Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Congress extends controversial spy law for 45 days after Senate rejects House bill

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Congress punted a long-term fix for a controversial spy law for the second time in a month as lawmakers raced to avoid a lapse in the government’s warrantless surveillance powers set to expire Friday at midnight.

Advertisement

Both chambers approved a 45-day extension of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) before leaving Washington on Thursday, allowing lawmakers more time to negotiate reforms to the hotly contested program.

President Donald Trump, who wants a clean extension of the surveillance program, is expected to sign the measure into law.

The Senate first agreed to extend the law to mid-June by voice vote, which was quickly followed by the House of Representatives clearing the extension measure in a bipartisan manner.

Advertisement

HOUSE PASSES FISA RENEWAL IN BIPARTISAN VOTE, PUTTING PRESSURE ON SENATE BEFORE LOOMING DEADLINE

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., pauses for questions from reporters as he arrives for an early closed-door Republican Conference meeting at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 3, 2026. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo)

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and the majority of GOP lawmakers argued the spy authority was too critical to lapse.

Advertisement

«If we go to bed tonight and we don’t have that program in place, I fear there will be blood on our hands,» Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb., said earlier on Thursday.

«We can’t have FISA go dark,» House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., told reporters prior to the vote.

The bicameral agreement for a short-term fix came after the Senate swiftly rejected a House bill extending the Section 702 program for three years. The lower chamber’s measure included modest reforms to the program and a permanent ban on central bank digital currencies (CBDC) — a priority of conservatives associated with the House Freedom Caucus. 

Advertisement

But the inclusion of that provision was a nonstarter in the Senate, given that it was unrelated to the underlying bill and was already baked into a housing affordability package passed by the Senate in March that the House has yet to move on.

«We’ll kick it over there and process it quickly, and we’ll kick the can down the road again,» Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told Fox News Digital.

More than two dozen GOP privacy hawks voted against the Senate-passed measure. The group sharply criticized the Senate for quashing the House proposal and argued the upper chamber was trying to jam them with a clean extension including none of their reforms.

Advertisement

«The House needs to stand strong and send it back and say we won’t accept that,» Rep. Keith Self, R-Texas, a GOP privacy hawk, told Fox News. «You need to have a warrant or CBDC on it.»

«Everything that we did yesterday, the Senate has said we won’t take,» the Texas Republican added. «That’s what the Senate thinks of the House.» 

House Democrats were split over the 45-day extension with 94 lawmakers voting in the affirmative and 85 opposing the measure.

Advertisement

The process in the upper chamber was nearly derailed when Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., announced that he planned to block the Senate’s alternative plan in favor of a shorter, three-week extension. 

HOUSE PUNTS TRUMP SPY POWERS EXTENSION AFTER CONSERVATIVES BLOCK DEAL, FORCING END-OF-MONTH SHOWDOWN

Senate Majority Leader John Thune speaking to reporters outside the Senate Chamber in Washington, D.C.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., talks to reporters before entering the Senate chamber in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 5, 2026. (Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

The spy law fight is one of the few horseshoe issues in Congress that blends Democrats and conservatives in a push for stronger privacy protections. That’s because of the Section 702 spying powers, which allow the government to spy on foreign nationals abroad. 

Advertisement

However, nothing in the law prevents it from collecting data on Americans if they happen to be involved in those communications. To stop that, Wyden and others are demanding warrant requirements to add a layer of protection for Americans’ whose conversations are ensnared under Section 702. 

The House’s version lacked that reform, but Wyden agreed to an extension after working with Sens. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., and Mark Warner, D-Va., the top lawmakers on the Senate Intelligence panel, to send a letter to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and the acting Attorney General to declassify a FISA court ruling to show how the program is being used against Americans. 

Meanwhile, conversations on reforms are still ongoing. 

Advertisement
Ron Wyden looks on

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., leaves a Senate Democratic meeting at the U.S. Capitol Building on Oct. 3, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Thune said that there was «already a pretty substantial dialogue» between Cotton, Warner, their House counterparts and the White House to address reforms while ensuring that the «program works.» 

«So we’re entertaining those ideas at the moment, and we’ll see where that conversation goes,» Thune said. «We got 45 days. I don’t like kicking the can down the road, not my jam.»

Advertisement

The Trump administration has lobbied Congress for weeks to pass a long-term FISA renewal bill with little to no modifications, but has repeatedly failed to make headway. 

«This department strongly supports the reauthorization of FISA 702,» Department of War Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers Wednesday. «It is not hyperbole to say many of the most important missions we have executed could not have happened without the intelligence gathered through FISA 702.»

Advertisement

senate elections, legislation, congress, john thune, bills

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

SpaceX lanza una nueva versión del cohete Starship en una prueba clave para la NASA y la carrera espacial de EE.UU.

Published

on


La empresa aeroespacial SpaceX se prepara para lanzar este jueves la última versión de su gigantesco cohete Starship, en un vuelo de prueba considerado clave tanto para el futuro comercial de la compañía como para los planes espaciales de Estados Unidos.

El despegue está programado para las 18:30, hora local (20:30 de Argentina) desde la base de lanzamiento de la empresa en el sur de Texas, en un contexto de enorme expectativa por el avance del proyecto y por la inminente salida a bolsa de la firma fundada por Elon Musk.

Advertisement

La prueba se realizará apenas un día después de que SpaceX presentara ante los reguladores financieros estadounidenses la documentación necesaria para cotizar en bolsa, en una operación que podría concretarse en junio y convertirse en una de las ofertas públicas iniciales (IPO) más grandes de la historia reciente del sector tecnológico.

El nuevo Starship, de unos 124 metros de altura, será el protagonista del duodécimo vuelo de prueba del programa, aunque el primero en siete meses.

La compañía transmitirá en directo la misión y aprovechará el lanzamiento para mostrar los avances tecnológicos del sistema, considerado fundamental para los objetivos de exploración lunar de la NASA.

Advertisement

A diferencia de ensayos anteriores, SpaceX no intentará recuperar el propulsor de la primera etapa, una maniobra que ya había ejecutado con éxito en pruebas previas. En esta ocasión, el booster caerá deliberadamente en aguas del golfo de México, mientras que la etapa superior continuará en una trayectoria suborbital.

Durante la misión, prevista para durar unos 65 minutos, la nave desplegará 20 satélites ficticios y dos satélites Starlink modificados especialmente con cámaras para estudiar el comportamiento del escudo térmico del vehículo durante el reingreso atmosférico. Si todo sale según lo previsto, la etapa superior terminará amerizando en el océano Índico.

Aunque las últimas misiones de Starship concluyeron satisfactoriamente, el programa sufrió varios reveses en el pasado. Algunas pruebas terminaron en explosiones, incluso después de alcanzar el espacio, y en junio de 2025 una etapa superior explotó durante un ensayo en tierra.

Advertisement

El nuevo vuelo también se desarrolla bajo la sombra de un reciente accidente laboral en las instalaciones de Texas, donde un trabajador murió tras caer de un andamio, según reportes locales.

Leé también: Las claves para entender por qué Elon Musk fue el gran perdedor en el juicio contra los creadores de ChatGPT

La misión llega además en un momento decisivo para la carrera espacial. La NASA contrató a SpaceX para desarrollar una versión adaptada de Starship que funcione como módulo de alunizaje dentro del programa Programa Artemis, cuyo objetivo es llevar nuevamente astronautas a la Luna antes de finales de 2028.

Advertisement

El nuevo cohete Starship V3 de SpaceX se ve acoplado en la base Starbase durante el duodécimo vuelo de prueba, el 21 de mayo de 2026, visto desde South Padre Island, en Texas. (Foto: Ronaldo Schemidt / AFP)

El proyecto cobra aún más relevancia frente al avance de China, que apunta a concretar su primera misión lunar tripulada hacia 2030. Dentro del gobierno del presidente Donald Trump crece la preocupación por la posibilidad de que Estados Unidos pierda liderazgo en la nueva carrera espacial.

“Hay mucho en juego”, afirmó el físico G. Scott Hubbard, exdirector del Centro de Investigación Ames de la NASA y actual académico de la Universidad de Stanford. Según el especialista, el desafío técnico más complejo sigue siendo demostrar capacidades de reabastecimiento orbital con combustible superenfriado, una tecnología todavía no probada y considerada indispensable para futuras misiones de espacio profundo.

Advertisement

En paralelo, la competencia con Blue Origin, la firma aeroespacial creada por Jeff Bezos, también presiona los tiempos del sector privado. Ambas compañías buscan posicionarse como actores centrales en la futura economía lunar y en los contratos multimillonarios vinculados a la exploración espacial.

(Con información de AFP)

SpaceX, NASA, Elon Musk

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump admin pushes back on ‘slush fund’ attacks against Anti-Weaponization Fund and lays out who qualifies

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Trump administration says the $1.778 billion Justice Department «Anti-Weaponization Fund» will compensate Americans unfairly targeted by politicized federal investigations on a «case-by-case» basis, pushing back on critics who have portrayed the program as a taxpayer-funded payout for Jan. 6 rioters and Trump allies.

Advertisement

Heated dispute over the fund centers on who will ultimately benefit from it, with Trump administration officials saying it is intended to compensate individuals harmed by «weaponized» federal investigations, such as pro-lifers targeted by the Biden administration, while Democratic critics fear it could allow politically connected figures or some Jan. 6 defendants to seek taxpayer-funded payments.

«Republicans can apply for it. Democrats can apply for it,» Vice President J.D. Vance said during a Tuesday White House briefing in answer to the critics. «If Hunter Biden wants to apply for this particular fund, he is welcome to.»

The Anti-Weaponization Fund is unusual because it emerged from a lawsuit settlement between Trump and the IRS, an agency he oversees as president, raising concerns among lawmakers and commentators about potential conflicts of interest.

Advertisement

REPUBLICANS RECOIL AS TRUMP’S BILLION-DOLLAR DOJ ‘SLUSH FUND’ FOR ALLIES THREATENS ICE, BORDER PATROL PLAN

An image shows the Department of Justice building with an overlay of Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images; Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

MS NOW contributor Joe Scarborough alleged that the Anti-Weaponization Fund would be funneled to those convicted in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riots. On his first day in office, Trump issued pardons and commutations to more than 1,500 people involved in the Capitol riots.

Advertisement

«We got this billion-dollar ‘Marie Antoinette’ ballroom, now that they’re talking about funding and $1 billion plus slush fund for people who beat the hell out of cops,» Scarborough said. «It is a slush fund, a weaponization slush fund for supporters of Donald Trump, JD Vance and the Republican Party.»

But the Trump administration’s grievances with the «weaponization» of the Justice Department extend far beyond Biden-era prosecutions of those involved in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol Hill riot.

Biden’s Justice Department prosecuted more than 50 pro-life activists who were accused of violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE Act) between 2021 and 2024. Since returning to office, Trump pardoned dozens of pro-life activists, some of whom were serving jail time.

Advertisement

The Trump Justice Department has also accused Biden-era officials of «zealously pursuing» prosecutions against Christians in its «2026 Report by the Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias,» potentially opening the door for another category of people who could seek compensation through the fund.

Still, Trump faces criticism over the fund even from his own party. Sen. John Thune, R-SD, the top Republican leader in the Senate, said he wasn’t a «big fan» of the fund’s creation and that he «was not sure exactly how they intend to use it.»

BIDEN DOJ WEAPONIZED FACE ACT AGAINST PRO-LIFE AMERICANS, 882-REPORT ALLEGES

Advertisement

«I think that there are, and will continue to be, a lot of questions around that, that the administration is going to have to answer,» Thune said.

Justice Department officials and some legal experts say the fund, while unusual and politically controversial, falls within the government’s legal authority and that payments aren’t guaranteed.

The Anti-Weaponization Fund was born out of a settlement between President Donald Trump and the Internal Revenue Service. Trump filed the lawsuit against in January over the unauthorized disclosure of his tax records.

Advertisement
A sign for the Internal Revenue Service outside its building in Washington, D.C.

A sign for the Internal Revenue Service is seen outside its headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 13, 2025. (Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)

Claims will be determined by a five-person board appointed by the Attorney General, with at least one member selected with consultation with congressional leadership, according to a Justice Department press release. At any point in time, the president has the power to remove a member without cause.

Under the settlement agreement, the Anti-Weaponization Fund will evaluate claims by looking at the «totality of the circumstances.» Those factors considered include how strong a person’s claim is and what evidence supports it, the financial harm they allegedly suffered — including legal fees — whether they spent time in prison and whether they have already received compensation or other relief elsewhere.

The agreement also gives the board discretion to weigh «other factors» it considers fair and appropriate when deciding whether someone qualifies for compensation.

Advertisement

«This is about seeking accountability for all Americans who were victims of law fare and weaponization: millions of Americans whose online speech was censored at the behest of the government, parents silenced at school boards, Senators whose records were secretly subpoenaed, churchgoers targeted by the FBI, and so on,» a Justice Department document stated.

The Anti-Weaponization Fund will last until December 1, 2028.

APOLOGIES AND CASH HEADED TO ALLEGED ‘WEAPONIZATION’ VICTIMS IN BILLION-DOLLAR TRUMP SETTLEMENT

Advertisement
trump at resolute desk in oval office

«It would be a disgrace if the Supreme Court of the United States allows that to happen. Remember what I said 20 to 25% of the people coming into our country will come in through birthright citizenship,» said Trump. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Funding for the Anti-Weaponization Fund is coming from the Judgment Fund, which is a permanent Treasury account used to pay for settlements and claims against the government.

While the Justice Department pointed to the Obama administration’s creation of «Keepseagle,» a $760 million fund for victims of racism by the federal government as precedent for the creation of the fund, legal experts say there are key distinctions between the two. For instance, payouts in Keepseagle were made out to people a part of a class action lawsuit against the government; whereas anyone can apply for a claim with the Anti-Weaponization Fund.

Advertisement

«The Judgment Fund is for lawsuits,» Adam Zimmerman, a professor at USC Gould School of Law told PBS News. «It’s not for an amorphous group of people who feel like they’ve been wronged generally by a prior administration.»

But unlike the Keepseagle, which distributed leftover funds to nonprofits, the Anti-Weaponization Fund will return remaining funds back to the Department of Commerce. Although, the practice of disbursing leftover funds to related third party organizations, which occurred in Keepseagle, is not uncommon in class action lawsuits.

Advertisement

attorney general, administration, capitol protests, congress, justice department, politics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Costa Rica descarta casos de Ébola y Salud llama a reforzar medidas preventivas

Published

on


El Ministerio de Salud confirmó que Costa Rica no registra casos de virus Bundibugyo ni de Ébola. REUTERS/Gradel Muyisa Mumbere

El Ministerio de Salud de Costa Rica confirmó que Costa Rica no registra casos de enfermedad por virus Bundibugyo, una de las variantes del virus del Ébola que actualmente mantiene en alerta a organismos internacionales de salud debido a un brote activo en África central.

La institución indicó que tampoco existen casos reportados en la región de las Américas y aseguró que, por ahora, el riesgo para la población costarricense continúa siendo bajo. Sin embargo, las autoridades señalaron que mantienen vigilancia epidemiológica constante y pidieron a la ciudadanía reforzar las medidas preventivas.

Advertisement

La advertencia ocurre en medio de la creciente preocupación internacional por la situación que enfrentan la República Democrática del Congo y Uganda, donde se detectó un brote de la cepa Bundibugyo, una variante rara del Ébola para la que actualmente no existe vacuna ni tratamiento específico aprobado.

De acuerdo con la Organización Mundial de la Salud, hasta mediados de mayo se contabilizaban al menos ocho casos confirmados por laboratorio, 246 casos sospechosos y cerca de 80 muertes sospechosas en la provincia de Ituri, en el este del Congo.

No obstante, reportes más recientes advierten que la cifra podría ser considerablemente mayor. Medios internacionales y organismos humanitarios señalan que el brote ya habría provocado unas 139 muertes y cerca de 600 casos sospechosos o probables entre Congo y Uganda, mientras las autoridades sanitarias continúan investigando nuevas cadenas de transmisión.

Advertisement
La OMS declaró emergencia internacional por el brote detectado en Congo y Uganda. REUTERS/Gradel Muyisa Mumbere
La OMS declaró emergencia internacional por el brote detectado en Congo y Uganda. REUTERS/Gradel Muyisa Mumbere

La OMS declaró el pasado 16 de mayo la situación como una Emergencia de Salud Pública de Importancia Internacional, debido al riesgo de expansión regional y a las complejas condiciones en las zonas afectadas.

El brote preocupa especialmente porque se desarrolla en áreas con presencia de grupos armados, desplazamientos masivos de población y sistemas sanitarios limitados, lo que dificulta el rastreo de contagios y la atención de pacientes. Además, el virus ya fue detectado fuera de la zona inicial del brote y se confirmaron casos importados en Uganda.

Las autoridades sanitarias internacionales también han advertido que la enfermedad habría circulado durante semanas sin ser detectada, debido a que la cepa Bundibugyo no suele incluirse en pruebas estándar de Ébola y porque inicialmente se confundió con otras enfermedades hemorrágicas.

El virus del Ébola se transmite por contacto directo con sangre o fluidos corporales de personas infectadas, como saliva, vómito, sudor, orina o heces. También puede propagarse mediante objetos contaminados, incluyendo ropa, superficies o sábanas expuestas a dichos fluidos. Las autoridades reiteraron que el virus no se transmite por el aire.

Advertisement

Los síntomas pueden aparecer entre dos y 21 días después del contagio. Inicialmente se presentan fiebre, dolor de cabeza intenso, debilidad y dolores musculares. En etapas avanzadas pueden producirse vómitos, diarrea, dolor abdominal, hemorragias y deterioro severo del estado general.

El brote en África ya deja decenas de fallecidos y cientos de casos sospechosos bajo investigación. REUTERS/Gradel Muyisa Mumbere
El brote en África ya deja decenas de fallecidos y cientos de casos sospechosos bajo investigación. REUTERS/Gradel Muyisa Mumbere

Según la OMS, las tasas de mortalidad de brotes previos de la variante Bundibugyo oscilaron entre el 30% y el 50%, aunque otras cepas del Ébola pueden alcanzar mortalidades mucho mayores.

Ante este panorama, el Ministerio de Salud de Costa Rica informó que se revisan continuamente los protocolos de preparación y respuesta para eventuales casos sospechosos, así como los mecanismos de vigilancia epidemiológica en puntos de ingreso al país.

La institución recomendó mantener medidas preventivas básicas, entre ellas el lavado frecuente de manos, evitar contacto con personas enfermas y reforzar el uso de equipo de protección en servicios de salud.

Advertisement

Asimismo, pidió a la población mantenerse informada únicamente mediante canales oficiales para evitar desinformación o alarmas injustificadas relacionadas con el virus.



General Health,Medicines,Africa,Health / Medicine

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias