LAWSUIT

Advertisement
ICE arrest in Virginia

Federal immigration authorities make an arrest in Arlington, Va., in February. (ICE)

Reckless disregard and inducement are both subsections of the law Fahey referenced – 8 U.S.C. 1324.

Leadership at the Department of Homeland Security was similarly critical of Arlington’s move.

«You can’t make this up,» an agency spokesperson told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

«Sanctuary politicians are taking Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars to reward illegal aliens who break the law. This insanity shows once again who they put first.»

Fahey said counties cannot make their own immigration laws, and with Arlington in particular, their alleged «inducement» doesn’t just affect their county, as creating safe harbor for illegal immigrants can have ripple effects in adjacent areas like the District of Columbia, cities of Falls Church and Alexandria and Fairfax County.

«A person could go on and commit another crime somewhere outside of Arlington… you can’t have localities and states carving out their own immigration laws or saying immigration laws can’t be enforced [here].»

Advertisement

SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

Virginia welcome sign posted in grass near Lee Highway intersection in Rosslyn

A welcome sign is posted near the Key Bridge in Rosslyn, Arlington County, Virginia. (Universal Images Group/Getty Images)

Arguments against mass deportation on the grounds of family separation are similarly flawed, the former director said, pointing to the fact that when an American citizen is arrested or jailed, they are also physically «separated» from their family.

«Latest dispatch from the People’s Republic of Arlington,» read a critical posting on X.

Advertisement

illegal immigrants, homeland security, immigration, washington dc, politics, sanctuary cities, state and local, virginia, abigail spanberger

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Israel’s E1 plan explained: The Jerusalem-area corridor sparking international backlash

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Israel’s move to advance construction in the strategically significant E1 area between Ma’ale Adumim on the West Bank and Jerusalem has triggered growing backlash, with Britain announcing sanctions and 11 other countries threatening or considering trade restrictions on Jewish communities in the disputed area.

Advertisement

The Netanyahu government last month announced tenders for the first 1,400 of roughly 3,400 housing units in E1, a 4.6-square-mile area that would expand the built-up connection between Ma’ale Adumim, a city of about 40,000 people in the Judean Desert, and the Israeli capital.

European governments have strongly opposed the move, with Britain’s left-wing ruling party announcing sanctions on Tuesday.

BRITAIN’S DRAMATIC CRACKDOWN ON ISRAELI SETTLEMENTS SPARKS FIERCE RESPONSE AS US BLOWBACK LOOMS

Advertisement

Israel recently announced new building for land in the area of E1. (The Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs.)

The U.K.’s Foreign Secretary, Ed Miliband, announced a ban on products from Judea and Samaria, saying the government in London «believes the unlawfulness of the occupation should be reflected in the economic relationship we choose to have with the occupied territories.»

The foreign ministers of 11 additional countries—Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden—said Tuesday in a joint statement that they intend to impose or are actively considering trade restrictions on goods from Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria.

Advertisement

Doron Spielman, international spokesman for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Office, told Fox News Digital that the E1 project has been underway for years and is located in Area C of the West Bank, which, according to the Oslo Accords, is under full Israeli security and civilian control.

Maale Adumim, Israel

This photograph was taken from the E1 corridor, an area on the West Bank, shows vehicles driving along the highway near the Israeli settlement of Ma’ale Adumim, on September 8, 2026. (Ahmad Gharabli / AFP via Getty Images)

«The Israeli government believes E1 is the natural extension of the area of Ma’ale Adumim, which is an area where Jews live freely within three miles of our biblical capital, Jerusalem. I don’t understand why the world is so focused on a hilltop in the middle of Judea, which is the biblical national homeland of the Jewish people,» he said.

Spielman stressed that «at no point in time, in any agreement that Israel ever made, was E1 ever slated to become part of a Palestinian state.»

Advertisement

«E1 doesn’t affect Palestinian freedom of movement; that’s a myth. … Palestinian propaganda is trying to create an international issue about something that is very basic regarding Jews living in their homeland,» he added.

HOLY LAND BATTLE: SOLOMON’S POOLS BECOME FLASHPOINT IN FIGHT OVER ISRAEL’S BIBLICAL HERITAGE

Old City, Jerusalem

Old City, Jerusalem view. (Planet One Images/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

While not explicitly commenting on E1, a State Department spokesperson told Fox News Digital that, as President Donald Trump has made clear, the United States does not support the annexation of the West Bank.

Advertisement

«Such actions could be counterproductive to the President’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Conflict in Gaza and undermine our broader efforts to achieve regional peace and stability,» the spokesperson said.

Ashraf al-Ajrami, a former Palestinian Authority minister of Prisoners Affairs, told Fox News Digital that there is no scenario in which the Palestinian Authority would agree to construction in E1.

«The whole international community refutes this plan because they understand the objective of it. It’s not a plan that helps settlers to grow; it’s a plan to destroy the hope of having a two-state solution. It is the opposite of the Palestinian national rights of self-determination and statehood,» he said.

Advertisement

«The Israeli government has ignored all the ultimatums from the European Union and even the objections from the American administration up to this point. They will start to build the units merely to divide the Palestinian territories in the West Bank and cut the contiguity between East Jerusalem and our villages in the area,» he added.

Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Michael Oren told Fox News Digital that the E1 project is controversial because the U.S. and other governments that support a two-state solution believe construction there would divide the West Bank and prevent the creation of a Palestinian state.

View of West Bank and Jerusalem

The West Bank, also known as Judea and Samaria is home to some 500,000 Israelis. (Mahmoud Illean/AP)

«The Oslo Accords do not prohibit Israeli settlement construction, nor do they stipulate that the accords’ outcome must be a two-state solution,» he said.

Advertisement

«Therefore, this is not a violation of the Oslo Accords. It may violate the spirit of the accords, but there have been many thousands of violations of their spirit. The Second Intifada was a violation of the spirit of the Oslo Accords,» he added, referring to the Palestinian terror campaign against Israel from 2000 to 2005, which was marked by suicide bombings targeting civilians.

EXCLUSIVE: ISRAEL SEIZES VAST IRAN TERROR AXIS ARSENAL WITH SURPRISING FOREIGN ORIGINS

Naomi Kahn, international director of Regavim, an NGO dedicated to protecting Israel’s national lands, resources and the rule of law, told Fox News Digital that the Palestinian Authority made the plan controversial 30 years ago when it approached the U.S. administration at the time.

Advertisement

«The Rabin government had actually announced plans to develop the Ma’ale Adumim area, and the PA claimed that if Israel built in E1, it would spell the end of any possibility of a Palestinian state,» she said.

While that claim is false in physical terms, Kahn said, it has carried political significance because the PA has made E1 a battleground and involved international actors from the outset.

IDF on patrol

Israeli soldiers patrol a street as they are deployed during an operation in the village of Qusra, south of Nablus, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, on Aug. 13, 2026. Israeli forces on August 13 moved against rogue settlers laying siege to Palestinians amid unusually strong US criticism, even as Israel inaugurated an emblematic settlement elsewhere in the West Bank. Settlers at Qusra near Nablus since August 9 have blockaded Palestinian homes, including one owned by a U.S. citizen, with residents saying they have been cut off from food and other supplies. (Zain Jaafar/AFP via Getty Images)

«E1 has been at the heart of efforts to essentially globalize the push to remove the State of Israel from all of Judea and Samaria,» she said.

Advertisement

Kahn noted that some of the countries pushing for sanctions against Israel have spent the past 20 years actively financing and supporting illegal Arab construction in E1, while Palestinian Authority outposts have increasingly mushroomed throughout Judea and Samaria.

She said Regavim first went to court about 16 years ago over the illegal construction of these outposts and has since won six times.

«Still, nothing has happened,» said Kahn, whose organization was recently among four Israeli civil society organizations sanctioned by the European Union over allegations that they support «settler violence» and undermine prospects for a Palestinian state.

Advertisement
Area C, West Bank.

European Union-sponsored structures in Area C on the West Bank, also known as Judea and Samaria. (Regavim.)

Dan Diker, president of the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs, told Fox News Digital that E1 is a critical security corridor that would help protect Jerusalem from Palestinian terrorism and encroachment into areas under Israeli security and administrative control under the Oslo Accords.

Diker said Israel is wary of another invasion following Oct. 7, this time from Palestinian Arab towns, cities and villages across Judea and Samaria.

He claimed, «There are tens of thousands of machine guns, other weapons and ammunition smuggled into Palestinian villages, towns and cities, and there is deep concern that, particularly in communities in the E1 area, they could cut off the road between Jerusalem and Ma’ale Adumim, creating another existential threat,» he said.

Advertisement

For the international community, Diker said, the political disagreement over E1 is rooted in the period when Israel and the Palestinian Authority were expected to negotiate the final status of a peace agreement.

«Since then, we’ve had the terror war of 2000, followed by four terror wars waged by Hamas, culminating in Oct. 7. The geopolitical and security reality has completely shifted, but the international community’s mindset has not. For them, it’s a political issue; for us, it’s an existential one,» he added.

Advertisement



israel, middle east, sanctions, anti semitism, trade

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Brasil: a menos de un mes de las elecciones, una inédita crisis en la Corte Suprema irrumpió en la campaña presidencial

Published

on


Un juez de la corte suprema de Brasil reintegró este miércoles al director de la Policía Federal, suspendido el martes por un colega, en medio de una crisis inédita desatada en el máximo tribunal a menos de un mes de las elecciones presidenciales del 4 de octubre.

Desatado por una investigación sobre un enorme esquema de fraude, el pulso en la corte toca de lleno la campaña para octubre, cuando el presidente de izquierda Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva buscará la reelección ante el derechista Flávio Bolsonaro.

Advertisement

Lula pidió este miércoles transparencia para acabar con filtraciones que dijo buscan un impacto electoral.

Los jueces enfrentados fueron ambos ministros de Justicia, uno de Lula y otro de Jair Bolsonaro, padre del postulante presidencial.

¿Qué está pasando en la corte?

El magistrado Flávio Dino ordenó que el jefe policial Andrei Rodrigues vuelva a sus funciones contra una decisión de su colega André Mendonça, quien lo suspendió luego de acusar a la Policía Federal (PF) de haberlo espiado ilegalmente.

Advertisement

Rodrigues volvió este miércoles a trabajar en la sede policial en Brasilia, dijo la asesoría de prensa de la institución.

El director general de la Policía Federal de Brasil, Andrei Rodrigues, izquierda, aplaude con el presidente Luíz Inácio Lula da Silva, derecha, y el ministro de Justicia, Wellington Cesar, durante las celebraciones del Día de la Independencia en Brasilia, Brasil, el lunes 7 de septiembre de 2026. (AP Foto/Eraldo Peres)

Tras la decisión de Dino, el presidente de la corte suspendió este miércoles el plenario que los jueces celebran semanalmente, una medida infrecuente según dijo una fuente del tribunal.

La crisis en la corte estalló la semana pasada con la publicación de un informe policial que reveló mensajes del banquero Daniel Vorcaro a un número atribuido a otro juez del máximo tribunal, Alexandre de Moraes.

Advertisement

Vorcaro pedía ayuda para eludir una investigación que poco después llevó a su arresto en noviembre, por sospechas de un multimillonario desfalco financiero que resultaría en la liquidación de su banco Master.

Cruce de acusaciones

El juez Moraes condujo el juicio que el año pasado llevó a la cárcel al expresidente de extrema derecha Jair Bolsonaro (2019-2022), padre de Flávio, por un intento de golpe de Estado en 2022.

Los mensajes de Vorcaro se divulgaron por orden de Mendonça, exministro de Justicia de Bolsonaro y designado en la corte por el exmandatario.

Advertisement

A partir de entonces se sucedieron decisiones hostiles entre los jueces.

Leé también: Un estudiante quedó atrapado en un derrumbe en India, logró mandarle un video de 10 segundos a un amigo y fue rescatado

En base a informes secretos de inteligencia policial, Moraes denunció a su colega por abuso de autoridad al apuntar en su contra.

Advertisement

Mendonça acusó el martes a la Policía Federal de espionaje ilegal y ordenó la suspensión preventiva de su director general.

Pero apenas un día más tarde, Flavio Dino, exministro de Justicia de Lula, ordenó que el presidente restituya a Rodrigues en sus funciones.

En su decisión, el juez adujo que la “medida inédita en la historia de la corporación” de Mendonça puede “paralizar investigaciones y los trabajos policiales” en casos bajo su órbita.

Advertisement

La orden de Dino corre en paralelo a un recurso de la Procuraduría General de la Unión para que el presidente de la corte, Edson Fachin, reincorpore definitivamente a Rodrigues.

“Filtraciones selectivas”

Lula pidió en X levantar el secreto de sumario de “las investigaciones de todos los involucrados en el caso Master, sea quien fuere”, para terminar con “filtraciones selectivas que impactan la disputa electoral”.

Tras respaldar la suspensión de Rodrigues, Flávio Bolsonaro dijo en un acto de campaña en Juiz de Fora (sureste) que Dino “dio un plumazo (…) intentando interferir en un proceso judicial” y que Lula “quiere ganar” fuera de las urnas.

Advertisement

El bolsonarismo también se vio sacudido por el caso Master.

Leé también: Fuerte advertencia del primer ministro británico tras el reclamo de Milei por las Malvinas: “Vamos a ser implacables”

La policía investiga giros millonarios solicitados por Flávio Bolsonaro a Vorcaro que, según el candidato derechista, se usarían para pagar una película biográfica sobre su padre.

Advertisement

El caso Master es un expediente “tóxico”, dijo una fuente del tribunal supremo, ya que la policía presume que el banquero “puso dinero en varios lugares para luego cobrarse favores”.

Unas tres mil entidades empresariales brasileñas divulgaron este miércoles un manifiesto a la nación en el que alertaron sobre una “crisis institucional de extrema gravedad” cuyo “epicentro” es la corte.

“Si la legitimidad (de los jueces) es cuestionada, todo lo demás se vuelve incierto: la seguridad jurídica, la confianza en las instituciones y la misma paz social”, señalaron.

Advertisement

(Con información de AFP)

Brasil

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias